Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 89 references

Complex structured light generation using printed liquid crystal droplets

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Printed liquid crystal droplets turn a known drawback—spatially varying birefringence—into a compact platform for generating skyrmionic, vector-vortex, and singular structured light.

desk verdict A useful printed-droplet platform for structured light, but the OAM-2 and skyrmion headline claims are visually inferred rather than quantitatively demonstrated. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.10186 v1 pith:7JXETKXG submitted 2025-07-14 physics.optics physics.app-ph

Xuke Qiu , Runchen Zhang , Yifei Ma , Zimo Zhao , Zipei Song , Alva C. J. Orr , Mengmeng Li , Waqas Kamal
show 5 more authors
Jinge Guo Alfonso A. Castrejón-pita Steve J. Elston Stephen M. Morris Chao He
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsphysics.app-ph
keywords liquidcrystalschiralnematicsstructuredlightinkjetprintingskyrmionicbeamsorbitalangularmomentumvectorpolarizationsingularities
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to show that inkjet-printed liquid crystal droplets, whose spatial birefringence is usually treated as a limitation for microlenses, can instead act as ready-made passive generators of structured light. By choosing the substrate alignment (homeotropic or planar) and adding a chiral dopant, the droplet's internal director field organizes into distinct patterns, each with its own birefringence map. The authors report three resulting beam families: skyrmionic full-Poincaré beams carrying two units of orbital angular momentum, radially or azimuthally polarized vector beams, and beams with polarization singularities. If the demonstration holds, printed droplets become a cheap, scalable, compact alternative to multi-SLM setups and bulk fabricated q-plates for complex beam generation.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the droplet's internal director field, treated as a continuous spatially varying retarder. Mueller-matrix polarimetry combined with Mueller-matrix polarimetric decomposition yields maps of retardance and fast-axis orientation. In the homeotropic nematic droplet, the fast-axis map winds twice around the center, the signature of a q-plate with topological charge $q=1$, so the droplet is expected to add two units of orbital angular momentum ($l=2q$) to circularly polarized light. In the planar nematic droplet, the relevant structure is the disclination line separating mirror-image director tilts, which produces the near-$\pi$ phase step that yields radial/azimuthal vector beams. In the chiral nematic droplet, spatially patterned circular retardance produces handedness-defined L lines and polarization singularities.

What would settle it

A decisive test is to measure the transmitted field with a mode sorter or to interfere the droplet arm with a reference beam carrying $l=-2$: for a pure two-unit OAM beam the fringes become straight and parallel, while any residual curvature or mixed fringe pattern would show that the two-armed spiral is not a clean $l=2$ mode.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's claim is that the spatially varying birefringence of a single microdroplet is sufficient to encode complex vectorial structure in transmitted light. For a nematic droplet on a homeotropic layer, the director tilts radially, making the droplet behave like an elliptical retarder whose fast axis winds twice around the azimuth; under circular illumination this produces a full-Poincaré beam whose polarization texture is a Stokes skyrmion, and whose two-armed interferogram indicates two units of orbital angular momentum. On a planar layer, a mirror-symmetric director tilt across a disclination line creates opposite retardance on the two sides, converting linear input into azimuthal or radial polarization with a phase discontinuity. In the long-pitch chiral nematic version, concentric retardance rings and localized circular-retarder behavior give rise to L-line polarization singularities. The paper presents these as three manifestations of one mechanism: the droplet's intrinsic director configuration, selected by processing conditions, acts as a beam-shaping element.

Load-bearing premise

The OAM-2 result assumes the homeotropic nematic droplet acts like an ideal q-plate—its fast axis winding twice around the center with near-uniform half-wave retardance—so that circular input exits as a clean spin-flipped $l=2$ vortex, but the measured retardance is not uniform and the output contains a mixture of spin-flipped and spin-preserved light.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Droplet arrays can be printed at rates near a hundred per second, making wafer-scale passive structured-light components feasible.
  • The three droplet classes show that one fabrication platform covers multiple beam families: skyrmionic/OAM beams, cylindrical vector beams, and singular polarization fields.
  • Because the droplets are compact (about 120 micrometers in diameter), they can be integrated into miniaturized optical systems and photonic-chip-scale assemblies.
  • The approach removes the need for multi-SLM or bulky passive setups for generating full-Poincaré and vector-vortex beams; a single printed droplet plus a polarizer can suffice.
  • Alignment-layer choice and chiral pitch give a simple tuning handle that selects which structured-light family a droplet produces.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the same droplet platform could generate higher-order skyrmionic or vortex textures by patterning the alignment layer rather than relying on spontaneous director fields, since the q-plate action scales with the winding number of the fast axis.
  • Editorial inference: because printing forms arrays at high speed, droplet arrays could act as parallel structured-light sources for multichannel optical communication, provided each droplet's output mode purity is characterized.
  • Editorial inference: a direct test of the OAM claim would be a mode-sorter measurement of the transmitted field; a clean $l=2$ component would require the spin-flipped amplitude to dominate across the aperture, which the reported nonuniform retardance does not guarantee.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports three types of inkjet-printed liquid-crystal droplets—nematic on homeotropic alignment, nematic on planar alignment, and long-pitch chiral nematic on planar alignment—as passive structured-light generators. Using Mueller-matrix imaging polarimetry and MMPD, the authors map the retardance and fast-axis distributions of each droplet, and then use a Mach-Zehnder interferometer with circular or linear polarization filtering to record interference patterns. They claim that the homeotropic droplet produces a full Poincaré/skyrmionic beam carrying two units of OAM, that the planar droplet produces radially/azimuthally polarized beams, and that the chiral droplet produces polarization singularities (L-lines). The central idea—using intrinsic droplet anisotropy as a feature rather than a drawback—is attractive and the raw optical data appear to support qualitative polarization structuring, but the quantitative headline claims (OAM order 2, full Poincaré coverage, skyrmion character, singular-index structure) are inferred from color maps and single interferograms rather than measured.

Significance. If the quantitative claims were fully supported, this would be a practical contribution: a single inkjet-printing platform generating three classes of structured light with compact passive elements, potentially scalable to arrays for photonic integration. The paper's strengths are the Mueller-matrix characterization performed forward (no beam property is used to fit the retardance maps), the direct interferometric visualization, and the clear presentation of three distinct droplet configurations. However, the current evidence is not yet sufficient for the strong claims in the abstract; the distinguishing measurements (OAM spectrum, skyrmion number, Stokes coverage, mode purity, singularity indices) are absent. The work is therefore a promising demonstration of a fabrication and characterization platform rather than a quantitative proof of the named structured-light states.

major comments (4)
  1. [a) Printed nematic LC on homeotropic alignment layer, Figs. 2a(ii) and 2b(ii)] The assertion that the generated beam 'carries two units of OAM' is not established by the data shown. The MMPD fast-axis map is interpreted through a q-plate relation that requires a uniform half-wave retardance, but the measured retardance in Fig. 2a(ii) rises from 0 to π and then decreases. For a space-variant retarder with retardance δ(r), the transmitted field contains a spin-flipped component with amplitude proportional to sin(δ/2) and a non-spin-flipped component proportional to cos(δ/2); the left-circular PSA in the Mach-Zehnder arrangement isolates only the former. A two-armed spiral in this single polarization channel demonstrates an azimuthal phase winding of that component, but not a pure l=2 OAM eigenstate of the total beam. The text itself notes that the interferogram contains 'vortex and spherical-like phase components', so counting spiral arms is not a quantitative OAM measurement. Please provide an OAM spectrum or mode decomposition, or explicitly restrict the claim to the spin-flipped component with quantified modal weights.
  2. [a) Printed nematic LC on homeotropic alignment layer, Fig. 2b(i)] The labels 'full Poincaré beam' and 'Stokes optical skyrmion' are read off color-coded polarization maps rather than from quantitative Stokes-vector data. No skyrmion number or topological charge is computed, and no criterion is given for how the beam boundary is defined where the retardance falls back from its maximum. Since these are central claims in the abstract, the authors need to compute the Stokes parameters from independently measured intensity projections, quantify the coverage of the Poincaré sphere, and evaluate the skyrmion number with a clearly stated normalization; alternatively, the abstract and text should be revised to describe the pattern as skyrmionic-like or locally resembling a skyrmion.
  3. [b) Printed nematic LC on planar alignment layer, Figs. 3b and 3c] The claim that horizontally and vertically polarized inputs produce azimuthally and radially polarized beams is supported only by visual inspection of polarization patterns and two interferograms. There is no measurement of the local linear polarization orientation as a function of azimuth, no comparison with ideal radial/azimuthal distributions, and no mode-purity or cross-talk estimate. Please provide quantitative Stokes (S1, S2) maps, fit the local linear polarization angle to the expected azimuthal dependence, and report the deviation or mode purity so that the 'radial/azimuthal' classification is quantitative rather than visual.
  4. [c) Printed long-pitch chiral nematic LC on planar alignment layer, Fig. 4b(i)] The 'optical singularities' claim rests on drawing red dashed L-lines over one polarization map; no calculation of the singularity indices (L-line/C-point indices), no phase measurement showing scalar or vector vortices, and no demonstration that these are robust singularities rather than low-contrast polarization contours. Since this is one of the three headline demonstrations, please quantify the singularity structure (indices and/or topological charge of the polarization ellipse field) or revise the claim to avoid overstating the result.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Keywords] The keyword list contains the typo 'skymion'; it should be 'skyrmion'.
  2. [Fig. 2b(ii) caption and main text] The caption refers to 'red dashed lines' while the main text says 'two distinct red arrows'; please reconcile the description of the interferogram annotation.
  3. [a) Printed nematic LC on homeotropic alignment layer] The text explains that the apparent 180° jumps in the fast-axis map are artifacts of the arctan range, but the conclusion that the fast axis 'rotates twice around the azimuthal angle' requires an unwrapping procedure; please describe how the unwrapping was performed and how the winding number was obtained.
  4. [Methods] The Methods section does not describe how the Stokes/polarization images in Figs. 2–4 were obtained; please add the polarization-imaging setup, the measurement procedure, and the analysis used to generate the polarization maps.
  5. [Fig. 1c and Results] The claim that an array of droplets generates a full Poincaré beam is not defined quantitatively; please specify what is plotted in Fig. 1c and how full Poincaré coverage was assessed.
  6. [General] All quantitative results appear to be for a single representative droplet of each type; please report droplet-to-droplet statistics to support the claimed reproducibility and scalability of the printing platform.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: beam properties are forward-derived from Mueller-matrix maps and independently verified by polarization and interferometric measurements.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is forward and non-circular. The spatially varying retardance and fast-axis maps are obtained from Mueller-matrix polarimetry (MMPD) of the droplets (Figs. 2a(ii), 3a(ii), 4a(ii)); these maps are then used to predict the generated polarization structure (full Poincaré/skyrmionic, radial/azimuthal, singularities). The beam properties are verified by independent polarimetric output images and Mach-Zehnder interferograms (Figs. 2b, 3b/c, 4b), not fed back into the retardance or fast-axis extraction. The OAM-2 interpretation is a standard q-plate relation [46] applied to the measured fast-axis winding, and is then checked by the two-armed spiral in the interferogram; the spiral is a separate measurement, so the claim does not reduce to the input. The text itself notes the interferogram contains 'spherical-like phase components', which is a quantitative caveat about OAM purity rather than a circular step. Heavy self-citation exists (e.g., Refs. [11], [46], [47], [61]), but the cited results are used as background or comparisons and are not the sole evidence for the measured output; the experimental data are self-contained. The skeptic's objection concerns quantitative support for pure OAM-2 or skyrmion topological number, not circularity. Accordingly, no specific reduction of a prediction to a fitted input or to a self-citation chain can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced; all structures are known LC director configurations and standard beam classes. The central claims rest on the elliptical-retarder modeling of the droplet, the assumed homeotropic boundary condition at the air interface, and the standard q-plate OAM relation.

free parameters (2)
  • Chiral dopant concentration (R811 in E7) = 4 wt.% (pitch 2.5 um)
    Hand-chosen to set the chiral nematic pitch for the third droplet type; the polarization-singularity result depends on this concentration, but it is not fitted to the output beams.
  • MMPD elliptical-retarder variables (retardance and fast axis) = spatially varying maps, not constants
    Per-pixel retardance and fast-axis values are obtained by fitting each Mueller matrix to an elliptical retarder model; the OAM-2 and full Poincaré claims rest on these fitted maps.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The droplet can be modeled as a single elliptical retarder with spatially varying retardance and fast axis.
    Invoked in Section a: 'Since the droplet is a continuous birefringent medium, we use an elliptical retarder model...' The validity of this lumped model for a 28-micrometer-thick droplet is not verified against a full director-field simulation.
  • domain assumption The LC director at the air/LC interface favors homeotropic alignment regardless of substrate alignment.
    Stated in Results: 'Regardless of the alignment choice, the air/LC interface typically favors a homeotropic alignment.' The inferred director field depends on this boundary condition.
  • standard math For circularly polarized input, a linear retarder whose fast axis rotates by 2 times the azimuthal angle imparts OAM 2 to the spin-flipped component.
    Q-plate relation cited from Ref [46]; used to convert the fast-axis winding into the two-unit OAM claim.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Complex structured light generation using printed liquid crystal droplets." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7JXETKXG

@misc{pith2026250710186,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Complex structured light generation using printed liquid crystal droplets},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7JXETKXG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.10186}
}
read the original abstract

Inkjet-printed liquid crystal (LC) droplets exhibit an intricate spatially-varying birefringence due to their complex internal director configuration. While such anisotropy is often viewed as a drawback when LC droplets are used as microlenses, here we leverage this remarkable birefringence property to generate complex structured light. Through a selection of the alignment layer, and by varying the chiral pitch, we create three distinct droplet types with tailored intrinsic director configurations, each exhibiting a unique birefringence distribution for structured light beam generation. We show that these printed LC droplets can generate beams that exhibit skyrmionic structures carrying two units of orbital angular momentum, beams that contain azimuthal/radial polarized fields, and beams with polarization singularities. Our method enables new possibilities for using LC droplet technology to engineer sophisticated optical beam patterns.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

89 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    T. Bell, B. Li, S. Zhang, in Wiley Encyclopedia of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, 2016

    2016

  2. [2]

    S. N. Khonina, A. V . Ustinov, A. P. Porfirev, Photonics 2023, 10

    2023

  3. [3]

    O. V . Angelsky, A. Y . Bekshaev, S. G. Hanson, C. Y . Zenkova, I. I. Mokhun, J. Zheng, Frontiers in Physics 2020, 8

    2020

  4. [4]

    Zhan, Advances in Optics and Photonics 2009, 1

    Q. Zhan, Advances in Optics and Photonics 2009, 1

    2009

  5. [5]

    Bauer, P

    T. Bauer, P. Banzer, E. Karimi, S. Orlov, A. Rubano, L. Marrucci, E. Santamato, R. W. Boyd, G. Leuchs, Science 2015, 347, 964

    2015

  6. [6]

    Rosales-Guzmán, B

    C. Rosales-Guzmán, B. Ndagano, A. Forbes, Journal of Optics 2018, 20

    2018

  7. [7]

    Maurer, A

    C. Maurer, A. Jesacher, S. Fürhapter, S. Bernet, M. Ritsch-Marte, New Journal of Physics 2007, 9, 78

    2007

  8. [8]

    Parigi, V

    V . Parigi, V . D'Ambrosio, C. Arnold, L. Marrucci, F. Sciarrino, J. Laurat, Nat Commun 2015, 6, 7706

    2015

Show all 89 references
  1. [9]

    M. J. Padgett, Opt Express 2017, 25, 11265

    2017

  2. [10]

    A. M. Yao, M. J. Padgett, Advances in Optics and Photonics 2011, 3

    2011

  3. [11]

    M. Li, S. J. Elston, C. He, X. Qiu, A. A. Castrejón‐Pita, S. M. Morris, Advanced Optical Materials 2024, 12

    2024

  4. [12]

    Courtial, D

    J. Courtial, D. A. Robertson, K. Dholakia, L. Allen, M. J. Padgett, Physical Review Letters 1998, 81, 4828

    1998

  5. [13]

    Molina-Terriza, J

    G. Molina-Terriza, J. P. Torres, L. Torner, Phys Rev Lett 2002, 88, 013601

    2002

  6. [14]

    Ritsch-Marte, Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 2017, 375

    M. Ritsch-Marte, Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 2017, 375

    2017

  7. [15]

    S. W. Hell, J. Wichmann, Opt. Lett. 1994, 19, 780

    1994

  8. [16]

    M. E. J. Friese, T. A. Nieminen, N. R. Heckenberg, H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop, Nature 1998, 394, 348. [17]V . Garces-Chavez, D. McGloin, M. J. Padgett, W. Dultz, H. Schmitzer, K. Dholakia, Phys Rev Lett 2003, 91, 093602

    1998

  9. [18]

    Padgett, R

    M. Padgett, R. Bowman, Nature Photonics 2011, 5, 343

    2011

  10. [19]

    C. He, J. Lin, J. Chang, J. Antonello, B. Dai, J. Wang, J. Cui, J. Qi, M. Wu, D. S. Elson, P. Xi, A. Forbes, M. J. Booth, Optica 2022, 9, 1109

    2022

  11. [20]

    C. He, J. Chang, P. S. Salter, Y . Shen, B. Dai, P. Li, Y . Jin, T. Samlan Chandran, M. Li, T. Aziz, J. Wang, J. Antonello, D. Yang, Q. Ji, J. Lin, D. S. Elson, M. Zhang, H. He, H. Ma, M. J. Booth, Advanced Photonics 2022, 4, 26001

    2022

  12. [21]

    C. He, M. Booth, Opt. Photon. News 2020, 31, 47

    2020

  13. [22]

    C. He, J. Lin, B. Dai, P. Xi, M. Booth, presented at Proc.SPIE, 2020

    2020

  14. [23]

    C. He, J. Chang, H. He, S. Liu, D. S. Elson, H. Ma, M. J. Booth, presented at Proc.SPIE, 2020

    2020

  15. [24]

    F. Yue, D. Wen, J. Xin, B. D. Gerardot, J. Li, X. Chen, ACS Photonics 2016, 3, 1558. 14

    2016

  16. [25]

    D'Ambrosio, G

    V . D'Ambrosio, G. Carvacho, F. Graffitti, C. Vitelli, B. Piccirillo, L. Marrucci, F. Sciarrino, Physical Review A 2016, 94

    2016

  17. [26]

    N. M. Litchinitser, Science 2012, 337, 1054

    2012

  18. [27]

    Li, Y .-P

    Z.-X. Li, Y .-P. Ruan, P. Chen, J. Tang, W. Hu, K.-Y . Xia, Y .-Q. Lu, Chin. Opt. Lett. 2021, 19, 112601

    2021

  19. [28]

    Giordani, A

    T. Giordani, A. Suprano, E. Polino, F. Acanfora, L. Innocenti, A. Ferraro, M. Paternostro, N. Spagnolo, F. Sciarrino, Physical Review Letters 2020, 124, 160401

    2020

  20. [29]

    Radwell, R

    N. Radwell, R. D. Hawley, J. B. Götte, S. Franke-Arnold, Nature Communications 2016, 7, 10564

    2016

  21. [30]

    Rong, Y .-J

    Z.-Y . Rong, Y .-J. Han, S.-Z. Wang, C.-S. Guo, Opt. Express 2014, 22, 1636

    2014

  22. [31]

    Cai, Z.-X

    M.-Q. Cai, Z.-X. Wang, J. Liang, Y .-K. Wang, X.-Z. Gao, Y . Li, C. Tu, H.-T. Wang, Appl. Opt. 2017, 56, 6175

    2017

  23. [32]

    Zhang, P

    Y . Zhang, P. Li, C. Ma, S. Liu, H. Cheng, L. Han, J. Zhao, Appl. Opt. 2017, 56, 4956

    2017

  24. [33]

    Q. Hu, Y . Dai, C. He, M. J. Booth, Optics Communications 2020, 459, 125028

    2020

  25. [34]

    A. S. Rao, P. Kumar, T. Omatsu, presented at 2023 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics Europe & European Quantum Electronics Conference (CLEO/Europe-EQEC), 26-30 June 2023, 2023

    2023

  26. [35]

    Szatkowski, J

    M. Szatkowski, J. Masajada, I. Augustyniak, K. Nowacka, Optics Communications 2020, 463, 125341

    2020

  27. [36]

    Zhang, M

    Q. Zhang, M. Gu, Light: Science & Applications 2024, 13, 32

    2024

  28. [37]

    C. He, Q. Hu, Y . Dai, M. J. Booth, presented at Imaging and Applied Optics Congress, Washington, DC, 2020/06/22, 2020

    2020

  29. [38]

    Q. Hu, C. He, M. J. Booth, Journal of Optics 2021, 23, 065602

    2021

  30. [39]

    Y . Dai, C. He, J. Wang, R. Turcotte, L. Fish, M. Wincott, Q. Hu, M. J. Booth, Opt. Express 2019, 27, 35797

    2019

  31. [40]

    Mei-Li, C

    H. Mei-Li, C. Mao-Ling, C. Chau-Jern, Optical Engineering 2007, 46, 070501

    2007

  32. [41]

    Cardano, E

    F. Cardano, E. Karimi, S. Slussarenko, L. Marrucci, C. de Lisio, E. Santamato, Appl. Opt. 2012, 51, C1

    2012

  33. [42]

    Rubano, F

    A. Rubano, F. Cardano, B. Piccirillo, L. Marrucci, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2019, 36, D70

    2019

  34. [43]

    Zhang, J

    Y . Zhang, J. Gao, X. Yang, Scientific Reports 2019, 9, 9969

    2019

  35. [44]

    Y . Bao, J. Ni, C.-W. Qiu, Advanced Materials 2020, 32, 1905659

    2020

  36. [45]

    Y . Shen, C. He, Z. Song, B. Chen, H. He, Y . Ma, J. A. J. Fells, S. J. Elston, S. M. Morris, M. J. Booth, A. Forbes, Physical Review Applied 2024, 21, 024025

    2024

  37. [46]

    C. He, J. Chang, Q. Hu, J. Wang, J. Antonello, H. He, S. Liu, J. Lin, B. Dai, D. S. Elson, P. Xi, H. Ma, M. J. Booth, Nature Communications 2019, 10, 4264

    2019

  38. [47]

    A. A. Wang, Y . Ma, Y . Zhang, Z. Zhao, Y . Cai, X. Qiu, B. Dong, C. He, 2024

    2024

  39. [48]

    Parry, S

    E. Parry, S. Bolis, S. J. Elston, A. A. Castrejón -Pita, S. M. Morris, Advanced Engineering Materials 2018, 20, 1700774

    2018

  40. [49]

    Jiang, X

    J. Jiang, X. Chen, Z. Mei, H. Chen, J. Chen, X. Wang, S. Li, R. Zhang, G. Zheng, W. Li, Micromachines 2024, 15

    2024

  41. [50]

    Kamal, M

    W. Kamal, M. Li, J. -D. Lin, E. Parry, Y . Jin, S. J. Elston, A. A. Castrejón-Pita, S. M. Morris, Advanced Optical Materials 2022, 10, 2101748

    2022

  42. [51]

    J.-U. Park, M. Hardy, S. J. Kang, K. Barton, K. Adair, D. k. Mukhopadhyay, C. Y . Lee, M. S. Strano, A. G. Alleyne, J. G. Georgiadis, P. M. Ferreira, J. A. Rogers, Nature Materials 2007, 6, 782

    2007

  43. [52]

    J.-U. Park, J. H. Lee, U. Paik, Y . Lu, J. A. Rogers, Nano Letters 2008, 8, 4210

    2008

  44. [53]

    Mishra, K

    S. Mishra, K. L. Barton, A. G. Alleyne, P. M. Ferreira, J. A. Rogers, Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering 2010, 20, 095026

    2010

  45. [54]

    Parry, D.-J

    E. Parry, D.-J. Kim, A. A. Castrejón-Pita, S. J. Elston, S. M. Morris, Optical Materials 2018, 80, 71

    2018

  46. [55]

    Kamal, J.-D

    W. Kamal, J.-D. Lin, S. J. Elston, T. Ali, A. A. Castrejón-Pita, S. M. Morris, Advanced Materials Interfaces 2020, 7, 2000578

    2020

  47. [56]

    A. M. Beckley, T. G. Brown, M. A. Alonso, Opt. Express 2010, 18, 10777

    2010

  48. [57]

    C. He, J. Lin, J. Chang, J. Antonello, B. Dai, J. Wang, J. Cui, J. Qi, M. Wu, D. S. Elson, Optica 2022, 9, 1109

    2022

  49. [58]

    S. Gao, F. C. Speirits, F. Castellucci, S. Franke-Arnold, S. M. Barnett, J. B. Götte, Physical Review A 2020, 102, 053513. 15

    2020

  50. [59]

    C. He, Y . Shen, A. Forbes, Light: Science & Applications 2022, 11, 205

    2022

  51. [60]

    Y . Shen, Q. Zhang, P. Shi, L. Du, X. Yuan, A. V . Zayats, Nature Photonics 2024, 18, 15

    2024

  52. [61]

    A. A. Wang, Z. Zhao, Y . Ma, Y . Cai, S. Morris, H. He, L. Luo, Z. Xie, P. Shi, Y . Shen, arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.17390 2024

    2024 arXiv

  53. [62]

    C. He, B. Chen, Z. Song, Z. Zhao, Y . Ma, H. He, L. Luo, T. Marozsak, A. Wang, R. Xu, arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.18148 2023

    2023 arXiv

  54. [63]

    A. A. Wang, Z. Zhao, Y . Ma, Y . Cai, R. Zhang, X. Shang, Y . Zhang, J. Qin, Z.-K. Pong, T. Marozsák, B. Chen, H. He, L. Luo, M. J. Booth, S. J. Elston, S. M. Morris, C. He, Light: Science & Applications 2024, 13, 314

    2024

  55. [64]

    C. He, B. Chen, Z. Song, Z. Zhao, Y . Ma, H. He, L. Luo, T. Marozsak, A. A. Wang, R. Xu, P. Huang, J. Li, X. Qiu, Y . Zhang, B. Sun, J. Cui, Y . Cai, Y . Zhang, A. Wang, M. Wang, P. Salter, J. A. J. Fells, B. Dai, S. Liu, L. Guo, Y . He, H. Ma, D. J. Royston, S. J. Elston, Q. ...

    2025

  56. [65]

    A. C. J. Orr, X. Qiu, W. Kamal, T. C. Sykes, S. J. Elston, J. M. Yeomans, S. M. Morris, A. A. Castrejon-Pita, Soft Matter 2024, 20, 7493

    2024

  57. [66]

    C. He, H. He, J. Chang, B. Chen, H. Ma, M. J. Booth, Light: Science & Applications 2021, 10, 194

    2021

  58. [67]

    S.-Y . Lu, R. A. Chipman, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1996, 13, 1106

    1996

  59. [68]

    A. C. Russell, L. Shih-Yau, presented at Proc.SPIE, 1997

    1997

  60. [69]

    T. Xuan, H. Zhai, H. He, C. He, S. Liu, H. Ma, Opt. Lett. 2022, 47, 5797

    2022

  61. [70]

    Y . Shi, C. Chen, L. Deng, N. Zeng, H. Li, Z. Liu, H. He, C. He, H. Ma, Opt. Lett. 2024, 49, 3356

    2024

  62. [71]

    R. Hao, N. Zeng, Z. Zhang, H. He, C. He, H. Ma, Opt. Lett. 2024, 49, 2273

    2024

  63. [72]

    J. Fan, N. Zeng, H. He, C. He, S. Liu, H. Ma, Journal of Innovative Optical Health Sciences 2024, 18, 2343003

    2024

  64. [73]

    Zhang, R

    Z. Zhang, R. Hao, C. Shao, C. Mi, H. He, C. He, E. Du, S. Liu, J. Wu, H. Ma, Opt. Lett. 2023, 48, 6136. [74]Z. Zheng, S. Conghui, H. Honghui, H. Chao, L. Shaoxiong, M. Hui, Journal of Biomedical Optics 2023, 28, 102905

    2023

  65. [75]

    Y . Shi, Y . Sun, R. Huang, Y . Zhou, H. Zhai, Z. Fan, Z. Ou, P. Huang, H. He, C. He, Y . Wang, H. Ma, Frontiers in Physics 2022, V olume 10 - 2022

    2022

  66. [76]

    Jintao, H

    C. Jintao, H. Honghui, H. Chao, M. Hui, presented at Proc.SPIE, 2016

    2016

  67. [77]

    R. Hao, N. Zeng, Z. Zhang, H. He, C. He, H. Ma, Opt. Express 2024, 32, 3804

    2024

  68. [78]

    L. Deng, Z. Fan, B. Chen, H. Zhai, H. He, C. He, Y . Sun, Y . Wang, H. Ma, International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2023, 24

    2023

  69. [79]

    Y . Jin, N. P. Spiller, C. He, G. Faulkner, M. J. Booth, S. J. Elston, S. M. Morris, Light: Science & Applications 2023, 12, 242

    2023

  70. [80]

    C. Shao, B. Chen, H. He, C. He, Y . Shen, H. Zhai, H. Ma, Frontiers in Chemistry 2022, V olume 10 - 2022

    2022

  71. [81]

    Zhang, X

    R. Zhang, X. Qiu, Y . Ma, Z. Zhao, A. A. Wang, J. Guo, J. Qin, S. J. Elston, S. M. Morris, C. He, arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.19811 2025

    2025 arXiv

  72. [82]

    Y . Xue, C. Kuang, S. Li, Z. Gu, X. Liu, Opt. Express 2012, 20, 17653

    2012

  73. [83]

    C. J. R. Sheppard, A. Choudhury, Appl. Opt. 2004, 43, 4322

    2004

  74. [84]

    F. Tang, Y . Wang, L. Qiu, W. Zhao, Y . Sun, Appl. Opt. 2014, 53, 7407

    2014

  75. [85]

    Cardano, E

    F. Cardano, E. Karimi, L. Marrucci, C. de Lisio, E. Santamato, Opt. Express 2013, 21, 8815

    2013

  76. [86]

    Freund, Optics Communications 2002, 201, 251

    I. Freund, Optics Communications 2002, 201, 251

    2002

  77. [87]

    Alpmann, C

    C. Alpmann, C. Schlickriede, E. Otte, C. Denz, Scientific Reports 2017, 7, 8076

    2017

  78. [88]

    Rubinsztein -Dunlop, A

    H. Rubinsztein -Dunlop, A. Forbes, M. V . Berry, M. R. Dennis, D. L. Andrews, M. Mansuripur, C. Denz, C. Alpmann, P. Banzer, T. Bauer, E. Karimi, L. Marrucci, M. Padgett, M. Ritsch-Marte, N. M. Litchinitser, N. P. Bigelow, C. Rosales-Guzmán, A. Belmonte, J. P. Torres, T. W. Ne...

    2017

  79. [89]

    Y . Shi, P. S. Salter, M. Li, R. A. Taylor, S. J. Elston, S. M. Morris, D. D. C. Bradley, Advanced Functional Materials 2021, 31, 2007493. 16

    2021

  80. [90]

    A. Xu, C. Nourshargh, P. S. Salter, C. He, S. J. Elston, M. J. Booth, S. M. Morris, ACS Photonics 2023, 10, 3401

    2023

  81. [91]

    J. Li, G. Baird, Y .-H. Lin, H. Ren, S.-T. Wu, Journal of the Society for Information Display 2005, 13, 1017

    2005

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.