Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 7 minor 104 references

Detecting Galactic Rings in the DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys with Semi-Supervised Deep Learning

T0 review · 2 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Using a semi-supervised GAN trained on 5,173 expert-confirmed rings, this paper reports 62,962 ringed-galaxy candidates in the DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys, the largest catalog to date.

desk verdict A large new ringed-galaxy catalog whose headline precision hasn't been shown to transfer to the prediction sample; the paper's own caveat admits the gap. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.07552 v1 pith:JQAR7CAW submitted 2025-07-10 astro-ph.GA

Jianzhen Chen , Zhijian Luo , Cheng Cheng , Jun Hou , Shaohua Zhang , Chenggang Shu This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords galacticringssemi-supervisedlearninggenerativeadversarialnetworksgalaxymorphologyDESILegacyImagingSurveysringedcatalogconvolutionalneuralgreenvalleygalaxies
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that scarce expert labels, combined with abundant unlabeled galaxy images, are enough to train a deep model that finds galactic rings across the DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys. The authors build a training set from 5,173 expert-verified ringed galaxies and 15,000 strictly selected non-ringed galaxies, then train the semi-supervised GC-SWGAN model with 15,000 unlabeled images. On a held-out test set the model reaches about 97% accuracy, with 94% precision and 93% recall for rings. Applied to 748,601 galaxies with r < 17.0 and 0.0005 < z < 0.25, it produces 62,962 ringed-galaxy candidates, which the paper presents as the largest such catalog to date. If the test-set metrics carry over, this catalog would substantially expand the known sample of ringed galaxies and provide a new statistical basis for studying ring formation and evolution.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is GC-SWGAN, a semi-supervised generative adversarial network in which the classifier and the discriminator share a feature-extraction backbone. This sharing lets unlabeled real images and generator-produced fake images train the feature space that the classifier uses, so the model learns ring morphology from only 5,173 labeled positive examples. The generator, discriminator, and classifier losses are combined, with a Wasserstein distance and gradient penalty stabilizing training. This architecture is what converts scarce expert labels into a survey-scale classifier that can score 750,000 images in under fifteen minutes.

What would settle it

Take a random sample of a few hundred galaxies from the 62,962 candidates, have an independent morphologist classify them without knowing the model's output probabilities, and compare the confirmed-ring fraction with the claimed 94% precision; if the confirmed fraction falls well below that, the transferability assumption fails. The same test could be applied to the 0.9-threshold subsample to check whether higher thresholds truly deliver higher purity.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that a semi-supervised GAN-based classifier, GC-SWGAN, can identify galactic rings in DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys images well enough to build the largest ringed-galaxy catalog to date. The model combines a semi-supervised GAN with a Wasserstein GAN with gradient penalty; its discriminator and classifier share a feature-extraction backbone, so unlabeled images improve the classifier without needing labels. Trained on 5,173 ringed galaxies from the CSRG and GZ2-CNRG catalogs, 15,000 non-ringed galaxies, and 15,000 unlabeled images, the model reaches an MCC of 0.91, an AU-ROC of 0.9921, and an AU-PRC of 0.9794 for rings on the test set. Applying it to 748,601 galaxies yields 62,962 ring candidates at a 0.5 threshold and 37,508 at a 0.9 threshold. The paper argues this is the largest sample of ringed galaxies to date.

Load-bearing premise

The 94% precision measured on a held-out test set, which is a random split from the same expert catalogs used for training, is assumed to carry over to the full 748,601-galaxy prediction sample, where true rings are rarer, galaxies are fainter and more distant, and many morphologies are ambiguous.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the test-set precision of roughly 94% holds on the full prediction sample, about 59,000 of the 62,962 candidates would be true ringed galaxies, giving a catalog an order of magnitude larger than previous expert-verified collections.
  • The implied ring fraction among bright nearby galaxies is about 8.4%, lower than earlier estimates from the Galaxy Zoo DECaLS and HSC samples; the authors attribute this difference to their stricter expert-based training labels.
  • Raising the classification threshold to 0.9 trades away nearly half the candidates for a higher-purity subsample of 37,508 galaxies, which can serve as a conservative core catalog.
  • Compared with a control sample matched in redshift and r-band absolute magnitude, the predicted ringed galaxies concentrate in the green valley of g-r color and specific star formation rate, consistent with rings marking a transitional star-formation phase.
  • The model's probability output decreases and becomes more uncertain toward fainter magnitudes and higher redshifts, so the catalog is most complete for low-redshift, high-luminosity rings.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the paper reports no independent visual or external-catalog validation of the 62,962 predictions, the true precision on the full prediction sample is unmeasured; a small validation campaign on a few hundred candidates would test the 94% claim directly.
  • The observed probability trends with magnitude and redshift imply that downstream evolution studies should model catalog incompleteness as a function of brightness and distance rather than treat the selection as flat.
  • The same shared-feature semi-supervised recipe could be applied to other rare morphological features, such as tidal tails, shells, or galactic lenses, where expert catalogs are similarly small.
  • A head-to-head comparison with transfer-learning classifiers trained on the same labels would clarify whether the semi-supervised advantage comes from the unlabeled images or from the shared feature architecture.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper trains a GC-SWGAN semi-supervised classifier to detect ringed galaxies in DESI Legacy Imaging Survey images. The labeled training set comprises 5,173 ringed galaxies from the CSRG and GZ2-CNRG catalogs and 15,000 strictly selected non-ringed galaxies from GZ2, with 15,000 unlabeled DESI images; images are preprocessed and split 80:20 into training and test sets. On the test set, the model achieves 97% accuracy, 94% precision and 93% recall for rings at a 0.5 probability threshold. The trained model is applied to 748,601 galaxies with r<17.0 and 0.0005<z<0.25, yielding 62,962 ring candidates (8.4% of the input), which the authors describe as the largest ringed-galaxy catalog to date. A comparison of g-r color and specific star formation rate between the predicted ringed sample and a control sample indicates that ringed galaxies preferentially populate the green valley.

Significance. If the reported test-set precision transfers to the full prediction sample, the resulting catalog of 62,962 ringed galaxies would be a valuable resource for studying ring formation and evolution, and the semi-supervised approach would be a useful tool for rare-morphology searches in large imaging surveys. The paper has notable strengths: the training labels are expert-verified (CSRG and GZ2-CNRG), the non-ring selection is strict (zero ring votes), the model code is publicly available on GitHub, and the application to 748,601 galaxies demonstrates a scalable pipeline. The green-valley analysis with a redshift- and luminosity-matched control sample is a sensible first application. However, the central catalog claim currently rests on test-set metrics measured on a random split of the same expert catalogs used for training, with no independent validation of the predicted sample; this is the main gap that must be addressed.

major comments (2)
  1. [§6, Table 1] The 94% precision and 93% recall for ringed galaxies are computed on a random 20% split (Section 3) of the same expert catalogs used for training, where the ringed fraction is 1,028/4,024 ≈ 25.5%. The prediction sample has a ringed fraction of only 62,962/748,601 ≈ 8.4%. Precision is prevalence-dependent: even if the test-set TPR (0.928) and FPR (derived from the non-ring recall of 0.9786, i.e., FPR ≈ 0.0214) were exactly preserved, the expected precision at 8.4% prevalence would be only about 80%, not 94%. More importantly, the prediction sample contains fainter and higher-redshift galaxies and many ambiguous morphologies, as the paper itself acknowledges in Section 6 and Section 8. The paper provides no independent visual or external-catalog validation of the 62,962 candidates, and its own caveat for the threshold-0.9 catalog — 'this accuracy is based on the training set and may not reflect the true performance of the model without further validation using independent datasets and true class labels' — applies equally to the threshold-0.5 catalog that defines the headline sample. This transferability gap is load-bearing for the central claim of a 94%-precision catalog of 62,962 galaxies.
  2. [§7, Figure 9] The green-valley and SSFR analysis uses the same unvalidated candidate list as the catalog. Because the control sample is drawn from the same prediction pool, any classifier bias — for example, false positives or false negatives correlated with image size, brightness, or concentration — will directly imprint on the color and SSFR distributions being compared. The paper states that ringed galaxies 'are more likely to reside in the green valley' based on this comparison, but without quantifying the contamination or repeating the analysis on a verified subsample (e.g., a visually inspected random subset or the high-confidence prob>0.9 catalog), this physical conclusion is not yet established. The authors should show that the green-valley excess persists under stricter thresholds or after independent visual verification.
minor comments (7)
  1. [§3] The claim that cropping from 256×256 to 192×192 reduces computational resource consumption by 'approximately 32%' is inconsistent with the pixel counts: (256^2 - 192^2)/256^2 ≈ 43.8%. Please correct the percentage.
  2. [§5, Eq. (3)] In the text following Eq. (3), 'samples predicted as positive (non-ringed galaxies)' should read 'samples predicted as positive (ringed galaxies)'; the parenthetical currently misstates the positive class.
  3. [§6] When introducing the threshold-0.9 catalog, the text states 'During the evaluation on the training set, this threshold corresponds to an accuracy of approximately 98%'; the evaluation is on the test set, not the training set. The same wording appears earlier in the paragraph on the threshold-0.5 catalog ('Based on the evaluation results from the training set'). Please correct both.
  4. [§4.1] The claim that GC-SWGAN 'significantly reduced reliance on extensive annotated data' is supported only by a citation to Luo et al. (2025a); this paper does not include an ablation comparing GC-SWGAN to a fully supervised baseline trained on the same labeled data for this specific ring-detection task. A brief comparison or a clear statement that the advantage is inherited from the method paper would strengthen the presentation.
  5. [§7] The concentration index C is used to describe the control-sample construction of Fernandez et al. but is never defined. Please provide a definition or reference.
  6. [Table 2] The full catalog is essential for the paper's central contribution, but the manuscript provides only a 30-row preview. The full machine-readable catalog should be made available (e.g., as a data release or supplementary file) rather than promised as 'available online' without a persistent link.
  7. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors, including 'adpoted' and 'dection' in Section 1. A careful proofreading pass is recommended.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the catalog is an application of an independently trained and evaluated model, with test metrics measured rather than fitted.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is an empirical catalog produced by applying a trained model to new images, not a derivation that reduces to its own inputs by construction. The training labels come from external expert catalogs (CSRG and GZ2-CNRG), the non-ring labels come from Galaxy Zoo 2 strict vote thresholds, and the model is evaluated on a held-out random split of the labeled data in Section 5, where precision, recall, F1, AU-ROC, and AU-PRC are directly measured rather than imposed. The self-citations to Luo et al. (2025a) for the GC-SWGAN architecture and to Luo et al. (2025b) for image-size choices are present, but they are not load-bearing circularity: this paper retrains and independently evaluates the model on the ring-detection task, so the catalog result rests on the in-paper test metrics and the model's actual outputs on the 748,601-galaxy prediction sample. The extrapolation of test-set precision to the lower-prevalence prediction set is a genuine external-validity concern, and the paper itself flags this limitation when discussing the threshold-0.9 catalog ('this accuracy is based on the training set and may not reflect the true performance of the model without further validation using independent datasets and true class labels'), but that is a generalization or correctness issue, not a definitional or self-referential circularity. No equation, fitted parameter, or cited uniqueness theorem forces the 62,962-galaxy result, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim (catalog of 62,962 rings) is an observational product. The main free parameters are the classification threshold and the sample cuts; the main axioms are the trust in the expert catalogs and the transferability of test-set metrics to the large prediction sample.

free parameters (5)
  • Classification probability threshold = 0.5 (0.9 for high-confidence subset)
    The catalog size (62,962) directly depends on this chosen threshold; no uncertainty is attached to it.
  • Selection cuts r<17.0 and 0.0005<z<0.25 = r<17.0, 0.0005<z<0.25
    These cuts define the prediction sample and are chosen to match training data; the catalog only covers this volume.
  • Non-ringed selection criterion = zero votes for ring feature in GZ2
    Stricter than the f<0.05 threshold used in prior work; affects the negative training distribution.
  • Image crop size = 192x192 pixels
    Chosen for computational efficiency; may lose extended ring features.
  • Training hyperparameters = learning rate 0.0001, decay factor 1/1.000004, batch size 64, 100,000 iterations
    Standard choices; not tuned per data in a way that changes the central claim.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The CSRG and GZ2-CNRG catalogs are accurate ground truth for ringed galaxies.
    The entire supervised label set relies on Buta's expert classifications; any systematic misclassification (e.g., rings confused with spiral arms) propagates into the model.
  • ad hoc to paper The 8:2 random split of the labeled catalogs yields a test set representative of the full DESI prediction sample.
    Test and training come from the same catalogs and magnitude/redshift ranges; the prediction sample is much larger and has a different ring fraction.
  • ad hoc to paper The semi-supervised GC-SWGAN framework improves classification over fully supervised training with the same labeled data.
    No ablation is run in this paper; the claim rests on the authors' prior work (Luo et al. 2025a).
  • domain assumption Galaxy Zoo DESI photometric redshifts and magnitudes are sufficiently accurate for the r<17 and 0.0005<z<0.25 selection.
    These values define the input sample; errors can scatter galaxies in or out of the selection.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Detecting Galactic Rings in the DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys with Semi-Supervised Deep Learning." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JQAR7CAW

@misc{pith2026250707552,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Detecting Galactic Rings in the DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys with Semi-Supervised Deep Learning},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JQAR7CAW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.07552}
}
read the original abstract

The ring structures of disk galaxies are vital for understanding galaxy evolution and dynamics. However, due to the scarcity of ringed galaxies and challenges in their identification, traditional methods often struggle to efficiently obtain statistically significant samples. To address this, this study employs a novel semi-supervised deep learning model, GC-SWGAN, aimed at identifying galaxy rings from high-resolution images of the DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys. We selected over 5,000 confirmed ringed galaxies from the Catalog of Southern Ringed Galaxies (CSRG) and the Northern Ringed Galaxies from the GZ2 catalog (GZ2-CNRG), both verified by morphology expert R. J. Buta, to create an annotated training set. Additionally, we incorporated strictly selected non-ringed galaxy samples from the Galaxy Zoo 2 dataset and utilized unlabelled data from DESI Legacy Surveys to train our model. Through semi-supervised learning, the model significantly reduced reliance on extensive annotated data while enhancing robustness and generalization. On the test set, it demonstrated exceptional performance in identifying ringed galaxies. With a probability threshold of 0.5, the classification accuracy reached 97\%, with precision and recall for ringed galaxies at 94\% and 93\%, respectively. Building on these results, we predicted 750,000 galaxy images from the DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys with r-band apparent magnitudes less than 17.0 and redshifts in the range 0.0005 < z < 0.25, compiling the largest catalog of ringed galaxies to date, containing 62,962 galaxies with ring structures. This catalog provides essential data for subsequent research on the formation mechanisms and evolutionary history of galaxy rings.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.07552 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Random samples of galaxies with rings from our training set. by artifacts, blurring, or overexposed areas), we ultimately obtained a final training sample consisting of 5,173 ringed galaxy examples for our study. Among them, 1390 ringed galaxies are from CSRG, and 3783 ringed galaxies are from GZ2-CNRG. DESI-LS primarily provide imaging for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI; A. Dey et al. 2019), located… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Random samples of galaxies without rings from our training set. training data, which would improve the model’s generalization ability, enabling it to better recognize various types of galaxy features. Secondly, by including galaxy images of differing quality, we aimed to train a more robust model that can handle galaxy images under a range of observational conditions in practical applications. Subsequently, we utili… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The network architecture of GC-SWGAN. The symbol z represents the input random noise vector used by the generator to produce synthetic images. Xunlabeled denotes the input unlabeled real images, Xlabeled indicates the input labeled real images, and Xfake represents the synthetic images generated by the generator G. The generator G employs a multi-layer convolutional network structure, responsible for generating synt… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Classification performance of the model for ringed galaxies. Left panel: The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) of the model on the training data and test data. The embedded subplot shows the x-axis on a logarithmic scale. The black dashed line represents th…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Images of 30 random galaxies from the catalog of 62,962 ringed galaxies detected by the model. The red numbers in each subplot indicate the probability of being predicted as a ringed galaxy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Frequency histograms of three samples (input total galaxies, ring galaxies identified by the model, and ring galaxies used for training) for galaxy redshift z (left panel) and DESI r-band apparent magnitude mr (right panel). The solid red line represents model-predicte…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Relationship between the probability of the model classifying a galaxy as a ringed galaxy and apparent magnitude mr (left panel) and redshift (right panel). Each point represents the median probability within the corresponding magnitude interval (left panel) or redshif…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Images of 10 random galaxies predicted by the model to have ring structures. All these galaxies have 0.20 < z < 0.25 and 16.5 < mr < 17. The red numbers in each subplot indicate the probability of being predicted as a ringed galaxy. such as spiral and irregular galaxie…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Distributions of redshift, Mr, Mg − Mr, and Log(SSFR) for ringed galaxies (solid red lines) and for the control samples (non-ringed galaxies; dash black lines). Panels (a) and (b) demonstrate that the control galaxy sample exhibits high similarity to the ringed galaxy …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

104 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    [gϞŮk F߼ysyꫯL^ O<Q ׍S p9--펜_DD &(( ' Xf/ X 2qD|||4iRe^z q ]ڵk2V^MV 5j ѭ6֭ QQQxyy p!>3 XdI]v _ iذ!cǎ_&33Pn ,]<w 7^9 > :(^0 i&nvťKnɥ

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt \@twocolumntrue 12pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key o...

    2017

  4. [4]

    2016, in 12th USENIX symposium on operating systems design and implementation (OSDI 16), 265--283

    Abadi, M., Barham, P., Chen, J., et al. 2016, in 12th USENIX symposium on operating systems design and implementation (OSDI 16), 265--283

    2016

  5. [5]

    Abbott , T. M. C., Adam \'o w , M., Aguena , M., et al. 2021, title The Dark Energy Survey Data Release 2 , , 255, 20, 10.3847/1538-4365/ac00b3

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac00b3 2021

  6. [6]

    K., et al

    Abraham, L., Abraham, S., Kembhavi, A. K., et al. 2025, title Automated detection of galactic rings from sloan digital sky survey images, The Astrophysical Journal, 978, 137

    2025

  7. [7]

    K., Philip, N., & Vaghmare, K

    Abraham, S., Aniyan, A., Kembhavi, A. K., Philip, N., & Vaghmare, K. 2018, title Detection of bars in galaxies using a deep convolutional neural network, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 477, 894

    2018

  8. [8]

    Banach Wasserstein GAN

    Adler, J., & Lunz, S. 2018, title Banach wasserstein gan, Advances in neural information processing systems, 31, 6755. 1806.06621

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

Show all 104 references
  1. [9]

    S., Morales-Luis, A., Mu \ n oz-Tu \ n \'o n, C., et al

    Almeida, J. S., Morales-Luis, A., Mu \ n oz-Tu \ n \'o n, C., et al. 2014, title Metallicity inhomogeneities in local star-forming galaxies as a sign of recent metal-poor gas accretion, The Astrophysical Journal, 783, 45

    2014

  2. [10]

    Alonso, S., Mesa, V., Padilla, N., & Lambas, D. G. 2012, title Galaxy interactions-II. High density environments, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 539, A46

    2012

  3. [11]

    1996, title Collisional ring galaxies, Fundamentals of Cosmic Physics, 16, 18

    Appleton, P., & Struck-Marcell, C. 1996, title Collisional ring galaxies, Fundamentals of Cosmic Physics, 16, 18

    1996

  4. [12]

    2017, in Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Vol

    Arjovsky, M., Chintala, S., & Bottou, L. 2017, in Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 70, Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, ed. D. Precup & Y. W. Teh (PMLR), 214--223. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v70/arjovsky17a.html

    2017

  5. [13]

    2009 a , title Rings and spirals in barred galaxies--II

    Athanassoula, E., Romero-G \'o mez, M., Bosma, A., & Masdemont, J. 2009 a , title Rings and spirals in barred galaxies--II. Ring and spiral morphology, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 400, 1706

    2009

  6. [14]

    2010, title Rings and spirals in barred galaxies--III

    Athanassoula, E., Romero-G \'o mez, M., Bosma, A., & Masdemont, J. 2010, title Rings and spirals in barred galaxies--III. Further comparisons and links to observations, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 407, 1433

    2010

  7. [15]

    2009 b , title Rings and spirals in barred galaxies--I

    Athanassoula, E., Romero-G \'o mez, M., & Masdemont, J. 2009 b , title Rings and spirals in barred galaxies--I. Building blocks, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 394, 67

    2009

  8. [16]

    J., et al

    Banerji, M., Lahav, O., Lintott, C. J., et al. 2010, title Galaxy Zoo: reproducing galaxy morphologies via machine learning, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 406, 342

    2010

  9. [17]

    1990, title Weakly barred early-type ringed galaxies

    Buta, R. 1990, title Weakly barred early-type ringed galaxies. III-The remarkable outer-ringed S0+ galaxy NGC 7020, Astrophysical Journal, Part 1 (ISSN 0004-637X), vol. 356, June 10, 1990, p. 87-99., 356, 87

    1990

  10. [18]

    1995, title The catalog of southern ringed galaxies, Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series (ISSN 0067-0049), vol

    Buta, R. 1995, title The catalog of southern ringed galaxies, Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series (ISSN 0067-0049), vol. 96, no. 1, p. 39-116, 96, 39

    1995

  11. [19]

    1996, title Galactic Rings, Fundamentals of Cosmic Physics, 17, 95

    Buta, R., & Combes, F. 1996, title Galactic Rings, Fundamentals of Cosmic Physics, 17, 95

    1996

  12. [20]

    Buta, R. J. 2013, title Galaxy Morphology, Planets, Stars and Stellar Systems. Volume 6: Extragalactic Astronomy and Cosmology, 6, 1

    2013

  13. [21]

    Buta, R. J. 2017, title Galactic rings revisited--I. CVRHS classifications of 3962 ringed galaxies from the Galaxy Zoo 2 Database, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 471, 4027

    2017

  14. [22]

    K., Bekki, K., & Groves, B

    Cavanagh, M. K., Bekki, K., & Groves, B. A. 2021, title Morphological classification of galaxies with deep learning: comparing 3-way and 4-way CNNs, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 506, 659

    2021

  15. [23]

    \'C iprijanovi \'c , A., Lewis, A., Pedro, K., et al. 2023, title DeepAstroUDA: semi-supervised universal domain adaptation for cross-survey galaxy morphology classification and anomaly detection, Machine Learning: Science and Technology, 4, 025013

    2023

  16. [24]

    Collaboration:, D. E. S., Abbott, T., Abdalla, F., et al. 2016, title The Dark Energy Survey: more than dark energy--an overview, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 460, 1270

    2016

  17. [25]

    2023, title Astroformer: More data might not be all you need for classification, arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.05350

    Dagli, R. 2023, title Astroformer: More data might not be all you need for classification, arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.05350

    2023 arXiv

  18. [26]

    B., et al

    Dark Energy Survey Collaboration , Abbott , T., Abdalla , F. B., et al. 2016, title The Dark Energy Survey: more than dark energy - an overview , , 460, 1270, 10.1093/mnras/stw641

    2016 doi

  19. [27]

    T., Verdoes Kleijn, G

    de Jong, J. T., Verdoes Kleijn, G. A., Kuijken, K. H., et al. 2013, title The kilo-degree survey, Experimental Astronomy, 35, 25

    2013

  20. [28]

    2024, title Detecting galaxy tidal features using self-supervised representation learning, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 531, 4070

    Desmons, A., Brough, S., & Lanusse, F. 2024, title Detecting galaxy tidal features using self-supervised representation learning, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 531, 4070

    2024

  21. [29]

    2016, in Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VI, Vol

    Dey, A., Rabinowitz, D., Karcher, A., et al. 2016, in Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VI, Vol. 9908, SPIE, 750--757

    2016

  22. [30]

    J., Lang, D., et al

    Dey, A., Schlegel, D. J., Lang, D., et al. 2019, title Overview of the DESI legacy imaging surveys, The Astronomical Journal, 157, 168

    2019

  23. [31]

    W., & Dambre, J

    Dieleman, S., Willett, K. W., & Dambre, J. 2015, title Rotation-invariant convolutional neural networks for galaxy morphology prediction, Monthly notices of the royal astronomical society, 450, 1441

    2015

  24. [32]

    2018, title Improving galaxy morphologies for SDSS with Deep Learning, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 476, 3661

    Dom \' nguez S \'a nchez, H., Huertas-Company, M., Bernardi, M., Tuccillo, D., & Fischer, J. 2018, title Improving galaxy morphologies for SDSS with Deep Learning, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 476, 3661

    2018

  25. [33]

    D., Wong, O

    Elagali, A., Lagos, C. D., Wong, O. I., et al. 2018, title Ring galaxies in the EAGLE hydrodynamical simulations, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 481, 2951

    2018

  26. [34]

    1992, title The influence of environment on outer rings and pseudo-rings in galaxies, Astronomy and Astrophysics (ISSN 0004-6361), vol

    Elmegreen, D., Elmegreen, B., Combes, F., & Bellin, A. 1992, title The influence of environment on outer rings and pseudo-rings in galaxies, Astronomy and Astrophysics (ISSN 0004-6361), vol. 257, no. 1, p. 17-23., 257, 17

    1992

  27. [35]

    2024, title Revealing ringed galaxies in group environments, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 683, A32

    Fernandez, J., Alonso, S., Mesa, V., & Duplancic, F. 2024, title Revealing ringed galaxies in group environments, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 683, A32

    2024

  28. [36]

    2021, title Properties of galaxies with ring structures, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 653, A71

    Fernandez, J., Alonso, S., Mesa, V., Duplancic, F., & Coldwell, G. 2021, title Properties of galaxies with ring structures, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 653, A71

    2021

  29. [37]

    2015, title The dark energy camera, The Astronomical Journal, 150, 150

    Flaugher, B., Diehl, H., Honscheid, K., et al. 2015, title The dark energy camera, The Astronomical Journal, 150, 150

    2015

  30. [38]

    1977, title A0035 ‘the cartwheel’a large southern ring galaxy, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 178, 473

    Fosbury, R., & Hawarden, T. 1977, title A0035 ‘the cartwheel’a large southern ring galaxy, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 178, 473

    1977

  31. [39]

    1996, title The sloan Digital Sky Survey photometric system, , 111, 1748

    Fukugita, M., Ichikawa, T., Gunn, J., et al. 1996, title The sloan Digital Sky Survey photometric system, , 111, 1748

    1996

  32. [40]

    2020, title Data augmentation in fault diagnosis based on the Wasserstein generative adversarial network with gradient penalty, Neurocomputing, 396, 487

    Gao, X., Deng, F., & Yue, X. 2020, title Data augmentation in fault diagnosis based on the Wasserstein generative adversarial network with gradient penalty, Neurocomputing, 396, 487

    2020

  33. [41]

    2020, title A catalog of broad morphology of pan-starrs galaxies based on deep learning, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 251, 28

    Goddard, H., & Shamir, L. 2020, title A catalog of broad morphology of pan-starrs galaxies based on deep learning, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 251, 28

    2020

  34. [42]

    J., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., et al

    Goodfellow, I. J., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., et al. 2014, title Generative adversarial nets, Advances in neural information processing systems, 27

    2014

  35. [43]

    D., Buta, R., Salo, H., & Laurikainen, E

    Grouchy, R. D., Buta, R., Salo, H., & Laurikainen, E. 2010, title Ring Star Formation Rates in Barred and Nonbarred Galaxies, The Astronomical Journal, 139, 2465

    2010

  36. [44]

    Gulrajani, I., Ahmed, F., Arjovsky, M., Dumoulin, V., & Courville, A. C. 2017, title Improved training of wasserstein gans, Advances in neural information processing systems, 30

    2017

  37. [45]

    2015, title Catalogue of the morphological features in the Spitzer Survey of Stellar Structure in Galaxies (S4G), Astronomy & Astrophysics, 582, A86

    Herrera-Endoqui, M., D \' az-Garc \' a, S., Laurikainen, E., & Salo, H. 2015, title Catalogue of the morphological features in the Spitzer Survey of Stellar Structure in Galaxies (S4G), Astronomy & Astrophysics, 582, A86

    2015

  38. [46]

    H., Martin, C

    Ho, S. H., Martin, C. L., & Turner, M. L. 2019, title How Gas Accretion Feeds Galactic Disks, The Astrophysical Journal, 875, 54

    2019

  39. [47]

    Hoag, A. A. 1950, title A peculiar object in Serpens., The Astronomical Journal, 55, 170

    1950

  40. [48]

    Huertas-Company, M., Sarmiento, R., & Knapen, J. H. 2023, title A brief review of contrastive learning applied to astrophysics, RAS Techniques and Instruments, 2, 441

    2023

  41. [49]

    M., Tyson , J

    Ivezi \'c , Z ., Kahn , S. M., Tyson , J. A., et al. 2019, title LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products , , 873, 111, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab042c

    2019 doi

  42. [50]

    M., White, S

    Kauffmann, G., Heckman, T. M., White, S. D., et al. 2003 a , title The dependence of star formation history and internal structure on stellar mass for 105 low-redshift galaxies, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 341, 54

    2003

  43. [51]

    M., White, S

    Kauffmann, G., Heckman, T. M., White, S. D., et al. 2003 b , title Stellar masses and star formation histories for 105 galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 341, 33

    2003

  44. [52]

    J., & Brunner, R

    Kim, E. J., & Brunner, R. J. 2016, title Star-galaxy classification using deep convolutional neural networks, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, stw2672

    2016

  45. [53]

    Kingma, D. P. 2014, title Adam: A method for stochastic optimization, arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980

    2014 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Kodi Ramanah, D., Charnock, T., Villaescusa-Navarro, F., & Wandelt, B. D. 2020, title Super-resolution emulator of cosmological simulations using deep physical models, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 495, 4227

    2020

  47. [55]

    1979, title A morphological survey of bar, lens, and ring components in galaxies Secular evolution in galaxy structure, Astrophysical Journal, Part 1, vol

    Kormendy, J. 1979, title A morphological survey of bar, lens, and ring components in galaxies Secular evolution in galaxy structure, Astrophysical Journal, Part 1, vol. 227, Feb. 1, 1979, p. 714-728., 227, 714

    1979

  48. [56]

    Krishnakumar, H., & Kalmbach, J. B. 2024, title Analysis of Ring Galaxies Detected Using Deep Learning with Real and Simulated Data, The Astronomical Journal, 168, 191

    2024

  49. [57]

    G., Alonso, S., Mesa, V., & O’Mill, A

    Lambas, D. G., Alonso, S., Mesa, V., & O’Mill, A. L. 2012, title Galaxy interactions-I. Major and minor mergers, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 539, A45

    2012

  50. [58]

    G., Tissera, P

    Lambas, D. G., Tissera, P. B., Alonso, M. S., & Coldwell, G. 2003, title Galaxy pairs in the 2dF survey—I. Effects of interactions on star formation in the field, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 346, 1189

    2003

  51. [59]

    2022, title Deep-SWIM: A few-shot learning approach to classify Solar WInd Magnetic field structures, arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.01184

    Lamdouar, H., Sundaresan, S., Jungbluth, A., et al. 2022, title Deep-SWIM: A few-shot learning approach to classify Solar WInd Magnetic field structures, arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.01184

    2022 arXiv

  52. [60]

    2011, title Euclid Definition Study Report , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1110.3193, 10.48550/arXiv.1110.3193

    Laureijs , R., Amiaux , J., Arduini , S., et al. 2011, title Euclid Definition Study Report , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1110.3193, 10.48550/arXiv.1110.3193

    2011 doi arXiv

  53. [61]

    2015, title Deep learning, nature, 521, 436

    LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. 2015, title Deep learning, nature, 521, 436

    2015

  54. [62]

    1995, title Convolutional networks for images, speech, and time series, The handbook of brain theory and neural networks, 3361, 1995

    LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., et al. 1995, title Convolutional networks for images, speech, and time series, The handbook of brain theory and neural networks, 3361, 1995

    1995

  55. [63]

    A., et al

    Li, Y., Ni, Y., Croft, R. A., et al. 2021, title AI-assisted superresolution cosmological simulations, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118, e2022038118

    2021

  56. [64]

    A., Allison , J., Anderson , S

    LSST Science Collaboration: Abell , P. A., Allison , J., Anderson , S. F., et al. 2009, title LSST Science Book, Version 2.0 , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:0912.0201, 10.48550/arXiv.0912.0201

    2009 doi arXiv

  57. [65]

    2025 a , title Galaxy Morphology Classification via Deep Semi-Supervised Learning with Limited Labeled Data, arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.00500, 10.48550/arXiv.2504.00500

    Luo, Z., Chen, J., Zhang, S., et al. 2025 a , title Galaxy Morphology Classification via Deep Semi-Supervised Learning with Limited Labeled Data, arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.00500, 10.48550/arXiv.2504.00500

    2025 doi arXiv

  58. [66]

    Luo, Z., Zhang, S., Chen, J., et al. 2025 b , title Cross-survey Image Transformation: Enhancing SDSS and DECaLS Images to Near-HSC Quality for Advanced Astronomical Analysis, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 277, 22

    2025

  59. [67]

    Luo, Z.-J., Shu, C.-G., & Jia-Sheng, H. 2007, title The differences of star formation history between merging galaxies and field galaxies in the early data release of the SDSS, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, 59, 541

    2007

  60. [68]

    1976, title On the interpretation of ring galaxies: the binary ring system II Hz 4., Astrophysical Journal, Vol

    Lynds, R., & Toomre, A. 1976, title On the interpretation of ring galaxies: the binary ring system II Hz 4., Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 209, p. 382-388, 209, 382

    1976

  61. [69]

    2020, title Detecting outliers in astronomical images with deep generative networks, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 496, 2346

    Margalef-Bentabol, B., Huertas-Company, M., Charnock, T., et al. 2020, title Detecting outliers in astronomical images with deep generative networks, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 496, 2346

    2020

  62. [70]

    Mesa, V., Duplancic, F., Alonso, S., Coldwell, G., & Lambas, D. G. 2014, title Interacting galaxies: corotating and counter-rotating systems with tidal tails, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 438, 1784

    2014

  63. [71]

    2023, title The HI in Ring Galaxies Survey (HI-RINGS)—Effects of the bar on the HI gas in ring galaxies, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 40, e018

    Murugeshan, C., D z ud z ar, R., Bagge, R., et al. 2023, title The HI in Ring Galaxies Survey (HI-RINGS)—Effects of the bar on the HI gas in ring galaxies, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 40, e018

    2023

  64. [72]

    2016, title Semi-supervised learning with generative adversarial networks, arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.01583

    Odena, A. 2016, title Semi-supervised learning with generative adversarial networks, arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.01583

    2016 arXiv

  65. [73]

    2009, title Building a control sample for galaxy pairs, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 397, 748

    Perez, J., Tissera, P., & Blaizot, J. 2009, title Building a control sample for galaxy pairs, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 397, 748

    2009

  66. [74]

    2015, title Unsupervised representation learning with deep convolutional generative adversarial networks, arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.06434

    Radford, A., Metz, L., & Chintala, S. 2015, title Unsupervised representation learning with deep convolutional generative adversarial networks, arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.06434

    2015 arXiv

  67. [75]

    C., Kacprzak, T., Lucchi, A., et al

    Rodriguez, A. C., Kacprzak, T., Lucchi, A., et al. 2018, title Fast cosmic web simulations with generative adversarial networks, Computational Astrophysics and Cosmology, 5, 1

    2018

  68. [76]

    2008, title Stellar disks of collisional ring galaxies

    Romano, R., Mayya, Y., & Vorobyov, E. 2008, title Stellar disks of collisional ring galaxies. I. New multiband images, radial intensity and color profiles, and confrontation with N-body simulations, The Astronomical Journal, 136, 1259

    2008

  69. [77]

    2015, title Imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge, International journal of computer vision, 115, 211

    Russakovsky, O., Deng, J., Su, H., et al. 2015, title Imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge, International journal of computer vision, 115, 211

    2015

  70. [78]

    2023, title Morphological classification of radio galaxies with Wasserstein generative adversarial network-supported augmentation, RAS Techniques and Instruments, 2, 264

    Rustige, L., Kummer, J., Griese, F., et al. 2023, title Morphological classification of radio galaxies with Wasserstein generative adversarial network-supported augmentation, RAS Techniques and Instruments, 2, 264

    2023

  71. [79]

    2014, title Green valley galaxies, Serbian Astronomical Journal, 1

    Salim, S. 2014, title Green valley galaxies, Serbian Astronomical Journal, 1

    2014

  72. [80]

    1981, title The response of gas in a galactic disk to bar forcing, Astrophysical Journal, Part 1, vol

    Schwarz, M. 1981, title The response of gas in a galactic disk to bar forcing, Astrophysical Journal, Part 1, vol. 247, July 1, 1981, p. 77-88., 247, 77

    1981

  73. [81]

    K., Jedrzejewski, R., & Giovanelli, R

    Schweizer, F., Ford Jr, W. K., Jedrzejewski, R., & Giovanelli, R. 1987, title The structure and evolution of Hoag's object, Astrophysical Journal, Part 1 (ISSN 0004-637X), vol. 320, Sept. 15, 1987, p. 454-463., 320, 454

    1987

  74. [82]

    C., & Rubin, V

    Schweizer, F., Whitmore, B. C., & Rubin, V. 1983, title Colliding and merging galaxies. II-S0 galaxies with polar rings, Astronomical Journal (ISSN 0004-6256), vol. 88, July 1983, p. 909-925., 88, 909

    1983

  75. [83]

    2021, title Statistically-informed deep learning for gravitational wave parameter estimation, Machine Learning: Science and Technology, 3, 015007

    Shen, H., Huerta, E., O’Shea, E., Kumar, P., & Zhao, Z. 2021, title Statistically-informed deep learning for gravitational wave parameter estimation, Machine Learning: Science and Technology, 3, 015007

    2021

  76. [84]

    2022, title Passive spiral galaxies deeply captured by Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, 74, 612

    Shimakawa, R., Tanaka, M., Bottrell, C., et al. 2022, title Passive spiral galaxies deeply captured by Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, 74, 612

    2022

  77. [85]

    2024, title GALAXY CRUISE: Spiral and ring classifications for bright galaxies at z= 0.01--0.3, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, 76, 191

    Shimakawa, R., Tanaka, M., Ito, K., & Ando, M. 2024, title GALAXY CRUISE: Spiral and ring classifications for bright galaxies at z= 0.01--0.3, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, 76, 191

    2024

  78. [86]

    in the wild

    Slijepcevic, I. V., Scaife, A. M., Walmsley, M., & Bowles, M. 2022, title Learning useful representations for radio astronomy" in the wild" with contrastive learning, arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.08666

    2022 arXiv

  79. [87]

    V., Scaife, A

    Slijepcevic, I. V., Scaife, A. M., Walmsley, M., et al. 2024, title Radio galaxy zoo: towards building the first multipurpose foundation model for radio astronomy with self-supervised learning, RAS Techniques and Instruments, 3, 19

    2024

  80. [88]

    1990, title The varieties of symmetric stellar rings and radial caustics in galaxy disks, Astrophysical Journal, Part 1 (ISSN 0004-637X), vol

    Struck-Marcell, C., & Lotan, P. 1990, title The varieties of symmetric stellar rings and radial caustics in galaxy disks, Astrophysical Journal, Part 1 (ISSN 0004-637X), vol. 358, July 20, 1990, p. 99-115., 358, 99

    1990

  81. [89]

    Szegedy, C., Ioffe, S., Vanhoucke, V., & Alemi, A. 2017, title Inception-v4, inception-resnet and the impact of residual connections on learning, Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence (AAAI-17), 31, 1, 10.1609/aaai.v31i1.11231

    2017 doi

  82. [90]

    2023, title GALAXY CRUISE: Deep insights into interacting galaxies in the local Universe, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, 75, 986

    Tanaka, M., Koike, M., Naito, S., et al. 2023, title GALAXY CRUISE: Deep insights into interacting galaxies in the local Universe, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, 75, 986

    2023

  83. [91]

    1977, title Ring galaxies

    Theys, J., & Spiegel, E. 1977, title Ring galaxies. II, Astrophysical Journal, Part 1, vol. 212, Mar. 15, 1977, p. 616-619, 621-633., 212, 616

    1977

  84. [92]

    C., & Spiegel, E

    Theys, J. C., & Spiegel, E. 1976, title Ring galaxies. I, Astrophysical Journal, vol. 208, Sept. 15, 1976, pt. 1, p. 650-661., 208, 650

    1976

  85. [93]

    2023, title The origin of star-forming rings in S0 galaxies, The Astrophysical Journal, 942, 48

    Tous, J., Dom \' nguez-S \'a nchez, H., Solanes, J., & Perea, J. 2023, title The origin of star-forming rings in S0 galaxies, The Astrophysical Journal, 942, 48

    2023

  86. [94]

    G., et al

    Vega-Ferrero, J., Costantin, L., P \'e rez-Gonz \'a lez, P. G., et al. 2024, title On the nature of disks at high redshift seen by JWST/CEERS with contrastive learning and cosmological simulations, The Astrophysical Journal, 961, 51

    2024

  87. [95]

    Vollmer, B., Soida, M., Beck, R., et al. 2013, title Large-scale radio continuum properties of 19 Virgo cluster galaxies-The influence of tidal interactions, ram pressure stripping, and accreting gas envelopes, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 553, A116

    2013

  88. [96]

    M., Lintott, C., et al

    Walmsley, M., Scaife, A. M., Lintott, C., et al. 2022 a , title Practical galaxy morphology tools from deep supervised representation learning, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 513, 1581

    2022

  89. [97]

    Walmsley, M., Lintott, C., G \'e ron, T., et al. 2022 b , title Galaxy Zoo DECaLS: Detailed visual morphology measurements from volunteers and deep learning for 314 000 galaxies, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 509, 3966

    2022

  90. [98]

    2023, title Galaxy Zoo DESI: Detailed morphology measurements for 8.7 M galaxies in the DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 526, 4768

    Walmsley, M., G \'e ron, T., Kruk, S., et al. 2023, title Galaxy Zoo DESI: Detailed morphology measurements for 8.7 M galaxies in the DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 526, 4768

    2023

  91. [99]

    2022, title Unsupervised galaxy morphological visual representation with deep contrastive learning, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 134, 114508

    Wei, S., Li, Y., Lu, W., et al. 2022, title Unsupervised galaxy morphological visual representation with deep contrastive learning, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 134, 114508

    2022

  92. [100]

    W., Lintott, C

    Willett, K. W., Lintott, C. J., Bamford, S. P., et al. 2013, title Galaxy Zoo 2: detailed morphological classifications for 304 122 galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 435, 2835

    2013

  93. [101]

    G., Olszewski, E., Lesser, M

    Williams, G. G., Olszewski, E., Lesser, M. P., & Burge, J. H. 2004, in Ground-based Instrumentation for Astronomy, Vol. 5492, SPIE, 787--798

    2004

  94. [102]

    G., Adelman , J., Anderson , John E., J., et al

    York , D. G., Adelman , J., Anderson , John E., J., et al. 2000, title The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical Summary , , 120, 1579, 10.1086/301513

    2000 doi

  95. [103]

    Zhan, H. 2021, title The wide-field multiband imaging and slitless spectroscopy survey to be carried out by the Survey Space Telescope of China Manned Space Program, Chinese Science Bulletin, 66, 1290

    2021

  96. [104]

    2020, title A comprehensive survey on transfer learning, Proceedings of the IEEE, 109, 43

    Zhuang, F., Qi, Z., Duan, K., et al. 2020, title A comprehensive survey on transfer learning, Proceedings of the IEEE, 109, 43

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.