Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

A Stochastic RAGE Theorem and Enhanced Dissipation for Transport Noise

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read A stochastic RAGE theorem gives a necessary and sufficient condition for transport noise to be dissipation enhancing: it fails exactly when the drift has a non-trivial finite-dimensional $H^1$-invariant subspace.

desk verdict Strong paper worth refereeing: stochastic RAGE, an iff criterion for enhanced dissipation, and sharp shear-flow rates are real advances, but Theorem 4's iteration step needs a patch. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.11422 v1 pith:M47FJYY3 submitted 2025-07-15 math.AP math.PR

classification math.APmath.PR MSC 60H1535Q3535R60
keywords transportnoiseenhanceddissipationRAGEtheoremtwo-pointmotionstochasticshearflowsinvariantsubspacesadvection-diffusionpassivescalar
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves a stochastic analogue of the RAGE theorem for the two-point motion generated by a linear transport SPDE, and uses it to characterise enhanced dissipation. The main claim is that transport noise is dissipation enhancing precisely when the family of operators $\sigma_k\cdot\nabla$ has no non-trivial finite-dimensional invariant subspace inside $H^1(\mathbb T^d)$. In the abstract setting, the same dichotomy holds for any collection of anti-self-adjoint (skew) operators $iL_k$ and any positive dissipative operator $A$ with compact resolvent. This turns a question about mixing into a spectral computation: either every mode decays at the enhanced time scale, or a finite-dimensional obstruction survives. For stochastic shear flows, the paper also obtains sharp exponential decay rates, determined by the maximal order of overlapping critical points of the shear profiles.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the generator of the two-point motion, $L=\frac12\sum_k(iL_k\otimes I-I\otimes iL_k)^2$, studied on the space $H_{\rm sym}$ of symmetric Hilbert–Schmidt operators. The stochastic RAGE theorem (Theorem 2) asserts that for any compact operator $K$, $E\|KP_c\Phi_{s,t}f_0\|^2\to 0$ as $t\to\infty$, where $P_c$ projects onto the complement of the smallest closed subspace $H_{\rm inv}$ generated by finite-dimensional invariant subspaces of the $iL_k$. The proof classifies $\ker L$: its elements are exactly sums $\sum_j\gamma_j P_j$ over mutually orthogonal finite-dimensional subspaces $V_j$ invariant under all $iL_k$. For stochastic shear flows, the same two-point idea reduces the problem to a Schrödinger operator $L_\lambda=-\Delta+\lambda^2\sum_j(u_j(y)-u_j(y'))^2$, and Theorem 5 bounds its smallest eigenvalue below by $c\lambda^{2/(n_0+2)}$ using IMS localization and local polynomial approximations of the potential near its zero set. This eigenvalue bound is what produces the sharp dissipation rate.

What would settle it

Compute $E\|f^\nu(\tau/\nu)\|_{L^2}^2$ for a concrete family $\{\sigma_k\}$ with no non-trivial finite-dimensional $H^1$-invariant subspace, letting $\nu\to 0$; Theorem 1 predicts this tends to zero for every fixed $\tau$, so any positive limit would refute the dichotomy. For stochastic shear flows, the corresponding check is whether the set $E$ contains an open interval: the paper predicts enhanced dissipation exactly when it does not.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the central claim is Theorem 1. For the transport-noise advection-diffusion equation (1.4) on $\mathbb T^d$, exactly one of the following holds: the drift $\Sigma=\{\sigma_k\}$ is dissipation enhancing, so that $E\|f^\nu(\tau/\nu)\|_{L^2}^2\le \delta\|f_0\|^2$ for every $\tau,\delta>0$ and all sufficiently small $\nu$; or there exists a non-trivial finite-dimensional subspace $V\subset H\cap H^1(\mathbb T^d)$ such that $(\sigma_k\cdot\nabla)V\subset V$ for every $k$. The abstract version (Theorem 4) states the same dichotomy for the SPDE (1.6): it is dissipation enhancing if and only if no non-trivial finite-dimensional subspace of the form domain of $A$ is invariant under all $iL_k$. The paper further proves that stochastic shear flows on $\mathbb T^2$ satisfy sharp bounds with exponential rate $\nu^{(n_0+1)/(n_0+2)}\kappa^{1/(n_0+2)}|\ell|^{2/(n_0+2)}$, where $n_0$ is the maximal order of spatially overlapping critical points of the shear profiles.

Load-bearing premise

The dichotomy rests on the assumption that the inviscid SPDE has unique strong solutions from a dense set of initial data, with a solution operator that is a random isometry; for the quantitative shear-flow rates, the additional fragile condition is the existence of a finite maximal order $n_0$ of overlapping critical points.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Checking enhanced dissipation for a given noise reduces to computing the common $H^1$ eigenfunctions of $\sigma_k\cdot\nabla$: if their finite spans contain no non-trivial invariant subspace, Theorem 1 guarantees decay at the $\tau/\nu$ time scale.
  • For stochastic shear flows on $\mathbb T^2$, enhanced dissipation holds exactly when the set $E=\bigcap_j\bigcup_{z:\mathrm{Leb}(u_j^{-1}\{z\})>0}u_j^{-1}\{z\}$ contains no open interval; the exponential rate $\nu^{(n_0+1)/(n_0+2)}\kappa^{1/(n_0+2)}|\ell|^{2/(n_0+2)}$ is sharp up to the prefactor.
  • The stochastic RAGE theorem yields Corollary 2.11: the inviscid transport SPDE has non-trivial invariant measures if and only if some finite-dimensional subspace is invariant under all $iL_k$.
  • When only one drift operator is active, the criterion recovers the deterministic characterization of enhanced dissipation from [CKRZ08].
  • In the generic shear case $n_0=0$, the dissipation rate is $\sqrt{\nu\kappa}|\ell|$, and the hypoelliptic regularization is quantified as Gevrey regularity of order $p>(n_0+2)/2$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural algorithmic extension, not pursued in the paper, is to decide dissipation enhancement for a finite set of vector fields by computing joint eigenspaces of the $\sigma_k\cdot\nabla$; the dichotomy turns the SPDE question into linear algebra plus an $H^1$-regularity check.
  • The comparison with deterministic shear flows suggests a general trade-off: randomising a shear may slow the strongest exponential mixing mechanism while strengthening hypoelliptic regularisation; testing whether the same trade-off appears for deterministic time-dependent shears would clarify whether the effect is specific to Brownian noise.
  • The spectral strategy used here should transfer to any noise geometry whose two-point potential has a tractable zero set; the dissipation exponent would then be read off from the vanishing order of the potential along its zero set, for example for random cellular flows.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper develops a stochastic analogue of the classical RAGE theorem for the two-point motion generated by a linear SPDE with anti-self-adjoint noise operators (Theorem 2), and uses it to characterize enhanced dissipation for abstract diffusive equations (Theorem 4): the equation (1.6) is dissipation enhancing if and only if there is no finite-dimensional H^1 subspace invariant under all iL_k. In the transport-noise setting this yields Theorem 1 for divergence-free vector fields sigma_k. For stochastic shear flows, the paper proves explicit and sharp enhanced dissipation rates (Theorem 3, Corollaries 4.1 and 4.3) via spectral analysis of a Schrodinger operator with potential sum_j (u_j(y)-u_j(y'))^2, plus lower bounds showing optimality. The paper also derives consequences for invariant measures and hypoelliptic examples.

Significance. The paper is significant: if correct, it gives the first necessary-and-sufficient criterion for enhanced dissipation under transport noise, recovering the deterministic CKRZ08 condition as a special case. The stochastic RAGE theorem is a new tool with independent interest, and the two-point-motion/essential-self-adjointness framework is elegant. The shear-flow analysis yields sharp rates with explicit dependence on n0, and the lower bounds confirm optimality. The paper also provides checkable examples and connects to Gevrey regularization. The proofs are detailed and the main abstract theorem is supported by a rigorous spectral classification. However, the forward implication of Theorem 4 contains a conditional-iteration gap that must be fixed, and the compact-operator case of Theorem 2 is explicitly omitted; these issues are local and appear fixable.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.2, proof of Theorem 4, Eq. (3.24)] The single-step decay estimate (3.24) is established only for a starting time tau0 at which E||f_nu(tau0)||^2_{H^1} < lambda_M E||f_nu(tau0)||^2. The proof then states 'thanks to the uniformity of tau1, we may iterate this bound' to obtain decay over [0, tau/nu]. This iteration is not justified: after one step, the ratio E||f_nu||^2_{H^1}/E||f_nu||^2 may again exceed lambda_M, and the estimate cannot be reapplied. Since the forward implication of Theorem 4 depends on obtaining a fixed multiplicative decay over the whole interval, this gap is load-bearing. A fix is to partition [0, tau/nu] into low- and high-ratio intervals, using the energy equation (3.18) on high-ratio intervals and (3.24) on low-ratio intervals, but the written proof does not contain this argument.
  2. [Section 2, proof of Theorem 2 and Proposition 2.8] Theorem 2 is stated for any compact operator K, and its proof is contained in the 'Proof of Theorem 2 and Proposition 2.8.' That proof handles only finite-rank K and explicitly says 'The compact case is the same as for the deterministic RAGE theorem, so we omit it.' This leaves a gap in a stated main theorem. The finite-rank case suffices for Lemma 3.2 and the proof of Theorem 4, but the advertised stochastic RAGE theorem is not fully proved. Please either provide the density/approximation argument or re-state Theorem 2 for finite-rank operators and adjust subsequent references.
  3. [Section 4, proof of Corollary 4.1] The almost-sure time-extension step, which is essential for the random constant C_{ell,nu,kappa,epsilon} and its moment bounds, is delegated to [GY21, Section 3.3] with the phrase 'we may replicate the arguments.' This is a substantial part of the proof, and the paper should either include the details or explicitly identify the precise statements from [GY21] being used and verify their hypotheses in the present setting. As written, the derivation of (4.27) and the subsequent moment estimate are not fully self-contained.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3.2, Eq. (3.50)] In (3.50), the integrand is written as ||f_nu(s)||_{H^1} but the subsequent use of the energy equation (3.51) requires ||f_nu(s)||^2_{H^1}; this appears to be a typographical omission of the square.
  2. [Abstract] The phrase 'family of self-adjoint operator' should be 'family of self-adjoint operators'.
  3. [Section 4 and Theorem 3] The random constant in Corollary 4.1 is denoted C_{ell,nu,kappa,epsilon} in (4.3) but C_{epsilon,ell,nu,kappa} in Theorem 3; please use a consistent notation.
  4. [Section 3.2, proof of Theorem 4] The symbol nu_0 is used both for the small-parameter cutoff and in (3.27) where the current viscosity nu appears; the inequality is correct since nu < nu_0, but the notation could be clarified.
  5. [Section 3.3.1] In the characterization of the set E, the union over z in R of u_j^{-1}{z} should be stated more precisely, since u_j^{-1}{z} is nonempty only for countably many z when the level set has positive measure.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the enhanced-dissipation dichotomy is derived from the two-point generator, the stochastic RAGE theorem, and independent spectral estimates.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are not equivalent to their inputs by construction. Theorem 1/4 characterizes dissipation enhancement via the absence of finite-dimensional H^1 invariant subspaces for the iL_k; the forward direction is proved from the two-point generator kernel classification (Lemma 2.2), the stochastic RAGE theorem (Theorem 2/Proposition 2.8), and the uniform growth Lemma 3.2, while the reverse direction exhibits explicit non-decay along an invariant subspace via the energy balance (3.46)-(3.52). The key dichotomy condition is derived, not assumed: the kernel of the two-point generator is computed from the spectral theorem (Lemma 2.5), and the contradiction in Lemma 3.2 uses the nonexistence of invariant subspaces to force uniform H^1 growth. The shear-flow rates are obtained from semiclassical eigenvalue lower bounds for L_lambda (Theorems 5-6, Lemma 4.7) and complementary trial states (Lemma 4.10), with n0 entering as a quantitative hypothesis rather than as a fitted parameter. Self-citations such as [BCZ17], [BCZG23], and [Vil24] are contextual or used only for comparison; load-bearing technical inputs ([Kun97], [Sim84], [GY21], [RS79]) are external. The iteration gap identified by the skeptic in Section 3.2 is a proof-completeness concern about handling above-threshold intervals, not a circular reduction of the conclusion to its premise, so it does not affect the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No parameters are fitted to data; the paper is analytic. The central claim rests on the abstract well-posedness assumptions (A1)-(A3), on stochastic flow estimates imported from Kun97 and GY21, and on standard spectral tools. No new entities are postulated.

assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Assumption (A1): existence of a norm-dense subspace C of strong solutions to the inviscid SPDE (1.7), with a random isometric solution operator Phi_{s,t}.
    Introduced in Section 2, Assumption (A1). Used to prove Lemma 2.2, the essential self-adjointness of the two-point generator L and the representation E(Phi f0 tensor Phi f0) = e^{Lt} E(f0 tensor f0).
  • domain assumption Assumption (A2): an H^1 growth bound E||f(t)||_{H^1}^2 <= B(t) E||f0||_{H^1}^2 with B in L1_loc(0, infinity).
    Used in Lemma 3.2 and in Theorem 4 to control the difference between viscous and inviscid orbits, see equation (3.27). Verified for transport noise via stochastic flow derivative estimates.
  • domain assumption Assumption (A3): viscous solutions enter the dense subspace C for every t > 0.
    Stated before Theorem 4; couples the viscous problem to the inviscid RAGE machinery.
  • domain assumption Kunita stochastic flow of diffeomorphisms for (1.8) with C^2 divergence-free vector fields, and finite second moment of D phi^{-1} in L infinity from GY21, Lemma 3.9.
    Used in Section 3.3 to verify (A1)-(A2) for transport noise; if the flow lacks these moment bounds the abstract criterion may not apply.
  • domain assumption Structural hypothesis on shear profiles: every x in T has some j and n <= n0 with u_j^{(n+1)}(x) not equal to 0, and each u_j has finitely many isolated critical points.
    Assumption of Theorem 5 and Corollary 4.1; n0 enters the sharp rate exponent (n0+1)/(n0+2) and 2/(n0+2).
  • standard math Standard spectral tools: spectral theorem, IMS localization formula, and Sim84 semiclassical eigenvalue scaling for non-degenerate minima.
    Used through Sections 2 and 4 to classify kernels and prove Theorem 5; accepted external results.
  • standard math Zorn's lemma, Birkhoff ergodic theorem, Krylov-Bogolyubov theorem, and the BBB16 strong maximum principle for hypoelliptic operators.
    Used in Lemma 2.9, Corollary 2.11, and Lemma 3.3.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Stochastic RAGE Theorem and Enhanced Dissipation for Transport Noise." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/M47FJYY3

@misc{pith2026250711422,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Stochastic RAGE Theorem and Enhanced Dissipation for Transport Noise},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/M47FJYY3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.11422}
}
read the original abstract

We prove a stochastic version of the classical RAGE theorem that applies to the two-point motion generated by noisy transport equations. As a consequence, we identify a necessary and sufficient condition for the corresponding diffusive equation to be dissipation enhancing. This involves the identification of a non-trivial, finite dimensional subspace that is invariant for the family of self-adjoint operator characterizing the structure of the transport noise. We discuss several examples and prove a sharp enhanced dissipation rate for stochastic shear flows.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Superexponential dissipation enhancement on $\mathbb{T}^d$

    math.AP 2025-09 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    For advection-diffusion on T^d there exist incompressible velocity fields and initial data whose L2 mass decays double exponentially in 2D, like e^{-Ct^2} in 3D, and superexponentially in 4D.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type url doi eprint volume year label extra.label sort.label INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION not #0 #2 if INTEGERS l FUNCTION string.length #1 'l := ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in capitalize " " * FUNCT...

  3. [3]

    Albritton , R

    D. Albritton , R. Beekie , and M. Novack . Enhanced dissipation and H \" o rmander's hypoellipticity. J. Funct. Anal. 283, no. 3, (2022), Paper No. 109522, 38. doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2022.109522 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfa.2022.109522

  4. [4]

    Ayyer , C

    A. Ayyer , C. Liverani , and M. Stenlund . Quenched CLT for random toral automorphism. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 24, no. 2, (2009), 331--348. doi:10.3934/dcds.2009.24.331 https://doi.org/10.3934/dcds.2009.24.331

  5. [5]

    Battaglia , S

    E. Battaglia , S. Biagi , and A. Bonfiglioli . The strong maximum principle and the harnack inequality for a class of hypoelliptic non-hörmander operators. Annales de l’institut Fourier 66, no. 2, (2016), 589–631. doi:10.5802/aif.3020 https://doi.org/10.5802/aif.3020

  6. [6]

    Bedrossian , A

    J. Bedrossian , A. Blumenthal , and S. Punshon-Smith . Almost-sure enhanced dissipation and uniform-in-diffusivity exponential mixing for advection-diffusion by stochastic N avier- S tokes. Probab. Theory Related Fields 179, no. 3-4, (2021), 777--834. doi:10.1007/s00440-020-01010-8 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00440-020-01010-8

  7. [7]

    Bedrossian , A

    J. Bedrossian , A. Blumenthal , and S. Punshon-Smith . Almost-sure exponential mixing of passive scalars by the stochastic Navier - Stokes equations. Ann. Probab. 50, no. 1, (2022), 241--303. doi:10.1214/21-AOP1533 https://doi.org/10.1214/21-AOP1533

  8. [8]

    Bedrossian and M

    J. Bedrossian and M. Coti Zelati . Enhanced dissipation, hypoellipticity, and anomalous small noise inviscid limits in shear flows. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 224, no. 3, (2017), 1161--1204. doi:10.1007/s00205-017-1099-y https://doi.org/10.1007/s00205-017-1099-y

Show all 32 references
  1. [9]

    Blumenthal , M

    A. Blumenthal , M. Coti Zelati , and R. S. Gvalani . Exponential mixing for random dynamical systems and an example of Pierrehumbert . Ann. Probab. 51, no. 4, (2023), 1559--1601. doi:10.1214/23-AOP1627 https://doi.org/10.1214/23-AOP1627

  2. [10]

    Beck and C

    M. Beck and C. E. Wayne . Metastability and rapid convergence to quasi-stationary bar states for the two-dimensional N avier- S tokes equations. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 143, no. 5, (2013), 905--927. doi:10.1017/S0308210511001478 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0308210511001478

  3. [11]

    Cooperman , G

    W. Cooperman , G. Iyer , and S. Son . A Harris theorem for enhanced dissipation, and an example of Pierrehumbert . arXiv e-prints (2024). arXiv:2403.19858 https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.19858

  4. [12]

    Constantin , A

    P. Constantin , A. Kiselev , L. Ryzhik , and A. Zlato s . Diffusion and mixing in fluid flow. Ann. of Math. (2) 168, no. 2, (2008), 643--674. doi:10.4007/annals.2008.168.643 https://doi.org/10.4007/annals.2008.168.643

  5. [13]

    Coti Zelati , M

    M. Coti Zelati , M. G. Delgadino , and T. M. Elgindi . On the relation between enhanced dissipation timescales and mixing rates. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 73, no. 6, (2020), 1205--1244. doi:10.1002/cpa.21831 https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.21831

  6. [14]

    Coti Zelati and T

    M. Coti Zelati and T. Gallay . Enhanced dissipation and T aylor dispersion in higher-dimensional parallel shear flows. J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 108, no. 4, (2023), 1358--1392

  7. [15]

    Dolgopyat , V

    D. Dolgopyat , V. Kaloshin , and L. Koralov . Sample path properties of the stochastic flows. Ann. Probab. 32, no. 1A, (2004), 1--27. doi:10.1214/aop/1078415827 https://doi.org/10.1214/aop/1078415827

  8. [16]

    Da Prato and J

    G. Da Prato and J. Zabczyk . Stochastic equations in infinite dimensions, vol. 152 of Encycl. Math. Appl. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2nd ed. ed., 2014. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107295513 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107295513

  9. [17]

    Fucci , F

    G. Fucci , F. Gesztesy , K. Kirsten , L. L. Littlejohn , R. Nichols , and J. Stanfill . The K rein--von N eumann extension revisited. Appl. Anal. 101, no. 5, (2022), 1593--1616. doi:10.1080/00036811.2021.1938005 https://doi.org/10.1080/00036811.2021.1938005

  10. [18]

    Gardner , K

    V. Gardner , K. L. Liss , and J. C. Mattingly . A pathwise approach to the enhanced dissipation of passive scalars advected by shear flows . arXiv e-prints (2024). arXiv:2410.05657 https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.05657

  11. [19]

    Gess and I

    B. Gess and I. Yaroslavtsev . Stabilization by transport noise and enhanced dissipation in the Kraichnan model . arXiv e-prints (2021). arXiv:2104.03949 https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.03949 . doi:10.48550/arXiv.2104.03949 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2104.03949

  12. [20]

    H \"o rmander

    L. H \"o rmander . The analysis of linear partial differential operators. IV : Fourier integral operators . Class. Math. Berlin: Springer, reprint of the 1985 original, corr. 2nd printing ed., 2009. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-00136-9 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00136-9

  13. [21]

    T. Kato . Perturbation theory for linear operators, vol. Band 132 of Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, second ed., 1976, xxi+619

  14. [22]

    H. Kunita . Generalized solutions of a stochastic partial differential equation. J. Theoret. Probab. 7, no. 2, (1994), 279--308. doi:10.1007/BF02214271 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02214271

  15. [23]

    H. Kunita . Stochastic flows and stochastic differential equations, vol. 24 of Camb. Stud. Adv. Math. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997

  16. [24]

    Navarro-Fernández and C

    V. Navarro-Fernández and C. Seis . Exponential mixing by random cellular flows, 2025. ://arxiv.org/abs/2502.17273

  17. [25]

    K. Rowan . On anomalous diffusion in the kraichnan model and correlated-in-time variants. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 248, no. 5(2024). doi:10.1007/s00205-024-02045-0 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00205-024-02045-0

  18. [26]

    Reed and B

    M. Reed and B. Simon . Tensor products of closed operators on Banach spaces. J. Funct. Anal. 13, (1973), 107--124. doi:10.1016/0022-1236(73)90038-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1236(73)90038-4

  19. [27]

    Reed and B

    M. Reed and B. Simon . Methods of modern mathematical physics. III : Scattering theory. New York , San Francisco , London : Academic Press . XV , 463 p. \ 42.00 (1979)., 1979

  20. [28]

    C. Seis . Bounds on the rate of enhanced dissipation. Comm. Math. Phys. 399, no. 3, (2023), 2071--2081. doi:10.1007/s00220-022-04588-3 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-022-04588-3

  21. [29]

    B. Simon . Errata: `` S emiclassical analysis of low lying eigenvalues. I . N ondegenerate minima: asymptotic expansions''. Ann. Inst. H. Poincar\' e Phys. Th\' e or. 40, no. 2, (1984), 224. ://www.numdam.org/item?id=AIHPB_1984__40_2_224_0

  22. [30]

    H. Takagi . Compact weighted composition operators on \(L^ p\) . Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 116, no. 2, (1992), 505--511. doi:10.2307/2159759 https://doi.org/10.2307/2159759

  23. [31]

    Villringer

    D. Villringer . Enhanced Dissipation via the Malliavin Calculus . arXiv e-prints (2024). arXiv:2405.12787 https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.12787

  24. [32]

    D. Wei . Diffusion and mixing in fluid flow via the resolvent estimate. Sci. China Math. 64, no. 3, (2021), 507--518. doi:10.1007/s11425-018-9461-8 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11425-018-9461-8

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.