Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 63 references

Compact and robust design of the optical system for cold atom interferometer in space

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper reports that a dual-species atom interferometer's laser system was simplified to two seed lasers, one tapered amplifier, and one modulator, and that this compact optical bench has operated and produced atom interference aboard…

desk verdict A real flown space AI optical system with a genuine integration advance, but the headline stability claim is only supported for the cooling channels, not the Raman beam. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.03362 v1 pith:5YWIVUL3 submitted 2025-07-04 physics.atom-ph physics.optics

Danfang Zhang , Jinting Li , Wenzhang Wang , Weihao Xu , Jie Fang , Xiao Li , Qunfeng Chen , Yibo Wang
show 6 more authors
Biao Tang Lin Zhou Jiaqi Zhong Xi Chen Jin Wang Mingsheng Zhan
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-phphysics.optics PACS 37.25.+k42.62.Fi
keywords coldatominterferometryspacepayloaddual-speciesinterferometerfusedsilicaopticalbenchsidebandfrequencylockingtaperedamplifierelectro-opticphasemodulatorlaserpowerstability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

An atom interferometer in orbit needs laser light for cooling, state preparation, Raman interrogation, and detection, for two rubidium isotopes at once, while fitting inside tight volume, weight, power, and heat budgets. This paper argues that combining sideband frequency locking with electro-optic sideband generation and a single tapered amplifier reduces the hardware for that task to two seed lasers, one amplifier, and one acousto-optic modulator, with no loss of required function. It reports the flight design for the China Space Station atom interferometer: a 6.2-liter, 5.2 kg fused-silica optical bench that passed ground vibration and thermal tests, survived launch, and has run for more than two years in orbit. Cold atom preparation and atom interference for both rubidium species were realized in space, with monitored output powers fluctuating less than 2.5% over months. If this simplification holds, future space cold-atom instruments, such as gravimeters, gyroscopes, and clocks, can start from a much smaller laser-system budget.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing arrangement is the combination of sideband frequency locking (SFL) and phase-modulation sideband generation (PMSG) with synchronous amplification in one tapered amplifier. SFL locks a laser sideband to an atomic spectrum reference so that the seed carrier's frequency can be shifted by hundreds of megahertz to gigahertz within milliseconds, replacing a slave laser; PMSG creates the companion frequency for each species as the +1 order sideband of the same seed laser, replacing chains of acousto-optic modulators. The two species' beams are combined on a polarizing beam splitter, split by a liquid-crystal variable retarder for power-ratio control, and amplified together by the single TA, so the hardware count collapses to two seed lasers, one TA, and one 80 MHz AOM. Mechanically, the argument is carried by a fused-silica optical bench with compact components bonded on both sides, copper-braid heat conductors to the aluminum frame, and Teflon-buffered mounting holes that protect the brittle bench from launch vibration.

What would settle it

Inspect the in-orbit telemetry or run a four-month experiment that records the Raman output power alongside the two cooling channels; if the Raman channel's month-scale standard deviation exceeds 2.5%, or if the atom-interference fringe contrast and phase track Raman power drift, the blanket long-term-stability claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a dual-species atom interferometer in space does not need the usual rack of five independent laser sources; the full sequence of laser cooling, polarization-gradient cooling, state preparation, Raman transitions, and fluorescence detection can be generated from two distributed-feedback seed lasers, one tapered amplifier, and one acousto-optic modulator. The two seed carriers serve as the primary frequencies for the 87Rb and 85Rb interferometers, the +1 sidebands produced by fiber electro-optic phase modulators serve as the second frequencies for each species, and a single tapered amplifier boosts both combined beams after an adjustable power-ratio split. The authors report that this architecture, bonded onto a fused-silica bench, delivered the required frequency ranges and power levels on the ground, passed vibration and thermal qualification, survived launch, and then supported laser cooling and atom interference for both isotopes aboard the China Space Station. They further report that the output powers measured over four months in orbit had standard deviations of 2.5% and 1.4% for the two cooling beams, and that the whole optical assembly was the most compact among the AI laser systems they compare against.

Load-bearing premise

The blanket in-orbit stability claim of less than 2.5% over months is backed only by the 2D-MOT and 3D-MOT cooling-beam monitors; the Raman output, whose power stability directly affects interference-phase fidelity, was not included in the long-term measurement.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Dual-species atom interferometry in space can be supported by a 6.2-liter laser system, the most compact among the AI optical systems the paper tabulates.
  • The SFL-plus-PMSG-plus-single-TA architecture gives future space cold-atom payloads a concrete template for cutting laser counts, power draw, and alignment complexity.
  • The flight record places a flight-qualified bound on what a bonded fused-silica bench can tolerate: less than 15% output power change from ground to orbit, then month-scale fluctuations below 2.5% on the monitored cooling channels.
  • The demonstrated frequency and amplitude tuning ranges cover the cooling, PGC, state-preparation, Raman, and detection stages for both 87Rb and 85Rb, so the same optical bench can serve atomic clocks, gravimeters, and gyroscopes built around Raman interferometry.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper's reported scope, the same architecture should generalize to other species pairs, provided their required carrier and sideband frequencies fall within one tapered amplifier's gain bandwidth and the single retarder can set the needed power ratio; the paper does not test such pairs.
  • An audit implication is direct: because the 2.5% long-term stability figure comes from the 2D-MOT and 3D-MOT monitors, a month-scale in-orbit record of the Raman output, correlated with fringe contrast and phase, is the missing check of whether the most interferometry-critical beam is equally stable.
  • A testable engineering extension follows from the paper's coupling model: if most of the 15% ground-to-orbit power change is angle-driven misalignment at the fiber couplers, active beam steering or fiber-coupling feedback should recover nearly all of that loss.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports the design, assembly, ground testing, and in-orbit performance of the optical system for the China Space Station atom interferometer (CSSAI), a dual-species 87Rb/85Rb atom interferometer. The system uses sideband frequency locking and phase-modulation sideband generation to generate all required laser fields from two seed lasers, one tapered amplifier, and one AOM. A fused-silica optical bench with bonded components, vibration-isolation mounts, and heat-conducting devices is described. The authors report that the optical system passed thermal (15–32°C) and vibration (4.28 g RMS) tests, was launched in 2022, and has operated in orbit for over two years. Output laser power changes from ground to space were within 15%, long-term power fluctuations over four months were 2.5% and 1.4% for the 2D-MOT and 3D-MOT channels, and cold atom preparation and atom interference were realized in space (with details in companion papers). The paper emphasizes the compactness (6.2 L, 5.2 kg) and robustness of the design.

Significance. If the performance claims are accurate, this is a significant engineering contribution: it demonstrates a compact, robust optical system for a dual-species space atom interferometer, validated by environmental tests and more than two years of in-orbit operation. The system's architecture—sideband locking plus a single TA—offers a useful simplification compared to earlier multi-laser designs. The paper provides concrete, externally benchmarked data (Table 1, Figs. 9–10) and is supported by published atom-interference results (refs 56, 63). The main weaknesses are inconsistencies in reported dimensions and an overbroad long-term stability claim, which do not invalidate the design but need correction.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and Section 5.1] The abstract states the assembled optical system has dimensions 250 mm × 240 mm × 104 mm, while Section 5.1 reports 250 mm × 240 mm × 110 mm. This also affects the claimed volume: 6.2 L (Abstract) versus 6.6 L if the 110 mm height is used. Since compactness is a central claim of the paper, the correct dimension should be stated consistently in both places.
  2. [Abstract, Section 5.3, Fig. 10c] The long-term stability claim of less than 2.5% fluctuations over months is presented in the abstract and Section 6 as a property of the optical system's output lasers. However, Section 5.3 reports long-term power recordings only for the 2D-MOT and 3D-MOT output channels (standard deviations 2.5% and 1.4% over 4 months, Fig. 10c); the Raman output channel, which directly sets the Rabi frequency for the interferometer, is not included in this record. Table 1 shows the Raman channel had the largest ground-to-orbit shift (+14.09%), so the blanket statement is not supported for the interferometry-critical beam. The claim should be restricted to the monitored channels or supplemented with Raman-channel telemetry.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 5.1] The phrase 'turning range' appears twice and should read 'tuning range'.
  2. [Section 6] The text says 'the fused silicon is employed as the optical bench'; this should be 'fused silica'.
  3. [References] Several references use 'Nat. Commmun.' (refs 19, 31, 32, 47) instead of 'Nat. Commun.', and ref 3 uses 'Ser. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.' instead of 'J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.'.
  4. [Section 5.2] The vibration level is given as 'standard deviation of 4.28 g from 10 to 2000 Hz'; if this is a random vibration level, it should be specified as RMS (e.g., 4.28 g RMS).
  5. [Sections 1 and 6] The claim that the optical system is 'the most compact one among typical reported optical systems' is not substantiated by a comparative table; providing volumes of the cited systems would make the claim verifiable.
  6. [Section 5.3] The sentence 'The standard deviations of the relative powers are 2.5% and 1.4% respectively' should explicitly identify these as corresponding to the 2D-MOT and 3D-MOT channels in order.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: design and in-orbit performance claims are supported by independent measurements and standard coupling-efficiency calculations.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are engineering results rather than derivations from fitted inputs. The coupling-efficiency formula (Eq. 1) is a standard optical relation taken from the literature, and the predicted power variations in Sections 4.2 and 4.3 are obtained from finite-element deformation simulations combined with that formula; they are not fitted to the subsequently reported ground or in-orbit power measurements. The measured powers in Table 1, Fig. 10b, and Fig. 10c provide independent external benchmarks. The self-citations to refs. 56 and 63 are prior published realizations of ground-based and in-orbit atom interference used as supporting experimental evidence, not as an imported uniqueness theorem or an ansatz that forces the design choices. The reader's flagged weakness, that the long-term <2.5% fluctuation claim is based only on the 2D-MOT and 3D-MOT monitored channels and not on the Raman output, is an evidentiary scope limitation rather than a circular argument: the claim does not reduce by construction to its own inputs, though the statement in the abstract and Section 6 is broader than the data shown. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no known result is repackaged as a new derivation. Therefore the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is an engineering report; there are no fitted free parameters. The load-bearing premises are modeling assumptions (FEA fidelity, coupling formula parameters) and the representativeness of ground tests. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The simplified finite element model, which omits detailed component features but retains dimensions and materials, reproduces the thermal and gravity-induced deformations of the real optical system with sufficient accuracy.
    Section 4.1 states the model simplification; no mesh, boundary conditions, material property tables, or validation against measured deformations are provided, so all derived power-variation predictions rest on this assumption.
  • domain assumption The Gaussian-mode coupling model (Eq. 1) with the stated spot sizes (omega_a = omega_s about 0.6 mm) and the assumed offsets (r = 10 microns, theta = 100 microradians) quantitatively predicts the fiber-coupling efficiency change.
    Section 4.1 uses Eq. 1 to translate simulated angle changes into output power variations; the formula is standard but the parameters are given without uncertainty and the linearized angle-only approximation is asserted.
  • domain assumption The ground thermal test (15-32 Celsius) and vibration test (4.28 g RMS, 10-2000 Hz) are representative of the launch and on-orbit mechanical and thermal environment, and the recorded power changes before and after these tests bound the in-flight behavior.
    Section 5.2 describes the tests; the correlation between ground test levels and actual flight loads is not established, and the observed larger in-orbit variations (up to 14%) indicate the ground tests may not fully cover flight conditions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Compact and robust design of the optical system for cold atom interferometer in space." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5YWIVUL3

@misc{pith2026250703362,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Compact and robust design of the optical system for cold atom interferometer in space},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5YWIVUL3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.03362}
}
read the original abstract

The optical system is a complex and precise subsystem for the atom interferometer (AI), especially for those used in field or space applications. Here, we introduce the design of the optical system of the China Space Station atom interferometer (CSSAI). The scheme is optimized to reduce the complexity while maintaining the capability to achieve the dual-species AI. It features a fused silica optical bench with bonding technology, ensuring compactness and smaller thermal deformation. Spatial structures are designed to isolate the vibration and transfer the heat. After assembling, the optical system has a size of 250 mm * 240 mm * 104 mm and weighs 5.2 kg. After installing in the CSSAI, it passed the thermal and mechanical tests and then launched to the China Space Station (CSS). The output laser power changes are less than 15% from ground to space, and its long-term fluctuations are less than 2.5% for months in space. Cold atom preparation and interference are also realized in space. This optical system is extremely integrated and robust, which provides a foundation for the design of future cold atom payloads in space.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.03362 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The installation of the China Space Station atom interferometer (CSSAI) in the High Microgravity Level Research Rack (HMLR), the structure of the CSSAI, and the requirement for the size of its optical system. Lasers with different frequencies are needed for AI at different stages. This includes laser cooling, state preparation, atom interference, and atom fluorescence detection. For each stage, at least two lasers w… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. The design of the F-P cavity in optical system and its test result. (a) Structure and material of the F-P cavity. (b) The measured transmission spectrum of the F-P cavity during the Raman transition process when the CSSAI carries out the dual-species AI experiment. The majority of the output laser of the TA is sent to the laser power controlling and distribution part (Fig. 3G). The laser beam passes through an 80 MH… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Atomic interferometry using stimulated Raman transitions,

    M. Kasevich and S. Chu, "Atomic interferometry using stimulated Raman transitions," Phys. Rev. Lett. 67(2), 181-184 (1991)

    work page 1991

  2. [2]

    High-precision gravity measurements using atom interferometry,

    A. Peters, K. Y. Chung, and S. Chu, "High-precision gravity measurements using atom interferometry," Metrologia 38(1), 25-61 (2001)

    work page 2001

  3. [3]

    Mobile quantum gravity sensor with unprecedented stability,

    C. Freier, M. Hauth, V. Schkolnik, et al., "Mobile quantum gravity sensor with unprecedented stability," Ser. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 723, 012050 (2016)

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    Gravity measurements below 10−9 g with a transportable absolute quantum gravimeter,

    V. Ménoret, P. Vermeulen, N. Le Moigne, et al., "Gravity measurements below 10−9 g with a transportable absolute quantum gravimeter," Sci. Rep. 8(1), 12300 (2018)

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    A new type of compact gravimeter for long-term absolute gravity monitoring,

    Z. Fu, B. Wu, B. Cheng, et al., "A new type of compact gravimeter for long-term absolute gravity monitoring," Metrologia 56(2), 025001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Accuracy and stability evaluation of the 85Rb atom gravimeter WAG-H5-1 at the 2017 International Comparison of Absolute Gravimeters,

    P.-W. Huang, B. Tang, X. Chen, et al., "Accuracy and stability evaluation of the 85Rb atom gravimeter WAG-H5-1 at the 2017 International Comparison of Absolute Gravimeters," Metrologia 56(4), 045012 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Portable atomic gravimeter operating in noisy urban environments,

    B. Chen, J. Long, H. Xie, et al., "Portable atomic gravimeter operating in noisy urban environments," Chin. Opt. Lett. 18(9), 090201 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Evaluation of the transportable atom gravimeter HUST-QG,

    Y.-Y. Xu, J.-F. Cui, K. Qi, et al., "Evaluation of the transportable atom gravimeter HUST-QG," Metrologia 59(5), 055001 (2022)

    work page 2022

Show all 63 references
  1. [9]

    Measurement of the Earth's gravity gradient with an atom interferometer- based gravity gradiometer,

    M. J. Snadden, J. M. McGuirk, P. Bouyer, et al., "Measurement of the Earth's gravity gradient with an atom interferometer- based gravity gradiometer," Phys. Rev. Lett. 81(5), 971-974 (1998)

    1998

  2. [10]

    Quantum sensing for gravity cartography,

    B. Stray, A. Lamb, A. Kaushik, et al., "Quantum sensing for gravity cartography," Nature 602(7898), 590-594 (2022)

    2022

  3. [11]

    Compact high-resolution absolute-gravity gradiometer based on atom interferometers,

    W. Lyu, J.-Q. Zhong, X.-W. Zhang, et al., "Compact high-resolution absolute-gravity gradiometer based on atom interferometers," Phys. Rev. Appl. 18(5), 054091 (2022)

    2022

  4. [12]

    Precision rotation measurements with an atom interferometer gyroscope,

    T. L. Gustavson, P. Bouyer, and M. A. Kasevich, "Precision rotation measurements with an atom interferometer gyroscope," Phys. Rev. Lett. 78(11), 2046-2049 (1997)

    1997

  5. [13]

    Continuous Cold-Atom Inertial Sensor with1 nrad/secRotation Stability,

    I. Dutta, D. Savoie, B. Fang, et al., "Continuous Cold-Atom Inertial Sensor with1 nrad/secRotation Stability," Phys. Rev. Lett. 116(18), 183003 (2016)

    2016

  6. [14]

    Self-alignment of a large-area dual-atom-interferometer gyroscope using parameter-decoupled phase-seeking calibrations,

    Z.-W. Yao, H.-H. Chen, S.-B. Lu, et al., "Self-alignment of a large-area dual-atom-interferometer gyroscope using parameter-decoupled phase-seeking calibrations," Phys. Rev. A 103(2), 023319 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    Closed-loop dual-atom-interferometer inertial sensor with continuous cold atomic beams,

    Z.-X. Meng, P.-Q. Yan, S.-Z. Wang, et al., "Closed-loop dual-atom-interferometer inertial sensor with continuous cold atomic beams," Phys. Rev. Appl. 21(3), 034050 (2024)

    2024

  8. [16]

    New method for gravitational wave detection with atomic sensors,

    P. W. Graham, J. M. Hogan, M. A. Kasevich, et al., "New method for gravitational wave detection with atomic sensors," Phys. Rev. Lett. 110(17), 171102 (2013)

    2013

  9. [17]

    Atom-interferometry constraints on dark energy,

    P. Hamilton, M. Jaffe, P. Haslinger, et al., "Atom-interferometry constraints on dark energy," Science 349(6250), 849-851 (2015)

    2015

  10. [18]

    Test of the Universality of Free Fall with Atoms in Different Spin Orientations,

    X.-C. Duan, X.-B. Deng, M.-K. Zhou, et al., "Test of the Universality of Free Fall with Atoms in Different Spin Orientations," Phys. Rev. Lett. 117(2), 023001 (2016)

    2016

  11. [19]

    Quantum test of the equivalence principle for atoms in coherent superposition of internal energy states,

    G. Rosi, G. D’Amico, L. Cacciapuoti, et al., "Quantum test of the equivalence principle for atoms in coherent superposition of internal energy states," Nat. Commmun. 8(1), 15529 (2017)

    2017

  12. [20]

    Atom-Interferometric Test of the Equivalence Principle at the 10 −12 Level,

    P. Asenbaum, C. Overstreet, M. Kim, et al., "Atom-Interferometric Test of the Equivalence Principle at the 10 −12 Level," Phys. Rev. Lett. 125(19), 191101 (2020)

    2020

  13. [21]

    Determination of the fine-structure constant with an accuracy of 81 parts per trillion,

    L. Morel, Z. Yao, P. Cladé, et al., "Determination of the fine-structure constant with an accuracy of 81 parts per trillion," Nature 588(7836), 61-65 (2020)

    2020

  14. [22]

    Joint mass-and-energy test of the equivalence principle at the 10−10 level using atoms with specified mass and internal energy,

    L. Zhou, C. He, S.-T. Yan, et al., "Joint mass-and-energy test of the equivalence principle at the 10−10 level using atoms with specified mass and internal energy," Phys. Rev. A 104(2), 022822 (2021)

    2021

  15. [23]

    Atom interferometer tests of dark matter,

    Y. Du, C. Murgui, K. Pardo, et al., "Atom interferometer tests of dark matter," Phys. Rev. D 106(9), 095041 (2022)

    2022

  16. [24]

    A scalable, symmetric atom interferometer for infrasound gravitational wave detection,

    C. Schubert, D. Schlippert, M. Gersemann, et al., "A scalable, symmetric atom interferometer for infrasound gravitational wave detection," AVS Quantum Sci 6(4), 044404 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    Single-photon large-momentum-transfer atom interferometry scheme for Sr or Yb atoms with application to determining the fine-structure constant,

    J. S. Schelfhout, T. M. Hird, K. M. Hughes, et al., "Single-photon large-momentum-transfer atom interferometry scheme for Sr or Yb atoms with application to determining the fine-structure constant," Phys. Rev. A 110(5), 053309 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    MOCASS: A satellite mission concept using cold atom interferometry for measuring the earth gravity field,

    F. Migliaccio, M. Reguzzoni, K. Batsukh, et al., "MOCASS: A satellite mission concept using cold atom interferometry for measuring the earth gravity field," Surv. Geophys. 40(5), 1029-1053 (2019)

    2019

  19. [27]

    Concept study and preliminary design of a cold atom interferometer for space gravity gradiometry,

    A. Trimeche, B. Battelier, D. Becker, et al., "Concept study and preliminary design of a cold atom interferometer for space gravity gradiometry," Class. Quantum Grav. 36(21), 215004 (2019)

    2019

  20. [28]

    Gravity field mapping using laser-coupled quantum accelerometers in space,

    T. Lévèque, C. Fallet, M. Mandea, et al., "Gravity field mapping using laser-coupled quantum accelerometers in space," J. Geod. 95(1), 15 (2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    Platform and environment requirements of a satellite quantum test of the weak equivalence principle at the 10−17 level,

    C. Struckmann, R. Corgier, S. Loriani, et al., "Platform and environment requirements of a satellite quantum test of the weak equivalence principle at the 10−17 level," Phys. Rev. D 109(6), 064010 (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    Interferometry with Bose-Einstein condensates in microgravity,

    H. Müntinga, H. Ahlers, M. Krutzik, et al., "Interferometry with Bose-Einstein condensates in microgravity," Phys. Rev. Lett. 110(9), 093602 (2013)

    2013

  23. [31]

    Ultracold atom interferometry in space,

    M. D. Lachmann, H. Ahlers, D. Becker, et al., "Ultracold atom interferometry in space," Nat. Commmun. 12(1), 1317 (2021)

    2021

  24. [32]

    Detecting inertial effects with airborne matter-wave interferometry,

    R. Geiger, V. Ménoret, G. Stern, et al., "Detecting inertial effects with airborne matter-wave interferometry," Nat. Commmun. 2(1), 474 (2011)

    2011

  25. [33]

    Pathfinder experiments with atom interferometry in the Cold Atom Lab onboard the International Space Station,

    J. R. Williams, C. A. Sackett, H. Ahlers, et al., "Pathfinder experiments with atom interferometry in the Cold Atom Lab onboard the International Space Station," Nat. Commmun. 15(1), 6414 (2024)

    2024

  26. [34]

    A portable laser system for high-precision atom interferometry experiments,

    M. Schmidt, M. Prevedelli, A. Giorgini, et al., "A portable laser system for high-precision atom interferometry experiments," Appl. Phys. B 102(1), 11-18 (2010)

    2010

  27. [35]

    Dual-wavelength laser source for onboard atom interferometry,

    V. Ménoret, R. Geiger, G. Stern, et al., "Dual-wavelength laser source for onboard atom interferometry," Opt. Lett. 36(21), 4128-4130 (2011)

    2011

  28. [36]

    A simple laser system for atom interferometry,

    S. Merlet, L. Volodimer, M. Lours, et al., "A simple laser system for atom interferometry," Appl. Phys. B 117(2), 749-754 (2014)

    2014

  29. [37]

    Narrow linewidth single laser source system for onboard atom interferometry,

    F. Theron, O. Carraz, G. Renon, et al., "Narrow linewidth single laser source system for onboard atom interferometry," Appl. Phys. B 118(1), 1-5 (2014)

    2014

  30. [38]

    A compact laser system for the cold atom gravimeter,

    Q. Wang, Z. Wang, Z. Fu, et al., "A compact laser system for the cold atom gravimeter," Opt. Commun. 358, 82-87 (2016)

    2016

  31. [39]

    A compact and robust diode laser system for atom interferometry on a sounding rocket,

    V. Schkolnik, O. Hellmig, A. Wenzlawski, et al., "A compact and robust diode laser system for atom interferometry on a sounding rocket," Appl. Phys. B 122(8), 217 (2016)

    2016

  32. [40]

    Multiaxis atom interferometry with a single-diode laser and a pyramidal magneto-optical trap,

    X. Wu, F. Zi, J. Dudley, et al., "Multiaxis atom interferometry with a single-diode laser and a pyramidal magneto-optical trap," Optica 4(12), 1545-1551 (2017)

    2017

  33. [41]

    Realization of a compact one-seed laser system for atom interferometer-based gravimeters,

    J. Fang, J. Hu, X. Chen, et al., "Realization of a compact one-seed laser system for atom interferometer-based gravimeters," Opt. Express 26(2), 1586-1596 (2018)

    2018

  34. [42]

    Compact portable laser system for mobile cold atom gravimeters,

    X. Zhang, J. Zhong, B. Tang, et al., "Compact portable laser system for mobile cold atom gravimeters," Appl. Opt. 57(22), 6545-6551 (2018)

    2018

  35. [43]

    A compact laser system for a portable atom interferometry gravimeter,

    Q. Luo, H. Zhang, K. Zhang, et al., "A compact laser system for a portable atom interferometry gravimeter," Rev. Sci. Instrum. 90(4), 043104 (2019)

    2019

  36. [44]

    A fibered laser system for the MIGA large scale atom interferometer,

    D. O. Sabulsky, J. Junca, G. Lefèvre, et al., "A fibered laser system for the MIGA large scale atom interferometer," Sci. Rep. 10(1), 3268 (2020)

    2020

  37. [45]

    A simplified laser system for atom interferometry based on a free-space EOM,

    B. Wu, Y. Zhao, B. Cheng, et al., "A simplified laser system for atom interferometry based on a free-space EOM," Photonics 9(5), 301 (2022)

    2022

  38. [46]

    Simple and robust architecture of a laser system for atom interferometry,

    S. Sarkar, R. Piccon, S. Merlet, et al., "Simple and robust architecture of a laser system for atom interferometry," Opt. Express 30(3), 3358-3366 (2022)

    2022

  39. [47]

    A compact cold-atom interferometer with a high data-rate grating magneto-optical trap and a photonic-integrated-circuit-compatible laser system,

    J. Lee, R. Ding, J. Christensen, et al., "A compact cold-atom interferometer with a high data-rate grating magneto-optical trap and a photonic-integrated-circuit-compatible laser system," Nat. Commmun. 13(1), 5131 (2022)

    2022

  40. [48]

    All-semiconductor-based systems for atom interferometry experiments in space,

    M. Bagheri, J. Hunacek, E. Kittlaus, et al., "All-semiconductor-based systems for atom interferometry experiments in space," J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 41(9), 1979-1985 (2024)

    2024

  41. [49]

    PHARAO laser source flight model: Design and performances,

    T. Lévèque, B. Faure, F. X. Esnault, et al., "PHARAO laser source flight model: Design and performances," Rev. Sci. Instrum. 86(3), 033104 (2015)

    2015

  42. [50]

    Highly reliable optical system for a rubidium space cold atom clock,

    W. Ren, Y. Sun, B. Wang, et al., "Highly reliable optical system for a rubidium space cold atom clock," Appl. Opt. 55(13), 3607-3614 (2016)

    2016

  43. [51]

    Cold atom microwave clock based on intracavity cooling in China space station,

    S. Deng, W. Ren, J. Xiang, et al., "Cold atom microwave clock based on intracavity cooling in China space station," npj Microgravity 10(1), 66 (2024)

    2024

  44. [52]

    NASA’s Cold Atom Lab (CAL): system development and ground test status,

    E. R. Elliott, M. C. Krutzik, J. R. Williams, et al., "NASA’s Cold Atom Lab (CAL): system development and ground test status," npj Microgravity 4(1), 16 (2018)

    2018

  45. [53]

    ZERODUR® based optical systems for quantum gas experiments in space,

    M. Mihm, J. P. Marburger, A. Wenzlawski, et al., "ZERODUR® based optical systems for quantum gas experiments in space," Acta Astronaut. 159, 166-169 (2019)

    2019

  46. [54]

    The design, realization, and validation of the scheme for quantum degenerate research in Microgravity,

    L. Li, W. Xiong, B. Wang, et al., "The design, realization, and validation of the scheme for quantum degenerate research in Microgravity," IEEE Photonics J 15(3), 1-8 (2023)

    2023

  47. [55]

    All-fiber laser system for all-optical 87Rb Bose Einstein condensate to space application,

    L. Li, C. Y. Zhou, W. Xiong, et al., "All-fiber laser system for all-optical 87Rb Bose Einstein condensate to space application," Appl. Opt. 62(29), 7844-7851 (2023)

    2023

  48. [56]

    The space cold atom interferometer for testing the equivalence principle in the China Space Station,

    M. He, X. Chen, J. Fang, et al., "The space cold atom interferometer for testing the equivalence principle in the China Space Station," npj Microgravity 9(1), 58 (2023)

    2023

  49. [57]

    Microgravity performance evaluation for zero gravity robot in China's space stationChina's Space Station,

    W. Liu and S. Wang, "Microgravity performance evaluation for zero gravity robot in China's space stationChina's Space Station," IEEE Aerosp. Electron. Syst. Mag. 37(1), 32-42 (2022)

    2022

  50. [58]

    Hierarchical control for microgravity vibration isolation system: collision avoidance and execution enhancement,

    A. Wang, S. Wang, G. Wang, et al., "Hierarchical control for microgravity vibration isolation system: collision avoidance and execution enhancement," IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 60(5), 6084-6094 (2024)

    2024

  51. [59]

    Locking laser frequency of up to 40 GHz offset to a reference with a 10 GHz electro- optic modulator,

    W. Peng, L. Zhou, S. Long, et al., "Locking laser frequency of up to 40 GHz offset to a reference with a 10 GHz electro- optic modulator," Opt. Lett. 39(10), 2998-3001 (2014)

    2014

  52. [60]

    Ultrastable, Zerodur-based optical benches for quantum gas experiments,

    H. Duncker, O. Hellmig, A. Wenzlawski, et al., "Ultrastable, Zerodur-based optical benches for quantum gas experiments," Appl. Opt. 53(20), 4468-4474 (2014)

    2014

  53. [61]

    Development of a compact optical absolute frequency reference for space with 10 −15 instability,

    T. Schuldt, K. Döringshoff, E. V. Kovalchuk, et al., "Development of a compact optical absolute frequency reference for space with 10 −15 instability," Appl. Opt. 56(4), 1101-1106 (2017)

    2017

  54. [62]

    Single-mode fiber auto-coupling system with wedges,

    B. Cao, Z. Qiu, K. Huang, et al., "Single-mode fiber auto-coupling system with wedges," Opt. Fiber Technol. 61, 102433 (2021)

    2021

  55. [63]

    Realization of a cold atom gyroscope in space,

    J. Li, X. Chen, D. Zhang, et al., "Realization of a cold atom gyroscope in space," Natl. Sci. Rev. 12(4), nwaf012 (2024)

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.