Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 63 references

Transition radiation in dusty novae with non-thermal radio emission

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Transition radiation produced when nova electrons cross dust grains can match the supersoft X-ray source and shape the ejecta's ionisation and heat balance.

desk verdict A well-grounded exploratory idea undermined by a fixable but load-bearing misuse of the χ≫1 asymptotic; the corrected integral drops the fiducial TR flux below the supersoft comparison. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.11286 v1 pith:ANA2F3T4 submitted 2025-07-15 astro-ph.SR

A. Evans This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SR
keywords transitionradiationdustynovaesynchrotronnon-thermalradioemissionX-rayionisationbalancegrainheatingsupernovaremnants
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Transition radiation is emitted when a relativistic charged particle crosses the boundary between two media with different dielectric properties. This paper argues that in dusty novae that also show non-thermal radio synchrotron emission, the relativistic electrons responsible for the radio will cross dust grains and produce transition radiation in the hard ultraviolet and X-ray range. Scaling the electron population from the observed radio flux, the paper estimates a transition-radiation spectral luminosity at 30 Å of roughly $\sim 6\times 10^{15}\,\mathrm{erg\,s^{-1}\,Hz^{-1}}$ for a representative nova, comparable to the luminosity of the supersoft X-ray source during the supersoft phase. The paper concludes that even when transition radiation is too faint to detect directly, it can affect the ionisation balance of the ejecta and heat the dust, potentially contributing to the 'isothermal' dust phase in which grain temperatures rise after about 50–100 days, and that the same mechanism may operate in other dusty non-thermal sources such as supernova remnants.

What carries the argument

The central object is transition radiation, the radiation emitted when a relativistic electron enters or leaves a dust grain, crossing the boundary between media of different dielectric permeability. The calculation is carried by the spectral formula $dI/d\omega = (4e^2/c)T(\chi)$ with $\chi = \omega/(\gamma\omega_p)$, where $\omega_p$ is the grain plasma frequency; TR is produced only when the grain radius exceeds the formation-zone critical radius $a_{\mathrm{crit}} = c\gamma/(2\omega_p)$, which confines the emission to a wedge in the grain-size versus electron-energy plane. The electron population is normalised to the measured optically-thin synchrotron flux density, and the TR luminosity is obtained by integrating the cross-section $\sigma(a) = \pi a^2[1-(\Lambda/2a)^2]$ over the grain size distribution, yielding the scaling used for the final estimates.

What would settle it

A deep X-ray spectrum of a dusty nova with detected non-thermal radio emission, taken at the time of the dust minimum, either shows a short-wavelength excess above the supersoft blackbody at the level predicted by the paper's Equation (24) with $K \approx 1$, or it does not; a null result would force the electron–dust overlap volume to be far smaller than assumed.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that transition radiation is a natural, previously unexplored consequence of the coexistence of dust and relativistic electrons in nova ejecta, and that its luminosity can be derived directly from the observed non-thermal radio flux density without new free parameters beyond the dust mass, grain size distribution, plasma frequency, and the overlap volume. Working from the standard transition-radiation formula and the standard optically-thin synchrotron formalism, the paper shows that the transition-radiation luminosity scales as $[L_\nu]_{\mathrm{TR}} \propto a_2^{4-\delta}(\omega_p/\omega)^4/r_g^3$ and, for fiducial parameters, reaches $\sim 6\times 10^{15}\,\mathrm{erg\,s^{-1}\,Hz^{-1}}$ at 30 Å. At this level the transition radiation is comparable to the supersoft-phase luminosity of the remnant, and the paper proposes that it is a plausible agent for ejecta ionisation, grain heating, and the observed rise in dust temperature late in the eruption.

Load-bearing premise

The estimate assumes the relativistic electrons and the dust occupy substantially the same volume and that the grains are large enough to host the radiation's formation zone; if the overlap is small or the grains are too small, the predicted flux collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The TR component is brightest at the shortest wavelengths, scaling as $(\omega_p/\omega)^4$, so it should appear as a hard ultraviolet/soft X-ray excess rather than a broadband bump.
  • During the supersoft phase TR can rival the stellar remnant's emission at short wavelengths; once the supersoft phase ends, TR could become the dominant source of hard radiation in the ejecta.
  • Even if TR is never directly detected, the paper argues it can alter the ionisation balance of the ejecta and heat grains, potentially explaining the isothermal dust phase when dust temperature rises after roughly 50–100 days.
  • The same mechanism is predicted to operate in other dusty environments with non-thermal radio emission, such as the Crab Nebula and the extremely dusty proto-planetary nebula V4334 Sgr (Sakurai's Object).

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The strong $(\omega_p/\omega)^4$ wavelength dependence means the best observational test is a narrow-band X-ray search at 10–100 Å specifically timed to the dust-minimum phase, rather than a broadband photometric survey.
  • The scaling from radio to TR could be inverted: a measured TR flux constrains the volume overlap between electrons and dust, a quantity the paper notes is otherwise not easily quantifiable.
  • If TR contributes to grain heating, the dust temperature evolution of a dusty nova should track the non-thermal radio light curve, a correlation that can be checked with existing multi-epoch infrared and radio datasets.
  • The role of TR is not confined to novae; any dusty, shock-powered source with radio-synchrotron electrons, for instance gamma-ray binaries or young supernova remnants, could harbour a similar hard-ultraviolet component, with the band set by the grain plasma frequency.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper argues that transition radiation (TR) from relativistic electrons crossing dust grains in dusty novae with non-thermal radio emission can be significant. The authors derive an analytic estimate of the TR luminosity by scaling from the observed synchrotron flux, using the chi >> 1 asymptotic form of the TR spectral function. They find a fiducial TR luminosity at 30 Å that is comparable to supersoft-source emission and conclude that TR may affect the ionization balance and grain heating in nova ejecta, and possibly be detectable with future X-ray facilities. The paper also suggests applications to other dusty environments such as supernova remnants and proto-planetary nebulae.

Significance. If the quantitative estimates were correct, the paper would identify a new, potentially important coupling between synchrotron-emitting electron populations and dust in novae and other astrophysical sources. The manuscript is transparent in its derivation, uses standard formulas, and explicitly acknowledges major uncertainties such as Vcom/Ve and grain size. It does not attempt to fit the TR prediction to observations, so circularity is not a concern. However, the central quantitative claim is weakened by a serious approximation error in the evaluation of the energy integral, and the correct treatment of the low-energy electron population is not established. The physical idea remains plausible, but the numerical conclusions as presented are not supported.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.2, Eq. (16) and Eq. (17)] Equation (16) replaces T(chi) with its chi >> 1 asymptotic form and integrates it over electron energies down to E1 = 0. The stated validity condition in Eq. (17) is incomplete because it omits the gamma dependence of chi. At lambda = 30 Å, omega/omega_p = 33.6, so chi = 33.6/gamma. The condition chi > 4.5 therefore requires gamma < 7.5, while the integration in Eq. (16) extends to gamma_2 = 670. The bulk of the integration domain has chi < 1, where Equation (3) overestimates T(chi) by orders of magnitude. A numerical evaluation for beta = 2.5, delta = 2 gives an exact-to-approximate ratio R ~ 2e-3, so Eq. (23) overestimates [L_nu]_TR at 30 Å by about a factor of 500. The corrected fiducial value is ~1e13 erg s^-1 Hz^-1, which is below the supersoft-source values 1.5e14 to 3.6e16 erg s^-1 Hz^-1 quoted in Section 3.3.2. The K=1 curve in Fig. 4 is therefore not representative, and the comparison with the supersoft source is not supported by the fiducial parameters. The calculation should be redone with the full T(chi) or with the explicit restriction gamma < 7.5, and the resulting figures and conclusions should be recomputed.
  2. [Section 3.2, Eq. (18) and Appendix A] The assumption E1 = 0 is not physically justified by the discussion in Appendix A. The appendix shows only that a term proportional to (E1/E2)^(5-delta) is small if E1 << E2 and delta < 5; it does not demonstrate that electrons with gamma near unity exist with the assumed power-law normalization. After correcting the asymptotic error, the 30 Å TR emission is dominated by the low-energy end, around gamma of order 5 to 10, which is very different from the gamma ~ 180 electrons that produce the 1 GHz synchrotron flux used for normalization. If the low-energy electron population has a cutoff at, say, gamma ~ 10, the 30 Å TR luminosity is reduced by orders of magnitude. The authors should treat E1 as an uncertain parameter and show the sensitivity of the result to its value.
  3. [Section 3.3.1, Eq. (24) and Fig. 4] After correction, the K parameter is no longer centered near 1; the fiducial estimate corresponds to K ~ 2e-3, not K = 1. The claim that TR may be comparable to the supersoft source in some cases then rests entirely on the upper end of the stated +/-3 dex uncertainty range. That may be possible, but a concrete example or physical argument picking out the upper range would be needed. As written, the conclusion that TR is 'likely to have significant effects' is anchored to an overestimated fiducial value, and the stated parameter range masks the systematic correction rather than quantifying it.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 4] The heading contains a typo: 'CONCUDING REMARKS' should be 'CONCLUDING REMARKS'.
  2. [Section 2] The word 'dielectic' in the first paragraph should be 'dielectric'.
  3. [References] The reference to Sokoloski et al. 2022 (ATel 15150) does not appear to be cited in the body of the paper; please add a citation or remove the reference.
  4. [Figure 2] The label 'a1' in the figure is easily confused with the critical radius line; clarifying the caption would help the reader follow the integration limits in Eq. (16).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the TR luminosity follows from a forward scaling of an observed synchrotron flux with independently motivated physical parameters.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. Equation (14) uses an observed or representative synchrotron flux density to normalize the relativistic electron population, and Equation (15) integrates the textbook transition-radiation spectrum over grain size and electron energy with explicit geometric factors: formation zone, effective cross-section, and the two-interface factor. Equation (18) combines these into a forward expression for the TR luminosity; no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and the final result is not used to set any of the input constants. The comparison with the supersoft source in Section 3.3.2 is an order-of-magnitude estimate, explicitly bracketed by the K parameter and by acknowledged uncertainties in Vcom/Ve. The paper does cite the author's prior work for empirical inputs, such as dust masses and grain-size power-law exponents, but these are observational parameters, not results that presuppose the TR conclusion; the physically load-bearing formulas come from external references (Jackson 1999, Pacholczyk 1970, Chevalier 1998). There is no imported uniqueness theorem, no ansatz smuggled in through a self-citation, and no renaming of a known result. The numerical concern identified in the skeptic's analysis, that the chi >> 1 asymptotic is applied over an integration range containing chi < 1 electrons, is a domain-of-validity or correctness issue in Equations (16)-(17), not a circular dependency: it does not make the stated prediction equivalent to the inputs by construction. Therefore no circular step is found; the paper merits a low circularity score despite that separate modeling caveat.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The estimate is an order-of-magnitude calculation built on standard electrodynamics and observed radio and dust properties of novae. No new entities are introduced. The dominant uncertainties are the adopted parameters, especially the overlap volume, and the use of the asymptotic T(chi) outside its range of validity, which is flagged as an ad hoc assumption.

free parameters (8)
  • Mg (total dust mass) = 50e-8 Msun
    Adopted from typical nova dust masses cited from Evans & Gehrz 2025; enters Equation (18) linearly.
  • a2 (maximum grain radius) = 10 µm
    Representative large grain radius; the TR flux scales as a2^(4-delta), making this a dominant parameter.
  • rg (dust shell radius) = 4.3e14 cm
    Distance travelled by 500 km/s ejecta in 100 days; the TR flux scales as rg^-3.
  • B (magnetic field) = 10 mG
    Inferred from RS Oph synchrotron emission; used to convert the synchrotron flux to n0Ve via Equation (14).
  • delta (electron energy index) = 2.0
    Chosen to give a radio spectral index alpha=0.5; P0 and c5(delta) depend on it.
  • beta (grain size distribution index) = 2.5
    Adopted from the V705 Cas dust size distribution; used in the P0 function.
  • phi (filling factor) and Vcom/Ve = 1
    Assumed maximum overlap between the dust and synchrotron-emitting volumes; the text acknowledges these are not easily quantifiable.
  • Representative synchrotron flux density = 10 mJy at 1 GHz at 1 kpc
    Canonical value used to normalize the relativistic electron population via Equation (14).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Jackson's single-interface transition radiation formula (Equation 1) applies to electrons crossing a spherical dust grain, and the two interfaces (entry and exit) add incoherently, giving a factor 2.
    The paper doubles Equation (1) to get Equation (8) following Gurzadyan (1973); interference, grain shape, and surface charging are neglected, which is acceptable only for order-of-magnitude work.
  • domain assumption Electron and grain size distributions are single power laws (Equations 10 and 13).
    Adopted from observed nova dust (beta about 2.3 for V705 Cas) and standard synchrotron spectral index mapping delta=2alpha+1; real distributions may have breaks.
  • ad hoc to paper The chi much greater than 1 asymptotic T(chi) approximately 1/(6 chi^4) can be used in the frequency integral (Equation 16) over electron energies that include chi less than 1.
    The paper states the approximation is valid for chi > 4.5 and derives a wavelength limit (Equation 17), but Equation (16) is integrated over gamma from E1=0 upward, so a large fraction of the electron population has chi < 4.5 at 30 Å; the resulting error is not quantified.
  • standard math Setting E1=0 is a good approximation for delta < 5 and E1 much less than E2.
    Appendix A derives the neglected term proportional to (E1/E2)^(5-delta), which is small for the radio spectral indices considered.
  • domain assumption The supersoft source can be represented by an Eddington-luminosity black body of kT = 15 to 20 eV.
    Used in Equation (26) and Figure 4 for comparison; real soft X-ray spectra are not perfect black bodies and depend on white dwarf mass and distance.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Transition radiation in dusty novae with non-thermal radio emission." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ANA2F3T4

@misc{pith2026250711286,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Transition radiation in dusty novae with non-thermal radio emission},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ANA2F3T4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.11286}
}
read the original abstract

Transition radiation is produced when a relativistic charged particle enters or leaves a solid medium. The electrons that produce synchrotron radiation may interact with the dust in circumstellar environments, leading to the emission of transition radiation. We explore the production of transition radiation in dusty novae that also display synchrotron radiation emission. Transition radiation is emitted in the hard ultra-violet/X-ray range. We suggest that, even when the transition radiation is not itself directly observable, it may have a role in determining the ionisation balance of, and grain heating in, nova ejecta. Furthermore, it may be important in other dusty environments (such as supernova remnants) with non-thermal radio emission.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.11286 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Spectral energy distribution of TR as a function of χ = ω/[γωp]. The two broken red curves are for the limiting cases χ ≪ 1 and χ ≫ 1. See text for details. 2 TRANSITION RADIATION TR is produced when a charged particle crosses the bound￾ary between two media having different dielectic permeabil￾ities, for example, an electron moving into, or out of, a solid medium (see Jackson 1999, for details). It is routinely use… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The function P0(β, δ) as a function of δ for represen￾tative values of β. See text. P0 diverges, and may even be negative, for some combina￾tions of β and δ, but the values in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Comparison between TR (red) and UV/X-ray emission (black) during the supersoft phase. Curves are labelled by value of K (see text for explanation of this parameter) and black body temperature of the supersoft source, expressed in eV. leaves a dust particle, in nova environments. While the di￾rect detection of transition radiation from dusty novae may be marginal at present, it may be detectable with future fa￾ciliti… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTION or pop #1...

  2. [2]

    P., 2012, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research: Section A, 666, 130

    Andronic A., Wessels J. P., 2012, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research: Section A, 666, 130

    work page 2012

  3. [3]

    Babul A.-N., et al., 2022, MNRAS, 515, 3028

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    Banerjee D. P. K., Srivastava M. K., Ashok N. M., Venkataraman V., 2016, MNRAS, 455, L109

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    Banerjee D. P. K., et al., 2023a, ApJ, 952, L26

    work page

  6. [6]

    Banerjee D. P. K., et al., 2023b, ApJ, 954, L16

    work page

  7. [7]

    F., Evans A., 1983, MNRAS, 203, 285

    Bode M. F., Evans A., 1983, MNRAS, 203, 285

    work page 1983

  8. [8]

    F., Evans A., Whittet D

    Bode M. F., Evans A., Whittet D. C. B., Aitken D. K., Roche P. F., Whitmore B., 1984, MNRAS, 207, 897

    work page 1984

Show all 63 references
  1. [9]

    F., Evans A., 2012, editors, Classical Novae, second edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Bode M. F., Evans A., 2012, editors, Classical Novae, second edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    2012

  2. [10]

    F., O'Brien T

    Bode M. F., O'Brien T. J., 2012, in Classical Novae, eds M. F. Bode, A. Evans, second edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    2012

  3. [11]

    E., 2021, MNRAS, 505, 568

    Bowey J. E., 2021, MNRAS, 505, 568

    2021

  4. [12]

    E., Hofmeister A

    Bowey J. E., Hofmeister A. M., 2022, MNRAS, 513, 1774

    2022

  5. [13]

    A., 1998, ApJ, 499, 810

    Chevalier R. A., 1998, ApJ, 499, 810

    1998

  6. [14]

    Chomiuk L., et al., 2021a, ApJS, 257, 49

  7. [15]

    D., Chen K

    Chomiuk L., Metzger B. D., Chen K. J., 2021b, ARAA, 59,391

  8. [16]

    Chong A., et al., 2025, MNRAS, in press (arXiv:2501.04098)

    2025 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Cruise M., et al., 2024, Nature Ast., https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-024-02416-3

    2024 doi

  10. [18]

    M., Metzger B

    Derdzinski A. M., Metzger B. D., Lazzati D., 2017, MNRAS, 469, 1314

    2017

  11. [19]

    M., Rowlinson A., Wijers R

    de Ruiter I., Nyamai M. M., Rowlinson A., Wijers R. A. M. J., O'Brien T. J., Williams D. R. A., Woudt P., 2023, MNRAS, 523, 132

    2023

  12. [20]

    J., et al., 2021, ApJ, 922, L42

    Drake J. J., et al., 2021, ApJ, 922, L42

    2021

  13. [21]

    W., Seahra S., 1998, ApJ, 507, 874

    Duley W. W., Seahra S., 1998, ApJ, 507, 874

    1998

  14. [22]

    Evans A., et al., 2005, MNRAS, 360, 1483

    2005

  15. [23]

    Evans A., et al., 2007, ApJ, 671, L157

    2007

  16. [24]

    D., 2012, BASI, 40, 213

    Evans A., Gehrz R. D., 2012, BASI, 40, 213

    2012

  17. [25]

    Evans A., Rawlings J. M. C., 2012, in Classical Novae, eds M. F. Bode, A. Evans, second edition, p. 308, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    2012

  18. [26]

    Evans A., et al., 2017, MNRAS, 466, 4221

    2017

  19. [27]

    Evans A., et al., 2022, MNRAS, 511, 713

    2022

  20. [28]

    D., 2025, in Presolar Grains in Extra-Terrestrial Materials, ed S

    Evans A., Gehrz R. D., 2025, in Presolar Grains in Extra-Terrestrial Materials, ed S. Amari, Chapter 10, Elsevier (arXiv:2211.12410)

    2025 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Evans A., et al., 2023, MNRAS, 522, 4841

    2023

  22. [30]

    Evans A., Banerjee D. P. K., Varricatt W. P., Joshi V., 2024, MNRAS, 531, 728

    2024

  23. [31]

    Finzell T., et al., 2018, ApJ, 852, 108

    2018

  24. [32]

    D., Ney E

    Gehrz R. D., Ney E. P., Grasdalen G. L., Hackwell J. A., Thronson H. A., 1984 ApJ, 281, 303

    1984

  25. [33]

    D., Truran J

    Gehrz R. D., Truran J. W., Williams R. E., Starrfield S., 1998, PASP, 110, 3

    1998

  26. [34]

    D., 2012, in Classical Novae, eds M

    Gehrz R. D., 2012, in Classical Novae, eds M. F. Bode, A. Evans, second edition, p. 167, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    2012

  27. [35]

    D., et al., 2015, ApJ, 812, 132

    Gehrz R. D., et al., 2015, ApJ, 812, 132

    2015

  28. [36]

    D., et al., 2018, ApJ, 858, 78

    Gehrz R. D., et al., 2018, ApJ, 858, 78

    2018

  29. [37]

    A., 1973, A&A, 28, 147

    Gurzadyan G. A., 1973, A&A, 28, 147

    1973

  30. [38]

    A., 1974, A&A, 33, 307

    Gurzadyan G. A., 1974, A&A, 33, 307

    1974

  31. [39]

    Hajduk et al., 2024, A&A, 688, L21

    2024

  32. [40]

    A., et al., 2010, AJ, 140, 1347

    Helton L. A., et al., 2010, AJ, 140, 1347

    2010

  33. [41]

    D., 1999, Classical Electrodynamics, third edition, J

    Jackson J. D., 1999, Classical Electrodynamics, third edition, J. Wiley & Sons, New York, Chichester,

    1999

  34. [42]

    Johansson S. A. E., 1971, Astrophys. Letts., 9, 143

    1971

  35. [43]

    Kaminsky B., et al., 2022, MNRAS, 517, 6064

    2022

  36. [44]

    Lerche I., 1972, ApJ, 175, 373

    1972

  37. [45]

    M., Evans A., 1984, MNRAS, 209, 945

    Mitchell R. M., Evans A., 1984, MNRAS, 209, 945

    1984

  38. [46]

    M., Henden A., Dallaporta S., Finzell T., Chomiuk L., 2015, IBVS, \#6139

    Munari U., Walter F. M., Henden A., Dallaporta S., Finzell T., Chomiuk L., 2015, IBVS, \#6139

    2015

  39. [47]

    Ness J.-U., et al., 2022, A&A, 658, A169

    2022

  40. [48]

    M., Chomiuk L., Ribeiro V

    Nyamai M. M., Chomiuk L., Ribeiro V. A. M., Woudt P. A., Strader J., Sokolovsky K. V., 2021, MNRAS, 501, 1394

    2021

  41. [49]

    M., Linford J

    Nyamai M. M., Linford J. D., Allison J. A., Chomiuk L., Woudt P. A., Ribeiro V. A. M., Sarbadhicary S. K., 2023, MNRAS, 523, 1661

    2023

  42. [50]

    G., 1970, Radio Astrophysics, W

    Pacholczyk A. G., 1970, Radio Astrophysics, W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco

    1970

  43. [51]

    D., 1972, Astrophys

    Ramaty R., Bleach R. D., 1972, Astrophys. Letts., 11, 35

    1972

  44. [52]

    P., Mioduszewski A

    Rupen M. P., Mioduszewski A. J., Sokoloski J. L.. 2008, ApJ. 688, 559

    2008

  45. [53]

    T., Woodward C

    Rushton M. T., Woodward C. E., Gehrz R. D., Evans A., Kaminsky B., Pavlenko Ya. V., Eyres S. P. S., 2022, MNRAS, 517, 2526

    2022

  46. [54]

    Sokoloski K., et al., 2022, ATel\#15150

    2022

  47. [55]

    L., Rupen M

    Sokoloski J. L., Rupen M. P., Mioduszewski A.J., 2008, ApJ, 685, L137

    2008

  48. [56]

    Dwek E., Arendt R

    Temim T., Sonneborn G. Dwek E., Arendt R. G., Gehrz R. D., Slane P., Roellog T. L., 2012, ApJ, 753, 72

    2012

  49. [57]

    D., 1973, ApJ, 182, 17

    Watson W. D., 1973, ApJ, 182, 17

    1973

  50. [58]

    Weston J. H. S., et al., 2016, MNRAS, 457, 887

    2016

  51. [59]

    M., Bildsten L., Brooks J., Paxton B., 2013, ApJ, 777, 136

    Wolf W. M., Bildsten L., Brooks J., Paxton B., 2013, ApJ, 777, 136

    2013

  52. [60]

    E., Gehrz R

    Woodward C. E., Gehrz R. D., Jones T. J., Lawrence G. F., 1992, ApJ, 384, L41

    1992

  53. [61]

    E., Helton L

    Woodward C. E., Helton L. A., Evans A., van Loon J. Th., 2008, in RS Ophiuchi (2006) and the Recurrent Nova Phenomenon, eds A. Evans, M. F. Bode, T. J. O'Brien, M. J. Darnley, ASP Conference Series, Vol. 401, p. 260, Astronomical Society of the Pacific, San Francisco

    2006

  54. [62]

    A., et al., 2009, MNRAS, 706, 738

    Woudt P. A., et al., 2009, MNRAS, 706, 738

    2009

  55. [63]

    B., Artru X., Ramaty R., 1973, ApJ., 181, 725

    Yodh G. B., Artru X., Ramaty R., 1973, ApJ., 181, 725

    1973

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.