Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 64 references

Root stack valuative criterion for good moduli spaces

T0 review · 1 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper proves a root stack valuative criterion for good moduli spaces: a point over a DVR's fraction field that extends to the moduli space extends, after adjoining an nth root of the uniformizer, without changing the residue field.

desk verdict A genuinely new root stack valuative criterion for good moduli spaces, with a careful proof that hinges on one external imperfect-field lemma worth checking. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.08642 v1 pith:YNTRD2ME submitted 2025-07-11 math.AG math.NTmath.RT

Dori Bejleri , Giovanni Inchiostro , Matthew Satriano This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AGmath.NTmath.RT MSC 14D2314L2414L15
keywords rootstackvaluativecriteriongoodmodulispaceArtinreductivegroupschemegerbeparahorictorsorLang-Nishimuratheorem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes a root stack valuative criterion: if $\mathcal{X} \to X$ is a good moduli space of a finite-type Artin stack with affine diagonal over a locally Noetherian scheme, then a point of $\mathcal{X}$ over the fraction field $K$ of a DVR $R$ extends to a point of some root stack $\sqrt[n]{\operatorname{Spec} R} \to \mathcal{X}$ whenever its image in $X$ extends over $\operatorname{Spec} R$. Unlike the classical valuative criterion, the extension preserves the residue field, which makes it an arithmetic tool. The proof reduces to the case of a gerbe banded by a smooth connected linearly reductive group, where the same conclusion holds for reductive groups that are special or whose Weyl groups have order coprime to the residue characteristic (tame Weyl group). The paper draws applications to parahoric extension of torsors, Lang-Nishimura transfer of rational points, gerbes and homogeneous spaces, and integral models for degenerating families of Fano and Calabi-Yau type.

What carries the argument

The central object is the root stack $\sqrt[n]{\operatorname{Spec} R} = [\operatorname{Spec} R[t^{1/n}]/\mu_n]$, which adjoins an $n$th root of a uniformizer while leaving both the fraction field and the residue field unchanged and replacing the closed point by a $\mu_n$-gerbe. The proof also leans on three mechanisms: one-parameter subgroups from cocharacter-closure theory that move a given point to the unique closed orbit, canonical reduction of stabilizers, which converts the polystable neighborhood into a gerbe with linearly reductive band, and a torus and tame-finite reduction in fppf cohomology that supplies the root-stack extension once the gerbe is trivialized.

What would settle it

Compute a $GL_n$-action on an affine scheme over a non-perfect field and test whether a cocharacter-closed orbit outside the unique closed orbit exists, or test Corollary 1.17 on a homogeneous space over a henselian DVR with imperfect residue field: a $K$-point with no $k$-point would disprove the criterion's reduction steps.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, Theorem 1.1, is that the root-stack filling exists: for any $K$-point $\operatorname{Spec} K \to \mathcal{X}$ whose composite $\operatorname{Spec} K \to X$ extends to $\operatorname{Spec} R \to X$, there is a root stack $\sqrt[n]{\operatorname{Spec} R} \to \operatorname{Spec} R$ and a dotted arrow $\sqrt[n]{\operatorname{Spec} R} \to \mathcal{X}$ filling the square; when the generic point is polystable, the closed point can be arranged to map to the polystable locus of the special fiber. The authors prove it by reducing first to polystable points, then to gerbes banded by a smooth connected linearly reductive group, and finally to tori and tame finite group schemes. In the gerbe case, the theorem is stronger than the good-moduli setting: a gerbe for a reductive group that is special or has tame Weyl group admits the same extension property over a root stack. The residue-field preservation is the feature that carries the arithmetic applications.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that over an imperfect residue field the destabilizing one-parameter subgroup moves a given point into the unique closed orbit; the paper verifies this only after passing to a separable closure and using linear reductivity of the stabilizer, so if that implication fails the reduction to polystable points collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A $G$-torsor over the fraction field $K$, for a reductive group with tame Weyl group, is pulled back from a $G$-torsor over some root stack of $\operatorname{Spec} R$, and the needed root degree is uniformly bounded in terms of $G$.
  • Every $G$-bundle over $K$ extends to a parahoric bundle over $R$, and the same extension holds over a global curve with finitely many points removed.
  • The Lang-Nishimura theorem holds for Artin stacks with a proper good moduli space: a regular point over a field transfers to the target stack along any rational map.
  • For a DVR containing $\mathbb{C}$, a $K$-semistable Fano variety admits a proper model with klt singularities whose central fiber is the quotient of a $K$-polystable Fano variety by $\mu_n$; an analogous conclusion holds for boundary polarized Calabi-Yau surface pairs.
  • A rational map from a regular one-dimensional scheme to such a stack extends after replacing the scheme by a root stack along the indeterminacy points.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The residue-field-preserving extension suggests that the heights-on-stacks theory, which currently handles tame stacks, should extend to Artin stacks with a good moduli space, with the root-stack extension playing the role of the tuning stack.
  • The conic example in the paper shows the tameness assumption is sharp in mixed characteristic, so the minimal root degree for a degeneration plausibly records the wild part of the local monodromy, not just the number of components in the special fiber.
  • A parallel proof for adequate moduli spaces would follow once two inputs are supplied: a canonical-reduction statement valid over imperfect residue fields and a replacement for Kempf's theorem there; the gerbe and torus arguments do not otherwise use goodness.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proves a root stack valuative criterion for good moduli spaces: for a finite type Artin stack X over a locally Noetherian scheme with affine diagonal and a good moduli space X -> X, any K-point of X whose image in X extends over a DVR R extends over a root stack of Spec R, with the closed point sent to the closed point of the fiber when the generic point is polystable. The proof reduces the problem to polystable K-points (Proposition 3.2), then to gerbes banded by smooth connected linearly reductive group schemes via canonical reduction of stabilizers (Theorem 3.3), and then proves the gerbe case for reductive bands that are special or have tame Weyl group (Theorem 4.2). The paper closes with applications to parahoric extension of torsors, a Lang-Nishimura statement, gerbes and homogeneous spaces, and models of K-semistable and Calabi-Yau fibrations.

Significance. If correct, the main theorem is a natural and useful extension of the Bresciani-Vistoli root stack criterion from tame stacks to stacks admitting a good moduli space, and the preservation of the residue field is exactly what enables the arithmetic applications. The proof is modular: heavy geometric inputs are delegated to [AHR25], [ER21], [BV24a], and [BHMR17], and Example 4.3 gives a concrete indication of why a tameness assumption is needed in the gerbe statement. The paper is also honest about where the new work is concentrated: Remark 1.4 explicitly names Lemma 3.1 as the replacement for Kempf's theorem when the residue field is not perfect. The main reservation is that this load-bearing lemma relies on an unquoted and insufficiently checked consequence of [BHMR17, Theorem 1.5(ii)]; the rest of the argument is internally coherent and I found no circularity, since [BV24a] is used as an input for tame stacks rather than as a consequence of Theorem 1.1.

major comments (1)
  1. [§3.1, Lemma 3.1] Lemma 3.1 is the only step that converts an arbitrary K-point into a polystable one, and Remark 1.4 explicitly identifies it as the key new ingredient for imperfect residue fields. The proof uses [BHMR17, Theorem 1.5(ii)] to conclude that a cocharacter-closed GL_n(K)-orbit remains cocharacter-closed after base change to the separable closure K^s and that this property is preserved under the displayed quotient presentation [V/GL_n] x_K K^s ≅ [W/G]. Neither the precise statement of that theorem nor the verification that its hypotheses hold for the orbit in question is given. In particular, the argument needs the result for arbitrary GL_n(K)-orbits, not only for orbits with linearly reductive stabilizer, and it needs cocharacter-closedness to be compatible with the local quotient isomorphism. If either implication fails, the limit point z cannot be shown to lie in the unique Zariski-closed orbit, so Proposition 3.2 and hence Theorem 1.1 would not be established for DVRs with imperfect residue fields. Please supply the exact statement of [BHMR17, Theorem 1.5(ii)] and prove the two displayed implications in detail.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Example 4.3] The sentence 'This implies its discriminant must be a square' is not correct as stated for the conic x^2+y^2 = t z^2: a smooth conic over a field has a point if and only if the associated quaternion algebra is split, which is not equivalent to the discriminant being a square. For example, x^2+y^2 = z^2 over Q has a rational point while its discriminant is -1 up to squares. Please rewrite the argument in terms of splitting of the quaternion algebra (-1,t).
  2. [Lemma 3.1] In the proof of Lemma 3.1, after passing to K^s the expression 'a cocharacter closed orbit of G(K)' should presumably read G(K^s); as written the field of definition is ambiguous.
  3. [Theorem 3.3] There is a typo in the proof of Theorem 3.3: 'algorythm' should be 'algorithm'. The paper also contains several OCR-style typos, for example 'st ac k' in the abstract and 'W eyl' in the introduction; a careful proofreading pass is needed.
  4. [Corollary 1.9] The notation 'nm p Spec R' in Corollary 1.9 is typeset incorrectly and should be replaced by a legible iterated root stack such as n√(m√Spec R), so that the statement is understandable without guessing.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the main theorem is derived from external results; self-citations are auxiliary and do not carry the central claim.

full rationale

The load-bearing chain is: Lemma 3.1 reduces an arbitrary K-point to a polystable point using [BHMR17, Thm 1.3 & 1.5(ii)] and [Kem78]; Proposition 3.2 performs the root-stack pushout using [AHHLR24]; Theorem 3.3 passes to a gerbe with linearly reductive band using [ER21] and [BV24a, Thm 3.1]; Theorem 4.2 then proves the gerbe case using [BV24a] for tame finite group schemes and Weyl groups, Proposition 2.7 for maximal tori, and Proposition 4.9 for torus gerbes. Each input is external to the present paper and does not assume the conclusion. The main theorem is not used as an input in its own proof. Self-citations such as [BES24, Prop. 2.3] (factorization as a gerbe) and [BES24, Prop. 2.1] (rigidification/H2 computation) are cited as auxiliary enhancements of external results ([ER21], [Gir65]) and are not the sole support of the central claim. The authors' Remark 1.4 explicitly identifies Lemma 3.1 as the imperfect-field replacement for Kempf's theorem and marks it as a dependency; this is a correctness/robustness caveat about external input, not a circularity. No fitted parameter, renamed quantity, or self-defined construction is presented as a prediction. The theorem is genuinely more general than the cited special cases, so no step reduces by construction to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters and no invented entities. It relies on a set of external theorems in stack theory: etale local structure (AHR25), canonical reduction of stabilizers (ER21), the tame-stack valuative criterion (BV24a), existence of moduli (AHLH23), maximal tori and reductive group schemes (Con14), destabilizing one-parameter subgroups (Kem78, BHMR17), and stack pushouts (AHHLR24, HR23, Ryd11). These are standard published results with proofs; listing them as axioms reflects that the paper's derivation is conditional on their correctness. The hypotheses of the main theorems (affine diagonal, tame Weyl group, specialness) are stated conditions, not hidden assumptions.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Etale local structure: a stack with affine diagonal and a good moduli space is etale locally of the form [V/GL_n] (AHR25, Theorem 6.1).
    Used in Lemma 3.1 and Proposition 3.2 to write X_K as [V/GL_n] with V affine.
  • standard math Canonical reduction of stabilizers: (ER21) applies to stable good moduli spaces and yields a modification X' -> X'' with constant stabilizer dimension.
    Core of Theorem 3.3's reduction to a gerbe.
  • standard math Tame valuative criterion: (BV24a, Theorem 3.1) for tame stacks over a DVR.
    Used in Theorem 4.2 and Propositions 4.9, 4.10 to extend sections of finite tame gerbes.
  • standard math Existence of maximal tori over stacks (Con14, Theorem 3.2.6) and Grothendieck's maximal torus theorem.
    Used in Proposition 2.7 to find a maximal torus over the root stack.
  • standard math Kempf and BHMR17 destabilizing one-parameter subgroups for possibly imperfect fields (Kem78, BHMR17).
    Used in Lemma 3.1; the proof checks cocharacter-closed orbits lie in the unique closed orbit.
  • standard math Pushout theorems for algebraic stacks (AHHLR24, Theorem 4.2; HR23, Theorem A; Ryd11, Theorem B).
    Used in Proposition 3.2 (local root stack pushout), Proposition 1.5 (Mayer-Vietoris), and the henselian reduction in Theorem 1.1.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Root stack valuative criterion for good moduli spaces." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YNTRD2ME

@misc{pith2026250708642,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Root stack valuative criterion for good moduli spaces},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YNTRD2ME}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.08642}
}
read the original abstract

We prove a root stack valuative criterion for good moduli space maps and for gerbes for reductive groups under some mild assumptions on the residue characteristic. We give several applications to parahoric extension for torsors, rational points on stacks, gerbes and homogeneous spaces, and the geometry of fibrations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Moduli of fibered surface pairs from twisted stable maps

    Kenneth Ascher and Dori Bejleri. Moduli of fibered surface pairs from twisted stable maps. Math. Ann. , 374(1-2):1007--1032, 2019

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    M oduli of boundary polarized C alabi- Y au pairs

    Kenneth Ascher, Dori Bejleri, Harold Blum, Kristin DeVleming, Giovanni Inchiostro, Yuchen Liu, and Xiaowei Wang. M oduli of boundary polarized C alabi- Y au pairs . arXiv e-prints , page arXiv:2307.06522, July 2023

    arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    Reductivity of the automorphism group of K -polystable F ano varieties

    Jarod Alper, Harold Blum, Daniel Halpern-Leistner, and Chenyang Xu. Reductivity of the automorphism group of K -polystable F ano varieties. Invent. Math. , 222(3):995--1032, 2020

    2020

  4. [4]

    On brauer groups of tame stacks, 2024

    Niven Achenjang. On brauer groups of tame stacks, 2024

    2024

  5. [5]

    Twisted bundles and admissible covers

    Dan Abramovich, Alessio Corti, and Angelo Vistoli. Twisted bundles and admissible covers. volume 31, pages 3547--3618. 2003. Special issue in honor of Steven L. Kleiman

    2003

  6. [6]

    Stable varieties with a twist

    Dan Abramovich and Brendan Hassett. Stable varieties with a twist. In Classification of algebraic varieties , pages 1--38, 2011

    work page 2011

  7. [7]

    Artin algebraization for pairs with applications to the local structure of stacks and ferrand pushouts

    Jarod Alper, Jack Hall, Daniel Halpern-Leistner, and David Rydh. Artin algebraization for pairs with applications to the local structure of stacks and ferrand pushouts. In Forum of Mathematics, Sigma , volume 12, page e20. Cambridge University Press, 2024

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Existence of moduli spaces for algebraic stacks

    Jarod Alper, Daniel Halpern-Leistner, and Jochen Heinloth. Existence of moduli spaces for algebraic stacks. Inventiones mathematicae , 234(3):949--1038, 2023

    work page 2023

Show all 64 references
  1. [9]

    The \'etale local structure of algebraic stacks

    Jarod Alper, Jack Hall, and David Rydh. The \'etale local structure of algebraic stacks . arXiv e-prints , page https://arxiv.org/pdf/1912.06162.pdf, April 2025

    1912 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Good moduli spaces for A rtin stacks

    Jarod Alper. Good moduli spaces for A rtin stacks. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) , 63(6):2349--2402, 2013

    2013

  3. [11]

    Adequate moduli spaces and geometrically reductive group schemes

    Jarod Alper. Adequate moduli spaces and geometrically reductive group schemes. Algebr. Geom. , 1(4):489--531, 2014

    2014

  4. [12]

    Twisted stable maps to tame A rtin stacks

    Dan Abramovich, Martin Olsson, and Angelo Vistoli. Twisted stable maps to tame A rtin stacks. J. Algebraic Geom. , 20(3):399--477, 2011

    2011

  5. [13]

    Non-normal abelian covers

    Valery Alexeev and Rita Pardini. Non-normal abelian covers. Compositio Mathematica , 148(4):1051--1084, 2012

    2012

  6. [14]

    Compactifying the space of stable maps

    Dan Abramovich and Angelo Vistoli. Compactifying the space of stable maps. J. Amer. Math. Soc. , 15(1):27--75, 2002

    2002

  7. [15]

    Balaji, Kestutis C esnavi c ius, Elden Elmanto, Arnab Kundu, and Alex Youcis

    V. Balaji, Kestutis C esnavi c ius, Elden Elmanto, Arnab Kundu, and Alex Youcis. Grothendieck- S erre phenomena for parahoric groups. In preparation, 2025

    2025

  8. [16]

    Proper splittings and projectivity for good moduli spaces

    Dori Bejleri, Elden Elmanto, and Matthew Satriano. Proper splittings and projectivity for good moduli spaces. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.11057 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Cocharacter-closure and the rational H ilbert-- M umford theorem

    Michael Bate, Sebastian Herpel, Benjamin Martin, and Gerhard R \"o hrle. Cocharacter-closure and the rational H ilbert-- M umford theorem. Mathematische Zeitschrift , 287:39--72, 2017

    2017

  10. [18]

    A primer on good moduli space gerbes

    Dori Bejleri, Giovanni Inchiostro, Siddharth Mathur, and Matthew Satriano. A primer on good moduli space gerbes. In preparation, 2025

    2025

  11. [19]

    Good moduli spaces for boundary polarized calabi-yau surface pairs, 2024

    Harold Blum and Yuchen Liu. Good moduli spaces for boundary polarized calabi-yau surface pairs, 2024

    2024

  12. [20]

    Openness of K -semistability for F ano varieties

    Harold Blum, Yuchen Liu, and Chenyang Xu. Openness of K -semistability for F ano varieties. Duke Math. J. , 171(13):2753--2797, 2022

    2022

  13. [21]

    Relative stability theory of properness of k-moduli

    Harold Blum, Yuchen Liu, Chenyang Xu, and Ziquan Zhuang. Relative stability theory of properness of k-moduli. In preparation, 2025

    2025

  14. [22]

    Linear algebraic groups , volume 126 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics

    Armand Borel. Linear algebraic groups , volume 126 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics . Springer-Verlag, New York, second edition, 1991

    1991

  15. [23]

    Height moduli on cyclotomic stacks and counting elliptic curves over function fields, 2024

    Dori Bejleri, Jun-Yong Park, and Matthew Satriano. Height moduli on cyclotomic stacks and counting elliptic curves over function fields, 2024

    2024

  16. [24]

    Essential dimension of moduli of curves and other algebraic stacks

    Patrick Brosnan, Zinovy Reichstein, and Angelo Vistoli. Essential dimension of moduli of curves and other algebraic stacks. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) , 13(4):1079--1112, 2011. With an appendix by Najmuddin Fakhruddin

    2011

  17. [25]

    Balaji and C

    V. Balaji and C. S. Seshadri. Moduli of parahoric G -torsors on a compact R iemann surface. J. Algebraic Geom. , 24(1):1--49, 2015

    2015

  18. [26]

    An arithmetic valuative criterion for proper maps of tame algebraic stacks

    Giulio Bresciani and Angelo Vistoli. An arithmetic valuative criterion for proper maps of tame algebraic stacks. manuscripta mathematica , 173(3):1061--1071, 2024

    2024

  19. [27]

    Fields of moduli and the arithmetic of tame quotient singularities

    Giulio Bresciani and Angelo Vistoli. Fields of moduli and the arithmetic of tame quotient singularities. Compos. Math. , 160(5):982--1003, 2024

    2024

  20. [28]

    Resolving g-torsors by abelian base extensions

    Vladimir Chernousov, Philippe Gille, and Zinovy Reichstein. Resolving g-torsors by abelian base extensions. Journal of Algebra , 296(2):561--581, 2006

    2006

  21. [29]

    Reduction of structure for torsors over semilocal rings

    Vladimir Chernousov, Philippe Gille, and Zinovy Reichstein. Reduction of structure for torsors over semilocal rings. manuscripta mathematica , 126:465--480, 2008

    2008

  22. [30]

    Reductive group schemes

    Brian Conrad . Reductive group schemes. http://math.stanford.edu/ conrad/papers/luminysga3.pdf, 2014. Soci\'et\'e math\'ematique de France

    2014

  23. [31]

    On equivariant bundles and their moduli spaces

    Chiara Damiolini. On equivariant bundles and their moduli spaces. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris , 362:55--62, 2024

    2024

  24. [32]

    S \'e minaire de g \'e om \'e trie alg \'e brique du bois marie 1962-64

    M Demazure, A Grothendieck, M Artin, JE Bertin, P Gabriel, M Raynaud, and JP Serre. S \'e minaire de g \'e om \'e trie alg \'e brique du bois marie 1962-64. sch \'e mas en groupes ( SGA 3). T ome III : Structures des sch \'e mas en groupes reductiv, 2011

    1962

  25. [33]

    Degenerations of twisted maps to algebraic stacks

    Andrea Di Lorenzo and Giovanni Inchiostro. Degenerations of twisted maps to algebraic stacks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.03806 , 2022

    2022 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Effective morphisms and quotient stacks

    Andrea Di Lorenzo and Giovanni Inchiostro. Effective morphisms and quotient stacks. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN , (11):9091--9113, 2024

    2024

  27. [35]

    2 -cohomologie galoisienne des groupes semi-simples d\' e finis sur les corps locaux

    Jean-Claude Douai. 2 -cohomologie galoisienne des groupes semi-simples d\' e finis sur les corps locaux. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris S\' e r. A-B , 280(6):Aii, A321--A323, 1975

    1975

  28. [36]

    The B atyrev- M anin conjecture for DM stacks

    Ratko Darda and Takehiko Yasuda . The B atyrev- M anin conjecture for DM stacks . arXiv e-prints , page arXiv:2207.03645, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Brauer groups and quotient stacks

    Dan Edidin, Brendan Hassett, Andrew Kresch, and Angelo Vistoli. Brauer groups and quotient stacks. American Journal of Mathematics , 123(4):761--777, 2001

    2001

  30. [38]

    Canonical reduction of stabilizers for A rtin stacks with good moduli spaces

    Dan Edidin and David Rydh. Canonical reduction of stabilizers for A rtin stacks with good moduli spaces. Duke Math. J. , 170(5):827--880, 2021

    2021

  31. [39]

    Ellenberg, Matthew Satriano, and David Zureick-Brown

    Jordan S. Ellenberg, Matthew Satriano, and David Zureick-Brown. Heights on stacks and a generalized B atyrev- M anin- M alle conjecture. Forum Math. Sigma , 11:Paper No. e14, 54, 2023

    2023

  32. [40]

    Soci\'et\'e Math\'ematique de France, Paris, 1992

    Flips and abundance for algebraic threefolds . Soci\'et\'e Math\'ematique de France, Paris, 1992. Papers from the Second Summer Seminar on Algebraic Geometry held at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, August 1991, Ast\'erisque No. 211 (1992)

    1992

  33. [41]

    Loop torsors

    Philippe Gille, Vladimir Chernousov, and Arturo Pianzola. Loop torsors. theory and applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.07294 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Cohomologie non ab\' e lienne; pr\' e liminaires

    Jean Giraud. Cohomologie non ab\' e lienne; pr\' e liminaires. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris , 260:2392--2394, 1965

    1965

  35. [43]

    Le groupe de B rauer

    Alexander Grothendieck. Le groupe de B rauer. II . T h\'eorie cohomologique. In Dix expos\'es sur la cohomologie des sch\'emas , volume 3 of Adv. Stud. Pure Math. , pages 67--87. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1968

    1968

  36. [44]

    Twisted points of quotient stacks, integration and bps-invariants, 2025

    Michael Groechenig, Dimitri Wyss, and Paul Ziegler. Twisted points of quotient stacks, integration and bps-invariants, 2025

    2025

  37. [45]

    Mayer- V ietoris squares in algebraic geometry

    Jack Hall and David Rydh. Mayer- V ietoris squares in algebraic geometry. J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) , 107(5):1583--1612, 2023

    2023

  38. [46]

    Resolution of indeterminacy of rational maps to proper tame stacks, 2025

    Myeong Jae Jeon. Resolution of indeterminacy of rational maps to proper tame stacks, 2025

    2025

  39. [47]

    Inversion of adjunction on log canonicity

    Masayuki Kawakita. Inversion of adjunction on log canonicity. Invent. Math. , 167(1):129--133, 2007

    2007

  40. [48]

    Instability in invariant theory

    George R Kempf. Instability in invariant theory. Annals of Mathematics , 108(2):299--316, 1978

    1978

  41. [49]

    Twisted sheaves and the period-index problem

    Max Lieblich. Twisted sheaves and the period-index problem. Compositio Mathematica , 144(1):1--31, 2008

    2008

  42. [50]

    On the proper moduli spaces of smoothable K \"ahler- E instein F ano varieties

    Chi Li, Xiaowei Wang, and Chenyang Xu. On the proper moduli spaces of smoothable K \"ahler- E instein F ano varieties. Duke Math. J. , 168(8):1387--1459, 2019

    2019

  43. [51]

    Finite generation for valuations computing stability thresholds and applications to k-stability

    Yuchen Liu, Chenyang Xu, and Ziquan Zhuang. Finite generation for valuations computing stability thresholds and applications to k-stability. Annals of Mathematics , 196(2):507--566, 2022

    2022

  44. [52]

    J. S. Milne. S \' e minaire de g\' e om\' e trie alg\' e brique du B ois M arie 1962--64. S ch\' e mas en groupes ( SGA 3) . T om I , T om III [book review of mr2867621; mr2867622]. Eur. Math. Soc. Newsl. , (87):50--52, 2013

    1962

  45. [53]

    Variations on a theme of G rothendieck, 2015

    Johan Martens and Michael Thaddeus. Variations on a theme of G rothendieck, 2015

    2015

  46. [54]

    The GIT stability of polarized varieties via discrepancy

    Yuji Odaka. The GIT stability of polarized varieties via discrepancy. Ann. of Math. (2) , 177(2):645--661, 2013

    2013

  47. [55]

    Algebraic spaces and stacks , volume 62

    Martin Olsson. Algebraic spaces and stacks , volume 62. American Mathematical Soc., 2016

    2016

  48. [56]

    On tamely ramified G -bundles on curves

    Georgios Pappas and Michael Rapoport. On tamely ramified G -bundles on curves. Algebr. Geom. , 11(6):796--829, 2024. With an appendix by Brian Conrad

    2024

  49. [57]

    Classification of singular fibers of hyperelliptic fibrations

    Javier Reyes. Classification of singular fibers of hyperelliptic fibrations. In preparation, 2025

    2025

  50. [58]

    The behavior of essential dimension under specialization

    Zinovy Reichstein and Federico Scavia. The behavior of essential dimension under specialization. \'Epijournal G\'eom. Alg\'ebrique , 6:Art. 21, 28, 2022

    2022

  51. [59]

    \'E tale d \'e vissage, descent and pushouts of stacks

    David Rydh. \'E tale d \'e vissage, descent and pushouts of stacks. Journal of Algebra , 331(1):194--223, 2011

    2011

  52. [60]

    Galois cohomology

    Jean-Pierre Serre. Galois cohomology . Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1997. Translated from the French by Patrick Ion and revised by the author

    1997

  53. [61]

    Bounds for the orders of the finite subgroups of G (k)

    Jean-Pierre Serre. Bounds for the orders of the finite subgroups of G (k). arXiv preprint arXiv:1011.0346 , 2010

    2010 arXiv

  54. [62]

    A nonabelian hodge correspondence for principal bundles in positive characteristic, 2024

    Mao Sheng, Hao Sun, and Jianping Wang. A nonabelian hodge correspondence for principal bundles in positive characteristic, 2024

    2024

  55. [63]

    The stacks project

    The Stacks project authors . The stacks project. https://stacks.math.columbia.edu, 2021

    2021

  56. [64]

    Beyond twisted maps: applications to motivic integration, 2024

    Matthew Satriano and Jeremy Usatine. Beyond twisted maps: applications to motivic integration, 2024

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.