Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 207 references

Propulsion and interaction of wave-propelled interfacial particles

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A floating body's own waves can propel it and bind it to others in quantized orbits.

desk verdict Honest review of a young subfield: the platform's qualitative promise holds, but the central interaction law is softer than 'first-principles' language suggests. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.00247 v2 pith:PBCX7KUW submitted 2025-06-30 physics.flu-dyn

Daniel M. Harris , Jack-William Barotta This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.flu-dyn MSC 76B1576B45 PACS 47.35.Bb47.35.Pq
keywords wavepropulsioncapillary-gravitywavesradiationstresscapillarysurferspinnerwave-mediatedinteractionactivematterhydrodynamicquantumanalogs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that a single physical mechanism, the momentum carried by self-generated capillary-gravity waves, unifies a wide range of recently discovered floating-particle behaviors: straight propulsion of asymmetric bodies, steady rotation of chiral bodies, and long-range, wavelength-quantized attraction and synchronization between pairs and small groups. The authors contend that these systems form an accessible experimental platform for studying wave-driven active matter, hydrodynamic quantum analogs, and small-scale robotics, because the governing mechanics reduce to measurable wave-structure forces rather than hidden surface chemistry. A sympathetic reader would take away that the wavefield is not a side effect of these particles' motion but the central agent causing both their locomotion and their collective organization.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the wave radiation stress $S_{xx}$, the excess flow of horizontal momentum carried by a capillary-gravity wave, which for a deep-water plane wave takes the explicit form $S_{xx} = (\frac{1}{4}\rho g + \frac{3}{4}\sigma k^2)A^2$. For interactions, the load-bearing object is the cycle-averaged wave interaction force between two oscillating point sources, equation 28, which combines the quasi-potential wavefield (equation 27) with the surface-gradient forcing rule $F = F_p \nabla h$. This force is what converts an oscillating neighbor's wavefield into a net, wavelength-periodic attraction or repulsion, and it is what the review uses to explain quantized pair spacings, spinner synchronization, and the stability of the observed collective modes.

What would settle it

The central claim would collapse if, in a carefully controlled experiment, the measured propulsion speed or interaction force of a capillary surfer were found to scale as the fourth power of wave amplitude $(kA)^4$ rather than the square $(kA)^2$, or if measurements showed that eliminating the streaming surface flows by, say, increasing viscosity removed the propulsion entirely while the radiation stress remained unchanged.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a floating body which oscillates at a fluid interface generates its own propagating capillary-gravity wavefield, and that the radiation stress of that wavefield both propels the body and mediates its interactions with neighboring bodies. Propulsion arises because an asymmetric wavefield carries a net momentum flux, so the body feels a reaction force opposite to the direction of wave emission. Interaction arises because a neighboring body, oscillating in sync with the incident wave, samples the wave's height gradients in a way that produces a nonzero time-averaged lateral force, with stable spacings separated by approximately integer wavelengths. The review compiles evidence from experiments on capillary surfers, capillary spinners, and related systems, and shows that a quasi-potential point-source model, anchored by equation 28, reproduces the observed pairwise forces, quantized spacings, and synchronization behaviors. The authors further claim that the same radiation-stress mechanism explains biological examples, such as a honeybee trapped at an interface, and robotic devices, such as the SurferBot, across scales from millimeters to meters.

Load-bearing premise

The quantitative predictions rely on representing each particle as a collection of idealized point sources whose forcing amplitude is either assumed or fitted, and on assuming that wave radiation stress, not the streaming surface flows, provides the dominant propulsion and interaction force.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim is correct, wave-propelled particles make a tunable tabletop platform for studying inertial active matter, since particle shape, driving frequency, and bath parameters directly control propulsion, rotation, and interaction length scales.
  • The quantized stable spacings predicted by the wave-interaction force imply that collections of surfers and spinners can self-assemble into ordered structures whose lattice constant is set by the capillary wavelength rather than by particle size.
  • The efficiency estimate of equation 45, with $\eta_p = \chi M_a/(1+\chi M_a)$, implies that optimizing driving frequency and motor placement can raise wave-propulsion efficiency by more than an order of magnitude, as demonstrated for the SurferBot.
  • The comparison with walking droplets suggests that this platform can be explored as a hydrodynamic quantum analog, with the key difference that surfer wavefields are propagating rather than standing, which changes the nature of the spatial quantization.
  • Because propulsion and steering can be controlled remotely by frequency modulation of a single onboard actuator, the mechanism could enable simple, low-cost robotic devices that navigate without contacting the water.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The review leaves implicit that the same wavelength-quantized interaction force could be used to build reconfigurable metamaterials at a fluid interface, where the spacing between particles is locked to a controllable wavelength and can be tuned in real time by changing the driving frequency.
  • A testable extension beyond the pairwise results would be to measure the three-body interaction force directly and compare it to the sum of pairwise forces from equation 28, since the review notes that nonreciprocal and higher-order effects appear at the three-body level in acoustically levitated systems.
  • One could probe the assumed dominance of radiation stress over surface streaming by measuring the propulsion force on a surfer while systematically varying wave amplitude and comparing the scaling of thrust with $(kA)^2$ versus $(kA)^4$, which would separate the two contributions.
  • The review's framework suggests that adding a controlled noise source (e.g., supercritical Faraday waves) could convert the deterministic wave-propelled particles into a tunable active Brownian system with a measurable effective temperature, connecting directly to colloidal active matter phenomenology.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This perspective/review article surveys wave-propelled interfacial particles: it recaps the standard physics of capillary-gravity waves, radiation stress, interfacial drag, capillary attraction, and then reviews recent experiments and modeling of capillary surfers and spinners, their pairwise interactions, synchronization, and collective behaviors. The authors argue that these systems are accessible, tunable, and capable of informing active matter, hydrodynamic quantum analog, and robotics research. The quantitative centerpiece is the quasi-potential point-source interaction model leading to Eq. (28), which is used to rationalize quantized spacings and phase synchronization, while the later sections present a broad set of open questions, order-of-magnitude estimates, and connections to other tabletop active systems.

Significance. If the review's framing is accepted, the paper provides a useful consolidation of a young and rapidly growing area, with several genuinely helpful elements: a careful derivation of radiation stress (Eq. (11)), a compact catalog of drag laws, a transparent account of where the point-source model fails (Section IV), and a set of clearly labeled crude estimates in Section V. The authors also deserve credit for explicitly flagging missing quantitative agreement for bound-pair speeds and free-spinner precession, and for discussing streaming flows as a possibly significant omitted mechanism. The platform itself does appear to be an accessible experimental system with real potential for future studies. The main weakness is that the 'first-principles, parameter-light' characterization of the modeling infrastructure, especially in the final paragraph of Section V.E, is stronger than what Eqs. (21), (28), and the drag coefficients actually deliver.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section V.E, final paragraph; Eq. (28)] The sentence claiming that 'theoretical models can be developed directly from first principles for our system, reducing the need for fitting parameters' is not supported by the evidence presented in the paper itself. Equation (28) contains the prefactor α, which is either set to unity or fitted to wavefield measurements; Eq. (21) contains an empirical factor of 2; and the drag coefficients D and D_R in Eqs. (30)-(31) are either modeled with additional assumptions or measured. Section IV also concedes that bound-pair speeds are not quantitatively aligned and that free-spinner precession is absent from the model. This overstatement is load-bearing for the paper's broader claim that the platform enables first-principles tabletop explorations. Please qualify the sentence to say 'quasi-potential, weakly viscous first-principles modeling with a small number of fitted parameters' and explicitly cite α and the empirical capillary-force factor as the remaining empirical inputs.
  2. [Section V.A and Eq. (34); Section IV, Eqs. (28)-(31)] The interaction model used for the quantitative predictions of spacings and synchronization neglects streaming flows, but Section V.A shows that these flows are not negligible: the characteristic streaming speed scales as c(kA)^2 and Eq. (34) gives a thrust scaling of (kA)^4, while radiation stress scales as (kA)^2. For the SurferBot parameters quoted in Section V.A (A=0.02 cm, λ=0.40 cm, kA≈0.31), the ratio of Eq. (34) to Eq. (11) is approximately (1/3)(kA)^2 ≈ 3%, before O(1) geometric and prefactor effects, and the text itself states that Eulerian mean flows are 'very likely also significant.' The paper should state explicitly in Section IV that the quantitative predictions from Eq. (28) for equilibrium spacings, synchronization bistability, and locking thresholds carry an unquantified systematic uncertainty of at least a few to ten percent, and that extending the model to include streaming is an open problem.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract contains a typo: 'F reely floating particles' should be 'Freely floating particles.'
  2. [Figure 2 caption] The caption lists '(e)' twice for the chiral star-shaped spinner and for the combined polar-chiral disk; the second entry should presumably be labeled '(f).'
  3. [Section V.C] The word 'subcritial' should be 'subcritical' in the sentence about the subcritical and supercritical regimes.
  4. [Section VI] The phrase 'we have successful leveraged' should read 'we have successfully leveraged.'
  5. [Section II.D] The symbol A is used for the reference area in Eq. (13) and again for the contact area in Eq. (15); please use distinct symbols (e.g., A_ref and A_contact) or add explicit definitions to avoid ambiguity.
  6. [Section V.A, Eq. (34)] The estimate leading to Eq. (34) focuses on Stokes drift and explicitly sets aside Eulerian mean flow contributions. Given the sentence that Eulerian mean flows are 'very likely also significant,' a short sentence with a rough estimate for the Eulerian contribution, or a citation to a case where it dominates, would make the Section V.A discussion more balanced.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the quantitative model has disclosed prefactors and independent checks; acknowledged limitations are accuracy concerns, not definitional circularity.

full rationale

This paper is a perspective/review rather than a new derivation, and its central quantitative object is the point-source interaction model of Sec. IV, Eq. (28), imported from Oza et al. [10] and Barotta et al. [11]. Walking the derivation chain: Eq. (28) follows from the linearized quasi-potential equations (23)-(26), the Green's function (27), and the gradient-sampling force rule (20). The only dimensional prefactor is F1 = alpha^2 m_i m_j gamma^2 k_c/(24 sigma), with alpha either set to 1 in [10] or fitted to direct wavefield measurements in [11]. It is not fitted to the observables the model is used to predict (equilibrium spacings, phase bistability, locking thresholds); in the alpha = 1 version there is no fitted parameter at all. The zero crossings of F_w, which encode the wavelength-quantized equilibria, are independent of the positive prefactor alpha^2, so the quantization claim is not forced by construction. The empirical factor of 2 in Eq. (21) is explicitly labeled as a fit and is not the capillary law used in the interaction simulations, which instead use the point-charge formula Eq. (29). The acknowledged failures (bound-surfer speeds, free-spinner precession) and the Section V.A statement that Eulerian mean flows are 'very likely also significant' are quantitative limitations and correctness risks, not circularity. Self-citations to [9]-[12] are standard citations to independently published work, and no load-bearing claim is reduced to an unverified self-citation or to an imported uniqueness theorem. Hence no significant circularity is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review's quantitative framework relies on the quasi-potential and point-source models with fitted parameters alpha and an empirical factor in the capillary law. These are honest limitations acknowledged in the text, but they indicate that the model predictions are not fully parameter-free.

free parameters (3)
  • alpha (prefactor in forcing amplitude) = 1 (assumed) or fit to wavefield measurements
    In Section IV, F0 = alpha * m * gamma; alpha accounts for unresolved vertical particle dynamics and is either taken as one in prior work or fit to wavefield data in other papers.
  • Empirical factor 2 in capillary attraction law (equation 21) = 2
    Equation 21, F(l) = -2 F_sigma exp(-(l-2R)/l_c), includes a factor of 2 determined by fit to experiments and simulations over a range of parameters, as stated in Section II.E.
  • Drag coefficients D and D_R = Modeled via Couette flow or measured
    In equations 30 and 31, linear and rotational drag coefficients are inputs obtained from separate free-deceleration experiments or fluid models, not derived within the review.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Quasi-potential flow approximation with weak viscosity
    Used throughout Section II.B and IV to model the wavefield; assumes viscosity enters only through boundary conditions, valid for small dimensionless viscosity epsilon.
  • domain assumption Linearized Young-Laplace equation for static meniscus
    Used in Section II.A to derive the meniscus profile h(r) = -d K0(r/l_c)/K0(R/l_c), assuming small deformations and pinned contact line.
  • standard math Deep water dispersion with tanh(kH) approximately 1
    Adopted in Section II.B and used for the wavefield expressions in Section IV; valid for kH >> 1.
  • standard math Small-amplitude waves with neglect of O(A^3)
    Used in Section II.C to derive radiation stress equation 11, consistent with linear wave theory.
  • ad hoc to paper Point-source superposition model for particle interactions
    In Section IV, each body is represented as a collection of point sources (equations 30 and 31) to heuristically capture geometry; the placement and strength of sources require a protocol that the review admits is not rigorously defined.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Propulsion and interaction of wave-propelled interfacial particles." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PBCX7KUW

@misc{pith2026250700247,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Propulsion and interaction of wave-propelled interfacial particles},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PBCX7KUW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.00247}
}
read the original abstract

When a floating body is internally or externally vibrated, its self-generated wavefield can lead to steady propulsion along the interface. In this article, we review several related and recently discovered systems that leverage this propulsion mechanism and interact hydrodynamically with one another via these surface waves. Particles with an onboard oscillatory driver may self-propel by virtue of a fore-aft asymmetric wavefield, a phenomenon with demonstrated relevance to biological and artificial systems across scales. Freely floating particles on a vibrated fluid bath can also self-propel along straight paths, but may also rotate in place or move along curved arcs, depending sensitively on the particle asymmetries and driving parameters. Such surfing particles interact at a distance through their mutual capillary wavefield and exhibit a rich array of collective dynamics. Overall, these accessible, tunable, and visually appealing systems motivate future investigations into a number of outstanding questions in fundamental fluid mechanics, while potentially also informing advances in the fields of active matter, hydrodynamic quantum analogs, and robotics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.00247 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Photo of a circular capillary disk of radius [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Wave propulsion resulting from unbalanced wave radiation stress excited by internal forcing (top row) and external [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Wave-mediated interaction between pairs of identical surfers and spinners. (a) Pairs of surfers exhibit seven qualitatively [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) A single spherical particle on a vibrating fluid bath ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. A peanut-shaped capillary disk on a vibrating bath generates (a) a complex wavefield that induces (b) strong surface [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Collections of multiple surfers self-assemble to form collective states that (a) are immobile, (b) move along a straight [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (a) A capillary disk of radius [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. (a) Undergraduate student Yesenia Gomez leads a SurferBot workshop as part of Brown University’s 2025 STEM Day [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

207 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    air-hockey

    Relationship to Other Tabletop Active Systems Given the vast scope of research within the field of active matter, we will not attempt to cover all experimental platforms and analytical approaches in our discussion. Instead, we will direct our focus on three related tabletop systems that share strong similarities with our own, and where we believe mutual i...

    2025

  2. [2]

    M. S. Longuet-Higgins, The mean forces exerted by waves on floating or submerged bodies with applications to sand bars and wave power machines, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences352, 463 (1977)

    1977

  3. [3]

    M. S. Longuet-Higgins and R. Stewart, Radiation stresses in water waves; a physical discussion, with applications, in Deep Sea Research and Oceanographic Abstracts, Vol. 11 (Elsevier, 1964) pp. 529–562

    1964

  4. [4]

    Roh and M

    C. Roh and M. Gharib, Honeybees use their wings for water surface locomotion, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences116, 24446 (2019)

    2019

  5. [5]

    G. P. Benham, O. Devauchelle, S. W. Morris, and J. A. Neufeld, Gunwale bobbing, Physical Review Fluids7, 074804 (2022)

    2022

  6. [6]

    E. Rhee, R. Hunt, S. J. Thomson, and D. M. Harris, Surferbot: a wave-propelled aquatic vibrobot, Bioinspiration & Biomimetics17, 055001 (2022)

    2022

  7. [7]

    G. P. Benham, O. Devauchelle, and S. J. Thomson, On wave-driven propulsion, Journal of Fluid Mechanics987, A44 (2024)

    2024

  8. [8]

    I. Ho, G. Pucci, A. U. Oza, and D. M. Harris, Capillary surfers: Wave-driven particles at a vibrating fluid interface, Physical Review Fluids8, L112001 (2023)

    2023

Show all 207 references
  1. [9]

    Barotta, S

    J.-W. Barotta, S. J. Thomson, L. F. Alventosa, M. Lewis, and D. M. Harris, Bidirectional wave-propelled capillary spinners, Communications Physics6, 87 (2023)

    2023

  2. [10]

    De Corato and V

    M. De Corato and V. Garbin, Capillary interactions between dynamically forced particles adsorbed at a planar interface and on a bubble, Journal of Fluid Mechanics847, 71 (2018)

    2018

  3. [11]

    A. U. Oza, G. Pucci, I. Ho, and D. M. Harris, Theoretical modeling of capillary surfer interactions on a vibrating fluid bath, Physical Review Fluids8, 114001 (2023)

    2023

  4. [12]

    Barotta, G

    J.-W. Barotta, G. Pucci, E. Silver, A. Hooshanginejad, and D. M. Harris, Synchronization of wave-propelled capillary spinners, Physical Review E111, 035105 (2025)

    2025

  5. [13]

    Sungar, J

    N. Sungar, J. Sharpe, L. Ijzerman, and J.-W. Barotta, Synchronization and self-assembly of free capillary spinners, Physical Review E111, 035104 (2025)

    2025

  6. [14]

    S. W. Tarr, J. S. Brunner, D. Soto, and D. I. Goldman, Probing hydrodynamic fluctuation-induced forces with an oscillating robot, Physical Review Letters132, 084001 (2024)

    2024

  7. [15]

    M. C. Marchetti, J.-F. Joanny, S. Ramaswamy, T. B. Liverpool, J. Prost, M. Rao, and R. A. Simha, Hydrodynamics of soft active matter, Reviews of Modern Physics85, 1143 (2013)

    2013

  8. [16]

    Bechinger, R

    C. Bechinger, R. Di Leonardo, H. L¨ owen, C. Reichhardt, G. Volpe, and G. Volpe, Active particles in complex and crowded environments, Reviews of Modern Physics88, 045006 (2016)

    2016

  9. [17]

    J. W. Bush, V. Frumkin, and P. J. S´ aenz, Perspectives on pilot-wave hydrodynamics, Applied Physics Letters125(2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    M. X. Lim, B. VanSaders, and H. M. Jaeger, Acoustic manipulation of multi-body structures and dynamics, Reports on Progress in Physics87, 064601 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    J. W. Bush and D. L. Hu, Walking on water: biolocomotion at the interface, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics38, 339 (2006)

    2006

  12. [20]

    Yuan and S

    J. Yuan and S. K. Cho, Bio-inspired micro/mini propulsion at air-water interface: A review, Journal of Mechanical Science 24 and Technology26, 3761 (2012)

    2012

  13. [21]

    Klotsa, As above, so below, and also in between: mesoscale active matter in fluids, Soft Matter15, 8946 (2019)

    D. Klotsa, As above, so below, and also in between: mesoscale active matter in fluids, Soft Matter15, 8946 (2019)

    2019

  14. [22]

    Dombrowski and D

    T. Dombrowski and D. Klotsa, Kinematics of a simple reciprocal model swimmer at intermediate Reynolds numbers, Physical Review Fluids5, 063103 (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    N. J. Derr, T. Dombrowski, C. H. Rycroft, and D. Klotsa, Reciprocal swimming at intermediate Reynolds number, Journal of Fluid Mechanics952, A8 (2022)

    2022

  16. [24]

    Herrera-Amaya and M

    A. Herrera-Amaya and M. L. Byron, Propulsive efficiency of spatiotemporally asymmetric oscillating appendages at intermediate Reynolds numbers, Bioinspiration & Biomimetics19, 066004 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    Cobos, A

    R. Cobos, A. S. Khair, and O. Schnitzer, Spontaneous locomotion of a symmetric squirmer, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 983, R3 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    Z. Shen, D. Fu, and J. S. Lintuvuori, Inertia-driven propulsion of asymmetric spinner-dimers at moderate Reynolds numbers, Soft Matter (2025)

    2025

  19. [27]

    I. Ho, G. Pucci, and D. M. Harris, Direct measurement of capillary attraction between floating disks, Physical Review Letters123, 254502 (2019)

    2019

  20. [28]

    Vella, Floating versus sinking, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics47, 115 (2015)

    D. Vella, Floating versus sinking, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics47, 115 (2015)

    2015

  21. [29]

    P. K. Kundu, I. M. Cohen, D. R. Dowling, and J. Capecelatro,Fluid mechanics(Elsevier, 2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    Armaroli, D

    A. Armaroli, D. Eeltink, M. Brunetti, and J. Kasparian, Viscous damping of gravity-capillary waves: Dispersion relations and nonlinear corrections, Physical Review Fluids3, 124803 (2018)

    2018

  23. [31]

    Behroozi, B

    F. Behroozi, B. Lambert, and B. Buhrow, Direct measurement of the attenuation of capillary waves by laser interferometry: Noncontact determination of viscosity, Applied Physics Letters78, 2399 (2001)

    2001

  24. [32]

    F. Dias, A. I. Dyachenko, and V. E. Zakharov, Theory of weakly damped free-surface flows: a new formulation based on potential flow solutions, Physics Letters A372, 1297 (2008)

    2008

  25. [33]

    Milewski, C

    P. Milewski, C. Galeano-Rios, A. Nachbin, and J. W. M. Bush, Faraday pilot-wave dynamics: modelling and computation, Journal of Fluid Mechanics778, 361 (2015)

    2015

  26. [34]

    C. A. Galeano-Rios, P. A. Milewski, and J.-M. Vanden-Broeck, Non-wetting impact of a sphere onto a bath and its application to bouncing droplets, Journal of Fluid Mechanics826, 97 (2017)

    2017

  27. [35]

    C. A. Galeano-Rios, R. Cimpeanu, I. A. Bauman, A. MacEwen, P. A. Milewski, and D. M. Harris, Capillary-scale solid rebounds: experiments, modelling and simulations, Journal of Fluid Mechanics912, A17 (2021)

    2021

  28. [36]

    L. F. Alventosa, R. Cimpeanu, and D. M. Harris, Inertio-capillary rebound of a droplet impacting a fluid bath, Journal of Fluid Mechanics958, A24 (2023)

    2023

  29. [37]

    J. T. Petkov, N. D. Denkov, K. D. Danov, O. D. Velev, R. Aust, and F. Durst, Measurement of the drag coefficient of spherical particles attached to fluid interfaces, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science172, 147 (1995)

    1995

  30. [38]

    K. D. Danov, R. Dimova, and B. Pouligny, Viscous drag of a solid sphere straddling a spherical or flat surface, Physics of Fluids12, 2711 (2000)

    2000

  31. [39]

    Z. Zhou, P. M. Vlahovska, and M. J. Miksis, Drag force on spherical particles trapped at a liquid interface, Physical Review Fluids7, 124001 (2022)

    2022

  32. [40]

    cheerios effect

    D. Vella and L. Mahadevan, The “cheerios effect”, American Journal of Physics73, 817 (2005)

    2005

  33. [41]

    Lagubeau, G

    G. Lagubeau, G. Grosjean, A. Darras, G. Lumay, M. Hubert, and N. Vandewalle, Statics and dynamics of magnetocapillary bonds, Physical Review E93, 053117 (2016)

    2016

  34. [42]

    S. J. Thomson, J.-W. Barotta, and D. M. Harris, Nonequilibrium capillary self-assembly, arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.01668 (2023)

    2023

  35. [43]

    Benusiglio, F

    A. Benusiglio, F. Chevy, ´E. Rapha¨ el, and C. Clanet, Wave drag on a submerged sphere, Physics of Fluids27(2015)

    2015

  36. [44]

    Kamoliddinov, I

    F. Kamoliddinov, I. U. Vakarelski, and S. T. Thoroddsen, Hydrodynamic regimes and drag on horizontally pulled floating spheres, Physics of Fluids33(2021)

    2021

  37. [45]

    R. Hunt, Z. Zhao, E. Silver, J. Yan, Y. Bazilevs, and D. M. Harris, Drag on a partially immersed sphere at the capillary scale, Physical Review Fluids8, 084003 (2023)

    2023

  38. [46]

    R. B. Suter, O. Rosenberg, S. Loeb, H. Wildman, and J. H. Long Jr, Locomotion on the water surface: propulsive mechanisms of the fisher spider dolomedes triton, Journal of Experimental Biology200, 2523 (1997)

    1997

  39. [47]

    Voise and J

    J. Voise and J. Casas, The management of fluid and wave resistances by whirligig beetles, Journal of The Royal Society Interface7, 343 (2010)

    2010

  40. [48]

    Pucci, I

    G. Pucci, I. Ho, and D. M. Harris, Friction on water sliders, Scientific Reports9, 4095 (2019)

    2019

  41. [49]

    L. Jami, G. T. Gustafson, T. Steinmann, M. Pi˜ neirua, and J. Casas, Overcoming drag at the water-air interface constrains body size in whirligig beetles, Fluids6, 249 (2021)

    2021

  42. [50]

    F. M. White and J. Majdalani,Viscous fluid flow, Vol. 3 (McGraw-Hill New York, 2006)

    2006

  43. [51]

    T. H. Havelock, Some cases of wave motion due to a submerged obstacle, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character93, 520 (1917)

    1917

  44. [52]

    Rapha¨ el and P.-G

    E. Rapha¨ el and P.-G. De Gennes, Capillary gravity waves caused by a moving disturbance: wave resistance, Physical Review E53, 3448 (1996)

    1996

  45. [53]

    Browaeys, J.-C

    J. Browaeys, J.-C. Bacri, R. Perzynski, and M. Shliomis, Capillary-gravity wave resistance in ordinary and magnetic fluids, Europhysics Letters53, 209 (2001)

    2001

  46. [54]

    Burghelea and V

    T. Burghelea and V. Steinberg, Onset of wave drag due to generation of capillary-gravity waves by a moving object as a critical phenomenon, Physical Review Letters86, 2557 (2001)

    2001

  47. [55]

    Burghelea and V

    T. Burghelea and V. Steinberg, Wave drag due to generation of capillary-gravity surface waves, Physical Review E66, 25 051204 (2002)

    2002

  48. [56]

    Le Merrer, C

    M. Le Merrer, C. Clanet, D. Qu´ er´ e,´E. Rapha¨ el, and F. Chevy, Wave drag on floating bodies, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences108, 15064 (2011)

    2011

  49. [57]

    Benzaquen, F

    M. Benzaquen, F. Chevy, and ´E. Rapha¨ el, Wave resistance for capillary gravity waves: Finite-size effects, Europhysics Letters96, 34003 (2011)

    2011

  50. [58]

    Bragg, A model illustrating intercrystalline boundaries and plastic flow in metals, Journal of Scientific Instruments19, 148 (1942)

    L. Bragg, A model illustrating intercrystalline boundaries and plastic flow in metals, Journal of Scientific Instruments19, 148 (1942)

    1942

  51. [59]

    W. L. Bragg and J. F. Nye, A dynamical model of a crystal structure, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences190, 474 (1947)

    1947

  52. [60]

    Nicolson, The interaction between floating particles, inMathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, Vol

    M. Nicolson, The interaction between floating particles, inMathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, Vol. 45 (Cambridge University Press, 1949) pp. 288–295

    1949

  53. [61]

    Voise, M

    J. Voise, M. Schindler, J. Casas, and E. Rapha¨ el, Capillary-based static self-assembly in higher organisms, Journal of The Royal Society Interface8, 1357 (2011)

    2011

  54. [62]

    Loudet and B

    J. Loudet and B. Pouligny, How do mosquito eggs self-assemble on the water surface?, The European Physical Journal E 34, 1 (2011)

    2011

  55. [63]

    H. Ko, M. Hadgu, K. Komilian, and D. L. Hu, Small fire ant rafts are unstable, Physical Review Fluids7, 090501 (2022)

    2022

  56. [64]

    D. L. Hu and J. W. Bush, Meniscus-climbing insects, Nature437, 733 (2005)

    2005

  57. [65]

    P. A. Kralchevsky, N. D. Denkov, and K. D. Danov, Particles with an undulated contact line at a fluid interface: interaction between capillary quadrupoles and rheology of particulate monolayers, Langmuir17, 7694 (2001)

    2001

  58. [66]

    Delens, Y

    M. Delens, Y. Collard, and N. Vandewalle, Induced capillary dipoles in floating particle assemblies, Physical Review Fluids8, 074001 (2023)

    2023

  59. [67]

    Dom ´ ınguez, M

    A. Dom ´ ınguez, M. Oettel, and S. Dietrich, Force balance of particles trapped at fluid interfaces, The Journal of Chemical Physics128(2008)

    2008

  60. [68]

    Mol´ aˇ cek and J

    J. Mol´ aˇ cek and J. W. Bush, Drops walking on a vibrating bath: towards a hydrodynamic pilot-wave theory, Journal of Fluid Mechanics727, 612 (2013)

    2013

  61. [69]

    A. U. Oza, R. R. Rosales, and J. W. Bush, A trajectory equation for walking droplets: hydrodynamic pilot-wave theory, Journal of Fluid Mechanics737, 552 (2013)

    2013

  62. [70]

    A. He, K. Nguyen, and S. Mandre, Capillary interactions between nearby interfacial objects, Europhysics Letters102, 38001 (2013)

    2013

  63. [71]

    Hooshanginejad, J.-W

    A. Hooshanginejad, J.-W. Barotta, V. Spradlin, G. Pucci, R. Hunt, and D. M. Harris, Interactions and pattern formation in a macroscopic magnetocapillary SALR system of mermaid cereal, Nature Communications15, 5466 (2024)

    2024

  64. [72]

    D. L. Hu, B. Chan, and J. W. Bush, The hydrodynamics of water strider locomotion, Nature424, 663 (2003)

    2003

  65. [73]

    B¨ uhler, Impulsive fluid forcing and water strider locomotion, Journal of Fluid Mechanics573, 211 (2007)

    O. B¨ uhler, Impulsive fluid forcing and water strider locomotion, Journal of Fluid Mechanics573, 211 (2007)

    2007

  66. [74]

    Gao and J

    P. Gao and J. J. Feng, A numerical investigation of the propulsion of water walkers, Journal of Fluid Mechanics668, 363 (2011)

    2011

  67. [75]

    Steinmann, M

    T. Steinmann, M. Arutkin, P. Cochard, E. Rapha¨ el, J. Casas, and M. Benzaquen, Unsteady wave pattern generation by water striders, Journal of Fluid Mechanics848, 370 (2018)

    2018

  68. [76]

    T. H. Havelock, Wave resistance: some cases of three-dimensional fluid motion, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character95, 354 (1919)

    1919

  69. [77]

    O’Donovan, M

    D. O’Donovan, M. Bustamante, O. Devauchelle, and G. Benham, Achieving optimal locomotion using self-generated waves, arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.11961 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Pucci, Faraday instability in floating drops out of equilibrium: Motion and self-propulsion from wave radiation stress, International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics75, 107 (2015)

    G. Pucci, Faraday instability in floating drops out of equilibrium: Motion and self-propulsion from wave radiation stress, International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics75, 107 (2015)

    2015

  71. [79]

    G. P. Benham, O. Devauchelle, and S. J. Thomson, On wave-driven propulsion–corrigendum, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1002, E1 (2025)

    2025

  72. [80]

    Metzmacher, Assembly and manipulation of floating components at liquid interfaces (2023)

    J. Metzmacher, Assembly and manipulation of floating components at liquid interfaces (2023)

    2023

  73. [81]

    R. S. Wilcox, Communication by surface waves: Mating behavior of a water strider (gerridae), Journal of Comparative Physiology80, 255 (1972)

    1972

  74. [82]

    H. H. Lang, Surface wave discrimination between prey and nonprey by the back swimmer notonecta glauca l.(hemiptera, heteroptera), Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology6, 233 (1980)

    1980

  75. [83]

    Voise and J

    J. Voise and J. Casas, Echolocation in whirligig beetles using surface waves: An unsubstantiated conjecture, inStudying Vibrational Communication(Springer, 2014) pp. 303–317

    2014

  76. [84]

    Couder, S

    Y. Couder, S. Protiere, E. Fort, and A. Boudaoud, Walking and orbiting droplets, Nature437, 208 (2005)

    2005

  77. [85]

    Protiere, A

    S. Protiere, A. Boudaoud, and Y. Couder, Particle–wave association on a fluid interface, Journal of Fluid Mechanics554, 85 (2006)

    2006

  78. [86]

    A. Eddi, E. Sultan, J. Moukhtar, E. Fort, M. Rossi, and Y. Couder, Information stored in Faraday waves: the origin of a path memory, Journal of Fluid Mechanics674, 433 (2011)

    2011

  79. [87]

    Ramananarivo, F

    S. Ramananarivo, F. Fang, A. Oza, J. Zhang, and L. Ristroph, Flow interactions lead to orderly formations of flapping wings in forward flight, Physical Review Fluids1, 071201 (2016)

    2016

  80. [88]

    P. C. Ormonde, M. Kurt, A. Mivehchi, and K. W. Moored, Two-dimensionally stable self-organisation arises in simple schooling swimmers through hydrodynamic interactions, Journal of Fluid Mechanics1000, A90 (2024)

    2024

  81. [89]

    J. A. Acebr´ on, L. L. Bonilla, C. J. P´ erez Vicente, F. Ritort, and R. Spigler, The Kuramoto model: A simple paradigm for synchronization phenomena, Reviews of Modern Physics77, 137 (2005). 26

    2005

  82. [90]

    K. P. O’Keeffe, H. Hong, and S. H. Strogatz, Oscillators that sync and swarm, Nature Communications8, 1504 (2017)

    2017

  83. [91]

    Baconnier, O

    P. Baconnier, O. Dauchot, V. D´ emery, G. D¨ uring, S. Henkes, C. Huepe, and A. Shee, Self-aligning polar active matter, Reviews of Modern Physics97, 015007 (2025)

    2025

  84. [92]

    Punzmann, N

    H. Punzmann, N. Francois, H. Xia, G. Falkovich, and M. Shats, Generation and reversal of surface flows by propagating waves, Nature Physics10, 658 (2014)

    2014

  85. [93]

    G. R. Chavarria, P. Le Gal, and M. Le Bars, Geometrical focusing of surface waves, Physical Review Fluids3, 094803 (2018)

    2018

  86. [94]

    Fontana, Wave-based liquid-interface metamaterials, Nature Communications8, 14325 (2017)

    P. Fontana, Wave-based liquid-interface metamaterials, Nature Communications8, 14325 (2017)

    2017

  87. [95]

    S. K. Chung, K. Ryu, and S. K. Cho, Electrowetting propulsion of water-floating objects, Applied Physics Letters95 (2009)

    2009

  88. [96]

    Yuan and S

    J. Yuan and S. K. Cho, Mechanism and flow measurement of AC electrowetting propulsion on free surface, Experiments in Fluids56, 1 (2015)

    2015

  89. [97]

    Bouvard, W

    J. Bouvard, W. Herreman, and F. Moisy, Mean mass transport in an orbitally shaken cylindrical container, Physical Review Fluids2, 084801 (2017)

    2017

  90. [98]

    M. Kim, D. M. Harris, and R. Cimpeanu, Computational modeling of fluid motion and mass transfer in a rocking bioreactor with application to cultivated meat production, International Journal of Multiphase Flow193, 105375 (2025)

    2025

  91. [99]

    S. Joo, S. Jung, S. Lee, R. H. Cowie, and D. Takagi, Freshwater snail feeding: lubrication-based particle collection on the water surface, Journal of the Royal Society Interface17, 20200139 (2020)

    2020

  92. [100]

    V. M. Parfenyev and S. S. Vergeles, Large-scale vertical vorticity generated by two crossing surface waves, Physical Review Fluids5, 094702 (2020)

    2020

  93. [101]

    A. P. Abella and M. N. Soriano, Measurement of Eulerian vorticity beneath rotating surface waves, Physica Scripta95, 085007 (2020)

    2020

  94. [102]

    T. S. van den Bremer and Ø. Breivik, Stokes drift, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences376, 20170104 (2018)

    2018

  95. [103]

    Filatov, V

    S. Filatov, V. Parfenyev, S. Vergeles, M. Y. Brazhnikov, A. Levchenko, and V. Lebedev, Nonlinear generation of vorticity by surface waves, Physical Review Letters116, 054501 (2016)

    2016

  96. [104]

    Riley, Steady streaming, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics33, 43 (2001)

    N. Riley, Steady streaming, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics33, 43 (2001)

    2001

  97. [105]

    Klotsa, K

    D. Klotsa, K. A. Baldwin, R. J. Hill, R. M. Bowley, and M. R. Swift, Propulsion of a two-sphere swimmer, Physical Review letters115, 248102 (2015)

    2015

  98. [106]

    B. Wang, Z. Che, C. Cheng, C. Tong, L. Shi, Y. Shen, K. Y. Bliokh, and J. Zi, Topological water-wave structures manipulating particles, Nature , 1 (2025)

    2025

  99. [107]

    Linton and P

    C. Linton and P. McIver, Mathematical techniques for wave/structure interactions (2001)

    2001

  100. [108]

    J. W. Miles, On surface-wave forcing by a circular disk, Journal of Fluid Mechanics175, 97 (1987)

    1987

  101. [109]

    Lamb,Hydrodynamics(University Press, 1924)

    H. Lamb,Hydrodynamics(University Press, 1924)

    1924

  102. [110]

    P. M. Sforza, Chapter 1 - propulsion principles and engine classification, inTheory of Aerospace Propulsion (Second Edition), Aerospace Engineering, edited by P. M. Sforza (Butterworth-Heinemann, 2017) second edition ed., pp. 1–52

    2017

  103. [111]

    Bolon, C

    B. Bolon, C. Pretot, C. Clanet, F. Larrarte, and R. Carmigniani, Drafting of two passive swimmer scale models for open-water races, Physical Review Fluids8, 094802 (2023)

    2023

  104. [112]

    Z.-M. Yuan, M. Chen, L. Jia, C. Ji, and A. Incecik, Wave-riding and wave-passing by ducklings in formation swimming, Journal of Fluid Mechanics928, R2 (2021)

    2021

  105. [113]

    D. L. Hu, M. Prakash, B. Chan, and J. W. Bush, Water-walking devices, Animal Locomotion , 131 (2010)

    2010

  106. [114]

    Y. Chen, N. Doshi, B. Goldberg, H. Wang, and R. J. Wood, Controllable water surface to underwater transition through electrowetting in a hybrid terrestrial-aquatic microrobot, Nature Communications9, 2495 (2018)

    2018

  107. [115]

    J. Ko, C. Kim, D. Kim, Y. Song, S. Lee, B. Yeom, J. Huh, S. Han, D. Kang, J.-S. Koh,et al., High-performance electrified hydrogel actuators based on wrinkled nanomembrane electrodes for untethered insect-scale soft aquabots, Science Robotics 7, eabo6463 (2022)

    2022

  108. [116]

    Hou, P.-C

    K.-X. Hou, P.-C. Zhao, and C.-H. Li, A light-driven actuator enables versatile motion for smart transportation and contactless delivery, Advanced Optical Materials11, 2202949 (2023)

    2023

  109. [117]

    Hartmann, M

    F. Hartmann, M. Baskaran, G. Raynaud, M. Benbedda, K. Mulleners, and H. Shea, Highly agile flat swimming robot, Science Robotics10, eadr0721 (2025)

    2025

  110. [118]

    K. Y. Lee, L. Wang, J. Qu, and K. R. Oldham, Milli-scale biped vibratory water strider, in2019 International Conference on Manipulation, Automation and Robotics at Small Scales (MARSS)(IEEE, 2019) pp. 1–6

    2019

  111. [119]

    Saintyves, M

    B. Saintyves, M. Spenko, and H. M. Jaeger, A self-organizing robotic aggregate using solid and liquid-like collective states, Science Robotics9, eadh4130 (2024)

    2024

  112. [120]

    Suzuki, H

    K. Suzuki, H. Takanobu, K. Noya, H. Koike, and H. Miura, Water strider robots with microfabricated hydrophobic legs, in2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems(IEEE, 2007) pp. 590–595

    2007

  113. [121]

    Becker, K

    F. Becker, K. Zimmermann, T. Volkova, and V. T. Minchenya, An amphibious vibration-driven microrobot with a piezoelectric actuator, Regular and Chaotic Dynamics18, 63 (2013)

    2013

  114. [122]

    D. Wang, Y. Liu, J. Deng, S. Zhang, J. Li, W. Wang, J. Liu, W. Chen, Q. Quan, G. Liu,et al., Miniature amphibious robot actuated by rigid-flexible hybrid vibration modules, Advanced Science9, 2203054 (2022)

    2022

  115. [123]

    Z. Ren, K. Ucak, Y. Yan, and M. Sitti, Undulatory propulsion at milliscale on water surface, Advanced Science11, 2309807 (2024)

    2024

  116. [124]

    Sherif and L

    A. Sherif and L. Ristroph, Hydrodynamic tweezing: Using water waves to push and pull, Physical Review Fluids5, 110512 (2020). 27

    2020

  117. [125]

    K. J. Bishop, S. L. Biswal, and B. Bharti, Active colloids as models, materials, and machines, Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering14, 1 (2023)

    2023

  118. [126]

    Liebchen and D

    B. Liebchen and D. Levis, Chiral active matter, Europhysics Letters139, 67001 (2022)

    2022

  119. [127]

    Elgeti, R

    J. Elgeti, R. G. Winkler, and G. Gompper, Physics of microswimmers—single particle motion and collective behavior: a review, Reports on Progress in Physics78, 056601 (2015)

    2015

  120. [128]

    M. E. Cates and J. Tailleur, Motility-induced phase separation, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics6, 219 (2015)

    2015

  121. [129]

    M. J. Bowick, N. Fakhri, M. C. Marchetti, and S. Ramaswamy, Symmetry, thermodynamics, and topology in active matter, Physical Review X12, 010501 (2022)

    2022

  122. [130]

    Liebchen and D

    B. Liebchen and D. Levis, Collective behavior of chiral active matter: Pattern formation and enhanced flocking, Physical Review Letters119, 058002 (2017)

    2017

  123. [131]

    Vicsek, A

    T. Vicsek, A. Czir´ ok, E. Ben-Jacob, I. Cohen, and O. Shochet, Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles, Physical Review Letters75, 1226 (1995)

    1995

  124. [132]

    Supekar, B

    R. Supekar, B. Song, A. Hastewell, G. P. Choi, A. Mietke, and J. Dunkel, Learning hydrodynamic equations for active matter from particle simulations and experiments, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences120, e2206994120 (2023)

    2023

  125. [133]

    Bricard, J.-B

    A. Bricard, J.-B. Caussin, N. Desreumaux, O. Dauchot, and D. Bartolo, Emergence of macroscopic directed motion in populations of motile colloids, Nature503, 95 (2013)

    2013

  126. [134]

    B. C. Van Zuiden, J. Paulose, W. T. Irvine, D. Bartolo, and V. Vitelli, Spatiotemporal order and emergent edge currents in active spinner materials, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences113, 12919 (2016)

    2016

  127. [135]

    Adorj´ ani and A

    B. Adorj´ ani and A. Lib´ al, Motility-induced phase separation and frustration in active matter swarmalators, Physical Review E109, 024607 (2024)

    2024

  128. [136]

    Workamp, G

    M. Workamp, G. Ramirez, K. E. Daniels, and J. A. Dijksman, Symmetry-reversals in chiral active matter, Soft Matter 14, 5572 (2018)

    2018

  129. [137]

    Zampetaki, Y

    A. Zampetaki, Y. Yang, H. L¨ owen, and C. P. Royall, Dynamical order and many-body correlations in zebrafish show that three is a crowd, Nature Communications15, 2591 (2024)

    2024

  130. [138]

    Filella, F

    A. Filella, F. Nadal, C. Sire, E. Kanso, and C. Eloy, Model of collective fish behavior with hydrodynamic interactions, Physical Review Letters120, 198101 (2018)

    2018

  131. [139]

    Scholz, M

    C. Scholz, M. Engel, and T. P¨ oschel, Rotating robots move collectively and self-organize, Nature Communications9, 931 (2018)

    2018

  132. [140]

    Deseigne, O

    J. Deseigne, O. Dauchot, and H. Chat´ e, Collective motion of vibrated polar disks, Physical Review Letters105, 098001 (2010)

    2010

  133. [141]

    Briand and O

    G. Briand and O. Dauchot, Crystallization of self-propelled hard discs, Physical Review Letters117, 098004 (2016)

    2016

  134. [142]

    Scholz, S

    C. Scholz, S. Jahanshahi, A. Ldov, and H. L¨ owen, Inertial delay of self-propelled particles, Nature Communications9, 5156 (2018)

    2018

  135. [143]

    Noirhomme, I

    M. Noirhomme, I. Mammadli, N. Vanesse, J. Pande, A.-S. Smith, and N. Vandewalle, Brainbots as smart autonomous active particles with programmable motion, Physical Review Applied23, 064008 (2025)

    2025

  136. [144]

    Dauchot and V

    O. Dauchot and V. D´ emery, Dynamics of a self-propelled particle in a harmonic trap, Physical Review Letters122, 068002 (2019)

    2019

  137. [145]

    P. Chen, S. Weady, S. Atis, T. Matsuzawa, M. J. Shelley, and W. T. Irvine, Self-propulsion, flocking and chiral active phases from particles spinning at intermediate reynolds numbers, Nature Physics21, 146 (2025)

    2025

  138. [146]

    Dombrowski, H

    T. Dombrowski, H. Nguyen, and D. Klotsa, Pairwise interactions between model swimmers at intermediate Reynolds numbers, Physical Review Fluids7, 074401 (2022)

    2022

  139. [147]

    Gelvan, A

    M. Gelvan, A. Chirko, J. Kirpitch, Y. Lavie, N. Israel, and N. Oppenheimer, Hydrodynamic spin-pairing and active polymerization of oppositely spinning rotors, arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.07554 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  140. [148]

    E. M. King, M. C. Morrell, J. B. Sustiel, M. Gronert, H. Pastor, and D. G. Grier, Scattered waves fuel emergent activity, Physical Review Research7, 013055 (2025)

    2025

  141. [149]

    B. Wu, Q. Mao, B. VanSaders, and H. M. Jaeger, Non-reciprocity and multibody interactions in acoustically levitated particle systems: A three body problem, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.12327 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  142. [150]

    Sharma, I

    J. Sharma, I. Tiwari, D. Das, and P. Parmananda, Chimeralike states in a minimal network of active camphor ribbons, Physical Review E103, 012214 (2021)

    2021

  143. [151]

    L¨ owen, Inertial effects of self-propelled particles: From active Brownian to active Langevin motion, The Journal of Chemical Physics152(2020)

    H. L¨ owen, Inertial effects of self-propelled particles: From active Brownian to active Langevin motion, The Journal of Chemical Physics152(2020)

    2020

  144. [152]

    M. Y. Ben Zion, J. Fersula, N. Bredeche, and O. Dauchot, Morphological computation and decentralized learning in a swarm of sterically interacting robots, Science Robotics8, eabo6140 (2023)

    2023

  145. [153]

    N. H. Nguyen, D. Klotsa, M. Engel, and S. C. Glotzer, Emergent collective phenomena in a mixture of hard shapes through active rotation, Physical Review Letters112, 075701 (2014)

    2014

  146. [154]

    H. L. Devereux, C. R. Twomey, M. S. Turner, and S. Thutupalli, Whirligig beetles as corralled active Brownian particles, Journal of the Royal Society Interface18, 20210114 (2021)

    2021

  147. [155]

    K. J. Welch, I. Hastings-Hauss, R. Parthasarathy, and E. I. Corwin, Ballistic and diffusive dynamics in a two-dimensional ideal gas of macroscopic chaotic faraday waves, Physical Review E89, 042143 (2014)

    2014

  148. [156]

    H. Xia, N. Francois, H. Punzmann, and M. Shats, Tunable diffusion in wave-driven two-dimensional turbulence, Journal of Fluid Mechanics865, 811 (2019)

    2019

  149. [157]

    Faraday, Xvii

    M. Faraday, Xvii. on a peculiar class of acoustical figures; and on certain forms assumed by groups of particles upon 28 vibrating elastic surfaces, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London , 299 (1831)

  150. [158]

    W. S. Edwards and S. Fauve, Patterns and quasi-patterns in the Faraday experiment, Journal of Fluid Mechanics278, 123 (1994)

    1994

  151. [159]

    R. W. Perry, M. C. Holmes-Cerfon, M. P. Brenner, and V. N. Manoharan, Two-dimensional clusters of colloidal spheres: Ground states, excited states, and structural rearrangements, Physical Review Letters114, 228301 (2015)

    2015

  152. [160]

    M. X. Lim, A. Souslov, V. Vitelli, and H. M. Jaeger, Cluster formation by acoustic forces and active fluctuations in levitated granular matter, Nature Physics15, 460 (2019)

    2019

  153. [161]

    J. Yang, M. Davoodianidalik, H. Xia, H. Punzmann, M. Shats, and N. Francois, Passive propulsion in turbulent flows, Physical Review Fluids4, 104608 (2019)

    2019

  154. [162]

    Francois, H

    N. Francois, H. Xia, H. Punzmann, and M. Shats, Rectification of chaotic fluid motion in two-dimensional turbulence, Physical Review Fluids3, 124602 (2018)

    2018

  155. [163]

    Vandewalle, L

    N. Vandewalle, L. Clermont, D. Terwagne, S. Dorbolo, E. Mersch, and G. Lumay, Symmetry breaking in a few-body system with magnetocapillary interactions, Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics85, 041402 (2012)

    2012

  156. [164]

    C. P. Royall, Hunting mermaids in real space: Known knowns, known unknowns and unknown unknowns, Soft Matter 14, 4020 (2018)

    2018

  157. [165]

    P. R. Kaneelil, J. P. de Souza, G. Turk, A. A. Pahlavan, and H. A. Stone, Electrically mediated self-assembly and manipulation of drops at an interface, Soft Matter20, 5417 (2024)

    2024

  158. [166]

    Perrard, M

    S. Perrard, M. Labousse, M. Miskin, E. Fort, and Y. Couder, Self-organization into quantized eigenstates of a classical wave-driven particle, Nature Communications5, 3219 (2014)

    2014

  159. [167]

    Grosjean, M

    G. Grosjean, M. Hubert, Y. Collard, A. Sukhov, J. Harting, A.-S. Smith, and N. Vandewalle, Capillary assemblies in a rotating magnetic field, Soft Matter15, 9093 (2019)

    2019

  160. [168]

    C. O. Reichhardt, Depinning and nonequilibrium dynamic phases of particle assemblies driven over random and ordered substrates: a review, Reports on Progress in Physics80, 026501 (2016)

    2016

  161. [169]

    Canavello, C

    D. Canavello, C. Reichhardt, C. C. de Souza Silva, and C. Reichhardt, Polarization and dynamic phases of aligning active matter in periodic obstacle arrays, Soft Matter (2025)

    2025

  162. [170]

    Volpe, I

    G. Volpe, I. Buttinoni, D. Vogt, H.-J. K¨ ummerer, and C. Bechinger, Microswimmers in patterned environments, Soft Matter7, 8810 (2011)

    2011

  163. [171]

    A. J. Abraham, S. Malkov, F. A. Ljubetic, M. Durey, and P. J. S´ aenz, Anderson localization of walking droplets, Physical Review X14, 031047 (2024)

    2024

  164. [172]

    Farhadi, S

    S. Farhadi, S. Machaca, J. Aird, B. O. T. Maldonado, S. Davis, P. E. Arratia, and D. J. Durian, Dynamics and thermo- dynamics of air-driven active spinners, Soft Matter14, 5588 (2018)

    2018

  165. [173]

    S. Sur, N. Uvanovic, H. Masoud, and J. P. Rothstein, The effect of shape on the motion and stability of Marangoni surfers, Journal of Fluids Engineering143, 011301 (2021)

    2021

  166. [174]

    J. K. Wilt, N. Schramma, J.-W. Bottermans, and M. Jalaal, ActiveCheerios: 3D-printed Marangoni-driven active particles at an interface, arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.16011 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  167. [175]

    Huang, N

    C. Huang, N. P. Pinchin, C.-H. Lin, I. H. Tejedor, M. G. Scarfo, H. Shahsavan, and A. Pena-Francesch, Self-propelled morphing matter for small-scale swimming soft robots, Advanced Functional Materials34, 2413129 (2024)

    2024

  168. [176]

    Biswas, J

    A. Biswas, J. Cruz, P. Parmananda, and D. Das, First passage of an active particle in the presence of passive crowders, Soft Matter16, 6138 (2020)

    2020

  169. [177]

    Upadhyaya and V

    A. Upadhyaya and V. Akella, Stochastic migrations of Marangoni surfers between two lobes of a dumbbell-shaped con- finement, Soft Matter20, 8775 (2024)

    2024

  170. [178]

    Tiwari and P

    I. Tiwari and P. Parmananda, How to capture active Marangoni surfers, Soft Matter19, 2710 (2023)

    2023

  171. [179]

    N. J. Suematsu, S. Nakata, A. Awazu, and H. Nishimori, Collective behavior of inanimate boats, Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics81, 056210 (2010)

    2010

  172. [180]

    Heisler, N

    E. Heisler, N. J. Suematsu, A. Awazu, and H. Nishimori, Swarming of self-propelled camphor boats, Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics85, 055201 (2012)

    2012

  173. [181]

    Sharma, I

    J. Sharma, I. Tiwari, D. Das, P. Parmananda, V. Akella, and V. Pimienta, Rotational synchronization of camphor ribbons, Physical Review E99, 012204 (2019)

    2019

  174. [182]

    G. T. Silva and H. Bruus, Acoustic interaction forces between small particles in an ideal fluid, Physical Review E90, 063007 (2014)

    2014

  175. [183]

    B. Wu, B. VanSaders, M. X. Lim, and H. M. Jaeger, Hydrodynamic coupling melts acoustically levitated crystalline rafts, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences120, e2301625120 (2023)

    2023

  176. [184]

    N. St. Clair, D. Davenport, A. D. Kim, and D. Kleckner, Dynamics of acoustically bound particles, Physical Review Research5, 013051 (2023)

    2023

  177. [185]

    B. Wu, E. P. Esposito, Q. Mao, and H. M. Jaeger, Pattern formation in acoustically levitated particle systems with competing near-field interactions, Physical Review Research7, 023017 (2025)

    2025

  178. [186]

    S. Shi, M. C. H¨ ubl, G. P. Grosjean, C. P. Goodrich, and S. R. Waitukaitis, Electrostatics overcome acoustic collapse to assemble, adapt, and activate levitated matter, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.01739 (2025)

    2025

  179. [187]

    Young, The bakerian lecture

    T. Young, The bakerian lecture. experiments and calculations relative to physical optics, inAbstracts of the Papers Printed in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1 (The Royal Society London, 1832) pp. 131–132

  180. [188]

    Berry, R

    M. Berry, R. Chambers, M. Large, C. Upstill, and J. Walmsley, Wavefront dislocations in the Aharonov-Bohm effect and its water wave analogue, European Journal of Physics1, 154 (1980)

    1980

  181. [189]

    Proti` ere, A

    S. Proti` ere, A. Boudaoud, and Y. Couder, Particle-wave association on a fluid interface, Journal of Fluid Mechanics554, 85 (2006). 29

    2006

  182. [190]

    Couder and E

    Y. Couder and E. Fort, Single-particle diffraction and interference at a macroscopic scale, Physical Review Letters97, 154101 (2006)

    2006

  183. [191]

    J. W. M. Bush, Pilot-wave hydrodynamics, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics47, 269 (2015)

    2015

  184. [192]

    J. W. M. Bush and A. U. Oza, Hydrodynamic quantum analogs, Reports on Progress in Physics84, 017001 (2020)

    2020

  185. [193]

    P. J. S´ aenz, G. Pucci, S. E. Turton, A. Goujon, R. R. Rosales, J. Dunkel, and J. W. Bush, Emergent order in hydrodynamic spin lattices, Nature596, 58 (2021)

    2021

  186. [194]

    R. N. Valani and D. M. Paganin, Hydrodynamic nuclear analogs with active wave-particle clusters, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.07201 (2025)

    2025

  187. [195]

    D. M. Harris and J. W. Bush, Generating uniaxial vibration with an electrodynamic shaker and external air bearing, Journal of Sound and Vibration334, 255 (2015)

    2015

  188. [196]

    A. U. Oza, E. Si´ efert, D. M. Harris, J. Mol´ aˇ cek, and J. W. Bush, Orbiting pairs of walking droplets: Dynamics and stability, Physical Review Fluids2, 053601 (2017)

    2017

  189. [197]

    Wind-Willassen, J

    Ø. Wind-Willassen, J. Mol´ aˇ cek, D. M. Harris, and J. W. Bush, Exotic states of bouncing and walking droplets, Physics of Fluids25(2013)

    2013

  190. [198]

    Le Gal, B

    P. Le Gal, B. C. Morales, S. Hernandez-Zapata, and G. R. Chavarria, Swimming of a ludion in a stratified sea, Journal of Fluid Mechanics931, A14 (2022)

    2022

  191. [199]

    Gsell and P

    S. Gsell and P. Le Gal, Pilot-wave hydrodynamics of a particle in a density-stratified fluid, arXiv preprint arXiv:22501.04402 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  192. [200]

    Roux, J.-P

    A. Roux, J.-P. Martischang, and M. Baudoin, Self-radiation force on a moving monopolar source, Journal of Fluid Mechanics952, A22 (2022)

    2022

  193. [201]

    Martischang, A

    J.-P. Martischang, A. Roux, and M. Baudoin, Acoustic dipole surfing on its own acoustic field: toward acoustic quantum analogues, arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.06642 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  194. [202]

    Liu and X

    X. Liu and X. Wang, Polygonal patterns of faraday water waves analogous to collective excitations in bose–einstein condensates, Nature Physics20, 287 (2024)

    2024

  195. [203]

    Barona Balda, A

    A. Barona Balda, A. Argun, A. Callegari, and G. Volpe, Playing with active matter, American Journal of Physics92, 847 (2024)

    2024

  196. [204]

    D. M. Harris, J. Quintela, V. Prost, P.-T. Brun, and J. W. Bush, Visualization of hydrodynamic pilot-wave phenomena, Journal of Visualization20, 13 (2017)

    2017

  197. [205]

    I. Ho, A. H. Kumar, and D. M. Harris, Reconfigurable mechanical vibrations laboratory kit, Journal of Open Hardware 6(2022)

    2022

  198. [206]

    A. Eddi, P. Baconnier, M. Blons, S. Pautrel, S. Proti` ere, and E. Fort, Experimental teaching—a tribute to Yves Couder by the example: stroboscopy and fluorescence lifetime with a fan, Comptes Rendus. M´ ecanique348, 439 (2020)

    2020

  199. [207]

    D. M. Harris, K. Schlueter-Kuck, E. Austin, and K. Cohen, Course-based undergraduate research in upper-level engineer- ing electives: A case study., Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research22, 46 (2021)

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.