Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 56 references

Renormalised Models for Variable Coefficient Singular SPDEs

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Variable-coefficient singular SPDEs get convergent renormalised models.

desk verdict First variable-coefficient BPHZ theorem for regularity structures; substantive and mostly honest, but the lifting step leans on an unverified uniformity-in-kernel premise that a referee must check. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.06851 v1 pith:PRYWPVJH submitted 2025-07-09 math.AP math.FAmath.PR

Lucas Broux , Harprit Singh , Rhys Steele This is my paper
classification math.APmath.FAmath.PR MSC 35R6060H1760H15
keywords regularitystructuresrenormalisedmodelssingularSPDEsvariablecoefficientsBPHZrenormalisationparabolicoperatorsstochasticPDEestimateslocalityofcounterterms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper closes the main gap between constant-coefficient and variable-coefficient singular SPDEs in the regularity structures approach: convergence of renormalised models as the ultraviolet cut-off is removed. The central result, Theorem 2.12, says that for any finite historic sector, whenever the noise satisfies the assumptions of at least one of the three earlier constant-coefficient BPHZ theorems, every kernel assignment admits a sequence of state-space-dependent preparation maps whose renormalised models converge in every $L^p$, with the limiting model locally Lipschitz continuous in the coefficient field. Because translation invariance is not available, counterterms must be functions of the space-time point rather than constants, and Corollary 2.16 shows they can be chosen local: the renormalisation functions depend on the point only through a finite-order jet of the coefficient field, verified for second-order parabolic operators in Section 9. The upshot is that the variable-coefficient case offers no fundamental obstruction: the full subcritical regime is in reach whenever the constant-coefficient BPHZ estimates are available.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is an auxiliary regularity structure $T_{\mathrm{Ban}}$ whose homogeneous components are partially symmetrised projective tensor products of infinite-dimensional Banach spaces: instead of a copy of $\mathbb{R}$ attached to each tree edge, each edge carries a space of kernels, so abstract integration can realise the whole family of kernels $K^z$ at once. The BPHZ preparation map on $T_{\mathrm{Ban}}$ is of the form $(\hat{\ell}\otimes \mathrm{id})\Delta^-_r$, with $\Delta^-_r$ the rooted extraction coproduct; stochastic estimates are lifted from scalar-valued structures $T^\tau$ constructed for each tree, and annealed bounds are converted to quenched bounds by a Kolmogorov argument. Pointed modelled distributions then transfer the model back to the usual reduced structure $T_{\mathrm{eq}}$, and an algebraic comparison between $\Delta^-_r$ and an auxiliary coproduct identifies the preparation map explicitly, with $\ell^\varepsilon_z$ depending on $z$ only through the finite jet of the kernel assignment.

What would settle it

Find a kernel assignment and a noise satisfying one of the input hypotheses for which the uniform supremum over $A^\tau$ on the right-hand side of (5.6) or (5.7) diverges for some tree in a historic sector; that would break the annealed estimates and with them Theorem 2.12. Equivalently, in a concrete second-order parabolic example such as $\partial_t u = \partial_i(a^{ij}(x)\partial_j u) + u\,\xi$ with $a^{ij}(x) = \delta^{ij} + \varepsilon \eta^{ij}(x)$, compute the BPHZ renormalisation function for the simplest negative-degree tree and check whether its dependence on $\eta$ factors through the finite jet $(\eta(x), \nabla\eta(x))$ prescribed by Corollary 2.16.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that renormalisation in a non-translation-invariant setting can be performed by freezing the coefficient field at the space-time point while still obtaining a genuine model on the ordinary scalar regularity structure. Precisely, for each finite historic sector $\langle B\rangle$ and each kernel assignment $K$—a choice of regularising kernels for each kernel type, allowed to vary continuously with the space-time point—there is a sequence of preparation maps $P^\varepsilon(z,\tau) = (\ell^\varepsilon_z \otimes \mathrm{id})\Delta^-_r \tau$ such that the resulting renormalised models converge in $L^p$ to a limit $Z$ that does not depend on the mollifier and depends locally Lipschitz-continuously on $K$; the functional $\ell^\varepsilon_z$ depends on $z$ only through the finite collection $(\partial^k K^z)_{|k|<m}$. When the kernel assignment comes from the Green's function of a second-order parabolic operator with Hölder coefficients, this forces the counterterms in the renormalised equation to be local functions of the coefficient field and finitely many of its derivatives at each point. Combined with the existing analytic and algebraic machinery, this yields local-in-time well-posedness for a wide class of variable-coefficient subcritical singular SPDEs in their full subcritical regimes.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the scalar-valued BPHZ estimates taken from the earlier constant-coefficient theorems hold uniformly in the kernel assignment on the auxiliary structures $T^\tau$, exactly as the suprema on the right-hand side of (5.6) and (5.7) require; those earlier theorems were proved for particular constant-coefficient models, and this paper does not rederive that uniform-in-kernel form.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If correct, Theorem 2.12 supplies the missing BPHZ convergence input, so the standard fixed-point machinery gives local-in-time well-posedness for variable-coefficient subcritical singular SPDEs in their full subcritical regimes.
  • Corollary 2.16 implies the renormalised equation has a counterterm of the form $c^\varepsilon_\tau[(\partial^j a(z))_{|j|<N}]$, so the counterterms are local and the renormalised equation is translation-equivariant when the coefficient field is.
  • The limiting model $Z$ is a locally Lipschitz continuous function of the kernel assignment and is independent of the mollifier.
  • Because the proof imports stochastic estimates rather than one particular probabilistic technique, the result inherits the full range of noise assumptions covered by any of the three input BPHZ theorems.
  • For second-order parabolic operators, Section 9's kernel decomposition verifies the locality assumption, so the theorem applies concretely to $L = \partial_t - a^{ij}\partial_i\partial_j - b^i\partial_i - c$ with Hölder coefficients.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the same freezing-at-the-point strategy is a natural template for geometric settings; scalar SPDEs on manifolds whose universal cover is $\mathbb{R}^d$ lift to variable-coefficient equations, so this result suggests the remaining ingredient for a geometric BPHZ theorem is the analogue of the heat-kernel decomposition.
  • Editorial inference: the explicit formula $P^\varepsilon = (\ell^\varepsilon_z \otimes \mathrm{id})\Delta^-_r \tau$ expresses the variable-coefficient counterterm through constant-coefficient renormalisation constants of auxiliary structures, which may make the renormalised equation's dependence on the coefficients computable in examples.
  • Editorial inference: the Hölder regularity assumed on the coefficients in Section 9 is probably not optimal; testing whether the locality proof survives with weaker coefficients would delineate the true scope of the result.
  • Editorial inference: the restriction to rational scaling ratios is described in the paper as technical, so a natural check is whether the wavelet-based arguments can be replaced by a scale-blind argument to remove it.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a general framework for constructing renormalised models in Hairer's regularity structures for variable-coefficient singular SPDEs. It introduces an auxiliary regularity structure TBan whose components are partially symmetrised projective tensor products of infinite-dimensional Banach spaces, builds admissible models from preparation maps, and constructs a BPHZ model on historic sectors. Using pointed modelled distributions, it transfers these models to the standard reduced structure Teq, yielding convergence of mollified renormalised models (Theorem 2.12), Lipschitz dependence on the kernel assignment, and an explicit form of the state-space-dependent preparation map. Under Assumption 2.15, the renormalisation functions depend only on a finite jet of the coefficient field (Corollary 2.16), and the paper verifies the assumption for second-order parabolic operators via a detailed heat-kernel decomposition in Section 9. The paper is explicit that the noise itself remains translation invariant in law (Remark 2.14).

Significance. If correct, this is a significant contribution: it supplies a missing variable-coefficient BPHZ input, generalising the scope of [CH16, HS24, BH23] beyond translation-invariant coefficients, and it provides a locality mechanism for counterterms. The universal-property construction of TBan is elegant, the analytic framework of pointed modelled distributions is developed in useful generality, and the heat-kernel decomposition in Section 9 is a nontrivial verification. The paper is also unusually explicit about its hypotheses and limitations. However, the central stochastic lifting argument inherits an external uniformity assumption that is not stated as a hypothesis of Theorem 2.12, and several load-bearing analytic lemmas are only sketched. The result is credible but needs these gaps closed.

major comments (3)
  1. [§5.1, Lemma 5.14 and Theorem 2.12] The annealed estimates (5.6)-(5.7) assert bounds whose right-hand side contains a supremum over all kernel assignments Aτ on the auxiliary scalar structures Tτ. The proof of Lemma 5.14 obtains the inequality by taking that supremum as the normalising constant for the given induced assignment; it does not prove that the supremum is finite or bounded uniformly in the relevant data. The text before the lemma explicitly makes this uniform-in-kernel property an assumption ('so long as those scalar valued counterparts are assumed to be suitably uniform in the kernel assignment'), but Theorem 2.12's hypotheses only say that (Teq, ξ) satisfies the assumptions of one of [CH16, HS24, BH23]. If those cited theorems are only stated for fixed kernels, the annealed estimate, and hence the quenched estimates and Theorem 2.12, are incomplete. The two-model version (5.7), needed for local Lipschitz continuity of K ↦ Z, additionally requires uniformity of difference estimates for two noise assignments, which is even further from the stated inputs. Please either verify this uniformity from the cited results, add it as an explicit hypothesis, or supply a proof.
  2. [§4.2, Lemma 4.19] The planted-tree case of Lemma 4.19 is dismissed as an instance of [Hai14, Theorem 5.14] with a 'minor adaptation' for two different kernels, and the details are omitted. This lemma is load-bearing: it provides the Γ-bounds used in Lemma 4.20, in the quenched estimates of Lemma 5.23, and in the continuity of the model as a function of the kernel assignment. Since the components of TBan are infinite-dimensional and the two-model comparison involves different kernel assignments as well as different noise assignments, the extension is not a routine re-reading of the scalar theorem. Please provide a complete proof or a precise reference that covers this situation.
  3. [§2.1, Remark 2.14 and Theorem 2.12] Theorem 2.12 is stated without explicitly listing the translation invariance of the noise among its hypotheses, even though the proof relies on it and Remark 2.14 later acknowledges it. This is not a mathematical error, but it makes the statement of the main theorem misleading. The assumption should be moved into the theorem statement or the abstract should be adjusted so that the reader is not led to believe the result covers non-translation-invariant noise.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§1, references] The name 'Kupianen' in the introduction appears to be a typo for 'Kupiainen' (reference [Kup16]).
  2. [§2.2, Strategy of Proof] The word 'inpired' should be 'inspired'.
  3. [§5.1, Lemma 5.13 proof] In the displayed formula in the proof of Lemma 5.13, the expression '⊗ ¯w 〈 ¯www 〉' contains a typo; it should read '⊗ ¯w 〈 ¯w 〉' or the intended symbol should be corrected.
  4. [§9, Assumption 2.15] The verification of Assumption 2.15 for second-order parabolic operators is stated under Hölder regularity conditions that the authors say are 'probably not optimal'. This limitation should be stated more prominently in the introduction or near Corollary 2.16, since the locality conclusion is conditional on it.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular reduction; Theorem 2.12 is a conditional lifting of scalar BPHZ estimates, and the only concern is an unstated uniformity premise in Lemma 5.14, which is a completeness/correctness issue rather than a circular one.

full rationale

The central derivation is not circular. Theorem 2.12 is explicitly conditional on external scalar-valued BPHZ results: its hypothesis is that "(Teq, ξ) satisfies the assumptions of at least one of [CH16, HS24, BH23]", and Remark 2.14 states that "The precise estimates we require as input are simply estimates on the right hand side of the inequalities in Lemma 5.14." This is a reduction to external benchmarks, not a tautology. Lemma 5.13 identifies the BPHZ model on TBan with the BPHZ model on auxiliary scalar-valued structures Tτ, and this identification is proved by induction on Age(σ∗), not imposed by definition. Lemma 5.14 then bounds the desired annealed estimate by a supremum over kernel assignments Aτ of the corresponding scalar-valued estimate. That is a legitimate lifting step, provided the cited scalar theorems indeed hold uniformly in the kernel assignment on Tτ. The paper itself flags this premise: the estimate is said to hold "so long as those scalar valued counterparts are assumed to be suitably uniform in the kernel assignment and to hold on the regularity structures Tτ defined above rather than only on Teq." Theorem 2.12 does not state this uniformity as an explicit hypothesis, so there is a possible gap between the stated assumptions of Theorem 2.12 and the requirements of Lemma 5.14; however, this is a missing verification of an external premise, not a case where an output is equivalent to an input by construction. The quenched estimates are obtained from the annealed ones through a Kolmogorov criterion (Lemmas 5.18, 5.19, 5.22, 5.23), which does not reintroduce the target statement. The locality conclusion is conditional on Assumption 2.15, which is independently verified in Section 9 for second-order parabolic operators via a Volterra-series kernel decomposition; the counterterm formula of Corollary 2.16 follows from the explicit form of P^ε in Theorem 2.12, not from assuming the conclusion. The only self-citation concern is the reliance on [HS24], whose authors overlap with two of the present authors. That citation is used for the scalar-valued BPHZ estimates that serve as inputs, and it is not used to define away the variable-coefficient result. It is a normal external citation, though the uniformity requirement of Lemma 5.14 should be checked against the precise statements of [CH16, HS24, BH23]. Overall, no step reduces by construction; the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 3 invented entities

Proof-based paper with no data fitting. The only numbers chosen are regularity bookkeeping parameters (order O, jet order m, Hölder exponents), all existential or non-optimal in the authors' own words. The central claim rests on six structural assumptions, the most delicate being the uniformity-in-kernel form of the scalar BPHZ estimates borrowed from [CH16, HS24, BH23] and the Green's kernel jet-locality hypothesis (Assumption 2.15) needed only for the locality conclusion. The introduced objects are mathematical constructions with internal existence proofs; none is an empirically postulated entity.

free parameters (3)
  • Kernel assignment order O
    Existential parameter in Theorem 2.12 whose requirements depend on Teq, B, and the chosen input theorem. It is a regularity bookkeeping exponent, not fitted to data.
  • Jet order m of the renormalisation functionals
    The integer m in Theorem 2.12 bounding the order of the jet (∂^k K^z)_{|k|<m} through which the preparation maps depend on the point z. It is produced by the proof, not fitted.
  • Hölder regularity level of the coefficient field in Section 9
    Assumption 9.1 requires the coefficients (a,b,c) to have a finite Hölder regularity; the authors state the assumption is likely not optimal. This controls the order of the kernel assignment.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Assumption 2.1: no tree conforming to the rule contains a kernel-type edge with |l(e)|_s - |e(e)|_s < 0.
    Used in the recursive construction of models from preparation maps, specifically in the integration case of the Bru18-style argument in Sections 4 and 5 and in Lemma 5.8. Stated to hold for all equations of interest.
  • domain assumption The scaling ratios s_i are pairwise rational.
    Section 1.1 states this is implicitly used to gain access to wavelet techniques in technical proofs; the authors expect it to be non-essential.
  • domain assumption The noise ξ is translation invariant in law and has moments of all orders.
    Remark 2.14 admits this is inherited from [CH16, HS24, BH23]. The generalization is for variable-coefficient operators, not for space-dependent noise statistics.
  • domain assumption The scalar-valued BPHZ estimates of [CH16, HS24, BH23] hold with uniformity in the kernel assignment as used in Lemma 5.14.
    Theorem 2.12 is conditional on '(Teq, ξ) satisfies the assumptions of at least one of [CH16, HS24, BH23]'. The lifting inequality (5.6)-(5.7) requires a supremum over kernel assignments Aτ on auxiliary structures Tτ.
  • domain assumption Assumption 2.15 / Assumption 9.1: the singular part of the Green's kernel satisfies ∂^k K^z = f_k((∂^j a(z))_{|j|≤N}), verified for second order parabolic operators.
    This is the premise for the locality conclusion Corollary 2.16. Section 9 verifies it via a Volterra series and Taylor expansion under Hölder coefficient regularity. Theorem 2.12 itself does not require it.
  • standard math Background regularity structures machinery from [Hai14, BHZ19, Bru18]: complete subcritical rules, Hopf algebra structures, the Extension Theorem, and Schauder estimates.
    Treated as black boxes throughout; the paper adapts them to finite-order kernels and to the infinite-dimensional setting.
invented entities (3)
  • TBan, the regularity structure with infinite-dimensional (partially symmetrised projective tensor product) components
    purpose: To realize a family of abstract integration maps encoding the frozen kernels K^z for all z simultaneously, so coefficient freezing happens at the level of the model.
    The central technical construction. It is defined by a universal property with existence established in Appendix A by adapting [CCHS22]. It is a well-defined mathematical object rather than a postulated empirical entity, but it has no corroboration outside this paper.
  • Historic sectors and the history Hist(S) of a tree set
    purpose: Finite sectors closed under all operations needed for the recursive construction of the BPHZ preparation map and model (Definitions 5.3 and 5.4).
    Internal bookkeeping device; finiteness is proved in Lemma 5.5. It is needed because the BPHZ preparation map is built together with the model.
  • State-space dependent preparation functionals ℓ^ε_z and the maps P^ε(z, τ) = (ℓ^ε_z ⊗ id)∆^-_r τ
    purpose: The variable-coefficient replacement for renormalisation constants; their locality through finite jets is the content of Corollary 2.16.
    These objects are constructed in the paper and their counterterm form is tracked so that the renormalised equation can be written down via [BB21]. Locality is a theorem about them, not an input.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Renormalised Models for Variable Coefficient Singular SPDEs." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PRYWPVJH

@misc{pith2026250706851,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Renormalised Models for Variable Coefficient Singular SPDEs},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PRYWPVJH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.06851}
}
read the original abstract

In this work we prove convergence of renormalised models in the framework of regularity structures [Hai14] for a wide class of variable coefficient singular SPDEs in their full subcritical regimes. In particular, we provide for the first time an extension of the main results of [CH16, HS24, BH23] beyond the translation invariant setting. In the non-translation invariant setting, it is necessary to introduce renormalisation functions rather than renormalisation constants. We show that under a very general assumption, which we prove covers the case of second order parabolic operators, these renormalisation functions can be chosen to be local in the sense that their space-time dependence enters only through a finite order jet of the coefficient field of the differential operator at the given space-time point. Furthermore we show that the models we construct depend continuously on the coefficient field.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type url doi eprint volume year label extra.label sort.label INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION not #0 #2 if INTEGERS l FUNCTION string.length #1 'l := ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in capitalize " " * FUNCT...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Bailleul and F

    I. Bailleul and F. Bernicot . Heat semigroup and singular PDE s. Journal of Functional Analysis 270, no. 9, (2016), 3344--3452. doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2016.02.012 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfa.2016.02.012

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2016.02.012 2016

  4. [4]

    Bailleul and F

    I. Bailleul and F. Bernicot . High order paracontrolled calculus. In Forum of Mathematics, Sigma, vol. 7, e44. Cambridge University Press, 2019. doi:10.1017/fms.2019.44 https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/fms.2019.44

    work page doi:10.1017/fms.2019.44 2019

  5. [5]

    Bailleul and Y

    I. Bailleul and Y. Bruned . Locality for Singular Stochastic PDEs . arXiv preprint (2021). arXiv:2109.00399 https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.00399

    arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    Bruned , A

    Y. Bruned , A. Chandra , I. Chevyrev , and M. Hairer . Renormalising SPDE s in regularity structures. Journal of the European Mathematical Society 23, no. 3, (2020), 869--947. doi:10.4171/jems/1025 https://dx.doi.org/10.4171/jems/1025

    doi:10.4171/jems/1025 2020

  7. [7]

    Weighted Besov spaces on Heisenberg groups and applications to the Parabolic Anderson model

    F. Baudoin , L. Chen , C.-H. Huang , C. Ouyang , S. Tindel , and J. Wang . Weighted Besov spaces on Heisenberg groups and applications to the Parabolic Anderson model . arXiv preprint (2025). arXiv:arXiv:2501.04593 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:2501.04593

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    Broux , F

    L. Broux , F. Caravenna , and L. Zambotti . Hairer’s multilevel Schauder estimates without regularity structures . Transactions of the American Mathematical Society (2024). doi:10.1090/tran/9245 https://dx.doi.org/10.1090/tran/9245

    work page doi:10.1090/tran/9245 2024

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    Bailleul , N

    I. Bailleul , N. Dang , L. Ferdinand , and T. T \^o . ^4_3 measures on compact R iemannian 3-manifolds . arXiv preprint (2023). arXiv:2304.10185 https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.10185

    2023

  2. [10]

    Bailleul , N

    I. Bailleul , N. Dang , L. Ferdinand , and T. D. T \^o . Global harmonic analysis for ^4_3 on closed R iemannian manifolds . arXiv preprint (2023). arXiv:2306.07757 https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.07757

    2023 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Bailleul and M

    I. Bailleul and M. Hoshino . Random models on regularity-integrability structures . arXiv preprint (2023). arXiv:2310.10202 https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.10202

    2023 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Bailleul , M

    I. Bailleul , M. Hoshino , and S. Kusuoka . Regularity structures for quasilinear singular SPDEs . Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 248, no. 6, (2024), 127. doi:10.1007/s00205-024-02069-6 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00205-024-02069-6

    2024 doi

  5. [13]

    Bruned , M

    Y. Bruned , M. Hairer , and L. Zambotti . Algebraic renormalisation of regularity structures . Inventiones mathematicae 215, (2019), 1039--1156. doi:10.1007/s00222-018-0841-x https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00222-018-0841-x

    2019 doi

  6. [14]

    Bruned and P

    Y. Bruned and P. Linares . A top-down approach to algebraic renormalization in regularity structures based on multi-indices . Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 248, no. 6, (2024), 111. doi:10.1007/s00205-024-02041-4 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00205-024-02041-4

    2024 doi

  7. [15]

    Broux , F

    L. Broux , F. Otto , and R. Steele . Multi-Index Based Solution Theory to the ^4 Equation in the Full Subcritical Regime . arXiv preprint (2025). arXiv:2503.01621 https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.01621

    2025 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Baudoin , C

    F. Baudoin , C. Ouyang , S. Tindel , and J. Wang . Parabolic Anderson model on Heisenberg groups: The Itô setting . Journal of Functional Analysis 285, no. 1, (2023), 109920. doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2023.109920 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfa.2023.109920

    2023

  9. [17]

    Y. Bruned . Recursive formulae in regularity structures. Stochastics and Partial Differential Equations: Analysis and Computations 6, (2018), 525--564. doi:10.1007/s40072-018-0115-z https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40072-018-0115-z

    2018 doi

  10. [18]

    Chandra , I

    A. Chandra , I. Chevyrev , M. Hairer , and H. Shen . Langevin dynamic for the 2D Y ang-- M ills measure. Publications math \'e matiques de l'IH \'E S (2022), 1--147. doi:10.1007/s10240-022-00132-0 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10240-022-00132-0

    2022 doi

  11. [19]

    Chandra and L

    A. Chandra and L. Ferdinand . A flow approach to the generalized KPZ equation. arXiv preprint (2024). arXiv:2402.03101 https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.03101

    2024 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Chandra and L

    A. Chandra and L. Ferdinand . Rough differential equations in the flow approach. arXiv preprint (2024). arXiv:2411.07157 https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.07157

    2024

  13. [21]

    Chandra , G

    A. Chandra , G. d. L. Feltes , and H. Weber . A priori bounds for 2-d generalised parabolic anderson model. arXiv preprint (2024). arXiv:2402.05544 https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.05544

    2024

  14. [22]

    Chen , B

    Y. Chen , B. Fehrman , and W. Xu . Periodic homogenisation for two dimensional generalised parabolic A nderson model. arXiv preprint (2024). arXiv:2401.05718 https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.05718

    2024

  15. [23]

    Chandra and M

    A. Chandra and M. Hairer . An analytic BPHZ theorem for regularity structures. arXiv preprint (2016). arXiv:1612.08138 https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.08138

    2016 arXiv

  16. [24]

    L. S. Charlap . Bieberbach groups and flat manifolds. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012. doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-8687-2 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8687-2

    2012 doi

  17. [25]

    Chandra , A

    A. Chandra , A. Moinat , and H. Weber . A P riori B ounds for the ^4 E quation in the F ull S ub-critical R egime. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 247, no. 3, (2023), 48. doi:10.1007/s00205-023-01876-7 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00205-023-01876-7

    2023 doi

  18. [26]

    Chen and C

    H. Chen and C. Ouyang . Global Geometry within an SPDE Well-Posedness Problem . arXiv preprint (2025). arXiv:2502.04572 https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.04572

    2025

  19. [27]

    Chen and W

    Y. Chen and W. Xu . Periodic homogenisation for p( )_2 . arXiv preprint (2023). arXiv:2311.16398 https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.16398

    2023 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Dahlqvist , J

    A. Dahlqvist , J. Diehl , and B. K. Driver . The parabolic A nderson model on R iemann surfaces. Probability Theory and Related Fields 174, no. 1-2, (2019), 369--444. doi:10.1007/s00440-018-0857-6 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00440-018-0857-6

    2019 doi

  21. [29]

    Duch , M

    P. Duch , M. Gubinelli , and P. Rinaldi . Parabolic stochastic quantisation of the fractional ^4_3 model in the full subcritical regime. arXiv preprint (2023). arXiv:2303.18112 https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.18112

    2023

  22. [30]

    P. Duch . Renormalization of singular elliptic stochastic PDEs using flow equation. arXiv preprint (2022). arXiv:2201.05031 https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.05031

    2022 arXiv

  23. [31]

    P. Duch . Flow equation approach to singular stochastic PDE s. Probability and Mathematical Physics 6, no. 2, (2025), 327--437. doi:10.2140/pmp.2025.6.327 https://dx.doi.org/10.2140/pmp.2025.6.327

    2025 doi

  24. [32]

    Erhard and M

    D. Erhard and M. Hairer . Discretisation of regularity structures. Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincar \'e , Probabilit \'e s et Statistiques 55, no. 4(2019). doi:10.1214/18-AIHP947 https://dx.doi.org/10.1214/18-AIHP947

    2019 doi

  25. [33]

    Eulry , A

    H. Eulry , A. Mouzard , and T. Robert . Anderson stochastic quantization equation. arXiv preprint (2024). arXiv:2401.12742 https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.12742

    2024 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Esquivel and H

    S. Esquivel and H. Weber . A priori bounds for the dynamic fractional ^4 model on T ^3 in the full subcritical regime. arXiv preprint (2024). arXiv:2411.16536 https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.16536

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Friedman

    A. Friedman . Partial differential equations of parabolic type. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1964, xiv+347

    1964

  28. [36]

    Gerencs \'e r and M

    M. Gerencs \'e r and M. Hairer . A solution theory for quasilinear singular spdes. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 72, no. 9, (2019), 1983--2005. doi:10.1002/cpa.21816 https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpa.21816

    2019 doi

  29. [37]

    Gerencs \'e r and M

    M. Gerencs \'e r and M. Hairer . Boundary renormalisation of SPDEs . Communications in Partial Differential Equations 47, no. 10, (2022), 2070--2123. doi:10.1080/03605302.2022.2109173 https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03605302.2022.2109173

    2022

  30. [38]

    Gerasimovi c s , M

    A. Gerasimovi c s , M. Hairer , and K. Matetski . Directed mean curvature flow in noisy environment. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 77, no. 3, (2024), 1850--1939. doi:10.1002/cpa.22158 https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpa.22158

    2024 doi

  31. [39]

    Gubinelli , P

    M. Gubinelli , P. Imkeller , and N. Perkowski . Paracontrolled distributions and singular pdes. In Forum of Mathematics, Pi, vol. 3, e6. Cambridge University Press, 2015. doi:10.1017/fmp.2015.2 https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/fmp.2015.2

    2015 doi

  32. [40]

    D. Grieser . Notes On Heat Kernel Asymptotics , 2004

    2004

  33. [41]

    M. Hairer . A theory of regularity structures. Inventiones mathematicae 198, no. 2, (2014), 269--504. doi:10.1007/s00222-014-0505-4 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00222-014-0505-4

    2014 doi

  34. [42]

    Hairer and C

    M. Hairer and C. Labb\' e . A simple construction of the continuum parabolic A nderson model on R ^2 . Electron. Commun. Probab. 20, (2015), no. 43, 11. doi:10.1214/ECP.v20-4038 https://dx.doi.org/10.1214/ECP.v20-4038

    2015 doi

  35. [43]

    Hairer and C

    M. Hairer and C. Labb \'e . The reconstruction theorem in Besov spaces. Journal of Functional Analysis 273, no. 8, (2017), 2578--2618. doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2017.07.002 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfa.2017.07.002

    2017 doi

  36. [44]

    Hairer and H

    M. Hairer and H. Singh . Regularity structures on manifolds and vector bundles. arXiv preprint (2023). arXiv:2308.05049 https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.05049

    2023 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Hairer and R

    M. Hairer and R. Steele . The bphz theorem for regularity structures via the spectral gap inequality. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 248, no. 1, (2024), 9. doi:10.1007/s00205-023-01946-w https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00205-023-01946-w

    2024 doi

  38. [46]

    Hairer and H

    M. Hairer and H. Singh . Periodic space-time homogenisation of the ^4_2 equation. Journal of Functional Analysis 288, no. 5, (2025), 110762. doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2024.110762 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfa.2024.110762

    2025

  39. [47]

    Z. Hao , X. Zhang , R. Zhu , and X. Zhu . Singular kinetic equations and applications. The Annals of Probability 52, no. 2, (2024), 576--657. doi:10.1214/23-AOP1666 https://dx.doi.org/10.1214/23-AOP1666

    2024 doi

  40. [48]

    Kupiainen

    A. Kupiainen . Renormalization Group and Stochastic PDEs . Annales Henri Poincar \'e 17, no. 3, (2016), 497--535. doi:10.1007/s00023-015-0408-y https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00023-015-0408-y

    2016 doi

  41. [49]

    Linares , F

    P. Linares , F. Otto , and M. Tempelmayr . The structure group for quasi-linear equations via universal enveloping algebras. Comm. Amer. Math. Soc. 3, (2023), 1--64. doi:10.1090/cams/16 https://dx.doi.org/10.1090/cams/16

    2023 doi

  42. [50]

    Linares , F

    P. Linares , F. Otto , M. Tempelmayr , and P. Tsatsoulis . A diagram-free approach to the stochastic estimates in regularity structures. Invent. Math. 237, no. 3, (2024), 1469--1565. doi:10.1007/s00222-024-01275-z https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00222-024-01275-z

    2024 doi

  43. [51]

    A. Mouzard . Weyl law for the A nderson H amiltonian on a two-dimensional manifold. Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincare (B) Probabilites et statistiques 58, no. 3, (2022), 1385--1425. doi:10.1214/21-AIHP1216 https://dx.doi.org/10.1214/21-AIHP1216

    2022 doi

  44. [52]

    Mayorcas and H

    A. Mayorcas and H. Singh . Singular spdes on homogeneous lie groups. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Section A Mathematics (2025), 1–72. doi:10.1017/prm.2025.1 https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/prm.2025.1

    2025 doi

  45. [53]

    Moinat and H

    A. Moinat and H. Weber . Space- T ime L ocalisation for the D ynamic ^4 M odel. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 73, no. 12, (2020), 2519--2555. doi:10.1002/cpa.21925 https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpa.21925

    2020 doi

  46. [54]

    Otto , J

    F. Otto , J. Sauer , S. A. Smith , and H. Weber . A priori bounds for quasi-linear SPDEs in the full subcritical regime. Journal of the European Mathematical Society (2024). doi:10.4171/jems/1574 https://dx.doi.org/10.4171/jems/1574

    2024 doi

  47. [55]

    H. Singh . Canonical solutions to non-translation invariant singular spdes. Electronic Journal of Probability 30, (2025), 1--24. doi:10.1214/25-EJP1315 https://dx.doi.org/10.1214/25-EJP1315

    2025 doi

  48. [56]

    Tempelmayr

    M. Tempelmayr . Characterizing models in regularity structures: a quasi-linear case. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields (2024). doi:10.1007/s00440-024-01292-2 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00440-024-01292-2

    2024 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.