Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 53 references

Subgiants in NGC 188 Reveal that Rotationally Induced Mixing Creates the Main Sequence Li-Dip

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that shear-induced mixing from stellar angular momentum loss is the unique mechanism creating the main-sequence lithium dip, and that the shallower lithium–temperature slope of NGC 188 subgiants compared with M67…

desk verdict New NGC 188 Li data are genuinely useful, but the 'unique mechanism' claim outruns a qualitative slope comparison that leaves other mechanisms untested. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.04266 v2 pith:IDFHBYRR submitted 2025-07-06 astro-ph.SR

Qinghui Sun , Constantine P. Deliyannis , Barbara J. Anthony-Twarog , Bruce A. Twarog , Aaron Steinhauer , Jeremy R. King This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SR
keywords lithiumdiprotationalmixingshearinstabilityNGC188M67subgiantdredge-upabundanceopenclusters
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the long-unexplained lithium dip in mid-F dwarfs is caused by one mechanism alone: mixing driven by shear instabilities that arise when stars lose angular momentum and spin down. Because each proposed mechanism imprints a different shape on the subsurface lithium profile, the authors use subgiants in the old cluster NGC 188 as a probe: as these stars cool and their surface convection zones deepen, they dredge up the fossil lithium profile left over from the main sequence. The observed lithium–temperature relation is substantially shallower than in the younger cluster M67, which the authors argue matches rotational mixing and rules out mass loss and diffusion. If correct, this identifies the physical cause of a 40-year-old anomaly using lithium data alone, without the difficult beryllium and boron observations that previously carried the argument.

What carries the argument

The central object is the subsurface lithium preservation region and its depth-dependent abundance profile, which each proposed mechanism shapes differently. The paper uses subgiants as a natural probe: as a subgiant's surface convection zone deepens with decreasing effective temperature, it successively mixes and reveals this stored profile, converting the profile's shape into an observable lithium-versus-temperature relation. The discriminating comparison is between NGC 188 and M67, two open clusters whose subgiants emerged from slightly different parts of the lithium dip and whose predicted rotational-mixing slopes differ because of the small stellar mass difference.

What would settle it

A concrete test would be a higher-resolution, larger-sample lithium survey of NGC 188 subgiants: if the lithium abundance rises with decreasing effective temperature below the turnoff, the diffusion prediction wins; if it declines much more steeply than the rotational-mixing track, mass loss wins. Either outcome would falsify the paper's central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the lithium abundance pattern along the NGC 188 subgiant branch is the fossil signature of rotationally induced mixing in the main-sequence progenitors. Each proposed lithium-dip mechanism — mass loss, diffusion, gravity-wave mixing, and rotational mixing — predicts a different subsurface lithium profile, and subgiants dredge up that profile as they evolve. The paper shows that NGC 188 subgiants exhibit a lithium–temperature slope that is shallower than M67's and that continues to flatten toward lower temperatures. A steep decline would indicate mass loss; an initial rise would indicate diffusive pileup; the observed shallow, decreasing slope is the rotational-mixing signature. Because NGC 188 is slightly older and less massive than M67, rotational models predict exactly this shallower slope, giving a quantitative, mechanism-specific match. The authors therefore conclude that shear mixing driven by angular momentum loss is the unique mechanism creating the lithium dip, and they extend this to suggest that rotational mixing may dominate lithium depletion across a wide range of solar-type stars, including the Sun.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that the subsurface lithium profile set during the main sequence remains unchanged until the deepening convection zone of a subgiant dredges it up, so that any additional mixing on the subgiant branch would reshape the profile and could mimic or mask the predicted slopes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Lithium observations of subgiants alone can discriminate between the proposed lithium-dip mechanisms, removing the need for the extremely difficult beryllium and boron measurements used in prior work.
  • If rotational mixing is the unique mechanism, the lithium–temperature slope of subgiants should become systematically shallower in older, lower-mass clusters that sample cooler parts of the dip.
  • Rotational mixing may be the dominant mechanism depleting lithium in a broad range of solar-type stars, potentially explaining the solar lithium discrepancy.
  • A modest lithium depletion of about a factor of three in metal-poor dwarfs could reconcile the observed Spite-plateau level with the primordial lithium abundance predicted by Big Bang nucleosynthesis.
  • The subgiant dredge-up technique offers a feasible observational route to probing interior mixing mechanisms in a wide variety of clusters without requiring space-based ultraviolet observations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Going beyond the paper, a direct test would be to measure rotation rates of NGC 188 turnoff stars: if rotational mixing is the cause, the lithium dip depth should correlate with the angular momentum history encoded in present-day rotation.
  • The paper's preservation assumption could be tested by combining lithium with beryllium in the same NGC 188 subgiants; a mismatch with rotational-model predictions would signal that post-main-sequence processes, such as thermohaline instability, reshape the profile before dredge-up.
  • The same dredge-up diagnostic could be applied to clusters spanning a range of ages and metallicities to map how angular momentum loss and mixing efficiency vary with stellar mass, turning a one-cluster test into a general probe of interior stellar physics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents new lithium (Li) abundances for 96 turnoff and subgiant members of the old open cluster NGC 188, obtained with the WIYN/Hydra spectrograph, and compares their A(Li) versus Teff distribution with subgiants in M67. The authors argue that the Li-Teff relation for NGC 188 subgiants is substantially shallower than in M67 and decreases toward lower Teff, which they interpret as consistent with the subsurface Li profile predicted by Yale rotational-mixing models and inconsistent with mass loss and diffusion. On this basis, they claim that rotationally induced mixing is the unique mechanism creating the main-sequence Li-Dip. The paper also discusses implications for the Spite plateau and Big Bang nucleosynthesis, and emphasizes that Li alone, without Be or B observations, can discriminate among proposed mechanisms if subgiant dredge-up reveals the main-sequence Li profile.

Significance. If the central claim is established, this would be an important result: it would provide a Li-only diagnostic for the mechanism of the Li-Dip, avoiding the expensive Be and B observations that have previously been needed, and it would strengthen the case that rotational mixing is the dominant Li-depletion process in mid-F stars and possibly in solar-type stars generally. The new NGC 188 data are a valuable addition, and the analysis pipeline (membership, multiplicity, synthetic-spectrum Li abundances, recalibration of M67 data) is careful and described in enough detail to be reproduced. However, the paper's headline claim of a 'unique mechanism' currently exceeds what the presented analysis demonstrates: the slope comparison is entirely qualitative, and several proposed mechanisms (gravity waves, magnetic fields) are not tested at all. The core idea is promising and the data are plausibly consistent with rotational mixing, but the quantitative and model-comparison work needed to support uniqueness is missing.

major comments (4)
  1. [The Li preservation region is a key discriminator; Figure 2] The central inference rests on the claim that the NGC 188 Li-Teff relation is 'substantially shallower' than in M67, but no numerical slopes, uncertainties, or model curves are presented. The comparison in Figure 2 is visual only, and several of the NGC 188 subgiant measurements are upper limits, which require censored-data methods. Please provide a quantitative analysis: fit a censored regression (or equivalent) to A(Li) versus Teff for both clusters, report the slopes with uncertainties, and overlay the Yale rotational-mixing, mass-loss, and diffusion model predictions. Without this, the abstract's statement that rotation is the unique mechanism is not supported by the data as analyzed.
  2. [Abstract and concluding paragraph] The claim that rotation is the 'unique mechanism' driving Li depletion is not supported by the analysis as written, because the comparison only tests three mechanisms (rotation, mass loss, diffusion). Gravity-wave and magnetic-field scenarios, which are listed in the introduction as proposed mechanisms, are not considered in the subgiant comparison. The paper should either provide predicted Li-Teff slopes for those scenarios and test them against the NGC 188 data, or revise the conclusion to state that the data are consistent with rotational mixing and argue against mass loss and diffusion, rather than claiming uniqueness among all proposed mechanisms.
  3. [Abstract; 'Subgiants evolving out of the Li-Dip' paragraph] The diagnostic assumes that the main-sequence subsurface Li profile is preserved unchanged until the deepening surface convection zone of a subgiant dredges it up. However, post-main-sequence mixing processes—such as thermohaline instability (cited as [36]) or subgiant-phase rotational mixing—could reshape the Li profile and either mimic or mask the predicted slopes. The manuscript does not justify this assumption quantitatively. Please provide model-based evidence that the dredge-up timescale is short compared with any post-main-sequence mixing timescale in the relevant Teff range, or discuss how such mixing would alter the predicted slopes and the comparison to M67.
  4. [The Li preservation region; 'NGC 188 is slightly older' paragraph] The predicted slopes are taken from Yale rotational models, which contain free parameters (shear-mixing efficiency, angular momentum loss, initial rotation rate). No model calculations are shown for NGC 188 specifically in this paper, so it is unclear whether the predicted shallow slope is robust to plausible parameter choices or whether the slope difference between M67 and NGC 188 could be produced by parameter variation rather than by the mass difference. Please present the model predictions as curves or otherwise quantify the parameter dependence, so that the reader can see that the comparison actually discriminates among mechanisms.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Methods; Extended Table 1] The text says that the final A(Li) detections and upper limits for NGC 188 are in Extended Table 1, but the displayed Extended Table 1 is labeled 'M67 A(Li) data'; please clarify which table contains the new NGC 188 measurements.
  2. [Author affiliations] Affiliation 4 reads 'State University of New York, Geneso'; this appears to be a typo for 'Geneseo.'
  3. [Figure 2 caption] The legend entries 'SM?' and 'BM?' are unexplained in the caption; please spell out 'single likely member' and 'binary likely member' or define these abbreviations in the text before they are used.
  4. [Figure 2] The figure shows no error bars on either Teff or A(Li) for the detections; adding representative error bars (or reporting them in the table) would make the visual comparison more transparent.
  5. [Final paragraph; Abstract] The connections to the Spite plateau and Big Bang nucleosynthesis are intriguing but presented without quantitative support; consider softening these statements or moving them to a clearly labeled speculative discussion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: NGC 188 Li data are new and independent; model comparisons are to published benchmarks, not to fits of the present data.

full rationale

The derivation chain treats the NGC 188 subgiant Li abundances as new observations and compares them with published M67 Li data [35] and with qualitative predictions of rotational mixing from published Yale models [21]. No model parameter is fitted to the NGC 188 data in this paper; the paper does not compute a predicted slope from the new data and then claim it as a prediction. The 'shallower than M67' signature is cited to [21] and [35], which are prior empirical/model results (with author overlap through C.P. Deliyannis), but they are externally testable benchmarks, not inputs derived from the NGC 188 measurements. Thus the central comparison is not equivalent to its inputs by construction. The main weakness is that the 'unique mechanism' conclusion rests on a largely visual, non-quantitative slope comparison and on the assumption that the main-sequence Li profile is preserved until subgiant dredge-up; this is an evidentiary/robustness concern, not a circularity. The BBN/plateau discussion is speculative and clearly labeled as such. Under the review rules, self-citation alone is not circularity when the cited results are independent empirical/model constraints, as they are here; therefore the appropriate score is low (2).

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's quantitative predictions come from Yale rotational mixing models developed in prior work by the same group; the model's mixing efficiency and initial rotation/spin-down parameters are free in that theory and are adopted here without re-fitting. The dredge-up interpretation also assumes no modification of the Li profile during subgiant evolution, and the cross-cluster comparison assumes consistent Teff and abundance scales.

free parameters (2)
  • Shear mixing efficiency in Yale rotational models = not specified in this paper (inherited from Deliyannis & Pinsonneault 1997 and Somers & Pinsonneault 2015)
    The predicted slope of the Li-Teff relation for NGC 188 subgiants depends on the efficiency of rotationally induced mixing, which is not re-derived here.
  • Angular momentum loss and initial rotation rate = not specified in this paper
    The amount of spin-down and thus the strength of shear-driven mixing in the models depends on the initial stellar rotation and the angular momentum loss law, both adopted from prior Yale model publications.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Standard stellar evolution theory and Y^2 isochrones provide the Teff, luminosity, and dredge-up timing for NGC 188 and M67.
    The adopted 6.3 Gyr Y^2 isochrone with [Fe/H] = +0.064 sets the Teff scale and the subgiant evolution timescales; this is standard input but not independently verified in this paper.
  • domain assumption Subgiant dredge-up preserves the main-sequence Li profile without additional mixing.
    The entire method assumes the Li profile in the Li-preservation region is set on the main sequence and is only exposed, not modified, by the deepening convection zone. Stated in the abstract and main text; not tested.
  • domain assumption The Teff and A(Li) scales for M67 and NGC 188 are on a consistent system.
    The comparison of slopes assumes no systematic Teff offsets between clusters; the authors recalibrated M67 data but residual offsets could alter the inferred slope difference.
  • domain assumption Yale rotational mixing models (Deliyannis & Pinsonneault 1997; Sills & Deliyannis 2000) correctly predict the Li-Teff relation of subgiants emerging from the Li-Dip.
    The interpretation relies on model predictions made in prior papers by the same group; no new model computations are presented here.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Subgiants in NGC 188 Reveal that Rotationally Induced Mixing Creates the Main Sequence Li-Dip." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IDFHBYRR

@misc{pith2026250704266,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Subgiants in NGC 188 Reveal that Rotationally Induced Mixing Creates the Main Sequence Li-Dip},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IDFHBYRR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.04266}
}
read the original abstract

The "Li-Dip" is an unexpected, striking, and highly non-standard anomaly of severe lithium depletion observed in mid-F dwarf stars, which has puzzled astronomers for nearly 40 years. Mechanisms proposed to explain the Li-Dip include effects related to rotation, magnetic fields, diffusion, gravity waves, and mass loss. The critical question became, which, if any, might be realistic? Here we show that mixing due to shear induced by stellar angular momentum loss is the unique mechanism driving the Li depletion. Each mechanism leaves a different signature in the subsurface Li distribution. The deepening surface convection zones of subgiants of NGC 188 evolving out of the Li-Dip dredge up the sub-surface material and thus reveal the signature of the responsible mechanism, rotation. Beryllium and boron data have also favored rotational mixing; however, these elements can be extremely difficult or impossible to observe. Our highly complementary approach provides fresh and very feasible perspectives on using Li to probe poorly understood physical mechanisms acting below the stellar surface, thereby improving fundamental understanding of stellar evolution. Rotational mixing may be the dominant mechanism that depletes Li in a wide range of Solar-type stars, including in the Sun. Possible connections to Big Bang Nucleosynthesis are discussed.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

  1. [36]

    Charbonnel, C., Lagarde, N.: Thermohaline instability and rotation-induced mix- ing. I. Low- and intermediate-mass solar metallicity stars up to the end of the AGB. Astronomy and Astrophysics 522, 10 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1051/ 0004-6361/201014432 arXiv:1006.5359 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2010

  2. [1]

    Icko: Stellar Evolution Within and off the Main Sequence

    Iben, J. Icko: Stellar Evolution Within and off the Main Sequence. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 5, 571 (1967) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev. aa.05.090167.003035

    arXiv 1967

  3. [2]

    Deliyannis, C.P., Demarque, P., Kawaler, S.D.: Lithium in Halo Stars from Stan- dard Stellar Evolution. The Astrophysical Journal Supplemental Series 73, 21 (1990) https://doi.org/10.1086/191439 8 5000 50005500 6000 6000 5500 Teff (K) 2.0 2.0 2.2 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.6 2.6 2.8 2.8 3.0 3.0 3.2 3.2 3.4 3.4 3.6 3.6 MV (mag) M67 detection M67 3 upper limit M67 Gaia ...

    doi:10.1086/191439 1990

  4. [3]

    Cummings, J.D., Deliyannis, C.P., Maderak, R.M., Steinhauer, A.: WIYN Open Cluster Study. LXXV. Testing the Metallicity Dependence of Stellar Lithium Depletion Using Hyades-aged Clusters. I. Hyades and Praesepe. The Astro- nomical Journal 153(3), 128 (2017) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/aa5b86 arXiv:1702.03936 [astro-ph.SR] 9

    arXiv 2017

  5. [4]

    The Astrophys- ical Journal Letters 302, 49 (1986) https://doi.org/10.1086/184635

    Boesgaard, A.M., Tripicco, M.J.: Lithium in the Hyades Cluster. The Astrophys- ical Journal Letters 302, 49 (1986) https://doi.org/10.1086/184635

    doi:10.1086/184635 1986

  6. [5]

    The Astrophysical Journal 302, 650 (1986) https://doi.org/10.1086/ 164025

    Michaud, G.: The Lithium Abundance Gap in the Hyades F Stars: The Signature of Diffusion. The Astrophysical Journal 302, 650 (1986) https://doi.org/10.1086/ 164025

    work page 1986

  7. [6]

    The Astrophysical Journal 416, 312 (1993) https://doi.org/10.1086/173237

    Richer, J., Michaud, G.: Diffusion of Lithium and Beryllium in Evolving, Nonro- tating Main-Sequence A and F Stars. The Astrophysical Journal 416, 312 (1993) https://doi.org/10.1086/173237

    doi:10.1086/173237 1993

  8. [7]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters 359, 55 (1990) https://doi

    Schramm, D.N., Steigman, G., Dearborn, D.S.P.: Main-Sequence Mass Loss and the Lithium Dip. The Astrophysical Journal Letters 359, 55 (1990) https://doi. org/10.1086/185794

    doi:10.1086/185794 1990

Show all 53 references
  1. [8]

    The Astrophysical Journal 377, 268 (1991) https://doi.org/10.1086/ 170356

    Garcia Lopez, R.J., Spruit, H.C.: Li Depletion in F Stars by Internal Grav- ity Waves. The Astrophysical Journal 377, 268 (1991) https://doi.org/10.1086/ 170356

    1991

  2. [9]

    The Astrophysical Journal 338, 424 (1989) https://doi.org/ 10.1086/167210

    Pinsonneault, M.H., Kawaler, S.D., Sofia, S., Demarque, P.: Evolutionary Models of the Rotating Sun. The Astrophysical Journal 338, 424 (1989) https://doi.org/ 10.1086/167210

    1989 doi

  3. [10]

    The Astrophysical Journal Supplemental Series 74, 501 (1990) https://doi.org/10.1086/191507

    Pinsonneault, M.H., Kawaler, S.D., Demarque, P.: Rotation of Low-Mass Stars: A New Probe of Stellar Evolution. The Astrophysical Journal Supplemental Series 74, 501 (1990) https://doi.org/10.1086/191507

    1990 doi

  4. [11]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society304(4), 821–828 (1999) https: //doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02347.x

    Jeffries, R.D.: Lithium in the low-mass stars of the Coma Berenices open cluster. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society304(4), 821–828 (1999) https: //doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02347.x

    1999

  5. [12]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 336(4), 1109–1128 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1046/ j.1365-8711.2002.05788.x arXiv:astro-ph/0206367 [astro-ph]

    Jeffries, R.D., Totten, E.J., Harmer, S., Deliyannis, C.P.: Membership, metallicity and lithium abundances for solar-type stars in NGC 6633. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 336(4), 1109–1128 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1046/ j.1365-8711.2002.05788.x arXiv:astro...

    2002

  6. [13]

    The Astro- nomical Journal 158(4), 163 (2019) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ab3fad arXiv:1909.04523 [astro-ph.SR]

    Deliyannis, C.P., Anthony-Twarog, B.J., Lee-Brown, D.B., Twarog, B.A.: Li Evo- lution and the Open Cluster NGC 6819: A Correlation between Li Depletion and Spindown in Dwarfs More Massive Than the F-Dwarf Li-Dip. The Astro- nomical Journal 158(4), 163 (2019) https://doi.org/10...

    2019 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Reviews of Modern Physics 67(4), 781–808 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.67.781 arXiv:hep-ph/9505425 [hep-ph]

    Bahcall, J.N., Pinsonneault, M.H., Wasserburg, G.J.: Solar models with helium and heavy-element diffusion. Reviews of Modern Physics 67(4), 781–808 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.67.781 arXiv:hep-ph/9505425 [hep-ph]

    1995 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Bahcall, J.N., Pinsonneault, M.H.: What Do We (Not) Know Theoretically about 10 Solar Neutrino Fluxes? Physical Review Letters 92(12), 121301 (2004) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.121301 arXiv:astro-ph/0402114 [astro-ph]

    2004 arXiv

  9. [16]

    The Astrophys- ical Journal Letters 498(2), 147–151 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1086/311317

    Deliyannis, C.P., Boesgaard, A.M., Stephens, A., King, J.R., Vogt, S.S., Keane, M.J.: Correlated Depletion of Lithium and Beryllium in F Stars. The Astrophys- ical Journal Letters 498(2), 147–151 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1086/311317

    1998 doi

  10. [17]

    The Astrophysical Journal 613(2), 1202–1212 (2004) https://doi.org/10

    Boesgaard, A.M., Armengaud, E., King, J.R., Deliyannis, C.P., Stephens, A.: The Correlation of Lithium and Beryllium in F and G Field and Cluster Dwarf Stars. The Astrophysical Journal 613(2), 1202–1212 (2004) https://doi.org/10. 1086/423194

    2004

  11. [18]

    The Astrophysical Journal 492(2), 727–742 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1086/305059

    Boesgaard, A.M., Deliyannis, C.P., Stephens, A., Lambert, D.L.: Boron in Lithium- and Beryllium-deficient F Stars. The Astrophysical Journal 492(2), 727–742 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1086/305059

    1998 doi

  12. [19]

    The Astrophysical Journal 621(2), 991–998 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1086/427687 arXiv:astro-ph/0411246 [astro-ph]

    Boesgaard, A.M., Deliyannis, C.P., Steinhauer, A.: Boron Depletion in F and G Dwarf Stars and the Beryllium-Boron Correlation. The Astrophysical Journal 621(2), 991–998 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1086/427687 arXiv:astro-ph/0411246 [astro-ph]

    2005 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Li-Be Dip

    Boesgaard, A.M., Lum, M.G., Deliyannis, C.P., King, J.R., Pinsonneault, M.H., Somers, G.: Boron Abundances Across the “Li-Be Dip” in the Hyades Clus- ter. The Astrophysical Journal 830(1), 49 (2016) https://doi.org/10.3847/ 0004-637X/830/1/49 arXiv:1606.07117 [astro-ph.SR]

    2016 arXiv

  14. [21]

    The Astrophysical Journal488(2), 836–840 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1086/ 304747

    Deliyannis, C.P., Pinsonneault, M.H.: 110 Herculis: A Possible Prototype for Simultaneous Lithium and Beryllium Depletion, and Implications for Stellar Inte- riors. The Astrophysical Journal488(2), 836–840 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1086/ 304747

    1997

  15. [22]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 449(4), 4131–4146 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv630 arXiv:1410.4238 [astro-ph.SR]

    Somers, G., Pinsonneault, M.H.: Rotation, inflation, and lithium in the Pleiades. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 449(4), 4131–4146 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv630 arXiv:1410.4238 [astro-ph.SR]

    2015 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Thorburn, J.A., Hobbs, L.M., Deliyannis, C.P., Pinsonneault, M.H.: Lithium in the Hyades. I. New Observations. The Astrophysical Journal 415, 150 (1993) https://doi.org/10.1086/173152

    1993 doi

  17. [24]

    M48 (NGC 2548) 2: Lithium Abundances in the 420 Myr Open Cluster M48 from Giants through K Dwarfs

    Sun, Q., Deliyannis, C.P., Steinhauer, A., Anthony-Twarog, B.J., Twarog, B.A.: WIYN Open Cluster Study 89. M48 (NGC 2548) 2: Lithium Abundances in the 420 Myr Open Cluster M48 from Giants through K Dwarfs. The Astro- physical Journal 952(1), 71 (2023) https://doi.org/10.3847/1...

    2023 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 476(3), 3245–3262 11 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty374 arXiv:1802.04288 [astro-ph.SR]

    Jackson, R.J., Deliyannis, C.P., Jeffries, R.D.: The inflated radii of M dwarfs in the Pleiades. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 476(3), 3245–3262 11 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty374 arXiv:1802.04288 [astro-ph.SR]

    2018 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Space Science Reviews 217(3), 44 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-021-00825-8

    Lodders, K.: Relative Atomic Solar System Abundances, Mass Fractions, and Atomic Masses of the Elements and Their Isotopes, Composition of the Solar Photosphere, and Compositions of the Major Chondritic Meteorite Groups. Space Science Reviews 217(3), 44 (2021) https://doi.org/...

    2021 doi

  20. [27]

    Annual Review of Astronomy and Astro- physics 35, 557–605 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.astro.35.1.557

    Pinsonneault, M.: Mixing in Stars. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astro- physics 35, 557–605 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.astro.35.1.557

    1997 doi

  21. [28]

    The Astrophysical Journal Supplemental Series 136(2), 417–437 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1086/321795 arXiv:astro-ph/0104292 [astro-ph]

    Yi, S., Demarque, P., Kim, Y.-C., Lee, Y.-W., Ree, C.H., Lejeune, T., Barnes, S.: Toward Better Age Estimates for Stellar Populations: The Y 2 Isochrones for Solar Mixture. The Astrophysical Journal Supplemental Series 136(2), 417–437 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1086/321795 arXi...

    2001 arXiv

  22. [29]

    The Astronomical Journal 113, 1871 (1997) https: //doi.org/10.1086/118399

    King, J.R., Deliyannis, C.P., Hiltgen, D.D., Stephens, A., Cunha, K., Boes- gaard, A.M.: Lithium Abundances in the Solar Twins 16 CYG A and B and the Solar Analog alpha CEN A, Calibration of the 6707 Angstrom Li Region Linelist, and Implications. The Astronomical Journal 113, ...

    1997 doi

  23. [30]

    PhD thesis, Indiana University, Bloom- ington (January 2007)

    Margheim, S.J.: Lithium in the Pleiades. PhD thesis, Indiana University, Bloom- ington (January 2007)

    2007

  24. [31]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics 613, 63 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201731881 arXiv:1712.06525 [astro-ph.SR]

    Bouvier, J., Barrado, D., Moraux, E., Stauffer, J., Rebull, L., Hillenbrand, L., Bayo, A., Boisse, I., Bouy, H., DiFolco, E., Lillo-Box, J., Morales Calder´ on, M.: The lithium-rotation connection in the 125 Myr-old Pleiades cluster. Astronomy and Astrophysics 613, 63 (2018) h...

    2018 arXiv

  25. [32]

    The Astrophysical Journal 332, 410 (1988) https://doi

    Boesgaard, A.M., Budge, K.G.: Lithium in the Hyades, the Hyades Moving Group, and Praesepe. The Astrophysical Journal 332, 410 (1988) https://doi. org/10.1086/166665

    1988 doi

  26. [33]

    Soderblom, D.R., Oey, M.S., Johnson, D.R.H., Stone, R.P.S.: The Evolution of the Lithium Abundances of Solar-Type Stars. I. The Hyades and Coma Berenices Clusters. The Astronomical Journal 99, 595 (1990) https://doi.org/10.1086/ 115353

    1990

  27. [34]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics 220, 197–205 (1989)

    Burkhart, C., Coupry, M.F.: AM stars of the Hyades cluster : temperatures, lithium, and the heavier elements, Al, SI and Fe. Astronomy and Astrophysics 220, 197–205 (1989)

    1989

  28. [35]

    Sills, A., Deliyannis, C.P.: WIYN Open Cluster Study. VI. Interpretive Models of Light-Element Depletion from M67 Subgiants. The Astrophysical Journal544(2), 944–952 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1086/317258 12

    2000 doi

  29. [37]

    The Astrophysical Journal 888(1), 28 (2020) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab4fdb

    Boesgaard, A.M., Lum, M.G., Deliyannis, C.P.: Correlated Depletion and Dilu- tion of Lithium and Beryllium Revealed by Subgiants in M67. The Astrophysical Journal 888(1), 28 (2020) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab4fdb

    2020 doi

  30. [38]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 513(4), 5387–5406 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/ stac1251 arXiv:2205.00631 [astro-ph.SR]

    Sun, Q., Deliyannis, C.P., Twarog, B.A., Anthony-Twarog, B.J., Cummings, J.D., Steinhauer, A.: WIYN open cluster study: The old open cluster, NGC 188, and a re-evaluation of Lithium-richness among red giants. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 513(4), 5387–5406 ...

    2022 arXiv

  31. [39]

    The Astronomical Journal 159(6), 246 (2020) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ab8814 arXiv:2004.10902 [astro-ph.SR]

    Sun, Q., Deliyannis, C.P., Twarog, B.A., Anthony-Twarog, B.J., Steinhauer, A.: WIYN Open Cluster Study LXXX: HDI CCD UBVRI Photometry of the Old Open Cluster NGC 7142 and Comparison to M67. The Astronomical Journal 159(6), 246 (2020) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ab8814 ar...

    2020 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Nature 297(5866), 483–485 (1982) https://doi.org/10.1038/297483a0

    Spite, M., Spite, F.: Lithium abundance at the formation of the Galaxy. Nature 297(5866), 483–485 (1982) https://doi.org/10.1038/297483a0

    1982 doi

  33. [41]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics 115, 357–366 (1982)

    Spite, F., Spite, M.: Abundance of lithium in unevolved stars and old disk stars : Interpretation and consequences. Astronomy and Astrophysics 115, 357–366 (1982)

    1982

  34. [42]

    PhD thesis, Indiana University, Bloomington (January 2011)

    Cummings, J.: Correlation of initial lithium and iron in young open clusters. PhD thesis, Indiana University, Bloomington (January 2011)

    2011

  35. [43]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics 640, 1 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038688 arXiv:2007.02888 [astro-ph.SR]

    Randich, S., Pasquini, L., Franciosini, E., Magrini, L., Jackson, R.J., Jeffries, R.D., d’Orazi, V., Romano, D., Sanna, N., Tautvaiˇ sien˙ e, G., Tsantaki, M., Wright, N.J., Gilmore, G., Bensby, T., Bragaglia, A., Pancino, E., Smiljanic, R., Bayo, A., Carraro, G., Gonneau, A.,...

    2020 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Reports on Progress in Physics 59(12), 1493–1609 (1996) https://doi.org/10

    Sarkar, S.: Big bang nucleosynthesis and physics beyond the standard model. Reports on Progress in Physics 59(12), 1493–1609 (1996) https://doi.org/10. 1088/0034-4885/59/12/001 arXiv:hep-ph/9602260 [hep-ph]

    1996 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2020(3), 010 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/03/010 arXiv:1912.01132 [astro- ph.CO] 13

    Fields, B.D., Olive, K.A., Yeh, T.-H., Young, C.: Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis after Planck. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2020(3), 010 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/03/010 arXiv:1912.01132 [astro- ph.CO] 13

    2020 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics 618, 93 (2018) https: //doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833476 arXiv:1805.08726 [astro-ph.GA]

    Cantat-Gaudin, T., Jordi, C., Vallenari, A., Bragaglia, A., Balaguer-N´ u˜ nez, L., Soubiran, C., Bossini, D., Moitinho, A., Castro-Ginard, A., Krone-Martins, A., Casamiquela, L., Sordo, R., Carrera, R.: A Gaia DR2 view of the open cluster population in the Milky Way. Astronom...

    2018 arXiv

  39. [47]

    The Astrophysical Journal 345, 245 (1989) https://doi.org/10.1086/167900

    Cardelli, J.A., Clayton, G.C., Mathis, J.S.: The Relationship between Infrared, Optical, and Ultraviolet Extinction. The Astrophysical Journal 345, 245 (1989) https://doi.org/10.1086/167900

    1989 doi

  40. [48]

    Summary of the contents and survey properties

    Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A.G.A., Vallenari, A., Prusti, T., de Bruijne, J.H.J., Babusiaux, C., Bailer-Jones, C.A.L., Biermann, M., Evans, D.W., Eyer, L., al.: Gaia Data Release 2. Summary of the contents and survey properties. Astronomy and Astrophysics 616, 1 (2018) https:/...

    2018 arXiv

  41. [49]

    The Astrophysical Journal Supplemental Series 155(2), 667–674 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1086/424966

    Demarque, P., Woo, J.-H., Kim, Y.-C., Yi, S.K.: Y 2 Isochrones with an Improved Core Overshoot Treatment. The Astrophysical Journal Supplemental Series 155(2), 667–674 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1086/424966

    2004 doi

  42. [50]

    The Astrophysical Journal 414, 740 (1993) https://doi.org/10.1086/173120

    Deliyannis, C.P., Pinsonneault, M.H., Duncan, D.K.: Evidence for a Dispersion in the Lithium Abundances of Extreme Halo Stars. The Astrophysical Journal 414, 740 (1993) https://doi.org/10.1086/173120

    1993 doi

  43. [51]

    In: Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, vol

    Montgomery, K., Marschall, L., Janes, K.A.: CCD Photometry of the Old Open Cluster, M67. In: Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, vol. 22, p. 1288 (1990)

    1990

  44. [52]

    The Astrophysical Journal935(2), 167 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74 arXiv:2206.14220 [astro-ph.IM]

    Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A.M., Lim, P.L., Earl, N., Starkman, N., Bradley, L., Shupe, D.L., Patil, A.A., Corrales, L., Brasseur, C.E., N¨ othe, M., Donath, A., Tollerud, E., Morris, B.M., Ginsburg, A., Vaher, E., Weaver, B.A., Tocknell, J., Jamieson, W., van Kerkwi...

    2022 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Platais, I., Kozhurina-Platais, V., Mathieu, R.D., Girard, T.M., van Altena, W.F.: WIYN Open Cluster Study. XVII. Astrometry and Membership to V=21 in NGC 188. The Astronomical Journal 126(6), 2922–2935 (2003) https://doi.org/ 10.1086/379677 arXiv:astro-ph/0309749 [astro-ph] 15

    2003 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.