Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

COS-EDGES: Co-rotation and Kinematic Stratification of the Multi-Phase CGM Around Edge-On Galaxies

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The circumgalactic gas around edge-on galaxies co-rotates with the disk inside 0.2 Rvir, then decouples by ionization state.

desk verdict A solid observational survey with a clean major-axis sample and a credible radial stratification trend, but the sign-based co-rotation metric makes the headline percentages looser than they look. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.11613 v2 pith:3HE62XDS submitted 2025-07-15 astro-ph.GA

Glenn G. Kacprzak , Benjamin D. Oppenheimer , Nikole M. Nielsen , Antonia Fernandez-Figueroa , Michael T. Murphy , Rebecca J. Allen , Tania M. Barone , Sameer
show 5 more authors
Christopher W. Churchill Joseph N. Burchett Kaustubh R. Gupta Jane C. Charlton Caleb B. Platukis
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords circumgalacticmediumquasar-galaxypairsemissionlinegalaxiesinterstellarco-rotationmulti-phasegasgalaxyrotationcurvesquasarabsorptionspectroscopy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces COS-EDGES, a survey of nine isolated, near-edge-on galaxies at $z\sim0.2$, each with a background quasar sightline along its major axis, and asks whether the circumgalactic medium (CGM) takes part in the galaxy's rotation. It claims the CGM is kinematically stratified: inside about $0.2\,R_{\rm vir}$, more than 80% of the absorption from every detected ion moves on the side of the galaxy's systemic velocity matching disk rotation, and the optical-depth-weighted velocity equals the disk's peak rotation speed. Beyond that boundary, cool low-ionisation gas still co-rotates in more than 80% of its absorption but lags to about 60% of the rotation speed, while hot OVI gas falls to a 60% co-rotation fraction and about 20% of the rotation speed. The paper interprets this as evidence that the inner halo is fed by extended co-rotating inflow or recycled accretion, whereas the outer warm halo is a separate, dynamically decoupled component. If correct, this gives an observational radius-dependent map of how galaxies acquire gas and angular momentum from their surroundings.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing setup is the restrictive absorber geometry: nine near-edge-on galaxies (inclination 60–85 degrees) with quasar sightlines within 38 kpc along the major axis (azimuthal angle within 35 degrees), so that absorption velocities can be compared directly with rotation-curve velocities along the same line of sight. The key statistic is the equivalent-width co-rotation fraction, $f_{\rm EW}^{\rm corot}$, the fraction of total absorption optical depth lying on the side of the galaxy systemic velocity that matches the disk rotation direction, with $v > v_{\rm sys}$ counted as co-rotating; it is supplemented by the optical-depth-weighted median velocity, $v_{\rm abs}$, and by the velocity widths $\Delta v_{50}$ and $\Delta v_{90}$ that enclose 50% and 90% of the total optical depth. These measures turn a single absorption profile per ion per sightline into quantities that can be stacked across galaxies and compared in two radial bins ($D/R_{\rm vir}=0.12$–$0.20$ and $0.21$–$0.31$). Bootstrap resampling over 1000 stacked spectra provides the uncertainties that let the two radial bins be distinguished.

What would settle it

A concrete falsifier is a stacking test that subtracts a simple infall model: if, after assigning a radially infalling component to each line profile and removing it, the remaining absorption does not retain more than 80% sign agreement with rotation at $D/R_{\rm vir}\le0.2$, the co-rotation claim fails. The same test could be run on a control sample of face-on or minor-axis systems, where co-rotation along the sightline should be absent; if the major-axis trend is reproduced there, the statistic is not measuring rotation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a radial kinematic stratification of the multi-phase CGM around disk galaxies. In stacked spectra split at $D/R_{\rm vir}=0.2$, the survey finds that at small radius every ion — Mg I, H I, Mg II, C II, C III, and O VI — has an equivalent-width co-rotation fraction above 0.80 and an optical-depth-weighted median velocity ($v_{\rm abs}$) of about 110 km/s, statistically consistent with the peak rotation speed. At larger radius, Mg I, Mg II, C II, and H I keep co-rotation fractions above 0.80 but their $v_{\rm abs}$ drops to roughly 60% of the rotation speed, whereas O VI drops to a co-rotation fraction of about 0.63 and $v_{\rm abs}$ of $0.20\pm0.15$ of the rotation speed. The velocity width containing half the optical depth ($\Delta v_{50}$) of low-ionisation gas is up to 1.8 times larger in the inner halo than at large radius, while $\Delta v_{50}$ (and $\Delta v_{90}$) for C III and O VI does not change with distance. The authors conclude that low-ionisation gas traces extended co-rotating inflow or recycled accretion, while O VI and H I beyond about $0.2\,R_{\rm vir}$ trace a mixture of co-rotating, lagging, and discrete collisionally ionised structures — the kinematic stratification the paper set out to establish.

Load-bearing premise

The result assumes that absorption on the same side of the galaxy's systemic velocity as the disk rotation is actually co-rotating gas; without modelling radial motion, a single sightline gives only one velocity component, so an infalling or foreground cloud with a small positive $v$ would be counted as co-rotating.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Within about $0.2\,R_{\rm vir}$, all probed gas phases share the disk's rotation speed, so the inner CGM is dynamically part of the galaxy's angular-momentum budget rather than a static or infalling envelope.
  • Beyond about $0.2\,R_{\rm vir}$, low-ionisation gas remains directionally co-rotating but slower (about 60% of peak speed), consistent with gas on its way into the disk, whether from cold inflow or recycled fountains.
  • OVI decouples most strongly at large radius (co-rotation fraction about 0.63, velocity about 20% of rotation speed), so warm/hot gas in the outer halo cannot be used as a tracer of disk rotation and may include material that is not gravitationally bound.
  • The larger inner-halo $\Delta v_{50}$ of low-ionisation gas, together with distance-invariant C III and O VI widths, implies that the cool phase becomes dynamically broad and multi-component near the galaxy while the warm-hot phase stays kinematically broad at every radius sampled.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the sign-based classification is accepted, the $0.2\,R_{\rm vir}$ transition is plausibly a universal scale in halos of roughly $10^{11.6}\,M_\odot$; an extension would be to measure where co-rotation drops in lower- and higher-mass galaxies and check whether that radius tracks the predicted cooling and virial-shock radius.
  • A natural extension the paper does not attempt is to fit each absorption profile with separate rotation, radial-inflow, and outflow components; without that decomposition, a foreground cloud moving slowly toward the observer is indistinguishable from a genuinely rotating one.
  • Measuring metallicities of the co-rotating low-ion absorption could separate pristine filamentary inflow from enriched recycled fountain gas, a distinction the paper explicitly leaves to future work.
  • If the stratification is real, spatially resolved CGM emission maps (for example in Ly-alpha or OVI) around edge-on galaxies should show an inner component rotating with the disk and an outer component lagging or scattering about systemic velocity, offering a test that does not rely on one quasar sightline per galaxy.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper introduces COS-EDGES, a survey of nine isolated, near-edge-on galaxies at z~0.2, each probed along its major axis by a background quasar at D/Rvir = 0.12-0.31. Using VLT/UVES and HST/COS spectra, the authors measure Mg I, H I, Mg II, C II, C III, and O VI absorption and compare its kinematics with galaxy rotation curves from Keck/LRIS and Magellan/MagE. The sample is split at D/Rvir = 0.2 into inner (4 galaxies) and outer (5 galaxies) bins. The central claims are that (i) at low D/Rvir, over 80% of absorption in all ions lies on the rotation side of systemic velocity and the optical-depth-weighted velocity v_abs matches the peak rotation speed; (ii) at high D/Rvir, low-ionisation gas retains >80% 'co-rotation' but v_abs drops to ~60% of v_rot, while O VI drops to ~60% co-rotation and ~20% v_rot; and (iii) the Δv50 widths of low ions are larger in the inner halo while C III and O VI widths do not change with radius. These results are interpreted as evidence for a kinematically stratified CGM: co-rotating, inflowing/recycled cool gas in the inner halo and a decoupled, collisionally ionised warm component at larger radii.

Significance. If the conclusions hold, the paper provides a valuable observational constraint on the angular momentum and radial structure of the multiphase CGM, using a carefully selected homogeneous sample of edge-on major-axis quasar-galaxy pairs at small impact parameters. The study is a natural extension of prior work by Nateghi et al. (2024a,b) and Ho et al. (2025), and it has the merit of directly measuring v_abs, velocity widths, and co-rotation fractions from stacked spectra with bootstrap uncertainties rather than relying on parametric fits. The comparison of low- and high-ionisation behaviour across a narrow radial range is a useful step toward connecting CGM kinematics to accretion and feedback physics. However, the physical interpretation is substantially dependent on a sign-based definition of co-rotation, which is a load-bearing weakness that needs to be addressed before the central claims can be accepted at face value.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.4.3, Eq. (1)] The equivalent-width co-rotation fraction is defined by integrating the numerator only over v > v_sys, so every absorption component on the positive-velocity side of systemic is counted as co-rotating regardless of whether its velocity matches the expected rotation velocity at the probed radius. Because each sightline yields only one line-of-sight velocity at one projected radius, a radially infalling or outflowing cloud with a small positive velocity is classified as co-rotating. The headline percentages (80%, 60%, 20%) are exactly these sign-based fractions. The definition is acknowledged as 'by construction' in the text, but the paper does not test whether a rotation-model-based metric would preserve the radial and ionisation trends. I recommend either renaming this quantity a 'same-side fraction' and tempering the physical interpretation accordingly, or adding an alternative metric that requires consistency with the rotation curve amplitude (e.g., the fraction of equivalent width within a tolerance of v_rot(D) at the sightline radius) and showing that the stratification remains.
  2. [Section 3.4.2, Figure 7] The key quantitative claim that O VI 'drops to 20% of the rotation speed' rests on v_abs/v_rot = 0.20 ± 0.15 in the high D/Rvir bin. With only five galaxies in that bin, this value is marginally consistent with a wide range, including values well above 0.3, and the difference between low and high bins is not quantified with a significance test. The text also reports the low-ionisation drop to ~0.6 without quoting uncertainties. Please report the full bootstrap distributions for each ion and bin, and give a significance level for the low-vs-high radial differences and for the O VI vs Mg II difference. This is necessary to support the abstract's precise-sounding percentages.
  3. [Section 3.4.1] The split at D/Rvir = 0.2 is a free choice that places four galaxies in the low bin and five in the high bin, with G1 and G4 sitting almost exactly on the boundary (D/Rvir = 0.20). The paper's central dichotomy ('within 0.2 Rvir' versus 'beyond 0.2 Rvir') depends on this binning, but no sensitivity test is presented. Please test whether the trends persist when the boundary is moved to, for example, 0.18 or 0.22, or when G1 and G4 are moved to the other bin. The discussion already motivates 0.2 Rvir from theory, but the observational claim should not be tied to an untested bin choice.
  4. [Section 2.3 and Appendix Figures 11, 14] The rotation curves for G2 and G5 are described as shallow and based on few spatial apertures because of faint emission lines. Since the paper normalises v_abs by the 'maximum rotation speed' of each galaxy, an uncertain maximum can directly bias the normalised velocities in the high D/Rvir bin, where G2 and G5 reside. Please quantify the uncertainty in the adopted peak rotation speeds (including how many apertures define the flat part) and consider cross-checks using alternative normalisations, such as the rotation velocity extrapolated to the impact parameter D or the circular velocity from the halo mass.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.4.2] The paragraph beginning 'hows the optical depth weighted velocity' appears truncated and then immediately repeated; the duplicated text should be removed and replaced with a clear description of Figure 7.
  2. [Section 3.4.2 and Figure 8 caption] There are several typographical errors, including 'the the optical depth weighted normalized velocity' and 'and and more steep' in the Figure 8 caption; these should be corrected.
  3. [Section 3.4.3, Figure 9] The text reports co-rotation fractions such as 0.84 and 0.63 without quoting uncertainties, even though the figure appears to show error bars. Please state the bootstrap 1σ values in the text or table.
  4. [Section 3.3 and Conclusions] The escape-velocity statement says low-ionisation gas in 8/9 galaxies is below the escape velocity at Rvir, but the text notes that G7 has a large fraction above it. Please clarify in the abstract and conclusions that the 8/9 refers to all of the low-ionisation absorption being bound, not simply the majority of galaxies having some bound absorption.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the kinematic stratification claims are direct measurements from stacked spectra, not predictions derived from fitted inputs or self-citations.

full rationale

The paper's central results—v_abs, Δv50, Δv90, and the equivalent-width co-rotation fraction—are measured directly from bootstrapped stacked absorption profiles after splitting the nine galaxies into low and high D/Rvir bins (Sections 3.4.1–3.4.3). No parameter is fitted to one subset of the data and then used to predict a closely related quantity; the co-rotation fraction (Section 3.4.3) is an explicitly defined, sign-based integral over the observed line profile. Its radial and ionization trends are therefore empirical outputs, not consequences of the definition: the fraction could have been ~0.5 or flat, but is observed to be >0.8 at low D/Rvir and to fall to ~0.63 for OVI at high D/Rvir. The only 'by construction' statement is the trivial bound 0 ≤ f_EW_corot ≤ 1. Self-citations (Nateghi et al. 2024a,b; Kacprzak et al. 2019) are used for method provenance and comparison, not as load-bearing evidence that forces the conclusions. The concern that sign agreement with vsys does not prove physical co-rotation is a limitation on the interpretation of the metric, not a circularity in its derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard observational associations: absorption gas belongs to the target galaxy at projected distance D, velocity sign maps to rotation direction, and halo masses come from an assumed stellar-to-halo relation. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • co-rotation integration limits (vmin, vmax) = per stacked spectrum; not tabulated
    The equivalent-width co-rotation fraction and v_abs depend on the velocity range over which absorption is 'significant' (Section 3.4.3). The boundary definition is not specified quantitatively, so it is a hand-chosen analysis choice.
  • D/Rvir bin boundary = 0.2
    The sample is divided at D/Rvir = 0.2 (Section 3.4.1). The boundary is motivated by theory but no robustness test to alternative splits is presented; it determines which galaxies fall in the low and high bins.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Gas detected in absorption is physically associated with the target galaxy and located at projected distance D from it.
    The analysis interprets all absorption within the selected velocity windows around the galaxy systemic redshift as CGM of that galaxy (Sections 2, 3.2). Intervening or unrelated absorbers would contaminate the stacked kinematics.
  • domain assumption The line-of-sight velocity sign relative to systemic is sufficient to identify co-rotation; any v > vsys counts as co-rotating.
    Equation in Section 3.4.3 defines f_EW_corot by sign only. Radial inflow, outflows or clouds with small positive velocity are counted as co-rotating without a rotation-curve model.
  • domain assumption Halo masses and virial radii from the stellar-to-halo mass relation (Girelli et al. 2020) and Bryan & Norman (1998) are accurate for these galaxies.
    D/Rvir is the organizing variable; uncertainties in Mh propagate directly into the bin classification (Table 1, Section 2).
  • domain assumption Rotation curves traced by H-alpha or [OII] emission represent the circular velocity of the disk at the quasar position.
    The normalized velocities compare v_abs to the maximum observed rotation speed (Section 3.4.2). For two low-SFR galaxies (G2, G5) the rotation curves are shallow with few reliable apertures (Appendix).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of COS-EDGES: Co-rotation and Kinematic Stratification of the Multi-Phase CGM Around Edge-On Galaxies." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3HE62XDS

@misc{pith2026250711613,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: COS-EDGES: Co-rotation and Kinematic Stratification of the Multi-Phase CGM Around Edge-On Galaxies},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3HE62XDS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.11613}
}
abstract

We present the first results from the COS-EDGES survey, targeting the kinematic connection between the ISM and multi-phase circumgalactic medium (CGM) in nine isolated, edge-on galaxies at z~0.2, each probed along its major axis by a background quasar at impact parameters of 13-38kpc. Using VLT/UVES and HST/COS quasar spectra, we analyse MgI, MgII, HI, CII, CIII, and OVI absorption relative to galaxy rotation curves from Keck/LRIS and Magellan/MagE spectra. We find that at lower $D/R_{vir}$ ($D/R_{vir}\leq 0.2$), over 80% of absorption in all ions lies on the side of systemic velocity matching disk rotation, and the optical-depth-weighted median velocity ($v_{abs}$) is consistent with the peak rotation speed. At higher $D/R_{vir}$ ($D/R_{vir} > 0.2$), the kinematics diverge by ionisation state: For low ionisation gas, the amount of co-rotating absorption remains >80%, yet $v_{abs}$ drops to 60% of the galaxy rotation speed. For high ionisation gas (OVI), only 60% of the absorption is consistent with co-rotation and $v_{abs}$ drops to 20% of the rotation speed. Furthermore, the velocity widths, corresponding to 50% of the total optical depth ($\Delta v_{50}$) for low ionisation gas is 1.8 times larger in the inner halo than at larger radii, while for CIII and OVI $\Delta v_{50}$ remains unchanged with distance. These results suggest a radially dependent CGM kinematic structure: the inner halo hosts cool, dynamically broad gas tightly coupled to disk rotation, whereas beyond 0.2$R_{vir}$, particularly traced by OVI and HI, the CGM shows weaker rotational alignment and lower velocity dispersion. Therefore, low-ionisation gas likely traces extended co-rotating gas, inflows and/or recycled accretion, while high-ionisation gas reflects a mixture of co-rotating, lagging, discrete collisionally ionised structures, indicating a kinematic stratification of the multi-phase CGM. [Abridged]

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.11613 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (Left) DECaLS grz composite images of each quasar field, in which the quasar appears as a bright blue point source and the largest galaxy in the frame is the targeted foreground galaxy. The galaxies are moderately inclined and have their major axes pointed towards the quasar sightline. These galaxies were previously identified as being isolated (Huang et al. 2021). (Right) Impact parameter, D, versus the MgII λ2796 … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Kinematic comparison between the galaxy ISM rotation curve for G7 and the multi-phase CGM absorption, with the quasar field image for reference. Blue circles represent the galaxy’s rotation curve, with rotation toward the quasar in the upper right quadrant. The y-axes show line of sight velocity relative to the galaxy systemic (right) and normalized by peak galaxy rotation velocity (left). The top and bottom axes in… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (13 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Kinematic comparison of the multi-phase CGM absorption relative to the escape velocity for galaxies G1 to G9. Galaxies are ordered in increasing D/Rvir from left to right, top to bottom. Absorption features for each galaxy are shown as histograms, with the line-of-sigh…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Stacked MgI, HI, MgII, CII, CIII and OVI absorption lines for the low D/Rvir bin (0.12 ≤D/Rvir≤ 0.20). The spectra are offset along the y-axis in order to compare their kinematic structure. The x-axis shows (left) line-of-sight velocity and (right) normalised velocitie…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (Left) Optical depth weighted median velocity, vabs, of the bootstrapped-stacked spectra for each ion relative to the galaxy systemic velocity (v = 0 km s–1), where the positive values indicate gas moving in the direction of the galaxy rotation, for low and high D/Rvir…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Velocity widths corresponding to 50% (∆v50) (left) and 90% (∆v90) (right) of the total optical depth for the bootstrapped-stacked spectra for each ion in the low D/Rvir and high D/Rvir bins. Larger ∆v50 values are found closer to the galaxies and for more highly ionise…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: (Left) Rest-frame equivalent width co-rotation fraction (measurement adopted from Nateghi et al. 2024a;b) for both low and high D/Rvir bins for HI and the metal lines. A value of unity implies all of the absorption is consistent with the direction of rotation of the ga…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_16.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Baryonic Ecosystem IN Galaxies (BEINGMgII) -- III. Cool gas reservoirs at $0.3 \le z \le 1.6$ in the Dark Energy Survey

    astro-ph.GA 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    New sample of 377 galaxies shows MgII absorber strength rising with redshift, positive correlations with stellar mass and SFR, clumpy CGM structure, and mostly bound gas consistent with galactic fountain recycling.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    2017, MNRAS, 470, 4698

    Anglés-Alcázar, D., Faucher-Giguère, C.-A., Kereš, D., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 470, 4698

    2017

  2. [2]

    2016, MNRAS, 462, 4157

    Armillotta, L., Fraternali, F., & Marinacci, F. 2016, MNRAS, 462, 4157

    2016

  3. [3]

    M., & Webb, J

    Barcons, X., Lanzettat, K. M., & Webb, J. K. 1995, Nature, 376, 321

    1995

  4. [4]

    L., Fumagalli, M., et al

    Beckett, A., Morris, S. L., Fumagalli, M., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 506, 2574

    2021

  5. [5]

    1986, A&A, 155, L8

    Bergeron, J. 1986, A&A, 155, L8

    1986

  6. [6]

    2003, MNRAS, 345, 349

    Birnboim, Y., & Dekel, A. 2003, MNRAS, 345, 349

    2003

  7. [7]

    Boksenberg, A., & Sargent, W. L. W. 1978, ApJ, 220, 42

    1978

  8. [8]

    J., Knobel, C., et al

    Bordoloi, R., Lilly, S. J., Knobel, C., et al. 2011, ApJ, 743, 10

    2011

Show all 88 references
  1. [9]

    J., Hardmeier, E., et al

    Bordoloi, R., Lilly, S. J., Hardmeier, E., et al. 2014, ApJ, 794, 130 Bouché, N., Hohensee, W., Vargas, R., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 426, 801 Bouché, N., Murphy, M. T., Kacprzak, G. G., et al. 2013, Science, 341, 50 Bouché, N., Finley, H., Schroetter, I., et al. 2016, ApJ, 820, 121

    2014

  2. [10]

    2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2203.15055

    Bradley, L., Davé, R., Cui, W., Smith, B., & Sorini, D. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2203.15055

    2022 arXiv

  3. [11]

    C., Gnat, O., & Brinboim, Y

    Bromberg, I., Sarkar, K. C., Gnat, O., & Brinboim, Y. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.18071

    2024 arXiv

  4. [12]

    L., & Norman, M

    Bryan, G. L., & Norman, M. L. 1998, ApJ, 495, 80

    1998

  5. [13]

    C., & Churchill, C

    Charlton, J. C., & Churchill, C. W. 1998, ApJ, 499, 181

    1998

  6. [14]

    E., Gauthier, J.-R., et al

    Chen, H.-W., Helsby, J. E., Gauthier, J.-R., et al. 2010, ApJ, 714, 1521

    2010

  7. [15]

    W., Evans, J

    Churchill, C. W., Evans, J. L., Stemock, B., et al. 2020, ApJ, 904, 28

    2020

  8. [16]

    W., Trujillo-Gomez, S., Nielsen, N

    Churchill, C. W., Trujillo-Gomez, S., Nielsen, N. M., & Kacprzak, G. G. 2013, ApJ, 779, 87, (MAGIICA T III)

    2013

  9. [17]

    W., & V ogt, S

    Churchill, C. W., & V ogt, S. S. 2001, AJ, 122, 679

    2001

  10. [18]

    F., Genel, S., et al

    DeFelippis, D., Bouché, N. F., Genel, S., et al. 2021, ApJ, 923, 56

    2021

  11. [19]

    2006, MNRAS, 368, 2

    Dekel, A., & Birnboim, Y. 2006, MNRAS, 368, 2

    2006

  12. [20]

    2000, in SPIE Conference Series, V ol

    Dekker, H., D’Odorico, S., Kaufer, A., Delabre, B., & Kotzlowski, H. 2000, in SPIE Conference Series, V ol. 4008, Optical and IR Telescope Instru- mentation and Detectors, ed. M. Iye & A. F. Moorwood, 534–545

    2000

  13. [21]

    J., Lang, D., et al

    Dey, A., Schlegel, D. J., Lang, D., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 168

    2019

  14. [22]

    M., Coil, A

    Diamond-Stanic, A. M., Coil, A. L., Moustakas, J., et al. 2016, ApJ, 824, 24

    2016

  15. [23]

    2025, ApJ, 985, 44

    Dutta, S., Muzahid, S., Schaye, J., et al. 2025, ApJ, 985, 44

    2025

  16. [24]

    2025, ApJ, 978, 63

    Favaro, J., Courteau, S., Comerón, S., & Stone, C. 2025, ApJ, 978, 63

    2025

  17. [25]

    2017, in Astrophysics and Space Science Library, V ol

    Fraternali, F. 2017, in Astrophysics and Space Science Library, V ol. 430, Gas Accretion onto Galaxies, ed. A. Fox & R. Davé, 323

    2017

  18. [26]

    M., & Wakker, B

    French, D. M., & Wakker, B. P. 2020, ApJ, 897, 151

    2020

  19. [27]

    2020, A&A, 634, A135

    Girelli, G., Pozzetti, L., Bolzonella, M., et al. 2020, A&A, 634, A135

    2020

  20. [28]

    Grand, R. J. J., van de V oort, F., Zjupa, J., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 490, 4786

    2019

  21. [29]

    C., Froning, C

    Green, J. C., Froning, C. S., Osterman, S., et al. 2012, ApJ, 744, 60

    2012

  22. [30]

    Guthrie, B. N. G. 1992, A&AS, 93, 255

    1992

  23. [31]

    2019, MNRAS, 488, 1248

    Hafen, Z., Faucher-Giguère, C.-A., Anglés-Alcázar, D., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 488, 1248

    2019

  24. [32]

    2022, MNRAS, 514, 5056

    Hafen, Z., Stern, J., Bullock, J., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 514, 5056

    2022

  25. [33]

    D., & Burke, B

    Haschick, A. D., & Burke, B. F. 1975, ApJ, 200, L137

    1975

  26. [34]

    H., Martin, C

    Ho, S. H., Martin, C. L., Kacprzak, G. G., & Churchill, C. W. 2017, ApJ, 835, 267

    2017

  27. [35]

    H., Martin, C

    Ho, S. H., Martin, C. L., Nateghi, H., Kacprzak, G. G., & Stern, J. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.11664

    2025

  28. [36]

    H., Martin, C

    Ho, S. H., Martin, C. L., & Schaye, J. 2021, ApJ, 923, 137

    2021

  29. [37]

    H., Martin, C

    Ho, S. H., Martin, C. L., & Turner, M. L. 2019, ApJ, 875, 54

    2019

  30. [38]

    A., et al

    Huang, Y.-H., Chen, H.-W., Shectman, S. A., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 502, 4743

    2021

  31. [39]

    G., Churchill, C

    Kacprzak, G. G., Churchill, C. W., Barton, E. J., & Cooke, J. 2011, ApJ, 733, 105

    2011

  32. [40]

    G., Churchill, C

    Kacprzak, G. G., Churchill, C. W., Ceverino, D., et al. 2010, ApJ, 711, 533

    2010

  33. [41]

    G., Churchill, C

    Kacprzak, G. G., Churchill, C. W., & Nielsen, N. M. 2012, ApJ, 760, L7

    2012

  34. [42]

    G., Churchill, C

    Kacprzak, G. G., Churchill, C. W., Steidel, C. C., Murphy, M. T., & Evans, J. L. 2007, ApJ, 662, 909

    2007

  35. [43]

    G., Muzahid, S., Churchill, C

    Kacprzak, G. G., Muzahid, S., Churchill, C. W., Nielsen, N. M., & Charlton, J. C. 2015, ApJ, 815, 22

    2015

  36. [44]

    G., Vander Vliet, J

    Kacprzak, G. G., Vander Vliet, J. R., Nielsen, N. M., et al. 2019, ApJ, 870, 137 Kereš, D., Katz, N., Weinberg, D. H., & Davé, R. 2005, MNRAS, 363, 2

    2019

  37. [45]

    J., Geller, M

    Kewley, L. J., Geller, M. J., & Jansen, R. A. 2004, AJ, 127, 2002

    2004

  38. [46]

    V., Kulkarni, V., Wake, D

    Klimenko, V. V., Kulkarni, V., Wake, D. A., et al. 2023, ApJ, 954, 115

    2023

  39. [47]

    2014, ApJ, 795, 31

    Lan, T.-W., Ménard, B., & Zhu, G. 2014, ApJ, 795, 31

    2014

  40. [48]

    2018, ApJ, 866, 36

    Lan, T.-W., & Mo, H. 2018, ApJ, 866, 36

    2018

  41. [49]

    M., & Bowen, D

    Lanzetta, K. M., & Bowen, D. V. 1992, ApJ, 391, 48

    1992

  42. [50]

    C., Howk, J

    Lehner, N., Berek, S. C., Howk, J. C., et al. 2020, ApJ, 900, 9 16 Glenn G. Kacprzak et al

    2020

  43. [51]

    C., Collins, L., et al

    Lehner, N., Howk, J. C., Collins, L., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.16573

    2025 arXiv

  44. [52]

    F., et al

    Lopez, S., Tejos, N., Barrientos, L. F., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 491, 4442

    2020

  45. [53]

    F., Creech, S., Brammer, G., et al

    Lundgren, B. F., Creech, S., Brammer, G., et al. 2021, ApJ, 913, 50

    2021

  46. [54]

    Marasco, A., Fraternali, F., & Binney, J. J. 2012, MNRAS, 419, 1107

    2012

  47. [55]

    2010, MNRAS, 404, 1464

    Marinacci, F., Binney, J., Fraternali, F., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 404, 1464

    2010

  48. [56]

    V., V ogelsberger, M., Torrey, P., & Springel, V

    Marinacci, F., Sales, L. V., V ogelsberger, M., Torrey, P., & Springel, V. 2019, MNRAS, 489, 4233

    2019

  49. [57]

    L., Burles, S., Thompson, I

    Marshall, J. L., Burles, S., Thompson, I. B., et al. 2008, in Society of Photo- Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, V ol. 7014, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy II, ed. I. S. McLean & M. M. Casali, 701454

    2008

  50. [58]

    L., Ho, S

    Martin, C. L., Ho, S. H., Kacprzak, G. G., & Churchill, C. W. 2019, ApJ, 878, 84

    2019

  51. [59]

    K., Cohen, J

    McCarthy, J. K., Cohen, J. G., Butcher, B., et al. 1998, in Society of Photo- Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, V ol. 3355, Optical Astronomical Instrumentation, ed. S. D’Odorico, 81–92

    1998

  52. [60]

    L., Kereš, D., Faucher-Giguère, C.-A., et al

    Muratov, A. L., Kereš, D., Faucher-Giguère, C.-A., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 468, 4170

    2017

  53. [61]

    2016, UVES_popler: POst-PipeLine Echelle Reduction software, doi:10.5281/zenodo.56158, doi:10.5281/zenodo.56158

    Murphy, M. 2016, UVES_popler: POst-PipeLine Echelle Reduction software, doi:10.5281/zenodo.56158, doi:10.5281/zenodo.56158

    2016 doi

  54. [62]

    T., Kacprzak, G

    Murphy, M. T., Kacprzak, G. G., Savorgnan, G. A. D., & Carswell, R. F. 2019, MNRAS, 482, 3458

    2019

  55. [63]

    2018, MNRAS, 477, 450

    Nelson, D., Kauffmann, G., Pillepich, A., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 477, 450

    2018

  56. [64]

    2020, MNRAS, 498, 2391

    Nelson, D., Sharma, P., Pillepich, A., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 498, 2391

    2020

  57. [65]

    M., Kacprzak, G

    Ng, M., Nielsen, N. M., Kacprzak, G. G., et al. 2019, ApJ, 886, 66

    2019

  58. [66]

    M., Kacprzak, G

    Nielsen, N. M., Kacprzak, G. G., Muzahid, S., et al. 2017, ApJ, 834, 148

    2017

  59. [67]

    B., Cohen, J

    Oke, J. B., Cohen, J. G., Carr, M., et al. 1995, PASP, 107, 375

    1995

  60. [68]

    Oppenheimer, B. D. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 2963

    2018

  61. [69]

    D., Crain, R

    Oppenheimer, B. D., Crain, R. A., Schaye, J., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 460, 2157

    2016

  62. [70]

    Y., Ho, L

    Peng, C. Y., Ho, L. C., Impey, C. D., & Rix, H.-W. 2010, AJ, 139, 2097 Péroux, C., Nelson, D., van de V oort, F., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 499, 2462

    2010

  63. [71]

    2021, MNRAS, 508, 4667

    Pillepich, A., Nelson, D., Truong, N., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 508, 4667

    2021

  64. [72]

    2020, The Journal of Open Source Software, 5, 2308

    Prochaska, J., Hennawi, J., Westfall, K., et al. 2020, The Journal of Open Source Software, 5, 2308

    2020

  65. [73]

    X., & W olfe, A

    Prochaska, J. X., & W olfe, A. M. 1997, ApJ, 487, 73

    1997

  66. [74]

    2018, MNRAS, 474, 254

    Rahmani, H., Péroux, C., Augustin, R., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 474, 254

    2018

  67. [75]

    C., Wakker, B

    Sameer, Charlton, J. C., Wakker, B. P., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 530, 3827

    2024

  68. [76]

    C., Kollmeier, J

    Steidel, C. C., Kollmeier, J. A., Shapley, A. E., et al. 2002, ApJ, 570, 526

    2002

  69. [77]

    2024, MNRAS, 530, 1711

    Stern, J., Fielding, D., Hafen, Z., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 530, 1711

    2024

  70. [78]

    2021, ApJ, 911, 88

    Stern, J., Faucher-Giguère, C.-A., Fielding, D., et al. 2021, ApJ, 911, 88

    2021

  71. [79]

    R., Brooks, A

    Stewart, K. R., Brooks, A. M., Bullock, J. S., et al. 2013, ApJ, 769, 74

    2013

  72. [80]

    R., Kaufmann, T., Bullock, J

    Stewart, K. R., Kaufmann, T., Bullock, J. S., et al. 2011, ApJ, 738, 39

    2011

  73. [81]

    R., Maller, A

    Stewart, K. R., Maller, A. H., Oñorbe, J., et al. 2017, ApJ, 843, 47

    2017

  74. [82]

    W., Kereš, D., Chan, T

    Trapp, C. W., Kereš, D., Chan, T. K., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 509, 4149

    2022

  75. [83]

    K., et al

    Tumlinson, J., Thom, C., Werk, J. K., et al. 2011, Science, 334, 948 van de V oort, F., Schaye, J., Booth, C. M., Haas, M. R., & Dalla Vecchia, C. 2011, MNRAS, 414, 2458 V ogt, N. P., Forbes, D. A., Phillips, A. C., et al. 1996, ApJ, 465, L15

    2011

  76. [84]

    Weisheit, J. C. 1978, ApJ, 219, 829

    1978

  77. [85]

    2024, MNRAS, 527, 3494

    Weng, S., Péroux, C., Ramesh, R., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 3494

    2024

  78. [86]

    K., Prochaska, J

    Werk, J. K., Prochaska, J. X., Cantalupo, S., et al. 2016, ApJ, 833, 54

    2016

  79. [87]

    2024, MNRAS, 527, 1612

    Yang, T., Davé, R., Cui, W., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 1612

    2024

  80. [88]

    F., Schroetter, I., et al

    Zabl, J., Bouché, N. F., Schroetter, I., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 485, 1961 Appendix 1. Individual Galaxy Gas–CGM Kinematic Com- parisons In this section, we show the remaining galaxies not shown in the manuscript (G1, G2, G3, G4, G5, G6 and G9). For each figure, the DECaLS grz col...

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.