The physical properties of candidate neutrino-emitter blazars

Alessandra Azzollini; Alexis Coleiro; Ga\"etan Fichet de Clairfontaine; Jose Maria Sanchez Zaballa; Leonard Pfeiffer; Margot Boughelilba; Massimiliano Lincetto; Sara Buson

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 172 references

The physical properties of candidate neutrino-emitter blazars

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The 52 candidate neutrino-emitter blazars show a mild but consistent preference for radiatively efficient accretion and powerful radio jets, tying neutrino production to strong external radiation fields.

desk verdict Useful new spectra and a careful censored-data study; the HERG-preference claim needs a parent-catalog control before it can carry weight. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.03613 v2 pith:ANDNBWQD submitted 2025-07-04 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.GA

Alessandra Azzollini , Sara Buson , Alexis Coleiro , Gaëtan Fichet de Clairfontaine , Leonard Pfeiffer , Jose Maria Sanchez Zaballa , Margot Boughelilba , Massimiliano Lincetto This is my paper

classification astro-ph.HEastro-ph.GA

keywords neutrinoastrophysicsblazarsIceCubeHERG/LERGclassificationaccretionmodesopticalspectroscopyradiojetsmultimessengerastronomy

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Blazars are prime suspects for the sources of IceCube's astrophysical neutrinos, but which ones actually emit neutrinos, and why, remains unsettled. This paper takes the 52 blazars that a previous positional cross-correlation matched to IceCube hotspots and gives them a first multiwavelength physical characterization, using optical spectra to measure their accretion regime and radio and gamma-ray data to gauge jet power. The central result is that, while the sample remains statistically compatible with reference blazar populations, it shows a mild preference for sources with intense radiation fields, radiatively efficient accretion, and radio powers above the HERG-LERG divide: roughly 61% sit in the high-excitation (HERG) region of LBLR/LEdd, and 63% have radio power above about $10^{26}$ W/Hz. If genuine, this would tie neutrino production to environments rich in external photon fields, matching proton-photon interaction scenarios, and it would argue against treating historical BL Lac/FSRQ classifications as physically meaningful in neutrino stacking studies. The paper also demonstrates that survival-analysis tests commonly used with censored data can produce spurious significances as the fraction of upper limits grows, a caution that applies to much of the literature.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the physically driven HERG/LERG taxonomy applied to blazars, in which the Eddington-scaled broad-line-region luminosity LBLR/LEdd (threshold near 5e-4 for radiatively efficient accretion), the Eddington-scaled gamma-ray luminosity Lgamma/LEdd (threshold near 0.1), and the 1.4 GHz radio power P1.4GHz (threshold near $10^{26}$ W/Hz) replace the traditional equivalent-width split between BL Lacs and FSRQs. The machinery that carries the argument is optical spectroscopy: the authors measure or place upper limits on broad-line region lines (H-$\alpha$, H-$\beta$, Mg II, C IV), convert line luminosities to LBLR through the relative line ratios of a composite spectrum, estimate virial black hole masses and Eddington luminosities, and derive disk luminosities assuming a 10% BLR covering factor. On the statistical side, the paper employs the Peto logrank test with Kaplan-Meier estimators to handle censored data, after simulations showing that the test's false-positive rate grows with the fraction of upper limits and with sample size. That machinery lets the authors compare their 52 candidates with three literature samples and isolate which apparent differences are reliable.

What would settle it

Take a control sample of 52 blazars drawn randomly from 5BZCat with the same redshift and Fermi-detection distribution as the candidates, measure the same LBLR/LEdd and P1.4GHz fractions, and repeat the Peto logrank comparisons; if the control shows the same roughly 61-63% HERG-like and radio-loud fractions, the paper's population-level conclusion would not stand. Alternatively, when individual IceCube associations are confirmed through real-time alerts, the confirmed subset's HERG fraction should remain elevated; if it drops to the parent population level, the claimed preference is an artifact of the candidate selection.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that the 52 candidate neutrino-emitter ('PeVatron') blazars selected from IceCube hotspots are, as a population, mildly shifted toward high-excitation radio galaxy (HERG) characteristics: radiatively efficient accretion and powerful radio jets. After re-estimating black hole masses, broad-line-region luminosities, Eddington ratios, and radio powers from optical spectra and catalog data, the authors find that about 61% of the sample sits above the LBLR/LEdd ~ 5e-4 accretion-efficiency threshold and about 63% above P1.4GHz ~ $10^{26}$ W/Hz, with median values of LBLR/LEdd = $10^{-3}$ and Lgamma/LEdd = 9.73e-2. Only three comparisons survive correction for multiple trials at the roughly 3-$\sigma$ level (black hole mass versus one reference sample, and redshift and radio power versus another), so the authors do not claim a decisive separation from the general blazar population. Instead, they argue for a mild tendency: candidate neutrino emitters preferentially show efficient accretion, strong radiation fields, and high radio power, consistent with hadronic models in which protons interact with external photon fields. The paper also reclassifies four historically 'masquerading BL Lac' objects: three are HERG-like, while a newly analyzed GTC spectrum shows that 5BZB J0035+1515 is a LERG, undermining stacking studies that place such objects in the BL Lac subsample.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the 52 candidate blazars, which the paper itself says include a non-negligible number of chance associations, still represent neutrino-emitting blazars as a population; if most of them are spurious matches, the observed HERG-like tendency merely reflects the parent 5BZCat catalog.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the 52 candidates are genuinely neutrino-linked, their mild HERG-like shift implies that sources with radiatively efficient accretion and strong external radiation fields are favored neutrino factories, consistent with proton-photon interactions.
The reclassification of TXS 0506+056, PKS 1424+240, and 5BZB J0630-2406 as HERG-like means previous stacking limits on BL Lac neutrino flux contributions should be revisited, since these objects were counted in the wrong subsample.
The demonstration that Peto logrank p-values shrink as censoring fractions grow implies that published claims of differences between blazar subpopulations based on such tests need case-by-case simulation before being accepted.
The 24 Fermi-detected candidates span gamma-ray luminosities from about 10^42 to 10^48 erg/s, so gamma-ray brightness alone does not single out neutrino emitters; accretion and radio properties carry additional discriminating information.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A testable extension: stack IceCube events on HERG-classified versus LERG-classified blazars using this physical taxonomy rather than BLL/FSRQ labels; the model predicts excess emission preferentially on the HERG-like subset.
If the HERG preference is real, 'changing-look' blazars should appear disproportionately among future neutrino candidates, since their apparent line variability masks a stable efficient-accretion engine.
The censoring-sensitivity result suggests that re-analysis of older flux-limit comparisons in AGN surveys, using mock samples with matched upper-limit fractions, would be a worthwhile methodological companion to any future catalog-level neutrino association study.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take: this is a useful observational paper, not a discovery paper. The genuinely new bits are the spectra and the population characterization: twelve new observations across VLT/Gemini/GTC, including a new z=0.57 for 5BZB J0035+1515 that moves it from blue-FSRQ candidate to LERG, plus the first systematic comparison of the 52 Buson candidates with S12/P17/P21. The spectral-line work is careful, the simulations of logrank/Peto behavior are a real service, and the authors are admirably explicit that the 52 include spurious associations and that their tests are sensitive to censoring.

The soft spot is the central "mild preference for HERG-like objects." As stated, ~61% above LBLR/LEdd and ~63% above P1.4GHz are absolute fractions, not fractions relative to what 5BZCat would give. The one direct parent-catalog comparison in Table A.3—radio power vs. BZCat—has Peto p=0.233, i.e., no detectable difference from the catalog the sample was drawn from. The significant S12 comparison is against a sample the authors themselves say is skewed to low z and low radio power. So if there is a HERG-like excess over the parent population, this paper has not established it. Given the expected contamination, the null result against BZCat is pretty much what you would expect. The LBLR/LEdd "preference" is not benchmarked against BZCat at all. The authors mostly use hedged language, but the conclusion section still says they "are more HERG-like in terms of jet power"—that overstates what the data show.

The other issues are minor: uniform gamma-ray upper limits at a nominal 10-yr sensitivity, no propagation of factor 2-4 systematics into the survival tests, and the p/0.01 correction. The correction is ad hoc but conservative and documented; I would rather see a simulation-calibrated version, but it is not a red flag. The MBH-vs-P17 discrepancy may be real, but it is not the paper's main point.

Who is this for? People working on blazar-neutrino associations and on censored-data methods in AGN samples. The new spectra and the careful comparison table justify publication. A referee should push for a proper 5BZCat control (or at least an explicit fraction comparison) and softer wording. I would send it to review; the observational core is solid enough to deserve referee time.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes the physical properties of 52 blazars previously proposed as candidate IceCube neutrino emitters (Buson et al. 2022a, 2023) using optical spectroscopy (much of it newly acquired), radio luminosities, and gamma-ray luminosities. The authors derive BLR luminosities, black hole masses, Eddington ratios, and jet-power proxies, then compare the sample with reference blazar samples (Sbarrato et al. 2012; Paliya et al. 2017, 2021; 5BZCat; 4LAC-DR3) using Anderson-Darling and Peto logrank tests, including simulations of censored-data effects. They conclude that the candidate sample is overall compatible with reference blazar populations but shows a mild tendency toward HERG-like, radiatively efficient accretion and high radio power, and they report three comparisons at ≳3σ (black hole mass vs. P17; redshift and radio power vs. S12).

Significance. If the central claim were robust, this would be a useful first physical characterization of candidate neutrino-emitting blazars and would support theoretical models favoring neutrino production in radiation-field-rich environments. The paper's strengths are the careful optical spectroscopic analysis, the public presentation of new spectra, and the explicit simulation-based warning about the fragility of censored-data tests. However, the 'preference for HERG-like objects' claim is not benchmarked against the parent 5BZCat catalog, and the one direct parent-catalog comparison (P1.4 GHz vs. BZCat, Table A.3) shows no difference. The paper's own acknowledgement that a non-negligible fraction of the 52 associations may be spurious (Sections 1 and 3.1) makes this missing control especially important. The MBH result also relies on a p-value correction in Appendix D that appears internally inconsistent. The central inference therefore needs additional work before it can be considered established.

major comments (4)

[Section 6.2, Table A.3] The central inference that the candidates 'prefer' HERG-like objects and powerful radio jets is based on absolute fractions above fixed thresholds (~63% above P1.4 GHz = 1e26 W/Hz and ~61% above LBLR/LEdd = 5e-4), with no control sample drawn from the parent 5BZCat catalog defining the expected fractions. The only direct parent-catalog comparison reported, P1.4 GHz vs. BZCat, gives a Peto logrank p-value of 0.233 (Table A.3), i.e., no evidence that the candidate sample differs from the very catalog from which it was selected. Given the paper's own statement that a non-negligible number of the 52 associations are expected to be spurious (Sections 1 and 3.1), the observed fractions should be compared against the 5BZCat expectation before any 'preference' claim is made.
[Section 6.2, Table A.3] The significant differences found for redshift and P1.4 GHz relative to the S12 sample cannot support a physical HERG-like preference, because the S12 sample is explicitly selected toward lower redshifts and lower radio powers (Section 3.2). A statistically significant difference against such a biased comparison sample only shows that the candidate sample is not like S12; it does not show that the sample is unusual relative to the blazar parent population. The authors should either construct a radio/redshift-matched control from 5BZCat or substantially soften the corresponding conclusion in Section 7.
[Section 6.2, Appendix D] The upper-limit correction used to retain the MBH vs. P17 result as ≳3σ is internally inconsistent. The text states that simulations with a censoring fraction closest to the observed case (38% ULs) 'conservatively result in a p-value of > 10^-2', and then divides the observed p = 1.70e-6 by 0.01 to obtain 1.70e-4. If censoring alone can produce null p-values above 10^-2, the conservative censoring-corrected p-value is at least of order 10^-2, not 1.7e-4. Under that reading the MBH comparison would not survive the Benjamini-Hochberg critical value at rank 3 (~2.8e-4), and the MBH ≳3σ claim should be removed or re-derived with a properly calibrated correction.
[Section 6.1] The Benjamini-Hochberg implementation uses an FDR level of Q = 0.003 for m = 32 tests. This is a nonstandard choice that effectively enforces a 3σ threshold for all discoveries, and the paper does not justify why this particular Q was selected. Because the 'post-trial' significance claims in Section 6.2 depend on this choice, the authors should either justify Q = 0.003 on a priori grounds or use a conventional FDR level and report the corresponding conclusions.

minor comments (4)

[Section 1] There is a typo in the introduction: 'hereafer Paper II' should read 'hereafter Paper II'.
[Section 6.2] The quoted fractions (~63% for P1.4 GHz and ~61% for LBLR/LEdd) are presented without explicitly stating whether upper limits are treated as detections or excluded; the later statement that ~87% of objects excluding upper limits occupy the HERG region shows that the definition matters and should be stated in the text.
[Appendix D, Figs. D.1-D.2] The simulation results are only summarized as 'p > 10^-2' in the text; reporting the actual p-value floors for the specific sample sizes and censoring patterns (e.g., for the MBH comparison with 32 measurements and 20 upper limits) would make the robustness assessment more quantitative and reproducible.
[Table A.1] The table is dense and several redshift entries rely on footnotes that are not all self-explanatory; a column with the redshift reference or an explicit 'this work' flag for newly measured values would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No construction-level circularity: the physical quantities are measured from new optical spectra and public catalogs; inherited sample self-citations and one same-group SED reference are not load-bearing for the central tendency claim.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that the 52 candidate neutrino-emitter blazars show a mild preference for HERG-like (radiatively efficient, radio-bright) properties. The quantities behind this claim (LBLR/LEdd, MBH, Lgamma/LEdd, P1.4GHz) are measured in Section 5.2 from optical spectra analyzed in this work (including 12 newly observed objects) and from public catalogs (5BZCat for P1.4GHz; 4LAC-DR3 for Lgamma), with thresholds taken from external literature (Ghisellini et al. 2011b; Best & Heckman 2012). The target sample is inherited from the authors' own previous cross-correlation papers (Buson et al. 2022a, 2023), but this is an external input defining the sample, not a quantity predicted by the present analysis; the HERG/radio classification is not defined in terms of the IceCube association. The one same-group modeling reference (Fichet de Clairfontaine et al. 2023) is used only to support the HERG nature of 5BZB J0630-2406, and the aggregate 61%/63% statistics do not depend on that single object. The paper explicitly acknowledges that a non-negligible fraction of the 52 associations may be spurious (Section 1, Section 3.1) and that individual associations cannot yet be confirmed (Section 7), appropriately qualifying the inference. The lack of a significant P1.4GHz difference from the parent BZCat sample (Peto logrank p=0.233, Table A.3) is a genuine statistical weakness of the 'preference' interpretation, but it is a correctness risk rather than a circularity: no equation or fitted parameter forces the claimed result. The statistical simulations of Appendix D are calibration checks, not hidden fits. Overall, the derivation is self-contained with respect to the physical characterization; the only self-citations are inherited sample definition and a supporting SED model, neither of which makes the conclusion equivalent to its inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Most inputs are empirical scaling laws from the AGN literature (virial BH masses, BLR line fractions, dust covering, radio-loudness thresholds) rather than parameters fitted in this paper. The paper's own hand-chosen settings enter through upper-limit procedures and uniform gamma-ray sensitivity. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)

Fixed FWHM for simulated undetected lines = 4000 km/s
Used to set upper limits on LBLR for 13 featureless spectra (Section 5.2); the choice directly affects whether sources fall above or below the LBLR/LEdd ~ 5e-4 HERG boundary.
Maximum simulated line flux = 1% of fitted continuum
Upper-limit procedure in Section 5.2 stops at 1% of continuum; more or less conservative thresholds would move sources relative to HERG/LERG boundaries.
Gamma-ray upper-limit sensitivity = F_gamma = 5e-10 ph cm^-2 s^-1, Gamma = 2.0
Applied to all 28 non-LAT-detected sources (Section 4.2); uniform sensitivity ignores source-dependent exposure and spectrum, and converted to L_gamma upper limits entering L_gamma/LEdd tests.
BLR covering factor = 0.1 (L_BLR = 0.1 L_disk)
Assumed in Section 5.2 to derive L_disk, r_BLR, r_DT from line luminosities; carries a factor-of-2 uncertainty and affects accretion-efficiency positions in Figures 2 and 3.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption The 52-candidate sample from Buson et al. (2022a, 2023) positionally cross-matches IceCube hotspots and is relevant for studying neutrino-emitting blazar properties.
Adopted from Papers I/II (Section 3.1); contamination by spurious associations is acknowledged, but population-level conclusions inherit this selection.
domain assumption AGN can be divided into radiatively efficient HERG-like and radiatively inefficient LERG-like accretion modes, traced by L_BLR/LEdd ~ 5e-4 and L_gamma/LEdd ~ 0.1.
Classification scheme in Section 2.2, taken from Ghisellini et al.; if the dichotomy is not clean, the HERG-like tendency becomes a proxy for line strength rather than neutrino-friendliness.
domain assumption BLR is virialized and virial BH mass scaling relations (Equation 5-6) hold for blazars.
Used to compute M_BH for BLR-line sources; the factor-of-4 systematic uncertainty is not propagated into statistical tests.
domain assumption Composite BLR line ratios of Francis et al. (1991) apply to individual blazars.
Equation (3) uses fixed relative fractions to convert one measured line to total L_BLR; strong variations between objects would shift accretion-regime classifications.
domain assumption Adopted flat LCDM cosmology (H0=69.6, Omega_m=0.29, Omega_Lambda=0.71) is correct.
Used in luminosity distance in Equation (1) and luminosity estimates; shifts of order 10% in H0 do not affect qualitative conclusions.
standard math Survival-analysis assumptions of independent and random censoring hold for the measured upper limits.
Kaplan-Meier, logrank and Peto logrank procedures in Section 6.1 and Appendix D assume censoring is unrelated to the true value; the paper itself shows sensitivity to censoring patterns.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The physical properties of candidate neutrino-emitter blazars." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ANDNBWQD

@misc{pith2026250703613,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The physical properties of candidate neutrino-emitter blazars},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ANDNBWQD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.03613}
}

abstract

The processes governing the production of astrophysical high-energy neutrinos are still debated, and the sources originating them remain an open question. Among the putative emitters, active galactic nuclei have gained increasing attention. Blazars, in particular, stand out due to their ability to accelerate particles in environments with external radiation fields. Recent observations suggest they may contribute to the neutrino flux detected by IceCube. We study the physical properties of a subsample of 52 blazars proposed as candidate neutrino emitters, based on a positional cross-correlation analysis between IceCube hotspots and the 5BZCat catalog. We aim to provide a first characterization of their central engines and physical nature, to explore the potential link with neutrino production. We analyze the optical spectroscopic properties of the 52 candidate neutrino-emitter blazars to infer their accretion regime. The study is complemented by radio and $\gamma$-ray data, which trace the intrinsic jet power. We compare the sample to other blazar populations in the literature, perform statistical tests, and explore, through simulations, the applicability of methods that include censored data. Overall, the target sample shows properties compatible with the reference samples. We observe a mild tendency to prefer objects with intense radiation fields, typical of radiatively efficient accretors, and high radio power. Among them, 24 are detected by Fermi-LAT, spanning various $\gamma$-ray luminosities. We also show that statistical tests commonly used in the literature need to be handled with caution, as they are sensitive to the number of censored data and the sample size.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.03613 by the authors.

**Figure 3.** Accretion regime LBLR/LEdd as a function of the radio power at 1.4 GHz, compared to the samples of (S12, P17, and P21 in the plot, Sbarrato et al. 2012; Paliya et al. 2017, 2021, see Section 3.2 for further details). For P17 we plot the subsample whose properties are analyzed through optical spectroscopy. The arrows indicate the upper limits on the optical luminosity. The three blue FSRQs (masquerading BL Lacs) TXS… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Distribution of the redshift, black hole mass, disk luminosity, size of the broad line region and dusty torus, and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

172 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages

[1]

, " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

ENTRY address archiveprefix author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution eprint journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all := #1 ...
[2]

write newline

" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in " " * FUNCTION format....
[3]

, " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...
[4]

write newline

" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...
[5]

write newline

" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTION or pop #1...
[6]

G., Abraham , K., Ackermann , M., et al

Aartsen , M. G., Abraham , K., Ackermann , M., et al. 2017 a , , 835, 45

2017
[7]

G., Abraham , K., Ackermann , M., et al

Aartsen , M. G., Abraham , K., Ackermann , M., et al. 2016, , 833, 3

2016
[8]

G., Abraham , K., Ackermann , M., et al

Aartsen , M. G., Abraham , K., Ackermann , M., et al. 2017 b , , 835, 151

2017

Show all 172 references

[9]

G., Ackermann , M., Adams , J., et al

Aartsen , M. G., Ackermann , M., Adams , J., et al. 2020, , 124, 051103

2020
[10]

2022, Science, 378, 538

Abbasi , R., Ackermann , M., Adams , J., et al. 2022, Science, 378, 538

2022
[11]

A., Ackermann , M., Ajello , M., et al

Abdo , A. A., Ackermann , M., Ajello , M., et al. 2010, , 715, 429

2010
[12]

A., Ackermann , M., Ajello , M., et al

Abdo , A. A., Ackermann , M., Ajello , M., et al. 2009, , 183, 46

2009
[13]

2022, , 259, 35

Abdurro'uf , Accetta , K., Aerts , C., et al. 2022, , 259, 35

2022
[14]

2015, , 218, 23

Acero , F., Ackermann , M., Ajello , M., et al. 2015, , 218, 23

2015
[15]

K., Ag \"u eros , M

Adelman-McCarthy , J. K., Ag \"u eros , M. A., Allam , S. S., et al. 2008, , 175, 297

2008
[16]

2020, , 249, 3

Ahumada , R., Allende Prieto , C., Almeida , A., et al. 2020, , 249, 3

2020
[17]

2022, , 263, 24

Ajello , M., Baldini , L., Ballet , J., et al. 2022, , 263, 24

2022
[18]

& Darling, D

Anderson, T. & Darling, D. 1952, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 23, 193

1952
[19]

2012, Astronomical and Astrophysical Transactions, 27, 557

Antonucci , R. 2012, Astronomical and Astrophysical Transactions, 27, 557

2012
[20]

1998, The Messenger, 94, 1

Appenzeller , I., Fricke , K., F \"u rtig , W., et al. 1998, The Messenger, 94, 1

1998
[21]

1980, , 238, 800

Avni , Y., Soltan , A., Tananbaum , H., & Zamorani , G. 1980, , 238, 800

1980
[22]

Azzollini, A., Buson, S., Fichet de Clairfontaine, G., et al. in prep
[23]

Azzollini et al. in prep
[24]

D., Laor , A., Behar , E., et al

Baldi , R. D., Laor , A., Behar , E., et al. 2022, , 510, 1043

2022
[25]

H., Digel , S

Ballet , J., Burnett , T. H., Digel , S. W., & Lott , B. 2020, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2005.11208

2020 arXiv
[26]

F., et al

Barbano, E., Buson, S., de Clairfontaine, G. F., et al. 2023, PoS, ICRC2023, 1540

2023
[27]

2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2309.03115

Bellenghi , C., Padovani , P., Resconi , E., & Giommi , P. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2309.03115

2023 arXiv
[28]

& Hochberg, Y

Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. 1995, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 57, 289

1995
[29]

Best , P. N. & Heckman , T. M. 2012, , 421, 1569

2012
[30]

Blandford , R. D. & Payne , D. G. 1982, , 199, 883

1982
[31]

Blandford , R. D. & Znajek , R. L. 1977, , 179, 433

1977
[32]

1952, , 112, 195

Bondi , H. 1952, , 112, 195

1952
[33]

2013, , 768, 54

B \"o ttcher , M., Reimer , A., Sweeney , K., & Prakash , A. 2013, , 768, 54

2013
[34]

2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2305.11263

Buson , S., Tramacere , A., Oswald , L., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2305.11263

2023 arXiv
[35]

2022 a , , 933, L43

Buson , S., Tramacere , A., Pfeiffer , L., et al. 2022 a , , 933, L43

2022
[36]

2022 b , , 934, L38

Buson , S., Tramacere , A., Pfeiffer , L., et al. 2022 b , , 934, L38

2022
[37]

& Jiang, D

Cao, X. & Jiang, D. R. 1999, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 307, 802

1999
[38]

Carnall , A. C. 2017, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1705.05165

2017 arXiv
[39]

1997, , 286, 415

Celotti , A., Padovani , P., & Ghisellini , G. 1997, , 286, 415

1997
[40]

2003, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

Cepa , J., Aguiar-Gonzalez , M., Bland-Hawthorn , J., et al. 2003, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 4841, Instrument Design and Performance for Optical/Infrared Ground-based Telescopes, ed. M. Iye & A. F. M. Moorwood , 1739--1749

2003
[41]

2020, Galaxies, 8

Cerruti, M. 2020, Galaxies, 8

2020
[42]

2021, , 913, 93

Chen , Y., Gu , Q., Fan , J., et al. 2021, , 913, 93

2021
[43]

J., Cotton , W

Condon , J. J., Cotton , W. D., Greisen , E. W., et al. 1998, , 115, 1693

1998
[44]

M., Smith , R

Croom , S. M., Smith , R. J., Boyle , B. J., et al. 2004, , 349, 1397

2004
[45]

2011, , 413, 39

Decarli , R., Dotti , M., & Treves , A. 2011, , 413, 39

2011
[46]

2008, , 387, 1237

Decarli , R., Labita , M., Treves , A., & Falomo , R. 2008, , 387, 1237

2008
[47]

Deconto-Machado , A., del Olmo Orozco , A., Marziani , P., Perea , J., & Stirpe , G. M. 2023, , 669, A83

2023
[48]

D., Murase , K., & Inoue , Y

Dermer , C. D., Murase , K., & Inoue , Y. 2014, Journal of High Energy Astrophysics, 3, 29

2014
[49]

J., Webster , R

Drinkwater , M. J., Webster , R. L., Francis , P. J., et al. 1997, , 284, 85

1997
[50]

M., Bai , J

Du , L. M., Bai , J. M., & Xie , Z. H. 2013, , 18, 1

2013
[51]

2017, , 469, 1065

Dwelly , T., Salvato , M., Merloni , A., et al. 2017, , 469, 1065

2017
[52]

Eddington, A. S. 1926, The internal constitution of the stars (Cambridge University Press)

1926
[53]

H., Yang , J

Fan , J. H., Yang , J. H., Liu , Y., et al. 2016, , 226, 20

2016
[54]

Feigelson , E. D. & Nelson , P. I. 1985, , 293, 192

1985
[55]

2023, , 958, L2

Fichet de Clairfontaine , G., Buson , S., Pfeiffer , L., et al. 2023, , 958, L2

2023
[56]

U., Hasinger , G., Schwope , A

Fischer , J. U., Hasinger , G., Schwope , A. D., et al. 1998, Astronomische Nachrichten, 319, 347

1998
[57]

1998, , 299, 433

Fossati , G., Maraschi , L., Celotti , A., Comastri , A., & Ghisellini , G. 1998, , 299, 433

1998
[58]

J., Hewett , P

Francis , P. J., Hewett , P. C., Foltz , C. B., et al. 1991, , 373, 465

1991
[59]

M., et al

Freudling , W., Romaniello , M., Bramich , D. M., et al. 2013, , 559, A96

2013
[60]

& Celotti , A

Ghisellini , G. & Celotti , A. 2001, , 379, L1

2001
[61]

2009, , 396, L105

Ghisellini , G., Maraschi , L., & Tavecchio , F. 2009, , 396, L105

2009
[62]

2017, , 469, 255

Ghisellini , G., Righi , C., Costamante , L., & Tavecchio , F. 2017, , 469, 255

2017
[63]

2011 a , , 411, 901

Ghisellini , G., Tagliaferri , G., Foschini , L., et al. 2011 a , , 411, 901

2011
[64]

& Tavecchio , F

Ghisellini , G. & Tavecchio , F. 2008, , 387, 1669

2008
[65]

2011 b , , 414, 2674

Ghisellini , G., Tavecchio , F., Foschini , L., & Ghirlanda , G. 2011 b , , 414, 2674

2011
[66]

2010, , 402, 497

Ghisellini , G., Tavecchio , F., Foschini , L., et al. 2010, , 402, 497

2010
[67]

2012, , 425, 1371

Ghisellini , G., Tavecchio , F., Foschini , L., et al. 2012, , 425, 1371

2012
[68]

2014, , 515, 376

Ghisellini , G., Tavecchio , F., Maraschi , L., Celotti , A., & Sbarrato , T. 2014, , 515, 376

2014
[69]

2016, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

Gimeno , G., Roth , K., Chiboucas , K., et al. 2016, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9908, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VI, ed. C. J. Evans , L. Simard , & H. Takami , 99082S

2016
[70]

2013, , 431, 1914

Giommi , P., Padovani , P., & Polenta , G. 2013, , 431, 1914

2013
[71]

2012, , 420, 2899

Giommi , P., Padovani , P., Polenta , G., et al. 2012, , 420, 2899

2012
[72]

Graham , A. W. 2007, , 379, 711

2007
[73]

E., Romani , R

Healey , S. E., Romani , R. W., Cotter , G., et al. 2008, , 175, 97

2008
[74]

E., Romani , R

Healey , S. E., Romani , R. W., Taylor , G. B., et al. 2007, , 171, 61

2007
[75]

Heckman , T. M. & Best , P. N. 2014, , 52, 589

2014
[76]

Hewett , P. C. & Wild , V. 2010, , 405, 2302

2010
[77]

C., Cohen, M

Homan, D. C., Cohen, M. H., Hovatta, T., et al. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal, 923, 67

2021
[78]

2021, , 650, A83

Hovatta , T., Lindfors , E., Kiehlmann , S., et al. 2021, , 650, A83

2021
[79]

2013, Science , 342, 1242856

IceCube Collaboration . 2013, Science , 342, 1242856

2013
[80]

G., Ackermann , M., et al

IceCube Collaboration , Aartsen , M. G., Ackermann , M., et al. 2018, Science, 361, eaat1378

2018
[81]

J., Tadhunter , C

Inskip , K. J., Tadhunter , C. N., Morganti , R., et al. 2010, , 407, 1739

2010
[82]

D., & Nelson , P

Isobe , T., Feigelson , E. D., & Nelson , P. I. 1986, , 306, 490

1986
[83]

H., Read , M

Jones , D. H., Read , M. A., Saunders , W., et al. 2009, , 399, 683

2009
[84]

H., Saunders , W., Colless , M., et al

Jones , D. H., Saunders , W., Colless , M., et al. 2004, , 355, 747

2004
[85]

J., Bonfield , D

Kalfountzou , E., Jarvis , M. J., Bonfield , D. G., & Hardcastle , M. J. 2012, , 427, 2401

2012
[86]

2015, , 576, A78

Kausch , W., Noll , S., Smette , A., et al. 2015, , 576, A78

2015
[87]

2017, , 850, 74

Koss , M., Trakhtenbrot , B., Ricci , C., et al. 2017, , 850, 74

2017
[88]

M., Lindfors , E., Hovatta , T., et al

Kouch , P. M., Lindfors , E., Hovatta , T., et al. 2024, , 690, A111

2024
[89]

Y., Plavin , A

Kovalev , Y. Y., Plavin , A. V., Pushkarev , A. B., & Troitsky , S. V. 2023, Galaxies, 11, 84

2023
[90]

2018, , 620, A174

Krau , F., Deoskar , K., Baxter , C., et al. 2018, , 620, A174

2018
[91]

2022, , 934, 180

Kun , E., Bartos , I., Becker Tjus , J., et al. 2022, , 934, 180

2022
[92]

Labrie , K., Anderson , K., C \'a rdenes , R., Simpson , C., & Turner , J. E. H. 2019, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 523, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXVII, ed. P. J. Teuben , M. W. Pound , B. A. Thomas , & E. M. Warner , 321

2019
[93]

S., et al

Lainez , M., Dominguez , A., Paliya , V. S., et al. 2024, in 38th International Cosmic Ray Conference, 558

2024
[94]

2020, , 250, 37

Landoni , M., Falomo , R., Paiano , S., & Treves , A. 2020, , 250, 37

2020
[95]

1974, Astrophysical Formulae: Volume I & Volume II: Radiation, Gas Processes and High Energy Astrophysics/Space, Time, Matter and Cosmology (Springer Science & Business Media)

Lang, K. 1974, Astrophysical Formulae: Volume I & Volume II: Radiation, Gas Processes and High Energy Astrophysics/Space, Time, Matter and Cosmology (Springer Science & Business Media)

1974
[96]

1992, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

Lavalley , M., Isobe , T., & Feigelson , E. 1992, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 25, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems I, ed. D. M. Worrall , C. Biemesderfer , & J. Barnes , 245

1992
[97]

H., et al

Le \'o n-Tavares , J., Valtaoja , E., Chavushyan , V. H., et al. 2011, , 411, 1127

2011
[98]

Lincetto et al. in prep
[99]

Longair , M. S. 1994, High energy astrophysics. Vol.2: Stars, the galaxy and the interstellar medium , Vol. 2 (Cambridge University Press)

1994
[100]

1993, , 269, 67

Mannheim , K. 1993, , 269, 67

1993
[101]

& Tavecchio , F

Maraschi , L. & Tavecchio , F. 2003, , 593, 667

2003
[102]

2014, Multifrequency Catalogue of Blazars - 5th Edition

Massaro , E., Maselli , A., Leto , C., et al. 2014, Multifrequency Catalogue of Blazars - 5th Edition

2014
[103]

E., & Smith , H

Massaro , F., D'Abrusco , R., Ajello , M., Grindlay , J. E., & Smith , H. A. 2011, , 740, L48

2011
[104]

2015, , 575, A124

Massaro , F., Landoni , M., D'Abrusco , R., et al. 2015, , 575, A124

2015
[105]

McLure , R. J. & Dunlop , J. S. 2004, in Multiwavelength AGN Surveys, ed. R. M \'u jica & R. Maiolino , 389--392

2004
[106]

J., Croston , J

Mingo , B., Hardcastle , M. J., Croston , J. H., et al. 2014, , 440, 269

2014
[107]

L., Stocke , J

Morris , S. L., Stocke , J. T., Gioia , I. M., et al. 1991, , 380, 49

1991
[108]

J., Engel , R., Rachen , J

M \"u cke , A., Protheroe , R. J., Engel , R., Rachen , J. P., & Stanev , T. 2003, Astroparticle Physics, 18, 593

2003
[109]

G., Bond , T., Crampton , D., et al

Murowinski , R. G., Bond , T., Crampton , D., et al. 1998, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 3355, Optical Astronomical Instrumentation, ed. S. D'Odorico , 188--195

1998
[110]

L., Abdo , A

Nolan , P. L., Abdo , A. A., Ackermann , M., et al. 2012, , 199, 31

2012
[111]

S., Porter , A

Osmer , P. S., Porter , A. C., & Green , R. F. 1994, , 436, 678

1994
[112]

Osterbrock , D. E. & Ferland, G. J. 2006, Astrophysics Of Gas Nebulae and Active Galactic Nuclei (University science books)

2006
[113]

1992, , 257, 404

Padovani , P. 1992, , 257, 404

1992
[114]

2022 a , , 511, 4697

Padovani , P., Boccardi , B., Falomo , R., & Giommi , P. 2022 a , , 511, 4697

2022
[115]

2022 b , , 510, 2671

Padovani , P., Giommi , P., Falomo , R., et al. 2022 b , , 510, 2671

2022
[116]

2012, , 422, L48

Padovani , P., Giommi , P., & Rau , A. 2012, , 422, L48

2012
[117]

2019, , 484, L104

Padovani , P., Oikonomou , F., Petropoulou , M., Giommi , P., & Resconi , E. 2019, , 484, L104

2019
[118]

Padovani , P., Resconi , E., Giommi , P., Arsioli , B., & Chang , Y. L. 2016, , 457, 3582

2016
[119]

2023, , 521, 2270

Paiano , S., Falomo , R., Treves , A., et al. 2023, , 521, 2270

2023
[120]

2018, , 854, L32

Paiano , S., Falomo , R., Treves , A., & Scarpa , R. 2018, , 854, L32

2018
[121]

2020, , 497, 94

Paiano , S., Falomo , R., Treves , A., & Scarpa , R. 2020, , 497, 94

2020
[122]

2017, , 837, 144

Paiano , S., Landoni , M., Falomo , R., et al. 2017, , 837, 144

2017
[123]

S., Dom \' nguez , A., Ajello , M., Olmo-Garc \' a , A., & Hartmann , D

Paliya , V. S., Dom \' nguez , A., Ajello , M., Olmo-Garc \' a , A., & Hartmann , D. 2021, , 253, 46

2021
[124]

S., Marcotulli , L., Ajello , M., et al

Paliya , V. S., Marcotulli , L., Ajello , M., et al. 2017, , 851, 33

2017
[125]

& Trippe , S

Park , J. & Trippe , S. 2017, , 834, 157

2017
[126]

A., Massaro , F., Gu , M., et al

Pe \ n a-Herazo , H. A., Massaro , F., Gu , M., et al. 2021, , 161, 196

2021
[127]

2022, Master thesis, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg

Pfeiffer, L. 2022, Master thesis, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg

2022
[128]

2024, Master thesis, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg

Pfeiffer, L. 2024, Master thesis, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg

2024
[129]

& Krommidas , P

Pfleiderer , J. & Krommidas , P. 1982, , 198, 281

1982
[130]

2007, , 470, 787

Piranomonte , S., Perri , M., Giommi , P., Landt , H., & Padovani , P. 2007, , 470, 787

2007
[131]

Y., Kovalev , Y

Plavin , A., Kovalev , Y. Y., Kovalev , Y. A., & Troitsky , S. 2020, , 894, 101

2020
[132]

V., Kovalev , Y

Plavin , A. V., Kovalev , Y. Y., Kovalev , Y. A., & Troitsky , S. V. 2021, , 908, 157

2021
[133]

V., Kovalev , Y

Plavin , A. V., Kovalev , Y. Y., Kovalev , Y. A., & Troitsky , S. V. 2023, , 523, 1799

2023
[134]

M., Markoff , S., Trager , S

Plotkin , R. M., Markoff , S., Trager , S. C., & Anderson , S. F. 2011, , 413, 805

2011
[135]

2020, The Journal of Open Source Software, 5, 2308

Prochaska , J., Hennawi , J., Westfall , K., et al. 2020, The Journal of Open Source Software, 5, 2308

2020
[136]

& Zhang , S

Punsly , B. & Zhang , S. 2011, , 412, L123

2011
[137]

S., Tadhunter , C

Ramos Almeida , C., Bessiere , P. S., Tadhunter , C. N., et al. 2013, , 436, 997

2013
[138]

A., Stocke , J

Rector , T. A., Stocke , J. T., Perlman , E. S., Morris , S. L., & Gioia , I. M. 2000, , 120, 1626

2000
[139]

J., Rebassa-Mansergas , A., Luo , A

Ren , J. J., Rebassa-Mansergas , A., Luo , A. L., et al. 2014, , 570, A107

2014
[140]

J., Anderson , S

Ruan , J. J., Anderson , S. F., Plotkin , R. M., et al. 2014, , 797, 19

2014
[141]

M., Buson , S., Marchesi , S., et al

Sanchez Zaballa , J. M., Buson , S., Marchesi , S., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.03457

2025 arXiv
[142]

2020, , 644, A54

Santoro , F., Tadhunter , C., Baron , D., Morganti , R., & Holt , J. 2020, , 644, A54

2020
[143]

2012, , 421, 1764

Sbarrato , T., Ghisellini , G., Maraschi , L., & Colpi , M. 2012, , 421, 1764

2012
[144]

2014, , 445, 81

Sbarrato , T., Padovani , P., & Ghisellini , G. 2014, , 445, 81

2014
[145]

2009, , 137, 337

Sbarufatti , B., Ciprini , S., Kotilainen , J., et al. 2009, , 137, 337

2009
[146]

Shakura , N. I. & Sunyaev , R. A. 1973, , 24, 337

1973
[147]

S., Romani , R

Shaw , M. S., Romani , R. W., Cotter , G., et al. 2012, , 748, 49

2012
[148]

S., Romani , R

Shaw , M. S., Romani , R. W., Cotter , G., et al. 2013, , 764, 135

2013
[149]

& Liu , X

Shen , Y. & Liu , X. 2012, , 753, 125

2012
[150]

T., Strauss , M

Shen , Y., Richards , G. T., Strauss , M. A., et al. 2011, , 194, 45

2011
[151]

2015, , 576, A77

Smette , A., Sana , H., Noll , S., et al. 2015, , 576, A77

2015
[152]

J., Boyle , B

Smith , R. J., Boyle , B. J., Shanks , T., et al. 1998, in New Horizons from Multi-Wavelength Sky Surveys, ed. B. J. McLean , D. A. Golombek , J. J. E. Hayes , & H. E. Payne , Vol. 179, 348

1998
[153]

L., Comte , G., et al

Song , Y.-H., Luo , A. L., Comte , G., et al. 2012, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 12, 453

2012
[154]

I., Petropoulou , M., Giommi , P., et al

Stathopoulos , S. I., Petropoulou , M., Giommi , P., et al. 2022, , 510, 4063

2022
[155]

M., Johnston , H

Titov , O., Stanford , L. M., Johnston , H. M., et al. 2013, , 146, 10

2013
[156]

1986, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

Tody , D. 1986, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 627, Instrumentation in astronomy VI, ed. D. L. Crawford , 733

1986
[157]

1993, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

Tody , D. 1993, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 52, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems II, ed. R. J. Hanisch , R. J. V. Brissenden , & J. Barnes , 173

1993
[158]

2012, , 48, 9

Torrealba , J., Chavushyan , V., Cruz-Gonz \'a lez , I., et al. 2012, , 48, 9

2012
[159]

Truebenbach , A. E. & Darling , J. 2017, , 233, 3

2017
[160]

2004, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

Urry , C. 2004, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 311, AGN Physics with the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, ed. G. T. Richards & P. B. Hall , 49

2004
[161]

Urry , C. M. & Padovani , P. 1995, , 107, 803

1995
[162]

C., Ogle , P

Vermeulen , R. C., Ogle , P. M., Tran , H. D., et al. 1995, , 452, L5

1995
[163]

2011, , 536, A105

Vernet , J., Dekker , H., D'Odorico , S., et al. 2011, , 536, A105

2011
[164]

& Osmer , P

Vestergaard , M. & Osmer , P. S. 2009, , 699, 800

2009
[165]

& Peterson , B

Vestergaard , M. & Peterson , B. M. 2006, , 641, 689

2006
[166]

Wang , J.-M., Staubert , R., & Ho , L. C. 2002, , 579, 554

2002
[167]

L., Becker , R

White , R. L., Becker , R. H., Helfand , D. J., & Gregg , M. D. 1997, , 475, 479

1997
[168]

2022, , 936, 146

Xiao , H., Fan , J., Ouyang , Z., et al. 2022, , 936, 146

2022
[169]

Xie , Z. H. & Li , Z. 2012, , 64, 33

2012
[170]

2015, , 450, 3568

Xiong , D., Zhang , X., Bai , J., & Zhang , H. 2015, , 450, 3568

2015
[171]

2012, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1206.3569

Zhao , G., Zhao , Y., Chu , Y., Jing , Y., & Deng , L. 2012, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1206.3569

2012 arXiv
[172]

2021, , 103, 123018

Zhou , B., Kamionkowski , M., & Liang , Y.-f. 2021, , 103, 123018

2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

, " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

ENTRY address archiveprefix author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution eprint journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all := #1 ...

[2] [2]

write newline

" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in " " * FUNCTION format....

[3] [3]

, " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

[4] [4]

write newline

" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

[5] [5]

write newline

" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTION or pop #1...

[6] [6]

G., Abraham , K., Ackermann , M., et al

Aartsen , M. G., Abraham , K., Ackermann , M., et al. 2017 a , , 835, 45

2017

[7] [7]

G., Abraham , K., Ackermann , M., et al

Aartsen , M. G., Abraham , K., Ackermann , M., et al. 2016, , 833, 3

2016

[8] [8]

G., Abraham , K., Ackermann , M., et al

Aartsen , M. G., Abraham , K., Ackermann , M., et al. 2017 b , , 835, 151

2017