Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Surface Plasmon Polariton Excitation in Time-modulated Media

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A sudden change in a metal's carrier mass can convert bound surface plasmons into radiated light and, in reverse, launch a plasmon from an incoming pulse.

desk verdict Solid ideal-step demonstration of SPP launching and outcoupling by time modulation; the 'experimentally viable' framing outruns the simulations. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.05126 v1 pith:2HU7UXR2 submitted 2025-07-07 physics.optics

T. V. Raziman , Marie Touboul , Riccardo Sapienza , Richard V. Craster , Francisco J. Rodríguez-Fortuño This is my paper
classification physics.optics PACS 73.20.Mf78.20.Ci42.25.Bs
keywords surfaceplasmonpolaritonstime-varyingmediatemporalinterfacetransparentconductingoxidesDrudemodeloutcouplingtimereflectionFDTDsimulation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that a step-like modulation of a Drude-like metal's carrier mass—an abrupt change of its plasma frequency—makes surface plasmon polaritons at a metal-air interface radiate into free space and, reciprocally, lets an incident light pulse create a surface plasmon. The authors show with finite-difference time-domain simulations that after the modulation, the old bound field decomposes into new modes of the same in-plane momentum at different frequencies; some of these have real out-of-plane momenta and leave as radiation, while others remain bound as a frequency-shifted plasmon and a time-reflected one. A magnetostatic 'frozen' mode appears at the interface to satisfy boundary conditions. If correct, this gives a mechanism to actively create, control, and extract plasmons in realistic transparent conducting oxides without spatial gratings or prisms.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a temporal interface in a Drude-like medium, modelled by a step change in the plasma frequency $\omega_p(t)$ via the carrier mass $m(t)$ in the equation of motion $m\,\partial_t v_i = q E_i - m\gamma v_i$. The paper integrates Maxwell's equations and the carrier equation across the temporal interface, so $H_y$, $E_x$, $E_z$, $v_x$, and $v_z$ are continuous at $t=0$, and it uses one-dimensional FDTD simulations in the $z$ direction with fixed $k_x$. The key identities are the Drude dispersion $\epsilon(\omega)=1-\omega_p^2/(\omega^2+i\gamma\omega)$ and conservation of in-plane momentum under spatial translation; together they determine which frequencies of the decomposed old field can propagate away and which remain bound. The magnetostatic zero-frequency branch of the bulk dispersion provides the frozen mode needed to match boundary conditions.

What would settle it

Simulate or measure the same interface with a plasma-frequency ramp that rises over tens of optical cycles instead of a step: if the out-coupled radiation and the launched surface plasmon disappear or drop drastically for rise times achievable in TCO pump-probe experiments, the central claim that step-like modulation excites and out-couples SPPs would be falsified for realistic systems.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a spatially uniform, abrupt change of the plasma frequency $\omega_p$ (achieved by changing the carrier mass $m(t)$) of a Drude metal is enough to break the momentum mismatch that normally keeps surface plasmon polaritons bound. Taking the in-plane momentum $k_x$ as conserved because of spatial translation symmetry, the paper argues that the instantaneous field profile of the old plasmon is no longer a monochromatic eigenmode of the new interface: its evanescent spatial distribution is decomposed into a spectrum of solutions at fixed $k_x$ and varied frequency $\omega$. Frequencies whose perpendicular momentum $k_z$ in air is real correspond to plane waves radiating away from the surface; frequencies that still satisfy the SPP dispersion of the modulated medium remain bound, with a forward and a backward (time-reflected) plasmon. The same logic in reverse launches an SPP when a pulse hits the interface at the moment of modulation. The paper verifies the spectral decomposition against the light line and the bulk metal dispersion and confirms that the generated frequencies follow the dispersion of the bounding media.

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes the modulation is an instantaneous, spatially uniform step change of the carrier mass in an otherwise ideal Drude metal; if the real pump-driven change in a transparent conducting oxide has a finite rise time, spatial gradients, or non-Drude dynamics, the predicted launching and outcoupling may not survive.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single abrupt modulation of a Drude metal can out-couple a bound surface plasmon into free-space radiation without any spatial grating or prism.
  • An incident light pulse that reaches the temporal interface at the right moment can be converted into a surface plasmon, providing dynamic launching of SPPs.
  • The frequencies of the radiated and bound waves are set by the SPP dispersion of the modulated medium, so the time interface acts as a dispersion-controlled frequency converter.
  • A magnetostatic frozen mode accompanies every time-modulated plasmon event, so time-varying plasmonic devices must account for a residual zero-frequency current at the interface.
  • The same time-interface mechanism can be applied to spoof surface plasmons and other surface waves in structured media, as the paper itself suggests.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: replacing the step with a ramp of finite rise time should reduce the efficiency of both outcoupling and launching; the degree of reduction as a function of rise time is a quantitative prediction that FDTD can test.
  • Beyond the paper: a periodic train of temporal interfaces would repeatedly convert the plasmon, potentially generating a frequency comb in the bound and radiated spectra.
  • Beyond the paper: pump-beam spatial nonuniformity breaks the exact conservation of in-plane momentum, which should broaden the radiation angles and soften the sharp light-line cutoff seen in the ideal step case.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses one-dimensional FDTD simulations of a TM-polarized air–Drude-metal interface to show that an abrupt step-like increase of the metal plasma frequency (from ωp0 to 1.5ωp0) can out-couple a bound surface plasmon into free-space radiation and can launch surface plasmons from an incident pulse. The generated bound-mode frequencies are compared with the analytic SPP dispersion of the modulated interface, and the radiation continuum is identified with the range between the light line and the bulk-metal dispersion. The paper also reports a time-reflected plasmon and a stationary 'magnetostatic' mode in the metal, and suggests extensions to spoof surface waves.

Significance. If correct, the paper establishes a qualitatively new SPP coupling mechanism: temporal momentum matching replaces spatial gratings or prisms, with the generated frequencies set by the dispersion of the bounding media. The paper's strength is internal consistency—the FDTD evolves the same Drude–Maxwell equations used to construct the dispersion branches, the spectral peaks align with the analytic branches, and no parameter fitting is involved. The claimed launching and out-coupling are specific, falsifiable predictions in the ideal-step model. The significant caveat is that the ideal instantaneous and spatially uniform mass step is not connected to realistic TCO parameters, so the experimental-viability claim is currently larger than the evidence.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract; Appendix Eqs. (A4)–(A8); 'Finite difference time domain simulations'] The central idealization is the instantaneous, spatially uniform mass step: the FDTD switches ωp from ωp0 to 1.5ωp0 in one time step, uniformly over the whole interface, and the Appendix explicitly assumes that modulation changes only m(t). Every quantitative claim of 'experimentally viable time-varying systems' in the Abstract and Conclusion rests on this idealization. In real TCO pump–probe experiments, the pump has a finite rise time (potentially many optical cycles), a finite spot size, and a nonzero collision rate γ. Because temporal-interface conversion is governed by the abruptness of the transition, a slow ramp may suppress both the out-coupling (Fig. 2) and the launching (Fig. 3), while a finite spot breaks the exact kx conservation on which the dispersion interpretation relies. The manuscript quotes none of the relevant parameters (γ, rise time, spot size, grid resolution) and reports no robustness study. I therefore consider the experimental-viability claim unsupported. The authors should either add simulations with finite rise time, finite spot, and realistic γ/ωp values, or explicitly restrict the claims to the ideal-step model.
  2. [Appendix, Eq. (A8)] The assumption that the modulation changes only the carrier mass m(t) is an ad hoc modeling choice that is not justified for TCOs. In transparent conducting oxides the all-optical permittivity change involves pump-induced carrier dynamics (density, temperature, and possibly collision rate) rather than a pure mass step. The generated-mode amplitudes, not just the frequencies, depend on the actual trajectory of the Drude parameters. If the authors intend the word 'realistic' in the Abstract to cover TCOs, they need to quote literature values for ωp, γ, and the modulation depth and rise time, and show that the ideal step is a faithful approximation. Otherwise the phrase should be softened to 'a dispersive Drude-like metal' as a minimal model.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Finite difference time domain simulations; Spectra] The simulation and spectral-analysis paragraphs give no numerical values for the grid step, time step, domain size, loss rate γ, or the Gaussian pulse widths in absolute units. Please include them so the results can be reproduced and the frequency axes validated quantitatively.
  2. [Fig. 2(b)] The time-reflected plasmon is identified by a negative-frequency peak. Please clarify whether this is a genuine physical mode with opposite phase velocity or an artifact of the one-sided Fourier transform.
  3. [Fig. 3(b) discussion] The sentence 'the original mode needs to decay into all three of these modes' is asserted without derivation; a short mode-counting argument or a reference to the Bakunov–Zhukov work would help the reader assess the magnetostatic-mode claim.
  4. [Fig. 2(a) discussion] The phrase 'the plasmon stops being a non-reflecting mode' is a double negative and should be rephrased, e.g., 'the plasmon becomes a radiating mode'.
  5. [Conclusion] The claim that metals do not support SPPs at microwave and terahertz frequencies because they behave as perfect electric conductors is too categorical; heavily doped semiconductors and graphene support SPP-like waves at THz. Please soften or qualify this statement.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the FDTD results are full-wave solutions of the stated Drude model, benchmarked against independent analytic dispersion branches rather than fitted to them.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained and non-circular. The input model is the Drude time-modulation system in the Appendix (Eqs. A1–A8), with the modulation taken as a step change in the carrier mass m(t) and hence in ωp(t). The FDTD simulations solve exactly those differential equations; they are not constructed to reproduce the analytic SPP dispersion relation by design. The claimed outputs—the frequency-shifted transmitted plasmon, the time-reflected plasmon, the radiation cutoffs, and the frozen magnetostatic mode—emerge from the time-stepping of Maxwell's equations and the Drude equation of motion, and are then compared with analytic eigenmode dispersion branches as an external benchmark (Figs. 2b and 2c). The comparison 'clearly follow the respective dispersion branches' is a verification step, not a fitted-input-called-prediction step: no simulation parameter is adjusted to make the FDTD peaks land on the analytic curves, and the 1.5ωp0 modulation step and pulse parameters are stated as chosen inputs rather than retrofitted outputs. The magnetostatic/frozen mode is presented as an observed consequence of the simulation and interpreted through modal decomposition at the temporal interface, with bulk-plasma trapping cited from independent prior work [19]; that citation is not load-bearing self-citation. The self-citations that do exist (e.g., refs. [8] and [16] include current authors) concern contextual background on space-time diffraction and polarization synthesis and do not carry the SPP-launching claim. The paper's main vulnerability is that the idealized instantaneous, spatially uniform mass step may not quantitatively represent a real TCO pump–probe experiment; that is a realism/correctness concern, not a circularity, because it questions whether the assumed input matches experiment rather than whether the output reduces to the input by definition. The reader's cited examples of circularity—parameter fitting, self-referential definitions, and renamed known results—are absent here. Score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard Maxwell-Drude physics plus one paper-specific modeling choice (mass-only modulation). No new physical entities are introduced; the magnetostatic mode is a known zero-frequency branch of the Drude model (prior work [19]). All listed free parameters are hand-chosen simulation inputs rather than fitted values.

free parameters (5)
  • Plasma frequency modulation ratio = 1.5 (omega_p after = 1.5 omega_p0)
    Hand-chosen step amplitude for the time modulation; the qualitative effect does not depend on this value.
  • Drude loss rate gamma = not reported
    The decay constant in the Drude permittivity (Eq. A7) is an input to the FDTD; the value is not given in the Letter or Appendix, affecting the linewidths and the field decay.
  • Plane-wave pulse in-plane momentum = kx = 0.7 omega_p0/c
    Chosen for the launching simulation in Fig. 1(b); not fitted to data.
  • Gaussian momentum width of the plasmon pulse = 0.3 k0 (sampling dkx = 0.01 k0)
    Chosen for the finite-width plasmon in Fig. 2; not fitted.
  • Gaussian kz distribution of the incident pulse = center 0.5 k0, width 0.1 k0
    Chosen to construct the plane-wave pulse in Fig. 1(b); not fitted.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Maxwell's equations in the air half-space (A1-A3)
    Unproved background used as the starting equations for the simulation.
  • domain assumption Drude model of the metal with dispersive permittivity epsilon(omega)=1-omega_p^2/(omega^2+i*gamma*omega) (A4-A7)
    Standard model for metals and TCOs; the paper adopts it without deriving it.
  • ad hoc to paper The time modulation changes only the carrier mass m(t)
    This modeling choice (stated in the Appendix) is specific to the paper and not a direct consequence of any measured TCO response.
  • standard math Continuity of Hy, Ex, Ez, vx, vz across the temporal interface
    Derived by integrating the differential equations across the interface; used to connect fields before and after the step.
  • domain assumption Spatial and temporal boundary conditions are directly compatible, avoiding spacetime-corner issues
    The paper asserts this compatibility in the Appendix; if it failed, the step-modulation problem would need the more careful treatment referenced in [36].
  • standard math Spatial translational invariance along x, so kx is conserved
    The system is invariant under x-translation because the modulation is spatially uniform; this justifies the exp(ikx x) ansatz and the 1D simulation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Surface Plasmon Polariton Excitation in Time-modulated Media." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2HU7UXR2

@misc{pith2026250705126,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Surface Plasmon Polariton Excitation in Time-modulated Media},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2HU7UXR2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.05126}
}
read the original abstract

Surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) are central to application areas such as sensing, energy harvesting, and nanoscale optics, and are typically excited via spatial structuring -- an approach lacking dynamic control. We demonstrate that step-like time modulation allows the excitation and out-coupling of SPPs through modulating a dispersive Drude-like metal thereby modelling realistic transparent conducting oxides; this establishes a pathway for the active control and extraction of plasmons in experimentally viable time-varying systems. Using finite-difference time-domain simulations we show that time modulation facilitates both the launching and radiation of surface plasmons with frequencies governed by the dispersion of the bounding media. Our results also reveal the generation of time-reflected waves and the emergence of a magnetostatic mode required for matching boundary conditions at the temporal interface.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.05126 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Optical Response by Time-Varying Plasmonic Nanoparticles

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2025-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A two-band effective polarizability for a time-modulated plasmonic nanosphere captures its localised surface plasmon and amplifying Floquet replica, predicting parametric amplification without gain media.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Galiffi, R

    E. Galiffi, R. Tirole, S. Yin, H. Li, S. Vezzoli, P. A. Huidobro, M. G. Silveirinha, R. Sapienza, A. Al` u, and J. B. Pendry, Photonics of time-varying media, Advanced Photonics 4, 014002 (2022)

    2022

  2. [2]

    Meinzer, W

    N. Meinzer, W. L. Barnes, and I. R. Hooper, Plasmonic meta-atoms and metasurfaces, Nature Photonics 8, 889 (2014)

    work page 2014

  3. [3]

    R. C. Devlin, A. Ambrosio, N. A. Rubin, J. P. B. Mueller, and F. Capasso, Arbitrary spin-to–orbital angular mo- mentum conversion of light, Science 358, 896 (2017)

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    Zheng, Q

    H. Zheng, Q. Liu, I. I. Kravchenko, X. Zhang, Y. Huo, and J. G. Valentine, Multichannel meta-imagers for accel- erating machine vision, Nature Nanotechnology 19, 471 (2024)

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    X. Ni, Z. J. Wong, M. Mrejen, Y. Wang, and X. Zhang, An ultrathin invisibility skin cloak for visible light, Sci- ence 349, 1310 (2015)

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    Y. Zhou, M. Z. Alam, M. Karimi, J. Upham, O. Reshef, C. Liu, A. E. Willner, and R. W. Boyd, Broadband fre- quency translation through time refraction in an epsilon- near-zero material, Nature Communications 11, 2180 (2020)

    2020

  7. [7]

    X. Guo, Y. Ding, Y. Duan, and X. Ni, Nonreciprocal metasurface with space–time phase modulation, Light: Science & Applications 8, 123 (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    A. C. Harwood, S. Vezzoli, T. V. Raziman, C. Hooper, R. Tirole, F. Wu, S. A. Maier, J. B. Pendry, S. A. R. Horsley, and R. Sapienza, Space-time optical diffraction from synthetic motion, Nature Communications 16, 5147 (2025)

    work page 2025

Show all 36 references
  1. [9]

    M. Z. Alam, I. De Leon, and R. W. Boyd, Large optical nonlinearity of indium tin oxide in its epsilon-near-zero region, Science 352, 795 (2016)

    2016

  2. [10]

    Jaffray, S

    W. Jaffray, S. Saha, V. M. Shalaev, A. Boltasseva, and M. Ferrera, Transparent conducting oxides: from all- dielectric plasmonics to a new paradigm in integrated photonics, Advances in Optics and Photonics 14, 148 (2022)

    2022

  3. [11]

    A. C. Valero, S. Gladyshev, D. Globosits, S. Rotter, E. A. Muljarov, and T. Weiss, Resonant states of structured photonic time crystals (2025)

    2025

  4. [12]

    G. T. Papadakis, M. Orenstein, E. Yablonovitch, and S. Fan, Thermodynamics of Light Management in Near- Field Thermophotovoltaics, Physical Review Applied 16, 064063 (2021)

    2021

  5. [13]

    J. B. Pendry, Negative Refraction Makes a Perfect Lens, Physical Review Letters 85, 3966 (2000)

    2000

  6. [14]

    J. S. Eismann, L. H. Nicholls, D. J. Roth, M. A. Alonso, P. Banzer, F. J. Rodr ´ ıguez-Fortu˜ no, A. V. Za- yats, F. Nori, and K. Y. Bliokh, Transverse spinning of unpolarized light, Nature Photonics 15, 156 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    L. H. Nicholls, F. J. Rodr ´ ıguez-Fortu˜ no, M. E. Nasir, R. M. C´ ordova-Castro, N. Olivier, G. A. Wurtz, and A. V. Zayats, Ultrafast synthesis and switching of light polarization in nonlinear anisotropic metamaterials, Na- ture Photonics 11, 628 (2017)

    2017

  8. [16]

    W. A. Challener, C. Peng, A. V. Itagi, D. Karns, W. Peng, Y. Peng, X. Yang, X. Zhu, N. J. Gokemei- jer, Y.-T. Hsia, G. Ju, R. E. Rottmayer, M. A. Seigler, and E. C. Gage, Heat-assisted magnetic recording by a near-field transducer with efficient optical energy trans- fer, Natu...

    2009

  9. [17]

    Galiffi, Y.-T

    E. Galiffi, Y.-T. Wang, Z. Lim, J. Pendry, A. Al` u, and P. A. Huidobro, Wood Anomalies and Surface-Wave Ex- citation with a Time Grating, Physical Review Letters 125, 127403 (2020)

    2020

  10. [18]

    M. I. Bakunov and S. N. Zhukov, Conversion of a surface electromagnetic wave at the boundary of a time-varying plasma, Plasma Physics Reports 22, 649 (1996)

    1996

  11. [19]

    M. I. Bakunov and S. N. Zhukov, Trapping of an elec- tromagnetic wave by the boundary of created plasma, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics 86, 696 (1998)

    1998

  12. [20]

    Shlivinski and Y

    A. Shlivinski and Y. Hadad, Universal transient radia- tion dynamics by abrupt and soft temporal transitions in optical waveguides, Nanophotonics 14, 785 (2025)

    2025

  13. [21]

    S. A. Maier, Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Applications (Springer US, New York, NY, 2007)

    2007

  14. [22]

    K. A. Willets and R. P. V. Duyne, Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Spectroscopy and Sensing, Annual Review of Physical Chemistry 58, 267 (2007)

    2007

  15. [23]

    K¨ uhn, U

    S. K¨ uhn, U. H ˚ akanson, L. Rogobete, and V. Sandogh- dar, Enhancement of Single-Molecule Fluorescence Using a Gold Nanoparticle as an Optical Nanoantenna, Physi- cal Review Letters 97, 017402 (2006)

    2006

  16. [24]

    K. R. Catchpole and A. Polman, Plasmonic solar cells, Optics Express 16, 21793 (2008)

    2008

  17. [25]

    J. T. Kim, J. J. Ju, S. Park, M.-S. Kim, S. K. Park, and M.-H. Lee, Chip-to-chip optical interconnect using gold long-range surface plasmon polariton waveguides, Optics Express 16, 13133 (2008)

    2008

  18. [26]

    Thangamuthu, T

    M. Thangamuthu, T. V. Raziman, O. J. F. Martin, and J. Tang, Review—Origin and Promotional Effects of Plasmonics in Photocatalysis, Journal of The Electro- chemical Society 169, 036512 (2022)

    2022

  19. [27]

    Aftab, M

    M. Aftab, M. S. Mansha, T. Iqbal, and M. Farooq, Sur- face Plasmon Excitation: Theory, Configurations, and Applications, Plasmonics 19, 1701 (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    G. P. Agrawal, Space–Time Duality in Optics: Its Origin and Applications, Photonics 12, 611 (2025)

    2025

  21. [29]

    J. T. Mendon¸ ca and P. K. Shukla, Time Refraction and Time Reflection: Two Basic Concepts, Physica Scripta 65, 160 (2002)

    2002

  22. [30]

    See Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher] for animations of wave evolution due to time modulation

  23. [31]

    Liberal, A

    I. Liberal, A. Ganfornina-Andrades, and J. E. V´ azquez-Lozano, Spatiotemporal Symmetries and Energy-Momentum Conservation in Uniform Spacetime Metamaterials, ACS Photonics 11, 5273 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    Zhang, W

    J. Zhang, W. Donaldson, and G. P. Agrawal, Conserva- tion law for electromagnetic fields in a space-time-varying medium and its implications, Physical Review A 110, 043526 (2024)

    2024

  25. [33]

    J. B. Pendry, L. Mart ´ ın-Moreno, and F. J. Garcia-Vidal, Mimicking surface plasmons with structured surfaces, Science 305, 847 (2004)

    2004

  26. [34]

    Christensen, Z

    J. Christensen, Z. Liang, and M. Willatzen, Minimal model for spoof acoustoelastic surface states, AIP Ad- vances 4, 124301 (2014)

    2014

  27. [35]

    Pham and A

    K. Pham and A. Maurel, How space-time modulations modify spoof surface plasmons and scattering properties in acoustic metagratings, Physical Review B 108, 024303 (2023)

    2023

  28. [36]

    Bahrami, K

    A. Bahrami, K. D. Kinder, Z. Li, and C. Caloz, Space- time wedges, Nanophotonics 10.1515/nanoph-2024-0526 (2025). 6 Appendix: Theoretical model —We consider transverse magnetic (TM) polarised waves with magnetic field Hy ˆy, with the interface between air ( z ≥ 0) and the meta...

    2025 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.