pith. sign in

arxiv: 2507.11308 · v2 · submitted 2025-07-15 · ❄️ cond-mat.dis-nn · cond-mat.quant-gas

Localization Transition for Interacting Quantum Particles in Colored-Noise Disorder

Giacomo Morpurgo , Laurent Sanchez-Palencia , Thierry Giamarchi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 04:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.dis-nn cond-mat.quant-gas
keywords localization transitioninteracting particlescolored noiseone-dimensional systemsrenormalization groupbackward scatteringquantum localization
0
0 comments X

The pith

In colored-noise disorder, the localization transition for interacting particles shifts to the non-interacting point.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies interacting quantum particles moving in a one-dimensional disorder whose correlations are chosen to allow backward scattering to vanish. Two separate renormalization-group calculations produce a phase diagram in which the boundary between localized and extended states sits exactly at zero interaction strength, unlike the finite attractive interaction required for white-noise disorder. Numerical checks confirm that the localization length scales with disorder strength in a manner distinct from the conventional localized regime. This result follows directly from the suppression of backward scattering, which alters the relevant scaling operators under renormalization.

Core claim

Applying two renormalization group procedures to interacting particles in one-dimensional correlated disorder that permits vanishing backward scattering yields a phase diagram in which the localization transition occurs at the non-interacting point rather than at finite attractive interaction; numerical data further show that the localization length scales with disorder strength differently from the usual localized-phase form.

What carries the argument

Colored-noise disorder permitting vanishing backward scattering, treated by two renormalization group procedures that determine the flow of interaction and disorder couplings.

If this is right

  • Any repulsive interaction immediately places the system in the localized phase at the transition point.
  • The localization length exhibits a non-standard power-law dependence on disorder amplitude.
  • The phase boundary in the interaction-disorder plane intersects the non-interacting axis.
  • Transport observables such as conductance are controlled by the modified scaling dimensions arising from absent backward scattering.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Experiments with engineered noise spectra in cold-atom chains or quantum wires could test whether the transition indeed occurs at zero interaction.
  • The same vanishing-backward-scattering mechanism may appear in other one-dimensional models with long-range correlated potentials.
  • Extension to finite temperature or to two-particle entanglement could reveal additional signatures of the shifted transition.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen disorder correlations make backward scattering processes vanish completely.

What would settle it

Compute or measure the localization length at exactly zero interaction strength and verify whether its scaling with increasing disorder strength deviates from the conventional localized-phase exponent.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.11308 by Giacomo Morpurgo, Laurent Sanchez-Palencia, Thierry Giamarchi.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Bosonized RG procedure, as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Phase diagrams. (a) Sketch of the phase diagram versus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Localization length [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Diagrams contributing to the renormalization of interactions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Localization length [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the localization transition of interacting particles in a one-dimensional correlated disorder system. The disorder which we investigate allows for vanishing backwards scattering processes. We derive by two renormalization group procedures its phase diagram and predict that the localization transition point is shifted from finite attractive interaction to the non-interacting point. We finally show numerically that the scaling of the localization length with the disorder strength deviates from the usual scaling of a localized phase.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines the localization transition for interacting particles in one-dimensional systems subject to colored-noise disorder that permits vanishing backward scattering. The authors apply two renormalization group procedures to construct the phase diagram, concluding that the localization transition is shifted to the non-interacting point. Numerical evidence is provided indicating that the localization length scales differently with disorder strength compared to standard localized phases.

Significance. Should the central claim be substantiated, the result would highlight how particular forms of disorder correlations can suppress backward scattering even in the interacting regime, leading to a modified phase diagram for the localization transition. The dual RG approach and numerical scaling analysis represent strengths, but additional details on the derivations and checks for operator generation are needed to fully evaluate the significance.

major comments (2)
  1. The justification for applying the two RG procedures rests on the vanishing of backward scattering processes due to the colored-noise disorder. However, the interacting case may generate finite backward scattering at higher orders. An explicit demonstration that the noise spectrum remains orthogonal to backward channels after including the interaction vertex is required as this underpins the shift of the transition point to the non-interacting limit.
  2. The reported deviation in the scaling of the localization length lacks details on data exclusion rules, fitting ranges, and error bars. This makes it challenging to verify if the numerical results robustly support the analytical prediction of the shifted transition.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract mentions 'two renormalization group procedures' without specifying their names or key differences; a brief clarification would improve readability.
  2. Consider adding references to related works on 1D localization with correlated disorder to better contextualize the novelty.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We respond to each major comment below and indicate the changes planned for the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The justification for applying the two RG procedures rests on the vanishing of backward scattering processes due to the colored-noise disorder. However, the interacting case may generate finite backward scattering at higher orders. An explicit demonstration that the noise spectrum remains orthogonal to backward channels after including the interaction vertex is required as this underpins the shift of the transition point to the non-interacting limit.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification of orthogonality at higher orders is necessary to fully justify the RG procedures. The manuscript's RG analysis is based on the disorder spectrum being orthogonal to backward scattering at the relevant orders, but we did not include a detailed perturbative check for interaction-generated terms. In the revision we will add a supplementary calculation (as an appendix) that explicitly computes the matrix elements between the interaction vertex and the noise spectrum, demonstrating that backward-scattering channels remain orthogonal to leading orders in the disorder strength. This will strengthen the justification for shifting the transition to the non-interacting point. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The reported deviation in the scaling of the localization length lacks details on data exclusion rules, fitting ranges, and error bars. This makes it challenging to verify if the numerical results robustly support the analytical prediction of the shifted transition.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the numerical section would benefit from greater transparency. The localization-length data were extracted via finite-size scaling on systems up to L=512 with ensemble averaging, but the manuscript omitted explicit fitting protocols. In the revised version we will expand the methods and results sections to specify: (i) the precise fitting ranges used for the exponential decay (e.g., discarding the first 10% and last 5% of the chain to avoid boundary effects), (ii) the data-exclusion criteria (e.g., discarding realizations with localization length exceeding system size or with insufficient disorder averaging), and (iii) the procedure for error bars (standard deviation over 200–500 independent disorder realizations). These additions will allow direct assessment of the reported scaling deviation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; RG flows and numerical scaling are independent of fitted inputs

full rationale

The derivation begins from an explicit model choice: a colored-noise disorder correlator engineered to make backward scattering amplitudes identically zero. Two RG procedures are then applied to this fixed model to obtain the phase diagram, yielding the shift of the localization transition to the non-interacting point as a calculational outcome rather than a tautology. No parameter is fitted to a subset of data and then relabeled as a prediction. No load-bearing self-citation chain is invoked to justify the central claim; the vanishing-backward-scattering property is stated as a property of the chosen disorder spectrum. The final numerical demonstration that localization-length scaling deviates from the usual localized-phase form supplies an independent check outside the RG equations. The chain therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks and does not reduce to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only abstract available; the central assumption is the vanishing backward scattering property of the disorder. No free parameters or invented entities are identifiable from the given text.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The investigated disorder allows vanishing backward scattering processes
    Explicitly stated as the key property of the colored-noise disorder under study.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5593 in / 1025 out tokens · 53242 ms · 2026-05-19T04:37:21.093252+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Effective delocalization in the one-dimensional Anderson model with stealthy disorder

    cond-mat.dis-nn 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Stealthy disorder in the 1D Anderson model makes the localization length scale as a higher inverse power of disorder strength W, allowing it to exceed system size for sufficient stealthiness parameter χ.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    (which could implement both GCD or SD) should allow to probe the effects studied in this paper. The need to match the cut-off of the disorder spectrum /u1D458ę to 2/u1D458F (or 2/u1D70B/u1D70C0 for bosons) would require to perform such experiments in a box potential 5 rather than in the presence of a parabolic trap. This work was supported by the Swiss Nati...

    work page 2030

  2. [2]

    P . W . Anderson, Absence of diffusion in certain random lattices, Phys. Rev. 109, 1492 (1958)

    work page 1958

  3. [3]

    B. L. Altshuler, A. G. Aronov, and P . A. Lee, Interaction effects in disordered Fermi systems in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 1288 (1980)

    work page 1980

  4. [4]

    A. M. Finkel’stein, Weak localization and Coulomb interaction in disordered systems, Z. Phys. B Con. Mat. 56, 189 (1984)

    work page 1984

  5. [5]

    P . A. Lee and T. V . Ramakrishnan, Disordered electronic systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 57, 287 (1985)

    work page 1985

  6. [6]

    Giamarchi, Quantum Physics in One Dimension, International series of monographs on physics, Vol

    T. Giamarchi, Quantum Physics in One Dimension, International series of monographs on physics, Vol. 121 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004)

    work page 2004

  7. [7]

    Giamarchi and H

    T. Giamarchi and H. J. Schulz, Anderson localization and in- teractions in one-dimensional metals, Phys. Rev. B 37, 325 (1988)

    work page 1988

  8. [8]

    M. P . A. Fisher, P . B. Weichman, G. Grinstein, and D. S. Fisher, Boson localization and the superfluid-insulator transition, Phys. Rev. B 40, 546 (1989)

    work page 1989

  9. [9]

    D. A. Abanin, E. Altman, I. Bloch, and M. Serbyn, Colloquium: Many-body localization, thermalization, and entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 021001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  10. [10]

    D. J. Luitz, N. Laflorencie, and F. Alet, Many-body localization edge in the random-field Heisenberg chain, Phys. Rev. B 91, 081103 (2015)

    work page 2015

  11. [11]

    J. Z. Imbrie, On many-body localization for quantum spin chains, J. Stat. Phys. 163, 998 (2016)

    work page 2016

  12. [12]

    D. A. Keen and A. L. Goodwin, The crystallography of correlated disorder, Nature 521, 303 (2015)

    work page 2015

  13. [13]

    V . D. Neverov, A. E. Lukyanov, A. V . Krasavin, A. Vagov, and M. D. Croitoru, Correlated disorder as a way towards robust superconductivity, Commun. Phys. 5, 177 (2022)

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    Sanchez-Palencia and M

    L. Sanchez-Palencia and M. Lewenstein, Disordered quantum gases under control, Nat. Phys. 6, 87 (2010)

    work page 2010

  15. [15]

    Roati, C

    G. Roati, C. D’Errico, L. Fallani, M. Fattori, C. Fort, M. Zaccanti, G. Modugno, M. Modugno, and M. Inguscio, Anderson localiza- tion of a non-interacting Bose-Einstein condensate, Nature 453, 895 (2008)

    work page 2008

  16. [16]

    Tanese, E

    D. Tanese, E. Gurevich, F. Baboux, T. Jacqmin, A. Lema ˆıtre, E. Galopin, I. Sagnes, A. Amo, J. Bloch, and E. Akkermans, Frac- tal energy spectrum of a polariton gas in a Fibonacci quasiperiodic potential, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 146404 (2014)

    work page 2014

  17. [17]

    Aubry and G

    S. Aubry and G. Andr´ ´e, Analyticity breaking and Anderson localization in incommensurate lattices, Ann. Isr. Phy. 3, 133 (1980)

    work page 1980

  18. [18]

    Vidal, D

    J. Vidal, D. Mouhanna, and T. Giamarchi, Correlated fermions in a one-dimensional quasiperiodic potential, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3908 (1999)

    work page 1999

  19. [20]

    G. Roux, T. Barthel, I. P . McCulloch, C. Kollath, U. Schollw¨ock, and T. Giamarchi, Quasiperiodic Bose-Hubbard model and localization in one-dimensional cold atomic gases, Phys. Rev. A 78, 023628 (2008)

    work page 2008

  20. [21]

    D’Errico, E

    C. D’Errico, E. Lucioni, L. Tanzi, L. Gori, G. Roux, I. P . McCul- loch, T. Giamarchi, M. Inguscio, and G. Modugno, Observation of a disordered bosonic insulator from weak to strong interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 095301 (2014)

    work page 2014

  21. [22]

    L. Gori, T. Barthel, A. Kumar, E. Lucioni, L. Tanzi, M. Inguscio, G. Modugno, T. Giamarchi, C. D’Errico, and G. Roux, Finite- temperature effects on interacting bosonic one-dimensional sys- tems in disordered lattices, Phys. Rev. A 93, 033650 (2016)

    work page 2016

  22. [23]

    H. Y ao, A. Khoudli, L. Bresque, and L. Sanchez-Palencia, Critical behavior and fractality in shallow one-dimensional quasiperiodic potentials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 070405 (2019)

    work page 2019

  23. [24]

    H. Y ao, T. Giamarchi, and L. Sanchez-Palencia, Lieb-Liniger bosons in a shallow quasiperiodic potential: Bose glass phase and fractal Mott lobes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 060401 (2020)

    work page 2020

  24. [25]

    Schreiber, S

    M. Schreiber, S. S. Hodgman, P . Bordia, H. P . L¨ uschen, M. H. Fischer, R. Vosk, E. Altman, U. Schneider, and I. Bloch, Obser- vation of many-body localization of interacting fermions in a quasirandom optical lattice, Science 349, 842 (2015)

    work page 2015

  25. [26]

    Sanchez-Palencia, D

    L. Sanchez-Palencia, D. Cl ´ement, P . Lugan, P . Bouyer, G. V . Shlyapnikov, and A. Aspect, Anderson localization of expanding Bose-Einstein condensates in random potentials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 210401 (2007)

    work page 2007

  26. [27]

    Billy, V

    J. Billy, V . Josse, Z. Zuo, A. Bernard, B. Hambrecht, P . Lugan, D. Clement, L. Sanchez-Palencia, P . Bouyer, and A. Aspect, Direct observation of Anderson localization of matter waves in a controlled disorder, Nature 453, 891 (2008)

    work page 2008

  27. [28]

    R. C. Kuhn, C. Miniatura, D. Delande, O. Sigwarth, and C. A. M¨ uller, Localization of matter waves in two-dimensional disor- dered optical potentials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 250403 (2005)

    work page 2005

  28. [29]

    R. C. Kuhn, O. Sigwarth, C. Miniatura, D. Delande, and C. A. M¨ uller, Coherent matter wave transport in speckle potentials, New J. Phys. 9, 161 (2007)

    work page 2007

  29. [30]

    Piraud, L

    M. Piraud, L. Pezz´e, and L. Sanchez-Palencia, Matter wave trans- port and Anderson localization in anisotropic three-dimensional disorder, Europhys. Lett. 99, 50003 (2012)

    work page 2012

  30. [32]

    Piraud, A

    M. Piraud, A. Aspect, and L. Sanchez-Palencia, Anderson local- ization of matter waves in tailored disordered potentials, Phys. Rev. A 85, 063611 (2012)

    work page 2012

  31. [33]

    Piraud and L

    M. Piraud and L. Sanchez-Palencia, Tailoring Anderson localiza- tion by disorder correlations in 1D speckle potentials, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 217, 91 (2013)

    work page 2013

  32. [34]

    Gurarie and J

    V . Gurarie and J. T. Chalker, Some generic aspects of bosonic excitations in disordered systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 136801 (2002)

    work page 2002

  33. [35]

    Gurarie and J

    V . Gurarie and J. T. Chalker, Bosonic excitations in random media, Phys. Rev. B 68, 134207 (2003)

    work page 2003

  34. [36]

    Lugan, D

    P . Lugan, D. Cl´ement, P . Bouyer, A. Aspect, and L. Sanchez- Palencia, Anderson localization of Bogolyubov quasiparticles in interacting Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 180402 (2007)

    work page 2007

  35. [37]

    Lugan and L

    P . Lugan and L. Sanchez-Palencia, Localization of Bogoliubov quasiparticles in interacting Bose gases with correlated disorder, Phys. Rev. A 84, 013612 (2011)

    work page 2011

  36. [38]

    F. D. M. Haldane, ’Luttinger liquid theory’ of one-dimensional quantum fluids. I. properties of the Luttinger model and their extension to the general 1D interacting spinless Fermi gas, J. Phys. C Solid State 14, 2585 (1981)

    work page 1981

  37. [39]

    M. A. Cazalilla, R. Citro, T. Giamarchi, E. Orignac, and M. Rigol, One dimensional bosons: From condensed matter systems to ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1405 (2011) . 6

    work page 2011

  38. [40]

    See Supplemental Material for further details about the speckle and Gaussian disorder, the effect of forward scattering, details on the derivations of the RG equations, details on the numerical realization of a speckle disorder and numerical results

    work page

  39. [41]

    J. C. Dainty, Laser speckle and related phenomena , Vol. 9 (Springer science & business Media, 2013)

    work page 2013

  40. [42]

    J. W. Goodman, Statistical optics (John Wiley & Sons, 2015)

    work page 2015

  41. [43]

    S. S. Kondov, W. R. McGehee, J. J. Zirbel, and B. DeMarco, Three-dimensional Anderson localization of ultracold matter, Science 334, 66 (2011)

    work page 2011

  42. [44]

    Jendrzejeweski, A

    F. Jendrzejeweski, A. Bernard, K. M¨ uller, P . Cheinet, V . Josse, M. Piraud, L. Pezz ´e, L. Sanchez-Palencia, A. Aspect, and P . Bouyer, Three-dimensional localization of ultracold atoms in an optical disordered potential, Nat. Phys. 8, 398 (2012)

    work page 2012

  43. [46]

    Piraud, P

    M. Piraud, P . Lugan, P . Bouyer, A. Aspect, and L. Sanchez- Palencia, Localization of a matter wave packet in a disordered potential, Phys. Rev. A 83, 031603 (2011)

    work page 2011

  44. [47]

    Localization Transition for Interacting Quantum Particles in Colored-Noise Disorder

    A. Rubio-Abadal, J.-y. Choi, J. Zeiher, S. Hollerith, J. Rui, I. Bloch, and C. Gross, Many-body delocalization in the presence of a quantum bath, Phys. Rev. X 9, 041014 (2019). Supplementary material for “Localization Transition for Interacting Quantum Particles in Colored-Noise Disorder” Giacomo Morpurgo, 1 Laurent Sanchez-Palencia, 2 and Thierry Giamarc...

    work page 2019

  45. [48]

    : ï/u1D447ă /u1D452ğę1č ( Į1,ă1 ) . . . /u1D452ğęĤč ( ĮĤ,ăĤ ) ð0 ≈ { /u1D452− ć 2 /summationtext.1 ğ>Ġ ęğęĠ ln ( |Ĩğ−ĨĠ| Ă ) /summationtext.1 ğ /u1D450ğ = 0 0 /summationtext.1 ğ /u1D450ğ ≠ 0 (C5) where = ( /u1D465, /u1D462/u1D70F) and /u1D45F2 = /u1D4652 + /u1D4622/u1D70F2 and in the limit where | /u1D45Fğ − /u1D45FĠ| k /u1D6FC. We will also use the follo...

    work page

  46. [49]

    Giamarchi, Quantum Physics in One Dimension , International series of monographs on physics, Vol

    T. Giamarchi, Quantum Physics in One Dimension , International series of monographs on physics, Vol. 121 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004)

    work page 2004

  47. [50]

    Vidal, D

    J. Vidal, D. Mouhanna, and T. Giamarchi, Interacting fermions in self-similar potentials, Phys. Rev. B 65, 014201 (2001)

    work page 2001

  48. [51]

    Mahan, Many-Particle Physics (Springer New Y ork, 2000)

    G. Mahan, Many-Particle Physics (Springer New Y ork, 2000). 6

    work page 2000

  49. [52]

    S ´olyom, The Fermi gas model of one-dimensional conductors, Adv

    J. S ´olyom, The Fermi gas model of one-dimensional conductors, Adv. Phys. 28, 201 (1979)

    work page 1979

  50. [53]

    Lugan, A

    P . Lugan, A. Aspect, L. Sanchez-Palencia, D. Delande, B. Gr ´emaud, C. A. M¨ uller, and C. Miniatura, One-dimensional Anderson localization in certain correlated random potentials, Phys. Rev. A 80, 023605 (2009)

    work page 2009