Star Formation Histories of Early-type Dwarfs in Group Environment

Hong Bae Ann; Mira Seo; Myoungwon Jeon

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 215 references

Star Formation Histories of Early-type Dwarfs in Group Environment

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Early-type dwarf star formation is ruled by morphology, with environment secondary.

desk verdict A large, honest sample worth engaging, but the fixed 3-arcsec fiber and untested group-finder leave the quantitative SFH and environmental claims shakier than the authors suggest. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.08975 v1 pith:LNN4ZBNJ submitted 2025-07-11 astro-ph.GA

Hong Bae Ann , Mira Seo , Myoungwon Jeon This is my paper

classification astro-ph.GA

keywords early-typedwarfgalaxiesstarformationhistoriesspectralsynthesiscumulativequenchingchemicalenrichmentgalaxygroupsandclustersmorphology

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to establish that the star formation history (SFH) of an early-type dwarf galaxy is governed first by its morphology and only secondarily by its environment. The authors fit 983 SDSS spectra with the STARLIGHT synthesis code, reconstructing when and from what metallicity gas the stars in five dwarf subtypes (dS0, dE, dSph, dEbc, dEbl) formed, across six environments from the field to the Virgo Cluster. They find that red subtypes (dS0, dE, dSph) assembled most of their stellar mass early and quenched rapidly, while blue subtypes (dEbc, dEbl) show extended or ongoing star formation and host extremely metal-poor stars, which they attribute to continued accretion of pristine gas. Environmental dependence is clearest in low-mass systems: field dwarfs show prolonged star formation and slow enrichment, while Virgo dwarfs quench earlier and enrich faster. The payoff, if the picture holds, is a unified view in which nature (morphology, stellar mass) and nurture (environment) jointly set the evolutionary tracks of the most numerous galaxies in the Universe.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is full spectral fitting with the STARLIGHT synthesis code: each SDSS spectrum is decomposed into a linear combination of simple stellar population (SSP) templates of different ages and metallicities, yielding luminosity- and mass-weighted fractions of stars formed in six metallicity bins from $Z = 0.0001$ to $Z = 0.05$. From these mass fractions the authors construct cumulative star formation histories (cSFHs) and read off two characteristic timescales, $\tau_{50}$ and $\tau_{90}$ (the lookback times when 50% and 90% of the stellar mass had formed), used as formation time and quenching time. Environmental membership comes from a friends-of-friends group finder using a 500 km/s velocity threshold and a linking length set by the sum of virial radii, dividing the sample into the field, poor, intermediate, and rich groups, plus the Ursa Major and Virgo clusters.

What would settle it

Recompute the cumulative star formation histories of Section 4 with the $\Delta V = 1000$ km/s group catalog the paper describes: if the field-versus-Virgo differences in quenching time ($\tau_{90}$) and in the $Z = 0.0001$ stars formed around 3.2 Gyr ago vanish when Ursa Major galaxies are reclassified as Virgo members, the environmental trends are membership artifacts. A complementary check: resolve the stellar populations of the nearest dEbc and dEbl analogues and look for an extremely metal-poor component with ages of roughly 1 to 3 Gyr, which the pristine-accretion interpretation predicts should be present.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that cumulative star formation histories (cSFHs) of early-type dwarfs separate cleanly by morphological subtype. dSph galaxies formed roughly 80% of their stellar mass by a lookback time near 6.3 Gyr ago and quenched earliest, around 3.3 Gyr ago, with the smallest environmental dependence, marking them as likely primordial systems. dE and dS0 galaxies quenched somewhat later, around 1 to 2 Gyr ago, and a substantial share of them show the signature of environmental transformation from late-type progenitors rather than primordial assembly. The blue subtypes stand apart: dEbc and dEbl galaxies formed a substantial fraction of their stars during a recent star-forming episode and show extremely metal-poor populations ($Z = 0.0001$) that are absent from the red subtypes, including a distinct population formed around 3.2 Gyr ago that appears in the field but not in Virgo. The authors read this as continued accretion of pristine gas in low-density environments, and contrast it with Virgo, where high-mass dwarfs enrich rapidly and form metal-rich ($Z = 0.05$) stars from recycled gas as early as 1.5 Gyr ago. Metallicity evolution is slowest in low-mass field galaxies and fastest in high-mass cluster galaxies, which grounds the paper's dual-dependence picture: morphology sets the overall shape of the SFH while environment and mass modulate its timing, duration, and chemical enrichment.

Load-bearing premise

Every environmental comparison rests on the assumption that the friends-of-friends group catalog built with a 500 km/s velocity threshold picks out the true physical groups; the paper itself reports in Section 2.2.2 that raising the threshold to 1000 km/s merges the Ursa Major cluster into Virgo and changes Virgo membership from 1068 to 1750 galaxies, yet no environmental result is checked against that alternative membership.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If morphology is primary, then dSph galaxies, with early, rapid star formation and little environmental variation, can be treated as primordial relics, whereas many dS0 and dE galaxies are environmentally transformed late-type systems.
Environmental quenching acts most strongly in shallow potential wells: at low stellar mass, Virgo dwarfs quench far earlier than field dwarfs, while at high mass the star formation history hardly changes with environment.
Blue early-type dwarfs keep forming stars in every environment studied, so surveys that treat dEbc and dEbl as quiescent early-type populations will misclassify a large, actively star-forming component of the dwarf population.
Late-time accretion of pristine gas is a genuine channel for star formation in low-density environments and delays chemical enrichment there, whereas cluster environments suppress such inflow and instead recycle enriched gas.
The physical state of a cluster, illustrated by the Ursa Major versus Virgo comparison, matters for quenching, not just the number of member galaxies.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A corollary the paper leaves implicit: any dwarf sample selected by red color or red-sequence membership alone will mix primordial dSph-like galaxies, transformed dS0/dE-like galaxies, and the star-forming dEbc/dEbl population, so quenching conclusions drawn from such mixed samples inherit a selection bias.
The paper's own Section 2.2.2 shows that raising the group-finding velocity threshold from 500 to 1000 km/s merges Ursa Major into Virgo and grows Virgo membership from 1068 to 1750 galaxies; since all environmental trends are quoted only for the 500 km/s catalog, a re-analysis with the 1000 km/s catalog would test whether the field-versus-cluster differences are physical or membership artifacts.
The pristine-accretion interpretation yields a testable prediction the authors do not state: resolved stellar populations in nearby dEbc/dEbl analogues should contain an extremely metal-poor ($Z \lesssim 0.0004$) component with ages near 1 to 3 Gyr, and their cold gas reservoirs should be largely unenriched.
If morphological subtype really is the primary driver, then the classification itself, not environment, is the organizing variable for dwarf evolution; a next step would be to check whether the five-subtype SFH ordering persists in a sample selected independently of the CVCG catalog and its visual classifications.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

This paper is worth taking seriously. It is a genuinely large and homogeneous STARLIGHT analysis of 983 early-type dwarfs, and the first direct comparison of Ursa Major and Virgo cluster dwarfs in this framework. The cSFH diagnostics and the KS tests on cumulative histories are good practice, and the paper is transparent about two key limitations: the fiber sampling problem and the group-finder velocity threshold.

The soft spots are real, and they are in proportion. The biggest is the aperture issue, which the authors state in Section 2.1 but never mitigate. The 3-arcsec fiber covers the central 240 pc at Virgo and up to ~600 pc at the sample edge, so the derived SFHs are central, not whole-galaxy. This matters because dEbc galaxies are defined by a blue core: the fiber preferentially selects the young, low-metallicity population that drives the claim of recent pristine-gas accretion. The same aperture bias plausibly strengthens the morphology—SFH ordering that is the central result. Environmental comparisons are also affected, since field galaxies are generally more distant and the fiber covers a larger physical region. This is a load-bearing concern for the quantitative claims, even if the qualitative ordering survives.

The group-finding sensitivity is secondary but not negligible. The paper documents that changing Delta V from 500 to 1000 km/s merges UMa into Virgo and increases Virgo membership by ~64%, yet all environmental trends rely on the 500 km/s catalog with no robustness check. The lack of error bars on the SFH and cSFH figures is a minor but annoying gap, especially given the bootstrap errors that do appear later. And the metallicity interpretation inherits known STARLIGHT systematics; the 0.3 dex offset against pPXF is mentioned, but the Z=0.0001 population sits at the edge of the template grid, so the pristine-accretion story needs more caution.

The paper's own admissions are honest, but honesty about a limitation does not remove it. I would not desk-reject this; it deserves serious refereeing. The right referee will ask for aperture-aware tests or explicit caveats in the interpretation, a robustness check on the group finder, and propagated uncertainties on the key figures. Who is this for? Dwarf-galaxy evolution folks. If the authors tighten the quantitative claims, this becomes a useful reference sample.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents STARLIGHT full spectral fits to SDSS DR7 spectra of 983 early-type dwarf galaxies classified into five subtypes (dS0, dE, dEbc, dSph, dEbl), and compares their derived star formation histories and metallicity distributions across six environments from the field to the Virgo Cluster. The central claim is that morphology is the primary driver of SFH shape, with environment playing a secondary but non-negligible role: red subtypes quench early, blue subtypes show extended or ongoing star formation and host extremely metal-poor stars attributed to pristine gas accretion. The analysis also examines cumulative SFHs, characteristic timescales tau50 and tau90, quenching times, and mass-environment trends.

Significance. If the main conclusions hold, the paper provides a valuable, statistically homogeneous mapping of early-type dwarf SFHs across morphology and environment, extending beyond Local Group resolved studies to a sample of nearly a thousand galaxies. The use of a common spectral fitting method, the quantitative cSFH metrics with bootstrap uncertainties, the KS-test comparisons, and the explicit documentation of the group-finder's sensitivity are strengths. The paper is also candid about the fiber-aperture limitation. However, because the key morphology-environment ordering rests on central 3-arcsec fiber spectra and a single group-finding configuration, the quantitative conclusions about the primacy of morphology and the interpretation of pristine gas accretion require additional robustness checks before the results can be regarded as secure.

major comments (4)

[Section 2.1, Figures 5-9]
[Section 2.2.2, Figures 8-14]
[Section 3.1 and Section 5.1]
[Section 5.2, Figure 14]

minor comments (4)

[Throughout]
[Section 2.1]
[Section 3.1]
[Section 4.3 and Figure 10-11]

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: SFHs are derived from public SDSS spectra with the external STARLIGHT code; self-citations are to the morphological input catalog and prior validation, not to the load-bearing inference.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained against external data and tools. SFHs are obtained by full spectral fitting of SDSS DR7 spectra with STARLIGHT (Cid Fernandes et al. 2005; Bruzual & Charlot 2003 SSPs), not from the morphological labels or from the authors' previous SFH papers. The morphological subtypes from Ann et al. (2015) are an input catalog defined from visual morphology and colors; they are not derived from the fitted SFHs, so the morphology-SFH comparison is an empirical cross-correlation rather than a definitional reduction. The cited validation (Seo & Ann 2023; Ann & Seo 2024) checks STARLIGHT's reliability, including a pPXF cross-comparison, and is not the basis of the central claim. The acknowledged color-based definitions of dEbc/dEbl mean that their blue colors already hint at young stellar populations, so the qualitative statement that blue subtypes have extended star formation is partly an expected selection effect; however, the quantitative cSFHs, tau_50/tau_90 timescales, and the non-trivial red-subtype distinctions (e.g., dSph earliest quenching) carry independent content. The fixed 3-arcsec SDSS fiber and the Delta V = 500 km/s group-finder sensitivity are documented limitations or robustness concerns, not circularities, because no fitted parameter is being relabeled as a prediction. No circular step can be exhibited from the paper's equations.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on two classes of inputs: standard spectral fitting assumptions (SSP libraries, [alpha/Fe] = 0, STARLIGHT recoverability) and the adopted group-finding configuration (velocity threshold 500 km/s, limiting magnitude -15.2, virial-radius linking length). The paper validates the spectral fitting only through its own prior tests and a pPXF comparison with a 0.3 dex metallicity offset, and it validates the group finding only by listing how membership changes with the velocity threshold, not by testing the stability of its scientific conclusions.

free parameters (6)

Group-finding velocity threshold Delta V = 500 km/s
Hand-chosen linking velocity in the friends-of-friends algorithm. The paper shows that changing it to 1000 km/s merges Ursa Major into Virgo and changes group memberships substantially (Section 2.2.2), so all environmental comparisons depend on this choice.
Background density limiting magnitude M_lim = -15.2
Adopted to define a volume-limited sample within z = 0.01 for the nearest-neighbor density calculation, which affects the field/group density assignment (Section 2.2.2).
Red sequence baseline fit = Linear fit to dS0, dE, and dSph galaxies in the u-r versus M_r plane
Used to define D/sigma, the color deviation from the red sequence, characterizing subtypes in Figure 1. Not used in SFH derivation directly, but underpins subtype color interpretations.
Mass bin boundaries for Figure 14 = Median stellar mass plus or minus one standard error
Chosen to split low- and high-mass galaxies. The boundaries are derived from the sample itself and are not justified independently; results may be sensitive to this choice.
3 sigma clipping thresholds = 3 sigma
Applied iteratively when computing median tau_BB - tau_50 and tau_50 - tau_90 and in regression fits (Sections 4.3, 4.4). The paper notes that for dEbc galaxies many late-quenching members are excluded by this clipping, which changes the reported slope.
STARLIGHT fitted extinction A_V and velocity dispersion sigma per galaxy = Fitted per galaxy
These are standard parameters fitted by STARLIGHT to each spectrum. They are inputs to the derived SFHs and metallicities, and their uncertainties are not propagated into the quoted age and metallicity distributions.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption STARLIGHT spectral synthesis correctly recovers stellar ages and metallicities from SDSS spectra of early-type dwarfs.
Invoked across Section 2.2.1 and throughout the paper. The authors validate it using their own mock tests (Seo & Ann 2023) and a pPXF comparison (Ann & Seo 2024), which shows a 0.3 dex systematic offset in metallicity, so the assumption is only partially supported.
domain assumption Bruzual & Charlot (2003) SSP models with [alpha/Fe] = 0 and six metallicity bins adequately represent the stellar populations of early-type dwarfs.
These models are the basis of the STARLIGHT fits (Section 2.2.1). Simplifications such as fixed alpha enhancement and discrete metallicity bins could bias derived metallicities and SFH shapes.
domain assumption SDSS 3-arcsecond fiber spectra are representative of the central stellar populations, and aperture corrections yield reliable total stellar masses.
Section 2.1 notes the fiber diameter is smaller than the galaxy extent, so spectra reflect central regions only. Stellar masses are derived from model fluxes with an aperture correction from Ann & Seo (2024), but the correction is not independently validated here.
domain assumption The friends-of-friends algorithm with Delta V = 500 km/s and virial-radius linking length identifies physically associated galaxy groups.
Section 2.2.2 describes the group finding. The paper documents that membership changes dramatically with the velocity threshold but does not test whether the scientific conclusions are robust to this choice.
domain assumption Morphological subtypes from Ann et al. (2015) correspond to physically meaningful classes.
The entire analysis is stratified by these subtypes, which were defined in the authors' own catalog. The paper does not test alternative classification schemes.
ad hoc to paper The absence of stars with Z = 0.0001 in red early-type dwarfs indicates pre-enrichment rather than a spectral fitting artifact.
Section 5.1 interprets the metallicity floor as evidence of Population III pre-enrichment. Given the known age-metallicity degeneracy and the STARLIGHT metallicity offset, this interpretation is not uniquely forced by the data.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Star Formation Histories of Early-type Dwarfs in Group Environment." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LNN4ZBNJ

@misc{pith2026250708975,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Star Formation Histories of Early-type Dwarfs in Group Environment},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LNN4ZBNJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.08975}
}

read the original abstract

We investigate the star formation histories (SFHs) of 983 early-type dwarf galaxies classified into five morphological subtypes, dS0, dE, dEbc, dSph, and dEbl,across six environments ranging from the field to rich clusters such as Ursa Major and Virgo. Using full spectral fitting of SDSS spectra with the starlight code, we derive detailed SFHs and chemical enrichment patterns. We find that SFHs are primarily shaped by morphology, with environment playing a secondary but non-negligible role. Red early-type dwarfs (dS0, dE, dSph) typically formed most of their stars early and quenched rapidly, whereas blue early-type dwarfs (dEbc, dEbl) exhibit extended or ongoing star formation and host extremely metal-poor stars, suggesting continued pristine gas accretion. Environmental dependence is clearest in low-mass systems: field galaxies often show prolonged SFHs and delayed enrichment, while Virgo Cluster galaxies tend to quench earlier and enrich more rapidly. Cumulative SFHs reinforce these trends, with dSph galaxies showing the earliest quenching and least environmental dependence, indicating a likely primordial origin. Metallicity evolution also varies with mass and environment, progressing most slowly in low-mass field galaxies and most rapidly in high-mass cluster galaxies. Our results highlight the combined influence of morphology, stellar mass, and environment on the evolutionary diversity of early-type dwarfs, and suggest that both internal processes (nature) and external conditions (nurture) are intricately linked in shaping their star formation and chemical enrichment histories.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.08975 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** a) Colour–magnitude diagram for early-type dwarf galaxies. The five subtypes are distinguished by symbols and colours as indicated in the legend. The dotted black line shows the linear fit to the combined distribution of dS0, dE, and dSph galaxies, which defines the fiducial red sequence. (b) Mean deviation from the red sequence, normalised by the RMS dispersion (D/σ), for each morphological subtype. We used SDSS … view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Spectrum of two sample galaxies IC 3653 and MCG+10- 15-083. We plot observed spectra in black and the model spectra in red. Observed and model fluxes are normalized by the flux at λ0 = 4020 ˚A. pPXF. A similar discrepancy was reported by Mentz et al. (2016) for the dE galaxy NGC 1396 in the Fornax Cluster. Stellar masses were derived from the model fluxes obtained through STARLIGHT, using galaxy distances listed in … view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Fraction of dwarf galaxy types as a function of the number of group members. The dwarf types are adopted from CVCG (Ann et al. 2015): dS0 (dwarf lenticular), dE (dwarf elliptical), dEbc(blue-cored dwarf elliptical), dSph (dwarf spheroidal) and dEb(blue dwarf elliptical). ground density was normalized by the mean surface density of the local universe, Σ. Figure ¯ 3 displays the distribution of normalized background … view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (10 more)

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Stellar mass fractions as a function of stellar age, separated by morphological type. The contributions from different metallicities are color-coded as follows: Z = 0.0001 (blue), Z = 0.0004 (cyan), Z = 0.004 (green), Z = 0.008 (brown), Z = 0.02 (magenta) and Z = 0.05 …

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Star formation histories (SFHs) of early-type dwarf galaxies across six different environments: field, poor group, intermediate group, rich group, UMa Cluster, and Virgo Cluster. Each panel shows the distribution of stellar mass fraction as a function of stellar age (i…

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Luminosity-weighted mean metallicity (Z) as a function of luminosity-weighted mean stellar age. Morphological types are distinguished by different symbols and colors. yet the few stars formed during this epoch are predominantly extremely metal-rich (Z = 0.05). Recent s…

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Cumulative star formation histories (cSFHs) of early-type dwarf galaxies in different group environments. Morphological types are distinguished by colors, as indicated in the legend. In poor group environments, the relative differences in star formation rates among ear…

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Cumulative star formation histories (cSFHs) of early-type dwarf galaxies, divided by morphological type. Different environments are distinguished by colors, as indicated in the legend. The final panel (bottom-right) of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png]

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: Star formation histories of early-type dwarf galaxies by environment. Each panel shows the median values of τBB − τ50 (x-axis) and τ50 − τ90 (y-axis) for different morphological subtypes (coloured symbols). Here, the terms τ50 and τ90 indicate the lookback times when …

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: Star formation histories of early-type dwarf galaxies by morphological subtype. Each panel shows the median values of τBB −τ50 (x-axis) and τ50 − τ90 (y-axis) for a given subtype, with different environments distinguished by colour. Error bars indicate the 68% bootstr…

**Figure 12.** Figure 12: Quenching time (log(τ90)) versus stellar mass for each subtype of early-type dwarf galaxies. The black short-dashed lines indicate the regression fits with 3σ clipping for each subtype, while the green line shows the global regression fit. Pearson correlation coeffici…

**Figure 13.** Figure 13: Cumulative star formation histories of early-type dwarf galaxies in the Virgo Cluster, divided into inner (r < rm) and outer (r > rm) regions, where rm is the mean clustercentric distance of the Virgo member galaxies. Solid lines represent the mean cSFHs and dotted li…

**Figure 14.** Figure 14: Stellar mass fractions of dS0, dEbc and dSph galaxies in the field (left panels) and in the Virgo Cluster (right panels). Contributions from different metallicities are color-coded as indicated in the legend. galaxies during this phase. The infalling pristine gas mix…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

215 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages

[1]

G., Moore, B., Bower, R

Abadi, M. G., Moore, B., Bower, R. G., 1999, MNRAS, 308, 947

1999
[2]

Aguerri, J. A. L., Iglesias-Páramo, J., Vílchez, J. M., Muñoz-Tuñón, C., Sánchez-Janssen, R. , 130, 475
[3]

B., 2014, , 47, 1

Ann H. B., 2014, , 47, 1

2014
[4]

B., Seo, M., Ha, D

Ann, H. B., Seo, M., Ha, D. K., 2015, , 217, 27

2015
[5]

B., 2017, , 50,111

Ann, H. B., 2017, , 50,111

2017
[6]

B., Seo, M

Ann, H. B., Seo, M. 2024, MNRAS, 530, 210

2024
[7]

Aparicio, A., Carrera, R., Martínez-Delgado, D., 2001, , 122, 2524

2001
[8]

V., , 2007, , 381, 263

Asari, N. V., , 2007, , 381, 263

2007

Show all 215 references

[9]

I., Smith, R., 2103, , 432, 274

Assmann, P., Fellhauer, M., Wilkinson, M. I., Smith, R., 2103, , 432, 274
[10]

Bacon R. et. al. 2010, SPIE, 7735, 08

2010
[11]

D., Binggeli, B., Jerjen, H., 2002, A&A, 391, 823

Barazza, F. D., Binggeli, B., Jerjen, H., 2002, A&A, 391, 823

2002
[12]

D., Binggeli, B., Jerjen, H., 20023 A&A, 40 7, 121

Barazza, F. D., Binggeli, B., Jerjen, H., 20023 A&A, 40 7, 121
[13]

Barkana, R., Loeb, A., 1999, , 523, 54

1999
[14]

H., Fan, X., White, R

Becker, R. H., Fan, X., White, R. L. et al., 2001, AJ, 122, 2850

2001
[15]

F., Abadi, M

Benitez-Llambay, A., Navarro, J. F., Abadi, M. G. et al., 2013, ApJ, 763, L41

2013
[16]

F., Abadi, M

Benitez-Llambay, A., Navarro, J. F., Abadi, M. G. et al., 2015, , 450, 4207

2015
[17]

L., Cassisi, S., Aparicio, A., Piotto, G., 2018, , 476, 718

Bettinelli, M., Hidalgo, S. L., Cassisi, S., Aparicio, A., Piotto, G., 2018, , 476, 718

2018
[18]

L., Cassisi, S., Aparicio, A., Piotto, G., Valdes, F., Walker, A

Bettinelli, M., Hidalgo, S. L., Cassisi, S., Aparicio, A., Piotto, G., Valdes, F., Walker, A. R., 2019, , 487, 5862

2019
[19]

M., 1991, A&A, 252, 27

Binggeli, B., & Cameron, L. M., 1991, A&A, 252, 27

1991
[20]

M., 1993, 98, 297

Binggeli, B., & Cameron, L. M., 1993, 98, 297

1993
[21]

C., 1995, 298, 63

Binggeli, B., & Popescu, C. C., 1995, 298, 63

1995
[22]

Binggeli, B., Sandage, A., & Tammann, G. A. 1985, AJ, 90, 1681

1985
[23]

R., Faber, S

Blumenthal, G. R., Faber, S. M., Primack, J. R., Rees, M. J., 1985, Nature, 313, 72

1985
[24]

Boselli, A., Boissier, S., Cortese, L., Gavazzi, G., 2008, , 674, 742

2008
[25]

Boselli, A., Fossati, M., Sun, M., 2022, The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, 30, 3

2022
[26]

S., Ricotti, M., 2009, ApJ, 693, 1859

Bovill, M. S., Ricotti, M., 2009, ApJ, 693, 1859

2009
[27]

, 2012, , 427, 127

Bressanm A. , 2012, , 427, 127

2012
[28]

D., Tremoni, C., Kauffmann, G., Hexkman, T., Brinkmann, J., 2004, , 351, 1151

Brinchmann, J., Charlot, S., Whitw, S. D., Tremoni, C., Kauffmann, G., Hexkman, T., Brinkmann, J., 2004, , 351, 1151

2004
[29]

Bromm, Volker; Yoshida, Naoki; Hernquist, Lars; McKee, Christopher F., 2009, nature, 459, 498

2009
[30]

M., 2014, , 796, 91

Brown,T. M., 2014, , 796, 91

2014
[31]

Bruzual, G.; Charlot, S., 2003, , 344, 1000

2003
[32]

Buta, R. J. 2011, arXiv 1102- 0550

2011
[33]

Buta, R. J. 2013, in Planets, Stars and Stellar Systems, vol 6, ed. Terry D. Oswalt, & Willuam, C. Keel (New York: Springer Science+Business Media Dordrechr), 1

2013
[34]

Buta, R. J. , 2015, , 217, 32

2015
[35]

Buyle, P., De Rijcke, S., Michielsen, D., Baes, M., Dejonghe, H., 2005, , 360, 853

2005
[36]

M., Moretti, A., Fritx, J., Fasanp, G., 2018, , 481, 3456

Calvi, R., Vulcani, B., Poggianto, B. M., Moretti, A., Fritx, J., Fasanp, G., 2018, , 481, 3456

2018
[37]

Cappellari, M., 2017, , 466, 798

2017
[38]

Cappellari, M., Emsellem, E., 2004, , 116, 138

2004
[39]

A., Clayton, G

Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., Mathis, J. S., 1989, , 345, 245

1989
[40]

Carrera, R., Aparicio, A., Martínez-Delgado, D., Alonso-García, J., 2002, , 123, 3199

2002
[41]

Chung, J., Rey, S.-C., Sung, E.-C.,Kim, S., Lee, Y., Lee, W., 2019, , 879, 97

2019
[42]

Chung, J., Kim, S., Rey, S.-C., Lee, Y., 2021, , 923, 235

2021
[43]

F., Prugniel, P

Chilingarian, I., Cayatte, V., Durret, F., Adami, C., Balkowski, C., Chemin, L., Lagana, T. F., Prugniel, P. 2008, , 486, 85

2008
[44]

2009, Sci, 326, 1379

Chilingarian, I., Cayatte, V., Revaz, Y., et al. 2009, Sci, 326, 1379

2009
[45]

S., 2010

Choi, Y.-Y., Han, D.-H., Kim, S. S., 2010. , 43, 191

2010
[46]

Cid Fernandes, R., Gonzalez. D. R. M., Schmitt, H., Storchi-Bergmann, T., Martins, L. P., Perez, E., Heckman, T., Leitherer, C., Schaerer, D., , 605, 105
[47]

M., 2005, , 358, 363

Cid Fernandes, R., Mateus, A., Sodre, L., Stasiriska, G., Gomes, J. M., 2005, , 358, 363

2005
[48]

, 2013, , 557, 86

Cid Fernandes, R. , 2013, , 557, 86

2013
[49]

Cid Fernandes, R., 2018, , 480, 4480

2018
[50]

, 2019, , 887, 112

Cignoni, M. , 2019, , 887, 112

2019
[51]

Conselice, C., O¡¯Neil, K., Gallagher, J., Wyse, R., 2003, , 591, 167

2003
[52]

L., Songaila, A., Hu, E

Cowie, L. L., Songaila, A., Hu, E. M., Cohen, J. G. 1996, , 112, 839

1996
[53]

L., Songaila, A., 1998, Nature, 394, 44

Cowie, L. L., Songaila, A., 1998, Nature, 394, 44

1998
[54]

Croom, S. M. , 2012, , 421, 872

2012
[55]

, 2007, , 670, 156

Daddi, E. , 2007, , 670, 156

2007
[56]

W., Shull, J

Danforth, C. W., Shull, J. M., 2008, , 679, 194

2008
[57]

et al., 2018, , 480, 1740

Dawoodbhoy, T. et al., 2018, , 480, 1740

2018
[58]

J., 1976, ApJ, 208, 13

Davis M., Geller M. J., 1976, ApJ, 208, 13

1976
[59]

de Boer, T. J. L., Tolstoy, E., Hill, V., Saha, A., Olszewski, E. W., Mateo, M., Starkenburg, E., Battaglia, G., Walker, M. G., 2012, A&A, 544, 73

2012
[60]

de Boer, T. J. L., Tolstoy, E., Lemasle, B., Saha, A., Olszewski, E. W., Mateo, M., Irwin, M. J., Battaglia, G., 2014, A&A, 572, 10

2014
[61]

W., Hau, G

De Rijcke, S., Dejonghe, H., Zeilinger, W. W., Hau, G. K. T. 2003, A&A, 119, 125

2003
[62]

W., & Hau, G

de Rijcke, S., Michielsen, D., Dejonghe, H., Zeilinger, W. W., & Hau, G. K. T., 2005, A&A, 438, 491

2005
[63]

Dekel A., Silk J., 1986, ApJ, 303, 39

1986
[64]

, 2007, , 374, 809

De Lucia, G. , 2007, , 374, 809

2007
[65]

F., Fattahi, A., Simpson, C

Digby, R., Navarro, J. F., Fattahi, A., Simpson, C. M., Oman, K. A., Gomez, F. A., Frenk, C. S., Grand, R. J. J., Pakmor, R., 2019, , 485, 5423

2019
[66]

E., 2002, , 332,91

Dolphin, A. E., 2002, , 332,91

2002
[67]

A., Peter, A

Dooley, G. A., Peter, A. H. G., Yang, T., Willman, B., Griffen, B. F., Frebel, A., 2017, , 471, 4894

2017
[68]

1980, , 236, 351

Dressler, A. 1980, , 236, 351

1980
[69]

Durrell, P. R. 1997, , 113, 531

1997
[70]

L., Mac Low, M.-M., 2019, , 482, 1304

Emerick, A., Bryan, G. L., Mac Low, M.-M., 2019, , 482, 1304

2019
[71]

F., Frenk, C

Fattahi, A., Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., Oman, K. A., Sawala, T., Schaller, M., 2018, , 476, 3816

2018
[72]

Ferrara, A., Tolstoy, E., 2000, , 313, 291

2000
[73]

, 2006, , 164, 33

Ferrarese, L. , 2006, , 164, 33

2006
[74]

et al., 2017, , 472, 2945

Fitts, A. et al., 2017, , 472, 2945

2017
[75]

D., Kirby, E

Frebel, A., Simon, J. D., Kirby, E. N., 2014, , 2014, 786, 74

2014
[76]

, 2021, ,909,192

Gallart, C. , 2021, ,909,192

2021
[77]

, 2015, , 811, L18

Gallart, C. , 2015, , 811, L18

2015
[78]

M., Tremonti, C., A2006, , 362, 41

Gallazzi, A, Charlot, S., Brinchmann, J., White, Simon D. M., Tremonti, C., A2006, , 362, 41
[79]

M., A2008, , 383, 1439

Gallazzi, A, Brinchmann, J., Charlot, S., White, Simon D. M., A2008, , 383, 1439
[80]

, 2019, , 489, 45

Garrison-Kimmel, S. , 2019, , 489, 45

2019
[81]

Gavazzi, G., Boselli, A., Cortese, L., Arosio, I., Gallazzi, A., Pedotti, P., Carrasco, L., 2006, , 446, 839

2006
[82]

Astrophys, 12, 485

Ge, C., Gu, Q.-S., 2012, Research in Astron. Astrophys, 12, 485

2012
[83]

P., 2002, , 124, 3087

Geha, M., Guhathakurta, P., van der Marel, R. P., 2002, , 124, 3087

2002
[84]

P., 2003, , 126, 1794

Geha, M., Guhathakurta, P., van der Marel, R. P., 2003, , 126, 1794

2003
[85]

P., Guhathakurta, P., et al

Geha, M., van der Marel, R. P., Guhathakurta, P., et al. 2010, ApJ, 711, 361

2010
[86]

Y., 2000, , 542, 535

Gnedin, N. Y., 2000, , 542, 535

2000
[87]

W., Guzman, R., 2003, AJ 125, 2936

Graham, A. W., Guzman, R., 2003, AJ 125, 2936

2003
[88]

W., , 2017, , 840, 68

Graham, A. W., , 2017, , 840, 68

2017
[89]

W., Jerjen, H., Guzman, R., 2003, AJ 126, 1787

Graham, A. W., Jerjen, H., Guzman, R., 2003, AJ 126, 1787

2003
[90]

Graham, A. W. . 2019, , 487, 4999

2019
[91]

K., Gallagher, J

Grebel, E. K., Gallagher, J. S. III, van der Marvel, R. P., 2003, , 125, 1926

2003
[92]

Gu, Q., Zhao, Y., Shi, L., Peng, Z., Luo, X., 2006, , 131, 806

2006
[93]

, 2015, , 450, 2749

Guglielmo, V. , 2015, , 450, 2749

2015
[94]

E., Gott, III J

Gunn J. E., Gott, III J. R., \ 1972, ApJ, 176, 1

1972
[95]

, 2012, , 144, 87

Hallenbeck, G. , 2012, , 144, 87

2012
[96]

, 2019, , 625, 94

Hamraz, E. , 2019, , 625, 94

2019
[97]

Hartwick, F. D. A., 1876, , 209, 418
[98]

Hernandez, X., Gilmore, G., Valls-Gabaud, D., 2000, , 317, 8

2000
[99]

Irwin, M

Helmi, A. Irwin, M. J., Tolstoy, E. , 2006, , 651, L12

2006
[100]

L., 2012, ASP Conference Series, 458, 287

Hidalgo, S. L., 2012, ASP Conference Series, 458, 287

2012
[101]

L., , 2013, , 778, 103

Hidalgo, S. L., , 2013, , 778, 103

2013
[102]

W., 1963, ,68, 691

Hodge, P. W., 1963, ,68, 691

1963
[103]

W., 1973, , 182, 671

Hodge, P. W., 1973, , 182, 671

1973
[104]

P., Geller, M

Huchra, J. P., Geller, M. J., 1082, , 257, 423
[105]

2012, , 745, L24

Janz, J., . 2012, , 745, L24

2012
[106]

2014, , 786, 105

Janz, J., . 2014, , 786, 105

2014
[107]

H., Milosavljevic, M., 2015, , 452,1152

Jeon, M., Bromm, V., Pawlik, A. H., Milosavljevic, M., 2015, , 452,1152

2015
[108]

Jeon, M., Besla, G., Bromm, V., 2017, , 848, 85

2017
[109]

2000, A&A, 358, 849

Jerjen, H., Kalnajs, A., Binggeli, B. 2000, A&A, 358, 849

2000
[110]

2001, in ASP Conf

Jerjen, H., Kalnajs, A., Binggeli, B. 2001, in ASP Conf. Ser. 230, Galaxy Disks and Disk Galaxies, ed. J. G. Funes & E. M. Corsini (San Francisco, CA: ASP), 239

2001
[111]

Joshi, G. D. , 2021, arXiv:2101.12226

2021 arXiv
[112]

D., Makarov, D

Karachentsev, I. D., Makarov, D. I., 2013, , 145, 101

2013
[113]

D., Kaisina, E

Karachentsev, I. D., Kaisina, E. I., Makarov, D. I., 2013, , 147, 13

2013
[114]

, 2003, , 341, 54

Kauffmann, G. , 2003, , 341, 54

2003
[115]

, 2004, , 353, 713 Kazantzidis, S., Mayer, L., Callegari, S., Dotti, M., Moustakas, L

Kauffmann, G. , 2004, , 353, 713 Kazantzidis, S., Mayer, L., Callegari, S., Dotti, M., Moustakas, L. A., 2017, , 836, L13

2004
[116]

A., 2017, , 836, L13

Kazantzidis, S., Mayer, L., Callegari, S., Dotti, M., Moustakas, L. A., 2017, , 836, L13

2017
[117]

-H., Ann, H

Kim, K.- H., Lee, K. -H., Ann, H. B. 2006, JKAS, 39, 57

2006
[118]

T., 2010, , 721, 72

Kim,S., Rey, S.-C., Lisker, T., Sohn, S. T., 2010, , 721, 72

2010
[119]

Kim,S., , 2014, , 215, 22

2014
[120]

Koppen, J., Jachym, P., Taylor, R., Palou?, J., 2018, , 479, 436

2018
[121]

V., Gnedin, O

Kravtsov, A. V., Gnedin, O. Y., Klypin, A. A., 2004, , 609, 482

2004
[122]

Kormendy, J., & Bender, R., 2012, , 198, 2

2012
[123]

G., Yuk, I.-S., Park, H

Lee, M. G., Yuk, I.-S., Park, H. S., Harris, J., Zaritsky, D., 2009, , 703, 692

2009
[124]

Lisker, T., Glatt, K., Westera, P., Grebel, Eva K., 2006, , 132, 2432

2006
[125]

K., Binggeli, B., Glatt, K., 2007, , 660, 1186

Lisker, T., Grebel, E. K., Binggeli, B., Glatt, K., 2007, , 660, 1186

2007
[126]

Lisker, T., Fuchs, B., 2009, , 501, 429

2009
[127]

L., Ebrova, I., del Pino, A., & Semczuk, M

Lokas, E. L., Ebrova, I., del Pino, A., & Semczuk, M. 2014b, MNRAS, 445, L6
[128]

M., Miller, B

Lotz, J. M., Miller, B. W., Ferguson, H. C., 2004, , 613, 262

2004
[129]

Gladis , , 127, 16

Magris, C. Gladis , , 127, 16
[130]

I., Karachentsev, I., 2011, , 412, 2498

Makarov, D. I., Karachentsev, I., 2011, , 412, 2498

2011
[131]

I., Sharina, M

Makarov, D. I., Sharina, M. E., Karachentseva, V. E., Karachentseva, I. G., 2015, , 581, 82

2015
[132]

N., Makarov, D

Makarova, L. N., Makarov, D. I., Karachentsev, I. D., Tully, R. B., Rizzi, L., 2017, , 464, 2281

2017
[133]

Marcolini, A., D'Ercole, A., Brighenti, F., Recchi, S., 2006, , 371, 643

2006
[134]

Mayer, L., Governato, F., Colpi, M., Moore, B., Quinn, T., Wadsley, J., Stadel, J., Lake, G., 2001, , 547, L123

2001
[135]

Mayer, L., Governato, F., Colpi, M., Moore, B., Quinn, T., Wadsley, J., Stadel, J., Lake, G., 2001, , 559, 754

2001
[136]

Mentz, J. J. , 2016, , 463, 2819

2016
[137]

, 2022, , 164, 18

Michea, J. , 2022, , 164, 18

2022
[138]

, 2010, , 720, 1225

Monelli, M. , 2010, , 720, 1225

2010
[139]

, 2010, , 722, 1864

Monelli, M. , 2010, , 722, 1864

2010
[140]

W., , 144, 4

McConnachie, A. W., , 144, 4
[141]

Moore, B., Katz N., Lake, G., Dressler, A., Oemler, A., \ 1996, Nature, 379, 613

1996
[142]

Moore, B., Lake, G., Katz, N., 1998, , 495, 139

1998
[143]

, , 645, 92

Muller, O. , , 645, 92
[144]

Navabi, M., , 2021, , 910, 127

2021
[145]

F., Frenk, C

Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., White, S. D. M., 1997, ApJ, 490, 493

1997
[146]

Noeske, K. H. , 2007, , 660, L43

2007
[147]

Jr., 1974, , 194, 1

Oemler, A. Jr., 1974, , 194, 1

1974
[148]

Pak, M., Rey, S.-C., Lisker, T., Lee, ., Kim, S., Sung, E.-C.., Jerjen, H., Chung, J., 2014, MNRAS, 445, 630

2014
[149]

Pallottini, A., Ferrara, A., Gallerani, S., Salvadori, S., D'Odorico, V., 2014,2014, , 440, 2498

2014
[150]

Park, C., Gott III, R., Choi, Y.-Y., 2008, , 674, 784d

2008
[151]

H., 2014, , 796, L14

Paudel, S., Ree, C. H., 2014, , 796, L14

2014
[152]

Pedraz, S., Gorgas, J., Cardiel, N., Sanchez-Blazquez, P., Guzman, R., 2002, , 332, L59

2002
[153]

Peebles, P. J. E., 1979, , 84, 730

1979
[154]

Peletier, R. F. 1993, , 271, 51

1993
[155]

Y., Ho, L

Peng, C. Y., Ho, L. C., Impey, C. D., Rix, H. -W., 2010, , 139, 2097

2010
[156]

J.,Forbes, D

Penny, S. J.,Forbes, D. A., Pimbblet, K. A., Floyd, D. J. E., 2014, , 443, 3381

2014
[157]

J., Masters, K

Penny, S. J., Masters, K. L., Weijmans, A.-M., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 462, 3955

2016
[158]

, 2023, , 521, 129

Pérez-Millán, D. , 2023, , 521, 129

2023
[159]

2013, MNRAS, 433, 1505

del Pino, Andrés, . 2013, MNRAS, 433, 1505

2013
[160]

Rey, S.-C.., Kim, S., Chung, J., Lee, Y., 2023, , 945, 140

2023
[161]

S., Terndrup, D

Reyden, B. S., Terndrup, D. M., Pogge, R.W., Lauer, T. R. 1999, , 517, 650

1999
[162]

2021, , tmp9,

Riffel, R. . 2021, , tmp9,

2021
[163]

, 2011, , 739, L49

Rodighiero, G. , 2011, , 739, L49

2011
[164]

K., Cooper, M

Rodriguez Wimberly, M. K., Cooper, M. C., Fillingham, S. P., Boylan-Kolchin, M., Bullock, J. S., Garrison-Kimmel, S, 2019, , 483, 403

2019
[165]

, 2023, , 522, 130

Romero-Gómez, J. , 2023, , 522, 130

2023
[166]

, 2024a, , 527, 9715

Romero-Gómez, J. , 2024a, , 527, 9715
[167]

, 2024b, , 689, 40

Romero-Gómez, J. , 2024b, , 689, 40
[168]

Rusakov, V., , 2021, , 502, 6

2021
[169]

, 2007, , 173, 267

Salim, S. , 2007, , 173, 267

2007
[170]

, 2012, , 420, 20

Salucci, P. , 2012, , 420, 20

2012
[171]

S\' a nchcez-BL\' a zquez, P., , 2009, , 499, 47

2009
[172]

Sandage, A., Bibggeli, B., 1984, , 89, 919

1984
[173]

A., , 2016, , 829, 863

Santana, F. A., , 2016, , 829, 863

2016
[174]

2015, , 583, 126

Savino, A., Salaris, M., Tolstoy, E. 2015, , 583, 126

2015
[175]

Savino, A., Tolstoy, E., Salaris, M., Monelli, M., de Boer, T. J. L., 2019, , 630, 116

2019
[176]

Salvadori, S., Ferrara, A., Schneider, R., 2008, , 386, 348

2008
[177]

B., 2022,

Seo, M., Ann, H. B., 2022, . 514, 5853

2022
[178]

B., 2023, , 520, 5521

Seo, M., Ann, H. B., 2023, , 520, 5521

2023
[179]

L., 1968, Atlas de Galaxias Australes (Cordoba: Observatorio Astronomico)

S\' e rsic, J. L., 1968, Atlas de Galaxias Australes (Cordoba: Observatorio Astronomico)

1968
[180]

P., Davis, M

Schlegel, D., Finkbeiner, D. P., Davis, M. 1998, , 500, 525

1998
[181]

Seo, Mira, Ann, H. B. 2023, , 520, 5521

2023
[182]

R., Iliev, I

Shapiro, P. R., Iliev, I. T., Raga, A. C., 2004, , 348, 753

2004
[183]

Simien, F., & Prugniel, P., 2002, A&A, 384, 371

2002
[184]

D., , 2017, , 837, 102

Skillman E. D., , 2017, , 837, 102

2017
[185]

N., Small, I., Mobasher, B., Stott, J., Nisbet, D., 2014, , 437, 3516

Sobral, D., Best, P. N., Small, I., Mobasher, B., Stott, J., Nisbet, D., 2014, , 437, 3516

2014
[186]

Smith, R., Fellhauer, M., Assmann, P., 2012, , 420, 1990

2012
[187]

S., Steinhardt, C

Speagle, J. S., Steinhardt, C. I., Capak, P. L., Silverman, J. D., 2014, , 437, 3516

2014
[188]

Spitzer L., Jr., Baade W., 1951, ApJ, 113, 413

1951
[189]

Strateva, I., , 2001, , 122, 1861

2001
[190]

Steyrleithner, P., Hensler, G., Boselli, A., 2020, , 494, 1114

2020
[191]

Y., Kravtsov, A

Tassis, K., Gnedin, N. Y., Kravtsov, A. V., 2012, , 745, 68

2012
[192]

2015, ApJ, 799, 172

Toloba, E., Guhathakurta, P., Boselli, A., et al. 2015, ApJ, 799, 172

2015
[193]

Tolstoy, E., Hill, V., Tosi, M., 2009, ARA&A, 47, 371

2009
[194]

Tosi, M., 2003, Astrophysics and Space Science, 284, 65

2003
[195]

B., Trentham, N., 2008, , 135, 1488 Tosi, M., 2003, Astrophysics and Space Science, 284, 65

Tully, R. B., Trentham, N., 2008, , 135, 1488 Tosi, M., 2003, Astrophysics and Space Science, 284, 65

2008
[196]

, 2017, , 606, 135

Urich, L. , 2017, , 606, 135

2017
[197]

P., 1986, , 305, 889

Vader, J. P., 1986, , 305, 889

1986
[198]

van den Bergh, S., 1976, , 206, 883

1976
[199]

1994, , 428, 617

van den Bergh, S. 1994, , 428, 617

1994
[200]

D., Haynes, M

van Zee, L., Skillman, E. D., Haynes, M. P., 2004, , 128, 121

2004
[201]

P., 1984, , 139, L9

Vigroux, L., Souviron, J., Vader, J. P., 1984, , 139, L9

1984
[202]

P., Savage, B

Wakker, B. P., Savage, B. D., 2009, , 182, 378

2009
[203]

G., Mateo, M., Olszewski, E

Walker, M. G., Mateo, M., Olszewski, E. W., Penarruria, J., Evans, N. W., Gilmore, G. 2009, 704, 127

2009
[204]

Wang, B., 2022, , 516, 429

2022
[205]

Websterm D., Frebel, A., Bland-Hawthorn, J., 2016, , 818, 80

2016
[206]

R., 2011, , 739, 5

Weisz, D. R., 2011, , 739, 5

2011
[207]

R., Dolphin, A

Weisz, D. R., Dolphin, A. E., Skillman, E. D., Holtzman, J., Gilbert, K. M., Dalcanton, J. J., Williams, B. F., 2014, , 789, 147

2014
[208]

R., Dolphin, A

Weisz, D. R., Dolphin, A. E., Skillman, E. D., Holtzman, J., Gilbert, K. M., Dalcanton, J. J., Williams, B. F., 2015, , 804, 136

2015
[209]

R., , 2019, , 885, L8

Weisz, D. R., , 2019, , 885, L8

2019
[210]

B., Bullock, J

Wheeler, C., Pace, A. B., Bullock, J. S. . 2017, , 465, 24207

2017
[211]

H., Turk, M

Wise, J. H., Turk, M. J., Norman, M. L., Abel, T., 2012, ApJ, 745, 50

2012
[212]

M., Prochaska, J

Wolfe, A. M., Prochaska, J. X., 1998, ApJ, 494, L15

1998
[213]

C., Brooks, A

Wright, A. C., Brooks, A. M., Weisz, D. R., Christensen, C. R., 2019, , 482, 1176

2019
[214]

G., et al

York, D. G., et al. 2000, AJ, 120, 1579

2000
[215]

J., Li, C., Boquien, M., Rossi, G., 2020, , 497,47

Zhou, S., Mo, H. J., Li, C., Boquien, M., Rossi, G., 2020, , 497,47

2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

G., Moore, B., Bower, R

Abadi, M. G., Moore, B., Bower, R. G., 1999, MNRAS, 308, 947

1999

[2] [2]

Aguerri, J. A. L., Iglesias-Páramo, J., Vílchez, J. M., Muñoz-Tuñón, C., Sánchez-Janssen, R. , 130, 475

[3] [3]

B., 2014, , 47, 1

Ann H. B., 2014, , 47, 1

2014

[4] [4]

B., Seo, M., Ha, D

Ann, H. B., Seo, M., Ha, D. K., 2015, , 217, 27

2015

[5] [5]

B., 2017, , 50,111

Ann, H. B., 2017, , 50,111

2017

[6] [6]

B., Seo, M

Ann, H. B., Seo, M. 2024, MNRAS, 530, 210

2024

[7] [7]

Aparicio, A., Carrera, R., Martínez-Delgado, D., 2001, , 122, 2524

2001

[8] [8]

V., , 2007, , 381, 263

Asari, N. V., , 2007, , 381, 263

2007