Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 31 references

Stereo Reproduction in the Presence of Sample Rate Offsets

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Clock skew between wireless speakers can be fixed by audio-domain resampling rather than network synchronization, and the fix preserves binaural cues.

desk verdict A clean proof-of-concept for audio-domain SRO compensation in stereo reproduction, with the practical claim limited by an oracle RTF and missing error bars. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.05402 v2 pith:6K4F4UF5 submitted 2025-07-07 eess.AS cs.SD

Srikanth Korse , Andreas Walther , Emanuel A. P. Habets This is my paper · ORCID
classification eess.AScs.SD
keywords samplerateoffsetclockskewstereoreproductionspatialaudiobinauralcuesbeamformingcoherencedriftwirelessloudspeakers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes that sample rate offsets between wirelessly connected loudspeakers degrade stereo reproduction by drifting the phase of each loudspeaker's contribution, and that this degradation can be largely removed in the audio domain without network-level clock synchronization. The proposed system uses a microphone array at the primary device to spatially isolate each loudspeaker's signal, estimates each offset with the DWACD coherence-drift algorithm, and resamples the playback stream before transmission. Objective ITD and IC difference plots, together with a MUSHRA listening test with 11 listeners, show that the compensation preserves binaural cues and significantly reduces perceived degradation, though it does not fully eliminate it.

What carries the argument

The central object is the SRO phase term $\Lambda_q[k,l]$, a time- and frequency-dependent complex exponential that multiplies each loudspeaker's playback signal in the short-time Fourier domain. Compensation works by estimating the SRO $\epsilon_q$ and resampling so that the inverse phase term cancels $\Lambda_q$; the estimation chain is an LCMV beamformer (with diagonal loading for numerical stability) that isolates each loudspeaker's contribution, followed by the DWACD algorithm, which computes the complex coherence between beamformer output and reference signal, takes the conjugate product over a temporal distance $L$, and finds the lag maximizing the generalized cross-correlation with a golden-section refinement.

What would settle it

Run the identical pipeline with an estimated RTF (for example, obtained from a single-source initialization frame with the same PSD estimator) instead of the oracle RTF of Eq. (19), in the simulated 7 m by 7 m by 6 m room with RT60 = 0.3 s and SROs (10, -100) ppm. If the estimated SRO trace deviates from ground truth by more than the smoothing tolerance, or the MUSHRA score for the compensation condition falls to within statistical noise of the uncompensated condition, the central claim that audio-domain SRO compensation preserves binaural cues fails in realistic conditions.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Clock skew between two wireless loudspeakers appears in the binaural signal as a per-source phase term $\Lambda_q[k,l] = \exp\left(-j\frac{2\pi k}{N_w}\frac{l N_h \epsilon_q}{f_s}\right)$ that decorrelates the two channels over time, destroying interaural coherence and shifting interaural time difference. The paper shows that if each loudspeaker's contribution is first separated by an LCMV spatial filter using an oracle relative transfer function, the DWACD algorithm can estimate the underlying SRO accurately, and resampling the playback signal by the inverse phase term $\Lambda_q^{-1}$ before transmission restores the no-SRO binaural cues at low and mid frequencies. In the MUSHRA test, the compensation condition scores well above the uncompensated condition and close to the hidden reference, establishing that audio-domain resampling is a viable substitute for explicit clock synchronization in stereo reproduction.

Load-bearing premise

The entire chain assumes the relative transfer function of each loudspeaker is known exactly (an oracle RTF computed from the true PSD matrix during a single-source initialization); if that RTF is imperfect in a real deployment, the beamformer will not isolate the loudspeaker contributions and the SRO estimate will degrade.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Wireless loudspeaker systems can retain spatial fidelity without relying on PTP/NTP-style clock alignment, because compensation happens on the audio signal itself.
  • Offsets up to at least $\pm 100$ ppm can be estimated robustly within about two minutes of audio, as shown in the estimation plots.
  • Perceived quality loss from SRO is reduced to a level close to the hidden reference in the MUSHRA listening test.
  • Binaural cues (ITD and IC) are preserved at low and mid frequencies, with high-frequency residuals smaller but not perfectly removed.
  • The method is source-agnostic: evaluation used Gaussian noise for objective cues and musical items for the listening test.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A straightforward extension would apply the same estimate-and-resample loop to more than two loudspeakers, provided the RTF matrix has linearly independent columns so the LCMV beamformer can separate them.
  • Because the paper assumes the primary device's own SRO $\epsilon_0$ is known, a practical deployment would need joint estimation of both $\epsilon_0$ and $\epsilon_q$, perhaps through alternating updates; this is my inference, not the paper's claim.
  • The reported frequency dependence — full compensation at low and mid frequencies but not at high frequencies — suggests that residual high-frequency cue error is the next target, and a sub-sample delay refinement or multi-band approach may close the gap.
  • An online, non-oracle RTF estimator could be tested on the same simulated room and SRO configurations, turning the method into a fully blind system that does not require a single-source initialization phase.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper models the effect of sample rate offsets (SROs) in a two-loudspeaker wireless stereo reproduction system: the binaural signal is written with a phase drift term Λ_q (Eq. 3), and the microphone array at the primary device captures the same SRO-affected playback (Eq. 8). The proposed pipeline applies an LCMV beamformer (Eq. 18) using an oracle relative transfer function matrix (Eq. 19) to extract each loudspeaker contribution, estimates the SRO with the DWACD algorithm (Eqs. 22-26), and resamples the playback signal before transmission to compensate. The method is evaluated in a simulated room with three SRO configurations using objective binaural-cue difference plots (ITD and IC, Fig. 3), SRO tracking plots (Fig. 4), and a MUSHRA test with 11 listeners (Fig. 5).

Significance. If the results hold, this is a useful demonstration that audio-domain SRO compensation can preserve ITD and IC and reduce perceptual degradation without explicit clock synchronization, an underexplored problem in spatial audio reproduction. The paper's strengths are its clear formulation, use of a published DWACD estimator as a black box, and evaluation against ground truth, with no parameter fitting to force the outcome. However, the practical significance is currently limited by two idealized assumptions—oracle RTFs and a known primary-device SRO—and by the absence of error bars and statistical tests; the central claim is therefore defensible only as a controlled proof-of-concept.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3.2, Eq. (19)] The central validation uses an oracle RTF computed from the true PSD during a single-source initialization. In a real deployment, the RTF would be estimated from finite data, and any error propagates into the beamformer output \hat{Z}_q, leaving interference leakage that biases the coherence phase used by DWACD (Eq. 22) and hence the SRO estimate (Eq. 26). The paper presents no sensitivity analysis and no experiment with a non-oracle RTF estimator (e.g., the methods of [21] or [22]); consequently, Fig. 3 and Fig. 5 support the compensation concept only under idealized RTFs. Please add an experiment with estimated RTFs, or at minimum a perturbation analysis of Eq. (19), and report its effect on SRO accuracy and on the ITD/IC metrics.
  2. [Sec. 3.1, Eq. (7)] The method requires the primary-device SRO ε0 to be known in order to recover the loudspeaker SRO ε_q from the estimated \bar{ε}_q, but the experiments never state the value of ε0 or test robustness to its mismatch. The SRO configurations in Section 4 are described as being 'on the microphone signal', so it is unclear whether the simulated values are ε_q or \bar{ε}_q. Please state the assumed ε0, validate the recovery ε_q = \bar{ε}_q − ε0, and test at least one nonzero ε0 setting.
  3. [Sec. 4, Figs. 4 and 5] The perceptual claim that the method 'significantly reduces' degradation is not supported by statistical evidence. Figure 5 shows MUSHRA results for only 11 listeners with no confidence intervals or pairwise significance tests, and Figure 4 plots SRO estimates averaged over seven files without variance. Please add error bars and statistical tests (e.g., Wilcoxon signed-rank for the MUSHRA scores and standard-deviation bands in Fig. 4), or soften the claim to a qualitative demonstration.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 3.2, Eq. (15)] In the sentence after Eq. (15), 'Ideally, \hat{Z}_q[k,l] ≈ h_{0,q} Λ_q[k,l] X_q[k,l] + v' is dimensionally inconsistent because h_{0,q} is an M×1 vector while \hat{Z}_q is a scalar; this should be H_{0,q,0} (the reference-microphone transfer function) to be dimensionally correct.
  2. [Eqs. (19)-(21)] The notation in Eqs. (19)-(21) does not consistently show the STFT frame index l; \bar{Φ}_q and \bar{z}_q should be written as \bar{Φ}_q[k,l] and \bar{z}_q[k,l] to clarify that the expectation in Eq. (20) is taken over frames or segments.
  3. [Sec. 4] The window size N_w used in the STFT analysis is never stated in the experiments; please report N_w together with the already stated hop size N_h and smoothing factors.
  4. [Fig. 3 caption] The color or line-style mapping of the three rows (no compensation, oracle compensation, oracle-RTF compensation) is described only in the caption, not in the figure itself; please add labels or a legend inside the figure.
  5. [References] The reference list contains several OCR artifacts (e.g., 'T ime-V arying' in [11] and 'V eering' in [16]); please harmonize the bibliographic formatting.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No load-bearing circularity: the oracle RTF is an acknowledged idealization, not a fitted input, and the SRO estimate comes from an external DWACD algorithm; only minor non-load-bearing self-citations appear.

full rationale

The derivation is self-contained in the relevant sense. Eq. (19) defines the oracle RTF as the true PSD ratio of the SRO-affected single-source component; this is an explicit idealization (“Since the RTF estimation is not the main focus of the paper, in the current study, we use an oracle RTF”), not a parameter fitted to the binaural-cue outcome. The beamformer output in Eq. (15) then feeds the external DWACD estimator (Eqs. 22–26), whose SRO estimate is compared against ground truth in Fig. 4 and used to resample the playback signal. Nothing in the chain makes the predicted ITD/IC preservation or MUSHRA result equal to an input by construction: the oracle RTF supplies the true spatial response during a single-source initialization, and the compensation is assessed against ground-truth SRO and no-SRO references. The self-citations ([15], [19], [23]) are background or alternative-method citations and are not load-bearing; no uniqueness claim or ansatz is imported from them. The acknowledged assumptions (known ǫ0, single-source initialization, exclusion of latency and coding) are limitations and robustness risks, not circular steps. The low non-zero score reflects only the presence of minor non-load-bearing self-citations.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on two strong idealizations: an oracle RTF and known primary-device SRO. The method parameters are chosen by hand and not swept for sensitivity.

free parameters (6)
  • Diagonal loading constant alpha = 1e-6
    Added to the inverse term in the LCMV beamformer (Eq. 18) to ensure numerical stability; chosen without sensitivity analysis.
  • Smoothing factor alpha_s = 0.95
    Used in recursive averaging of the phase function in DWACD (Eq. 24); a hand-chosen value.
  • Hop size N_h = 2048 samples
    Set in the experimental setup for STFT and SRO estimation; affects the temporal resolution of the phase drift.
  • Segment length for SRO simulation = 8192 samples
    Used in the STFT-based SRO simulation method [25]; taken from prior work [11].
  • Energy-based activity threshold = not specified
    Used to detect signal activity for coherence estimation in DWACD; the paper gives no value or method.
  • Temporal smoothing factor for estimated SRO = not specified
    Applied to the estimated SRO to avoid fluctuations; the exact factor is not reported.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math STFT-based SRO approximation Lambda_q[k,l] = exp(-j2*pi*k/N_w * l*N_h*epsilon_q/f_s)
    Taken from [7], [8]; assumes small SRO and window long enough that l*N_h*epsilon_q/f_s << N_w.
  • domain assumption Constant SRO during the experiment
    The paper states 'we assume epsilon_q is constant' in Section 2, ignoring time-varying skew.
  • domain assumption Primary device SRO epsilon_0 is known a priori
    Section 3.1: 'we assume that epsilon_0 is known a priori to estimate epsilon_q from epsilon_bar_q.' This is needed to separate epsilon_q from the combined offset.
  • domain assumption Oracle RTF available from single-source initialization
    Section 3.2, Eq. 19: the RTF is computed from the true PSD of the SRO-affected signal, requiring a phase with only the q-th loudspeaker active.
  • domain assumption No latency, coding, or frame errors in transmission
    Section 2 explicitly lists these as ignored factors, which are common in wireless audio.
  • domain assumption Noise PSD matrix Phi_v = I
    Section 3.2 sets the sensor noise covariance to identity for the LCMV solution, which is a simplification.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Stereo Reproduction in the Presence of Sample Rate Offsets." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6K4F4UF5

@misc{pith2026250705402,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Stereo Reproduction in the Presence of Sample Rate Offsets},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6K4F4UF5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.05402}
}
read the original abstract

One of the main challenges in synchronizing wirelessly connected loudspeakers for spatial audio reproduction is clock skew. Clock skew arises from sample rate offsets ( SROs) between the loudspeakers, caused by the use of independent device clocks. While network-based protocols like Precision Time Protocol (PTP) and Network Time Protocol (NTP) are explored, the impact of SROs on spatial audio reproduction and its perceptual consequences remains underexplored. We propose an audio-domain SRO compensation method using spatial filtering to isolate loudspeaker contributions. These filtered signals, along with the original playback signal, are used to estimate the SROs, and their influence is compensated for prior to spatial audio reproduction. We evaluate the effect of the compensation method in a subjective listening test. The results of these tests as well as objective metrics demonstrate that the proposed method mitigates the perceptual degradation introduced by SROs by preserving the spatial cues.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.05402 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Stereo reproduction using two devices, each consisting only of a loudspeaker (q ∈ 1, 2), wirelessly connected to a primary device that consists only of a microphone array (q=0). 2. STEREO REPRODUCTION AMID SROs Consider a room with three devices and a listener, as shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [15]

    Sample Rate Offset Compensated Acoustic Echo Cancellation for Multi-Device S cenar- ios,

    S. Korse, O. Thiergart, and E. A. P . Habets, “Sample Rate Offset Compensated Acoustic Echo Cancellation for Multi-Device S cenar- ios,” in 18th International W orkshop on Acoustic Signal Enhancemen t (IWAENC), 2024, pp. 1–5

    work page 2024

  2. [21]

    A minimum distortion noise reduction algorithm with multiple microphones,

    J. Chen, J. Benesty, and Y . Huang, “A minimum distortion noise reduction algorithm with multiple microphones,” IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing , vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 481–493, March 2008. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.iee e.org/document/ 4431805

    work page 2008

  3. [22]

    Multichannel ei genspace beamforming in a reverberant noisy environment with multip le interfering speech signals,

    S. Markovich, S. Gannot, and I. Cohen, “Multichannel ei genspace beamforming in a reverberant noisy environment with multip le interfering speech signals,” IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing , vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 1071–1086, August 2009. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4814760

    work page arXiv 2009

  4. [1]

    Rumsey, Spatial Audio , ser

    F. Rumsey, Spatial Audio , ser. Music Technology Series. Taylor & Francis, 2001. [Online]. Available: https://www.taylor francis.com/ books/mono/10.4324/9780080498195/spatial-audio-francis-rumsey

    work page doi:10.4324/9780080498195/spatial-audio-francis-rumsey 2001

  5. [2]

    Roginska and P

    A. Roginska and P . Geluso, Eds., Immersive Sound: The Art and Science of Binaural and Multi-Channel Audio , ser. Audio Engineering Society Presents. Routledge, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/bo oks/edit/10.4324/ 9781315707525/immersive-sound-agnieszka-roginska-pa ul-geluso

    work page 2017

  6. [3]

    IEEE 1588-2008, July 2008

    IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Society, IEEE Standard for a Precision Clock Synchronization Protocol for Network ed Measurement and Control Systems , Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Std. IEEE 1588-2008, July 2008. [Onl ine]. Available: https://standards.ieee.org/standard/1588-2008.html

    work page 2008

  7. [4]

    Network Ti me Protocol V ersion 4: Protocol and Algorithms Specification,

    D. Mills, J. Martin, J. Burbank, and W. Kasch, “Network Ti me Protocol V ersion 4: Protocol and Algorithms Specification, ” Request for Comments 5905, June 2010. [Online]. Available: https:/ /datatracker. ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5905

    work page 2010

  8. [5]

    Method and system for time synchronizing multiple loudspeakers,

    M. Culbert and A. Lindahl, “Method and system for time synchronizing multiple loudspeakers,” Patent US20 060 067 536A1, March 30, 2006. [Online]. Available: https://patents.goo gle.com/patent/ US20060067536A1/en

    work page 2006

Show all 31 references
  1. [6]

    Synchronization of Streamed A udio Between Multiple Playback Devices Over an Unmanaged IP Netw ork,

    C. Lauri and J. Malmgren, “Synchronization of Streamed A udio Between Multiple Playback Devices Over an Unmanaged IP Netw ork,” Master’s thesis, Lund University, October 2015. [Online]. Available: https://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/8052964/file/8052965.pdf

    2015

  2. [7]

    Blind samp ling rate offset estimation and compensation in wireless acoustic se nsor networks with application to beamforming,

    S. Markovich-Golan, S. Gannot, and I. Cohen, “Blind samp ling rate offset estimation and compensation in wireless acoustic se nsor networks with application to beamforming,” in International W orkshop on Acous- tic Signal Enhancement , 2012, pp. 1–4

    2012

  3. [8]

    Correlation maximization-based s ampling rate offset estimation for distributed microphone arrays,

    L. Wang and S. Doclo, “Correlation maximization-based s ampling rate offset estimation for distributed microphone arrays, ” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing , vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 571–582, 2016

    2016

  4. [9]

    Multi-stage coherence drift based sampli ng rate synchronization for acoustic beamforming,

    J. Schmalenstroeer, J. Heymann, L. Drude, C. Boeddecker , and R. Haeb-Umbach, “Multi-stage coherence drift based sampli ng rate synchronization for acoustic beamforming,” in IEEE 19th International W orkshop on Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP) . Luton: IEEE, Oct. 2017, pp. ...

    2017

  5. [10]

    Online Estimation of Sampling Rate Offsets in Wireless Acoustic Se nsor Networks with Packet Loss,

    A. Chinaev, G. Enzner, T. Gburrek, and J. Schmalenstroe er, “Online Estimation of Sampling Rate Offsets in Wireless Acoustic Se nsor Networks with Packet Loss,” in 29th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO). Dublin, Ireland: IEEE, Aug. 2021, pp. 1110–

    2021

  6. [11]

    O n Synchronization of Wireless Acoustic Sensor Networks in th e Presence of Time-V arying Sampling Rate Offsets and Speaker Changes,

    T. Gburrek, J. Schmalenstroeer, and R. Haeb-Umbach, “O n Synchronization of Wireless Acoustic Sensor Networks in th e Presence of Time-V arying Sampling Rate Offsets and Speaker Changes, ” in IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal P rocessing (ICASSP). S...

    2022

  7. [12]

    Adaptive Sampling Rat e Correction for Acoustic Echo Control in V oice-Over-IP,

    M. Pawig, G. Enzner, and P . V ary, “Adaptive Sampling Rat e Correction for Acoustic Echo Control in V oice-Over-IP,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing , vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 189–199, Jan. 2010. [Online]. Available: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5170064/

    2010

  8. [13]

    Frequency domain acoustic ec ho canceller that handles asynchronous A/D and D/A clocks,

    M. Abe and M. Nishiguchi, “Frequency domain acoustic ec ho canceller that handles asynchronous A/D and D/A clocks,” in IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICA SSP). Florence, Italy: IEEE, May 2014, pp. 5924–5928. [Online]. A vailable: http...

    2014

  9. [14]

    Clock Skew Robust Acoustic Echo Cancella tion,

    K. Helwani, E. Soltanmohammadi, M. M. Goodwin, and A. Krishnaswamy, “Clock Skew Robust Acoustic Echo Cancella tion,” in Interspeech 2022 . ISCA, Sep. 2022, pp. 2533–2537. [Online]. Available: https://www.isca-speech.org/arch ive/interspeech 2022/helwani22 interspeech.html

    2022

  10. [16]

    Beamforming: A versatil e approach to spatial filtering,

    B. D. V . V een and K. M. Buckley, “Beamforming: A versatil e approach to spatial filtering,” IEEE ASSP Magazine , vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 4–24,

  11. [17]

    H. L. V . Trees, Optimum Array Processing: Part IV of Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory . Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley- Interscience, 2002. [Online]. Available: https://online library.wiley.com/ doi/book/10.1002/0471221104

    2002 doi

  12. [18]

    An algorithm for linearly constrained ada ptive array processing,

    O. L. F. III, “An algorithm for linearly constrained ada ptive array processing,” Proceedings of the IEEE , vol. 60, no. 8, pp. 926–935, August 1972. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ie ee.org/document/ 1451993

    1972

  13. [19]

    On the numerical ins tability of an lcmv beamformer for a uniform linear array,

    S. Chakrabarty and E. A. P . Habets, “On the numerical ins tability of an lcmv beamformer for a uniform linear array,” IEEE Signal Processing Letters, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 272–276, Feb 2016. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7355407

    2016

  14. [20]

    C. M. Bishop, Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning . New Y ork, NY , USA: Springer, 2006. [Online]. Avail- able: https://books.google.com/books/about/Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning.html?id=kTNoQgAACAAJ

    2006

  15. [23]

    Relative transfer funct ion estimation exploiting instantaneous signals and the signa l subspace,

    M. Taseska and E. A. P . Habets, “Relative transfer funct ion estimation exploiting instantaneous signals and the signa l subspace,” in Proceedings of the 23rd European Signal Processing Confere nce (EUSIPCO), Nice, France, August 2015, pp. 404–408. [Online]. Available: https:...

    2015

  16. [24]

    Pyroomacou stics: A python package for audio room simulation and array processing algo rithms,

    R. Scheibler, E. Bezzam, and I. Dokmani´ c, “Pyroomacou stics: A python package for audio room simulation and array processing algo rithms,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoust ics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) , 2018, pp. 351–355. [Online]. ...

    2018

  17. [25]

    Efficient samp ling rate offset compensation - an overlap-save based approach,

    J. Schmalenstroeer and R. Haeb-Umbach, “Efficient samp ling rate offset compensation - an overlap-save based approach,” in 26th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO) , 2018, pp. 499–503

    2018

  18. [26]

    A probabilisti c model for robust localization based on a binaural auditory front- end,

    T. May, S. van de Par, and A. Kohlrausch, “A probabilisti c model for robust localization based on a binaural auditory front- end,” IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing , vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2011

    2011

  19. [27]

    Amt 1.x: A toolbox for reproducible research in auditory modeli ng,

    Majdak, Piotr, Hollomey, Clara, and Baumgartner, Robe rt, “Amt 1.x: A toolbox for reproducible research in auditory modeli ng,” Acta Acust. , vol. 6, p. 19, 2022. [Online]. Available: https: //doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2022011

    2022

  20. [28]

    ITU-R BS.1534-3, October 2015

    International Telecommunication Union, ITU-R BS.1534-3: Method for the subjective assessment of intermediate quality leve l of audio systems, Std. ITU-R BS.1534-3, October 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.itu.int/rec/R-REC-BS.1534-3-201510-I/en

    2015

  21. [29]

    An impulse response dataset for dynamic data-based auralisation of advanced sound systems ,

    C. Pike and M. Romanov, “An impulse response dataset for dynamic data-based auralisation of advanced sound systems ,” in Proceedings of the 142nd Audio Engineering Society Convent ion, Berlin, Germany, May 2017, engineering Brief 334. [Online] . Available: https://www.aes.org/...

    2017

  22. [1114]

    Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9616037/

    [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9616037/

  23. [1988]

    Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org /document/665

    [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org /document/665

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.