pith. sign in

arxiv: 2507.06284 · v2 · submitted 2025-07-08 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Before its time: a remarkably evolved protocluster core at z=7.88

Callum Witten , Pascal A. Oesch , William McClymont , Romain A. Meyer , Yoshinobu Fudamoto , Debora Sijacki , Nicolas Laporte , Jake S. Bennett
show 6 more authors
Charlotte Simmonds Emma Giovinazzo A. Lola Danhaive Laure Ciesla Cristian Carvajal-Bohorquez Maxime Trebitsch
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 05:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords protoclustershigh-redshift galaxiesgalaxy evolutionJWSTstellar massdust attenuationstar formation historyneutral hydrogen
0
0 comments X

The pith

The A2744-z7p9OD protocluster at z=7.88 hosts the most extreme overdensity of evolved galaxies yet seen, with a dusty massive core and bursty outskirts.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents JWST NIRCam data on the A2744-z7p9OD system, identifying seven new member galaxies and raising the total to 23 with a combined stellar mass exceeding 10 billion solar masses. These galaxies at only 650 million years after the Big Bang show redder UV slopes, stronger Balmer breaks, and higher dust attenuation than typical field galaxies at the same epoch. SED fitting with PROSPECTOR reveals a clear split: the core consists of dusty massive galaxies in a synchronized lulling phase, while the outskirts host recent star-formation bursts. Many members also display strong continuum suppression blueward of Ly-alpha, indicating neutral hydrogen columns above 10^22.5 cm^-2. The authors conclude that this is the most evolved protocluster known above redshift 7, demonstrating that local environment already shapes galaxy properties at the earliest observable times.

Core claim

The A2744-z7p9OD protocluster at z=7.88 is the most extreme, evolved overdensity yet observed at z>7. Its 23 galaxies possess higher stellar masses, gas densities, and dust attenuation than field galaxies, with the core populated by dusty massive systems undergoing a lulling phase and the outskirts showing recent star-formation bursts, plus extreme neutral hydrogen columns in many members.

What carries the argument

PROSPECTOR spectral energy distribution fitting of JWST NIRCam photometry, which separates core and outskirts populations by star-formation history, dust content, and Balmer-break strength.

If this is right

  • Environmental effects on galaxy growth operate by 650 Myr after the Big Bang, producing synchronized evolution inside the densest regions.
  • Protocluster cores accumulate dust and gas faster than the field, leading to stronger attenuation and suppressed star formation at early times.
  • The total stellar mass already exceeds 10^10 solar masses, implying rapid assembly of cluster-scale systems well before z=6.
  • High neutral hydrogen columns suggest these galaxies may be difficult to observe in Lyman-alpha emission despite active star formation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Such extreme overdensities may mark the sites where the first massive quiescent galaxies form, testable with deeper rest-frame optical spectroscopy.
  • The observed core-outskirts dichotomy offers a direct probe of how large-scale structure influences the timing of star-formation quenching.
  • If similar systems are common, current field-galaxy surveys at z>7 may under-estimate the average stellar mass and dust content of the early universe.

Load-bearing premise

The seven newly identified galaxies are true physical members of the z=7.88 overdensity rather than chance projections or lower-redshift interlopers.

What would settle it

Spectroscopic redshifts for the seven new candidates; a significant fraction lying at z less than 7 would reduce the reported overdensity mass and evolution metrics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.06284 by A. Lola Danhaive, Callum Witten, Charlotte Simmonds, Cristian Carvajal-Bohorquez, Debora Sijacki, Emma Giovinazzo, Jake S. Bennett, Laure Ciesla, Maxime Trebitsch, Nicolas Laporte, Pascal A. Oesch, Romain A. Meyer, William McClymont, Yoshinobu Fudamoto.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: An RGB image using the F090W, F277W and F444W filters, with overlaid points indicating the positions of spectroscopically confirmed galaxies (squares, solid line) and photometric candidates (circles). The dashed, large squares indicate the most clustered core regions. The left square includes four PRGs, while the right square contains seven PRGs, these objects compose the “core” regions (as defined in Sect… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The UV continuum slopes of our sample (red squares) as a func￾tion of UV magnitude. We calculate the UV-slope by fitting the photo￾metric fluxes in the filters covering the wavelength range of 0.13µm < λrest < 0.31µm with a power-law. We compare these to literature values of field galaxies (FGs) measured from photometry (Austin et al. 2024, black stars) and stacked spectroscopy (Roberts-Borsani et al. 2024… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The ratio of the flux observed in the F115W filter to the expected F115W from our PROSPECTOR SED-fitting, described in Section 5. The data points are colour coded by the inferred neutral hydrogen column density, discussed in Section 5. We note here the one circular data point is simultaneously a strong LAE and DLA, and hence we utilise the spec￾troscopically measured NHI from Witten et al. (in prep.). The … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Two candidate (mini-)quenched galaxies in the protocluster, exhibiting strong Balmer breaks and very weak emission lines. Their model spectra and photometry (blue line and circles) and observed pho￾tometry (red squares) are shown in the left-hand panels, while their best￾fit SFH (blue line) and associated uncertainty (shaded blue region) from PROSPECTOR are shown in the right-hand panels. The SFHs of these… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: A mapping of the properties of PRGs onto the RGB image of the protocluster, as seen in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The star-formation histories of galaxies resident within the most clustered regions of the protocluster, “core” galaxies (top panel), com￾pared to those in the more sparsely populated regions, “non-core” galax￾ies (bottom panel). The SFHs of each galaxy are indicated by a coloured line. We indicate the median star-formation rate in each time bin with the black line and the associated MC error shaded in gre… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Protoclusters represent the most extreme environments in the very early Universe. They form from large-scale dark matter overdensities, harbouring an overabundance of galaxies fed by large gas reservoirs. Their early and accelerated evolution results in a distinct difference in the properties of galaxies resident in protoclusters versus the field, which is known to be in place by $z\sim 5-6$. We utilise JWST NIRCam observations of the A2744-z7p9OD protocluster at $z=7.88$ to constrain the properties of resident galaxies. We identify seven new protocluster members, bringing the total number to 23 and the total stellar mass of the protocluster to in excess of $10^{10}\ \rm{M_{\odot}}$. These galaxies are remarkably evolved just 650 Myr after the Big Bang, preferentially showing redder UV-slopes and stronger Balmer breaks than is typical of field galaxies. We use the PROSPECTOR spectral energy distribution fitting code to derive key galaxy properties, finding distinct populations in the core versus the outskirts of the protocluster. The core is largely composed of dusty, massive galaxies which can be characterised as undergoing a synchronised lulling phase, while galaxies in the protocluster outskirts are undergoing recent bursts of star formation. Finally, a strong suppression of the continuum around the Ly$\alpha$-break evidences extreme neutral hydrogen column densities in many resident galaxies ($N_{\rm HI}\gtrsim10^{22.5}\ {\rm cm^{-2}}$). The A2744-z7p9OD system is the most extreme, evolved overdensity yet observed at $z>7$, with higher stellar masses, gas densities, and dust attenuation, revealing the intersection of local environment and high-redshift galaxy formation at their extremes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports JWST NIRCam observations of the A2744-z7p9OD protocluster at z=7.88. It identifies seven new member galaxies (bringing the total to 23) with a combined stellar mass exceeding 10^10 M_⊙, uses PROSPECTOR SED fitting to derive galaxy properties, and claims that core galaxies are dusty and massive while undergoing a synchronised lulling phase whereas outskirts galaxies show recent starbursts. The galaxies exhibit redder UV slopes, stronger Balmer breaks, and Lyα-break suppression implying N_HI ≳ 10^{22.5} cm^{-2}, leading to the conclusion that this is the most extreme and evolved overdensity yet observed at z>7.

Significance. If the photometric membership assignments and derived properties are robust, the result would be significant for demonstrating that environmental effects on galaxy evolution (higher stellar masses, dust attenuation, and gas densities) are already in place by z=7.88, only 650 Myr after the Big Bang. It would provide one of the earliest observational constraints on the intersection of large-scale structure and galaxy formation, with potential implications for models of protocluster assembly and the role of dense environments in accelerating evolution relative to the field.

major comments (3)
  1. [Identification of protocluster members] The central claim that A2744-z7p9OD is the most extreme evolved overdensity at z>7 with total stellar mass >10^{10} M_⊙ and distinct core/outskirts populations rests on the 23 galaxies (including the seven newly identified) being genuine physical members. In the section describing the identification of the seven new protocluster members via NIRCam photometry and PROSPECTOR SED fits, no selection function, photometric redshift purity, false-positive rate, or P(z) robustness test against field contamination is provided. Without this quantification, the overdensity significance, reported differences in dust attenuation and star-formation histories, and the N_HI estimates become unreliable if even a modest fraction are interlopers.
  2. [Core versus outskirts populations] In the results section on core versus outskirts populations, the 'synchronised lulling phase' for the core galaxies is invoked to characterise their star-formation histories but is not quantitatively defined (e.g., no specific thresholds on SFR, stellar age, or PROSPECTOR-derived SFH parameters such as τ or burst fraction). This renders the claimed distinction between core and outskirts populations difficult to reproduce or falsify and risks circularity if the phase is defined post hoc from the same SED fits used to claim overall evolution.
  3. [SED fitting and Lyα-break analysis] The inference of extreme neutral hydrogen column densities (N_HI ≳ 10^{22.5} cm^{-2}) from Lyα-break suppression is presented as evidence for high gas densities, but the section on SED fitting and continuum analysis does not detail the modeling assumptions, how dust attenuation is separated from neutral gas effects, or error propagation in the PROSPECTOR fits. This is load-bearing for the claim of extreme gas densities relative to field galaxies.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the total stellar mass as 'in excess of 10^{10} M_⊙' without quoting the summed value, uncertainty, or breakdown by core/outskirts; providing these numbers (perhaps in Table 1 or §4) would strengthen the quantitative claim.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions and legends should explicitly label which points correspond to the seven newly identified members versus previously known ones, and distinguish core from outskirts galaxies for clarity in the UV-slope and Balmer-break comparisons.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thoughtful and constructive comments, which have identified areas where additional methodological detail will strengthen the manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the paper accordingly to improve clarity, reproducibility, and robustness of the claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Identification of protocluster members] The central claim that A2744-z7p9OD is the most extreme evolved overdensity at z>7 with total stellar mass >10^{10} M_⊙ and distinct core/outskirts populations rests on the 23 galaxies (including the seven newly identified) being genuine physical members. In the section describing the identification of the seven new protocluster members via NIRCam photometry and PROSPECTOR SED fits, no selection function, photometric redshift purity, false-positive rate, or P(z) robustness test against field contamination is provided. Without this quantification, the overdensity significance, reported differences in dust attenuation and star-formation histories, and the N_HI estimates become unreliable if even a modest fraction are interlopers.

    Authors: We agree that explicit quantification of the selection function and contamination risk is essential for supporting the membership claims. The original submission described the photometric redshift selection but did not include a dedicated robustness section. In the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection that (i) specifies the exact photometric redshift probability threshold and filter combination used, (ii) shows the full P(z) distributions for the seven new members, (iii) estimates the expected interloper fraction by integrating the field luminosity function over the redshift window and area, and (iv) demonstrates that the core galaxies remain secure even under conservative contamination assumptions. These additions will allow readers to assess the reliability of the reported overdensity and population differences. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Core versus outskirts populations] In the results section on core versus outskirts populations, the 'synchronised lulling phase' for the core galaxies is invoked to characterise their star-formation histories but is not quantitatively defined (e.g., no specific thresholds on SFR, stellar age, or PROSPECTOR-derived SFH parameters such as τ or burst fraction). This renders the claimed distinction between core and outskirts populations difficult to reproduce or falsify and risks circularity if the phase is defined post hoc from the same SED fits used to claim overall evolution.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the term 'synchronised lulling phase' was introduced without explicit numerical criteria, which reduces reproducibility. In the revision we will define the phase quantitatively using the PROSPECTOR posterior distributions: galaxies are classified as lulling if their SFR averaged over the past 10 Myr is <20 % of the maximum SFR in the SFH, the mass-weighted age exceeds 100 Myr, and the burst fraction parameter is <0.1. We will tabulate these values for all core and outskirts galaxies and show that the distinction emerges from the same SED modeling without post-hoc redefinition. This will make the core/outskirts contrast directly falsifiable from the reported parameters. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [SED fitting and Lyα-break analysis] The inference of extreme neutral hydrogen column densities (N_HI ≳ 10^{22.5} cm^{-2}) from Lyα-break suppression is presented as evidence for high gas densities, but the section on SED fitting and continuum analysis does not detail the modeling assumptions, how dust attenuation is separated from neutral gas effects, or error propagation in the PROSPECTOR fits. This is load-bearing for the claim of extreme gas densities relative to field galaxies.

    Authors: We agree that the modeling assumptions and separation of dust versus neutral-gas effects require explicit documentation. The revised methods section will specify the PROSPECTOR configuration (including the Calzetti attenuation law with free A_V, a separate neutral-hydrogen absorption component with log-uniform prior on N_HI, and the treatment of the Lyman-series forest), describe how the UV continuum slope is fitted independently of the break depth to isolate gas absorption, and report the full posterior medians and 16–84 percentile ranges on N_HI for each galaxy. These additions will demonstrate that the high-column-density inference is robust to the stated assumptions and not driven by dust degeneracy. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results from direct JWST photometry and standard SED fitting

full rationale

The paper reports empirical findings from JWST NIRCam imaging of the A2744-z7p9OD field at z=7.88. Seven new members are identified via photometric redshift selection and PROSPECTOR SED fits, bringing the total to 23 galaxies with aggregate stellar mass >10^10 M⊙. Core vs. outskirts differences in dust, star-formation history, UV slopes, Balmer breaks, and N_HI are measured directly from the photometry and fits. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are invoked to derive these quantities from the conclusion itself; the derivation chain consists of standard observational pipelines whose outputs are independent of the final interpretive claims. The work is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on standard photometric redshift techniques and the PROSPECTOR Bayesian SED code whose priors and dust-law assumptions are not detailed here; no new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • PROSPECTOR SED parameters
    Star-formation history, dust attenuation curve, and metallicity parameters are fitted to the NIRCam photometry for each galaxy.
axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard flat Lambda-CDM cosmology used to convert redshift to cosmic age
    Invoked when stating the system is observed 650 Myr after the Big Bang.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5935 in / 1486 out tokens · 46120 ms · 2026-05-19T05:52:20.007378+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

107 extracted references · 107 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2024, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 688, A146

    Arribas, S., Perna, M., Rodríguez Del Pino, B., et al. 2024, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 688, A146

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    J., Adams, N

    Austin, D., Conselice, C. J., Adams, N. J., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.10751

    work page arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    C., Coil, A

    Baxter, D. C., Coil, A. L., Nadler, E. O., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.03836

    work page arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    S., Wechsler, R

    Behroozi, P. S., Wechsler, R. H., & Conroy, C. 2013, , 770, 57

    work page 2013

  5. [5]

    S., Sijacki, D., Costa, T., Laporte, N., & Witten, C

    Bennett, J. S., Sijacki, D., Costa, T., Laporte, N., & Witten, C. 2024, , 527, 1033

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    E., et al

    Bezanson, R., Labbe, I., Whitaker, K. E., et al. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 974, Issue 1, id.92, 14 pp., 974, 92

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    R., Faber, S

    Blumenthal, G. R., Faber, S. M., Primack, J. R., & Rees, M. J. 1984, , 311, 517

    work page 1984

  8. [8]

    2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 525, 5932

    Borrow, J., Kannan, R., Garaldi, E., et al. 2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 525, 5932

    work page 2023

  9. [9]

    Boylan-Kolchin, M., Springel, V., White, S. D. M., Jenkins, A., & Lemson, G. 2009, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 398, 1150

    work page 2009

  10. [10]

    2023, Zenodo

    Brammer, G. 2023, Zenodo

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    B., van Dokkum, P

    Brammer, G. B., van Dokkum, P. G., & Coppi, P. 2008, The Astrophysical Journal, 686, 1503, publisher: IOP ADS Bibcode: 2008ApJ...686.1503B

    work page 2008

  12. [12]

    R., Weaver, J

    Brinch, M., Greve, T. R., Weaver, J. R., et al. 2023, The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 943, Issue 2, id.153, 47 pp., 943, 153

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    & Charlot, S

    Bruzual, G. & Charlot, S. 2003, , 344, 1000

    work page 2003

  14. [14]

    J., Katz, H., Witten, C., et al

    Cameron, A. J., Katz, H., Witten, C., et al. 2024,

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    2023, The Astrophysical Journal, 948, L14, publisher: IOP ADS Bibcode: 2023ApJ...948L..14C

    Castellano, M., Fontana, A., Treu, T., et al. 2023, The Astrophysical Journal, 948, L14, publisher: IOP ADS Bibcode: 2023ApJ...948L..14C

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    2022, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 657, A9, publisher: EDP Sciences

    Castignani, G., Combes, F., Jablonka, P., et al. 2022, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 657, A9, publisher: EDP Sciences

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    P., Mason, C., et al

    Chen, Z., Stark, D. P., Mason, C., et al. 2024, , 528, 7052

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    A., Gebhardt, K., & Henriques, B

    Chiang, Y.-K., Overzier, R. A., Gebhardt, K., & Henriques, B. 2017, , 844, L23

    work page 2017

  19. [19]

    2013, , 51, 393

    Conroy, C. 2013, , 51, 393

    work page 2013

  20. [20]

    E., & White, M

    Conroy, C., Gunn, J. E., & White, M. 2009, , 699, 486

    work page 2009

  21. [21]

    2024, The host dark matter haloes of the first quasars, arXiv:2308.12987 [astro-ph]

    Costa, T. 2024, The host dark matter haloes of the first quasars, arXiv:2308.12987 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    P., et al

    Costa, T., Arrigoni Battaia, F., Farina, E. P., et al. 2022, , 517, 1767

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    A., et al

    Covelo-Paz, A., Meuwly, C., Oesch, P. A., et al. 2025, A systematic search for dormant galaxies at z 5-7 from the JWST NIRSpec archive, arXiv:2506.22540 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.05948, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2409.05948 Dessauges-Zavadsky, M., Ginolfi, M., Pozzi, F., et al

    de Graaff, A., Brammer, G., Weibel, A., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.05948

    work page arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    D'Eugenio, F., Maiolino, R., Perna, M., et al. 2025, BlackTHUNDER strikes twice: rest-frame Balmer -line absorption and high Eddington accretion rate in a Little Red Dot at z=7.04 , publication Title: arXiv e-prints ADS Bibcode: 2025arXiv250311752D

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    J., Li, Q., et al

    Duan, Q., Conselice, C. J., Li, Q., et al. 2025, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Advance Access

    work page 2025

  27. [27]

    M., Lin, X., et al

    Fudamoto, Y., Helton, J. M., Lin, X., et al. 2025, eprint arXiv:2503.15597, arXiv:2503.15597

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    J., Shuntov, M., Atek, H., et al

    Furtak, L. J., Shuntov, M., Atek, H., et al. 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 519, 3064

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    J., Zitrin, A., Weaver, J

    Furtak, L. J., Zitrin, A., Weaver, J. R., et al. 2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 523, 4568

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    2023, , 954, L11

    Gelli, V., Salvadori, S., Ferrara, A., Pallottini, A., & Carniani, S. 2023, , 954, L11

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    Gunn, J. E. & Gott, J. Richard, I. 1972, , 176, 1

    work page 1972

  32. [32]

    2024, , 960, 56

    Harikane, Y., Nakajima, K., Ouchi, M., et al. 2024, , 960, 56

    work page 2024

  33. [33]

    2023, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 955, L2

    Hashimoto, T., Álvarez Márquez, J., Fudamoto, Y., et al. 2023, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 955, L2

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    E., Brammer, G

    Heintz, K. E., Brammer, G. B., Watson, D., et al. 2025, Astronomy &amp; Astrophysics, Volume 693, id.A60, 20 pp., 693, A60

    work page 2025

  35. [35]

    E., Watson, D., Brammer, G., et al

    Heintz, K. E., Watson, D., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, Science, 384, 890

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    M., Sun, F., Woodrum, C., et al

    Helton, J. M., Sun, F., Woodrum, C., et al. 2024 a , The Astrophysical Journal, 962, 124

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    M., Sun, F., Woodrum, C., et al

    Helton, J. M., Sun, F., Woodrum, C., et al. 2024 b , Identification of High - Redshift Galaxy Overdensities in GOODS - N and GOODS - S , arXiv:2311.04270

    work page arXiv 2024

  38. [38]

    J., Oesch, P

    Herard-Demanche, T., Bouwens, R. J., Oesch, P. A., et al. 2025, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 537, Issue 2, pp.788-808, 537, 788

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 496, 1

    Huang, K.-W., Ni, Y., Feng, Y., & Di Matteo, T. 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 496, 1

    work page 2020

  40. [40]

    2016, The Astrophysical Journal, 822, 5, publisher: IOP ADS Bibcode: 2016ApJ...822....5I

    Ishigaki, M., Ouchi, M., & Harikane, Y. 2016, The Astrophysical Journal, 822, 5, publisher: IOP ADS Bibcode: 2016ApJ...822....5I

    work page 2016

  41. [41]

    Jeans, J. H. 1902, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, 199, 1

    work page 1902

  42. [42]

    K., Steinhardt, C

    Jespersen, C. K., Steinhardt, C. L., Somerville, R. S., & Lovell, C. C. 2025, The Astrophysical Journal, 982, 23, arXiv:2403.00050 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    2025, BlackTHUNDER -- A non-stellar Balmer break in a black hole-dominated little red dot at \ z=7.04\ , publication Title: arXiv e-prints ADS Bibcode: 2025arXiv250113082J

    Ji, X., Maiolino, R., Übler, H., et al. 2025, BlackTHUNDER -- A non-stellar Balmer break in a black hole-dominated little red dot at \ z=7.04\ , publication Title: arXiv e-prints ADS Bibcode: 2025arXiv250113082J

    work page 2025

  44. [44]

    D., Leja, J., Conroy, C., & Speagle, J

    Johnson, B. D., Leja, J., Conroy, C., & Speagle, J. S. 2021, , 254, 22

    work page 2021

  45. [45]

    D., Leja, J

    Johnson, B. D., Leja, J. L., Conroy, C., & Speagle, J. S. 2019, Astrophysics Source Code Library, ascl:1905.025

    work page 2019

  46. [46]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2502.20437

    Kannan, R., Puchwein, E., Smith, A., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2502.20437

    work page arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 494, 2200

    Katz, H., Ramsoy, M., Rosdahl, J., et al. 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 494, 2200

    work page 2020

  48. [48]

    2023, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 6, 44

    Katz, H., Rosdahl, J., Kimm, T., et al. 2023, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 6, 44

    work page 2023

  49. [49]

    2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 526, 6103

    Kugel, R., Schaye, J., Schaller, M., et al. 2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 526, 6103

    work page 2023

  50. [50]

    & Choudhury, T

    Kulkarni, G. & Choudhury, T. R. 2011, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 412, 2781, publisher: OUP ADS Bibcode: 2011MNRAS.412.2781K

    work page 2011

  51. [51]

    2024, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 691, A310, publisher: EDP ADS Bibcode: 2024A&A...691A.310K

    Kuruvanthodi, A., Schaerer, D., Marques-Chaves, R., et al. 2024, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 691, A310, publisher: EDP ADS Bibcode: 2024A&A...691A.310K

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    S., Boone, F., et al

    Laporte, N., Ellis, R. S., Boone, F., et al. 2017, , 837, L21

    work page 2017

  53. [53]

    2022, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 667, L3, aDS Bibcode: 2022A&A...667L...3L

    Laporte, N., Zitrin, A., Dole, H., et al. 2022, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 667, L3, aDS Bibcode: 2022A&A...667L...3L

    work page 2022

  54. [54]

    C., Johnson, B

    Leja, J., Carnall, A. C., Johnson, B. D., Conroy, C., & Speagle, J. S. 2019, , 876, 3

    work page 2019

  55. [55]

    J., Sarron, F., et al

    Li, Q., Conselice, C. J., Sarron, F., et al. 2025, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 539, Issue 2, pp. 1796-1819, 24 pp., 539, 1796

    work page 2025

  56. [56]

    2024, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 532, Issue 4, pp.4551-4569, 532, 4551

    Lim, S., Tacchella, S., Schaye, J., et al. 2024, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 532, Issue 4, pp.4551-4569, 532, 4551

    work page 2024

  57. [57]

    J., D'Eugenio, F., Maiolino, R., et al

    Looser, T. J., D'Eugenio, F., Maiolino, R., et al. 2025, Astronomy &amp; Astrophysics, Volume 697, id.A88, 16 pp., 697, A88

    work page 2025

  58. [58]

    J., D'Eugenio, F., Maiolino, R., et al

    Looser, T. J., D'Eugenio, F., Maiolino, R., et al. 2024, , 629, 53

    work page 2024

  59. [59]

    2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 488, 4004

    Lupi, A., Volonteri, M., Decarli, R., et al. 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 488, 4004

    work page 2019

  60. [60]

    1995, , 441, 18

    Madau, P. 1995, , 441, 18

    work page 1995

  61. [61]

    C., Champagne, J

    Marcelin, L. C., Champagne, J. B., Wang, F., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.18262 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  62. [62]

    A., et al

    Matthee, J., Mackenzie, R., Simcoe, R. A., et al. 2023, The Astrophysical Journal, 950, 67

    work page 2023

  63. [63]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    McClymont, W., Tacchella, S., Smith, A., et al. 2025, The THESAN - ZOOM project: Burst , quench, repeat -- unveiling the evolution of high-redshift galaxies along the star-forming main sequence, arXiv:2503.00106 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  64. [64]

    2025 a , The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 982, Issue 2, id.153, 15 pp., 982, 153

    Morishita, T., Liu, Z., Stiavelli, M., et al. 2025 a , The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 982, Issue 2, id.153, 15 pp., 982, 153

    work page 2025

  65. [65]

    2023, , 947, L24

    Morishita, T., Roberts-Borsani, G., Treu, T., et al. 2023, , 947, L24

    work page 2023

  66. [66]

    2025 b , The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 985, Issue 1, id.83, 11 pp., 985, 83

    Morishita, T., Stiavelli, M., Vanzella, E., et al. 2025 b , The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 985, Issue 1, id.83, 11 pp., 985, 83

    work page 2025

  67. [67]

    2025, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 539, Issue 2, pp

    Morokuma-Matsui, K., Yajima, H., & Abe, M. 2025, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 539, Issue 2, pp. 1834-1849, 16 pp., 539, 1834

    work page 2025

  68. [68]

    Black Hole Star

    Naidu, R. P., Matthee, J., Katz, H., et al. 2025, A " Black Hole Star " Reveals the Remarkable Gas - Enshrouded Hearts of the Little Red Dots , publication Title: arXiv e-prints ADS Bibcode: 2025arXiv250316596N

    work page 2025

  69. [69]

    P., Matthee, J., Kramarenko, I., et al

    Naidu, R. P., Matthee, J., Kramarenko, I., et al. 2024, All the Little Things in Abell 2744: > 1000 Gravitationally Lensed Dwarf Galaxies at z=0-9 from JWST NIRCam Grism Spectroscopy , publication Title: arXiv e-prints ADS Bibcode: 2024arXiv241001874N

    work page 2024

  70. [70]

    Overzier, R. A. 2016, The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, Volume 24, Issue 1, article id.14, 57 pp., 24, 14

    work page 2016

  71. [71]

    2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 513, 5621

    Pallottini, A., Ferrara, A., Gallerani, S., et al. 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 513, 5621

    work page 2022

  72. [72]

    Papovich, C., Dickinson, M., & Ferguson, H. C. 2001, , 559, 620

    work page 2001

  73. [73]

    Peebles, P. J. E. 1982, , 263, L1

    work page 1982

  74. [74]

    2012, , 422, 3285

    Pforr, J., Maraston, C., & Tonini, C. 2012, , 422, 3285

    work page 2012

  75. [75]

    H., Bezanson, R., Labbe, I., et al

    Price, S. H., Bezanson, R., Labbe, I., et al. 2025, The Astrophysical Journal, 982, 51

    work page 2025

  76. [76]

    2025, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Advance Access

    Puskás, D., Tacchella, S., Simmonds, C., et al. 2025, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Advance Access

    work page 2025

  77. [77]

    Rees, M. J. & Ostriker, J. P. 1977, , 179, 541

    work page 1977

  78. [78]

    2022, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 938, L13

    Roberts-Borsani, G., Morishita, T., Treu, T., et al. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 938, L13

    work page 2022

  79. [79]

    2024, The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 976, Issue 2, id.193, 24 pp., 976, 193

    Roberts-Borsani, G., Treu, T., Shapley, A., et al. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 976, Issue 2, id.193, 24 pp., 976, 193

    work page 2024

  80. [80]

    2022, , 515, 2386

    Rosdahl, J., Blaizot, J., Katz, H., et al. 2022, , 515, 2386

    work page 2022

Showing first 80 references.