Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 40 references

Surface scattering of atoms for high-sensitivity spectroscopy

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single scattering event from a polydimethylsiloxane-coated surface can cool iron atoms from roughly 1400 K to room temperature, and the same surface scatters ytterbium atoms with negligible adsorption down to about 200 K.

desk verdict Useful new measurements of Fe and Yb scattering on PDMS show real cooling, but the single-bounce claim outruns the evidence. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.09951 v1 pith:DE4KDBIS submitted 2025-07-14 physics.atom-ph physics.app-phphysics.ins-detphysics.optics

V. J. Ajith , Aaron Barr , Mark Raizen This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-phphysics.app-phphysics.ins-detphysics.optics PACS 34.50.-s32.70.Jz
keywords atom-surfacescatteringpolydimethylsiloxane(PDMS)thermalaccommodationDopplerbroadeninglaserspectroscopyironatomsytterbiumcoldatomsource
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports experimental evidence that a single bounce off a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)-coated surface cools iron atoms from roughly 1400 K to the surface temperature, measured at 285 ± 22 K against a 293 K surface. It also finds that ytterbium atoms scatter from PDMS with very low adsorption even when the substrate is chilled to about 200 K. The authors argue that one adsorption–desorption event is enough for an atom to equilibrate thermally with the polymer, and they use a numerical simulation to show that such a surface could serve as a room-temperature, collimated atom source with roughly 50% more flux through a slit than the slit alone at the same Doppler width. The payoff, if the claims hold, is a simple way to reduce Doppler broadening and increase transit time in high-sensitivity laser spectroscopy without sacrificing atomic flux.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the spin-coated, cured PDMS surface (a roughly 1 µm film of Dow Sylgard 184), which combines two properties: a low sticking probability of order $10^{-5}$ (consistent with rubidium measurements on PDMS) so that nearly all incident atoms return to the vacuum, and rapid thermal accommodation so that the returning atoms leave at the surface temperature. The argument's operative event is a single adsorption–desorption cycle; the authors infer this because the collimated beam interacts with the surface only once and the observed fluorescence comes from straight-line paths, with no build-up of atoms in the chamber.

What would settle it

Measure the full velocity distribution of the scattered atoms, for example by isotope-resolved Doppler spectroscopy or time-of-flight detection: if the scattered-iron spectrum shows a non-thermal component at velocities corresponding to 1400 K rather than a single distribution at about 293 K, the single-scattering equilibration claim fails. Alternatively, a quartz-crystal microbalance at 200 K should show measurable ytterbium adsorption; if instead no adsorption is observed at 150 K, the claimed low-temperature cutoff would need revision.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that a thin cured PDMS film acts as a thermalizing, nearly non-sticking surface: hot atoms impinging on it desorb at the surface temperature after a single scattering event. For iron, the measured temperature of the scattered atoms is 285 ± 22 K (mean ± standard deviation over 44 spectra), indistinguishable from the laboratory-temperature substrate at 293 K and a factor of about five below the 1418 ± 130 K estimated for the incoming beam. For ytterbium, fluorescence backgrounds show that scattering persists with roughly constant yield as the substrate is cooled from 290 K to about 200 K, then drops sharply below 190 K, which the authors attribute to embrittlement of PDMS.

Load-bearing premise

The scattered-atom temperature is inferred by fitting one Voigt profile to a broad fluorescence background that actually contains Doppler-broadened contributions from several iron isotopes with different isotope shifts, so the temperature estimate presumes the scattered atoms form a single thermal Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution that one Voigt can represent.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single scattering event can cut an atom's most probable velocity roughly in half (758 m/s at 1970 K oven to about 298 m/s at 298 K), doubling the transit time across an excitation laser and increasing the number of excitation–emission cycles per atom.
  • Because the surface preserves flux while cooling, Doppler broadening can be reduced without the flux loss that slit collimation alone would cause.
  • The simulated geometry places the slit out of line-of-sight of the ablation point and still delivers about 5.2% of the original flux at 50 MHz Doppler width, a roughly 50% improvement over a slit alone at the same width, but at room temperature rather than 1400 K.
  • PDMS-coated surfaces remain effective scattering agents for ytterbium down to roughly 200 K, which extends the useful range of this cooling approach toward cryogenic operation.
  • The 'non-stick' property means a coated surface can be placed in an atom beam for extended periods without accumulating a coating that would spoil the surface (no visible ytterbium coating after 200 minutes, versus 162 nm on a bare crystal in 100 minutes).

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If single-scattering thermal accommodation is generic, then anti-relaxation-coated vapor cells—where atoms undergo many wall collisions—likely contain atoms already at the wall temperature; this could simplify models of spin relaxation and transit-time broadening in such cells.
  • The same mechanism may extend to other refractory elements with high oven temperatures, since the cooling is purely mechanical and does not depend on the atom's internal level structure.
  • Tetracontane coatings, which scatter rubidium at temperatures down to 123 K, are a natural testbed for pushing surface-scattering cooling below the 200 K limit observed here for PDMS.
  • A direct test of the single-scattering claim would be to compare the temperature of atoms scattered once versus atoms that have undergone multiple bounces; the paper's geometry isolates a single bounce, but a two-surface 'corner' reflector could test whether additional collisions perturb the distribution.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports that a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)-coated surface scatters hot iron atoms (from laser ablation, initially ~1400 K) and ytterbium atoms (from an effusion oven) and that the scattered atoms appear thermally equilibrated to roughly room temperature (mean 285 K for iron, against a 293 K surface). The authors also report that ytterbium scattering persists down to substrate temperatures near 200 K, that a quartz crystal microbalance shows negligible net ytterbium deposition on PDMS, and that a numerical simulation of a scattering-based atom source can provide collimated flux with reduced velocity and modest flux enhancement compared with a slit alone.

Significance. If the observations hold, the work offers a simple, general method to reduce Doppler broadening and increase transit time in atomic-beam spectroscopy, potentially serving as a first cooling stage for high-temperature atoms. The non-stick property of PDMS for ytterbium down to ~200 K is notable and extends prior work on anti-relaxation coatings. The numerical simulation is a useful proof-of-principle, and the experimental data are direct measurements with a clear spectroscopic approach. However, the strength of the central claims currently exceeds the evidence in three respects: the single-scattering inference, the iron adsorption claim, and the unquantified systematic uncertainty in the Voigt temperature extraction. These issues are addressable by rephrasing or by additional analysis/measurements.

major comments (3)
  1. [III A, Abstract] The claim that 'a single scattering event is enough for atoms to equilibrate with the PDMS surface temperature' is not supported by the time-integrated fluorescence data. The lock-in detected spectrum measures steady-state fluorescence, so a thermal velocity distribution could result from direct inelastic scattering, from adsorption-desorption with a finite dwell time, or from multiple surface collisions before detection. The argument that 'there is no build-up' rules out a persistent trapped vapor but does not exclude trapping-desorption or multi-bounce trajectories. Since the single-event statement is a headline claim, the authors should either add time-resolved or velocity-selective evidence, or rephrase to state that atoms equilibrate to the surface temperature after scattering without specifying the number of events.
  2. [III A, Figs. 6 and 7] The temperature of scattered iron atoms is extracted by fitting a single Voigt profile to the background, but the background is a Doppler-broadened superposition of at least four iron isotopes (54Fe, 56Fe, 57Fe, 58Fe), with hyperfine structure for 57Fe. The systematic bias in the fitted Gaussian width from this simplification is not quantified. The reported 285 ± 22 K is the spread over 44 fits, not the total uncertainty. The authors should fit a sum of Voigt functions with known isotope shifts and abundances, or otherwise estimate the model bias, to support the stated temperature and its uncertainty.
  3. [Abstract, III B] The claim that PDMS shows 'very low adsorption of iron and ytterbium atoms' is only directly measured for ytterbium via the quartz crystal monitor. For iron, the fluorescence data show that a scattered signal exists, but they do not quantify the sticking probability. The abstract and conclusions should restrict the low-adsorption claim to ytterbium unless an iron adsorption measurement is provided.
minor comments (5)
  1. [III A] "Uncertainity" should be "Uncertainty", and the Fig. 6 caption contains "scatted atoms" instead of "scattered atoms".
  2. [II B] "15 0 from the normal" should read "15° from the normal".
  3. [II D] The simulation parameters (surface height, tilt, slit width) are described as chosen for ease of comparison, but the sensitivity of the flux enhancement to these parameters is not discussed; a brief parameter study would strengthen the proof-of-principle claim.
  4. [III C, Fig. 9] The text says the background intensity maxima are marked with dashed blue lines, but the bottom row shows green triangles and a red dot-dash reference line; the caption and text should be made consistent.
  5. [Fig. 2] The Grotrian diagram labels a 501.2 nm transition for iron, but the text only uses the 372 nm transition; please verify whether the additional labels are intended.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the temperatures are measured directly and the simulation explicitly assumes thermalization rather than deriving it.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain contains no step in which an output is equivalent to an input by construction. Scattered-atom temperatures (Section III A) are extracted by fitting Voigt profiles to fluorescence backgrounds; the fitted width is compared with the independently known surface temperature, so the reported 285 K is a measurement rather than a parameter recycled into the claim. The numerical source design (Section II D) explicitly states that atoms 'are further assumed to thermally equilibrate with the surface, and scatter at room temperature'; because the simulation adopts, rather than purports to prove, the thermalization result, its flux and Doppler-width outputs are a design calculation and not a disguised prediction of the same physics. The single-scattering inference ('The experiments suggest that the temperature equilibration occurs through a single scattering event...') is geometrically motivated and is not an equation whose conclusion is embedded in its premise; if steady-state fluorescence cannot distinguish single-bounce from trapping-desorption or multi-bounce histories, that is an evidence limitation, not circularity. The only near-self citation, Ref. [39] for the Yb oven, is not load-bearing. The paper also candidly notes that Yb temperature could not be fitted with a single Voigt, using background intensity instead. No self-definitional, fitted-input-as-prediction, imported-uniqueness, ansatz-by-citation, or renaming pattern is present. Hence no circularity is found.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central experimental claims are measurements, so the ledger is light. The only hand-chosen inputs are the simulation geometry and the spectral fitting parameters. No new physical entities are introduced, and the simulation's thermalization input comes from the same experiment, making the source simulation a projection rather than a test.

free parameters (2)
  • Voigt Gaussian width for scattered-atom background = 285 K equivalent (mean over 44 fits, std dev 22 K)
    Fitted to the fluorescence spectra to estimate the temperature of atoms scattered from PDMS; this is the measurement basis for the central cooling claim, not an ad hoc parameter.
  • Simulation geometry parameters (surface height, tilt, slit width) = 4 mm above ablation point, 45 degrees tilt, 1.2 mm slit width
    Chosen by hand for the proof-of-principle source simulation; the claimed 50% flux enhancement depends on these values and is not optimized or experimentally validated.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Atoms in the collimated beam have a Maxwell-Boltzmann velocity distribution at a single temperature.
    Used to convert the measured Voigt FWHM into a temperature; standard for thermal beams, but for ablation-generated beams the distribution may not be perfectly thermal.
  • domain assumption Ablation flux follows a cosine angular distribution relative to the surface normal.
    Assumed in the source simulation (Section II D); standard for effusive sources, but not independently verified for laser ablation of iron oxide powder.
  • domain assumption Scattered atoms thermally equilibrate with the PDMS surface before leaving.
    Adopted from the experimental thermalization result and used as an input to the simulation; the simulation's output is a consequence of this assumption, so it should not be read as independent confirmation.
  • domain assumption Each point on the scattering surface acts as an independent diffuse point source.
    Implicit in the simulation's treatment of the surface as a grid of cosine sources (Section II D).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Surface scattering of atoms for high-sensitivity spectroscopy." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DE4KDBIS

@misc{pith2026250709951,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Surface scattering of atoms for high-sensitivity spectroscopy},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DE4KDBIS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.09951}
}
read the original abstract

High-sensitivity laser spectroscopy is integral to applications like atomic clocks, quantum computers, and chemical sensing. Lowering atomic temperature decreases spectral Doppler broadening and increases transit time across the excitation laser. We find that a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) coated surface can cool iron atoms from ~1400 K to room temperature by surface scattering. It is also apparent that a single scattering event is enough for atoms to equilibrate with the PDMS surface temperature. Further, we show the very low adsorption of iron and ytterbium atoms on PDMS, an effect that persists to surface temperatures of 200 K. Through numerical simulation, we demonstrate the potential use of surface scattering in making a room temperature source of collimated atoms with enhanced flux and reduced velocity compared to that without surface scattering.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.09951 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic figure of the experimental setup. Figures ’a’ and ’b’ show schematics of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Grotrian diagram for 372 nm transition of atomic iron and 399 nm transition of atomic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Fluorescence spectra of collimated iron (figure ’a’) and ytterbium atoms (figure ’b’) for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a): Laser ablation and collimation by a slit. (b): Laser ablation followed by scattering [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The temperature of the incident iron atoms is estimated by fitting a Voigt profile to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Fluorescence spectrum when the excitation laser is aligned very close to a PDMS coated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Histogram of the estimated temperatures from 44 independent spectra of scattered atoms [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Thickness monitor crystals (gold coated quartz) exposed to Yb atom beam. (a) Exposed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Top row shows ytterbium fluorescence spectra for 399 nm transition when the excitation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Demtr¨ oder, Applications of Laser Spectroscopy, in Laser Spectroscopy 2: Experimental Techniques (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2015) pp

    W. Demtr¨ oder, Applications of Laser Spectroscopy, in Laser Spectroscopy 2: Experimental Techniques (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2015) pp. 589–650

    work page 2015

  2. [2]

    A. D. Ludlow, M. M. Boyd, J. Ye, E. Peik, and P. Schmidt, Optical atomic clocks, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 637 (2015)

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    Derevianko and H

    A. Derevianko and H. Katori, Colloquium: Physics of optical lattice clocks, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 331 (2011)

    2011

  4. [4]

    T. D. Ladd, F. Jelezko, R. Laflamme, Y. Nakamura, C. Monroe, and J. L. O’Brien, Quantum computers, Nature 464, 45 (2010). 16

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    Walker and P

    T. Walker and P. Feng, Measurements of Collisions Between Laser-Cooled Atoms, inAdvances In Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, Vol. 34, edited by B. Bederson and H. Walther (Academic Press, 1994) pp. 125–170

    work page 1994

  6. [6]

    P. R. Berman, Study of Collisions by Laser Spectroscopy, inAdvances in Atomic and Molecular Physics, Vol. 13, edited by D. R. Bates and B. Bederson (Academic Press, 1978) pp. 57–112

    work page 1978

  7. [7]

    R. G. Brewer, Study of atom—wall collisions by optical pumping, The Journal of Chemical Physics 38, 3015 (1963)

    work page 1963

  8. [8]

    Kerstel and L

    E. Kerstel and L. Gianfrani, Advances in laser-based isotope ratio measurements: selected applications, Appl. Phys. B 92, 439 (2008)

    work page 2008

Show all 40 references
  1. [9]

    R. S. Harmon, F. C. DeLucia, C. E. McManus, N. J. McMillan, T. F. Jenkins, M. E. Walsh, and A. Miziolek, Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy – An emerging chemical sensor technol- ogy for real-time field-portable, geochemical, mineralogical, and environmental applications, Ap...

    2006

  2. [10]

    DeLucia, A

    F. DeLucia, A. Samuels, R. Harmon, R. Walters, K. McNesby, A. LaPointe, R. Winkel, and A. Miziolek, Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS): a promising versatile chemical sensor technology for hazardous material detection, IEEE Sensors Journal 5, 681 (2005)

    2005

  3. [11]

    Wysocki and D

    G. Wysocki and D. Weidmann, Molecular dispersion spectroscopy for chemical sensing using chirped mid-infrared quantum cascade laser, Opt. Express, OE 18, 26123 (2010)

    2010

  4. [12]

    N. Huet, M. Pettens, and T. Bastin, Isotope shifts and hyperfine structure of the laser-cooling Fe I 358-nm line, Phys. Rev. A 92, 052507 (2015)

    2015

  5. [13]

    W. D. Phillips, Nobel Lecture: Laser cooling and trapping of neutral atoms, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 721 (1998)

    1998

  6. [14]

    Degen, F

    C. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro, Quantum sensing, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 035002 (2017)

    2017

  7. [15]

    M. H. Anderson, J. R. Ensher, M. R. Matthews, C. E. Wieman, and E. A. Cornell, Observation of Bose-Einstein Condensation in a Dilute Atomic Vapor, Science 269, 198 (1995)

    1995

  8. [16]

    J. V. Prodan and W. D. Phillips, Chirping the light—fantastic? Recent NBS atom cooling experiments, Progress in Quantum Electronics 8, 231 (1984)

    1984

  9. [17]

    N. R. Hutzler, H.-I. Lu, and J. M. Doyle, The Buffer Gas Beam: An Intense, Cold, and Slow Source for Atoms and Molecules, Chem. Rev. 112, 4803 (2012). 17

    2012

  10. [18]

    O. Kock, W. He, D. ´Swierad, L. Smith, J. Hughes, K. Bongs, and Y. Singh, Laser controlled atom source for optical clocks, Scientific reports 6, 37321 (2016)

    2016

  11. [19]

    Yasuda, T

    M. Yasuda, T. Tanabe, T. Kobayashi, D. Akamatsu, T. Sato, and A. Hatakeyama, Laser- controlled cold ytterbium atom source for transportable optical clocks, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 86, 125001 (2017)

    2017

  12. [20]

    Stephens, R

    M. Stephens, R. Rhodes, and C. Wieman, Study of wall coatings for vapor-cell laser traps, Journal of Applied Physics 76, 3479 (1994)

    1994

  13. [21]

    H. M. Goldenberg, D. Kleppner, and N. F. Ramsey, Atomic Beam Resonance Experiments with Stored Beams, Phys. Rev. 123, 530 (1961)

    1961

  14. [22]

    Rahman and H

    C. Rahman and H. Robinson, Rb oo hyperfine transition in evacuated wall-coated cell at melting temperature, IEEE journal of quantum electronics 23, 452 (1987)

    1987

  15. [23]

    Y. Yi, H. Robinson, S. Knappe, J. Maclennan, C. Jones, C. Zhu, N. Clark, and J. Kitching, Method for characterizing self-assembled monolayers as antirelaxation wall coatings for alkali vapor cells, Journal of Applied Physics 104 (2008)

    2008

  16. [24]

    H. Chi, W. Quan, J. Zhang, L. Zhao, and J. Fang, Advances in anti-relaxation coatings of alkali-metal vapor cells, Applied Surface Science 501, 143897 (2020)

    2020

  17. [25]

    Sekiguchi, A

    N. Sekiguchi, A. Hatakeyama, K. Okuma, and H. Usui, Scattering of an alkali-metal atomic beam on anti-spin-relaxation coatings, Phys. Rev. A 98, 042709 (2018)

    2018

  18. [26]

    Wu, Wall interactions of spin-polarized atoms, Rev

    Z. Wu, Wall interactions of spin-polarized atoms, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 035006 (2021)

    2021

  19. [27]

    Liberman and R

    V. Liberman and R. Knize, Relaxation of optically pumped cs in wall-coated cells, Physical Review A 34, 5115 (1986)

    1986

  20. [28]

    Budker, L

    D. Budker, L. Hollberg, D. F. Kimball, J. Kitching, S. Pustelny, and V. V. Yashchuk, Mi- crowave transitions and nonlinear magneto-optical rotation in anti-relaxation-coated cells, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics 71, 012903 (2005)

    2005

  21. [29]

    S. N. Atutov and A. I. Plekhanov, Accurate measurement of the sticking time and sticking probability of Rb atoms on a polydimethylsiloxane coating, J. Exp. Theor. Phys.120, 1 (2015)

    2015

  22. [30]

    M. A. Bouchiat and J. Brossel, Relaxation of Optically Pumped Rb Atoms on Paraffin-Coated Walls, Phys. Rev. 147, 41 (1966)

    1966

  23. [31]

    K. F. Zhao, M. Schaden, and Z. Wu, Method for Measuring the Dwell Time of Spin-Polarized Rb Atoms on Coated Pyrex Glass Surfaces Using Light Shift, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 073201 (2009). 18

    2009

  24. [32]

    Ulanski and Z

    E. Ulanski and Z. Wu, Measurement of dwell times of spin polarized rubidium atoms on octadecyltrichlorosilane- and paraffin-coated surfaces, Applied Physics Letters 98, 201115 (2011)

    2011

  25. [33]

    Gozzini, F

    A. Gozzini, F. Mango, J. H. Xu, G. Alzetta, F. Maccarrone, and R. A. Bernheim, Light- induced ejection of alkali atoms in polysiloxane coated cells, Il Nuovo Cimento D 15, 709 (1993)

    1993

  26. [34]

    S. N. Atutov, V. Biancalana, P. Bicchi, C. Marinelli, E. Mariotti, M. Meucci, A. Nagel, K. A. Nasyrov, S. Rachini, and L. Moi, Light-induced diffusion and desorption of alkali metals in a siloxane film: Theory and experiment, Phys. Rev. A 60, 4693 (1999)

    1999

  27. [35]

    Asakawa, Y

    K. Asakawa, Y. Tanaka, K. Uemura, N. Matsuzaka, K. Nishikawa, Y. Oguma, H. Usui, and A. Hatakeyama, Measurement of the temperature dependence of dwell time and spin relaxation probability of Rb atoms on paraffin surfaces using a beam-scattering method, Phys. Rev. A 104, 063106 (2021)

    2021

  28. [36]

    S 1) and more details of the numerical simulation showing the flux enchancement

    See supplemental material at [URL will be inserted by publisher] for an optical image of the spin-coated PDMS surface(Fig. S 1) and more details of the numerical simulation showing the flux enchancement

  29. [37]

    D. B. Hall, P. Underhill, and J. M. Torkelson, Spin coating of thin and ultrathin polymer films, Polymer Engineering & Science 38, 2039 (1998)

    1998

  30. [38]

    Braˇ ciˇ c, T

    M. Braˇ ciˇ c, T. Mohan, R. Kargl, T. Griesser, S. Hribernik, S. K¨ ostler, K. Stana-Kleinschek, and L. Fras-Zemljiˇ c, Preparation of PDMS ultrathin films and patterned surface modification with cellulose, RSC Advances 4, 11955 (2014)

    2014

  31. [39]

    Bucay, Surface Ionization of Metastable Calcium and Ytterbium Atoms, Ph.D., The Uni- versity of Texas at Austin, United States – Texas (2019), iSBN: 9798684608384

    I. Bucay, Surface Ionization of Metastable Calcium and Ytterbium Atoms, Ph.D., The Uni- versity of Texas at Austin, United States – Texas (2019), iSBN: 9798684608384

    2019

  32. [40]

    Zhang, Y

    G. Zhang, Y. Sun, B. Qian, H. Gao, and D. Zuo, Experimental study on mechanical perfor- mance of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) at various temperatures, Polymer Testing 90, 106670 (2020). 19

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.