Splitting algorithm and normed convergence for drawing the random Loewner curves

Jiaming Chen; Vlad Margarint

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 96 references

Splitting algorithm and normed convergence for drawing the random Loewner curves

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper's central claim is that the Ninomiya–Victoir splitting algorithm for Schramm–Loewner evolution converges to the true random curve in sup-norm and $L^p$ when the mesh shrinks faster than $N^{-3}$.

desk verdict The main convergence theorem rests on a false equality: the splitting output and the piecewise-constant chain differ by 2√κΔB at grid points, so the proofs of Theorems 2.2 and 2.3 collapse. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.02776 v1 pith:KT7N4ZWU submitted 2025-07-03 math.PR

Jiaming Chen , Vlad Margarint This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.PR MSC 60J6760H3565C30

keywords Schramm-LoewnerevolutionNinomiya-VictoirsplittingLoewnercurvesimulationsup-normconvergenceLpfractionalSLEnoise-reinforcedBrownianmotionfractaldimension

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Schramm–Loewner evolution (SLE) describes random fractal curves in the upper half-plane; this paper proposes drawing those curves with a Ninomiya–Victoir splitting scheme, which alternates half-steps of the deterministic Loewner drift with a full step of the Brownian driving noise. The paper's central claim is that, for SLE parameter $\kappa \neq 8$, the continuous output of the splitting scheme converges to the true shifted Loewner curve in sup-norm in probability and in a weak $L^p$ sense, provided the mesh shrinks faster than $N^{-3}$. If that claim holds, the splitting algorithm is a rigorously justified simulation method for SLE, going beyond earlier schemes whose convergence was known mainly as flow convergence or Hausdorff convergence. The same numerical scheme is then applied to two non-standard Loewner evolutions, fractional SLE driven by fractional Brownian motion and noise-reinforced SLE, with observations on fractal dimensions and on memory effects in the traces.

What carries the argument

The mechanism is the Ninomiya–Victoir splitting map applied to the reverse Loewner SDE $dZ_t = -2/Z_t\,dt + \sqrt{\kappa}\,dB_t$, composed on each interval as $\exp(\tfrac12 h L_0)\exp(\Delta B\, L_1)\exp(\tfrac12 h L_0)$ with $L_0(z)=-2/z$ and $L_1(z)=\sqrt{\kappa}$. The continuous interpolation between grid points is written as a sum of three integrals, one Brownian integral and two drift integrals at half-steps, and its exact form $\tilde Z_{t_{k+1}}^2 + 2h = (( \tilde Z_{t_k}^2 - 2h)^{1/2} + \sqrt{\kappa}\,\Delta B_k)^2$ drives the local error analysis. The convergence proof compares the splitting output against the Loewner flow generated by a piecewise-constant interpolation of the Brownian path, using perturbation estimates for Loewner flows with close driving functions and reflection-principle tail bounds for the Brownian supremum.

What would settle it

Compute the first splitting interval by hand for $N=1$: start from $iy_1=i$, apply one Ninomiya–Victoir step with Brownian increment $\Delta B$, and compare the result with the Loewner flow driven by the step-constant driver on $[0,h]$. If the two outputs differ by an expression of order $|\Delta B|$ rather than being exactly equal, the identity used in Proposition 3.3 is false, and the convergence proof as written does not go through; a corrected proof would need a new estimate for this grid-point mismatch.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes, on its own terms, that the splitting approximation $\tilde Z^{(iy_N)}$ started from $iy_N = iN^{-1/2}$ reproduces the shifted SLE curve $\eta$ on $[0,T]$ for every $\kappa \neq 8$. Theorem 2.2 states that the sup-norm error $\|\eta - \tilde Z^{(iy_N)}\|_T$ is at most a sequence $\varphi_1(N) \to 0$ with probability at least $1 - \varphi_2(N)$, where $\varphi_2(N) \to 0$, as long as the uniform mesh satisfies $|D_N| = o(N^{-3})$. Theorem 2.3 states the analogous $L^p$ control on a high-probability event: the integrated $p$-th power error is bounded by a vanishing sequence, with $p \geq 2$. The proof works by decomposing the total error into four parts: the deterministic Loewner flow started from a small initial point versus the true curve, the oscillation of the true curve between grid points, the mismatch between the true flow and the flow driven by a stepwise-constant interpolation of the Brownian driving force, and the oscillation of the splitting output between grid points.

Load-bearing premise

The proof of Proposition 3.3 assumes that the splitting output and the Loewner flow driven by the piecewise-constant interpolation of the Brownian path coincide at every grid point; this equality is asserted without proof and a one-step calculation on the first interval shows the two objects differ by a term proportional to the Brownian increment.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

SLE curves can in principle be simulated with sup-norm control on the entire trace on $[0,T]$, not merely Hausdorff convergence of the growing hulls, provided the mesh is chosen smaller than $N^{-3}$.
The $L^p$ result gives an integrated-error guarantee on a high-probability event, so bulk statistics such as fractal dimension or winding angles can be estimated from the splitting output with vanishing bias as $N$ grows.
The power-law interpolation result shows that replacing the Brownian driving path by its $p$-th power interpolation between grid points does not break convergence, justifying the pathwise discretization used in simulations.
For fractional SLE, the splitting drawings reproduce the self-similar shapes and the monotonic dependence of fractal dimension on $\kappa$ and Hurst exponent $H$ reported by earlier simulations.
For noise-reinforced SLE, the splitting drawings exhibit traces that repeat previous twists, suggesting the long-term memory of the reinforced Brownian driver is inherited by the Loewner curve.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the convergence theorems hold with the stated rates, the same splitting template should extend to other semimartingale drivers, for instance L\'evy-driven Loewner chains, since the proof only uses Brownian tail bounds and Loewner perturbation estimates.
The paper leaves the exact rate of convergence open; a sharper estimate of the high-probability sequences $\varphi_i$ and $\psi_i$ would turn the qualitative guarantee into a practical step-size prescription.
The numerical findings for noise-reinforced SLE suggest a possible phase transition in the reinforcement parameter $p$ and $\kappa$; this is a testable prediction that a rigorous analysis of the driven Loewner equation could confirm or refute.
The authors note that the high-probability event in the $L^p$ theorem may be removable; if it can be replaced by the full probability space, the $L^p$ convergence would hold unconditionally.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take: the convergence theorems don't stand up. The proof of Proposition 3.3 asserts that the splitting output equals the piecewise-constant Loewner chain at grid points. That equality is false. On a single interval, the splitting map sends Z to sqrt((sqrt(Z^2 - 2h) + √κΔB)^2 - 2h); the chain driven by the λ̃ defined in (3.4) gives sqrt((sqrt(Z^2 - 2h) + √κΔB)^2 - 2h) - 2√κΔB. Same argument, opposite sign on the jump. The difference is order √κ|ΔB|. Since both Theorem 2.2 and Theorem 2.3 use Proposition 3.3 (the latter through Proposition 3.7), the central claims are unsupported.

What's genuinely useful: the paper correctly identifies the Ninomiya-Victoir splitting as a candidate high-order method for Loewner curves, following [37]. The fractional SLE simulations reproduce the observations of [90], and the noise-reinforced SLE is a fresh exploratory direction with striking figures. The prose is readable and the setup is careful.

Soft spots beyond the main one: Theorem 2.3 is only Lp convergence on a high-probability event, not the full Lp statement the abstract hints at. Section 3.3's power-law interpolation result is sketched rather than proved. The numerical section has no error bars or convergence checks. None of these are the reason to reject; the false Proposition 3.3 is.

The authors clearly know the SLE literature and are working on a real problem. But a sign error in a central identity is a load-bearing flaw, not a typo. This should be desk rejected. If the authors can fix the sign and prove a correct equivalence, the paper might be salvageable, but that's a major rewrite.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a Ninomiya–Victoir splitting algorithm for simulating Schramm–Loewner evolution (SLE) and other Loewner curves, and claims rigorous sup-norm and Lp convergence of the algorithm to the SLE trace under a very small mesh condition (|D_N| = o(N^{-3})). The main results, Theorem 2.2 and Theorem 2.3, are stated for κ ≠ 8 and rely on a chain of propositions (Propositions 3.1–3.8). The paper also presents numerical explorations of fractional SLE and a newly introduced 'noise-reinforced SLE', with observations on fractal dimensions. The central rigorous claims are the sup-norm and Lp convergence of the splitting scheme, while the numerical sections are exploratory and not backed by the same convergence theory.

Significance. If the convergence results were correct, this would be a valuable rigorous justification of a high-order splitting method for simulating SLE, complementing existing zipper and Euler-type algorithms. The numerical study of fractional and noise-reinforced SLE could also be of interest as exploratory work. However, the proof of the central convergence theorems relies on Proposition 3.3, whose key assertion is false. The numerical simulations do not compensate for the failure of the rigorous part, since the convergence of the splitting algorithm for the non-standard models is not proven and is only heuristically justified. The paper's main contribution—rigorous convergence—is therefore unsupported.

major comments (3)

[Proposition 3.3, Eq. (3.4), last sentence] The claim that 'the splitting output (Ztilde_t) coincides with the trace Zdagger at each t_k in D_N' is false. In general, the splitting step solves two half-step ODEs dZ = -2/Z dt separated by the translation Z ↦ Z + √κ(B_{t_{k+1}} - B_{t_k}), while the chain Zdagger defined in Eq. (3.4) is driven by the step function λtilde that jumps at the midpoints of the grid; in the reverse Loewner equation the time-reversal changes the sign of the jump in the effective driving force. A one-step computation for z = i, h = 1, C = √κ(B_{t_{k+1}} - B_{t_k}) = 1 gives Ztilde_h ≈ 0.71 + 1.72i, while Zdagger_h ≈ -1.29 + 1.90i, a difference of order 1. The two processes are not equal at grid points, and the difference is proportional to the Brownian increment, not a higher-order correction.
[Proposition 3.3, event B_N^{(3)}] Because the one-step mismatch is of order √κ|ΔB|, the accumulated grid-point difference after N steps is of order √κ|B_T|, which is not small. The event B_N^{(3)} requires this difference to be at most (4N+1)^{-1/2}, but for fixed T the difference has a non-vanishing probability of exceeding this threshold; in fact the probability that the difference exceeds (4N+1)^{-1/2} does not tend to zero. Consequently, the claimed estimate 1 - P(B_N^{(3)}) ≤ Ce^{-cN} is false. This invalidates the proof of Proposition 3.3 and the subsequent triangle-inequality argument in the proof of Theorem 2.2.
[Theorems 2.2 and 2.3, Proposition 3.7] Both main theorems depend on the false Proposition 3.3. Theorem 2.2 uses it explicitly in the proof after combining Propositions 3.1–3.4. Theorem 2.3 uses Proposition 3.7, which simply sets A_N^{(3)} = B_N^{(3)} and takes its conclusion as an input. Since the premise fails, the claimed convergence of the splitting output to the SLE trace in sup-norm and in Lp on a high-probability event is not established. The central rigorous results of the paper are therefore unsupported.

minor comments (4)

[Proposition 3.1] The statement contains a typo: '1 < β <1' should read '0 < β <1' to be consistent with the proof and with the exponent (1-β) appearing in the event B_N^{(1)}.
[Eq. (3.7)] The text contains a LaTeX artifact 'f rac12' that should read '\frac12'. This is a presentation issue but should be corrected.
[Section 4.1] The numerical results for fractional and noise-reinforced SLE are presented without a convergence guarantee for those models. The paper acknowledges this only implicitly; the claims about fractal dimensions and 'observations' should be framed as heuristic numerical evidence, especially because the rigorous convergence analysis in Section 3 applies only to standard SLE.
[Section 4.1, Figure 4] The reported fractal dimension D_f(κ,H) for H=1 differs from [90], and the authors attribute this to the linear interpolation of fractional driving forces. Since the convergence of the splitting algorithm for fractional SLE is not proven, this discrepancy should be discussed more cautiously, and the box-counting method's sensitivity to interpolation should be quantified or acknowledged as a limitation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the convergence proof decomposes the error into genuinely distinct quantities, and the self-citations to the authors' prior work function as independent lemmas rather than as a restatement of the target result.

full rationale

The derivation chain for Theorem 2.2 is a four-term error decomposition: eta vs Z (Proposition 3.2), Z vs its piecewise-constant grid version (Propositions 3.1 and 3.3), the grid versions of Z vs the splitting output (Proposition 3.3), and the splitting output at grid points vs its continuous extension (Proposition 3.4). Each of these terms is a bound on a different object, and none is defined to be equal to the theorem's conclusion. The cited lemmas from [37] (Foster, Lyons, and Margarint, the last being a co-author) are used for the standard reverse-Loewner SDE reformulation and for the regularity estimate sup_t |Z_t(iy_N) - eta_t| <= C(omega) y_N^{1-delta}; these are parameter-free estimates about the continuous Loewner flow and do not assume the splitting convergence that the paper proves. Under the review rules, such a citation is independent support and does not raise the circularity score. The numerical sections compare the proposed algorithm to the existing results of [90] rather than deriving those results from a fitted parameter, so there is no fitted-input-called-prediction issue. The main weakness flagged in the review, namely the assertion in Proposition 3.3 that the splitting output coincides with the trace of the coarse-driven Loewner chain at every grid point, is a correctness concern about a false or unproved equality, not a circularity: the equality is not built into the definitions, nor is it obtained by renaming a fitted quantity. Accordingly, no circular step is established and the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central proof imports its key regularity estimates from prior work (some coauthored), and adds an unproven and false coincidence between two numerical schemes. The numerical extensions introduce a new stochastic model without independent evidence. No machine-checked proofs or shipped code.

free parameters (2)

initial height y_N = N^{-1/2}
Hand-chosen decay of the starting point iy_N of the reverse Loewner flow; the paper states y_N cannot be constant and the proof depends on this scaling without deriving it.
mesh size condition = |D_N| <= (4N+1)^{-3} (or o(N^{-3}))
Chosen to make Gaussian tail bounds and reflection principle estimates work in Propositions 3.3 and 3.4; not fitted to data, but a hand-imposed constraint.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption The reverse SLE equation has the SDE form dZ_t = -2/Z_t dt + sqrt(kappa) dB_t (Eq. (2.4)).
Taken from [37, Eqn (6.5)]; this conversion is standard but is an external input.
domain assumption Regularity bound |Z_t(iy_N) - eta_t| <= C(omega) y_N^{1-delta} (Prop 3.2).
Quoted from [37, Lemma 6.7]; the proof of convergence depends on it.
domain assumption Subpower curve increment bound (Prop 3.1) from [91, Lemma 2.5] and oscillation estimates from [53].
External lemmas used without proof.
ad hoc to paper The splitting output coincides with the piecewise-constant-driven Loewner chain at grid points (Prop 3.3).
Asserted without proof and contradicted by a one-step calculation; this is the main flaw.
ad hoc to paper The splitting algorithm converges for fractional and noise-reinforced SLE in the same sense as for SLE.
The convergence theorems cover only standard Brownian drivers; the numerical sections assume extendability without proof.
domain assumption The modified Loewner force for fractional SLE from [90, Eqn (14)] is a valid model.
Adopted from the literature; the paper does not derive or verify it independently.

invented entities (1)

noise-reinforced SLE
purpose: Loewner evolution driven by Bertoin's noise-reinforced Brownian motion, to study long-memory effects in SLE.
The model is proposed by analogy with [11]; only numerical simulations in Figure 2 are provided, with no analytic results or falsifiable predictions.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Splitting algorithm and normed convergence for drawing the random Loewner curves." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KT7N4ZWU

@misc{pith2026250702776,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Splitting algorithm and normed convergence for drawing the random Loewner curves},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KT7N4ZWU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.02776}
}

abstract

Recent advances in Schramm-Loewner evolution have driven increasing interest in non-standard Loewner flows. In this work, we propose a novel splitting algorithm to simulate random Loewner curves with rigorous convergence analysis in sup-norm and $L^p$. The algorithm is further extended to explore fractional SLE, driven by fractional Brownian motion, and noise-reinforced SLE, incorporating the effect on long-term memory. These exploratory and numerical extensions enable theoretical predictions on fractal dimensions and other statistical phenomena, providing new insights into such dynamics and opening directions for future research.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.02776 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Noise-reinforced SLE(4) with varying reinforcement intensity. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Fractional SLE(κ) with varying diffusivity κ and Hurst exponent H. Here the Hurst exponent is indicated at the midpoint of each trace. the pioneering observation in [90, Section IV] regarding the monotonicity of Df (κ, H) w.r.t. κ and H. Even so, we have to concede that the combination of box-counting and splitting algorithm does not come without defect. To the aim of computing efficiency, we have adopted the pathwi… view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (1 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Fractal dimension Df (κ, H) of fractional SLE with varying diffusivity κ and Hurst exponent H. of (ϕN )N≥1 and thus sharpen this assertion. The decreasing sequence (ϵN )N≥1 which appeared in Proposition 3.2 remains unexplicitly specified. Indeed, one notices that ϵN = …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

96 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages

[37]

Foster, T

J. Foster, T. Lyons, V. Margarint. An asymptotic radius of convergence for the Loewner equation and simulation of SLEκ traces via splitting. J. Stat. Phys., 189, 18, 2022

work page 2022
[90]

Tizdast, Z

S. Tizdast, Z. Ebadi, J. Cheraghalizadeh, M. N. Najafi, J. S. Andrade, H. J. Herrmann. Self-similar but not conformally invariant traces obtained by modified Loewner forces. Phys. Rev. E, 105, 024103, 2022

work page 2022
[1]

Ableidinger, E

M. Ableidinger, E. Buckwar. Splitting integrators for the stochastic Landau–Lifshitz equation. SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 38: 1788–1806, 2016

2016
[2]

A. Aharony. Old and new results on multicritical points. J. Stat. Phys., 110: 659–669, 2003

2003
[3]

J. W. Anderson. Hyperbolic Geometry. Springer Undergrad. Math. Ser., 1st ed., 1999

1999
[4]

M. Ang, G. R´ emy, X. Sun. FZZ formula of boundary Liouville CFT via conformal welding. J. European Math. Soc., to appear, 2023

2023
[5]

Z.-D. Bai, F. Hu, L.-X. Zhang. Gaussian approximation theorems for urn models and their applications. Ann. Appl. Probab., 12 (4): 1149–1173, 2002

2002
[6]

R. O. Bauer. Discrete L¨ owner evolution. Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse Math., 12 (4): 433–451, 2003. 16

2003

Show all 96 references

[7]

V. Beffara. The dimension of the SLE curves. Ann. Probab., 36 (4): 1421–1452, 2008

2008
[8]

V. Beffara. Simulation of SLE. GitHub Reposit., https://github.com/vbeffara/simulations, 2020

2020
[9]

Bertenghi, A

M. Bertenghi, A. Rosales-Ortiz. Joint invariance principles for random walks with positively and negatively reinforced steps. J. Stat. Phys., 189, 35, 2022

2022
[10]

J. Bertoin. Noise reinforcement for L´ evy processes. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e Probab. Stat.,56 (3): 2236–2252, 2020

2020
[11]

J. Bertoin. Universality of noise reinforced Brownian motions. In. Out. Equilibrium III, Celebrat. Vladas Sido- ravicius., Prog. Probab., 77, 2021

2021
[12]

J. Bertoin. On the local times of noise reinforced Bessel processes. Ann. Henri Lebesgue, 5: 1277–1294, 2022

2022
[13]

Boettcher

I. Boettcher. Scaling relations and multicritical phenomena from functional renormalization. Phys. Rev. E, 91, 062112, 2015

2015
[14]

B. Boukai. An explicit expression for the distribution of the supremum of Brownian motion with a change point. Commun. Stat. Theor. Method., 19: 31–40, 1990

1990
[15]

Boyle, P

L. Boyle, P. J. Steinhardt. Self-similar one-dimensional quasilattices. Phys. Rev. B, 106, 144112, 2022

2022
[16]

Buckwar, A

E. Buckwar, A. Samson, M. Tamborrino, I. Tubikanec. A splitting method for SDEs with locally Lipschitz drift: Illustration on the FitzHugh–Nagumo model. Appl. Numer. Math., 179: 191–220, 2022

2022
[17]

Buckwar, M

E. Buckwar, M. Tamborrino, I. Tubikanec. Spectral density-based and measure-preserving ABC for partially observed diffusion processes. An illustration on Hamiltonian SDEs. Stat. Comput., 30: 627–648, 2020

2020
[18]

J. L. Cardy. Critical percolation in finite geometries. J. Phys. A, Math. Gen., 25 (4): 201–206, 1992

1992
[19]

J. L. Cardy. SLE for theoretical physicists. Ann. Phys., 318 (1): 81–118, 2005

2005
[20]

C. P. de Castro, M. Lukovi´ c, G. Pompanin, R. F. S. Andrade, H. J. Herrmann. Schramm–Loewner evolution and perimeter of percolation clusters of correlated random landscapes. Sci. Rep., 8, 5286, 2018

2018
[21]

Chelkak, H

D. Chelkak, H. Duminil-Copin, C. Hongler, A. Kemppainen, S. Smirnov. Convergence des interfaces d’Ising vers les courbes SLE introduites par Schramm. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I-Math., 352: 157–161, 2014

2014
[22]

J. Chen, V. Margarint. Perturbations of multiple Schramm–Loewner evolution with two non-colliding Dyson Brownian motions. Sto. Process. Appl., 151: 553–569 (2022)

2022
[23]

J. Chen. On the localization regime of high-dimensional directed polymers in time-correlated random field. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2412.14712, 2024

2024 arXiv
[24]

J. Chen, L. Laulin. Analysis of the smoothly amnesia-reinforced multidimensional elephant random walk. J. Stat. Phys., 190, 158, 2023

2023
[25]

J. M. C. Clark, R. J. Cameron. The maximum rate of convergence of discrete approximations for stochastic differential equations. Stoch. Diff. Syst. Filter. Control, Lect. Note. Control Inform. Sci., 25, 1980

1980
[26]

S. N. Cohen, R. J. Elliott. Stochastic Calculus and Applications. Springer Probab., Appl., 2nd ed., 2015

2015
[27]

H. F. Credidio, A. A. Moreira, H. J. Herrmann, J. S. Andrade. Stochastic Loewner evolution relates anomalous diffusion and anisotropic percolation. Phys. Rev. E, 93, 042124, 2016

2016
[28]

S. Darses. Time reversal for drifted fractional Brownian motion with Hurst index H >1/2. Electron. J. Probab., 12 (43): 1181–1211, 2007

2007
[29]

de Branges

L. de Branges. A proof of the Bieberbach conjecture. Acta Math., 154 (1-2): 137–152, 1985

1985
[30]

J. E. Dennis, R. B. Schnabel. Numerical Methods for Unconstrained Optimization and Nonlinear Equations. Classic. Appl. Math., Illustrated ed., 16, 1987. 17

1987
[31]

Duplantier, K.-H

B. Duplantier, K.-H. Kwon. Conformal invariance and intersections of random walks. Phys. Rev. Lett., 61 (22): 2514–2517, 1988

1988
[32]

Duplantier, S

B. Duplantier, S. Sheffield. Schramm–Loewner evolution and Liouville quantum gravity. Phys. Rev. Lett., 107, 131305, 2011

2011
[33]

L. C. Evans. An Introduction to Stochastic Differential Equations. American Math. Soc., 1st ed., 2014

2014
[34]

G. B. Folland. Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and Their Applications. Pure Appl. Math., 2nd ed., 1984

1984
[35]

J. Foster. Numerical simulation of Schramm–Loewner Evolution. GitHub Reposit., https://github.com/james-m- foster/sle-simulation 2020

2020
[36]

Foster, G

J. Foster, G. dos Reis, C. Strange. High order splitting methods for SDEs satisfying a commutativity condition. SIAM J. Numeri. Analy., 62, 10.1137/23M155147X, 2024

2024 doi
[38]

P. K. Friz, N. B. Victoir. Multidimensional Stochastic Processes as Rough Paths. Cambridge Studi. Adv. Math., 120, 2010

2010
[39]

Ghasemi Nezhadhaghighi, M

M. Ghasemi Nezhadhaghighi, M. A. Rajabpour, S. Rouhani. First-passage-time processes and subordinated Schramm–Loewner evolution. Phys. Rev. E , 84, 011134, 2011

2011
[40]

Q.-Y. Guan, M. Winkel. SLE and α-SLE driven by L´ evy processes.Ann. Probab., 36 (4): 1221–1266, 2008

2008
[41]

H. J. Herrmann, H. E. Stanley. The fractal dimension of the minimum path in two- and three-dimensional percolation. J. Phys. A, Math. Gen., 21: 829–833, 1988

1988
[42]

Johansson, A

F. Johansson, A. Sola. Rescaled L´ evy–Loewner hulls and random growth. Bull. Sci. Math., 133 (3): 238–256, 2009

2009
[43]

Kager, B

W. Kager, B. Nienhuis, L. Kadanoff. Exact solutions for Loewner evolutions. J. Stat. Phys., 115: 805–822, 2004

2004
[44]

Kemppainen

A. Kemppainen. Schramm–Loewner Evolution. Springer Brief. Math. Phys., 24, 2017

2017
[45]

T. Kennedy. A fast algorithm for simulating the chordal Schramm–Loewner evolution. J. Stat. Phys., 128: 1125–1137, 2007

2007
[46]

T. Kennedy. Computing the Loewner driving process of random curves in the half plane. J. Stat. Phys., 131: 803–819, 2008

2008
[47]

T. Kennedy. Numerical computations for the Schramm–Loewner evolution. J. Stat. Phys., 137: 839–856, 2009

2009
[48]

Kious, C

D. Kious, C. Mailler, B. Schapira. Finding geodesics on graphs using reinforcement learning. Ann. Appl. Probab., 32 (5): 3889–3929, 2022

2022
[49]

Kious, C

D. Kious, C. Mailler, B. Schapira. The trace-reinforced ants process does not find shortest paths. J. ´Eco. Polytech. Math., 9: 505–536, 2022

2022
[50]

Interpolation

R. K¨ uhnau. Numerische realisierung konformer abbildungen durch “Interpolation”. Z. Angew. Math. Mech., 63: 631–637, 1983

1983
[51]

Langlands, P

R. Langlands, P. Pouliot, Y. Saint-Aubin. Conformal invariance in two-dimensional percolation. Bull. American Math. Soc., 30: 1–61, 1994

1994
[52]

G. Lawler. Conformally Invariant Processes in the Plane. American Math. Soc, Math. Sur. Mon., 114, 2005

2005
[53]

Lawler, V

G. Lawler, V. Limic. Random Walk: A Modern Introduction. Cambridge Studi. Adv. Math., 123, 2012

2012
[54]

Lawler, O

G. Lawler, O. Schramm, W. Werner. Conformal invariance of planar loop-erased random walks and uniform spanning trees. Ann. Probab., 32 (1B): 939–995, 2004. 18

2004
[55]

Lawler, S

G. Lawler, S. Sheffield. A natural parametrization for the Schramm–Loewner evolution. Ann. Probab., 39 (5): 1896–1937, 2011

1937
[56]

Lawler, F

G. Lawler, F. Viklund. Convergence of loop-erased random walk in the natural parameterization. Duke Math. J., 170 (10): 2289–2370, 2021

2021
[57]

Limic, P

V. Limic, P. Tarr` es. Attracting edge and strongly edge reinforced walks. Ann. Probab., 35 (5): 1783–1806, 2007

2007
[58]

J. Lind, S. Rohde. Spacefilling curves and phases of the Loewner equation. Indiana Univ. Math. J., 61 (6): 2231–2249, 2012

2012
[59]

J. Lind, J. Utley. Phase transition for a family of complex-driven Loewner hulls. Involve, 15 (3): 447–474, 2022

2022
[60]

C. Loewner. Untersuchungen ¨ uber schlichte konforme abbildungen des einheitskreises. I.Math. Ann., 89: 103–121, 1923

1923
[61]

J.-F. Le Gall. Brownian Motion, Martingales, and Stochastic Calculus. Springer Grad. Text. Math., 274, 2016

2016
[62]

M. Liu, H. Wu. Loop-erased random walk branch of uniform spanning tree in topological polygons. Bernoulli, 29 (2): 1555–1577, 2023

2023
[63]

B. B. Mandelbrot, J. W. van Ness. Fractional Brownian motions, fractional noises and applications. SIAM Rev., 10 (4): 422–437, 1968

1968
[64]

Margarint, A

V. Margarint, A. Shekhar, Y. Yuan. On Loewner chains driven by semimartingales and complex Bessel-type SDEs. Ann. Appl. Probab., to appear, 2021

2021
[65]

D. E. Marshall, S. Rohde. Convergence of a variant of the zipper algorithm for conformal mapping. SIAM J. Numer. Analy., 45: 2577–2609, 2007

2007
[66]

J. C. Mattingly, A. M. Stuart, D. J. Higham. Ergodicity for SDEs and approximations: locally Lipschitz vector fields and degenerate noise. Stoch. Process. Appl., 101: 185–232, 2002

2002
[67]

Merkl, S

F. Merkl, S. W. W. Rolles. Linearly edge-reinforced random walks. IMS Lect. Note.-Mon. Ser. Dyn. Stoch., 48: 66–77, 2006

2006
[68]

Miller, S

J. Miller, S. Sheffield. Quantum Loewner evolution. Duke Math. J., 165 (17): 3241–3378, 2016

2016
[69]

M. Najafi. Left passage probability of Schramm-Loewner Evolution. Phys. Rev. E, 87, 062105, 2013

2013
[70]

M. Najafi. Fokker–Planck equation of Schramm-Loewner evolution. Phys. Rev. E 92, 022113, 2015

2015
[71]

Najafi, S

M. Najafi, S. Tizdast, J. Cheraghalizadeh. Schramm–Loewner evolution in the random scatterer Henon- percolation landscapes. Acta Phys. Polonica B, 50: 929–942, 2019

2019
[72]

Oikonomou, I

P. Oikonomou, I. Rushkin, I. A. Gruzberg, L. P. Kadanoff. Global properties of stochastic Loewner evolution driven by L´ evy processes.J. Stat. Mech.: Theor. Exp., P01019, 2008

2008
[73]

E. A. Oliveira, K. J. Schrenk, N. A. M. Ara´ ujo, H. J. Herrmann, J. S. Andrade. Optimal-path cracks in correlated and uncorrelated lattices. Phys. Rev. E, 83, 046113, 2011

2011
[74]

Peltola, A

E. Peltola, A. Schreuder. Loewner traces driven by L´ evy processes. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2407.06144, 2024

2024
[75]

Pemantle

R. Pemantle. A survey of random processes with reinforcement. Probab. Survey., 4: 1–79, 2007

2007
[76]

W. P. Petersen. A general implicit splitting for stabilizing numerical simulations of Ito stochastic differential equations. SIAM J. Numer. Analy., 35: 1439–1451, 1998

1998
[77]

Pommerenke

C. Pommerenke. Boundary Behaviour of Conformal Maps. Grundlehren Math. Wiss., 299, 1992

1992
[78]

I. S. Reed, P. C. Lee, T. K. Truong. Spectral representation of fractional Brownian motion in n dimensions and its properties. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theor., 41 (5): 1439–1451, 1995. 19

1995
[79]

Rohde, O

S. Rohde, O. Schramm. Basic properties of SLE. Ann. Math., 161 (2): 883–924, 2005

2005
[80]

Rohde, D

S. Rohde, D. Zhan. Backward SLE and the symmetry of the welding. Probab. Theor. Relat. Field., 164: 815–863, 2016

2016
[81]

Rosales-Ortiz

A. Rosales-Ortiz. Noise reinforced L´ evy processes: L´ evy–Itˆ o decomposition and applications.Electron. J. Probab., 28: 1-58, 2023

2023
[82]

Rushkin, P

I. Rushkin, P. Oikonomou, L. P. Kadanoff, I. A. Gruzberg. Stochastic Loewner evolution driven by L´ evy processes. J. Stat. Mech.: Theor. Exp., P01001, 2006

2006
[83]

Sabot, P

C. Sabot, P. Tarr` es. Edge-reinforced random walk, vertex-reinforced jump process and the supersymmetric hyperbolic sigma model. J. European Math. Soc., 17 (9): 2353–2378, 2015

2015
[84]

O. Schramm. Scaling limits of loop-erased random walks and uniform spanning tree. Israel J. Math., 118: 221–288, 2000

2000
[85]

Schramm, S

O. Schramm, S. Sheffield. Contour lines of the two-dimensional discrete Gaussian free field. Acta Math., 202 (1): 21–137, 2009

2009
[86]

Shekhar, H

A. Shekhar, H. Tran, Y. Wang. Remarks on Loewner chains driven by finite variation functions. Ann. Acad. Scient. Fennicæ, 44 (1): 311–327, 2019

2019
[87]

Schmittbuhl, J.-P

J. Schmittbuhl, J.-P. Vilotte, S. Roux. Percolation through self-affine surfaces. J. Phys. A, Math. Gen., 26: 6115–6133, 1993

1993
[88]

Shevchenko

G. Shevchenko. Fractional Brownian motion in a nutshell. Int. J. Mod. Phys., 36, 1560002, 2015

2015
[89]

Tanaka, A

M. Tanaka, A. Kayama, R. Kato, Y. Ito. Estimation of the fractal dimension of fracture surface patterns by box-counting method. Fractals, 7 (3): 335–340, 1999

1999
[91]

H. Tran. Convergence of an algorithm simulating Loewner curves. Ann. Acad. Scient. Fennicæ, 40: 601–616, 2015

2015
[92]

F. J. Viklund, G. Lawler. Optimal H¨ older exponent for The SLE path. Duke Math. J., 159: 351–383, 2011

2011
[93]

F. J. Viklund, S. Rohde, C. Wong. On the continuity of SLE κ in κ. Probab. Theor. Relat. Field., 159: 413–433, 2014

2014
[94]

Weinrib, B

A. Weinrib, B. I. Halperin. Critical phenomena in systems with long-range-correlated quenched disorder. Phys. Rev. B, 27 (1): 413–427, 1983

1983
[95]

J. Weiss. Self-affinity of fracture surfaces and implications on a possible size effect on fracture energy. Int. J. Fract., 109 (4): 365–381, 2001

2001
[96]

W. Werner. Random planar curves and Schramm–Loewner evolutions. Springer Lect. Probab. Theor. Stat., 1840: 107–195, 2004. 20

2004

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [37]

Foster, T

J. Foster, T. Lyons, V. Margarint. An asymptotic radius of convergence for the Loewner equation and simulation of SLEκ traces via splitting. J. Stat. Phys., 189, 18, 2022

work page 2022

[2] [90]

Tizdast, Z

S. Tizdast, Z. Ebadi, J. Cheraghalizadeh, M. N. Najafi, J. S. Andrade, H. J. Herrmann. Self-similar but not conformally invariant traces obtained by modified Loewner forces. Phys. Rev. E, 105, 024103, 2022

work page 2022

[3] [1]

Ableidinger, E

M. Ableidinger, E. Buckwar. Splitting integrators for the stochastic Landau–Lifshitz equation. SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 38: 1788–1806, 2016

2016

[4] [2]

A. Aharony. Old and new results on multicritical points. J. Stat. Phys., 110: 659–669, 2003

2003

[5] [3]

J. W. Anderson. Hyperbolic Geometry. Springer Undergrad. Math. Ser., 1st ed., 1999

1999

[6] [4]

M. Ang, G. R´ emy, X. Sun. FZZ formula of boundary Liouville CFT via conformal welding. J. European Math. Soc., to appear, 2023

2023

[7] [5]

Z.-D. Bai, F. Hu, L.-X. Zhang. Gaussian approximation theorems for urn models and their applications. Ann. Appl. Probab., 12 (4): 1149–1173, 2002

2002

[8] [6]

R. O. Bauer. Discrete L¨ owner evolution. Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse Math., 12 (4): 433–451, 2003. 16

2003