Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 63 references

Closed Estimates of Leray Projected Transport Noise and Strong Solutions of the Stochastic Euler Equations

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper establishes closed estimates for Leray-projected transport noise and proves the first local strong solutions of the 3D stochastic Euler equations in velocity form, with blow-up in the W^{1,∞} norm as the only obstruction.

desk verdict Closed Leray-projected noise estimates are a genuinely new analytic result; the existence theorem they power is plausible but conditional on several load-bearing delegated arguments. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.00787 v1 pith:CVRF7BO5 submitted 2025-07-01 math.AP math.PR

Daniel Goodair This is my paper
classification math.APmath.PR MSC 35Q3160H1535R6076B03
keywords stochasticEulerequationstransportnoiseLerayprojectorstrongsolutionsblow-upcriteriontransport-stretchingSobolevestimatesStratonovich
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves closed a priori bounds for the noise terms that appear when the incompressible Euler and Navier-Stokes equations on the three-dimensional torus are projected by the Leray projector and rewritten in Itô form. The central difficulty is that the projector sits between copies of the transport operator, so the top-order derivatives no longer cancel as they do without projection; this has blocked velocity-level estimates for pure transport noise. The author closes the estimates for every integer Sobolev order and the equivalent Stokes spaces by rewriting the transport operator as a transport-stretching operator minus a zero-order stretching term and exploiting that the stretching part moves past the projector on divergence-free fields. These bounds yield the first local strong solutions of the stochastic Euler equation with transport noise, together with a unique maximal solution whose lifetime is exactly the integrability of the $W^{{1,∞}}$ norm of the velocity. A reader should care because transport noise at the velocity level is the form derived from stochastic model reduction, and the velocity-level estimates were the missing ingredient for strong solutions.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the algebra of the Leray projector $P$ with the transport operator $L_\xi f=(\xi\cdot\nabla)f$ and the transport-stretching operator $B_\xi f=L_\xi f+T_\xi f$, where $T_\xi f=(f\cdot\nabla)\xi$. The load-bearing identities are $PB_\xi=PB_\xi P$ for divergence-free $\xi$, since $B_\xi$ maps gradients to gradients, and $L_\xi=B_\xi-T_\xi$ with $T_\xi$ of zero order; Lemma 2.2 then symmetrises pairs of derivatives so that top derivatives cancel via $L^*_{\xi}=-L_\xi$, $B_\xi+B^*_\xi=T_\xi+T^*_\xi$, and first-order commutators, giving closed bounds with no loss of derivatives. The same identities are used a second time in the transport case, where the projector remains in the middle of $PL_{\xi_i}PL_{\xi_i}$ and the stretching term is inserted and removed to let the projector pass.

What would settle it

The decisive object is the remainder $(PB_\xi-PB_\xi P)f$. For a divergence-free $\xi$ this remainder is identically zero; for a noise field with a gradient part it need not vanish. A concrete check is to take $\xi=\nabla\psi$ on the torus and a divergence-free Fourier mode $f_0=e^{ik\cdot x}a$ with $k\cdot a=0$, and compute $\|(PB_\xi-PB_\xi P)f_0\|_{W^{m,2}}$; a positive value for any $\psi,f_0$ would show exactly where the cancellation that closes the estimates relies on the divergence-free assumption, while its absence across all such examples would suggest the condition can be relaxed.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that for noise fields $\xi_i$ that are divergence-free and sufficiently smooth, and for any divergence-free $f$, the Itô-Stratonovich corrector and quadratic-variation contributions satisfy $\langle (PG_i)^2 f, f\rangle + \|PG_i f\|^2 \le c\|\xi_i\|^2_{W^{m+2,\infty}}\|f\|^2$ in both $W^{m,2}$ and $A^{m/2}$ norms, for every integer $m\ge 0$. From this, Theorem 1.5 follows: for $m\ge 3$ and any $\mathcal{F}_0$-measurable initial condition in $W^{m,2}_\sigma$, there is a unique maximal $W^{m,2}_\sigma$-strong solution of the stochastic Euler equation with $G_i=B_i$ or $G_i=L_{\xi_i}$; when the maximal time $\Theta$ is finite, $\int_0^\Theta \|u_s\|_{W^{1,\infty}}\,ds=\infty$; and each local solution satisfies the original Stratonovich equation in $L^2_\sigma$, not merely the Itô form.

Load-bearing premise

The whole estimate chain assumes each noise field $\xi_i$ is divergence-free (plus enough smoothness), because the proof repeatedly moves the Leray projector across the transport-stretching operator through the identity $PB_\xi=PB_\xi P$; if a noise field carries a nonzero gradient part, that identity fails and the top-order cancellation that closes the estimates is lost.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For $m\ge 3$, the stochastic Euler equation with transport noise admits unique local strong $W^{m,2}_\sigma$ solutions, a first for velocity-level transport noise.
  • Any such solution extends as long as $\int \|u\|_{W^{1,\infty}}\,dt$ stays finite; explosion in that integral is the only obstruction to global existence.
  • The inviscid limit of stochastic Navier-Stokes strong solutions converges pathwise to the stochastic Euler solution, so the estimates are stable as the viscosity tends to zero.
  • Higher Sobolev regularity of the initial data persists on the whole lifetime of the solution, not just for the minimal regularity class.
  • Local solutions genuinely satisfy the Stratonovich equation in $L^2_\sigma$, resolving the derivative-cost issue that plagues weaker formulations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The add-and-subtract-the-stretching trick is not tied to the torus: it should adapt to any projector and any 'B-like' operator that preserves gradients, including hydrostatic or bounded-domain variants, as long as an analogue of $PB_\xi=PB_\xi P$ holds.
  • Because the bounds close at arbitrary integer order, they open the door to higher-order well-posedness and regularity-propagation questions for transport noise that were previously approachable only in vorticity form.
  • The $W^{1,\infty}$ blow-up criterion is stated in the paper as the natural velocity-level analogue; whether it is sharp, meaning whether a solution can blow up with exactly finite $\int\|u\|_{W^{1,\infty}}\,dt$, is left open and is a concrete testable question.
  • One could test numerically whether the constants in Proposition 1.1 degrade gracefully as $m$ grows; if they grow fast, practical use of high-order regularity may require tracking the dependence on $m$ explicitly.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the 3D incompressible Euler and Navier-Stokes equations on the torus with Stratonovich transport or transport-stretching noise. The first part of the paper proves closed a priori estimates for the Leray-projected noise terms in both the Sobolev norms W^{m,2} and the Stokes norms A^{m/2} (Proposition 1.1, proved in Propositions 2.1-2.5). The second part uses these estimates to construct local strong solutions of the stochastic Euler equation by an inviscid limit of stochastic Navier-Stokes approximations, and then to prove uniqueness, maximality, a blow-up criterion in L^1([0,T];W^{1,\infty}), and the Stratonovich identity (Theorem 1.5). The paper's main claim is that for divergence-free noise fields with sufficient smoothness and any F0-measurable initial condition in W^{m,2}_\sigma, there is a unique maximal W^{m,2}_\sigma-strong solution, and if the maximal time is finite then the W^{1,\infty} norm blows up in L^1.

Significance. The closed estimates in Section 2 address a genuinely known difficulty: the Leray projector does not commute with the transport operator L_\xi, which prevents the usual top-order cancellation in energy estimates. The strategy of adding and subtracting the stretching term T_\xi is natural and appears to work, and the detailed algebra in Lemma 2.2 is a real strength. If the later solution-theoretic steps are fully justified, Theorem 1.5 would be a substantial advance: it would provide the first local strong solutions for the stochastic Euler equation with non-stretching transport noise, higher-order regularity on the solution lifetime, and a blow-up criterion in velocity form. The estimates are parameter-free in the sense that the constants depend only on explicit norms of the noise fields, with no fitted parameters or normalization forcing. However, the proof as written is conditional on several delegated arguments, most importantly the inviscid-limit passage for transport noise, so the significance is tempered by the need to verify those steps.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.4, Proposition 3.5] The inviscid limit for transport noise is not proved in the manuscript. After establishing convergence in C([0,T];W^{m-3,2}) in Lemma 3.4, the text refers to [39, Prop. 3.5] for the transport-stretching case and states that the transport case 'follows in exactly the same way given the estimates of Proposition 2.5, so we omit further details.' This is the step at which one must identify the limits of PL u^n u^n, of the stochastic integral ∫ P L_{\xi_i} u^n dW^i, and of the Itô-Stratonovich corrector ∫ (P L_{\xi_i})^2 u^n ds. Since [39, Prop. 3.5] concerns B_i, where the identity P B_i = P B_i P is available, the transport case is not a formal corollary of Proposition 2.5; the missing commutation is precisely the obstruction highlighted in the introduction. The existence half of Theorem 1.5 for G_i = L_{\xi_i} is therefore conditional unless this passage is supplied or replaced by a reference that covers the transport case with all hypotheses checked.
  2. [§3.6, Proposition 3.7] Uniqueness of local W^{m,2}-strong solutions is asserted by reference to 'Uniqueness of weak solutions to the 2D stochastic Navier-Stokes equation... was shown in [41] Proposition 3.10. Given the additional regularity on solutions here our task is simpler and contained in the proof from [41], hence we omit the details.' For the stochastic Euler equation, uniqueness of strong solutions is not an immediate consequence of 2D Navier-Stokes weak uniqueness: the difference of two solutions satisfies an equation with a quadratic nonlinearity that must be controlled in W^{m,2} using (16), and the noise terms require the estimates of Propositions 2.3 and 2.5 for P L_{\xi_i}. None of these estimates for the difference are written. Since uniqueness is part of Theorem 1.5, this omission is load-bearing.
  3. [§3.5, Proposition 3.6] The regularity improvement from W^{m-3,2} to W^{m',2} is delegated: the two claimed properties are said to be 'near identical' to Proposition 3.2 and Lemma 3.3. In particular, the proof must show that the Itô formula can be applied in W^{m',2} for the regularised Euler solutions, that the noise estimates of Propositions 2.3 and 2.5 are available at that level, and that the analogue of (54) holds with P_{n'}u_0 - P_{j'}u_0 replacing the viscous term. The text only states these properties and does not verify the W^{m',2} energy estimates. This step is what produces C([0,T];W^{m,2}) regularity in Theorem 1.5, so it needs to be written out.
  4. [§3.7, proof of (74)] The uniform estimate (74) that yields (66) is not proved. The text says the proof is 'very close' to that of (45) and concludes 'We content ourselves with this as a proof of (74).' The application of the stochastic Gronwall lemma A.3 requires (i) the bound ∫_0^t η_s ds ≤ c' P-a.s. for η_s = ||u^n_s||_{W^{1,∞}} on the stopped process, and (ii) the inequality (51) for arbitrary stopping times θ_j < θ_k. Neither is verified explicitly. Since (66) is the input to the blow-up criterion ∫_0^Θ ||u_s||_{W^{1,∞}} ds = ∞, this part of Theorem 1.5 is conditional on an omitted argument.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3.1, Eq. (44)] In the definition of τ^M_n, the expression 'sup_{r∈[0,s]} ||u^n_r||^2_{W^{m-3,2}} dr' contains a spurious 'dr' that makes the condition ill-formed; it should be 'sup_{r∈[0,s]} ||u^n_r||^2_{W^{m-3,2}} ≥ M + ||u_0||^2_{W^{m-3,2}}'.
  2. [§3.4, proof of Proposition 3.5] The identification of L^2(Ω; L∞([0,T];W^{m-1,2}_σ)) with the dual of L^2(Ω; L^1([0,T];W^{m-1,2}_σ)) is incorrect; the predual should be L^2(Ω; L^1([0,T];W^{-(m-1),2}_σ)). This is likely a sign typo, but as written the duality statement is false.
  3. [Appendix] There is a stray 'Hello' between the Appendix heading and the first result; it should be removed.
  4. [§1.4, Theorem 1.5] The assumptions on the noise fields in Theorem 1.5, namely ξ_i ∈ W^{m+6,∞} with ∑ ||ξ_i||^2_{W^{m+5,∞}} < ∞, are stronger than the W^{m+2,∞} assumptions in Proposition 1.1; a sentence explaining where the extra five derivatives are consumed (e.g., in Proposition 3.1 with m+3) would help the reader.
  5. [§1.1, Eqs. (12)-(13)] The multi-index notation in (12) and (13) is typeset ambiguously: 'k_{m-1/2}' and 'k_{m/2}' should be displayed as \(k_{\frac{m-1}{2}}\) and \(k_{\frac{m}{2}}\) to avoid confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the new noise estimates are proven in-paper, and the cited same-author results are external lemmas, not the target conclusion.

full rationale

The central analytic input, Proposition 1.1, is derived in Sections 2.1 and 2.2 from operator identities and direct commutator/energy computations; for example, the transport case is reduced to the stretching case via L = B - T and uses the divergence-free identity P B_xi = P B_xi P (cited to [40] Lemma 2.7), an algebraic identity whose assumptions (xi_i in L^2_sigma) do not include the target estimate. No parameter is fitted, no norm being bounded is used in the definition of the bound, and no previously known estimate is merely relabeled. The Section 3 solution theory does lean heavily on same-author results: Proposition 3.1 cites [36]-[37] for Navier-Stokes existence, Lemma 3.4 uses [38]'s abstract Cauchy theorem, and Proposition 3.5 states 'For this we refer to [39] Proposition 3.5, where the inviscid limit of Navier-Stokes with transport-stretching noise is shown to satisfy the stochastic Euler equation weakly under a much weaker topology of convergence. The transport noise case follows in exactly the same way given the estimates of Proposition 2.5, so we omit further details.' Uniqueness and maximality are likewise cited to [41]-[42], with Proposition 3.7 saying 'we omit the details' and Lemma 3.9 saying 'We content ourselves with this as a proof of (74)'. These are real completeness and verification gaps for the transport-noise inviscid limit, but they are not circularity: [39] proves a different Navier-Stokes-to-Euler passage, [41]-[42] are abstract or 2D results whose assumptions do not include Theorem 1.5, and the new Proposition 2.5 is exactly the missing estimate needed to rerun those arguments. The novelty of the paper, the closed control of the Leray-projected noise terms, is self-contained and does not reduce by construction to its inputs. The verdict therefore is no significant circularity, with the caveat that some Section 3 passages are delegated rather than written out.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new constants, particles, or fields; it relies on the existing Itô-Stratonovich corrector and the standard Itô-Stokes drift. The ledger is dominated by imported analytic machinery, often from the same author's prior papers, but not by fitted parameters.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The noise fields ξ_i are divergence-free elements of L^2_σ with specified Sobolev regularity, and the initial condition lies in W^{m,2}_σ.
    Stated in Subsection 1.3 and Theorem 1.5; the entire construction takes place in divergence-free subspaces.
  • domain assumption P B_i = P B_i P, and the boundedness estimates (17)-(19) for T, L, B operators from [40].
    Used in Lemma 2.2 and Proposition 2.4 to move the Leray projector; this is the crucial structural input that makes the estimates close.
  • standard math Infinite-dimensional Itô formula, Burkholder-Davis-Gundy inequality, and the Itô-Stratonovich conversion theorem of [42].
    Used throughout Section 3 for energy identities and for the final conversion to genuine Stratonovich form.
  • domain assumption Abstract Cauchy convergence Proposition A.2 from [38] and stochastic Gronwall Lemma A.3 from [33].
    These external theorems are imported verbatim to build the limiting process and to control the blow-up arguments.
  • domain assumption Existence and uniqueness of local strong solutions for the approximating stochastic Navier-Stokes equations from [36] and [37].
    Proposition 3.1 explicitly rests on [36] Proposition 3.7 and [37] Theorem 2.9 for both noise cases.
  • domain assumption The spatial domain is the three-dimensional torus, so the Leray projector commutes with derivatives.
    This is used repeatedly in the Stokes-space estimates, e.g. in Proposition 2.1, and is not valid on bounded domains.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Closed Estimates of Leray Projected Transport Noise and Strong Solutions of the Stochastic Euler Equations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CVRF7BO5

@misc{pith2026250700787,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Closed Estimates of Leray Projected Transport Noise and Strong Solutions of the Stochastic Euler Equations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CVRF7BO5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.00787}
}
abstract

We consider the incompressible Euler and Navier-Stokes equations on the three dimensional torus, in velocity form, perturbed by a transport or transport-stretching Stratonovich noise. Closed control of the noise contributions in energy estimates are demonstrated, for any positive integer ordered Sobolev Space and the equivalent Stokes Space; difficulty arises due to the presence of the Leray Projector disrupting cancellation of the top order derivative. This is particularly pertinent in the case of a transport noise without stretching, where the vorticity form cannot be used. As a consequence we obtain, for the first time, the existence of a local strong solution to the corresponding stochastic Euler equation. Furthermore, smooth solutions are shown to exist until blow-up in $L^1\left([0,T];W^{1,\infty}\right)$.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [17]

    Journal of Functional Analysis 283(9), 109,632 (2022)

    Crisan, D., Holm, D.D., Leahy, J.M., Nilssen, T.: Solution properties of the incompressible Euler system with rough path advection. Journal of Functional Analysis 283(9), 109,632 (2022)

    work page 2022

  2. [36]

    High Order Smoothness for Stochastic Navier-Stokes Equations with Transport and Stretching Noise on Bounded Domains

    Goodair, D.: High Order Smoothness for Stochastic Navier-Stokes Equations with Transport and Stretching Noise on Bounded Domains. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.13791 (2024) 35

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  3. [50]

    On the local well-posedness of fractionally dissipated primitive equations with transport noise

    Hu, R., Lin, Q., Liu, R.: On the local well-posedness of fractionally dissipated primitive equations with transport noise. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.09956 (2025)

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  4. [39]

    Journal of Differential Equations 429, 1–49 (2025)

    Goodair, D.: Navier-Stokes equations with Navier boundary conditions and stochastic lie transport: well-posedness and inviscid limit. Journal of Differential Equations 429, 1–49 (2025)

    work page 2025

  5. [41]

    The Zero Viscosity Limit of Stochastic Navier-Stokes Flows

    Goodair, D., Crisan, D.: The Zero Viscosity Limit of Stochastic Navier-Stokes Flows. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.18836 (2023)

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

  6. [1]

    Stochastics and Partial Differential Equations: Analysis and Computations 12(3), 1907–1981 (2024)

    Agresti, A.: Delayed blow-up and enhanced diffusion by transport noise for systems of reaction– diffusion equations. Stochastics and Partial Differential Equations: Analysis and Computations 12(3), 1907–1981 (2024)

    work page 2024

  7. [2]

    Global smooth solutions by transport noise of 3D Navier-Stokes equations with small hyperviscosity

    Agresti, A.: Global smooth solutions by transport noise of 3D Navier-Stokes equations with small hyperviscosity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.09267 (2024)

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  8. [3]

    Probability Theory and Related Fields 188(3), 957–1015 (2024) 33

    Agresti, A., Veraar, M.: The critical variational setting for stochastic evolution equations. Probability Theory and Related Fields 188(3), 957–1015 (2024) 33

    work page 2024

Show all 63 references
  1. [4]

    Communications in Mathematical Physics 405(2), 43 (2024)

    Agresti, A., Veraar, M.: Stochastic Navier–Stokes equations for turbulent flows in critical spaces. Communications in Mathematical Physics 405(2), 43 (2024)

    2024

  2. [5]

    Journal of Nonlinear Science 31(6), 98 (2021)

    Alonso-Or´ an, D., Rohde, C., Tang, H.: A local-in-time theory for singular SDEs with appli- cations to fluid models with transport noise. Journal of Nonlinear Science 31(6), 98 (2021)

    2021

  3. [6]

    Beale, J.T., Kato, T., Majda, A.: Remarks on the breakdown of smooth solutions for the 3-D Euler equations. Comm. Math. Phys. 94(1), 61–66 (1984). URL http://projecteuclid. org.univaq.clas.cineca.it/euclid.cmp/1103941230

    1984

  4. [7]

    Stochastic Analysis and Applications 10(5), 523–532 (1992)

    Brze´ zniak, Z., Capi´ nski, M., Flandoli, F.: Stochastic Navier-Stokes equations with multiplica- tive noise. Stochastic Analysis and Applications 10(5), 523–532 (1992)

    1992

  5. [8]

    Journal of Differential Equations 296, 617–676 (2021)

    Brze´ zniak, Z., Slavik, J.: Well-posedness of the 3D stochastic primitive equations with multi- plicative and transport noise. Journal of Differential Equations 296, 617–676 (2021)

    2021

  6. [9]

    Springer Nature (2024)

    Chapron, B., Crisan, D., Holm, D., M´ emin, E., Radomska, A.: Stochastic Transport in Upper Ocean Dynamics II: STUOD 2022 Workshop, London, UK, September 26–29. Springer Nature (2024)

    2024

  7. [10]

    Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 144(710), 251–260 (2018)

    Chapron, B., D´ erian, P., M´ emin, E., Resseguier, V.: Large-scale flows under location un- certainty: a consistent stochastic framework. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 144(710), 251–260 (2018)

    2018

  8. [11]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.03216 (2023)

    Coghi, M., Maurelli, M.: Existence and uniqueness by Kraichnan noise for 2D Euler equations with unbounded vorticity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.03216 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  9. [12]

    Journal of Statistical Physics 179(5), 1186–1221 (2020)

    Cotter, C., Crisan, D., Holm, D., Pan, W., Shevchenko, I.: Data assimilation for a quasi- geostrophic model with circulation-preserving stochastic transport noise. Journal of Statistical Physics 179(5), 1186–1221 (2020)

    2020

  10. [13]

    Multiscale Modeling & Simulation 17(1), 192–232 (2019)

    Cotter, C., Crisan, D., Holm, D.D., Pan, W., Shevchenko, I.: Numerically modeling stochastic Lie transport in fluid dynamics. Multiscale Modeling & Simulation 17(1), 192–232 (2019)

    2019

  11. [14]

    Journal of Nonlinear Science 29(3), 813–870 (2019)

    Crisan, D., Flandoli, F., Holm, D.D.: Solution properties of a 3D stochastic Euler fluid equa- tion. Journal of Nonlinear Science 29(3), 813–870 (2019)

    2019

  12. [15]

    Nonlinearity 36(9), 4862 (2023)

    Crisan, D., Holm, D., Korn, P.: An implementation of Hasselmann’s paradigm for stochastic climate modelling based on stochastic Lie transport. Nonlinearity 36(9), 4862 (2023)

    2023

  13. [16]

    Stochastics and Dynamics 23(05), 2350,039 (2023)

    Crisan, D., Holm, D.D., Lang, O., Mensah, P.R., Pan, W.: Theoretical analysis and numerical approximation for the stochastic thermal quasi-geostrophic model. Stochastics and Dynamics 23(05), 2350,039 (2023)

    2023

  14. [18]

    Advances in Mathematics 404, 108,409 (2022)

    Crisan, D., Holm, D.D., Leahy, J.M., Nilssen, T.: Variational principles for fluid dynamics on rough paths. Advances in Mathematics 404, 108,409 (2022)

    2022

  15. [19]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14862v1 (2022) 34

    Crisan, D., Mensah, P.R.: Spatial analyticity and exponential decay of Fourier modes for the stochastic Navier-Stokes equation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14862v1 (2022) 34

    2022 arXiv

  16. [20]

    Da Prato, G., Zabczyk, J.: Stochastic equations in infinite dimensions, vol. 152. Cambridge university press (2014)

    2014

  17. [21]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.12654 (2024)

    Debussche, A., M´ emin, E.: Variational principles for fully coupled stochastic fluid dynamics across scales. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.12654 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  18. [22]

    Journal of the European Mathematical Society (2024)

    Debussche, A., Pappalettera, U.: Second order perturbation theory of two-scale systems in fluid dynamics. Journal of the European Mathematical Society (2024)

    2024

  19. [23]

    Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 148(744), 1075–1091 (2022)

    Duf´ ee, B., M´ emin, E., Crisan, D.: Stochastic parametrization: an alternative to inflation in Ensemble Kalman filters. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 148(744), 1075–1091 (2022)

    2022

  20. [24]

    Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems 15(1), e2022MS003,268 (2023)

    Ephrati, S.R., Cifani, P., Luesink, E., Geurts, B.J.: Data-Driven Stochastic Lie Transport Modeling of the 2D Euler Equations. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems 15(1), e2022MS003,268 (2023)

    2023

  21. [25]

    Communications in Partial Differential Equations 46(9), 1757–1788 (2021)

    Flandoli, F., Galeati, L., Luo, D.: Delayed blow-up by transport noise. Communications in Partial Differential Equations 46(9), 1757–1788 (2021)

    2021

  22. [26]

    Inventiones mathematicae 180(1), 1–53 (2010)

    Flandoli, F., Gubinelli, M., Priola, E.: Well-posedness of the transport equation by stochastic perturbation. Inventiones mathematicae 180(1), 1–53 (2010)

    2010

  23. [27]

    Probability Theory and Related Fields 180(1), 309–363 (2021)

    Flandoli, F., Luo, D.: High mode transport noise improves vorticity blow-up control in 3D Navier–Stokes equations. Probability Theory and Related Fields 180(1), 309–363 (2021)

    2021

  24. [28]

    Flandoli, F., Luongo, E., et al.: Stochastic partial differential equations in fluid mechanics, vol. 2330. Springer (2023)

    2023

  25. [29]

    Journal of Nonlinear Science 31(1), 1–38 (2021)

    Flandoli, F., Pappalettera, U.: 2D Euler equations with Stratonovich transport noise as a large-scale stochastic model reduction. Journal of Nonlinear Science 31(1), 1–38 (2021)

    2021

  26. [30]

    Stochas- tics and Partial Differential Equations: Analysis and Computations pp

    Flandoli, F., Pappalettera, U.: From additive to transport noise in 2D fluid dynamics. Stochas- tics and Partial Differential Equations: Analysis and Computations pp. 1–41 (2022)

    2022

  27. [31]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.08761 (2023)

    Galeati, L., Luo, D.: Weak well-posedness by transport noise for a class of 2D fluid dynamics equations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.08761 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  28. [32]

    Applicable Analysis 90(1), 85–102 (2011)

    Glatt-Holtz, N., Temam, R.: Cauchy convergence schemes for some nonlinear partial differen- tial equations. Applicable Analysis 90(1), 85–102 (2011)

    2011

  29. [33]

    Advances in Differential Equations 14(5/6), 567–600 (2009)

    Glatt-Holtz, N., Ziane, M., et al.: Strong pathwise solutions of the stochastic Navier-Stokes system. Advances in Differential Equations 14(5/6), 567–600 (2009)

    2009

  30. [34]

    Glatt-Holtz, N.E., Vicol, V.C.: Local and global existence of smooth solutions for the stochastic Euler equations with multiplicative noise. Ann. Probab. 42(1), 80–145 (2014). DOI 10.1214/ 12-AOP773. URL https://doi-org.univaq.clas.cineca.it/10.1214/12-AOP773

    2014 doi

  31. [35]

    DOI https://doi.org/10.25560/115126

    Goodair, D.: Navier-Stokes equations with stochastic Lie transport: well-posedness and in- viscid limit. DOI https://doi.org/10.25560/115126. URL http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/ 115126

    doi

  32. [37]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.11678 (2024)

    Goodair, D.: Improved Blow-Up Criterion in a Variational Framework for Nonlinear SPDEs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.11678 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  33. [38]

    Nonlinear Differential Equations and Applications NoDEA 31(6), 106 (2024)

    Goodair, D.: Weak and strong solutions to nonlinear SPDEs with unbounded noise. Nonlinear Differential Equations and Applications NoDEA 31(6), 106 (2024)

    2024

  34. [40]

    in: Stochastic Transport in Upper Ocean Dynamics Annual Workshop, pp

    Goodair, D., Crisan, D.: On the 3d navier-stokes equations with stochastic lie transport. in: Stochastic Transport in Upper Ocean Dynamics Annual Workshop, pp. 53–110. Springer Nature Switzerland Cham (2022)

    2022

  35. [42]

    Springer Nature (2024)

    Goodair, D., Crisan, D.: Stochastic Calculus in Infinite Dimensions and SPDEs. Springer Nature (2024)

    2024

  36. [43]

    Stochastics and Partial Differential Equations: Analysis and Computations pp

    Goodair, D., Crisan, D., Lang, O.: Existence and uniqueness of maximal solutions to SPDEs with applications to viscous fluid equations. Stochastics and Partial Differential Equations: Analysis and Computations pp. 1–64 (2023)

    2023

  37. [44]

    Stochastics: An International Journal of Probability and Stochastic Processes 26(3), 129–164 (1989)

    Gy¨ ongy, I.: On the approximation of stochastic partial differential equations ii. Stochastics: An International Journal of Probability and Stochastic Processes 26(3), 129–164 (1989)

    1989

  38. [45]

    The Annals of Probability 31(2), 564–591 (2003)

    Gy¨ ongy, I., Krylov, N.: On the splitting-up method and stochastic partial differential equa- tions. The Annals of Probability 31(2), 564–591 (2003)

    2003

  39. [46]

    Gy¨ ongy, I., Krylov, N.v.: Stochastic partial differential equations with unbounded coefficients and applications. III. Stochastics: An International Journal of Probability and Stochastic Processes 40(1-2), 77–115 (1992)

    1992

  40. [47]

    Probability Theory and Related Fields 188(3), 1183–1255 (2024)

    Hofmanov´ a, M., Lange, T., Pappalettera, U.: Global existence and non-uniqueness of 3D Euler equations perturbed by transport noise. Probability Theory and Related Fields 188(3), 1183–1255 (2024)

    2024

  41. [48]

    Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 471(2176), 20140,963 (2015)

    Holm, D.D.: Variational principles for stochastic fluid dynamics. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 471(2176), 20140,963 (2015)

    2015

  42. [49]

    Journal of Mathematical Physics 62(7), 073,102 (2021)

    Holm, D.D., Hu, R.: Stochastic effects of waves on currents in the ocean mixed layer. Journal of Mathematical Physics 62(7), 073,102 (2021)

    2021

  43. [51]

    The Physics of Fluids 11(5), 945–953 (1968)

    Kraichnan, R.H.: Small-scale structure of a scalar field convected by turbulence. The Physics of Fluids 11(5), 945–953 (1968)

    1968

  44. [52]

    Stochastics and Partial Differential Equations: Analysis and Computations 11(2), 433–480 (2023) 36

    Lang, O., Crisan, D.: Well-posedness for a stochastic 2D Euler equation with transport noise. Stochastics and Partial Differential Equations: Analysis and Computations 11(2), 433–480 (2023) 36

    2023

  45. [53]

    Springer (2017)

    Lototsky, S.V., Rozovsky, B.L., et al.: Stochastic partial differential equations. Springer (2017)

    2017

  46. [54]

    Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics: A Journal Issued by the Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences 54(8), 891–974 (2001)

    Majda, A.J., Timofeyev, I., Vanden Eijnden, E.: A mathematical framework for stochastic climate models. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics: A Journal Issued by the Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences 54(8), 891–974 (2001)

    2001

  47. [55]

    Geophysical & Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics 108(2), 119–146 (2014)

    M´ emin, E.: Fluid flow dynamics under location uncertainty. Geophysical & Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics 108(2), 119–146 (2014)

    2014

  48. [56]

    in: Stochastics in Finite and Infinite Dimensions: In Honor of Gopinath Kallianpur, pp

    Mikulevicius, R., Rozovskii, B.: On equations of stochastic fluid mechanics. in: Stochastics in Finite and Infinite Dimensions: In Honor of Gopinath Kallianpur, pp. 285–302. Springer (2001)

    2001

  49. [57]

    SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 35(5), 1250–1310 (2004)

    Mikulevicius, R., Rozovskii, B.L.: Stochastic Navier–Stokes equations for turbulent flows. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 35(5), 1250–1310 (2004)

    2004

  50. [58]

    Pr´ evˆ ot, C., R¨ ockner, M.: A concise course on stochastic partial differential equations,Lecture Notes in Mathematics , vol. 1905. Springer, Berlin (2007)

    2007

  51. [59]

    Geophysical & Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics 111(3), 149–176 (2017)

    Resseguier, V., M´ emin, E., Chapron, B.: Geophysical flows under location uncertainty, Part I Random transport and general models. Geophysical & Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics 111(3), 149–176 (2017)

    2017

  52. [60]

    Robinson, J.C., Rodrigo, J.L., Sadowski, W.: The three-dimensional Navier–Stokes equations: Classical theory, vol. 157. Cambridge university press (2016)

    2016

  53. [61]

    Proceedings of the Royal Society A 477(2247), 20200,957 (2021)

    Street, O.D., Crisan, D.: Semi-martingale driven variational principles. Proceedings of the Royal Society A 477(2247), 20200,957 (2021)

    2021

  54. [62]

    Journal of Functional Analysis p

    Tang, H.: On stochastic Euler-Poincar´ e equations driven by pseudo-differential/multiplicative noise. Journal of Functional Analysis p. 110075 (2023)

    2023

  55. [63]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.08312 (2022) 37

    Tang, H., Wang, F.Y.: A general framework for solving singular SPDEs with applications to fluid models driven by pseudo-differential noise. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.08312 (2022) 37

    2022 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.