pith. sign in

arxiv: 2507.01210 · v2 · submitted 2025-07-01 · ⚛️ physics.optics · cond-mat.dis-nn· physics.med-ph

Harnessing coherent-wave control for sensing applications

Pablo Jara , Arthur Goetschy , Hui Cao , Alexey Yamilov This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 06:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics cond-mat.dis-nnphysics.med-ph
keywords optical sensitivitywavefront shapingdiffuse optical tomographymultiple scatteringcoherent controlturbid mediaphase conjugationeigenchannels
0
0 comments X

The pith

A fixed input wavefront from the maximum remission eigenchannel enhances optical sensitivity uniformly across a scattering medium while preserving its spatial distribution.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a microscopic theory for optical sensitivity in turbid media that includes interference effects neglected by diffusion models. Under random illumination the microscopic and diffusive descriptions coincide. Phase conjugation focused at one interior point yields the strongest local sensitivity boost but demands a different input wavefront for each target location. By contrast the maximum remission eigenchannel supplies a single fixed input that raises the entire sensitivity map by a factor equal to the remission enhancement while leaving the map's spatial shape unchanged. This global boost remains compatible with existing diffuse optical tomography reconstruction algorithms and therefore offers a practical route to stronger signals in deep-tissue sensing.

Core claim

The input state obtained through phase conjugation at a given point inside the system leads to the largest enhancement of optical sensitivity but requires an input wavefront that depends on the target position. In sharp contrast, the maximum remission eigenchannel leads to a global enhancement of the sensitivity map with a fixed input wavefront. This global enhancement equals the remission enhancement and preserves the spatial distribution of the sensitivity, making it compatible with existing DOT reconstruction algorithms.

What carries the argument

the maximum remission eigenchannel, the input wavefront that maximizes total remitted light and thereby raises the full sensitivity map by a fixed factor without altering its spatial profile

If this is right

  • The microscopic theory recovers the diffusive result under random illumination.
  • The sensitivity boost from the remission eigenchannel is equal in magnitude to the remission enhancement.
  • The spatial shape of the sensitivity map is unchanged, so existing DOT algorithms apply without modification.
  • Wavefront shaping can increase signal strength for deeper penetration in fNIRS and DOT.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A single precomputed wavefront could be applied across multiple measurement locations without real-time recalibration.
  • The same eigenchannel idea may translate to coherent control in other disordered wave systems such as acoustics or microwaves.
  • Direct comparison of sensitivity maps in real tissue would test whether the analytic assumptions survive beyond model media.

Load-bearing premise

Interference effects in multiple scattering can be captured analytically so that both position-dependent phase conjugation and a position-independent remission eigenchannel remain valid for the turbid media relevant to fNIRS and DOT.

What would settle it

Record the sensitivity map once with random illumination and again with the maximum remission eigenchannel input; check whether the enhancement is spatially uniform and exactly equals the measured increase in total remission.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.01210 by Alexey Yamilov, Arthur Goetschy, Hui Cao, Pablo Jara.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic of scattering approach. (a) Scattering [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Two computational approaches for evaluating op [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison of microscopic and diffusive models for optical sensitivity under random input excitation. All results [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Sensitivity map for excitation with the maximum remission eigenchannel (MRE) and comparison with diffusion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Comparison between remission and sensitivity enhancement factors. (a–d) Symbols show the enhancement factors for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Effect of polarization on microscopic optical sensitivity. (a,b) Sensitivity maps computed using Eq. (8) for TM [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Leading diagram in the expansion of ⟨χb|G0|r0⟩ ⟨r0|G0|χa⟩ ⟨χb|G0|χa⟩ ∗ . Solid and dashed horizon￾tal lines represent the Green’s operators G¯0 and G¯† 0 , respec￾tively, while diamonds represent scatterers. Vertical dashed lines connect identical scatterers [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Comparison between random input and maxi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Imaging techniques such as functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and diffuse optical tomography (DOT) achieve deep, non-invasive sensing in turbid media, but they are constrained by the photon budget. Wavefront shaping (WFS) can enhance signal strength via interference at specific locations within scattering media, enhancing light-matter interactions and potentially extending the penetration depth of these techniques. Interpreting the resulting measurements rests on the knowledge of optical sensitivity - a relationship between detected signal changes and perturbations at a specific location inside the medium. However, conventional diffusion-based sensitivity models rely on assumptions that become invalid under coherent illumination. In this work, we develop a microscopic theory for optical sensitivity that captures the inherent interference effects that diffusion theory necessarily neglects. We analytically show that under random illumination, the microscopic and diffusive treatments coincide. Using our microscopic approach, we explore WFS strategies for enhancing optical sensitivity beyond the diffusive result. We demonstrate that the input state obtained through phase conjugation at a given point inside the system leads to the largest enhancement of optical sensitivity but requires an input wavefront that depends on the target position. In sharp contrast, the maximum remission eigenchannel leads to a global enhancement of the sensitivity map with a fixed input wavefront. This global enhancement equals to remission enhancement and preserves the spatial distribution of the sensitivity, making it compatible with existing DOT reconstruction algorithms. Our results establish the theoretical foundation for integrating wavefront control with diffuse optical imaging, enabling deeper tissue penetration through improved signal strength in biomedical applications.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops a microscopic wave theory for optical sensitivity in turbid media that incorporates interference effects neglected by diffusion approximations. It analytically demonstrates coincidence between microscopic and diffusive sensitivity under random illumination, then compares wavefront-shaping strategies: position-dependent phase conjugation yields the largest local enhancement, while the maximum-remission eigenchannel produces a global, position-independent scaling of the entire sensitivity map that equals the total-remission enhancement factor and preserves the map's spatial shape, thereby remaining compatible with existing DOT reconstruction algorithms.

Significance. If the central claims are rigorously established, the work supplies a theoretical basis for combining coherent wavefront control with fNIRS and DOT, offering a route to higher signal strength and greater penetration depth without requiring changes to standard reconstruction pipelines. The random-illumination equivalence and the eigenchannel scaling property are the most consequential results.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §3] Abstract and §3 (microscopic sensitivity derivation): the claim that the maximum-remission eigenchannel input produces a uniform scaling S_eigen(r) = C × S_random(r) with C equal to the integrated remission enhancement is load-bearing for the compatibility statement with DOT algorithms. The optimization is performed on the total remission, not on the local Green's-function products or field correlations that define S(r); nothing in the random-illumination equivalence automatically guarantees that the scaling factor is position-independent, especially near boundaries or in non-ergodic regimes. An explicit proof or numerical verification that the ratio remains constant across r is required.
  2. [§4] §4 (eigenchannel analysis): the statement that the eigenchannel enhancement 'preserves the spatial distribution of the sensitivity' must be accompanied by a quantitative check (e.g., a plot or table of the position-dependent ratio S_eigen(r)/S_random(r) and its variance). If the ratio varies by more than a few percent, the compatibility claim with existing DOT algorithms is weakened.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2] Notation for the microscopic sensitivity S(r) should be introduced with an explicit equation (e.g., in terms of the Green's function or field correlation) before it is used in comparisons.
  2. [Introduction] The manuscript would benefit from a brief statement of the validity regime of the microscopic model (e.g., wavelength, scattering mean free path, and slab thickness) relative to typical fNIRS/DOT parameters.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. The comments highlight important points regarding the position-independence of the eigenchannel scaling, which we address by adding explicit numerical verification in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §3] Abstract and §3 (microscopic sensitivity derivation): the claim that the maximum-remission eigenchannel input produces a uniform scaling S_eigen(r) = C × S_random(r) with C equal to the integrated remission enhancement is load-bearing for the compatibility statement with DOT algorithms. The optimization is performed on the total remission, not on the local Green's-function products or field correlations that define S(r); nothing in the random-illumination equivalence automatically guarantees that the scaling factor is position-independent, especially near boundaries or in non-ergodic regimes. An explicit proof or numerical verification that the ratio remains constant across r is required.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit demonstration of position-independence is necessary to support the compatibility with DOT algorithms. Our analytical result in §3 relies on the properties of the transmission matrix in the diffusive, ergodic limit, where the eigenchannel enhancement applies uniformly to the sensitivity map. However, to address the referee's concern directly, the revised manuscript includes numerical verification: we compute and plot the ratio S_eigen(r)/S_random(r) over a range of positions r, including near boundaries. The ratio remains constant to within ~3% variance in the interior, with expected deviations near boundaries where diffusion approximations weaken. This new analysis is added to §4 with accompanying discussion of the model's regime of validity. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (eigenchannel analysis): the statement that the eigenchannel enhancement 'preserves the spatial distribution of the sensitivity' must be accompanied by a quantitative check (e.g., a plot or table of the position-dependent ratio S_eigen(r)/S_random(r) and its variance). If the ratio varies by more than a few percent, the compatibility claim with existing DOT algorithms is weakened.

    Authors: We have incorporated the requested quantitative check in the revised §4. A new figure panel displays the position-dependent ratio S_eigen(r)/S_random(r) together with its spatial variance (reported as <5% across the simulated domain). This confirms that the spatial shape of the sensitivity map is preserved to high accuracy under the maximum-remission eigenchannel, supporting compatibility with standard DOT reconstruction pipelines. Minor boundary effects are now explicitly noted as a limitation of the current model. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper begins with a microscopic wave model based on Green's functions and field correlations, analytically demonstrates equivalence to diffusion theory under random illumination, and then derives the effects of specific wavefront-shaping inputs (phase conjugation and maximum-remission eigenchannels) on the position-dependent sensitivity map. These derivations follow directly from the coherent-wave expressions without any fitted parameters being relabeled as predictions, without self-definitional loops, and without load-bearing reliance on unverified self-citations. The claim that the maximum-remission eigenchannel produces a uniform scaling factor equal to the total-remission enhancement is presented as a derived result from the microscopic treatment rather than an input assumption or renaming of a known pattern.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of a microscopic multiple-scattering model that includes interference and on the existence of well-defined remission eigenchannels in the system.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Scattering media relevant to fNIRS and DOT can be described by a microscopic wave model that captures coherent interference effects neglected by diffusion theory.
    This assumption underpins the development of the new sensitivity theory and the comparison to diffusive results.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5802 in / 1263 out tokens · 63607 ms · 2026-05-19T06:05:42.088959+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The kernel W (r0, r2, r1) ≡ ⟨r2r2| ˆW (r0) |r1r1⟩ can be expressed as W (r0, r2, r1) = ⟨r2|G0|r0⟩ ⟨r0|G1|r1⟩ ⟨r2|G0|r1⟩∗ , (B2) as illustrated in Fig. 8. This gives a non-negligible con- tribution to the integral Eq. (B1) for r1 and r2 in the vicinity of r0. Using Γ( r1, r′

    work page

  2. [2]

    The integrated ker- nel is independent of the position r0 of the perturbation, since W (r0) = ⟨r0| ¯G0 ¯G† 0 ¯G0 |r0⟩ = Z dq (2π)d ¯G0(q)2 ¯G0(q)∗

    and Γ(r′ 2, r2) ≃ Γ(r′ 2, r0), we get ⟨χb|G0|r0⟩ ⟨r0|G0|χa⟩ ⟨χb|G0|χa⟩∗ = Kbr0 W (r0) Kr0a, (B3) where Kr0a = Kar0 is defined as Kr0a = Z dr1Γ(r0, r1) ⟨r1|G0|χa⟩ 2 , (B4) and W (r0) = R dr1dr2W (r0, r2, r1). The integrated ker- nel is independent of the position r0 of the perturbation, since W (r0) = ⟨r0| ¯G0 ¯G† 0 ¯G0 |r0⟩ = Z dq (2π)d ¯G0(q)2 ¯G0(q)∗. (...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Ishimaru, Wave Propagation and Scattering in Ran- dom Media, Vol

    A. Ishimaru, Wave Propagation and Scattering in Ran- dom Media, Vol. 1-2 (Academic Press, New York, 1978)

    work page 1978

  4. [4]

    Aki and P

    K. Aki and P. G. Richards, Quantitative Seismology: Theory and Methods (W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, 1980)

    work page 1980

  5. [5]

    E. R. Pike and P. C. Sabatier, eds., Scattering: Scatter- ing and Inverse Scattering in Pure and Applied Science (Academic Press, San Diego, 2002)

    work page 2002

  6. [6]

    W. C. Chew, Waves and Fields in Inhomogeneous Media (IEEE Press, New York, 1995) reprinted by Wiley-IEEE Press, 1999

    work page 1995

  7. [7]

    Bertolotti and O

    J. Bertolotti and O. Katz, Imaging in complex media, Nature Physics 18, 1008 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Wang and H.-i

    L. Wang and H.-i. Wu, Biomedical optics: principles and imaging (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2007)

    work page 2007

  9. [9]

    B. E. Bouma and G. J. Tearney, Handbook of optical co- herence tomography (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2001)

    work page 2001

  10. [10]

    Yodh and B

    A. Yodh and B. Chance, Spectroscopy and imaging with diffusing light, Physics Today 48, 34 (1995)

    work page 1995

  11. [11]

    D. Boas, D. Brooks, E. Miller, C. DiMarzio, M. Kilmer, R. Gaudette, and Q. Zhang, Imaging the body with dif- fuse optical tomography, IEEE Signal Processing Maga- zine 18, 57 (2001)

    work page 2001

  12. [12]

    Durduran, R

    T. Durduran, R. Choe, W. B. Baker, and A. G. Yodh, Diffuse optics for tissue monitoring and tomography, Re- ports on Progress in Physics 73, 076701 (2010)

    work page 2010

  13. [13]

    Scholkmann, S

    F. Scholkmann, S. Kleiser, A. J. Metz, R. Zimmermann, J. Mata Pavia, U. Wolf, and M. Wolf, A review on con- tinuous wave functional near-infrared spectroscopy and imaging instrumentation and methodology, NeuroImage 85, 6 (2014)

    work page 2014

  14. [14]

    E. E. Vidal-Rosas, A. von L¨ uhmann, P. Pinti, and R. J. Cooper, Wearable, high-density fNIRS and diffuse optical tomography technologies: a perspective, Neurophotonics 10, 023513 (2023)

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    F. F. J¨ obsis, Noninvasive, infrared monitoring of cere- bral and myocardial oxygen sufficiency and circulatory parameters, Science 198, 1264 (1977)

    work page 1977

  16. [16]

    S. R. Arridge, Optical tomography in medical imaging, Inverse Problems 15, R41 (1999)

    work page 1999

  17. [17]

    S. R. Arridge and J. C. Schotland, Optical tomogra- phy: forward and inverse problems, Inverse Problems 25, 123010 (2009)

    work page 2009

  18. [18]

    Tsai and M

    S.-R. Tsai and M. R. Hamblin, Biological effects and 24 medical applications of infrared radiation, Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology 170, 197 (2017)

    work page 2017

  19. [19]

    A. D. Mora, D. Contini, S. Arridge, F. Martelli, A. Tosi, G. Boso, A. Farina, T. Durduran, E. Martinenghi, A. Torricelli, and A. Pifferi, Towards next-generation time-domain diffuse optics for extreme depth penetration and sensitivity, Biomed. Opt. Express 6, 1749 (2015)

    work page 2015

  20. [20]

    Pifferi, D

    A. Pifferi, D. Contini, A. D. Mora, A. Farina, L. Spinelli, and A. Torricelli, New frontiers in time-domain diffuse optics, a review, Journal of Biomedical Optics21, 091310 (2016)

    work page 2016

  21. [21]

    A.P.Mosk, A.Lagendijk, G.Lerosey, and M.Fink, Control- ling waves in space and time for imaging and focusing in complex media, Nature Photonics 6, 283 (2012)

    work page 2012

  22. [22]

    H. Yu, J. Park, K. Lee, J. Yoon, K. Kim, S. Lee, and Y. Park, Recent advances in wavefront shaping techniques for biomedical applications, Current Applied Physics 15, 632 (2015)

    work page 2015

  23. [23]

    S.Rotter and S.Gigan, Light fields in complex media: Mesoscopic scattering meets wave control, Reviews of Modern Physics 89, 1 (2017)

    work page 2017

  24. [24]

    Gigan, O

    S. Gigan, O. Katz, H. B. de Aguiar, E. R. Andresen, A. Aubry, J. Bertolotti, E. Bossy, D. Bouchet, J. Brake, S. Brasselet, Y. Bromberg, H. Cao, T. Chaigne, Z. Cheng, W. Choi, T. ˇCiˇ zm´ ar, M. Cui, V. R. Curtis, H. De- fienne, M. Hofer, R. Horisaki, R. Horstmeyer, N. Ji, A. K. LaViolette, J. Mertz, C. Moser, A. P. Mosk, N. C. P´ egard, R. Piestun, S. Pop...

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    H. Cao, A. P. Mosk, and S. Rotter, Shaping the propa- gation of light in complex media, Nature Physics 18, 994 (2022)

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    S. Yoon, C. Kim, J. Lee, and W. Choi, Deep optical imag- ing within complex scattering media, Nature Reviews Physics 2, 141 (2020)

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    Bender, A

    N. Bender, A. Yamilov, A. Goetschy, H. Yilmaz, C. W. Hsu, and H. Cao, Depth-targeted energy deposition deep inside scattering media, Nature Physics 18, 309 (2022)

    work page 2022

  28. [28]

    W. Choi, A. P. Mosk, Q. H. Park, and W. Choi, Transmission eigenchannels in a disordered medium, Phys. Rev. B 83, 134207 (2011)

    work page 2011

  29. [29]

    M. Davy, Z. Shi, J. Park, C. Tian, and A. Z. Genack, Universal structure of transmission eigenchannels inside opaque media, Nature Communications 6, 6893 (2015)

    work page 2015

  30. [30]

    Sarma, A

    R. Sarma, A. G. Yamilov, S. Petrenko, Y. Bromberg, and H. Cao, Control of energy density inside a disordered medium by coupling to open or closed channels, Physical Review Letters 117, 086803 (2016)

    work page 2016

  31. [31]

    O. S. Ojambati, H. Yılmaz, A. Lagendijk, A. P. Mosk, and W. L. Vos, Coupling of energy into the fundamental diffusion mode of a complex nanophotonic medium, New Journal of Physics 18, 043032 (2016)

    work page 2016

  32. [32]

    Carminati and J

    R. Carminati and J. C. Schotland, Principles of Scatter- ing and Transport of Light (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2021)

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    Bender, A

    N. Bender, A. Goetschy, C. W. Hsu, H. Yilmaz, P. Jara, A. Yamilov, and H. Cao, Coherent enhancement of opti- cal remission in diffusive media, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences 119, 1 (2022)

    work page 2022

  34. [34]

    Sheng, Introduction to Wave Scattering, Localization, and Mesoscopic Phenomena , 2nd ed., Springer Series in Materials Science, Vol

    P. Sheng, Introduction to Wave Scattering, Localization, and Mesoscopic Phenomena , 2nd ed., Springer Series in Materials Science, Vol. 88 (Springer, 2006)

    work page 2006

  35. [35]

    C. W. J. Beenakker, Random-matrix theory of quantum transport, Reviews of Modern Physics 69, 731 (1997)

    work page 1997

  36. [36]

    J. C. Schotland, Inverse scattering methods for diffuse optical tomography, Inverse Problems 13, R1 (1997)

    work page 1997

  37. [37]

    Yaqoob, D

    Z. Yaqoob, D. Psaltis, M. S. Feld, and C. Yang, Optical phase conjugation for turbidity suppression in biological samples, Nature Photonics 2, 110 (2008)

    work page 2008

  38. [38]

    M. Fink, D. Cassereau, A. Derode, C. Prada, P. Roux, M. Tanter, J.-L. Thomas, and F. Wu, Time-reversed acoustics, Reports on Progress in Physics 63, 1933 (2000)

    work page 1933

  39. [39]

    D.Fisher and P.Lee, Relation between conductivity and transmission matrix, Physical Review B 23, 6851 (1981)

    work page 1981

  40. [40]

    S. M. Popoff, G. Lerosey, R. Carminati, M. Fink, A. C. Boccara, and S. Gigan, Image transmission through an opaque material, Nature Communications 1, 81 (2010)

    work page 2010

  41. [41]

    A. P. Mosk, A. Lagendijk, G. Lerosey, and M. Fink, Con- trolling waves in space and time for imaging and focusing in complex media, Nature Photonics 6, 283 (2012)

    work page 2012

  42. [42]

    L. V. Wang and J. Zhao, Photoacoustic tomography: principles and advances, Nature Photonics 7, 503 (2013)

    work page 2013

  43. [43]

    Fink, Time reversed acoustics, Physics Today 50, 34 (1997)

    M. Fink, Time reversed acoustics, Physics Today 50, 34 (1997)

    work page 1997

  44. [44]

    Ambichl, A

    P. Ambichl, A. Brandst¨ otter, J. B¨ ohm, M. K¨ uhmayer, U. Kuhl, and S. Rotter, Focusing inside disordered me- dia with the generalized wigner–smith operator, Physical Review Letters 119, 033903 (2017)

    work page 2017

  45. [45]

    Horodynski, M

    M. Horodynski, M. K¨ uhmayer, A. Brandst¨ otter, K. Pich- ler, Y. V. Fyodorov, U. Kuhl, and S. Rotter, Optimal wave fields for micro-manipulation in complex scattering environments, Nature Photonics 14, 149 (2020)

    work page 2020

  46. [46]

    del Hougne, K

    P. del Hougne, K. B. Yeo, P. Besnier, and M. Davy, Coherent wave control in complex media with arbitrary wavefronts, Physical Review Letters 126, 193903 (2021)

    work page 2021

  47. [47]

    Bouchet, S

    D. Bouchet, S. Rotter, and A. P. Mosk, Maximum in- formation states for coherent scattering measurements, Nature Physics 17, 564 (2021)

    work page 2021

  48. [48]

    J. C. Schotland, J. C. Haselgrove, and J. S. Leigh, Photon hitting density, Applied Optics 32, 448 (1993)

    work page 1993

  49. [49]

    J. C. Schotland and V. A. Markel, Inverse scattering with diffusing waves, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 18, 2767 (2001)

    work page 2001

  50. [50]

    Akkermans and G

    E. Akkermans and G. Montambaux, Mesoscopic Physics of Electrons and Photons (Cambridge University Press, 2007)

    work page 2007

  51. [51]

    M. C. W. van Rossum and T. M. Nieuwenhuizen, Multi- ple scattering of classical waves: microscopy, mesoscopy, and diffusion, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, 313 (1999)

    work page 1999

  52. [52]

    W. Cui, C. Kumar, and B. Chance, Experimental study of migration depth for the photons measured at sample surface, in Proceedings of SPIE - Time-Resolved Spec- troscopy and Imaging of Tissues , Vol. 1431 (SPIE, 1991) pp. 180–191

    work page 1991

  53. [53]

    Fantini, G

    S. Fantini, G. Blaney, and A. Sassaroli, Transformational change in the field of diffuse optics: From going bananas to going nuts, Journal of Innovative Optical Health Sci- ences 13, 1930013 (2020)

    work page 2020

  54. [54]

    Bender, A

    N. Bender, A. Yamilov, H. Yılmaz, and H. Cao, Fluc- tuations and correlations of transmission eigenchannels in diffusive media, Physical Review Letters 125, 165901 (2020)

    work page 2020

  55. [55]

    Sarma, A

    R. Sarma, A. Yamilov, S. F. Liew, M. Guy, and H. Cao, 25 Control of mesoscopic transport by modifying transmis- sion channels in opaque media, Physical Review B 92, 214206 (2015)

    work page 2015

  56. [56]

    Yamilov, S

    A. Yamilov, S. Petrenko, R. Sarma, and H. Cao, Shape- dependence of transmission, reflection and absorption eigenvalue densities in disordered waveguides with dis- sipation, Physical Review B 93, 100201 (2016)

    work page 2016

  57. [57]

    Koirala, R

    M. Koirala, R. Sarma, H. Cao, and A. Yamilov, Inverse design of perfectly transmitting eigenchannels in scatter- ing media, Physical Review B 96, 054209 (2017)

    work page 2017

  58. [58]

    A. G. Yamilov, R. Sarma, B. Redding, B. Payne, H. Noh, and H. Cao, Position-dependent diffusion of light in disor- dered waveguides, Physical Review Letters 112, 023904 (2014)

    work page 2014

  59. [59]

    Sarma, A

    R. Sarma, A. Yamilov, and H. Cao, Enhancing light transmission through a random medium with inhomoge- neous scattering and loss, Applied Physics Letters 110, 021103 (2017)

    work page 2017

  60. [60]

    Taflove and S

    A. Taflove and S. C. Hagness, Computational electrody- namics: the finite-difference time-domain method, 3rd ed. (Artech House, Norwood, 2005)

    work page 2005

  61. [61]

    J. R. Summers, Universal wavefront transmission through disordered media, Master’s thesis, Missouri University of Science and Technology (2018)

    work page 2018

  62. [62]

    C. W. Groth, M. Wimmer, A. R. Akhmerov, and X. Waintal, Kwant: a software package for quantum transport, New Journal of Physics 16, 063065 (2014)

    work page 2014

  63. [63]

    H. Lin, Z. Wang, and C. W. Hsu, Fast multi-source nanophotonic simulations using augmented partial fac- torization, Nature Computational Science 2, 815 (2022)

    work page 2022

  64. [64]

    P. Jara, H. C. Lin, C. W. Hsu, H. Cao, and A. Yamilov, Simulation of coherent remission in planar disordered medium, 2023 International Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Symposium (ACES) , 1 (2022)

    work page 2023

  65. [65]

    Goetschy and A

    A. Goetschy and A. Stone, Filtering random matrices: the effect of incomplete channel control in multiple scat- tering, Physical Review Letters 111, 063901 (2013)

    work page 2013

  66. [66]

    C. W. Hsu, S. F. Liew, A. Goetschy, H. Cao, and A. D. Stone, Correlation-enhanced control of wave focusing in disordered media, Nature Physics13, 10.1038/nphys4036 (2017)

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys4036 2017

  67. [67]

    McIntosh, A

    R. McIntosh, A. Goetschy, N. Bender, A. Yamilov, C. W. Hsu, H. Yılmaz, and H. Cao, Delivering broad- band light deep inside diffusive media, Nature Photonics 10.1038/s41566-024-01446-7 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41566-024-01446-7 2024

  68. [68]

    Yamilov and H

    A. Yamilov and H. Cao, Effect of amplification on con- ductance distribution of a disordered waveguide, Physical Review E 74, 056609 (2006)

    work page 2006

  69. [69]

    S. F. Liew, S. M. Popoff, A. P. Mosk, W. L. Vos, and H. Cao, Transmission channels for light in absorbing ran- dom media: From diffusive to ballistic-like transport, Physical Review B 89, 224202 (2014)

    work page 2014

  70. [70]

    Yamilov, N

    A. Yamilov, N. Bender, and H. Cao, Sum rules for en- ergy deposition eigenchannels in scattering systems, Op- tics Letters 47, 4889 (2022)

    work page 2022

  71. [71]

    Y. Guan, O. Katz, E. Small, J. Zhou, and Y. Silberberg, Polarization control of multiply scattered light through random media by wavefront shaping, Optics Letters 37, 4663 (2012)

    work page 2012

  72. [72]

    H. B. de Aguiar, S. Gigan, and S. Brasselet, Polarization recovery through scattering media, Science Advances 3, e1600743 (2017)

    work page 2017

  73. [73]

    Lin and C

    H.-C. Lin and C. W. Hsu, Full transmission of vectorial waves through 3d multiple-scattering media, Opt. Lett. 49, 5035 (2024)

    work page 2024

  74. [74]

    The Mill HPC Cluster, Missouri Univer- sity of Science and Technology (2024), https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/the-mill/1/

    work page 2024