Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 97 references

The Peculiar Mini-Halo in the Shapley Supercluster Member Abell 3558

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Multi-band radio and X-ray maps show that the diffuse radio emission in Abell 3558 is a peculiar mini-halo, larger than previously known and powered by sloshing-induced turbulence.

desk verdict A careful, useful mini-halo study whose headline spectral index and frequency-dependent correlation slope are both hostage to the authors' own unpropagated 40% uGMRT uv-cut discrepancy. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.07549 v1 pith:5UXHTAGZ submitted 2025-07-10 astro-ph.GA

K. S. Trehaeven , T. Venturi , O. Smirnov , G. Di Gennaro , M. Rossetti , S. Giacintucci , S. Bardelli , P. Merluzzi
show 4 more authors
S. P. Sikhosana D. Dallacasa R. Kale K. Knowles
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords galaxyclustersradiomini-halodiffuseemissiongassloshingparticleaccelerationAbell3558ShapleySuperclusterradio-X-raycorrelation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to establish that the faint diffuse radio glow at the centre of the galaxy cluster Abell 3558 is a peculiar mini-halo, not a giant halo or an imaging artefact. The claim rests on new MeerKAT UHF-band and uGMRT Band-3 maps combined with archival MeerKAT L-band and ASKAP data, all restored to a common 30-arcsecond beam after subtracting compact sources. The authors find that the emission spans about 550 kpc, larger than previously known thanks to a faint 100-kpc extension north of the inner cold front, and that its integrated spectral index between 400 MHz and 1569 MHz is $1.18 \pm 0.10$. They further show that the point-to-point radio-to-X-ray surface-brightness correlation is sublinear ($\langle k \rangle = 0.62 \pm 0.1$) and steepens with observing frequency, which they interpret as turbulent (re-)acceleration of fossil electrons. A reader should care because the object is only the third mini-halo with a sublinear correlation, it sits at the faint end of the mini-halo scaling relations, and it supports the view that minor mergers, through gas sloshing, can power and shape non-thermal emission in cluster cores.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the multi-band, point-source-subtracted radio data matched to X-ray maps at a common 30-arcsecond beam: uGMRT 400 MHz, MeerKAT UHF 816 MHz, ASKAP 887 MHz and MeerKAT L-band 1283 MHz continuum images, with compact emission modelled at roughly 7-arcsecond resolution and subtracted in the visibility plane (in the image plane for ASKAP). The load-bearing tool is the point-to-point correlation of radio surface brightness against X-ray surface brightness and thermodynamic maps, run with the PT-REX pipeline and fitted with a Bayesian regression; the slope $k$ of the $I_R \propto I_X^k$ relation and its radial and frequency dependence carry the physical interpretation. Supporting machinery includes the spectral index and curvature maps made from the six MeerKAT subbands, the adaptive Gaussian Gradient Method map that locates the cold-front edge, and the X-ray residual map from an elliptical double-$\beta$ model that exposes the sloshing spiral. These are combined with the mini-halo size definition (radius within $0.2\,R_{500}$) and the mini-halo radio-power scaling relations to reach the classification.

What would settle it

Re-image the uGMRT 400 MHz data with a uv-cut matched to the MeerKAT bands and remeasure the flux within the same $3\sigma$ region. If the recovered flux falls by roughly 40 percent, as the paper's own matching test indicates, the integrated spectral index steepens substantially from 1.18 and the claimed monotonic frequency trend of the radio-X-ray slope must be re-derived. A second decisive test is a deeper low-frequency observation at 250-400 MHz: a genuinely separate, aged northern extension should appear clearly there, whereas an artefact of differential uv-coverage should weaken or vanish.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the authors' own terms, the discovery is that the diffuse radio emission at the centre of Abell 3558 is a peculiar mini-halo: a core-confined, sloshing-shaped synchrotron source rather than a merger-driven giant halo. Three quantitative results carry the claim. First, the emission is larger than previously thought, with a projected largest linear size of roughly 550 kpc, because a faint extension of about 100 kpc is detected to the north, beyond the innermost cold front and into a hot, X-ray-deficient cavity of high pressure. Second, the integrated spectrum between 400 MHz and 1569 MHz is steep but not ultra-steep, $\alpha = 1.18 \pm 0.10$, revising the earlier value of $2.3 \pm 0.4$ derived from ASKAP and L-band data alone; the paper attributes the earlier value to biased ASKAP point-source subtraction. Third, the radio-to-X-ray surface-brightness correlation is sublinear with a mean slope $\langle k \rangle = 0.62$, unusual for a mini-halo, and the slope increases monotonically with frequency when the lowest-fidelity ASKAP point is excluded. The spatial pattern of the spectral index, with a flat strip at the cold front and a steep, aged region in the northern cavity, plus positive spectral curvature at both ends, is interpreted as turbulent (re-)acceleration of fossil electrons by sloshing motions induced by a minor merger with the group SC1327–312 at a mass ratio of roughly 5:1.

Load-bearing premise

The four radio datasets measure the same physical diffuse emission even though they sample the sky differently: the uGMRT 400 MHz image was made without the short-spacing cut applied to the MeerKAT data, and the paper itself reports that applying the matching cut removes about 40 percent of the recovered uGMRT flux, an effect that is not propagated into the quoted spectral-index and correlation-slope uncertainties.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The mini-halo classification places A3558 on the established mini-halo scaling relations for radio power versus X-ray luminosity and BCG radio power, at the faint end, showing that those relations hold down to powers near $7\times10^{22}$ W/Hz.
  • The sublinear mean correlation slope with a sublinear core that turns linear or superlinear in the outer regions matches the radial trend predicted by sloshing simulations of mini-halos.
  • The flat-spectrum strip coincident with the peak of the X-ray gradient just inside the cold front indicates that cold fronts themselves act as local sites of electron (re-)acceleration.
  • The positive spectral curvature at the northern and southern ends indicates electron ageing and argues against a single recent injection of particles as the sole explanation.
  • The electron age of roughly 40 Myr, two orders of magnitude below a typical merger timescale, supports continuous in-situ (re-)acceleration rather than one ancient injection.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the frequency-steepening of the radio-X-ray slope is a generic property of turbulent re-acceleration, the slope itself could serve as an independent spectral diagnostic of the acceleration physics in other halos and mini-halos, complementing the integrated spectrum.
  • The reported 40 percent flux loss when the uGMRT data are re-imaged with the MeerKAT uv-cut suggests that low-frequency diffuse-emission fluxes measured without such cuts may be systematically high; a cross-archive re-analysis of other halos could quantify how widespread this bias is.
  • The sloshing-shaping interpretation implies that the northern extension terminates somewhere within the large-scale sloshing spiral; a deep low-frequency map should be able to test that predicted boundary, which the current data are too shallow to trace.
  • If confirmed, A3558 would serve as a nearby template for the early phase of a 5:1 minor merger, where the geometry of the cold fronts and the radio morphology could be compared with simulations to constrain the merger impact parameter.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents a multi-frequency radio and X-ray study of the diffuse emission at the centre of Abell 3558, using new MeerKAT UHF-band and uGMRT Band-3 data together with previously published MeerKAT L-band and ASKAP 887 MHz images, complemented by archival XMM-Newton data. The authors report a previously undetected northern extension that increases the largest linear size of the emission to about 550 kpc, an integrated spectral index alpha = 1.18 +/- 0.10 between 400 and 1569 MHz, and a sub-linear point-to-point radio-X-ray surface brightness correlation whose slope apparently steepens with frequency. They interpret the source as a peculiar mini-halo powered by turbulent (re-)acceleration associated with gas sloshing caused by a minor merger with the group SC 1327-312. The analysis includes detailed compact-source subtraction, spectral index and curvature maps, radial profile fits, point-to-point correlation analyses, and comparisons with published mini-halo scaling relations.

Significance. If the quantitative results are robust, this paper is a valuable addition to the growing sample of anomalous or borderline mini-halos, and it provides one of the faintest mini-halos placed on the P_1.4GHz-L_X and P_1.4GHz-P_BCG scaling relations. The work is careful in many respects: the MeerKAT and uGMRT reductions are described in unusual detail, the compact-source subtraction is performed in the visibility plane for most datasets, the spectral index and curvature maps are used to connect the radio emission to X-ray sloshing features, and the authors explicitly test the effect of different uv-cuts on the uGMRT data. However, the central quantitative claims - the integrated spectral index and the frequency dependence of the I_R-I_X slope - currently rest on a 400 MHz measurement obtained with a different uv-range than the MeerKAT data, and the paper's own estimate of the resulting flux change is not propagated into the quoted uncertainties. This is a load-bearing issue that should be addressed before the qualitative conclusions are fully supported by the quantitative ones.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3.3, Table 3, Eq. (2), Section 5.2.1] The uGMRT 400 MHz flux density of 54.85 +/- 5.87 mJy listed in Table 3 is measured from an image made over the full uv-range, whereas the MeerKAT SRC-SUB images were made with a 0.2-18.3 klambda uv-cut. Section 3.3 states that matching the MeerKAT uv-range reduces the recovered uGMRT diffuse flux by approximately 40%. This systematic is not included in Eq. (2), whose terms are calibration, noise, and subtraction uncertainties only. A 40% reduction of the 400 MHz point shifts a two-point alpha(400/1283) from about 1.2 to about 0.8, several times the quoted +/-0.10 uncertainty, and will also shift the integrated spectral index fit in Figure 6. Because alpha = 1.18 +/- 0.10 is a headline result used to characterize the source as peculiar, the authors should either re-image the uGMRT residuals with the matched uv-cut and re-derive all affected quantities, or include a uv-coverage systematic term in Eq. (2) and demonstrate that the conclusions survive the shift.
  2. [Section 6.2, Table 6, Fig. 11] The same unmatched uGMRT image is used to derive the 400 MHz I_R-I_X slope k = 0.58 +/- 0.05 in Table 6. The claim that the correlation slope steepens monotonically with frequency is made after excluding the ASKAP 887 MHz point, leaving only three points (400, 816, 1283 MHz) in the linear fit shown in Figure 11. A 40% change in the uGMRT flux is not necessarily a uniform rescaling of the surface brightness distribution, so k(400) could shift significantly once the uv-cut is matched, and the monotonic trend could disappear. The paper should present k(400) from a matched-uv image or otherwise bound how much both the slope and the frequency trend can shift. Without this, the 'peculiar' sub-linear-and-steepening property of the correlation is not robustly established.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 4.1] The northern extension is described as 'just barely seen' in the uGMRT image and as detected in the MeerKAT data; since the reported 550 kpc largest linear size relies on this extension, a quantitative significance estimate for the extension in each band would help the reader judge how secure the size measurement is.
  2. [Section 5.2.1] The radio power P_1.4 GHz = 6.8 +/- 0.9 x 10^22 W/Hz is quoted without specifying whether it is derived from the fitted spectrum or directly from the 1283 MHz flux density; please state the calculation explicitly, since the value would change if the spectral index shifts.
  3. [Figure 11 and Section 6.2] The text says the correlation slopes 'exhibit a completely monotonic relationship with frequency' after ignoring ASKAP, but this is a fit to only three data points; the caption and text should state this limitation clearly and quote the significance of the trend without the 400 MHz point.
  4. [Section 3.3] When reporting that the matched uv-range reduces the uGMRT flux by about 40%, please specify the exact uv-range used in the comparison and whether the local noise in the matched-uv image was also recomputed; this would clarify whether the flux deficit reflects lost large-scale emission or simply a noisier image.
  5. [Table E1] The subtracted source list includes flux densities as low as 0.0006 mJy, well below the stated 18.5 microJy/beam noise of the high-resolution UHF image; please state the detection threshold used for inclusion and whether such faint entries are real sources or noise peaks that could affect the subtraction uncertainty estimate.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the spectral index and correlation slopes are measured quantities, and the mini-halo classification is checked against external scaling relations; the only flagged caveat is an unpropagated uv-filter systematic, not a circular step.

full rationale

The paper's central results are derived from direct measurements rather than from inputs that already contain the conclusions. The integrated spectral index alpha = 1.18 +/- 0.10 is a power-law fit to independent flux-density measurements listed in Table 3 and shown in Figure 6; it is not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The radio/X-ray surface brightness slopes k in Figure 10 are point-to-point regressions at each frequency, and the frequency trend in Figure 11 is an empirical fit to those slopes, so no equation reduces to itself. The mini-halo classification is supported by the externally defined size criterion of Giacintucci et al. (2017), the observed sloshing/cold-front morphology, and a posteriori agreement with the Giacintucci et al. (2019) scaling relations; these scaling relations are external samples used as a consistency check, not as the source of the classification. Self-citations such as Venturi et al. (2022) and Rossetti et al. (2007) provide data products and previously established X-ray measurements, not an imported uniqueness theorem that forces the conclusion. The one explicit internal caveat is in Section 3.3: 'using a similar UV-range as the MeerKAT data after subtraction (0.2-18.3 kλ) reduced the recovered flux from the diffuse emission by approximately 40%. Thus, we did not use a UV-cut when imaging the uGMRT residuals.' This is a potential systematic affecting the 400 MHz flux, the integrated spectral index, and the k(400) point, but it is an accuracy/robustness concern rather than a circular derivation. No fitted parameter is announced as an independent prediction, and no part of the argument is equivalent by construction to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 12 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is an observational study; it introduces no new theoretical entities. The central claim rests on standard astrophysical assumptions (synchrotron emission, equipartition, LCDM cosmology) and on literature identifications (cold fronts, mini-halo definition). The model fits (double-beta X-ray model, exponential radio profiles) are outputs used for interpretation rather than ad hoc knobs, but the number of Gaussian components in the LinMix regression is a fixed modeling choice that affects the derived correlation slopes. The most fragile modeling assumption is that the different uv-coverage of the radio datasets does not bias the multi-frequency flux comparisons; the paper shows a 40% flux change when uv-cuts are matched, which is not propagated into the spectral index uncertainty.

free parameters (12)
  • X-ray double-beta model: beta = 1.08 +/- 0.08
    Fitted to XMM-Newton surface brightness to construct the residual map (Figure 4) used to identify sloshing features.
  • X-ray double-beta model: inner core radius r_c1 = 2.13 +/- 0.13 arcmin
    Component of the same fit; inner core radius is just larger than the northern cold front radius.
  • X-ray double-beta model: outer core radius r_c2 = 9.1 +/- 0.5 arcmin
    Component of the same fit.
  • X-ray double-beta model: normalization ratio = 0.40 +/- 0.01
    Component of the same fit.
  • X-ray double-beta model: log normalization = -1.33 +/- 0.01
    Component of the same fit.
  • X-ray double-beta model: log background = -3.06 +/- 0.05
    Component of the same fit.
  • UHF-band north radial profile: I0, r_e (component 1) = 0.44 +/- 0.04 microJy/arcsec2, 158 +/- 10 arcsec
    Exponential fit to the radio surface brightness profile; descriptive, not load-bearing.
  • UHF-band north radial profile: I0, r_e (component 2) = 0.55 +/- 0.14 microJy/arcsec2, 21 +/- 7 arcsec
    Second component required in the north at UHF.
  • UHF-band south radial profile: I0, r_e = 0.64 +/- 0.02 microJy/arcsec2, 129 +/- 4 arcsec
    Exponential fit.
  • L-band north radial profile: I0, r_e = 0.34 +/- 0.01 microJy/arcsec2, 121 +/- 4 arcsec
    Exponential fit.
  • L-band south radial profile: I0, r_e = 0.37 +/- 0.01 microJy/arcsec2, 127 +/- 4 arcsec
    Exponential fit.
  • Point-to-point I_R-I_X correlation slopes k per frequency = 0.58 +/- 0.05 (400), 0.64 +/- 0.04 (816), 0.46 +/- 0.04 (887), 0.75 +/- 0.04 (1283)
    Measured slopes reported in Table 6; these are the headline correlation results, but their values depend on the fixed number of Gaussian components (3) in LinMix and on masking choices. They are outputs, not ad hoc inputs, but the fitting prior is a modeling choice.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The radio emission is synchrotron radiation from relativistic electrons.
    Standard assumption for diffuse cluster radio emission, used throughout Sections 5-7.
  • domain assumption Equipartition between magnetic field and relativistic particles with filling factor and proton-to-electron ratio of unity.
    Used to estimate magnetic field and electron age in Section 7.3.
  • domain assumption The mini-halo definition from Giacintucci et al. (2017) that mini-halos have a maximum radius of 0.2 R500.
    Used to classify A3558 as a mini-halo in Section 7.1.
  • domain assumption The cold front positions from Rossetti et al. (2007) and Mirakhor et al. (2023) are correct.
    The analysis of sloshing and regions inside/outside the cold front depends on these literature positions.
  • ad hoc to paper The different uv-coverage of the uGMRT and MeerKAT data does not introduce significant bias in the measured flux densities and spectral index.
    The paper acknowledges a 40% flux difference under matched uv-cuts (Section 3.3) but does not propagate this into the spectral index, implicitly assuming the bias is small.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Peculiar Mini-Halo in the Shapley Supercluster Member Abell 3558." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5UXHTAGZ

@misc{pith2026250707549,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Peculiar Mini-Halo in the Shapley Supercluster Member Abell 3558},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5UXHTAGZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.07549}
}
abstract

We present a multi-band study of the diffuse emission in the galaxy cluster Abell 3558, located in the core of the Shapley Supercluster. Using new MeerKAT UHF-Band and uGMRT Band-3 observations, and published MeerKAT L-band and ASKAP 887 MHz data, we perform a detailed analysis of the diffuse emission in the cluster centre. We complement with XMM-Newton X-ray information for a thorough study of the connection between the thermal and non-thermal properties of the cluster. We find that the diffuse radio emission in the cluster centre is more extended than published earlier, with a previously undetected extension spanning 100 kpc towards the north beyond the innermost cold front, increasing the total size of the emission to 550 kpc, and shows a clear spatial correlation with the X-ray features. The overall radio spectrum is steep ($\alpha_{\rm 400\,MHz}^{\rm 1569\,MHz}=1.18\pm0.10$), with local fluctuations which show several connections with the X-ray surface brightness, cold fronts, and residual emission. The point-to-point correlation between the radio and X-ray surface brightness is sub-linear, and steepens with increasing frequency. We discuss the classification of the diffuse emission considering its overall properties, those of the ICM, and the existing scaling laws between the radio and X-ray quantities in galaxy clusters. We conclude that it is a mini-halo, powered by turbulent (re)-acceleration induced by sloshing motions within the cluster region delimited by the cold fronts, and it supports the picture of a known minor merger between A\,3558 and the group SC\,1327--312 with mass ratio 5:1.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.07549 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Composite image of the A 3558 environment. The background is an RGB colour image of the DESI Legacy Survey DR10 in the g,r,z-bands. Overlaid in blue is the X-ray XMM-Newton 0.7-1.2 keV image and in red the Native MeerKAT UHF-band radio image at an angular resolution of ∼13′′ . The BCG is labelled with its redshift. The SZ cluster peak is indicated by a black cross. interactions, possibly with the group SC 1327–312, … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. A 3558 optical/radio overlay. The colormap is the same DESI image from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Point source subtracted MFS continuum images of the A 3558 diffuse emission. Left: uGMRT 400 MHz. Middle: UHF-band 816 MHz. Right: L-band 1283 MHz. All images are restored to a 30′′ beam size, with local noises of 95𝜇Jy/beam, 32𝜇Jy/beam, and 17𝜇Jy/beam, respectively. The BCG is located by a blue cross. The green contours start at 3𝜎 and increase by a factor of two. Dashed white contours show the -3𝜎 level. The north… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (11 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: X-ray maps with UHF-band contours overlaid (same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: A 3558 UHF- and L-band surface brightness profiles. Left: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: A3558 integrated spectrum. Red squares and blue crosses show the MeerKAT UHF- and L-band data points, respectively. The black circles show uGMRT at 400 MHz and ASKAP at 887 MHz. subband images of these datasets for an integrated spectrum, spectral index and curvature m…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: A3558 spectral index map and radial profile. Left: spectral index map at 30′′ resolution with UHF-band contours overlaid. Middle: same as left but at 60′′ . Right: radial profile similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: A 3558 spectral curvature map and radial profile at 60′′ . Left: curvature map. Middle: uncertainty map. Right: radial profile. 5.2.2 Spectral index map The resolved spectral index map between the six MeerKAT subbands at 30′′ and 60′′ resolution are shown in [PITH_FUL…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: A 3558 spectral index profiles against X-ray GGM and residual surface brightness maps. Left: spectral index map from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: A 3558 𝐼𝑅/𝐼𝑋 slope versus frequency. The correlation slopes from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_11.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: A 3558 𝐼𝑅/𝐼𝑋 correlation analysis. Top: X-ray surface brightness map shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: A 3558 𝑘-correlation as a function of radius for the MeerKAT UHF-band and L-band data. The green horizontal line shows the best-fit 𝑘- values found in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_12.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: A 3558 X-ray residual map from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Mini-halo radio power correlation planes against X-ray luminosity (left) and BCG radio power (right). Blue points are from the sample presented in Giacintucci et al. (2019), green points from Trehaeven et al. (2023). The A 2142 mini-halo is marked in magenta and A 355…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

97 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Balboni M., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347965 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...686A...5B 686, A5

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347965 2024

  2. [2]

    Bardelli S., De Grandi S., Ettori S., Molendi S., Zucca E., Colafrancesco S., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20011665 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002A&A...382...17B 382, 17

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20011665 2002

  3. [3]

    Biava N., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab2840 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.508.3995B 508, 3995

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2840 2021

  4. [4]

    Biava N., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202348045 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...686A..82B 686, A82

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348045 2024

  5. [5]

    Bonafede A., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slu110 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.444L..44B 444, L44

    doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slu110 2014

  6. [6]

    Bonafede A., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abcb8f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...907...32B 907, 32

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abcb8f 2021

  7. [7]

    Botteon A., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slaa142 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.499L..11B 499, L11

    doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slaa142 2020

  8. [8]

    W., 2014, @doi [International Journal of Modern Physics D] 10.1142/S0218271814300079 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014IJMPD..2330007B 23, 1430007

    Brunetti G., Jones T. W., 2014, @doi [International Journal of Modern Physics D] 10.1142/S0218271814300079 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014IJMPD..2330007B 23, 1430007

    doi:10.1142/s0218271814300079 2014

Show all 97 references
  1. [9]

    Brunetti G., et al., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature07379 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008Natur.455..944B 455, 944

    2008 doi

  2. [10]

    Bruno L., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202039877 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...650A..44B 650, A44

    2021 doi

  3. [11]

    Bruno L., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347245 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...678A.133B 678, A133

    2023 doi

  4. [12]

    A., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/320500 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...553L..15B 553, L15

    Buote D. A., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/320500 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...553L..15B 553, L15

    2001 doi

  5. [13]

    CASA Team et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1538-3873/ac9642 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022PASP..134k4501C 134, 114501

    2022 doi

  6. [14]

    Cappellari M., Copin Y., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06541.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.342..345C 342, 345

    2003

  7. [15]

    Cassano R., Brunetti G., Setti G., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10423.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.369.1577C 369, 1577

    2006

  8. [16]

    Cassano R., Ettori S., Giacintucci S., Brunetti G., Markevitch M., Venturi T., Gitti M., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/721/2/L82 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...721L..82C 721, L82

    2010 doi

  9. [17]

    Cassano R., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/777/2/141 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...777..141C 777, 141

    2013 doi

  10. [18]

    Cassano R., Brunetti G., Giocoli C., Ettori S., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201628414 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...593A..81C 593, A81

    2016 doi

  11. [19]

    Chandra P., Ray A., Bhatnagar S., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/422675 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...612..974C 612, 974

    2004 doi

  12. [20]

    Cuciti V., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202039208 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...647A..51C 647, A51

    2021 doi

  13. [21]

    Cuciti V., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202346755 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...680A..30C 680, A30

    2023 doi

  14. [22]

    Dey A., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ab089d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019AJ....157..168D 157, 168

    2019 doi

  15. [23]

    Di Gennaro G., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201832801 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...620A..25D 620, A25

    2018 doi

  16. [24]

    arXiv:2408.14142

    Di Gennaro G., et al., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2408.14142 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240814142D p. arXiv:2408.14142

    2024 doi arXiv

  17. [25]

    Dolag K., Sorce J. G., Pilipenko S., Hern \'a ndez-Mart \' nez E., Valentini M., Gottl \"o ber S., Aghanim N., Khabibullin I., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202346213 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...677A.169D 677, A169

    2023 doi

  18. [26]

    Eckert D., Finoguenov A., Ghirardini V., Grandis S., Kaefer F., Sanders J., Ramos-Ceja M., 2020, @doi [The Open Journal of Astrophysics] 10.21105/astro.2009.13944 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020OJAp....3E..12E 3, 12

    2020 arXiv

  19. [27]

    u tsi G., Einasto M., Saar E., Tucker D. L., M \

    Einasto J., H \"u tsi G., Einasto M., Saar E., Tucker D. L., M \"u ller V., Hein \"a m \"a ki P., Allam S. S., 2003a, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20030419 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003A&A...405..425E 405, 425

    doi

  20. [28]

    Einasto J., et al., 2003b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20031105 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003A&A...410..425E 410, 425

    doi

  21. [29]

    C., White D

    Ettori S., Fabian A. C., White D. A., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/289.4.787 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997MNRAS.289..787E 289, 787

    1997 doi

  22. [30]

    J., Briel U

    Finoguenov A., Henriksen M. J., Briel U. G., de Plaa J., Kaastra J. S., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/422246 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...611..811F 611, 811

    2004 doi

  23. [31]

    Ghirardini V., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833325 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...621A..41G 621, A41

    2019 doi

  24. [32]

    Giacintucci S., Venturi T., Bardelli S., Dallacasa D., Zucca E., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20040071 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004A&A...419...71G 419, 71

    2004 doi

  25. [33]

    Giacintucci S., et al., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20053016 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005A&A...440..867G 440, 867

    2005 doi

  26. [34]

    E., Brunetti G., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7069 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...841...71G 841, 71

    Giacintucci S., Markevitch M., Cassano R., Venturi T., Clarke T. E., Brunetti G., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7069 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...841...71G 841, 71

    2017 doi

  27. [35]

    E., Kale R., Cuciti V., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab29f1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...880...70G 880, 70

    Giacintucci S., Markevitch M., Cassano R., Venturi T., Clarke T. E., Kale R., Cuciti V., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab29f1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...880...70G 880, 70

    2019 doi

  28. [36]

    Giacintucci S., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7805 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...934...49G 934, 49

    2022 doi

  29. [37]

    E., Kale R., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad12bc , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...961..133G 961, 133

    Giacintucci S., Venturi T., Markevitch M., Brunetti G., Clarke T. E., Kale R., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad12bc , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...961..133G 961, 133

    2024 doi

  30. [38]

    Govoni F., Feretti L., 2004, @doi [International Journal of Modern Physics D] 10.1142/S0218271804005080 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004IJMPD..13.1549G 13, 1549

    2004 doi

  31. [39]

    A., Feretti L., Giovannini G., 2001a, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20010115 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001A&A...369..441G 369, 441

    Govoni F., En lin T. A., Feretti L., Giovannini G., 2001a, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20010115 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001A&A...369..441G 369, 441

    doi

  32. [40]

    H., Murgia M., 2001b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20011016 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001A&A...376..803G 376, 803

    Govoni F., Feretti L., Giovannini G., B \"o hringer H., Reiprich T. H., Murgia M., 2001b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20011016 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001A&A...376..803G 376, 803

    doi

  33. [41]

    Govoni F., et al., 2019, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.aat7500 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019Sci...364..981G 364, 981

    2019 doi

  34. [42]

    Gupta Y., et al., 2017, @doi [Current Science] 10.18520/cs/v113/i04/707-714 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017CSci..113..707G 113, 707

    2017 doi

  35. [43]

    P., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2338 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.481.1055H 481, 1055

    Haines C. P., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2338 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.481.1055H 481, 1055

    2018 doi

  36. [44]

    P., Busarello G., Grado A., Mercurio A., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa1766 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.497...52H 497, 52

    Higuchi Y., Okabe N., Merluzzi P., Haines C. P., Busarello G., Grado A., Mercurio A., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa1766 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.497...52H 497, 52

    2020 doi

  37. [45]

    N., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202452052 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...695A.240H 695, A240

    Hoang D. N., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202452052 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...695A.240H 695, A240

    2025 doi

  38. [46]

    W., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1017/pasa.2021.1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021PASA...38....9H 38, e009

    Hotan A. W., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1017/pasa.2021.1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021PASA...38....9H 38, e009

    2021 doi

  39. [47]

    V., Perkins S., Merry B., Mauch T., Smirnov O

    Hugo B. V., Perkins S., Merry B., Mauch T., Smirnov O. M., 2022, in Ruiz J. E., Pierfedereci F., Teuben P., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 532, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXX. p. 541 ( @eprint arXiv 2206.09179 ), @doi 10.48...

    2022 doi arXiv

  40. [48]

    Ignesti A., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newast.2021.101732 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022NewA...9201732I 92, 101732

    2022

  41. [49]

    Ignesti A., Brunetti G., Gitti M., Giacintucci S., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201937207 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...640A..37I 640, A37

    2020 doi

  42. [50]

    T., 2014, in Astronomical Society of India Conference Series

    Intema H. T., 2014, in Astronomical Society of India Conference Series. p. 469 ( @eprint arXiv 1402.4889 ), @doi 10.48550/arXiv.1402.4889

    2014 doi arXiv

  43. [51]

    Jonas J., MeerKAT Team 2016, in MeerKAT Science: On the Pathway to the SKA. p. 1, @doi 10.22323/1.277.0001

    2016 doi

  44. [52]

    Jones A., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202245102 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...680A..31J 680, A31

    2023 doi

  45. [53]

    J \'o zsa G. I. G., et al., 2020, CARACal: Containerized Automated Radio Astronomy Calibration pipeline , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2006.014

    2020

  46. [54]

    Kale R., et al., 2015a, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201525695 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...579A..92K 579, A92

    doi

  47. [55]

    Kale R., Venturi T., Cassano R., Giacintucci S., Bardelli S., Dallacasa D., Zucca E., 2015b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201526341 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...581A..23K 581, A23

    doi

  48. [56]

    M., Parekh V., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slz061 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.486L..80K 486, L80

    Kale R., Shende K. M., Parekh V., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slz061 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.486L..80K 486, L80

    2019 doi

  49. [57]

    C., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/519947 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...665.1489K 665, 1489

    Kelly B. C., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/519947 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...665.1489K 665, 1489

    2007 doi

  50. [58]

    S., Perkins S

    Kenyon J. S., Perkins S. J., Bester H. L., Smirnov O. M., Russeeawon C., Hugo B. V., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2412.10072 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv241210072K p. arXiv:2412.10072

    2024 doi arXiv

  51. [59]

    Markevitch M., Vikhlinin A., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.physrep.2007.01.001 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007PhR...443....1M 443, 1

    2007 doi

  52. [60]

    Mazzotta P., Giacintucci S., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/529433 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...675L...9M 675, L9

    2008 doi

  53. [61]

    Merluzzi P., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu2085 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.446..803M 446, 803

    2015 doi

  54. [62]

    A., Haines C

    Merluzzi P., Busarello G., Dopita M. A., Haines C. P., Steinhauser D., Bourdin H., Mazzotta P., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1198 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.460.3345M 460, 3345

    2016 doi

  55. [63]

    Merluzzi P., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1867 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.533.1394M 533, 1394

    2024 doi

  56. [64]

    A., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/497165 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005AJ....130.2541M 130, 2541

    Miller N. A., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/497165 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005AJ....130.2541M 130, 2541

    2005 doi

  57. [65]

    S., Walker S

    Mirakhor M. S., Walker S. A., Sundquist M., Chandra D., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slad129 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.526L.124M 526, L124

    2023 doi

  58. [66]

    Mohan N., Rafferty D., 2015, PyBDSF: Python Blob Detection and Source Finder , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1502.007

    2015

  59. [67]

    B., Carretti E., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200911659 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...499..679M 499, 679

    Murgia M., Govoni F., Markevitch M., Feretti L., Giovannini G., Taylor G. B., Carretti E., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200911659 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...499..679M 499, 679

    2009 doi

  60. [68]

    V., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202450051 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...685L..10P 685, L10

    Pignataro G. V., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202450051 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...685L..10P 685, L10

    2024 doi

  61. [69]

    Planck Collaboration et al., 2014a, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321591 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...571A..16P 571, A16

    doi

  62. [70]

    Planck Collaboration et al., 2014b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321523 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...571A..29P 571, A29

    doi

  63. [71]

    Proust D., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20052838 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006A&A...447..133P 447, 133

    2006 doi

  64. [72]

    R., Reisenegger A., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202037726 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...638A..27Q 638, A27

    Quintana H., Proust D., D \"u nner R., Carrasco E. R., Reisenegger A., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202037726 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...638A..27Q 638, A27

    2020 doi

  65. [73]

    Raja R., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slaa002 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.493L..28R 493, L28

    2020 doi

  66. [74]

    M., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7585 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...975..125R 975, 125

    Raja R., Rahaman M., Datta A., Smirnov O. M., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7585 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...975..125R 975, 125

    2024 doi

  67. [75]

    Rajpurohit K., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202141060 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...654A..41R 654, A41

    2021 doi

  68. [76]

    Richard-Laferri \`e re A., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa2877 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.499.2934R 499, 2934

    2020 doi

  69. [77]

    J., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac672 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.512.4210R 512, 4210

    Riseley C. J., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac672 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.512.4210R 512, 4210

    2022 doi

  70. [78]

    J., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad2218 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.524.6052R 524, 6052

    Riseley C. J., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad2218 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.524.6052R 524, 6052

    2023 doi

  71. [79]

    J., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202348944 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...686A..44R 686, A44

    Riseley C. J., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202348944 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...686A..44R 686, A44

    2024 doi

  72. [80]

    Roediger E., Vaezzadeh I., Nulsen P., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae493 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.529..563R 529, 563

    2024 doi

  73. [81]

    Rossetti M., Ghizzardi S., Molendi S., Finoguenov A., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20054621 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...463..839R 463, 839

    2007 doi

  74. [82]

    S., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202141501 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...661A..36S 661, A36

    Sanders J. S., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202141501 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...661A..36S 661, A36

    2022 doi

  75. [83]

    Savini F., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1125 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.478.2234S 478, 2234

    2018 doi

  76. [84]

    Savini F., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833882 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...622A..24S 622, A24

    2019 doi

  77. [85]

    M., Makhathini S., Kenyon J

    Smirnov O. M., Makhathini S., Kenyon J. S., Bester H. L., Perkins S. J., Ramaila A. J. T., Hugo B. V., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2412.10080 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv241210080S p. arXiv:2412.10080

    2024 doi arXiv

  78. [86]

    L., Mushotzky R

    Snowden S. L., Mushotzky R. F., Kuntz K. D., Davis D. S., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20077930 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008A&A...478..615S 478, 615

    2008 doi

  79. [87]

    S., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad391 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.520.4410T 520, 4410

    Trehaeven K. S., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad391 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.520.4410T 520, 4410

    2023 doi

  80. [88]

    W., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03403.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000MNRAS.314..594V 314, 594

    Venturi T., Bardelli S., Morganti R., Hunstead R. W., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03403.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000MNRAS.314..594V 314, 594

    2000

  81. [89]

    Venturi T., Giacintucci S., Dallacasa D., Cassano R., Brunetti G., Bardelli S., Setti G., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:200809622 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008A&A...484..327V 484, 327

    2008 doi

  82. [90]

    Venturi T., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201630014 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...603A.125V 603, A125

    2017 doi

  83. [91]

    Venturi T., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202142048 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...660A..81V 660, A81

    2022 doi

  84. [92]

    A., Markevitch M., Brunetti G., Giacintucci S., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/762/2/78 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...762...78Z 762, 78

    ZuHone J. A., Markevitch M., Brunetti G., Giacintucci S., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/762/2/78 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...762...78Z 762, 78

    2013 doi

  85. [93]

    A., Brunetti G., Giacintucci S., Markevitch M., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/801/2/146 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...801..146Z 801, 146

    ZuHone J. A., Brunetti G., Giacintucci S., Markevitch M., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/801/2/146 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...801..146Z 801, 146

    2015 doi

  86. [94]

    de Filippis E., Schindler S., Erben T., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20053675 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005A&A...444..387D 444, 387

    2005 doi

  87. [95]

    P., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220873 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...556A...2V 556, A2

    van Haarlem M. P., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220873 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...556A...2V 556, A2

    2013 doi

  88. [96]

    van Weeren R. J., de Gasperin F., Akamatsu H., Br \"u ggen M., Feretti L., Kang H., Stroe A., Zandanel F., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s11214-019-0584-z , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019SSRv..215...16V 215, 16

    2019 doi

  89. [97]

    J., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202451618 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...692A..12V 692, A12

    van Weeren R. J., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202451618 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...692A..12V 692, A12

    2024 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.