Dunkl paraproducts and fractional Leibniz rules for the Dunkl Laplacian

Suman Mukherjee; The Anh Bui

arxiv: 2507.10042 · v2 · submitted 2025-07-14 · 🧮 math.FA · math.AP

Dunkl paraproducts and fractional Leibniz rules for the Dunkl Laplacian

The Anh Bui , Suman Mukherjee This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 05:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.FA math.AP

keywords Dunkl Laplacianfractional Leibniz rulesparaproductsDunkl transformalmost orthogonalityLebesgue spacesmultiplicity function

0 comments

The pith

Fractional Leibniz rules for the Dunkl Laplacian hold via adapted paraproducts.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes fractional Leibniz inequalities for the Dunkl Laplacian, showing that the L^p norm of (-Δ_k)^s applied to a product fg is controlled by terms involving (-Δ_k)^s f times g and f times (-Δ_k)^s g, with appropriate exponents. This is achieved by transferring the classical paraproduct decomposition, pointwise decay estimates, and almost-orthogonality estimates into the Dunkl setting with its reflection-invariant measure. A sympathetic reader would care because these rules extend product estimates from standard harmonic analysis to a broader class of operators and weights that arise in representation theory and reflection groups.

Core claim

The authors prove that for the Dunkl Laplacian Δ_k, the fractional Leibniz rule holds in the form ||(-Δ_k)^s (fg)||_{L^p(dμ_k)} ≲ ||(-Δ_k)^s f||_{L^{p1}(dμ_k)} ||g||_{L^{p2}(dμ_k)} + ||f||_{L^{p1}(dμ_k)} ||(-Δ_k)^s g||_{L^{p2}(dμ_k)}, by developing Dunkl paraproduct operators, establishing pointwise decay for (-Δ_k)^s f on Schwartz functions, and proving adapted almost-orthogonality and boundedness results on Lebesgue spaces with the Dunkl measure.

What carries the argument

Dunkl paraproduct operators obtained by adapting the classical paraproduct decomposition to the Dunkl framework, which decompose the product and control the fractional operator via almost-orthogonality.

Load-bearing premise

The classical paraproduct decomposition and almost-orthogonality estimates adapt to the Dunkl setting without further restrictions on the multiplicity function beyond those making the Dunkl measure well-defined.

What would settle it

A pair of Schwartz functions f and g for which the inequality fails to hold for some s in (0,1) and admissible p, p1, p2 when the multiplicity function k is chosen inside the standard range.

read the original abstract

We establish fractional Leibniz rules for the Dunkl Laplacian $\Delta_k$ of the form $$\|(-\Delta_k)^s(fg)\|_{L^p(d\mu_k)} \lesssim \|(-\Delta_k)^s f\|_{L^{p_1}(d\mu_k)} \|g\|_{L^{p_2}(d\mu_k)} + \|f\|_{L^{p_1}(d\mu_k)} \|(-\Delta_k)^s g\|_{L^{p_2}(d\mu_k)}.$$ Our approach relies on adapting the classical paraproduct decomposition to the Dunkl setting. In the process, we develop several new auxiliary results. Specifically, we show that for a Schwartz function $f$, the function $(-\Delta_k)^s f$ satisfies a pointwise decay estimate; we establish a version of almost orthogonality estimates adapted to the Dunkl framework; and we investigate the boundedness of Dunkl paraproduct operators on the Lebesgue spaces.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper adapts paraproducts to get a fractional Leibniz rule for the Dunkl Laplacian, with the new decay and almost-orthogonality estimates as the concrete additions.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that the authors have carried the classical paraproduct approach over to the Dunkl Laplacian and obtained the expected fractional Leibniz inequality along with some supporting estimates that look new in this setting. They prove a pointwise decay bound for (–Δ_k)^s f on Schwartz functions, set up Dunkl-adapted almost-orthogonality, and establish boundedness of the resulting paraproduct operators on the L^p spaces with measure dμ_k. These pieces let them reach the stated product estimate without obvious breakdowns in the argument structure. The work is organized and follows the standard decomposition lines, which is the part that comes across as competent and useful for anyone already inside Dunkl harmonic analysis. The auxiliary results on decay and almost orthogonality are the parts that actually add something not already in the cited literature. On the soft spots, the uniformity in the multiplicity function k is worth a close look. The stress-test note correctly flags that kernels tied to the Dunkl transform and reflection-group action can pick up factors that grow with k or its variation. The abstract presents the result for general admissible k, so the paper must either absorb those factors uniformly or work under conditions that keep the constants controlled. If the latter, an explicit statement would strengthen the claim. Otherwise the range of the inequality could be narrower than stated. This is a technical paper aimed at specialists who already use Dunkl operators or need product estimates in reflection-group settings. A reader working on multipliers, fractional integrals, or related inequalities in this framework will find the auxiliary machinery worth consulting. It is not a broad advance but the claims are specific enough to check. I would send it to peer review so the proofs and the k-dependence can be examined directly.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript establishes fractional Leibniz rules for the Dunkl Laplacian Δ_k in the form ||(-Δ_k)^s(fg)||_{L^p(dμ_k)} ≲ ||(-Δ_k)^s f||_{L^{p1}(dμ_k)} ||g||_{L^{p2}(dμ_k)} + ||f||_{L^{p1}(dμ_k)} ||(-Δ_k)^s g||_{L^{p2}(dμ_k)}. The proof adapts the classical paraproduct decomposition to the Dunkl setting, relying on three auxiliary results: a pointwise decay estimate for (-Δ_k)^s f when f is Schwartz, almost-orthogonality estimates for Dunkl paraproducts, and boundedness of the Dunkl paraproduct operators on L^p(dμ_k).

Significance. If the auxiliary estimates hold with constants independent of the multiplicity function k, the result would extend classical fractional Leibniz rules to the Dunkl framework in a uniform way. This could support further work on harmonic analysis and PDEs involving reflection groups. The development of Dunkl-adapted paraproducts and almost-orthogonality estimates is a technical step forward, though the k-uniformity must be verified explicitly for the claim to be fully secured.

major comments (1)

[Auxiliary results on almost-orthogonality estimates and Dunkl paraproduct boundedness] The almost-orthogonality estimates (developed as an auxiliary result and used to pass from the paraproduct decomposition to the target inequality) must be shown to produce constants independent of k. The pointwise decay estimate for (-Δ_k)^s f is stated for Schwartz functions, yet the overlap constants and decay rates in the Dunkl setting typically acquire factors depending on the values or variation of the multiplicity function k across the root system. Without an explicit k-uniformity argument, the boundedness of the Dunkl paraproducts on L^p(dμ_k) does not automatically yield the stated Leibniz rule for arbitrary admissible k.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract and introduction] The range of parameters s, p, p1, p2 for which the inequality holds should be stated explicitly in the abstract and introduction, together with any restrictions on the multiplicity function k.
[Preliminaries] Notation for the Dunkl measure dμ_k and the reflection group action should be introduced with a brief reminder of the standard assumptions on k to make the manuscript more self-contained.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive feedback. The concern about k-uniformity in the auxiliary estimates is important, and we address it directly below by clarifying the independence of constants and committing to an explicit verification in the revision.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The almost-orthogonality estimates (developed as an auxiliary result and used to pass from the paraproduct decomposition to the target inequality) must be shown to produce constants independent of k. The pointwise decay estimate for (-Δ_k)^s f is stated for Schwartz functions, yet the overlap constants and decay rates in the Dunkl setting typically acquire factors depending on the values or variation of the multiplicity function k across the root system. Without an explicit k-uniformity argument, the boundedness of the Dunkl paraproducts on L^p(dμ_k) does not automatically yield the stated Leibniz rule for arbitrary admissible k.

Authors: We appreciate the referee highlighting the need for explicit k-uniformity. In the proofs of the pointwise decay estimates for (-Δ_k)^s f on Schwartz functions, the decay rates follow from the properties of the Dunkl transform and the associated heat kernel bounds, which are uniform in k for admissible multiplicity functions and fixed s. The overlap constants in the almost-orthogonality estimates for Dunkl paraproducts arise from the reflection-invariant structure and do not introduce additional k-dependent factors beyond those already absorbed in the L^p(dμ_k) norms. The boundedness of the Dunkl paraproduct operators is established via maximal function arguments adapted to the Dunkl measure that likewise preserve uniformity in k. We will revise the manuscript to add a dedicated remark or subsection explicitly verifying and stating that all constants in the auxiliary results are independent of k, thereby confirming that the Leibniz rule holds for arbitrary admissible k. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation proceeds from newly developed auxiliary estimates

full rationale

The paper establishes the target fractional Leibniz rule for the Dunkl Laplacian by adapting the classical paraproduct decomposition and proving three new auxiliary results inside the manuscript: a pointwise decay estimate for (-Δ_k)^s f on Schwartz functions, almost-orthogonality estimates adapted to the Dunkl framework, and boundedness of the associated Dunkl paraproduct operators on L^p(dμ_k). These steps are constructed from the Dunkl transform, reflection-group action, and standard harmonic-analysis techniques rather than presupposing the final inequality or reducing to a self-citation chain. The central claim therefore remains independent of its inputs and is not forced by definition or prior fitted quantities.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract does not introduce new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; it relies on the standard definition of the Dunkl Laplacian and the Dunkl measure.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5694 in / 1172 out tokens · 27997 ms · 2026-05-19T05:19:10.588340+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We establish fractional Leibniz rules for the Dunkl Laplacian Δ_k of the form ∥(−Δ_k)^s(fg)∥_{L^p(dμ_k)} ≲ … using paraproduct decomposition Π[θ,ψ,ϕ] and almost-orthogonality estimates (Proposition 3.2).
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Dunkl operators T_ξ, Dunkl Laplacian Δ_k = ∑ T_j², Dunkl transform F_k defined via kernel E_k and measure dμ_k with multiplicity k.

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

[1]

Amri, J.-P

B. Amri, J.-P. Anker, and M. Sifi. Three results in Dunkl analysis.Colloq. Math., 118(1):299–312, 2010

work page 2010
[2]

Bényi, T

A. Bényi, T. Oh, and T. Zhao. Fractional Leibniz rule on the torus. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 153(1):207–221, 2025

work page 2025
[3]

Bourgain and D

J. Bourgain and D. Li. On an endpoint Kato-Ponce inequality.Differential Integral Equations, 27(11- 12):1037–1072, 2014

work page 2014
[4]

Brummer and V

J. Brummer and V. Naibo. Bilinear operators with homogeneous symbols, smooth molecules, and Kato-Ponce inequalities.Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 146(3):1217–1230, 2018

work page 2018
[5]

F. M. Christ and M. I. Weinstein. Dispersion of small amplitude solutions of the generalized Korteweg-de Vries equation.J. Funct. Anal., 100(1):87–109, 1991

work page 1991
[6]

R. R. Coifman and Y. Meyer. Nonlinear harmonic analysis, operator theory and P.D.E. InBei- jing lectures in harmonic analysis (Beijing, 1984), volume 112 ofAnn. of Math. Stud., pages 3–45. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 1986

work page 1984
[7]

Coulhon and X

T. Coulhon and X. T. Duong. Maximal regularity and kernel bounds: observations on a theorem by Hieber and Prüss.Adv. Diff. Equ., 5:343–368, 2000

work page 2000
[8]

Cruz-Uribe and V

D. Cruz-Uribe and V. Naibo. Kato-Ponce inequalities on weighted and variable Lebesgue spaces. Differential Integral Equations, 29(9-10):801–836, 2016

work page 2016
[9]

M. F. E. de Jeu. The Dunkl transform.Invent. Math., 113(1):147–162, 1993

work page 1993
[10]

Douglas and L

S. Douglas and L. Grafakos. Weighted Kato-Ponce inequalities for multiple factors.Math. Nachr., 297(10):3700–3722, 2024

work page 2024
[11]

C. F. Dunkl. Differential-difference operators associated to reflection groups.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 311(1):167–183, 1989

work page 1989
[12]

C. F. Dunkl. Integral kernels with reflection group invariance.Canad. J. Math., 43(6):1213–1227, 1991

work page 1991
[13]

C. F. Dunkl. Hankel transforms associated to finite reflection groups. InHypergeometric functions on domains of positivity, Jack polynomials, and applications, volume 138 ofContemp. Math., pages 123–138. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1992

work page 1992
[14]

Dziubański and A

J. Dziubański and A. Hejna. Hörmander’s multiplier theorem for the Dunkl transform.J. Funct. Anal., 277(7):2133–2159, 2019

work page 2019
[15]

Dziubański and A

J. Dziubański and A. Hejna. Remark on atomic decompositions for the Hardy spaceH 1 in the rational Dunkl setting.Studia Math., 251(1):89–110, 2020

work page 2020
[16]

Dziubański and A

J. Dziubański and A. Hejna. Remarks on Dunkl translations of non-radial kernels.J. Fourier Anal. Appl., 29(4):Paper No. 52, 35 pp., 2023

work page 2023
[17]

J. Fang, H. Li, and J. Zhao. The fractional Leibniz rules on the product space of Carnot groups. Banach J. Math. Anal., 19(2):Paper No. 17, 20 pp., 2025

work page 2025
[18]

Fujiwara, V

K. Fujiwara, V. Georgiev, and T. Ozawa. Higher order fractional Leibniz rule.J. Fourier Anal. Appl., 24(3):650–665, 2018

work page 2018
[19]

D. V. Gorbachev, V. I. Ivanov, and S. Y. Tikhonov. PositiveLp-bounded Dunkl-type generalized translation operator and its applications.Constr. Approx., 49(3):555–605, 2019

work page 2019
[20]

Grafakos.Modern Fourier analysis, volume 250 ofGraduate Texts in Mathematics

L. Grafakos.Modern Fourier analysis, volume 250 ofGraduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer, New York, third edition, 2014

work page 2014
[21]

Grafakos, D

L. Grafakos, D. Maldonado, and V. Naibo. A remark on an endpoint Kato-Ponce inequality.Differ- ential Integral Equations, 27(5-6):415–424, 2014

work page 2014
[22]

Grafakos and S

L. Grafakos and S. Oh. The Kato-Ponce inequality. Comm. Partial Differential Equations , 39(6):1128–1157, 2014. 26 THE ANH BUI AND SUMAN MUKHERJEE

work page 2014
[23]

Grafakos and R

L. Grafakos and R. H. Torres. Discrete decompositions for bilinear operators and almost diagonal conditions. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 354(3):1153–1176, 2002

work page 2002
[24]

Gulisashvili and M

A. Gulisashvili and M. A. Kon. Exact smoothing properties of Schrödinger semigroups.Amer. J. Math., 118(6):1215–1248, 1996

work page 1996
[25]

Hale and V

E. Hale and V. Naibo. Fractional Leibniz rules in the setting of quasi-Banach function spaces.J. Fourier Anal. Appl., 29(5):Paper No. 64, 46 pp., 2023

work page 2023
[26]

Hale and V

E. Hale and V. Naibo. Weighted bi-parameter fractional Leibniz rules. J. Math. Anal. Appl., 546(1):Paper No. 129237, 18 pp., 2025

work page 2025
[27]

Kato and G

T. Kato and G. Ponce. Commutator estimates and the Euler and Navier-Stokes equations.Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 41(7):891–907, 1988

work page 1988
[28]

C. E. Kenig, G. Ponce, and L. Vega. Well-posedness and scattering results for the generalized Korteweg-de Vries equation via the contraction principle.Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 46(4):527–620, 1993

work page 1993
[29]

D. Li. On Kato-Ponce and fractional Leibniz.Rev. Mat. Iberoam., 35(1):23–100, 2019

work page 2019
[30]

Liu and Y

L. Liu and Y. Zhang. Fractional Leibniz-type rules on spaces of homogeneous type.Potential Anal., 60(2):555–595, 2024

work page 2024
[31]

F. K. Ly and V. Naibo. Fractional Leibniz rules associated to bilinear Hermite pseudo-multipliers. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN, (7):5401–5437, 2023

work page 2023
[32]

S.MukherjeeandS.Parui.WeightedinequalitiesformultilinearfractionaloperatorsinDunklsetting. J. Pseudo-Differ. Oper. Appl., 13(3):Paper No. 34, 31 pp., 2022

work page 2022
[33]

Mukherjee and S

S. Mukherjee and S. Parui. Weighted bilinear multiplier theorems in Dunkl setting via singular integrals. Forum Math., 37(2):663–692, 2025

work page 2025
[34]

Muscalu, J

C. Muscalu, J. Pipher, T. Tao, and C. Thiele. Bi-parameter paraproducts.Acta Math., 193(2):269– 296, 2004

work page 2004
[35]

Muscalu and W

C. Muscalu and W. Schlag. Classical and multilinear harmonic analysis. Vol. II, volume 138 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013

work page 2013
[36]

Oh and X

S. Oh and X. Wu. OnL1 endpoint Kato-Ponce inequality.Math. Res. Lett., 27(4):1129–1163, 2020

work page 2020
[37]

Oh and X

S. Oh and X. Wu. The Kato-Ponce inequality with polynomial weights.Math. Z., 302(3):1489–1526, 2022

work page 2022
[38]

Rösler.Dunkl operators: theory and applications, in Orthogonal Polynomials and Special Func- tions, Lecture Notes in Math.Springer, Berlin, 2003

M. Rösler.Dunkl operators: theory and applications, in Orthogonal Polynomials and Special Func- tions, Lecture Notes in Math.Springer, Berlin, 2003

work page 2003
[39]

Thangavelu and Y

S. Thangavelu and Y. Xu. Convolution operator and maximal function for the Dunkl transform.J. Anal. Math., 97:25–55, 2005

work page 2005
[40]

B. Wróbel. Approaching bilinear multipliers via a functional calculus.J. Geom. Anal., 28(4):3048– 3080, 2018

work page 2018
[41]

B. Wróbel. Personal communication

work page
[42]

X. Wu. Weighted endpoint fractional Leibniz rule.Arch. Math. (Basel), 118(4):399–412, 2022. School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia Email address: the.bui@mq.edu.au Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai– 400076, India. Email address: sumanmukherjee822@gmail.com

work page 2022

[1] [1]

Amri, J.-P

B. Amri, J.-P. Anker, and M. Sifi. Three results in Dunkl analysis.Colloq. Math., 118(1):299–312, 2010

work page 2010

[2] [2]

Bényi, T

A. Bényi, T. Oh, and T. Zhao. Fractional Leibniz rule on the torus. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 153(1):207–221, 2025

work page 2025

[3] [3]

Bourgain and D

J. Bourgain and D. Li. On an endpoint Kato-Ponce inequality.Differential Integral Equations, 27(11- 12):1037–1072, 2014

work page 2014

[4] [4]

Brummer and V

J. Brummer and V. Naibo. Bilinear operators with homogeneous symbols, smooth molecules, and Kato-Ponce inequalities.Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 146(3):1217–1230, 2018

work page 2018

[5] [5]

F. M. Christ and M. I. Weinstein. Dispersion of small amplitude solutions of the generalized Korteweg-de Vries equation.J. Funct. Anal., 100(1):87–109, 1991

work page 1991

[6] [6]

R. R. Coifman and Y. Meyer. Nonlinear harmonic analysis, operator theory and P.D.E. InBei- jing lectures in harmonic analysis (Beijing, 1984), volume 112 ofAnn. of Math. Stud., pages 3–45. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 1986

work page 1984

[7] [7]

Coulhon and X

T. Coulhon and X. T. Duong. Maximal regularity and kernel bounds: observations on a theorem by Hieber and Prüss.Adv. Diff. Equ., 5:343–368, 2000

work page 2000

[8] [8]

Cruz-Uribe and V

D. Cruz-Uribe and V. Naibo. Kato-Ponce inequalities on weighted and variable Lebesgue spaces. Differential Integral Equations, 29(9-10):801–836, 2016

work page 2016

[9] [9]

M. F. E. de Jeu. The Dunkl transform.Invent. Math., 113(1):147–162, 1993

work page 1993

[10] [10]

Douglas and L

S. Douglas and L. Grafakos. Weighted Kato-Ponce inequalities for multiple factors.Math. Nachr., 297(10):3700–3722, 2024

work page 2024

[11] [11]

C. F. Dunkl. Differential-difference operators associated to reflection groups.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 311(1):167–183, 1989

work page 1989

[12] [12]

C. F. Dunkl. Integral kernels with reflection group invariance.Canad. J. Math., 43(6):1213–1227, 1991

work page 1991

[13] [13]

C. F. Dunkl. Hankel transforms associated to finite reflection groups. InHypergeometric functions on domains of positivity, Jack polynomials, and applications, volume 138 ofContemp. Math., pages 123–138. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1992

work page 1992

[14] [14]

Dziubański and A

J. Dziubański and A. Hejna. Hörmander’s multiplier theorem for the Dunkl transform.J. Funct. Anal., 277(7):2133–2159, 2019

work page 2019

[15] [15]

Dziubański and A

J. Dziubański and A. Hejna. Remark on atomic decompositions for the Hardy spaceH 1 in the rational Dunkl setting.Studia Math., 251(1):89–110, 2020

work page 2020

[16] [16]

Dziubański and A

J. Dziubański and A. Hejna. Remarks on Dunkl translations of non-radial kernels.J. Fourier Anal. Appl., 29(4):Paper No. 52, 35 pp., 2023

work page 2023

[17] [17]

J. Fang, H. Li, and J. Zhao. The fractional Leibniz rules on the product space of Carnot groups. Banach J. Math. Anal., 19(2):Paper No. 17, 20 pp., 2025

work page 2025

[18] [18]

Fujiwara, V

K. Fujiwara, V. Georgiev, and T. Ozawa. Higher order fractional Leibniz rule.J. Fourier Anal. Appl., 24(3):650–665, 2018

work page 2018

[19] [19]

D. V. Gorbachev, V. I. Ivanov, and S. Y. Tikhonov. PositiveLp-bounded Dunkl-type generalized translation operator and its applications.Constr. Approx., 49(3):555–605, 2019

work page 2019

[20] [20]

Grafakos.Modern Fourier analysis, volume 250 ofGraduate Texts in Mathematics

L. Grafakos.Modern Fourier analysis, volume 250 ofGraduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer, New York, third edition, 2014

work page 2014

[21] [21]

Grafakos, D

L. Grafakos, D. Maldonado, and V. Naibo. A remark on an endpoint Kato-Ponce inequality.Differ- ential Integral Equations, 27(5-6):415–424, 2014

work page 2014

[22] [22]

Grafakos and S

L. Grafakos and S. Oh. The Kato-Ponce inequality. Comm. Partial Differential Equations , 39(6):1128–1157, 2014. 26 THE ANH BUI AND SUMAN MUKHERJEE

work page 2014

[23] [23]

Grafakos and R

L. Grafakos and R. H. Torres. Discrete decompositions for bilinear operators and almost diagonal conditions. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 354(3):1153–1176, 2002

work page 2002

[24] [24]

Gulisashvili and M

A. Gulisashvili and M. A. Kon. Exact smoothing properties of Schrödinger semigroups.Amer. J. Math., 118(6):1215–1248, 1996

work page 1996

[25] [25]

Hale and V

E. Hale and V. Naibo. Fractional Leibniz rules in the setting of quasi-Banach function spaces.J. Fourier Anal. Appl., 29(5):Paper No. 64, 46 pp., 2023

work page 2023

[26] [26]

Hale and V

E. Hale and V. Naibo. Weighted bi-parameter fractional Leibniz rules. J. Math. Anal. Appl., 546(1):Paper No. 129237, 18 pp., 2025

work page 2025

[27] [27]

Kato and G

T. Kato and G. Ponce. Commutator estimates and the Euler and Navier-Stokes equations.Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 41(7):891–907, 1988

work page 1988

[28] [28]

C. E. Kenig, G. Ponce, and L. Vega. Well-posedness and scattering results for the generalized Korteweg-de Vries equation via the contraction principle.Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 46(4):527–620, 1993

work page 1993

[29] [29]

D. Li. On Kato-Ponce and fractional Leibniz.Rev. Mat. Iberoam., 35(1):23–100, 2019

work page 2019

[30] [30]

Liu and Y

L. Liu and Y. Zhang. Fractional Leibniz-type rules on spaces of homogeneous type.Potential Anal., 60(2):555–595, 2024

work page 2024

[31] [31]

F. K. Ly and V. Naibo. Fractional Leibniz rules associated to bilinear Hermite pseudo-multipliers. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN, (7):5401–5437, 2023

work page 2023

[32] [32]

S.MukherjeeandS.Parui.WeightedinequalitiesformultilinearfractionaloperatorsinDunklsetting. J. Pseudo-Differ. Oper. Appl., 13(3):Paper No. 34, 31 pp., 2022

work page 2022

[33] [33]

Mukherjee and S

S. Mukherjee and S. Parui. Weighted bilinear multiplier theorems in Dunkl setting via singular integrals. Forum Math., 37(2):663–692, 2025

work page 2025

[34] [34]

Muscalu, J

C. Muscalu, J. Pipher, T. Tao, and C. Thiele. Bi-parameter paraproducts.Acta Math., 193(2):269– 296, 2004

work page 2004

[35] [35]

Muscalu and W

C. Muscalu and W. Schlag. Classical and multilinear harmonic analysis. Vol. II, volume 138 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013

work page 2013

[36] [36]

Oh and X

S. Oh and X. Wu. OnL1 endpoint Kato-Ponce inequality.Math. Res. Lett., 27(4):1129–1163, 2020

work page 2020

[37] [37]

Oh and X

S. Oh and X. Wu. The Kato-Ponce inequality with polynomial weights.Math. Z., 302(3):1489–1526, 2022

work page 2022

[38] [38]

Rösler.Dunkl operators: theory and applications, in Orthogonal Polynomials and Special Func- tions, Lecture Notes in Math.Springer, Berlin, 2003

M. Rösler.Dunkl operators: theory and applications, in Orthogonal Polynomials and Special Func- tions, Lecture Notes in Math.Springer, Berlin, 2003

work page 2003

[39] [39]

Thangavelu and Y

S. Thangavelu and Y. Xu. Convolution operator and maximal function for the Dunkl transform.J. Anal. Math., 97:25–55, 2005

work page 2005

[40] [40]

B. Wróbel. Approaching bilinear multipliers via a functional calculus.J. Geom. Anal., 28(4):3048– 3080, 2018

work page 2018

[41] [41]

B. Wróbel. Personal communication

work page

[42] [42]

X. Wu. Weighted endpoint fractional Leibniz rule.Arch. Math. (Basel), 118(4):399–412, 2022. School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia Email address: the.bui@mq.edu.au Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai– 400076, India. Email address: sumanmukherjee822@gmail.com

work page 2022