Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 109 references

Impact of Cosmic Ray-driven Outflows on Lyman-$\alpha$ Emission in Cosmological Simulations

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Cosmic-ray feedback boosts Lyman-α escape and matches observed emitter luminosities, yet leaves the classic red-peak and blue-to-red diagnostics unable to distinguish it from a no-CR run.

desk verdict Honest and mostly solid; the null result for v_red/B/R is interesting, but the recombinative source-term assumption needs a sensitivity test. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.10805 v1 pith:DMM3JBUJ submitted 2025-07-14 astro-ph.GA

Taysun Kimm , Julien Devriendt , Francesco Rodriguez Montero , Adrianne Slyz , Jeremy Blaizot , Harley Katz , Beomchan Koh , Hyunmi Song This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords Lyman-alphagalaxiescosmicrayfeedbackgalacticoutflowsradiativetransfercircumgalacticmediumneutralhydrogencolumndensitysurfacebrightnessprofilescosmologicalMHDsimulations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether cosmic ray (CR) feedback leaves a detectable imprint in the Lyman-α (Lyα) emission of high-redshift galaxies, using two cosmological magnetohydrodynamic simulations of the same ~$10^{11}$ Msun halo, one with and one without CR pressure. The authors find that CR-driven outflows reduce the neutral hydrogen column density around young stars, letting Lyα photons escape more easily and producing luminosities that match observed Lyman-$\alpha$ emitters, whereas the no-CR run loses too many photons to dust. When the snapshots are post-processed with ionizing radiative transfer, however, the location of the red peak (v_red) and the blue-to-red peak ratio (B/R) become nearly identical in the two runs, because Lyα travels preferentially along low-N_HI channels carved by ionizing radiation. The diagnostics that do separate the models are the valley-to-peak flux ratio and the surface brightness profile: the CR run reproduces the observed low valley fluxes and extended halos, because Lyα scatters in the extended circumgalactic neutral gas rather than being destroyed by dust. If correct, the paper implies that CR feedback is a viable, perhaps necessary, ingredient for matching observed Lyα luminosities and halos, while cautioning against using peak-shape metrics alone to discriminate feedback models.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the escape-channel picture: after ionizing radiative transfer post-processing, a small fraction of sightlines around young stars have N_HI < $10^{18}$ $cm^{-2}$, and Lyα photons find and follow these low-density channels on their random walk, so the emergent line profile reflects the channels rather than the volume-filling neutral gas. The paper's pipeline pairs two codes: ramses-rt for the ionizing radiative transfer that sets ionization fractions (run for 20 Myr on frozen densities), and rascas, a Monte Carlo Lyα transfer code, which converts the recombinative and collisional source terms into emergent spectra. The comparison metrics are v_red, B/R, f_valley, the v_sep--f_900 plane, and PSF-convolved surface brightness profiles. The central physical mechanism at play is that resonant scattering makes Lyα a tracer of low-N_HI channels and velocity gradients rather than of the mean gas distribution, which is why a large spread in volume-filling N_HI does not translate into large v_red.

What would settle it

Run the same $10^{11}\,M_\odot$ halo with on-the-fly coupled radiation hydrodynamics (or with gas densities allowed to respond to the ionizing radiation) and remeasure $v_\mathrm{red}$ and $B/R$ in the CR and non-CR runs; if the two models separate again, the paper's central null result is an artifact of decoupled post-processing. Equivalently, an observed sample of roughly 100 LAEs with high signal-to-noise spectra that shows a bimodality in the $v_\mathrm{red}$--$B/R$ plane correlated with SB extent would contradict the predicted degeneracy.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that CR feedback shapes Lyα emission in a two-sided way: it reduces N_HI around young stars, raising the Lyα escape fraction from roughly 0.025 to 0.085 in this halo and bringing the predicted Lyα--UV relation into agreement with observed Lyman-$\alpha$ emitters, while simultaneously producing a more extended neutral circumgalactic medium that makes the surface brightness profile brighter and more extended at r > 20 kpc. Yet the two classical Lyα line diagnostics, the red-peak velocity v_red and the B/R ratio, cannot distinguish the CR run from the non-CR run once the ionization structure is recomputed with ionizing radiative transfer: both settle at v_red ~ 150-160 km/s and B/R ~ 0.6-0.7 after IGM attenuation. The reason is that Lyα photons preferentially escape through low column-density channels (N_HI < $10^{18}$ $cm^{-2}$) that the ionizing radiation opens, so the emergent spectrum is set by a tiny fraction of sightlines rather than by the volume-filling HI. The features that do separate the models are the valley flux ratio (the CR run gives 0.02 +/- 0.02 versus 0.12 +/- 0.13 for the no-CR run, closer to the observed ~0.04) and the surface brightness profiles, which in the CR case are brighter than the intrinsic emission at large radius because Lyα scatters off the extended HI instead of being destroyed by dust.

Load-bearing premise

The 20-megayear ionizing radiative transfer post-processing on frozen gas densities must reproduce the true neutral-hydrogen distribution that a fully coupled simulation would produce, because the claim that the two feedback models are indistinguishable in v_red and B/R rests entirely on those post-processed ionization structures.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The CR run places simulated galaxies on the observed M_1500--L_Lyα relation, while the no-CR run falls short because dust destroys most Lyα photons, supporting CR-driven outflows as a way to regulate star formation without overcooling.
  • v_red and B/R cannot, by themselves, discriminate CR from non-CR feedback in a cosmological setting; large statistical samples of Lyman-alpha emitters would be needed for any such test.
  • The valley-to-peak flux ratio and surface brightness profiles are the distinguishing observables, and the CR run matches the low f_valley and extended SB profiles of MUSE-detected LAEs at 3<z<4.
  • Galaxies with large v_red > 350 km/s and B/R < 0.5 are rare in the simulations, implying that observed strong-outflow LAEs may require more volume-filling neutral hydrogen in the inner halo than current models produce.
  • For non-Lyman-continuum leakers (f_900 < 0.1), the peak separation v_sep is uncorrelated with escape fraction, so Lyα spectroscopy alone cannot identify LyC leakers in that regime.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the channel-mediated escape is real, then orientation is a dominant systematic: a single galaxy viewed along different sightlines should show a spread in v_red and B/R comparable to the full observed scatter, which could be tested by comparing mock observations with integral-field surveys.
  • The decoupled post-processing freeze is the fragile step; a coupled radiation-hydrodynamic run of the same halo would test whether the low-N_HI channels survive when gas is allowed to react to heating and momentum deposition.
  • The paper's logic implies that Lyα is a poor probe of the volume-filling CGM but a good probe of the ionized channel network; observables that trace the bulk neutral gas, such as 21-cm absorption or low-ionization metal lines, should correlate with SB extent but not with v_red.
  • Because CR feedback lowers f_900 while raising L_Lyα, the model predicts a population of bright Lyα emitters that are systematically optically thick to Lyman continuum, a testable prediction against JWST-era LyC leaker samples.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper investigates whether cosmic-ray (CR) driven outflows leave observable imprints on Lyα emission by post-processing two cosmological zoom-in simulations (with and without CRs) of a ~10^11 M⊙ halo at 2<z<4 with ramses-rt ionizing radiative transfer and rascas Lyα Monte Carlo transfer. It reports that CR feedback lowers HI column densities around young stars, raising the Lyα escape fraction and yielding Lyα luminosities that better match observed LAEs (Figure 2). After ionizing RT post-processing, the red-peak velocity and blue-to-red peak ratio become similar between the two runs, while the valley-to-peak flux ratio and surface brightness profiles remain different and are better matched by the CR run. The authors interpret this as Lyα escaping through low-density ionized channels, limiting sensitivity to volume-filling HI, and they discuss possible reasons for the paucity of large-vred sightlines.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper gives a useful demonstration that CR feedback can change Lyα observables and, more importantly, that some line metrics (vred, B/R) may be degenerate between feedback models while others (fvalley, SB) are more discriminating. The work uses established public codes, compares with several observational samples, and does not fit model parameters to the target Lyα data. The main quantitative claims, however, rest on a single halo and on a source-term assumption that is inconsistent with the post-processed ionization structure, so the significance is conditional on those points being addressed.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.2, Appendix A] The recombinative Lyα source is computed by assuming all LyC photons from each star particle are absorbed by neutral hydrogen and 68% are reprocessed into Lyα, and this assumption is retained for snapshots post-processed with ramses-rt. In the post-processed runs, ramses-rt ionizes low-density channels, and §3.2.1 argues that Lyα escapes preferentially through exactly these channels, with fLyα rising from 1.1% to 10.3% while NHI,eff changes by less than a factor of two. But any LyC photon that escapes through an ionized channel is not reprocessed locally; retaining the 100% absorption assumption overestimates the intrinsic Lyα luminosity and injects Lyα at star particles along the same channels that drive the escape. The quoted fLyα values and the post-processing comparison in Figure 5(b) are therefore not robust until the Lyα source is recomputed from the actual absorbed LyC luminosity, or the results are shown to be insensitive to this correction. This affects the central claims in §3.1 and §3.2.1.
  2. [§3.1, Figure 2] The comparison is between two simulations of one halo, and the CRMHD and MHD runs differ not only by CR feedback but also by a factor of roughly four in stellar mass, by metallicity, and by star formation rate (§3.1). The statement that the CR model better matches observed LAE luminosities is therefore not yet a robust model comparison. The single-halo limitation is acknowledged in §4.1, but the abstract and Figure 2 present the luminosity claim as a general conclusion. I would ask for additional halos or realizations, or for a clearly qualified claim that the result is specific to this halo.
  3. [Appendix A] The ramses-rt post-processing updates temperature and ionization fractions while freezing hydrogen densities. Since the ionization structure is the load-bearing quantity for the post-processing conclusions (the low-density channels, and the reduction of mean vred from 234 to 162 km/s in §3.2.1), the lack of hydrodynamic response to photoheating is a non-trivial approximation. The paper would be strengthened by a test showing that the location and filling factor of the ionized channels are stable when the gas is allowed to respond, or by a quantitative estimate of the resulting uncertainty.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Appendix A] The phrase "converge to ¿98%" appears to be a typo and should read ">98%".
  2. [§4.2] "intruiguing" is a typo for "intriguing".
  3. [Figure 2 caption] The caption lists "Izotov+" without a year or reference; elsewhere in the text this is "Y. I. Izotov et al. 2018a".
  4. [Figure 1 caption] The caption quotes the halo mass as 3×10^11 M⊙, while the abstract, §1, and §3.1 quote 10^11 M⊙; please harmonize the value.
  5. [§2.2] "deutrium" should be "deuterium".
  6. [§3.2.1] The text uses "37 %" and "10 %" with a space before the percent sign, which is inconsistent with the style used elsewhere in the paper.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Lyα predictions are produced by a forward model whose parameters are not fitted to the target observations.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is a forward modeling pipeline: cosmological MHD simulations with and without CR feedback (Rodríguez Montero et al. 2024), followed by ramses-rt ionizing radiative transfer post-processing, then rascas Monte Carlo Lyα transfer, and finally a comparison with observed LAE samples. None of the free parameters (CR diffusion coefficient, dust-to-metal ratio, BPASS SED, 68% LyC-to-Lyα reprocessing fraction, 20 km/s turbulence) is fitted to the observed Lyα luminosities, vred, B/R, fvalley, or surface brightness profiles. The comparison with observations is made after the fact, so there is no fitted input being renamed as a prediction. The authors do cite their own earlier simulation paper and their own radiative-transfer codes, but these are independent of the Lyα observables being predicted: the simulations were not tuned to reproduce LAE data, and the codes are publicly established tools. The most notable approximation is the recombinative source term, which assumes all LyC photons are absorbed locally even after ramses-rt creates ionized low-density channels; this is a physical modeling inconsistency that could bias the inferred escape fractions, but it does not make any predicted quantity equal to an input by construction, nor does it reduce a claimed derivation to its assumptions. No self-citation chain or uniqueness theorem is invoked to force the central result. The paper also explicitly discusses its own limitations (single halo, resolution, missing multiphase ISM), which further indicates the claims are not tautological. Therefore, no circular step is identified and the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims depend on a set of adopted physical parameters and modeling assumptions. The CR diffusion coefficient, SN-to-CR energy fraction, dust properties, and turbulence velocity are inputs from prior literature or chosen by hand; they are not fitted to the Lyman-alpha data. The assumption that all ionizing photons are absorbed locally and reprocessed is an explicit simplification. No genuinely new entities are postulated.

free parameters (6)
  • CR diffusion coefficient kappa = 3e28 cm^2/s
    Fiducial value used in the CRMHD run; not fitted to Ly-alpha data.
  • SN energy fraction to CRs = 10%
    Adopted assumption in Section 2.1.
  • Dust-to-metal ratio = SMC value from METAL program
    Used to convert metal mass to dust mass; from Roman-Duval et al. 2022.
  • Dust survival fraction in ionized gas = 1%
    Simple prescription from Laursen et al. 2009.
  • Turbulence velocity = 20 km/s
    Uniform value assumed for Ly-alpha interaction probabilities in Section 2.2.
  • LyC-to-Ly-alpha conversion efficiency = 68%
    Assumed fraction of absorbed ionizing photons that become Ly-alpha.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Ionizing photons are all absorbed by nearby neutral hydrogen
    Section 2.2 assumes all LyC photons are absorbed locally, avoiding coupled radiation-hydrodynamics.
  • standard math Standard Monte Carlo Ly-alpha radiative transfer equations
    The rascas code implements resonant scattering, dust destruction, and gas kinematics; the equations are standard.
  • domain assumption IGM attenuation model of Inoue et al. 2014
    Applied to mock spectra to mimic intergalactic absorption; affects B/R comparisons.
  • domain assumption Cooling time resolution criterion for collisional excitation
    Cells with tcool/10 < dt are excluded to avoid unresolved collisionally excited Ly-alpha, following Mitchell et al. 2021.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Impact of Cosmic Ray-driven Outflows on Lyman-$\alpha$ Emission in Cosmological Simulations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DMM3JBUJ

@misc{pith2026250710805,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Impact of Cosmic Ray-driven Outflows on Lyman-$\alpha$ Emission in Cosmological Simulations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DMM3JBUJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.10805}
}
abstract

Cosmic ray (CR) feedback has been proposed as a powerful mechanism for driving warm gas outflows in galaxies. We use cosmological magnetohydrodynamic simulations to investigate the impact of CR feedback on neutral hydrogen (HI) in a $10^{11}\,M_\odot$ dark matter halo at $2<z<4$. To this end, we post-process the simulations with ionizing radiative transfer and perform Monte Carlo Lyman-$\alpha$ (Lya) transfer calculations. CR feedback reduces HI column densities around young stars, thereby allowing more Lya photons to escape and consequently offering a better match to the Lya luminosities of observed Lya emitters. Although galaxies with CR-driven outflows have more extended HI in the circumgalactic medium, two Lya line properties sensitive to optical depth and gas kinematics - the location of the red peak in velocity space ($v_\mathrm{red}$) and relative strength of the blue-to-red peaks ($B/R$) - cannot distinguish between the CR-driven and non-CR simulations. This is because Lya photons propagate preferentially along low HI density channels created by the ionizing radiation, thereby limiting the scattering with volume-filling HI. In contrast, the observed low flux ratios between the valley and peak and the surface brightness profiles are better reproduced in the model with CR-driven outflows because the Lya photons interact more before escaping, rather than being destroyed by dust as is the case in the non-CR simulation. We discuss the potential cause of the paucity of sightlines in simulations that exhibit prominent red peaks and large $v_\mathrm{red}$, which may require the presence of more volume-filling HI.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.10805 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparison of the UV magnitudes at 1500˚A (M1500) and Lyα properties of a simulated galaxy with ob￾servations. Black symbols indicate the observed samples of LAEs at various redshifts (F. Leclercq et al. 2017; T. Hashimoto et al. 2017; Y. I. Izotov et al. 2018a; J. Matthee et al. 2021), as indicated in the legend. Blue circles and red pentagons indicate simulated UV and Lyα from our simu￾lations without and with CR … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. LyC luminosity-weighted distribution of NHI measured from each star particle over 2 ≤ z ≤ 4. Different color-codes correspond to different simulations, as shown in the legend. Simulations post-processed with ramses-rt are shown as dot-dashed lines, while those without post-process￾ing are shown as solid lines. seen from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Stacked, angle-averaged Lyα profiles from the MHD and CRMHD runs (upper and lower panels, respec￾tively). Profiles are normalized to the maximum flux of the emergent spectrum in the CRMHD run. Intrinsic fluxes are reduced by a factor of two for clarity. The dotted and dashed lines represent the intrinsic Lyα spectrum and results of MCRT calculations on the simulation outputs without LyC post-processing, respectively… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison of the blue-to-red flux ratio of Lyα (B/R) and the location of the red peak (vred) in velocity space in simulations with (CRMHD) and without CRs (MHD). The upper panels show the angle-averaged quantities before (panel-a) and after (panel-b) LyC post-processi…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (lower panel) shows that Lyα emission is more extended in the CR feedback run for a given ob￾servation threshold. As aforementioned, although the intrinsic Lyα luminosity of the CRMHD sample is half as bright as that of MHD, Lyα escapes more efficiently. As a result, t…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Predicted Lyα profiles formed by ISM region (r < 0.1 Rvir, green symbols) or by CGM (r > 0.1 Rvir, or￾ange symbols). Note that the source positions are limited to r < 0.1 Rvir for vred,ISM or vred,CGM for easier interpretation. The vred,tot values are the same as the v…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Correlation between separation of double peaks in Lyα (vsep) and escape fraction at 900 ˚A (f900). The black star symbols represent the observed properties of LAE galax￾ies from A. Verhamme et al. (2017), while the colored points denote the results from simulations (em…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

109 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Agertz, O., & Kravtsov, A. V. 2015, ApJ, 804, 18, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/804/1/18

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/804/1/18 2015

  2. [2]

    2021, MNRAS, 503, 5826, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab322

    Agertz, O., Renaud, F., Feltzing, S., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 503, 5826, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab322

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab322 2021

  3. [3]

    S., Wechsler, R

    Behroozi, P. S., Wechsler, R. H., & Conroy, C. 2013, ApJ, 770, 57, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/770/1/57

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/770/1/57 2013

  4. [4]

    2023, MNRAS, 523, 3749, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1523

    Blaizot, J., Garel, T., Verhamme, A., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 523, 3749, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1523

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1523 2023

  5. [5]

    2021, MNRAS, 506, 5129, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1958

    Byrohl, C., Nelson, D., Behrens, C., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 506, 5129, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1958

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1958 2021

  6. [6]

    L., & Storchi-Bergmann, T

    Calzetti, D., Kinney, A. L., & Storchi-Bergmann, T. 1994, ApJ, 429, 582, doi: 10.1086/174346

    doi:10.1086/174346 1994

  7. [7]

    F., & Madau, P

    Hennawi, J. F., & Madau, P. 2014, Nature, 506, 63, doi: 10.1038/nature12898

    doi:10.1038/nature12898 2014

  8. [8]

    K., Kereˇ s, D., Hopkins, P

    Chan, T. K., Kereˇ s, D., Hopkins, P. F., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 488, 3716, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1895

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1895 2019

Show all 109 references
  1. [9]

    2024, MNRAS, 532, 2463, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1586

    Choustikov, N., Katz, H., Saxena, A., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 532, 2463, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1586

    2024 doi

  2. [10]

    2020, A&A, 638, A123, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936339 Dav´ e, R., Angl´ es-Alc´ azar, D., Narayanan, D., et al

    Dashyan, G., & Dubois, Y. 2020, A&A, 638, A123, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936339 Dav´ e, R., Angl´ es-Alc´ azar, D., Narayanan, D., et al. 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 486, 2827, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz937

    2020 doi

  3. [11]

    2024, MNRAS, 530, 52, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae837

    DeFelippis, D., Bournaud, F., Bouch´ e, N., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 530, 52, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae837

    2024 doi

  4. [12]

    2014, PASA, 31, e040, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2014.33

    Dijkstra, M. 2014, PASA, 31, e040, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2014.33

    2014 doi

  5. [13]

    2006, ApJ, 649, 14, doi: 10.1086/506243

    Dijkstra, M., Haiman, Z., & Spaans, M. 2006, ApJ, 649, 14, doi: 10.1086/506243

    2006 doi

  6. [14]

    2019, A&A, 631, A121, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936275

    Dubois, Y., Commer¸ con, B., Marcowith, A., & Brahimi, L. 2019, A&A, 631, A121, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936275

    2019 doi

  7. [15]

    2021, A&A, 651, A109, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039429 Lyman-α with CR-driven outflows 15

    Dubois, Y., Beckmann, R., Bournaud, F., et al. 2021, A&A, 651, A109, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039429 Lyman-α with CR-driven outflows 15

    2021 doi

  8. [16]

    K., Li, Z., Steidel, C

    Erb, D. K., Li, Z., Steidel, C. C., et al. 2023, ApJ, 953, 118, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acd849

    2023 doi

  9. [17]

    K., Steidel, C

    Erb, D. K., Steidel, C. C., Trainor, R. F., et al. 2014, ApJ, 795, 33, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/795/1/33

    2014 doi

  10. [18]

    2022, MNRAS, 513, 5000, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1196

    Martin-Alvarez, S. 2022, MNRAS, 513, 5000, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1196

    2022 doi

  11. [19]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2501.17239, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2501.17239

    Farcy, M., Rosdahl, J., Dubois, Y., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2501.17239, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2501.17239

    2025 doi

  12. [20]

    R., Jaskot, A

    Flury, S. R., Jaskot, A. E., Ferguson, H. C., et al. 2022, ApJ, 930, 126, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac61e4

    2022 doi

  13. [21]

    2006, A&A, 457, 371, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20065371

    Fromang, S., Hennebelle, P., & Teyssier, R. 2006, A&A, 457, 371, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20065371

    2006 doi

  14. [22]

    2024, A&A, 691, A213, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450654

    Garel, T., Michel-Dansac, L., Verhamme, A., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A213, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450654

    2024 doi

  15. [23]

    2017, MNRAS, 466, 1903, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw3209

    Gatto, A., Walch, S., Naab, T., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 466, 1903, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw3209

    2017 doi

  16. [24]

    2007, ApJ, 671, 278, doi: 10.1086/522955

    Gawiser, E., Francke, H., Lai, K., et al. 2007, ApJ, 671, 278, doi: 10.1086/522955

    2007 doi

  17. [25]

    2015, MNRAS, 448, 3248, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv251

    Geen, S., Rosdahl, J., Blaizot, J., Devriendt, J., & Slyz, A. 2015, MNRAS, 448, 3248, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv251

    2015 doi

  18. [26]

    2018, MNRAS, 479, 3042, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1653

    Girichidis, P., Naab, T., Hanasz, M., & Walch, S. 2018, MNRAS, 479, 3042, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1653

    2018 doi

  19. [27]

    2016, ApJL, 816, L19, doi: 10.3847/2041-8205/816/2/L19 G´ orski, K

    Girichidis, P., Naab, T., Walch, S., et al. 2016, ApJL, 816, L19, doi: 10.3847/2041-8205/816/2/L19 G´ orski, K. M., Hivon, E., Banday, A. J., et al. 2005, ApJ, 622, 759, doi: 10.1086/427976

    2016 doi

  20. [28]

    2015, ApJ, 812, 123, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/812/2/123

    Gronke, M., Bull, P., & Dijkstra, M. 2015, ApJ, 812, 123, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/812/2/123

    2015 doi

  21. [29]

    2016, ApJ, 826, 14, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/826/1/14

    Gronke, M., & Dijkstra, M. 2016, ApJ, 826, 14, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/826/1/14

    2016 doi

  22. [30]

    2018, ApJL, 862, L7, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aad286 Grudi´ c, M

    Gronke, M., Girichidis, P., Naab, T., & Walch, S. 2018, ApJL, 862, L7, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aad286 Grudi´ c, M. Y., Hopkins, P. F., Faucher-Gigu` ere, C.-A., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 475, 3511, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty035

    2018 doi

  23. [31]

    2024, A&A, 691, A66, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347958

    Guo, Y., Bacon, R., Wisotzki, L., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A66, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347958

    2024 doi

  24. [32]

    1996, ApJ, 461, 20, doi: 10.1086/177035

    Haardt, F., & Madau, P. 1996, ApJ, 461, 20, doi: 10.1086/177035

    1996 doi

  25. [33]

    2000, ApJL, 537, L5, doi: 10.1086/312754

    Haiman, Z., Spaans, M., & Quataert, E. 2000, ApJL, 537, L5, doi: 10.1086/312754

    2000 doi

  26. [34]

    2017, A&A, 608, A10, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731579

    Hashimoto, T., Garel, T., Guiderdoni, B., et al. 2017, A&A, 608, A10, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731579

    2017 doi

  27. [35]

    2013, ApJL, 765, L27, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/765/2/L27

    Hayes, M., ¨Ostlin, G., Schaerer, D., et al. 2013, ApJL, 765, L27, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/765/2/L27

    2013 doi

  28. [36]

    2014, A&A, 570, A81, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423392

    Hennebelle, P., & Iffrig, O. 2014, A&A, 570, A81, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423392

    2014 doi

  29. [37]

    F., Chan, T

    Hopkins, P. F., Chan, T. K., Squire, J., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 501, 3663, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3692

    2021 doi

  30. [39]

    F., Wetzel, A., Kereˇ s, D., et al

    Hopkins, P. F., Wetzel, A., Kereˇ s, D., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 800, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1690

    2018 doi

  31. [40]

    B., Smith, B

    Hummels, C. B., Smith, B. D., & Silvia, D. W. 2017, ApJ, 847, 59, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7e2d

    2017 doi

  32. [41]

    B., Smith, B

    Hummels, C. B., Smith, B. D., Hopkins, P. F., et al. 2019, ApJ, 882, 156, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab378f

    2019 doi

  33. [42]

    K., Shimizu, I., Iwata, I., & Tanaka, M

    Inoue, A. K., Shimizu, I., Iwata, I., & Tanaka, M. 2014, MNRAS, 442, 1805, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu936

    2014 doi

  34. [43]

    I., Schaerer, D., Worseck, G., et al

    Izotov, Y. I., Schaerer, D., Worseck, G., et al. 2018a, MNRAS, 474, 4514, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx3115

    doi

  35. [44]

    I., Thuan, T

    Izotov, Y. I., Thuan, T. X., Guseva, N. G., & Liss, S. E. 2018b, MNRAS, 473, 1956, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2478

    1956 doi

  36. [45]

    I., Worseck, G., Schaerer, D., et al

    Izotov, Y. I., Worseck, G., Schaerer, D., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 503, 1734, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab612

    2021 doi

  37. [46]

    I., Worseck, G., Schaerer, D., et al

    Izotov, Y. I., Worseck, G., Schaerer, D., et al. 2018c, MNRAS, 478, 4851, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1378

    doi

  38. [47]

    2021, ApJ, 908, 30, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abc2d9

    Kakiichi, K., & Gronke, M. 2021, ApJ, 908, 30, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abc2d9

    2021 doi

  39. [48]

    2025, A&A, 693, A149, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451502

    Kang, C., Kimm, T., Han, D., et al. 2025, A&A, 693, A149, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451502

    2025 doi

  40. [49]

    2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2211.04626, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2211.04626

    Katz, H., Liu, S., Kimm, T., et al. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2211.04626, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2211.04626

    2022 doi arXiv

  41. [50]

    Kim, C.-G., & Ostriker, E. C. 2018, ApJ, 853, 173, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa5ff

    2018 doi

  42. [51]

    Kim, J.-G., Gong, M., Kim, C.-G., & Ostriker, E. C. 2023, ApJS, 264, 10, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac9b1d

    2023 doi

  43. [52]

    Kim, J.-G., Kim, W.-T., & Ostriker, E. C. 2018, ApJ, 859, 68, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aabe27

    2018 doi

  44. [53]

    2022, ApJS, 259, 21, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac426d

    Kimm, T., Bieri, R., Geen, S., et al. 2022, ApJS, 259, 21, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac426d

    2022 doi

  45. [54]

    2019, MNRAS, 486, 2215, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz989

    Kimm, T., Blaizot, J., Garel, T., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 486, 2215, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz989

    2019 doi

  46. [55]

    2015, MNRAS, 451, 2900, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1211

    Kimm, T., Cen, R., Devriendt, J., Dubois, Y., & Slyz, A. 2015, MNRAS, 451, 2900, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1211

    2015 doi

  47. [56]

    2018, MNRAS, 475, 4617, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty126

    Kimm, T., Haehnelt, M., Blaizot, J., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 475, 4617, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty126

    2018 doi

  48. [57]

    2017, MNRAS, 466, 4826, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx052

    Kimm, T., Katz, H., Haehnelt, M., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 466, 4826, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx052

    2017 doi

  49. [58]

    2022, A&A, 660, A44, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142302

    Kusakabe, H., Verhamme, A., Blaizot, J., et al. 2022, A&A, 660, A44, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142302

    2022 doi

  50. [59]

    2020, MNRAS, 497, 3925, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2198

    Lao, B.-X., & Smith, A. 2020, MNRAS, 497, 3925, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2198

    2020 doi

  51. [60]

    Laursen, P., Sommer-Larsen, J., & Andersen, A. C. 2009, ApJ, 704, 1640, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/704/2/1640

    2009 doi

  52. [61]

    2017, A&A, 608, A8, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731480

    Leclercq, F., Bacon, R., Wisotzki, L., et al. 2017, A&A, 608, A8, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731480

    2017 doi

  53. [62]

    Y., & Gnedin, N

    Li, H., Gnedin, O. Y., & Gnedin, N. Y. 2018, ApJ, 861, 107, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aac9b8 16 Taysun Kimm et al

    2018 doi

  54. [63]

    2020, MNRAS, 495, 4475, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1438

    Martin-Alvarez, S., Slyz, A., Devriendt, J., & G´ omez-Guijarro, C. 2020, MNRAS, 495, 4475, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1438

    2020 doi

  55. [64]

    2021, MNRAS, 505, 1382, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1304

    Matthee, J., Sobral, D., Hayes, M., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 505, 1382, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1304

    2021 doi

  56. [65]

    2021, A&A, 646, A80, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039449

    Mauerhofer, V., Verhamme, A., Blaizot, J., et al. 2021, A&A, 646, A80, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039449

    2021 doi

  57. [66]

    2020, A&A, 635, A154, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834961

    Michel-Dansac, L., Blaizot, J., Garel, T., et al. 2020, A&A, 635, A154, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834961

    2020 doi

  58. [67]

    D., Blaizot, J., Cadiou, C., et al

    Mitchell, P. D., Blaizot, J., Cadiou, C., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 501, 5757, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab035

    2021 doi

  59. [68]

    Murray, N., Quataert, E., & Thompson, T. A. 2005, ApJ, 618, 569, doi: 10.1086/426067

    2005 doi

  60. [69]

    Naab, T., & Ostriker, J. P. 2017, ARA&A, 55, 59, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-040019

    2017 doi

  61. [70]

    P., Matthee, J., Oesch, P

    Naidu, R. P., Matthee, J., Oesch, P. A., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 510, 4582, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3601

    2022 doi

  62. [71]

    2025, MNRAS, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf038

    Nebrin, O., Smith, A., Lorinc, K., et al. 2025, MNRAS, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf038

    2025 doi

  63. [72]

    2019, MNRAS, 490, 3234, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2306 Nu˜ nez-Casti˜ neyra, A., Grenier, I

    Nelson, D., Pillepich, A., Springel, V., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 490, 3234, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2306 Nu˜ nez-Casti˜ neyra, A., Grenier, I. A., Bournaud, F., et al. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2205.08163, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2205.08163 Orlitov´ a, I., Verhamme, A., Henry, A., et ...

    2019 doi arXiv

  64. [73]

    B., Angl´ es-Alc´ azar, D., et al

    Pandya, V., Fielding, D. B., Angl´ es-Alc´ azar, D., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 508, 2979, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2714

    2021 doi

  65. [74]

    S., Corlies, L., Tumlinson, J., et al

    Peeples, M. S., Corlies, L., Tumlinson, J., et al. 2019, ApJ, 873, 129, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab0654

    2019 doi

  66. [75]

    2018, MNRAS, 473, 4077, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2656

    Pillepich, A., Springel, V., Nelson, D., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 473, 4077, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2656

    2018 doi

  67. [76]

    C., Slyz, A., & Devriendt, J

    Powell, L. C., Slyz, A., & Devriendt, J. 2011, MNRAS, 414, 3671, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18668.x

    2011

  68. [77]

    X., Werk, J

    Prochaska, J. X., Werk, J. K., Worseck, G., et al. 2017, ApJ, 837, 169, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6007

    2017 doi

  69. [78]

    2008, ApJ, 681, 856, doi: 10.1086/525846

    Rauch, M., Haehnelt, M., Bunker, A., et al. 2008, ApJ, 681, 856, doi: 10.1086/525846

    2008 doi

  70. [79]

    2024, MNRAS, 528, 5412, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae388

    Slyz, A. 2024, MNRAS, 528, 5412, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae388

    2024 doi

  71. [80]

    E., Hayes, M., ¨Ostlin, G., et al

    Rivera-Thorsen, T. E., Hayes, M., ¨Ostlin, G., et al. 2015, ApJ, 805, 14, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/805/1/14 Rodr ´ ıguez Montero, F., Martin-Alvarez, S., Slyz, A., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 530, 3617, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1083

    2015 doi

  72. [81]

    B., Tchernyshyov, K., et al

    Roman-Duval, J., Jenkins, E. B., Tchernyshyov, K., et al. 2022, ApJ, 928, 90, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5248

    2022 doi

  73. [82]

    2013, MNRAS, 436, 2188, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1722

    Rosdahl, J., Blaizot, J., Aubert, D., Stranex, T., & Teyssier, R. 2013, MNRAS, 436, 2188, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1722

    2013 doi

  74. [83]

    2015, astro-ph/1501.04632

    Rosdahl, J., Schaye, J., Teyssier, R., & Agertz, O. 2015, astro-ph/1501.04632. http://ascl.net/1501.04632

    2015 arXiv

  75. [84]

    2018, MNRAS, 479, 994, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1655

    Rosdahl, J., Katz, H., Blaizot, J., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 479, 994, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1655

    2018 doi

  76. [85]

    2021, PASP, 133, 034507, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/abe3ca

    Runnholm, A., Gronke, M., & Hayes, M. 2021, PASP, 133, 034507, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/abe3ca

    2021 doi

  77. [86]

    Ruszkowski, M., Yang, H. Y. K., & Zweibel, E. 2017, ApJ, 834, 208, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/834/2/208

    2017 doi

  78. [87]

    Salem, M., & Bryan, G. L. 2014, MNRAS, 437, 3312, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt2121

    2014 doi

  79. [88]

    S., et al

    Saxena, A., Pentericci, L., Ellis, R. S., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 511, 120, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3728

    2022 doi

  80. [89]

    A., Kravtsov, A

    Semenov, V. A., Kravtsov, A. V., & Caprioli, D. 2021, ApJ, 910, 126, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abe2a6

    2021 doi

  81. [90]

    2020, ApJS, 250, 9, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aba2d6

    Seon, K.-i., & Kim, C.-G. 2020, ApJS, 250, 9, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aba2d6

    2020 doi

  82. [91]

    A., & Ostriker, E

    Skinner, M. A., & Ostriker, E. C. 2015, ApJ, 809, 187, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/809/2/187

    2015 doi

  83. [92]

    2017, MNRAS, 464, 2963, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2591

    Smith, A., Bromm, V., & Loeb, A. 2017, MNRAS, 464, 2963, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2591

    2017 doi

  84. [93]

    2022, MNRAS, 512, 3243, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac713

    Smith, A., Kannan, R., Garaldi, E., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 512, 3243, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac713

    2022 doi

  85. [94]

    2019, MNRAS, 484, 39, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty3483

    Smith, A., Ma, X., Bromm, V., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 484, 39, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty3483

    2019 doi

  86. [95]

    Song, H., Seon, K.-I., & Hwang, H. S. 2020, ApJ, 901, 41, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abac02

    2020 doi

  87. [96]

    R., Eldridge, J

    Stanway, E. R., Eldridge, J. J., & Becker, G. D. 2016, MNRAS, 456, 485, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2661

    2016 doi

  88. [97]

    C., Bogosavljevi´ c, M., Shapley, A

    Steidel, C. C., Bogosavljevi´ c, M., Shapley, A. E., et al. 2011, ApJ, 736, 160, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/736/2/160

    2011 doi

  89. [98]

    C., Erb, D

    Steidel, C. C., Erb, D. K., Shapley, A. E., et al. 2010, ApJ, 717, 289, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/717/1/289

    2010 doi

  90. [99]

    2019, MNRAS, 483, 4040, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty3402

    Hernquist, L. 2019, MNRAS, 483, 4040, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty3402

    2019 doi

  91. [100]

    2002, A&A, 385, 337, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20011817

    Teyssier, R. 2002, A&A, 385, 337, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20011817

    2002 doi

  92. [101]

    F., Steidel, C

    Trainor, R. F., Steidel, C. C., Strom, A. L., & Rudie, G. C. 2015, ApJ, 809, 89, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/809/1/89

    2015 doi

  93. [102]

    2005, ARA&A, 43, 769, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.43.072103.150610

    Veilleux, S., Cecil, G., & Bland-Hawthorn, J. 2005, ARA&A, 43, 769, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.43.072103.150610

    2005 arXiv

  94. [103]

    2015, A&A, 578, A7, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423978

    Verhamme, A., Orlitov´ a, I., Schaerer, D., & Hayes, M. 2015, A&A, 578, A7, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423978

    2015 doi

  95. [104]

    2017, A&A, 597, A13, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629264

    Verhamme, A., Orlitov´ a, I., Schaerer, D., et al. 2017, A&A, 597, A13, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629264

    2017 doi

  96. [105]

    2006, A&A, 460, 397, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20065554

    Verhamme, A., Schaerer, D., & Maselli, A. 2006, A&A, 460, 397, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20065554

    2006 doi

  97. [106]

    K., Prochaska, J

    Werk, J. K., Prochaska, J. X., Thom, C., et al. 2013, ApJS, 204, 17, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/204/2/17

    2013 doi

  98. [107]

    2016, A&A, 587, A98, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527384

    Wisotzki, L., Bacon, R., Blaizot, J., et al. 2016, A&A, 587, A98, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527384

    2016 doi

  99. [108]

    2018, Nature, 562, 229, doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0564-6 Lyman-α with CR-driven outflows 17

    Wisotzki, L., Bacon, R., Brinchmann, J., et al. 2018, Nature, 562, 229, doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0564-6 Lyman-α with CR-driven outflows 17

    2018 doi

  100. [109]

    2016, ApJ, 820, 130, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/820/2/130

    Yang, H., Malhotra, S., Gronke, M., et al. 2016, ApJ, 820, 130, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/820/2/130

    2016 doi

  101. [110]

    2024, MNRAS, 532, 3643, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1606

    Sijacki, D. 2024, MNRAS, 532, 3643, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1606

    2024 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.