Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 43 references

B-fields And dust in interstelLar fiLAments using Dust POLarization (BALLAD-POL): IV. Grain alignment mechanisms in Cocoon Nebula (IC 5146) using polarization observations from JCMT/POL-2

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Polarization holes in the Cocoon Nebula trace lost radiative-torque alignment of dust grains.

desk verdict Credible RAT-A confirmation in a new filament; the tangling exclusion is the soft spot a referee should press on. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.07205 v1 pith:764573P3 submitted 2025-07-09 astro-ph.GA

Saikhom Pravash , Thiem Hoang , Archana Soam , Eun Jung Chung , Pham Ngoc Diep , Nguyen Bich Ngoc , Le Ngoc Tram This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords interstellardustgrainalignmentradiativetorquespolarizationfractionholemagneticfieldtanglingIC5146submillimeterpolarimetry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks why dust polarization is weaker in the denser parts of two filaments in the Cocoon Nebula (IC 5146), a pattern called the polarization hole. Using 850 micron polarized thermal dust emission from JCMT/POL-2, the authors find that the polarization fraction $P$ falls with total intensity $I$ and column density $N({\rm H}_2)$, and that this fall is not matched by any significant increase in the polarization angle dispersion function $S$. They conclude that the hole is mainly a decrease in the efficiency of radiative-torque alignment in dense, radiation-shielded gas, and that this is strong evidence for the RAT-A mechanism; they also report tentative hints that magnetically enhanced RAT alignment (M-RAT) contributes in parts of the F13 filament. A sympathetic reader would care because it separates two competing explanations for a widely observed depolarization feature and turns it into a diagnostic of grain alignment rather than of field disorder.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the minimum alignment size $a_{\rm align}$: the smallest grain size that radiative torques can spin up to suprathermal rotation at which gas collisions can no longer randomize it. The paper computes it from the analytical RAT formula (their Eq. 5), in which $a_{\rm align}$ grows with gas density as $n_{\rm H}^{2/7}$ and shrinks as the radiation field strength rises as $U^{-2/7}$, so denser and more shielded gas aligns only the largest grains. The polarization fraction is then set by the width of the aligned size distribution between $a_{\rm align}$ and $a_{\rm max}$; a larger $a_{\rm align}$ means fewer aligned grains and lower $P$. To separate alignment loss from field tangling, the paper uses the polarization angle dispersion function $S$ (their Eq. 2) and the product $P\times S$, taken from the Planck analysis convention, as a proxy for the average alignment efficiency along the line of sight.

What would settle it

A concrete test would determine the three-dimensional orientation and depth of F13 and F13S, for example with velocity-resolved molecular-line observations that reveal whether the filaments are cylinders seen side-on, sheets seen edge-on, or inclined, and then recompute $a_{\rm align}$ with the corrected depth. If the anticorrelation between $P$ and $a_{\rm align}$ weakens or vanishes, or if the angle dispersion function becomes the controlling parameter, the claim that RAT-A drives the polarization hole here would be refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the F13 and F13S filaments of IC 5146, the paper claims the polarization hole is produced by a drop in grain-alignment efficiency, not by magnetic field tangling. The evidence is a chain of correlations: $P$ decreases with $I$ and $N({\rm H}_2)$ in every region; the angle dispersion function $S$ shows no significant correlation with $P$; the product $P\times S$, a proxy for the mean alignment efficiency along the line of sight, falls with $I$ and $N({\rm H}_2)$ in the same way $P$ does; and the minimum alignment size $a_{\rm align}$ computed from RAT theory rises with $I$, with both $P$ and $P\times S$ falling as $a_{\rm align}$ rises. The paper reads these as the empirical signature of RAT-A in starless gas: the external radiation from the B0 star BD+46 and the diffuse interstellar radiation field is attenuated in dense gas, grains cannot reach suprathermal rotation, and a narrower range of grain sizes stays aligned. At 24 pixels where magnetic field strengths are available, the magnetic relaxation strength $\delta_{\rm mag}$ exceeds 10 in parts of F13 where $P$ reaches 5-8%, which the paper offers as potential evidence that the magnetically enhanced RAT (M-RAT) mechanism contributes there, while the weak-field F13S filament is explained by RATs alone.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that each filament's depth along the line of sight equals its projected width (0.32 pc for F13, 0.23 pc for F13S) and that gas temperature equals dust temperature; every $a_{\rm align}$ value inherits these choices, and if the true depth is different the correlations that carry the RAT-A conclusion would change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The polarization hole in starless filaments can be read as a diagnostic of decreasing grain-alignment efficiency rather than of magnetic field disorder along the line of sight.
  • Maps of the minimum alignment size $a_{\rm align}$ become a probe of how radiation is attenuated inside dense filaments, since $a_{\rm align}$ rises with density and falls with radiation strength.
  • The RAT-A test extends to a new environment, a B-star-illuminated filamentary nebula, after similar findings in other dense cold filaments, suggesting the mechanism may be general in starless dense gas.
  • Where polarization fractions exceed about 5-8%, radiative torques alone may not be enough, and magnetic relaxation (M-RAT) must be included in modeling grain alignment.
  • The prediction that $P$ increases with dust temperature can be checked with resolved multi-wavelength observations of other starless filaments.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An explicit extension the paper does not pursue: if the cylindrical-depth assumption fails for these filaments, then every $a_{\rm align}$ value changes; measuring the true line-of-sight depth (e.g. via velocity-resolved molecular-line data) would be the sharpest test of whether the $P$-$a_{\rm align}$ anticorrelation is real.
  • The same $S$ and $P\times S$ decomposition could be applied to other starless filaments observed at multiple wavelengths; RAT-A predicts the polarization hole should deepen where radiation attenuation is strongest, independent of the local turbulence spectrum.
  • Because the M-RAT evidence rests on only 24 pixels, a targeted survey measuring plane-of-sky field strengths at many more positions in F13 could convert the current hints into a testable claim: pixels with $\delta_{\rm mag}>10$ and low $a_{\rm align}$ should show $P$ above the RAT-only prediction.
  • The measured power-law slopes, $P\propto I^{-0.7}$ to $I^{-0.9}$ and $P\propto N({\rm H}_2)^{-1.6}$ to $N({\rm H}_2)^{-1.7}$, are quantitative targets that radiative-transfer models coupling RAT alignment with self-consistent radiation fields should reproduce.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses archival JCMT/POL-2 850 μm polarized dust emission observations of the F13 and F13S filaments in IC 5146 to investigate the origin of the observed polarization hole. It reports that the polarization fraction P decreases with total intensity I and gas column density N(H2), increases with dust temperature Td (with region-dependent caveats), and is only weakly correlated with the polarization angle dispersion S. The authors estimate the minimum alignment size aalign from RAT theory using local n_H and Td and find that aalign increases with I and that P and P×S decrease with aalign. They conclude that the polarization hole is mainly due to reduced RAT alignment efficiency in denser gas rather than to magnetic field tangling, and they report tentative evidence for the M-RAT mechanism from 24 pixels with magnetic field strength estimates.

Significance. If the central conclusion holds, the paper would strengthen the case that RAT-A is the dominant cause of polarization holes in dense, starless filaments, extending a growing body of work from G11.11−0.12 and Musca to IC 5146. The manuscript has concrete strengths: it uses archival POL-2 data with a clear selection procedure, checks that including 2<S/N<3 data does not change the main trends, uses weighted fits, and constructs the aalign map from a theoretical formula rather than fitting it to P. The aalign-based comparison is therefore not circular in the narrow sense. The main weakness is that the exclusion of magnetic field tangling is not quantitatively demonstrated: the S statistic only probes plane-of-sky angle dispersion, and no model is given for how much depolarization the measured S could produce along the line of sight. The M-RAT section is appropriately hedged but rests on very few pixels. Overall the paper addresses a question of current interest, but the strongest claim needs additional analysis to be fully supported.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.1.3, Fig. 8, §4.1.1] The conclusion that the polarization hole is 'not significantly influenced by magnetic field tangling' is not quantitatively demonstrated. The statistic S defined in Eq. (2) measures plane-of-sky polarization angle dispersion within a radius δ ≈ 2 beams; line-of-sight field tangling can depolarize thermal dust emission without increasing S. Therefore the weak P–S correlation in Fig. 8(a) and the P×S trends in Fig. 8(b)–(d) cannot by themselves rule out a tangling contribution to the observed P–I and P–N(H2) slopes. The paper would need a quantitative test, such as comparing the observed P–I and P–N(H2) slopes with those predicted by a tangling-only model constructed from the measured S distribution, or a joint model of alignment and tangling. Relying on the cited sub-Alfvénic result from Chung et al. (2024) is not a substitute for this test.
  2. [§3.2.1, Eq. (5), Fig. 11] The P–aalign and P×S–aalign correlations are not fully independent of the earlier P–N(H2) and P–Td correlations. The alignment size aalign in Eq. (5) depends on n_H = N(H2)/d and on U, which is derived from Td, while P is already shown to decrease with N(H2) (Fig. 6c–d) and to increase with Td in two of the regions (Fig. 7). Consequently, an anti-correlation between P and aalign is expected even before invoking new physics. The paper should clarify which part of the P–aalign relation is an additional test of RAT-A beyond the P–N and P–Td relations, for example by comparing the observed slopes with a model that varies only aalign while holding other alignment parameters fixed.
  3. [§2.2, Eq. (1), §3.2.1] The conversion n(H2)=N(H2)/d assumes the filaments are cylinders with depths equal to their projected widths (0.32 pc for F13, 0.23 pc for F13S) and the cores are spheres. This depth enters every aalign value through the n_H^{2/7} term in Eq. (5), and the aalign–I and P–aalign correlations are central evidence for RAT-A. If the true line-of-sight depths differ from the assumed widths, the aalign map changes and the slopes in Figs. 10 and 11 would shift. The authors acknowledge the geometry assumption, but they do not quantify its effect on the central conclusion; a sensitivity test varying d over a plausible range would materially strengthen the paper. The additional approximation T_gas = T_d in Eq. (5) should also be discussed in this context.
  4. [§3.3, Fig. 12] The M-RAT analysis is based on only 24 pixels with B_POS estimates, and the authors appropriately describe the findings as 'potential hints.' However, the interpretation of high P in these pixels as evidence for enhanced magnetic relaxation is not backed by a quantitative comparison between RAT-only and M-RAT predictions for the same physical conditions. Given the small pixel count and the dependence of δmag,sp on the assumed N_cl, φ_sp, and B_tot scaling, the current analysis is suggestive rather than quantitative. I recommend either adding such a comparison or further softening the abstract's wording so that the M-RAT claim is clearly presented as tentative.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§3.2.1, Figs. 9–11] The aalign map is shown without propagated uncertainties, and the power-law fits in Figs. 10 and 11 treat aalign as error-free. Since aalign is derived from noisy N(H2) and Td maps, reporting at least representative uncertainties or a sensitivity test would improve the quantitative interpretation.
  2. [§3.1.2, Fig. 7, conclusion 1] The statement that P increases with Td 'in each region' overstates the F13N result, whose fitted slope is negative within uncertainties (−1.37 ± 1.16 for S/N>2). The text in §3.1.2 is more careful, but the conclusion should reflect the flat/weakly increasing behavior in F13N.
  3. [§2.1, Table 2] Reporting the number of data points in each region and the degrees of freedom for the weighted fits would help the reader assess the statistical robustness of the slopes in Table 2, especially for F13N where the sample appears smaller.
  4. [General] The phrase 'strong evidence for RAT-A mechanism' in the abstract and conclusion is stronger than what the confounding analysis described above supports; phrases such as 'consistent with RAT-A' or 'supportive of RAT-A' would be more proportionate at this stage.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

The core RAT-A test is partly independent, but the tangling exclusion is made via P×S, which the authors themselves say tracks P 'nearly similar,' and the aalign–I 'prediction' is largely generated by the adopted Eq. (5) and input maps.

  1. renaming known result [Section 3.1.3, Fig. 8(b)-(c); restated in Conclusion 2]
    "Then, we study the variations of the averaged alignment efficiency P × S with increasing I and N (H2) as shown in panels (b) and (c) of Figure 8. We find that P × S decreases with the increase in both I and N (H2) nearly similar to the decrease in P with I and N (H2) which implies that the grain alignment efficiency decreases in the denser regions."

    P×S is defined as the averaged grain-alignment efficiency (Planck Collaboration et al. 2020), and the paper finds only a weak P–S correlation. Therefore, by the paper's own statement, the P×S–I and P×S–N(H2) trends are 'nearly similar' to the P–I and P–N(H2) polarization-hole trends. The conclusion that 'grain alignment efficiency decreases in the denser regions' is thus, up to the weak S dependence, a restatement of the already-measured polarization hole under the new label P×S, rather than an independent test that separates tangling from alignment effects.

  2. self definitional [Section 3.2.1 (Eq. 5) and Section 4.1.3, Fig. 10]
    "Equation 5 shows that aalign varies with the radiation field strength U or equivalently the dust temperature Td as U −2/7 and with the gas volume density nH as n2/7 H. ... We find that the value aalign is well correlated with the intensity (see Figure 10) which means the alignment size increases in denser regions. The increasing of alignment size with intensity when no internal radiation source is present is an expectation of RAT-A theory."

    The claimed confirmation that aalign increases with I is built into the adopted definition: aalign is computed from Eq. (5) using nH = N(H2)/d and U ≈ (Td/16.4 K)^6, while the paper's own Fig. 5 shows Td decreasing with N(H2). Hence aalign increasing with I follows from the formula plus assumed cylindrical depths, not from the polarization data. Presenting this computed correlation as an 'expectation of RAT-A theory' that is 'well correlated' is a self-consistency check rather than an independent prediction. The P–aalign anti-correlation then largely mirrors the observed P–I anti-correlation through this constructed aalign–I trend.

full rationale

The central claim is not fully circular: aalign is calculated from Eq. (5) using nH and Td maps, not fitted to the polarization fraction P, and the observed P–aalign and P×S–aalign anti-correlations retain independent observational content. However, two load-bearing steps are partially self-referential. First, the exclusion of magnetic-field tangling rests on P×S, which is dominated by P; the paper admits the P×S trends are 'nearly similar' to the P trends, so the conclusion that alignment efficiency decreases in dense regions partly restates the measured polarization hole. Second, the aalign–I correlation is generated by Eq. (5) itself combined with the observed Td–N(H2) anti-correlation and assumed cylindrical geometry, so it is not an independent confirmation of RAT-A. The sub-Alfvénic support cited from Chung et al. (2024) is a same-team companion result, but it is not itself fitted to the target claim and does not by itself raise the circularity score. Overall, the derivation is partially reduced to its inputs but not equivalent to them, so a moderate score of 4 is appropriate.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rely on the RAT-A theory equations from Hoang et al. 2021 and on a set of modeling choices: gamma=0.3, cylindrical filament geometry, T_gas=T_d, and the U-Td relation. None of these are fitted to the polarization data, so the aalign test is not a fit, but they are not independently verified either. The M-RAT discussion adds free microphysical parameters (N_cl, phi_sp) and a scaling factor for B_tot.

free parameters (6)
  • gamma (anisotropy degree) = 0.3
    Set to 0.3 instead of the diffuse-ISM value 0.1 to account for the nearby B-type star BD+46; enters Eq. 5 as (gamma/0.1)^(-2/7) and scales aalign.
  • filament depth d for n_H = 0.32 pc (F13), 0.23 pc (F13S)
    Assumed equal to the filament widths from Chung et al. 2024; n_H = N(H2)/d, and aalign depends on n_H^(2/7).
  • T_gas = set equal to T_d
    Assumed thermal equilibrium between gas and dust; no independent gas temperature measurement is used in Eq. 5.
  • N_cl (iron atoms per cluster) = 100
    Chosen for super-paramagnetic grains in the M-RAT calculation (Eq. 6); delta_mag scales with N_cl, so the M-RAT hints depend on this choice.
  • phi_sp (volume filling factor of iron clusters) = 0.01
    Chosen from Hoang & Lazarian 2016; multiplies delta_mag in Eq. 6.
  • B_tot scaling factor = 1.3 x B_POS
    Conversion of plane-of-sky field to total field (Crutcher et al. 2004); enters delta_mag as B^2.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Radiative torque alignment theory (RAT-A) and Eq. 5 for aalign are correct (Hoang et al. 2021).
    Used in Section 3.2.1 to map aalign; if this theory is wrong, the interpretation of the polarization hole as reduced RAT alignment fails.
  • domain assumption P x S measures average grain alignment efficiency (Planck Collaboration et al. 2020).
    Used in Section 3.1.3 to separate tangling from alignment; if P x S is not a valid estimator, the conclusion that tangling is minor is unsupported.
  • domain assumption Filaments are cylinders with depth equal to projected width; cores are spheres.
    Section 2.2, Eq. 1; affects n_H and thus aalign via n_H^(2/7).
  • domain assumption Gas and dust are thermally coupled, T_gas = T_d.
    Section 3.2.1, used in Eq. 5; if gas is colder or hotter, aalign changes.
  • domain assumption Radiation field strength U is derived from T_d via the silicate-grain relation U = (T_d/16.4 K)^6, and only ISRF plus BD+46 contribute.
    Section 3.2.1; if embedded heating sources were present, U and aalign would be misestimated.
  • ad hoc to paper Standard dust parameters (rho_d=3 g/cm3, lambda_bar=1.2 um, gamma=0.3) are used in Eq. 5.
    gamma=0.3 is chosen because of the nearby B star, not measured; it changes aalign by a factor (0.3/0.1)^(-2/7).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of B-fields And dust in interstelLar fiLAments using Dust POLarization (BALLAD-POL): IV. Grain alignment mechanisms in Cocoon Nebula (IC 5146) using polarization observations from JCMT/POL-2." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/764573P3

@misc{pith2026250707205,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: B-fields And dust in interstelLar fiLAments using Dust POLarization (BALLAD-POL): IV. Grain alignment mechanisms in Cocoon Nebula (IC 5146) using polarization observations from JCMT/POL-2},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/764573P3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.07205}
}
abstract

The polarization of starlight and thermal dust emission from aligned non-spherical grains provides a powerful tool for tracing magnetic field morphologies and strengths in diffuse interstellar medium to star-forming regions, and constraining dust grain properties and their alignment mechanisms. However, the physics of grain alignment is not yet fully understood. The alignment based on RAdiative Torques (RATs), known as RAT Alignment or RAT-A mechanism is the most acceptable mechanism. In this work, we investigate the grain alignment mechanisms in F13 (F13N and F13C) and F13S filamentary regions of the Cocoon Nebula (IC 5146) using polarized thermal dust emission observations from JCMT/POL-2 at 850 $\mu$m. We find that the polarization fraction decreases with increasing total intensity and gas column density in each region, termed as polarization hole. We investigate for any role of magnetic field tangling on the observed polarization hole by estimating the polarization angle dispersion function. Our study finds that the polarization hole is not significantly influenced by magnetic field tangling, but majorly due to decrease in RAT alignment efficiency of grains in denser regions. To test whether RAT-A mechanism can reproduce the observational results, we estimate minimum alignment size of grains using RAT theory. Our study finds strong evidence for RAT-A mechanism that can explain the polarization hole. We also find potential hints that the observed higher polarization fractions in some regions of F13 filament can be due to combined effects of both suprathermal rotation by RATs and enhanced magnetic relaxation, supporting the Magnetically-Enhanced RAT (M-RAT) mechanism.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.07205 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Maps of H2 volume density (left) and dust temperature (right) for the F13 and F13S filaments of the Cocoon nebula. The locations of the cores C1, C2, C3, C4 in the F13 filament and C5, C6 and C7 in the F13S filament as identified by Chung et al. (2024) are indicated. The contours are drawn at total intensity I values of 12, 40, 80, 120 and 200 mJy/beam. The star symbol denotes the location of BD+46◦ 3474 (BD+46) [P… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Total emission intensity (I) map of the F13, F13S and F13W filaments of the Cocoon nebula observed by JCMT/POL-2 at 850µm with overlaid contours drawn at I values of 12, 40, 80, 120 and 200 mJy/beam. The positions of the dense cores C1, C2, C3, C4 in the F13 filament and C5, C6 and C7 in the F13S filaments are indicated with white circles and labelled with green colors. The dashed small and large black circles are d… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. shows the distribution of the polarization vec￾tors overplotted on the total intensity map. The lengths of the vectors are proportional to the polarization frac￾tion P and their orientations determine the magnetic field orientations. A reference scale length of P is indi￾cated in the Figure. We see that the value of P is large in the outer regions having small intensities and decreases in the inner regions associate… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Histograms of the polarization fraction P for the F13N, F13C, F13S regions and the combined regions of the F13 and F13S filaments for P/σP > 2 (left) and P/σP ≥ 3 (right). The solid green, magenta and black lines are for the F13N, F13C and F13S regions respectively. Th…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Variation of dust temperature with gas column density in each region. −1.88±0.25, −1.67±0.08 and −1.79±0.17 for S/N ≥ 3. Here also, inclusion of 2 < S/N < 3 data points does not significantly affect the observed trends. We see that P decreases with the increase in both…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Variations of (a) P with I for P/σP > 2, (b) P with I for P/σP ≥ 3, (c) P with N(H2) for P/σP > 2, (d) P with N(H2) for P/σP ≥ 3. The white facecolor data points are the data points associated with 2 < P/σP < 3. The solid lines are the weighted best power-law fits. The…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Variations of P with Td (a) for P/σP > 2 and (b) for P/σP ≥ 3. The white facecolor data points are the data points associated with 2 < P/σP < 3. The dashed lines are the weighted running means and the solid lines are the weighted best power-law fits. higher polarizatio…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Variations of (a) P with S, (b) P × S with I, (c) P × S with N(H2) and (d) P × S with Td. The dashed lines are the weighted running means and the solid lines are the weighted best power-law fits. ment of the grains can be achieved only when they ro￾tate suprathermally …
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Map of the minimum alignment size of grains, aalign (left) and the histograms of aalign in each of the F13N, F13C and F13S regions (right). The vertical dotted green, magenta and black lines denote the median values of aalign in F13N, F13C and F13S regions, respectivel…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Variations of aalign with the total intensity I in each of the regions. The dashed lines are the running means and the solid lines are the best power-law fits. We use ρd = 3 gcm−3 , λ¯ = 1.2 µm, nH = 2n(H2) where n(H2) is the volume density of molecular hydrogen gas a…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Variations of P with aalign (left) and P × S with aalign (right). The dashed lines are the weighted running means and the solid lines are the weighted best power-law fits [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Map of magnetic relaxation strength δmag,sp with overlaid gray polarization vectors (left) and the relation between polarization fraction P and δmag,sp (right) in each region for only 24 pixels in total having estimated values of magnetic field strengths. The length o…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2016, A&A, 595, A57, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628809

    Alina, D., Montier, L., Ristorcelli, I., et al. 2016, A&A, 595, A57, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628809

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628809 2016

  2. [2]

    G., Lazarian, A., & Vaillancourt, J

    Andersson, B. G., Lazarian, A., & Vaillancourt, J. E. 2015, ARA&A, 53, 501, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122414 Andr´ e, P., Men’shchikov, A., Bontemps, S., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L102, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014666

    doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122414 2015

  3. [3]

    2011, A&A, 529, L6, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201116596 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T

    Arzoumanian, D., Andr´ e, P., Didelon, P., et al. 2011, A&A, 529, L6, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201116596 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201116596 2011

  4. [4]

    Berry, D. S. 2015, Astronomy and Computing, 10, 22, doi: 10.1016/j.ascom.2014.11.004

    doi:10.1016/j.ascom.2014.11.004 2015

  5. [5]

    Synthetic Modelling of Polarized Dust Emission in Intermediate-Mass YSOs: I: Constraining the Role of Iron Inclusions and Inelastic Relaxation on Grain Alignment with ALMA Polarization

    Bethell, T. J., Chepurnov, A., Lazarian, A., & Kim, J. 2007, ApJ, 663, 1055, doi: 10.1086/516622 Chau Giang, N., Le Gouellec, V. J. M., Hoang, T., Maury, A. J., & Hennebelle, P. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.10079, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2407.10079

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.10079 2007

  6. [6]

    J., Lee, C

    Chung, E. J., Lee, C. W., Kim, S., et al. 2024, ApJ, 970, 122, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4f85 18 —. 2021, ApJ, 919, 3, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0881

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad4f85 2024

  7. [7]

    Crutcher, R. M. 2012, ARA&A, 50, 29, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125514

    doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125514 2012

  8. [8]

    Kirk, J. M. 2004, ApJ, 600, 279, doi: 10.1086/379705

    doi:10.1086/379705 2004

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    Davis, Leverett, J., & Greenstein, J. L. 1951, ApJ, 114, 206, doi: 10.1086/145464

    1951 doi

  2. [10]

    Z., & Mitrofanov, I

    Dolginov, A. Z., & Mitrofanov, I. G. 1976, Ap&SS, 43, 291, doi: 10.1007/BF00640010

    1976 doi

  3. [11]

    Draine, B. T. 2003, ARA&A, 41, 241, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.41.011802.094840 —. 2011, Physics of the Interstellar and Intergalactic Medium

    2003 arXiv

  4. [12]

    T., & Hensley, B

    Draine, B. T., & Hensley, B. S. 2021, ApJ, 919, 65, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0050

    2021 doi

  5. [13]

    T., & Weingartner, J

    Draine, B. T., & Weingartner, J. C. 1997, ApJ, 480, 633, doi: 10.1086/304008 Falceta-Gon¸ calves, D., Lazarian, A., & Kowal, G. 2008, ApJ, 679, 537, doi: 10.1086/587479

    1997 doi

  6. [14]

    2016, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Friberg, P., Bastien, P., Berry, D., et al. 2016, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9914, Millimeter, Submillimeter, and Far-Infrared Detectors and Instrumentation for Astronomy VIII, ed. W. S. Holland & J. Zmuidzinas, 991403,...

    2016 doi

  7. [15]

    Hall, J. S. 1949, Science, 109, 166, doi: 10.1126/science.109.2825.166

    1949 doi

  8. [16]

    H., & Reipurth, B

    Herbig, G. H., & Reipurth, B. 2008, in Handbook of Star Forming Regions, Volume I, ed. B. Reipurth, Vol. 4, 108

    2008

  9. [17]

    2021, ApJ, 913, 63, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abf096

    Herranen, J., Lazarian, A., & Hoang, T. 2021, ApJ, 913, 63, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abf096

    2021 doi

  10. [18]

    Hildebrand, R. H. 1988, QJRAS, 29, 327

    1988

  11. [19]

    Hiltner, W. A. 1949, ApJ, 109, 471, doi: 10.1086/145151

    1949 doi

  12. [20]

    2008, MNRAS, 388, 117, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13249.x —

    Hoang, T., & Lazarian, A. 2008, MNRAS, 388, 117, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13249.x —. 2014, MNRAS, 438, 680, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt2240 —. 2016, ApJ, 831, 159, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/831/2/159

    2008

  13. [21]

    N., Lee, H., Diep, P

    Hoang, T., Tram, L. N., Lee, H., Diep, P. N., & Ngoc, N. B. 2021, ApJ, 908, 218, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abd54f

    2021 doi

  14. [22]

    N., Minh Phan, V

    Hoang, T., Tram, L. N., Minh Phan, V. H., et al. 2022, AJ, 164, 248, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac9af5

    2022 doi

  15. [23]

    2024, ApJ, 965, 183, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2a56

    Hoang, T., & Truong, B. 2024, ApJ, 965, 183, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2a56

    2024 doi

  16. [24]

    Jones, T. J. 1989, ApJ, 346, 728, doi: 10.1086/168054

    1989 doi

  17. [25]

    J., Klebe, D., & Dickey, J

    Jones, T. J., Klebe, D., & Dickey, J. M. 1992, ApJ, 389, 602, doi: 10.1086/171233

    1992 doi

  18. [26]

    2023, ApJ, 948, 109, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acc462

    Kaminsky, A., Bonne, L., Arzoumanian, D., & Coud´ e, S. 2023, ApJ, 948, 109, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acc462

    2023 doi

  19. [27]

    2007, JQSRT, 106, 225, doi: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2007.01.038

    Lazarian, A. 2007, JQSRT, 106, 225, doi: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2007.01.038

    2007 doi

  20. [28]

    G., & Hoang, T

    Lazarian, A., Andersson, B. G., & Hoang, T. 2015, in Polarimetry of Stars and Planetary Systems, ed. L. Kolokolova, J. Hough, & A.-C. Levasseur-Regourd, 81, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1511.03696

    2015 doi arXiv

  21. [29]

    2007, MNRAS, 378, 910, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11817.x

    Lazarian, A., & Hoang, T. 2007, MNRAS, 378, 910, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11817.x

    2007

  22. [30]

    2020, ApJ, 896, 44, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8e33

    Lee, H., Hoang, T., Le, N., & Cho, J. 2020, ApJ, 896, 44, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8e33

    2020 doi

  23. [31]

    Myers, P. C. 2017, ApJ, 838, 10, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa5fa8

    2017 doi

  24. [32]

    B., Hoang, T., Diep, P

    Ngoc, N. B., Hoang, T., Diep, P. N., & Tram, L. N. 2024, ApJ, 974, 118, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6a5e

    2024 doi

  25. [33]

    B., Diep, P

    Ngoc, N. B., Diep, P. N., Hoang, T., et al. 2023, ApJ, 953, 66, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acdb6e

    2023 doi

  26. [34]

    2013, A&A, 550, A38, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220500

    Palmeirim, P., Andr´ e, P., Kirk, J., et al. 2013, A&A, 550, A38, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220500

    2013 doi

  27. [35]

    V., Clark, S

    Panopoulou, G. V., Clark, S. E., Hacar, A., et al. 2022, A&A, 657, L13, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142281

    2022 doi

  28. [36]

    2019, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 6, 15, doi: 10.3389/fspas.2019.00015 Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., et al

    Pattle, K., & Fissel, L. 2019, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 6, 15, doi: 10.3389/fspas.2019.00015 Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., et al. 2020, A&A, 641, A12, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833885

    2019

  29. [37]

    N., et al

    Pravash, S., Soam, A., Diep, P. N., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2501.11634, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2501.11634

    2025 doi arXiv

  30. [38]

    Purcell, E. M. 1979, ApJ, 231, 404, doi: 10.1086/157204

    1979 doi

  31. [39]

    1959, ApJS, 4, 257, doi: 10.1086/190049

    Sharpless, S. 1959, ApJS, 4, 257, doi: 10.1086/190049

    1959 doi

  32. [40]

    N., & Hoang, T

    Tram, L. N., & Hoang, T. 2022, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 9, 923927, doi: 10.3389/fspas.2022.923927

    2022

  33. [41]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.14896, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2407.14896

    Truong, B., & Hoang, T. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.14896, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2407.14896

    2024 doi arXiv

  34. [42]

    E., et al

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, Nature Methods, 17, 261, doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

    2020 doi

  35. [43]

    P., et al

    Wang, J.-W., Lai, S.-P., Clemens, D. P., et al. 2020, ApJ, 888, 13, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5c1c

    2020 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.