Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 8 minor 48 references

Disorder-enabled Synthetic Metasurfaces

T0 review · 3 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Engineered random meta-pixel distributions preserve optical performance at a fraction of the aperture area, letting one flat surface act as many optical components at once.

desk verdict Impressive experimental demos of a useful principle, but the 'no compromise' claim needs efficiency and finite-Q crosstalk numbers before it fully lands. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.04696 v1 pith:P4X4DHFB submitted 2025-07-07 physics.optics physics.app-ph

Chi Li , Changxu Liu , Cade Peters , Haoyi Yu , Stefan A. Maier , Andrew Forbes , Haoran Ren This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsphysics.app-ph
keywords metasurfacesengineereddisorderfunctionaldensityachromaticmetalensquasi-boundstatesinthecontinuumpolarimetricimagingvectorbeamsopticalskyrmions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that engineered structural disorder, not order, is the key to packing more functions into an optical metasurface. Randomly distributing the meta-pixels—functionally distinct subwavelength cells—that carry each function keeps focusing near the diffraction limit even when only about 10% of the aperture is used for that function, so the unused space can carry other functions addressed by wavelength, polarization, or orbital angular momentum. As proof, the authors build a synthetic achromatic metalens that superposes 11 wavelength-specific lens shares onto one 8.1-mm aperture and focuses diffraction-limited across 1200–1400 nm, with an average Strehl ratio of $0.869 \pm 0.073$. They also build a synthetic polarimetric metasurface that separates three polarization bases into distinct diffraction orders, resolving arbitrary vector beams and an optical skyrmion in a single shot.

What carries the argument

The mechanism is random meta-pixel sampling combined with per-function optical selectivity. A function is written into a random subset of pixels; the random placement suppresses Bragg diffraction orders and keeps the point-spread function clean at low fill fraction, while the meta-pixels' optical response isolates shares—quasi-bound-state-in-the-continuum (qBIC) resonances for wavelength channels, and nanopillar birefringence plus geometric phase for polarization channels. The T-shaped qBIC meta-pixels provide a $4\theta$ geometric phase via in-plane rotation while maintaining sharp resonances, giving full $0$–$2\pi$ phase control at resonance with quality factors around 150.

What would settle it

Measure the point-spread function of the 11-share synthetic metalens at wavelengths between the design resonances, for example near 1205–1210 nm, and compare the Strehl ratio with the ideal-filter prediction; a clear dip below the predicted band would show that finite-Q qBIC crosstalk breaks the disorder-enabled synthesis. A stronger test is to fabricate a 21- or 41-share device and check whether the measured Strehl follows the simulated curve or falls off as off-resonance leakage accumulates.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery, stated on the paper's own terms, is that randomly interleaving functionally distinct meta-pixels, rather than partitioning the aperture into ordered zones, lets a single metasurface deliver many functions at full optical quality. In focusing tests, disordered sampling holds the Strehl ratio near unity until the area fraction falls below about 10%, while a contiguous sector degrades steadily; at a 50% area fraction, moving from ordered to disordered placement lifts the Strehl ratio from 0.6 to nearly 1.0. The authors generalize this into a synthetic design strategy: each function gets a random, non-overlapping share of the aperture, the shares are isolated by sharp spectral or polarization response, and their phase profiles are superposed into one device. The experimental flagships are an 11-share achromatic metalens with an 8.1-mm aperture and average Strehl ratio $0.869 \pm 0.073$ across 1200–1400 nm, and a polarimetric metasurface that reconstructs Poincaré-sphere states to a mean mismatch of $0.039 \pm 0.017$ while imaging vector beams and optical skyrmions.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that each meta-pixel acts as an ideal filter, transmitting perfectly at its assigned wavelength or polarization and nothing elsewhere; the simulated performance-versus-area curves assume this, while the fabricated qBIC pixels have quality factors around 150 and leak off-resonance, so insufficient spectral isolation would degrade the achromatic focus.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • An 11-share synthetic achromatic metalens with an 8.1-mm aperture focuses diffraction-limited across 1200–1400 nm, with an average Strehl ratio of 0.869 ± 0.073 and a focal shift about 1/40 of the chromatic reference.
  • Random pixel sampling keeps focusing near the diffraction limit down to about 10% area use, while ordered sector sampling degrades steadily, so disorder is what enables the area saving.
  • Because each function is isolated by wavelength or polarization, additional functions add no design complexity beyond the design of each single-function share.
  • The same synthetic construction gives a polarimetric metasurface that reconstructs arbitrary states on the Poincaré sphere (mean mismatch 0.039 ± 0.017) and resolves radial and azimuthal vector beams and an optical skyrmion in one shot.
  • The framework extends to orbital-angular-momentum selectivity, combined polarization-wavelength control, and hierarchical integration such as an achromatic lens and polarimeter in the same aperture.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the random-sampling result should transfer to other pixelated wavefront shapers, making the functional-density ratio a general measure of how much spatial redundancy a given optical function carries.
  • Editorial inference: because random placement suppresses Bragg orders, synthetic metasurfaces could tolerate larger meta-pixel footprints or lower fabrication fidelity than periodic interleaving, which would simplify large-area fabrication.
  • Editorial inference: a decisive test of the ideal-filter assumption is to tune between the eleven resonance wavelengths and watch the focal Strehl ratio; a measurable dip would set the maximum number of wavelength shares a finite-Q platform can support.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 8 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a 'synthetic metasurface' strategy in which distinct optical functions are encoded into meta-pixels that are randomly interleaved across the aperture and selectively addressed by wavelength, polarization, or orbital angular momentum. The central claim is that engineered spatial disorder of meta-pixels reduces the area required to realize each function without compromising optical performance. The authors support this with simulations showing that randomly sampled lenses maintain high Strehl ratios at low fill factors, and then demonstrate two experimental platforms: an 11-wavelength synthetic achromatic metalens with an 8.1 mm aperture that achieves diffraction-limited focusing from 1200 nm to 1400 nm (average Strehl ratio 0.869±0.073), and a polarization-multiplexed metasurface that performs single-shot polarimetric imaging of radially and azimuthally polarized vector beams and an optical skyrmion.

Significance. If the claims are fully substantiated, the paper would make a useful contribution by offering a simple, scalable route to multi-function metasurfaces that bypasses the difficult meta-atom-level dispersion engineering required by conventional achromatic designs. The experimental demonstrations are substantial: an 8.1 mm aperture achromatic metalens with 11 wavelength shares and a polarimetric device capable of single-shot skyrmion characterization are notable. The work also ships forward simulations without fitted constants, which is a strength, and the availability statement promises full data release. The concept of using random interleaving to suppress Bragg diffraction and maintain focal quality is clearly presented and supported by simulation and experiment.

major comments (3)
  1. [Fig. 2e-2f and the paragraph beginning 'For simplicity, we assume ideal spectral selectivity'] The design-envelope chart in Fig. 2f is computed with an ideal bandpass model in which each meta-pixel transmits unit amplitude at its designated wavelength and zero elsewhere. The fabricated qBIC meta-pixels have a measured Q of ~150, implying a linewidth of roughly 8.7 nm at 1300 nm, while adjacent shares are spaced by 20 nm. A Lorentzian response then gives ~4-5% off-resonance transmission at neighboring shares. Since at any wavelength (Df-1)/Df of the aperture is off-resonance, this leakage creates a non-negligible background that the ideal-filter simulation does not capture. The main text does not quantify this crosstalk or provide a simulation that replaces the ideal filter with the measured finite-Q response. Please provide such a simulation for Fig. 2f, or at minimum report the off-resonance transmission spectra and a crosstalk analysis, to support the extrapolation to high Df values.
  2. [Fig. 2b and Fig. 4f; the 'no compromise' claim in the abstract and conclusion] The Strehl ratio is reported without specifying the reference aperture. For a randomly sampled sparse lens with fill factor p, the peak intensity relative to a fully filled aperture scales as p^2; a Strehl ratio near 1 can only be obtained if the reference is the diffraction-limited PSF of the same sparse pupil. If that is the normalization used, the statement that the strategy achieves 'uncompromised optical performance' is misleading: the absolute focusing efficiency, which is relevant for most applications, is reduced by a factor of order p^2 = (1/Df)^2. The paper does not report absolute focusing efficiencies or measured throughput for either the synthetic achromatic metalens or the polarimetric metasurface, and the supplementary discussion of energy efficiency is not summarized in the main text. Please state the Strehl-ratio reference explicitly, report absolute efficiencies, and temper the 'no compromise' claim accordingly, or explicitly reframe it as 'no compromise in focusing quality at the cost of throughput'.
  3. [Methods/Sec. Fig. 4 and Supplementary S3D] The meta-pixel footprint is fixed at 8.1 µm x 8.1 µm and contains 7x7 unit cells at 1400 nm, which gives only a coarse discrete sampling of the phase profile (7x7 phase levels per meta-pixel). The manuscript states that using differently oriented T-shaped elements within a single meta-pixel enables 'local phase variation' and 'enhancing focusing efficiency' (Supplementary S3D), but the main-text characterization of the 11-share lens appears to use identical orientations within each meta-pixel, i.e., a single phase value per 8.1 µm pixel. The effect of this discretization on the Strehl ratio is not quantified. Please include a calculation that separates the contributions of sparse sampling and intra-pixel phase quantization to the measured SR, and clarify whether the theoretical SR in Fig. 4f accounts for both effects.
minor comments (8)
  1. [Fig. 2b caption] The rightmost inset for p=0.1% is said to show a discernible focal spot, but the corresponding SR value would be useful; please include it on the plot or in the caption.
  2. [Abstract and Conclusion] The wording 'without compromising optical performance' appears in the abstract, while the conclusion more cautiously says off-resonant transmission is 'reduced' to decrease crosstalk; please make the wording consistent and align both with the actual metrics reported.
  3. [Fig. 4c] The reference metalens labeled a 'single-share design' is better described as a chromatic lens that contains only one of the 11 shares; please clarify this to avoid confusion with a conventional full-aperture single-wavelength lens.
  4. [Fig. 5f] Please provide a brief description of how the topological number of the skyrmion is extracted from the k-space polarimetric projections, since this is a non-trivial analysis step.
  5. [Introduction and Fig. 1d caption] The claim of 'previously unattainable single-shot, high-spatial-resolution polarimetric imaging' is too strong; existing single-shot polarimeters already provide full-Stokes images. Please temper this claim to what is specifically enabled by this metasurface platform.
  6. [General] The term 'synthetic metasurface' is used without a definition in the abstract; a one-sentence definition at first use would help readers.
  7. [Fig. 3b] Please state the functional form used for the resonance fitting (e.g., Lorentzian) so that the reported Q factors are reproducible.
  8. [Methods] The sentence 'In Figures 2a-2d, 5a, the pixel sizes are enlarged for the visualisation' should clarify whether the SR results in Fig. 2b and Fig. 2f are computed with the enlarged or the actual pixel size, since this could affect the quantitative results.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the performance predictions are forward simulations with independent experimental checks, and the ideal-filter assumption is an acknowledged idealization rather than a fitted input.

full rationale

The paper's central performance map, the Strehl-ratio-versus-Df curves in Fig. 2f, is produced by an angular-spectrum forward model under an explicit idealization: "For simplicity, we assume ideal spectral selectivity, wherein each lens function is exclusively activated by its corresponding wavelength... each phase pixel is modelled with unitary transmission for its designated spectral band and zero transmission outside it." This is a stated modeling assumption, not a fitted parameter. No constants are extracted from the measured Strehl ratios or polarimetric errors; the experimental average Strehl ratio of 0.869±0.073 is reported as an independent validation result, and the qBIC resonance positions from Fig. 3c are measured inputs used in the design. Similarly, the polarimetric metasurface projects fixed polarization bases into distinct k-space directions, and the reported mismatch of 0.039±0.017 is an independent error metric rather than a calibration target. The paper's self-citations (refs 18 and 25) are used for background principles such as OAM holography and prior achromatic metafiber work; they are not load-bearing for the new disorder-sampling claim, and no uniqueness theorem from the authors' prior work is invoked to force the design choice. The acknowledged finite-Q limitation is a robustness caveat: fabricated qBIC meta-pixels have Q~150 and off-resonance transmission is not quantified, so the experimental Df=11 point does not fully validate the ideal-filter chart at higher functional densities. This is an experimental-security gap, not a circular derivation. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained and the predictions are not equivalent to their inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is an experimental and numerical demonstration rather than a parameter-free theory. It introduces no new fitted constants; design degrees of freedom (scaling factors, unit-cell numbers) are design choices. The main load-bearing modeling inputs are the spectral-selectivity idealization and neglect of inter-pixel coupling.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Angular spectrum propagation models each meta-pixel as an independent scatterer with its designed complex transmission; near-field coupling between adjacent meta-pixels is neglected.
    Used in all focusing simulations (Fig. 2, Methods). If coupling were significant, the independently designed shares would not retain their spectral or phase responses in the assembled device.
  • ad hoc to paper Ideal spectral selectivity: each meta-pixel transmits only at its designated wavelength and is opaque otherwise (Fig. 2e).
    Introduced to compute the SR-versus-Df chart in Fig. 2f; real qBIC meta-pixels have Q~150 and finite off-resonance transmission, so this is an idealized input to the design prediction, not a measured property.
  • domain assumption qBIC meta-pixels provide pure geometric phase with a 4θ rotation law and a phase response that is uniform across the resonance linewidth (from refs 46, 47 and Fig. 3d).
    The phase encoding of the 11 lens profiles assumes this relationship is valid at each wavelength; Fig. 3d shows resonance preservation under rotation, supporting but not proving phase purity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Disorder-enabled Synthetic Metasurfaces." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/P4X4DHFB

@misc{pith2026250704696,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Disorder-enabled Synthetic Metasurfaces},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/P4X4DHFB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.04696}
}
read the original abstract

Optical metasurfaces have catalyzed transformative advances across imaging, optoelectronics, quantum information processing, sensing, energy conversion, and optical computing. Yet, despite this rapid progress, most research remains focused on optimizing single functionalities, constrained by the persistent challenge of integrating multiple functions within a single device. Here, we demonstrate that engineered structural disorder of metapixels, used to implement a photonic function, can significantly reduce the area required across the entire aperture without compromising optical performance. The unallocated space can then be repurposed to encode functionally distinct metapixels without increasing the design complexity, each independently addressable via various optical degrees of freedom. As a proof of concept, we present a synthetic achromatic metalens featuring 11 spectrally distinct lens profiles encoded through nonlocal metapixels engineered to support sharp resonances via quasi bound states in the continuum. This large-scale metalens with 8.1 mm aperture achieves diffraction-limited achromatic focusing across the 1200 to 1400 nm spectral window. We further incorporate polarization-selective metapixels to implement momentum-space distinct gratings, enabling single-shot, high spatial resolution polarimetric imaging of arbitrarily structured light fields, including radial and azimuthal vector beams and optical skyrmions. Altogether, this disorder-enabled synthetic metasurface platform establishes a versatile foundation for unifying diverse photonic functionalities within a single optical element, marking a substantial step toward compact, high-density, multifunctional optical devices.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.04696 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Disorder-enhanced functional density and its application in synthetic metasurfaces. (a) Comparison of two strategies for area utilisation in single-function metasurfaces: sector-based segmentation (ordered, top) and random sampling (disordered, bottom). As the area usage fraction p decreases, progressively less area is allocated to the target function. (b) Strehl ratio (SR) of a metalens as a function of p for the o… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Resonance characterisation of T-shaped meta-pixels supporting quasi-bound states in the continuum (qBICs), showing the dependence on unit cell number and robustness against in-plane rotational variations. (a) Schematics of meta-pixels composed of T-shaped unit-cell arrays, alongside an optical image of the fabricated sample under cross-circular polarisation illumination and collection. Each unit cell contains four r… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Fabrication and optical characterisation of a synthetic achromatic metalens. (a) Optical images of the fabricated synthetic metalens with an 8 mm diameter on a quartz substrate. (b) SEM image of zoom-in meta-pixels, with functionally distinct pixels highlighted in false colours. The rotated structures used for phase encoding are magnified for clarity in the bottom row. (c) Measured longitudinal point spread function… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J.; Averitt, R

    Padilla, W. J.; Averitt, R. D., Imaging with metamaterials. Nature Reviews Physics 2022, 4 (2), 85-100

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Nature Reviews Electrical Engineering 2024, 1 (6), 391-411

    Wang, X.; Hao, H.; He, X.; Xie, P.; Liu, J.; Tan, J.; Li, H.; Wang, H.; Genevet, P.; Luo, Y., Advances in information processing and biological imaging using flat optics. Nature Reviews Electrical Engineering 2024, 1 (6), 391-411

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    T.; Li, Q.; Yan g, J

    Ha, S. T.; Li, Q.; Yan g, J. K.; Demir, H. V.; Brongersma, M. L.; Kuznetsov, A. I., Optoelectronic metadevices. Science 2024, 386 (6725), eadm7442

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    S.; Agarwal, G

    Solntsev, A. S.; Agarwal, G. S.; Kivshar, Y. S., Metasurfaces for quantum photonics. Nature Photonics 2021, 15 (5), 327-336

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    -Y.; Neshev, D

    Tittl, A.; Leitis, A.; Liu, M.; Yesilkoy, F.; Choi, D. -Y.; Neshev, D. N.; Kivshar, Y. S.; Altug, H., Imaging -based molecular barcoding with pixelated dielectric metasurfaces. Science 2018, 360 (6393), 1105-1109

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    A.; Ren, H., Plasmonic bound states in the continuum to tailor light-matter coupling

    Aigner, A.; Tittl, A.; Wang, J.; Weber, T .; Kivshar, Y.; Maier, S. A.; Ren, H., Plasmonic bound states in the continuum to tailor light-matter coupling. Science Advances 2022, 8 (49), eadd4816

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    J.; Sortino, L.; Mancini, A.; Ezendam, S.; Saris, S.; de S

    Cortés, E.; Wendisch, F. J.; Sortino, L.; Mancini, A.; Ezendam, S.; Saris, S.; de S. Menezes, L.; Tittl, A.; Ren, H.; Maier, S. A., Optical metasurfaces for energy conversion. Chemical Reviews 2022, 122 (19), 15082-15176

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    L.; Alù, A.; Fleury, R., Analogue computing with metamaterials

    Zangeneh-Nejad, F.; Sounas, D. L.; Alù, A.; Fleury, R., Analogue computing with metamaterials. Nature Reviews Materials 2021, 6 (3), 207-225

    work page 2021

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    Nature Communications 2025, 16 (1), 1154

    Qian, C.; Kaminer, I.; Chen, H., A guidance to intelligent metamaterials and metamaterials intelligence. Nature Communications 2025, 16 (1), 1154

    2025

  2. [10]

    A.; Boltasseva, A.; Cai, W.; Liu, Y., Deep learning for the design of photonic structures

    Ma, W.; Liu, Z.; Kudyshev, Z. A.; Boltasseva, A.; Cai, W.; Liu, Y., Deep learning for the design of photonic structures. Nature Photonics 2021, 15 (2), 77-90

    2021

  3. [11]

    A.; Aieta, F.; Tetienne, J

    Yu, N.; Genevet, P.; Kats, M. A.; Aieta, F.; Tetienne, J. P.; Capasso, F.; Gaburro, Z., Light propagation with phase discontinuities: generalized laws of reflection and refraction. Science 2011, 334 (6054), 333-7

    2011

  4. [12]

    V.; Boltasseva, A.; Shalaev, V

    Kildishev, A. V.; Boltasseva, A.; Shalaev, V. M., Planar photonics with metasurfaces. Science 2013, 339 (6125), 1232009

    2013

  5. [13]

    T.; Devlin, R

    Khorasaninejad, M.; Chen, W. T.; Devlin, R. C.; Oh, J.; Zhu, A. Y.; Capasso, F., Metalenses at visible wavelengths: Diffraction-limited focusing and subwavelength resolution imaging. Science 2016, 352 (6290), 1190-1194

    2016

  6. [14]

    V.; Shalaev, V

    Ni, X.; Kildishev, A. V.; Shalaev, V. M., Metasurface holograms for visible light. Nature Communications 2013, 4 (1), 2807

    2013

  7. [15]

    -W.; Qiu, C.-W., Three-dimensional optical holography using a plasmonic metasurface

    Huang, L.; Chen, X.; Mühlenbernd, H.; Zhang, H.; Chen, S.; Bai, B.; Tan, Q.; Jin, G.; Cheah, K. -W.; Qiu, C.-W., Three-dimensional optical holography using a plasmonic metasurface. Nature Communications 2013, 4 (1), 2808

    2013

  8. [16]

    Nature Nanotechnology 2015, 10 (4), 308-312

    Zheng, G.; Mühlenbernd, H.; Kenney, M.; Li, G.; Zentgraf, T.; Zhang, S., Metasurface holograms reaching 80% efficiency. Nature Nanotechnology 2015, 10 (4), 308-312

    2015

  9. [17]

    N.; Kivshar, Y

    Wang, L.; Kruk, S.; Tang, H.; Li, T.; Kravchenko, I.; Neshev, D. N.; Kivshar, Y. S., Grayscale transparent metasurface holograms. Optica 2016, 3 (12), 1504-1505

    2016

  10. [18]

    A., Complex-amplitude metasurface-based orbital angular momentum holography in momentum space

    Ren, H.; Fang, X.; Jang, J.; Bürger, J.; Rho, J.; Maier, S. A., Complex-amplitude metasurface-based orbital angular momentum holography in momentum space. Nature Nanotechnology 2020, 15 (11), 948-955

    2020

  11. [19]

    T.; Zhu, A

    Chen, W. T.; Zhu, A. Y.; Sanjeev, V.; Khorasaninejad, M.; Shi, Z.; Lee, E.; Capasso, F., A broadband achromatic metalens for focusing and imaging in the visible. Nature Nanotechnology 2018, 13 (3), 220-226

    2018

  12. [20]

    C.; Su, V

    Wang, S.; Wu, P. C.; Su, V. -C.; Lai, Y.-C.; Chen, M. -K.; Kuo, H. Y.; Chen, B. H.; Chen, Y. H.; Huang, T. -T.; Wang, J.-H., A broadband achromatic metalens in the visible. Nature Nanotechnology 2018, 13 (3), 227-232

    2018

  13. [21]

    C.; Lu, M.; Stein, A.; Yu, N., Broadband achromatic dielectric metalenses

    Shrestha, S.; Overvig, A. C.; Lu, M.; Stein, A.; Yu, N., Broadband achromatic dielectric metalenses. Light: Science & Applications 2018, 7 (1), 85

    2018

  14. [22]

    J.; Su, V.-C.; Wang, S.; Chen, M

    Lin, R. J.; Su, V.-C.; Wang, S.; Chen, M. K.; Chung, T. L.; Chen, Y. H.; Kuo, H. Y.; Chen, J.-W.; Chen, J.; Huang, Y.-T., Achromatic metalens array for full -colour light-field imaging. Nature Nanotechnology 2019, 14 (3), 227- 231

    2019

  15. [23]

    -H.; Chang -Hasnain, C.; Kanté, B., Octave band width photonic fishnet - achromatic-metalens

    Ndao, A.; Hsu, L.; Ha, J.; Park, J. -H.; Chang -Hasnain, C.; Kanté, B., Octave band width photonic fishnet - achromatic-metalens. Nature Communications 2020, 11 (1), 3205

    2020

  16. [24]

    T.; Zhu, A

    Chen, W. T.; Zhu, A. Y.; Capasso, F., Flat optics with dispersion -engineered metasurfaces. Nature Reviews Materials 2020, 5 (8), 604-620

    2020

  17. [25]

    A.; Maier, S

    Ren, H.; Jang, J.; Li, C.; Aigner, A.; Plidschun, M.; Kim, J.; Rho, J.; Schmidt, M. A.; Maier, S. A., An achromatic metafiber for focusing and imaging across the entire telecommunication range. Nature Communications 2022, 13 (1), 4183

    2022

  18. [26]

    A.; D’Aversa, G.; Chevalier, P.; Shi, Z.; Chen, W

    Rubin, N. A.; D’Aversa, G.; Chevalier, P.; Shi, Z.; Chen, W. T.; Capasso, F., Matrix Fourier optics enables a compact full-Stokes polarization camera. Science 2019, 365 (6448), eaax1839

    2019

  19. [27]

    M.; Arbabi, A.; Faraon, A., Full-Stokes imaging polarimetry using dielectric metasurfaces

    Arbabi, E.; Kamali, S. M.; Arbabi, A.; Faraon, A., Full-Stokes imaging polarimetry using dielectric metasurfaces. 19 ACS Photonics 2018, 5 (8), 3132-3140

    2018

  20. [28]

    J.; Agrawal, A.; Lu, Y.; Xu, T., Disordered metasurface enabled single -shot full-Stokes polarization imaging leveraging weak dichroism

    Fan, Q.; Xu, W.; Hu, X.; Zhu, W.; Yue, T.; Yan, F.; Lin, P.; Chen, L.; Song, J.; Lezec, H. J.; Agrawal, A.; Lu, Y.; Xu, T., Disordered metasurface enabled single -shot full-Stokes polarization imaging leveraging weak dichroism. Nature Communications 2023, 14 (1), 7180

    2023

  21. [29]

    A.; Devlin, R

    Balthasar Mueller, J.; Rubin, N. A.; Devlin, R. C.; Groever, B.; Capasso, F., Metasurface polarization optics: independent phase control of arbitrar y orthogonal states of polarization. Physical Review Letters 2017, 118 (11), 113901

    2017

  22. [30]

    Kamali, S. M.; Arbabi, E.; Arbabi, A.; Horie, Y.; Faraji -Dana, M.; Faraon, A., Angle -multiplexed metasurfaces: encoding independent wavefronts in a single metasurface under different illumination angles. Physical Review X 2017, 7 (4), 041056

    2017

  23. [31]

    W.; Songhori, E.; Wang, S.; Lee, Y.-J.; Johnson, E.; Pathak, O.; Nova, A., A graph placement methodology for fast chip design

    Mirhoseini, A.; Goldie, A.; Yazgan, M.; Jiang, J. W.; Songhori, E.; Wang, S.; Lee, Y.-J.; Johnson, E.; Pathak, O.; Nova, A., A graph placement methodology for fast chip design. Nature 2021, 594 (7862), 207-212

    2021

  24. [32]

    -K.; Qiu, C.-W.; Wang, X

    Bao, Y.; Yu, Y.; Xu, H.; Guo, C.; Li, J.; Sun, S.; Zhou, Z. -K.; Qiu, C.-W.; Wang, X. -H., Full-colour nanoprint- hologram synchronous metasurface with arbitrary hue -saturation-brightness control. Light: Science & Applications 2019, 8 (1), 95

    2019

  25. [33]

    A.; Li, Y.; Zentgraf, T.; Mehmood, M

    Ahmed, H.; Ansari, M. A.; Li, Y.; Zentgraf, T.; Mehmood, M. Q.; Chen, X., Dynamic control of hybrid grafted perfect vector vortex beams. Nature Communications 2023, 14 (1), 3915

    2023

  26. [34]

    L.; Hasman, E., Photonic spin -controlled multifunctional shared-aperture antenna array

    Maguid, E.; Yulevich, I.; Veksler, D.; Kleine r, V.; Brongersma, M. L.; Hasman, E., Photonic spin -controlled multifunctional shared-aperture antenna array. Science 2016, 352 (6290), 1202-1206

    2016

  27. [35]

    S., The physics and applications of random lasers

    Wiersma, D. S., The physics and applications of random lasers. Nature Physics 2008, 4 (5), 359-367

    2008

  28. [36]

    A.; Zhang, S., Manipulating disordered plasmonic systems by external cavity with transition from broadband absorption to reconfigurable reflection

    Mao, P.; Liu, C.; Song, F.; Han, M.; Maier, S. A.; Zhang, S., Manipulating disordered plasmonic systems by external cavity with transition from broadband absorption to reconfigurable reflection. Nature Communications 2020, 11 (1), 1538

    2020

  29. [37]

    Nature Materials 2022, 21 (9), 1035-1041

    Vynck, K.; Pacanowski, R.; Agreda, A.; Dufay, A.; Granier, X.; Lalanne, P., The visual appearances of disordered optical metasurfaces. Nature Materials 2022, 21 (9), 1035-1041

    2022

  30. [38]

    M.; Poulikakos, D., T ransparent sunlight - activated antifogging metamaterials

    Haechler, I.; Ferru, N.; Schnoering, G.; Mitridis, E.; Schutzius, T. M.; Poulikakos, D., T ransparent sunlight - activated antifogging metamaterials. Nature Nanotechnology 2023, 18 (2), 137-144

    2023

  31. [39]

    Nature Reviews Materials 2021, 6 (3), 226-243

    Yu, S.; Qiu, C.-W.; Chong, Y.; Torquato, S.; Park, N., Engineered disorder in photonics. Nature Reviews Materials 2021, 6 (3), 226-243

    2021

  32. [40]

    K.; Turnalı, A.; Elahi, P.; Ilday, S.; Tokel, O.; Ilday, F

    Makey, G.; Yavuz, Ö.; Kesim, D. K.; Turnalı, A.; Elahi, P.; Ilday, S.; Tokel, O.; Ilday, F. Ö., Breaking crosstalk limits to dynamic holography using orthogonality of high -dimensional random vectors. Nature Photonics 2019, 13 (4), 251-256

    2019

  33. [41]

    -W.; Wang, J.-N.; Peng, R.; Lai, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, M., Breaking the limitation of polarization multiplexing in optical metasurfaces with engineered noise

    Xiong, B.; Liu, Y.; Xu, Y.; Deng, L.; Chen, C. -W.; Wang, J.-N.; Peng, R.; Lai, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, M., Breaking the limitation of polarization multiplexing in optical metasurfaces with engineered noise. Science 2023, 379 (6629), 294-299

    2023

  34. [42]

    Nature 2025, 1-7

    Qin, H.; Su, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Lv, W.; Yang, Z.; Chen, W.; Gao, X.; Wei, H.; Shi, Y.; Li, B., Disorder -assisted real– momentum topological photonic crystal. Nature 2025, 1-7

    2025

  35. [43]

    -g.; Song, G.; Lee, C.; Lee, C.; Jang, M., Reconstructive spectrometer using double -layer disordered metasurfaces

    Lee, D. -g.; Song, G.; Lee, C.; Lee, C.; Jang, M., Reconstructive spectrometer using double -layer disordered metasurfaces. Science Advances 2025, 11 (22), eadv2376

    2025

  36. [44]

    D.; Ord, J

    Cliff, A. D.; Ord, J. K., Spatial processes: models & applications. Pion Limited: 1981

    1981

  37. [45]

    C.; Su, V.-C.; Lai, Y.-C.; Hung Chu, C.; Chen, J.-W.; Lu, S.-H.; Chen, J.; Xu, B.; Kuan, C.-H., Broadband achromatic optical metasurface devices

    Wang, S.; Wu, P. C.; Su, V.-C.; Lai, Y.-C.; Hung Chu, C.; Chen, J.-W.; Lu, S.-H.; Chen, J.; Xu, B.; Kuan, C.-H., Broadband achromatic optical metasurface devices. Nature Communications 2017, 8 (1), 187

    2017

  38. [46]

    C.; Malek, S

    Overvig, A. C.; Malek, S. C.; Yu, N., Multifu nctional nonlocal metasurfaces. Physical Review Letters 2020, 125 (1), 017402

    2020

  39. [47]

    C.; Overvig, A

    Malek, S. C.; Overvig, A. C.; Alù, A.; Yu, N., Multifunctional resonant wavefront -shaping meta-optics based on multilayer and multi-perturbation nonlocal metasurfaces. Light: Science & Applications 2022, 11 (1), 246

    2022

  40. [48]

    V., Optical skyrmions and other topological quasiparticles of light

    Shen, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Shi, P.; Du, L.; Yuan, X.; Zayats, A. V., Optical skyrmions and other topological quasiparticles of light. Nature Photonics 2024, 18 (1), 15-25. 20 Figure 1 . Schematic illustration of a synthetic metasurface platform with substantially enhanced functional...

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.