Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 4 minor 257 references

A Review of Generative AI in Aquaculture: Foundations, Applications, and Future Directions for Smart and Sustainable Farming

T0 review · 5 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This review claims to be the first comprehensive synthesis of generative AI in aquaculture, and proposes a taxonomy that maps generative model families to every layer of smart aquaculture, from underwater sensing and robot mission…

desk verdict A useful but uneven review: the marine-robotics case study is solid, but the taxonomy's citation base overstates what's actually been demonstrated, and the 'first comprehensive' claim collides with a prior review the authors themselves cite. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.11974 v1 pith:ZJGRR7JS submitted 2025-07-16 cs.RO

Waseem Akram , Muhayy Ud Din , Lyes Saad Soud , Irfan Hussain This is my paper
classification cs.RO
keywords aquaculturegenerativeAIlargelanguagemodelsmarineroboticsdigitaltwindiffusionsmartfarming4.0
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review sets out to be the first comprehensive synthesis of generative AI in aquaculture, mapping generative model families—diffusion models, GANs, VAEs, large language models, retrieval-augmented generation, and vision-language models—onto tasks across sensing, robotics, planning, optimization, communication, and regulatory compliance. The intended payoff is a reliable map of what has actually been tried, where prototypes exist, and where gaps remain, so that researchers and practitioners can invest where evidence is strong. The review also argues that GAI is becoming a critical enabler of Aquaculture 4.0, with marine robotics as a flagship use case. A sympathetic reader would take the paper's main bet to be that the scattered literature can be unified under one taxonomy, and that this taxonomy exposes clear next steps for the field.

What carries the argument

The carrying structure is the application taxonomy of Table 2, which maps generative model families (GANs, VAEs, diffusion models, LLMs, retrieval-augmented generation, and vision-language models) to aquaculture use cases with datasets and evaluation methods, alongside Table 3's catalog of GAI/LLM marine-robotics systems. The taxonomy does the argumentative work: it converts scattered case studies into a grid that shows which model types are already paired with which tasks and which tasks remain unserved. The marine-robotics case studies and the proposed roadmap for responsible adoption carry the forward-looking claims.

What would settle it

Locate in the cited sources a diffusion-model study that trains an inspection robot on simulated biofouling of fish cages; if references [70,71] are the only support given, the taxonomy entry rests on a sonar-imagery review and a GAN-based underwater-image-enhancement paper rather than on a diffusion–robot experiment, and that row of the map would not stand as written.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that generative AI already touches every layer of the aquaculture value chain, and that a single application taxonomy can organize the field. The paper claims to be the first review to connect GAI to all key layers of smart aquaculture—from perception and automation to policy-level decision support—and to document real prototypes such as LLM-guided ROV mission planners, digital advisor chatbots, and GAI-blockchain traceability systems. It positions these not as isolated demos but as evidence that GAI is shifting from a theoretical possibility to an emerging design principle for marine robotics and farm management. The paper concludes that realizing this potential requires addressing data scarcity, real-time deployment constraints, interpretability, and regulatory safeguards.

Load-bearing premise

The review's taxonomy is only as accurate as its citations: it assumes each cited study actually deployed a generative model in aquaculture, rather than a non-generative deep-learning method or a system tested in a neighboring domain.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A reader can use the taxonomy to see where generative models have already been tested in aquaculture—perception, mission planning, advisory systems, reporting—and where the evidence is only adjacent or prototypical, setting priorities for new experiments.
  • If the synthesis holds, language-driven planning systems for ROVs and USVs become a practical baseline for aquaculture robotics, turning natural-language commands into mission plans that can be validated in simulation.
  • Digital twin and synthetic-data pipelines become a standard route to overcome data scarcity in underwater perception, with GAN and diffusion augmentation as the enabling layer for training inspection models.
  • The roadmap's proposed directions—multimodal fusion, federated learning, domain-specific pretraining, and standardized benchmarks—would, if followed, make GAI aquaculture systems more reliable, comparable, and easier to deploy at the edge.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A skeptical reader should treat each taxonomy row as a claim to verify against the primary source; several rows appear to cite non-generative deep learning or adjacent-domain systems, so the truly proven core of the map may be smaller than the table suggests.
  • The paper's emphasis on data scarcity implies a testable extension: measure how much synthetic underwater imagery from diffusion models improves downstream net-inspection segmentation relative to real data, which would quantify the load-bearing benefit of synthetic generation.
  • If the proposed federated and domain-pretraining directions are followed, the field would need an aquaculture-specific benchmark suite to compare generalist foundation models against domain-specialized ones; the paper calls for such benchmarks but does not build them.
  • Because the review treats regulatory compliance as an application layer, a natural extension is a regulatory-grade evaluation of LLM-generated compliance documents against official legal frameworks, a test the paper identifies as open.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review of generative AI (GAI) applications in aquaculture. It introduces core GAI architectures, proposes an application taxonomy spanning sensing, robotics, planning, optimization, communication, and compliance, surveys case studies in marine robotics (Table 3), and discusses limitations and future directions. The central claim is that it provides the first comprehensive synthesis of GAI in aquaculture and a reliable map of demonstrated generative-model use across the sector.

Significance. If the synthesis were accurate, it would be a useful entry point for researchers and practitioners, organizing a rapidly growing literature and identifying gaps. The paper's Table 3 catalog of LLM-based marine robotics systems (e.g., OceanChat, OceanPlan, Word2Wave) is concrete and largely well-chosen, and the discussion of deployment barriers (Section 5) is balanced and thoughtful. However, the value of a review stands or falls on the accuracy of its citation base; the specific mis-citations and overclaims identified below are load-bearing for the paper's central promise of a reliable map of proven GAI capabilities.

major comments (5)
  1. [3.1.1] The sentence beginning 'For example, generative diffusion models have been used successfully to simulate diverse biofouling conditions on fish cages...' (p.7) is not supported by the cited references. Reference [70] is a review of deep learning for sonar imagery analysis, and [71] is a GAN-based underwater image enhancement paper; neither reports diffusion-based simulation of biofouling or robots trained on such synthetic data. This is a concrete instance of the review presenting adjacent or non-generative work as demonstrated GAI application, which directly undermines the stated goal of mapping what has actually been tested.
  2. [3.1.2] The claim that 'deep learning has been effectively utilized to synthesize realistic visual data representing diseases such as sea lice infestations, fungal infections, or bacterial diseases [76]' is supported only by a 2005 disease-management review (Bondad-Reantaso et al.) that contains no generative modeling. The passage should be rewritten to distinguish between disease detection using discriminative deep learning and actual generative synthesis of disease imagery, or it should cite primary studies that perform such synthesis.
  3. [3.4.3] The statement that 'practical deployments of combined GAI-blockchain systems have already been explored in sustainable shrimp farming initiatives in Southeast Asia [209], such as IBM Food Trust pilots in Vietnam and Thailand [210,211,212]' is not supported by the cited references. [209] describes an IBM Food Trust blockchain pilot without a generative component, and [211] is a general manufacturing quality-control paper. These citations do not demonstrate GAI-blockchain deployment in aquaculture, so the claim should be corrected to reflect that such integration is at most a proposal or adjacent development.
  4. [Table 2] Table 2 is central to the paper's contribution as a 'structured mapping of GAI techniques to aquaculture tasks,' but many rows list models that are not generative at all (e.g., CNNs/LSTMs, YOLOv8, AIoT frameworks, and drone-based visual models). This conflation of general deep learning with GAI is not limited to one row; it recurs across the table and in the surrounding text of Section 3. Without a clear distinction between generative and non-generative methods, the table does not yet deliver the promised GAI-specific synthesis.
  5. [Introduction] The abstract and Introduction claim 'the first comprehensive synthesis of GAI applications in aquaculture,' but the authors themselves cite Fini et al. [13]/[38], a prior review titled 'Application of generative artificial intelligence in the aquacultural sector' (Aquacultural Engineering, 2025). The manuscript needs to either identify a precise scope difference (e.g., the robotics/planning/compliance emphasis) or soften the novelty claim; in its current form the claim is contradicted by the authors' own bibliography.
minor comments (4)
  1. [References] References [13] and [38] are identical (Fini et al.), and references [8] and [40] appear to be the same work (Aung et al., 2025); these duplicates should be consolidated.
  2. [Figure 3] Figure 3 reports a Scopus count, but the search query, date, and inclusion criteria are not stated; a brief methodological note would improve reproducibility.
  3. [p.20] The section title 'Decleration' should be 'Declaration'.
  4. [Section 4.1] The phrase 'GPT and SLM-based models' uses 'SLM' without defining it; if it refers to small language models, it should be spelled out on first use.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the review's synthesis and taxonomy are not derived from its own inputs or self-citations.

full rationale

This paper is a literature review, not a derivation with equations or fitted parameters, so the main circularity patterns (self-definitional claims, fitted inputs called predictions, uniqueness imported from authors, ansatz smuggled via citation) do not apply. The central contribution is a taxonomy and synthesis of cited work. The authors' self-citations ([74], [95], [97], [98], [103]) are used for illustrative figures, background on underwater vision, and general support; none of these is the sole load-bearing evidence for the review's conclusions. Several passages do cite references that do not clearly demonstrate generative AI in aquaculture (e.g., Section 3.1.1 cites [70] and [71] for diffusion-based biofouling simulation, but those are a sonar-imagery review and a GAN-based enhancement paper), and the claim of being the 'first comprehensive synthesis' is in tension with the paper's own citation [13], which is a prior review of GAI in aquaculture. These are accuracy, support, and novelty concerns, not circularity: the review's claims are not true by construction, and no cited result is equivalent to the paper's own output. Accordingly, the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review introduces no free parameters or invented entities. Its burden lies in assumptions about field boundaries and the reliability of its references.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Generative AI includes LLMs, diffusion models, GANs, VAEs, and RAG, and these are applicable to the aquaculture tasks listed.
    The whole taxonomy depends on this grouping; the paper applies it broadly, including to non-generative deep learning in Table 2.
  • domain assumption The cited literature accurately describes GAI systems and their performance in aquaculture.
    The review does not run experiments; it trusts its references, several of which do not support the stated claims (e.g., Section 3.1.1).
  • domain assumption The Scopus publication trend in Figure 3 is representative of the field.
    Search terms and retrieval date are given only loosely as 'GAI' or 'AI' in aquaculture, so the curve cannot be independently verified.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Review of Generative AI in Aquaculture: Foundations, Applications, and Future Directions for Smart and Sustainable Farming." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZJGRR7JS

@misc{pith2026250711974,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Review of Generative AI in Aquaculture: Foundations, Applications, and Future Directions for Smart and Sustainable Farming},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZJGRR7JS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.11974}
}
read the original abstract

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) has rapidly emerged as a transformative force in aquaculture, enabling intelligent synthesis of multimodal data, including text, images, audio, and simulation outputs for smarter, more adaptive decision-making. As the aquaculture industry shifts toward data-driven, automation and digital integration operations under the Aquaculture 4.0 paradigm, GAI models offer novel opportunities across environmental monitoring, robotics, disease diagnostics, infrastructure planning, reporting, and market analysis. This review presents the first comprehensive synthesis of GAI applications in aquaculture, encompassing foundational architectures (e.g., diffusion models, transformers, and retrieval augmented generation), experimental systems, pilot deployments, and real-world use cases. We highlight GAI's growing role in enabling underwater perception, digital twin modeling, and autonomous planning for remotely operated vehicle (ROV) missions. We also provide an updated application taxonomy that spans sensing, control, optimization, communication, and regulatory compliance. Beyond technical capabilities, we analyze key limitations, including limited data availability, real-time performance constraints, trust and explainability, environmental costs, and regulatory uncertainty. This review positions GAI not merely as a tool but as a critical enabler of smart, resilient, and environmentally aligned aquaculture systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.11974 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Applications of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) in smart aquaculture, spanning automation, autonomous robotics, decision support, and optimization. [7, 8]. Foundation models such as ChatGPT, DALL·E, and diffusion-based generators are increasingly being applied as core building blocks for next-generation aquaculture plat￾forms [9, 10]. W. Akram et al.: Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 1 of 26 arXiv:2507.1… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Structure of the review, organized around key thematic areas in which GAI contributes to aquaculture. The paper covers core models, applications, use cases, challenges, and future research directions. As illustrated in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Growth of Scopus-indexed literature on GAI models and applications in the aquaculture sector from 2021 to 2025. Data retrieved in June 2025. creative, context-aware generation across diverse modali￾ties. At its foundation, GAI involves models that learn the underlying probabilistic structure of input data and apply this understanding to autonomously synthesize outputs such as text, images, audio, video, and simulati… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Generalized architecture of a Generative AI system. Diverse input modalities such as images, text, audio, and sensor data are processed through an encoder-decoder transformer. Outputs include images, simulations, audio, and text reports [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_f…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Automatic aquaculture inspection using ROV. (a) shows an ROV during aquaculture net pens inspection, (b) shows an example of the hole on the net, (c) shows an example of biofouling defects on the net, and (d) shows an example of vegetation attached to the net [PITH_FU…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Automated segmentation of underwater aquaculture net images, showing raw images and corresponding masks for biofouling (light green), clean net and background (black), and vegetation (cyan) to support accurate monitoring and data interpretation. Image courtesy of [74].…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Examples of robotics and automation applications in aquaculture: (A) underwater robot inspecting a fish net, (B) autonomous navigation and inspection planning, (C) real￾time net detection and distance estimation, and (D) net defect detection and annotation. effective s…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Common environmental sensors used in aquaculture monitoring: (1) wave sensor, (2) multi-parameter sensor, (3) temperature sensor, (4) oxygen and pH observer, and (5) pressure sensor. Images courtesy of [90, 91, 92, 93]. forecast the occurrence of these critical environ…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Illustration of a Digital Twin framework enhanced with GAI for aquaculture robotics. The virtual model simulates real-time conditions and hypothetical scenarios to support optimal control, decision-making, and predictive analytics. robotic systems for swift autonomous…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: GAI-enabled architecture for collaborative multi￾agent aquaculture operations. The framework couples plan generation using foundation models with distributed execution across autonomous ROVs for real-time inspection and coordi￾nation. distributed feeding schedules, an…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Illustration of GAI-based planning and optimization in aquaculture, highlighting key application areas including in￾frastructure design, precision feeding, breeding strategies, and waste management for enhanced sustainability and operational efficiency. complex intera…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: GAI-based communication and reporting in aqua￾culture. Applications include personalized digital advisory, regulatory compliance support, blockchain-enabled traceabil￾ity, training, and market analysis. These practices generate outputs such as multilingual chatbots, d…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

257 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

  1. [13]

    C. Fini, S. G. Amato, D. Scutaru, S. Biancardi, F. Antonucci, S. Violino, L. Ortenzi, E. N. Nemmi, A. Mei, F. Pallottino, et al., Application of generative artificial intelligence in the aquacultural sector, Aquacultural Engineering (2025) 102568

    2025

  2. [70]

    Y.Chai,H.Yu,L.Xu,D.Li,Y.Chen, Deeplearningalgorithmsfor sonar imagery analysis and its application in aquaculture: A review, IEEE Sensors Journal 23 (2023) 28549–28563

    2023

  3. [71]

    Panetta, L

    K. Panetta, L. Kezebou, V. Oludare, S. Agaian, Comprehensive underwaterobjecttrackingbenchmarkdatasetandunderwaterimage enhancement with gan, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering 47 (2021) 59–75

    2021

  4. [76]

    M. G. Bondad-Reantaso, R. P. Subasinghe, J. R. Arthur, K. Ogawa, S. Chinabut, R. Adlard, Z. Tan, M. Shariff, Disease and health management in asian aquaculture, Veterinary parasitology 132 (2005) 249–272

    2005

  5. [209]

    Chase, Nfi, sirf partner on seafood blockchain pilot with ibm, SeafoodSource, 2019

    C. Chase, Nfi, sirf partner on seafood blockchain pilot with ibm, SeafoodSource, 2019. URL: https: //www.seafoodsource.com/news/environment-sustainability/ nfi-sirf-partner-on-seafood-blockchain-pilot-with-ibm , national FisheriesInstituteandSeafoodIndustryResearchFundpartnerwith IBM Food Trust for seafood supply chain traceability

    work page 2019

  6. [211]

    M.R.Islam,M.Z.H.Zamil,M.E.Rayed,M.M.Kabir,M.Mridha, S.Nishimura,J.Shin,Deeplearningandcomputervisiontechniques for enhanced quality control in manufacturing processes, IEEE Access (2024)

    work page 2024

  7. [38]

    C. Fini, S. Amato, D. Scutaru, C. Costa, Application of generative artificial intelligence in the aquacultural sector, Aquacultural Engi- neering (2025)

    2025

  8. [1]

    Subasinghe, D

    R. Subasinghe, D. Soto, J. Jia, Global aquaculture and its role in sustainable development, Reviews in aquaculture 1 (2009) 2–9

    2009

Show all 257 references
  1. [2]

    URL: https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/ a2090042-8cda-4f35-9881-16f6302ce757/content , accessed: 2025- 05-21

    FAO, The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2022: Towards Blue Transformation, FAO, Rome, 2022. URL: https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/ a2090042-8cda-4f35-9881-16f6302ce757/content , accessed: 2025- 05-21

    2022

  2. [3]

    Biazi, C

    V. Biazi, C. Marques, Industry 4.0-based smart systems in aquacul- ture:Acomprehensivereview,AquaculturalEngineering103(2023) 102360

    2023

  3. [4]

    Mandal, A

    A. Mandal, A. R. Ghosh, Role of artificial intelligence (ai) in fish growth and health status monitoring: a review on sustainable aquaculture, Aquaculture International 32 (2024) 2791–2820

    2024

  4. [5]

    R.Bommasani,D.A.Hudson,E.Adeli,R.Altman,S.Arora,S.von Arx, M. S. Bernstein, J. Bohg, A. Bosselut, E. Brunskill, et al., On the opportunities and risks of foundation models, arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.07258 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  5. [6]

    Akkem, S

    Y. Akkem, S. K. Biswas, A. Varanasi, A comprehensive review of synthetic data generation in smart farming by using variational autoencoder and generative adversarial network, Engineering Ap- plications of Artificial Intelligence 131 (2024) 107881

    2024

  6. [7]

    S. H. Vemprala, R. Bonatti, A. Bucker, A. Kapoor, Chatgpt for robotics:Designprinciplesandmodelabilities, IeeeAccess(2024)

    2024

  7. [8]

    T. Aung, R. Abdul Razak, A. Rahiman Bin Md Nor, Artificial intelligence methods used in various aquaculture applications: A systematic literature review, Journal of the World Aquaculture Society 56 (2025) e13107

    2025

  8. [9]

    L. Yang, Z. Zhang, Y. Song, S. Hong, R. Xu, Y. Zhao, W. Zhang, B. Cui, M.-H. Yang, Diffusion models: A comprehensive survey of methods and applications, ACM Computing Surveys 56 (2023) 1–39

    2023

  9. [10]

    C. Wang, Z. Li, T. Wang, X. Xu, X. Zhang, D. Li, Intelligent fish farm—the future of aquaculture, Aquaculture International (2021) 1–31

    2021

  10. [11]

    Y. Ma, Z. Song, Y. Zhuang, J. Hao, I. King, A survey on vision-language-action models for embodied ai, arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.14093 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  11. [12]

    J. Wen, Y. Zhu, J. Li, M. Zhu, Z. Tang, K. Wu, Z. Xu, N. Liu, R. Cheng, C. Shen, et al., Tinyvla: Towards fast, data-efficient vision-language-action models for robotic manipulation, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters (2025)

    2025

  12. [14]

    Trigka, E

    M. Trigka, E. Dritsas, The evolution of generative ai: Trends and applications, IEEE Access (2025)

    2025

  13. [15]

    Balasubramaniam, V

    S. Balasubramaniam, V. Chirchi, S. Kadry, T. Sivakumar, The road ahead: Emerging trends, unresolved issues, and concluding remarks in generative ai—a comprehensive review, International Journal of Intelligent Systems (2024)

    2024

  14. [16]

    J. Li, C. Zhang, W. Zhu, Y. Ren, A comprehensive survey of image generation models based on deep learning, Annals of Data Science (2025)

    2025

  15. [17]

    Aymen, A

    F. Aymen, A. Pester, F. Andres, Synthetic water crystal image generation using vae-gans and diffusion models, in: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 2024

    2024

  16. [18]

    Accessed: 2025-06-17

    OpenAI,Chatgpt:Optimizinglanguagemodelsfordialogue, https: //openai.com/blog/chatgpt, 2023. Accessed: 2025-06-17

    2023

  17. [19]

    K. Kim, K. Cho, R. Jang, N. Kim, Updated primer on generative artificialintelligenceandlargelanguagemodelsinmedicalimaging for medical professionals, Korean Journal of Radiology (2024)

    2024

  18. [20]

    P.Rouzrokh,B.Khosravi,S.Faghani,B.Erickson, Acurrentreview ofgenerativeaiinmedicine:Coreconcepts,applications,andcurrent limitations, Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine (2025)

    2025

  19. [21]

    Akram et al.:Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 20 of 26 A Review of Generative AI in Smart Aquaculture Machine Intelligence 45 (2023) 10850–10869

    F.-A.Croitoru,V.Hondru,R.T.Ionescu,M.Shah, Diffusionmodels in vision: A survey, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and W. Akram et al.:Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 20 of 26 A Review of Generative AI in Smart Aquaculture Machine Intelligence 45 (2023) 10850–10869

    2023

  20. [22]

    Pinheiro Cinelli, M

    L. Pinheiro Cinelli, M. Araújo Marins, E. A. Barros da Silva, S. Lima Netto, Variational autoencoder, in: Variational methods for machine learning with applications to deep networks, Springer, 2021, pp. 111–149

    2021

  21. [23]

    C. Li, T. Zhang, X. Du, H. Xie, Generative ai models for different steps in architectural design: A literature review, Frontiers of Architectural Research (2025)

    2025

  22. [24]

    Mitra, I

    R. Mitra, I. Zualkernan, Music generation using deep learning and generative ai: A systematic review, IEEE Access (2025)

    2025

  23. [25]

    Waisberg, J

    E. Waisberg, J. Ong, S. Kamran, A. Tavakkoli, Generative artificial intelligence in ophthalmology, Survey of Ophthalmology (2025)

    2025

  24. [26]

    Huang, T

    L. Huang, T. Oki, Enhancing people’s walking preferences in street design through generative artificial intelligence and crowdsourcing surveys: The case of tokyo, Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science (2025)

    2025

  25. [27]

    K.Kaswan,J.Dhatterwal,K.Malik,A.Baliyan, Generativeai:Are- viewonmodelsandapplications, in:2023InternationalConference on Communication, Security and Artificial Intelligence (ICCSAI), 2023

    2023

  26. [28]

    Saxena, J

    D. Saxena, J. Cao, Generative adversarial networks (gans) chal- lenges, solutions, and future directions, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 54 (2021) 1–42

    2021

  27. [29]

    Rombach, A

    R. Rombach, A. Blattmann, D. Lorenz, P. Esser, B. Ommer, High- resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models, arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.10752, 2022. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2112.10752

    2022 arXiv

  28. [30]

    AI, Deepseek-vl: Vision-language large model,https://github

    D. AI, Deepseek-vl: Vision-language large model,https://github. com/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-VL, 2024. Accessed: 2025-06-17

    2024

  29. [31]

    Ramesh, M

    A. Ramesh, M. Pavlov, G. Goh, S. Gray, C. Voss, A. Radford, M. Chen, I. Sutskever, Zero-shot text-to-image generation, arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.12092, 2021. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2102.12092

    2021 arXiv

  30. [32]

    J. Li, M. Xu, L. Xiang, D. Chen, W. Zhuang, X. Yin, Z. Li, Foundation models in smart agriculture: Basics, opportunities, and challenges, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 222 (2024) 109032

    2024

  31. [33]

    Ubina, S

    N. Ubina, S. Cheng, H. Chen, H. Lan, A visual aquaculture system using a cloud-based autonomous drones, Drones (2021)

    2021

  32. [34]

    S. Roy, M. Beg, S. Bhagat, T. Kim, Application of artificial intelligence in aquaculture – recent developments and prospects, Aquacultural Engineering (2025)

    2025

  33. [35]

    H.Yang,Q.Feng,S.Xia,Y.Zhang,Ai-drivenaquaculture:Areview oftechnologicalinnovationsandtheirsustainableimpacts, Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture (2025)

    2025

  34. [36]

    J. Kong, S. Tang, J. Feng, X. Jin, Aasnet: A novel image instance segmentation framework for fine-grained fish recognition, Applied Sciences (2025)

    2025

  35. [37]

    Sundaravadivel, P

    P. Sundaravadivel, P. Roselyn, V. Narayanaswamy, A. Khanal, Inte- grating image-based llms on edge-devices for underwater robotics, in: SPIE Proceedings, 2024

    2024

  36. [39]

    Fortino, S

    A. Fortino, S. Gaur, Generative artificial intelligence as the killer app: Revolutionizing human–robot interaction, in: Synergy of AI and Fintech in the Digital Gig Economy, Springer, 2025

    2025

  37. [40]

    T. Aung, R. Abdul Razak, A. Rahiman Bin Md Nor, Artificial intelligence methods used in various aquaculture applications: A systematic literature review, Journal of the World Aquaculture Society (2025)

    2025

  38. [41]

    Ragab, S

    S. Ragab, S. Hoseinifar, H. Van Doan, E. El-Haroun, Overview of aquaculture artificial intelligence (aai) applications: Enhance sustainability and productivity, reduce labor costs, and increase the quality of aquatic products, Annals of Animal Science (2025)

    2025

  39. [42]

    Jasmin, P

    A. Jasmin, P. Ramesh, M. Tanveer, Development of artificial intelligence-based chatbot for smart aquafarm practices, Expert Systems (2024)

    2024

  40. [43]

    Bhusan, S

    S. Bhusan, S. Iburahim, J. Akash, U. Arisekar, Emerging trends in information technology with reference to fisheries and aquaculture, Information Technology in Fisheries and Aquaculture (2025)

    2025

  41. [44]

    Y.Zhang,Y.Liu,Z.Jiong,E.Chen, Developmentandassessmentof blockchain-iot-based traceability system for frozen aquatic product, Journal of Food Process Engineering (2021)

    2021

  42. [45]

    Narang, A

    G. Narang, A. Galdelli, A. Tassetti, A. Mancini, Precision aqua- culture framework for remote mussel growth monitoring with iot blockchain and cloud integration, in: IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for the Sea (MetroSea), 2024

    2024

  43. [46]

    D. Roy, M. Padhiary, P. Roy, J. Barbhuiya, Artificial intelligence- driven smart aquaculture: Revolutionizing sustainability through automation and machine learning, LatIA (2024)

    2024

  44. [47]

    Krivoguz, A

    D. Krivoguz, A. Ioshpa, S. Chernyi, K. Gritsenko, Real-time epizootic monitoring with inception dnn for maritime applications, Transactions on Maritime Science (2025)

    2025

  45. [48]

    N.Shang,C.Zhang,W.Zhang,Y.Zhang, Assessmentoffishhealth status for waterless transportation via deep learning, Aquaculture (2025)

    2025

  46. [49]

    H.Zhang,Z.Tian,L.Liu,L.Zeng, Real-timedetectionofdeadfish forunmannedaquaculturebyyolov8-baseduav,Aquaculture(2025)

    2025

  47. [50]

    Zhang, J

    Z. Zhang, J. Li, C. Su, C. Liu, A method for counting fish based on improved yolov8, Aquacultural Engineering (2024)

    2024

  48. [51]

    Steele, R

    S. Steele, R. Ranjan, K. Sharrer, C. Good, Computer-simulated virtual image datasets to train ml models for non-invasive fish detection, Sensors (2024)

    2024

  49. [52]

    P.Arepalli,J.Naik,J.Rout, Aquaculturewaterqualityclassification with sparse attention transformers, in: ACM ICPS, 2024

    2024

  50. [53]

    S.Kanwal,M.Abdullah,S.Kumar,D.Kumar,Anoptimaliot-driven decision-making system for real-time fishpond monitoring, Sensors (2024)

    2024

  51. [54]

    Bendel, N

    O. Bendel, N. Zbinden, The animal whisperer project, in: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 2024

    2024

  52. [55]

    Huang, S

    Y.-P. Huang, S. Khabusi, Artificial intelligence of things (aiot) advances in aquaculture: A review, Processes (2025)

    2025

  53. [56]

    Fortino, S

    A. Fortino, S. Gaur, Generative artificial intelligence as the killer app: Revolutionizing human–robot interaction, in: Synergy of AI and Fintech in the Digital Gig Economy, Springer, 2024

    2024

  54. [57]

    Srikanth, V

    M. Srikanth, V. Varma, S. Aziz, V. Bharath, Ai-optimised model for resource management in aquaculture-agriculture systems, in: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing and Intelligent Information Systems (ICUIS), 2024

    2024

  55. [58]

    Rafiq, S

    K. Rafiq, S. Beery, M. Palmer, B. Abrahms, Generative ai as a tool to accelerate the field of ecology, Nature Ecology and Evolution (2025)

    2025

  56. [59]

    Pallottino, S

    F. Pallottino, S. Violino, S. Figorilli, L. Ortenzi, Applications and perspectives of generative artificial intelligence in agriculture, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture (2025)

    2025

  57. [60]

    E.Gogou,I.Semenoglou,A.Grasmann,P.Taoukis,Implementation of blockchain in food supply chains: Field test monitoring of fresh aquaculture fish cold chain, in: Refrigeration Science and Technol- ogy, 2020

    2020

  58. [61]

    Sevin, S

    S. Sevin, S. Dikel, Building a collaborative aquaculture research ecosystem with apis and ai, Aquatic Sciences and Engineering (2025)

    2025

  59. [62]

    Weichelt, M

    B. Weichelt, M. Pilz, R. Burke, K. Namkoong, The potential of ai andchatgptinimprovingagriculturalinjuryandillnesssurveillance programming and dissemination, Journal of Agromedicine (2024)

    2024

  60. [63]

    S.Qiao,H.Yu,J.Song,W.Huang, Tda-glm:textdataaugmentation for aquaculture disease prevention and control via a small model- guided chatglm, Aquaculture International (2025)

    2025

  61. [64]

    Nugraha, I

    F. Nugraha, I. Saputra, H. Triana, Sumanto, From traditional to innovation: Large language models in fisheries data extraction, in: ICITRI 2024, 2024

    2024

  62. [65]

    Z. Li, S. Zhang, P. Cao, Z. An, Research on fine-tuning strategies for text classification in the aquaculture domain by combining deep learning and large language models, Aquaculture International (2025). W. Akram et al.:Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 21 of 26 A Review of...

    2025

  63. [66]

    Jiang, R

    L. Jiang, R. Zhao, C. Dong, S. Fang, Construction and verification of the visual knowledge map of aquatic diseases based on deep learning, Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao (2023)

    2023

  64. [67]

    Leite, J

    M. Leite, J. Abe, M. Souza, I. de Alencar Nääs, Enhancing envi- ronmental control in broiler production: Retrieval-augmented gen- eration for improved decision-making with large language models, AgriEngineering (2025)

    2025

  65. [68]

    K. Pugh, M. Musavi, T. Johnson, B. Pugh, Neural nets for sus- tainability conversations: modeling discussion disciplines and their impacts, Neural Computing and Applications (2023)

    2023

  66. [69]

    Rahman, M

    A. Rahman, M. Xi, J. J. Dabrowski, J. McCulloch, S. Arnold, M. Rana, A. George, M. Adcock, An integrated framework of sensing, machine learning, and augmented reality for aquaculture prawn farm management, Aquacultural Engineering 95 (2021) 102192

    2021

  67. [72]

    M. Á. González-Santamarta, F. J. Rodríguez-Lera, Á. M. Guerrero- Higueras,V.Matellán-Olivera, Integrationoflargelanguagemodels withincognitivearchitecturesforautonomousrobots, arXivpreprint arXiv:2309.14945 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  68. [73]

    Elmezain, L

    M. Elmezain, L. S. Saoud, A. Sultan, M. Heshmat, L. Seneviratne, I.Hussain, Advancingunderwatervision:Asurveyofdeeplearning modelsforunderwaterobjectrecognitionandtracking, IEEEAccess (2025)

    2025

  69. [74]

    Akram, T

    W. Akram, T. Hassan, H. Toubar, M. Ahmed, N. Miškovic, L. Seneviratne, I. Hussain, Aquaculture defects recognition via multi-scale semantic segmentation, Expert systems with applica- tions 237 (2024) 121197

    2024

  70. [75]

    Assefa, F

    A. Assefa, F. Abunna, Maintenance of fish health in aquaculture: review of epidemiological approaches for prevention and control of infectious disease of fish, Veterinary medicine international 2018 (2018) 5432497

    2018

  71. [77]

    K. Kim, H. Myung, Autoencoder-combined generative adversarial networks for synthetic image data generation and detection of jelly- fish swarm, IEEE Access 6 (2018) 54207–54214

    2018

  72. [78]

    Gupta, E

    A. Gupta, E. Bringsdal, K. M. Knausgård, M. Goodwin, Accurate wound and lice detection in atlantic salmon fish using a convolu- tional neural network, Fishes 7 (2022) 345

    2022

  73. [79]

    D. Li, X. Li, Q. Wang, Y. Hao, Advanced techniques for the intelligent diagnosis of fish diseases: A review, Animals 12 (2022) 2938

    2022

  74. [80]

    Zhang, Y

    T. Zhang, Y. Yang, Y. Liu, C. Liu, R. Zhao, D. Li, C. Shi, Fully automatic system for fish biomass estimation based on deep neural network, Ecological Informatics 79 (2024) 102399

    2024

  75. [81]

    Abinaya, D

    N. Abinaya, D. Susan, R. K. Sidharthan, Deep learning-based segmental analysis of fish for biomass estimation in an occulted environment, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 197 (2022) 106985

    2022

  76. [82]

    Zahir, Y

    M. Zahir, Y. Su, M. I. Shahzad, G. Ayub, S. U. Rehman, J. Ijaz, A review on monitoring, forecasting, and early warning of harmful algal bloom, Aquaculture (2024) 741351

    2024

  77. [83]

    Accessed: 2025-05-27

    IEEE Spectrum, Aquaculture, https://spectrum.ieee.org/ aquaculture, 2024. Accessed: 2025-05-27

    2024

  78. [84]

    innovasea.com/aquaculture-intelligence/biomass-estimation/,

    Innovasea, Biomass estimation for aquaculture, https://www. innovasea.com/aquaculture-intelligence/biomass-estimation/,

  79. [85]

    A. N. America, Google sister company helps usher in precision aquaculture, https://www.aquaculturenorthamerica.com/ google-sister-company-helps-usher-in-precision-aquaculture/ ,

  80. [86]

    English, M

    G. English, M. J. Lawrence, C. W. McKindsey, A. Lacoursière- Roussel, H. Bergeron, S. Gauthier, B. F. Wringe, M. Trudel, A reviewofdatacollectionmethodsusedtomonitortheassociationsof wild species with marine aquaculture sites, Reviews in Aquaculture 16 (2024) 1160–1185

    2024

  81. [87]

    Q. Ren, X. Wang, W. Li, Y. Wei, D. An, Research of dissolved oxygen prediction in recirculating aquaculture systems based on deep belief network, Aquacultural Engineering 90 (2020) 102085

    2020

  82. [88]

    E. Eze, T. Ajmal, Dissolved oxygen forecasting in aquaculture: A hybrid model approach, Applied Sciences 10 (2020) 7079

    2020

  83. [89]

    Pachaiyappan, G

    P. Pachaiyappan, G. Chidambaram, A. Jahid, M. H. Alsharif, En- hancing underwater object detection and classification using ad- vancedimagingtechniques:anovelapproachwithdiffusionmodels, Sustainability 16 (2024) 7488

    2024

  84. [90]

    yosemitech.com/MULTI/Y4003-Deep-Water-Multi-parameter-Sensor

    Yosemitech, Y4003 deep water multi-parameter sensor,https://e. yosemitech.com/MULTI/Y4003-Deep-Water-Multi-parameter-Sensor. html, 2024. Accessed: 2025-05-27

    2024

  85. [91]

    T. I. Ltd, Water temperature logger sensor,https://www.tempcon. co.uk/data-loggers/underwater/water-temperature-logger-sensor ,

  86. [92]

    Magazine, Autonomous sensor solutions for ocean ph and oxygen observations, https://ecomagazine.com/in-depth/ autonomous-sensor-solutions-for-ocean-ph-and-oxygen-observations/ ,

    E. Magazine, Autonomous sensor solutions for ocean ph and oxygen observations, https://ecomagazine.com/in-depth/ autonomous-sensor-solutions-for-ocean-ph-and-oxygen-observations/ ,

  87. [93]

    O. S. Technology, Underwater pressure sensors, https://www.oceansciencetechnology.com/suppliers/ underwater-pressure-sensors/, 2024. Accessed: 2025-05-27

    2024

  88. [94]

    J. Li, X. Zhang, Q. Hu, F. Zhang, O. Gaida, L. Chen, Data augmentation technique based on improved time-series generative adversarial networks for power load forecasting in recirculating aquaculture systems, Sustainability 16 (2024) 10721

    2024

  89. [95]

    L.SaadSaoud,Z.Niu,A.Sultan,L.Seneviratne,I.Hussain, Adod: Adaptive domain-aware object detection with residual attention for underwater environments, in: 2023 21st International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR), 2023, pp. 633–638. doi:10.1109/ ICAR58858.2023.10436502

    2023

  90. [96]

    Accessed: 2025-05-27

    2025

  91. [97]

    Hussain, Seeing through the haze: A comprehensive review of underwaterimageenhancementtechniques, IEEEAccess12(2024) 145206–145233

    L.SaadSaoud,M.Elmezain,A.Sultan,M.Heshmat,L.Seneviratne, I. Hussain, Seeing through the haze: A comprehensive review of underwaterimageenhancementtechniques, IEEEAccess12(2024) 145206–145233

    2024

  92. [98]

    Saad Saoud, Z

    L. Saad Saoud, Z. Niu, L. Seneviratne, I. Hussain, Real-time and resource-efficient multi-scale adaptive robotics vision for underwa- ter object detection and domain generalization, in: 2024 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), 2024, pp. 3917–3923. doi:10....

    2024

  93. [99]

    D. Guihen, The challenges and opportunities for the use of robotic autonomous robotic systems in support of the blue economy, in: International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engi- neering,volume86922,AmericanSocietyofMechanicalEngineers, 2023, p. V010T13A008

    2023

  94. [100]

    Natarajan, K

    P. Natarajan, K. Basha, A. Nambiar, Synth-sonar: Sonar image synthesis with enhanced diversity and realism via dual diffusion modelsandgptprompting,arXivpreprintarXiv:2410.08612(2024)

    2024 arXiv

  95. [101]

    Bayat, N

    B. Bayat, N. Crasta, A. Crespi, A. M. Pascoal, A. Ijspeert, Environ- mental monitoring using autonomous vehicles: a survey of recent searching techniques, Current opinion in biotechnology 45 (2017) 76–84

    2017

  96. [102]

    S. Yang, O. Nachum, Y. Du, J. Wei, P. Abbeel, D. Schuurmans, Foundation models for decision making: Problems, methods, and opportunities, arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.04129 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  97. [103]

    Heshmat, L

    M. Heshmat, L. Saad Saoud, M. Abujabal, A. Sultan, M. Elmezain, L. Seneviratne, I. Hussain, Underwater slam meets deep learning: Challenges, multi-sensor integration, and future directions, Sensors 25 (2025) 3258. W. Akram et al.:Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 22 of 26 A ...

    2025

  98. [104]

    Accessed: 2025-06-25

    H2O Robotics, H2omni-x: Autonomous surface vehicle,https:// h2o-robotics.com/h2omni-x/, 2021. Accessed: 2025-06-25

    2021

  99. [105]

    F. F. R. Merveille, B. Jia, Z. Xu, B. Fred, Advancements in sensor fusion for underwater slam: A review on enhanced navigation and environmental perception, Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 24 (2024) 7490

    2024

  100. [106]

    Chakravarty, P

    P. Chakravarty, P. Narayanan, T. Roussel, Gen-slam: Generative modelingformonocularsimultaneouslocalizationandmapping, in: 2019 International conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), IEEE, 2019, pp. 147–153

    2019

  101. [107]

    Safron, O

    A. Safron, O. Çatal, T. Verbelen, Generalized simultaneous local- ization and mapping (g-slam) as unification framework for natural and artificial intelligences: towards reverse engineering the hip- pocampal/entorhinal system and principles of high-level cognition, Frontiers i...

    2022

  102. [108]

    G. Böer, J. P. Gröger, S. Badri-Höher, B. Cisewski, H. Renkewitz, F.Mittermayer,T.Strickmann,H.Schramm, Adeep-learningbased pipeline for estimating the abundance and size of aquatic organisms in an unconstrained underwater environment from continuously captured stereo video, S...

    2023

  103. [109]

    Rahimi, A

    F. Rahimi, A. Sadeghi-Niaraki, S.-M. Choi, Generative ai meets virtualreality:Acomprehensivesurveyonapplications,challenges, and future direction, IEEE Access (2025)

    2025

  104. [110]

    Andreoni, W

    M. Andreoni, W. T. Lunardi, G. Lawton, S. Thakkar, Enhancing autonomous system security and resilience with generative ai: A comprehensive survey, IEEE Access (2024)

    2024

  105. [111]

    Swinton, J.-H

    S. Swinton, J.-H. Ewers, E. McGookin, D. Anderson, D. Thomson, Autonomous mission planning for planetary surface exploration usingateamofmicrorovers, FrontiersinRoboticsandAI12(2025) 1565173

    2025

  106. [112]

    B. Liu, G. Cai, Z. Ling, J. Qian, Q. Zhang, Precise positioning and prediction system for autonomous driving based on generative artificial intelligence, Applied and Computational Engineering 64 (2024) 42–49

    2024

  107. [113]

    Siderska, S

    J. Siderska, S. N. B. M. Aini, D. Kedziora, Complementing robotic process automation with generative artificial intelligence (chatgpt), case of robocorp, in: Future of Information and Communication Conference, Springer, 2024, pp. 37–53

    2024

  108. [114]

    R. Yang, M. Hou, J. Wang, F. Zhang, Oceanchat: Piloting au- tonomous underwater vehicles in natural language, arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.16052 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  109. [115]

    Isreal, L

    A. Isreal, L. Ismail, S. Oladele, F. Lambao, The rise of autonomous robots: Ai-driven navigation and control (2025)

    2025

  110. [116]

    V.Berman,A.Bazhenov,S.Satsevich,D.Tsetserukou, Missiongpt: Mission planner for mobile robot based on robotics transformer model, in: 2024 2nd International Conference on Foundation and Large Language Models (FLLM), IEEE, 2024, pp. 201–206

    2024

  111. [117]

    Serpiva, A

    V. Serpiva, A. Lykov, A. Myshlyaev, M. H. Khan, A. A. Ab- dulkarim, O. Sautenkov, D. Tsetserukou, Racevla: Vla-based rac- ing drone navigation with human-like behaviour, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.02572 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  112. [118]

    S. K. Nagothu, P. Bindu Sri, G. Anitha, S. Vincent, O. P. Kumar, Advancingaquaculture:Fuzzylogic-basedwaterqualitymonitoring and maintenance system for precision aquaculture, Aquaculture International 33 (2025) 32

    2025

  113. [119]

    Mikołajewska, D

    E. Mikołajewska, D. Mikołajewski, T. Mikołajczyk, T. Paczkowski, Generative ai in ai-based digital twins for fault diagnosis for predic- tive maintenance in industry 4.0/5.0, Applied Sciences 15 (2025) 3166

    2025

  114. [120]

    Firoozi, J

    R. Firoozi, J. Tucker, S. Tian, A. Majumdar, J. Sun, W. Liu, Y. Zhu, S. Song, A. Kapoor, K. Hausman, et al., Foundation models in robotics:Applications,challenges,andthefuture, TheInternational Journal of Robotics Research 44 (2025) 701–739

    2025

  115. [121]

    V. Mugala, Leveraging generative ai for enhanced predictive main- tenance and anomaly detection in manufacturing, in: Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Approaches for Industrial Applications, Springer, 2025, pp. 261–279

    2025

  116. [122]

    Mahale, S

    Y. Mahale, S. Kolhar, A. S. More, A comprehensive review on artificial intelligence driven predictive maintenance in vehicles: technologies, challenges and future research directions, Discover Applied Sciences 7 (2025) 243

    2025

  117. [123]

    Huang, S

    Y.-P. Huang, S. P. Khabusi, Artificial intelligence of things (aiot) advances in aquaculture: A review, Processes 13 (2025) 73

    2025

  118. [124]

    Y.Hu,A.N.NA,D.D.Yellamati,Y.Goktas, Leveraginggenerative ai tools for proactive risk mitigation in design, in: 2025 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS), IEEE, 2025, pp. 1–6

    2025

  119. [125]

    thesis, University of Maryland, College Park, 2024

    X.Lin,TowardsEfficientOceanicRobotLearningWithSimulation, Ph.D. thesis, University of Maryland, College Park, 2024

    2024

  120. [126]

    Menges, A

    D. Menges, A. Rasheed, Digital twin for autonomous surface vessels: Enabler for safe maritime navigation, arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.03465 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  121. [127]

    Z. A. Ali, M. Zain, R. Hasan, M. S. Pathan, H. AlSalman, F. A. Almisned, Digital twins: cornerstone to circular economy and sustainability goals, Environment, Development and Sustainability (2025) 1–42

    2025

  122. [128]

    S. M. Kargar, B. Yordanov, C. Harvey, A. Asadipour, Emerging trends in realistic robotic simulations: A comprehensive systematic literature review, IEEE Access (2024)

    2024

  123. [129]

    S.Ali,P.Arcaini,A.Arrieta,Foundationmodelsforthedigitaltwins creationofcyber-physicalsystems, in:InternationalSymposiumon LeveragingApplicationsofFormalMethods,Springer,2024,pp.9– 26

    2024

  124. [130]

    M. Raza, H. Prokopova, S. Huseynzade, S. Azimi, S. Lafond, To- wards integrated digital-twins: An application framework for au- tonomous maritime surface vessel development, Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 10 (2022) 1469

    2022

  125. [131]

    Hasan, T

    A. Hasan, T. Asfihani, O. Osen, R. T. Bye, Leveraging digital twins for fault diagnosis in autonomous ships, Ocean Engineering 292 (2024) 116546

    2024

  126. [132]

    Y. Shen, H. Ding, L. Seenivasan, T. Shu, M. Unberath, Position: Foundationmodelsneeddigitaltwinrepresentations, arXivpreprint arXiv:2505.03798 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  127. [133]

    Ciuccoli, L

    N. Ciuccoli, L. Screpanti, D. Scaradozzi, Underwater simulators analysis for digital twinning, IEEE Access (2024)

    2024

  128. [134]

    Aubard, A

    M. Aubard, A. Madureira, L. Teixeira, J. Pinto, Sonar-based deep learning in underwater robotics: Overview, robustness, and chal- lenges, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering (2025)

    2025

  129. [135]

    Q. Tang, J. Liang, F. Zhu, A comparative review on multi-modal sensorsfusionbasedondeeplearning, SignalProcessing213(2023) 109165

    2023

  130. [136]

    N. S. Madusanka, Y. Fan, S. Yang, X. Xiang, Digital twin in the maritimedomain:Areviewandemergingtrends, JournalofMarine Science and Engineering 11 (2023) 1021

    2023

  131. [137]

    L. Fan, Y. Wang, H. Zhang, C. Zeng, Y. Li, C. Gou, H. Yu, Multimodal perception and decision-making systems for complex roads based on foundation models, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems (2024)

    2024

  132. [138]

    M. A. Lee, B. Yi, R. Martín-Martín, S. Savarese, J. Bohg, Multi- modal sensor fusion with differentiable filters, in: 2020 IEEE/RSJ InternationalConferenceonIntelligentRobotsandSystems(IROS), IEEE, 2020, pp. 10444–10451

    2020

  133. [139]

    Huang, H

    Z. Huang, H. Yan, Q. Zhan, S. Yang, M. Zhang, C. Zhang, Y. Lei, Z. Liu, Q. Liu, Y. Wang, A survey on remote sensing foun- dation models: From vision to multimodality, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.22081 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  134. [140]

    A. R. Gepperth, T. Hecht, M. Gogate, A generative learning approach to sensor fusion and change detection, Cognitive Com- putation 8 (2016) 806–817

    2016

  135. [141]

    X.He,Y.Chen,L.Huang,D.Hong,Q.Du,Foundationmodel-based multimodal remote sensing data classification, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 62 (2023) 1–17

    2023

  136. [142]

    X. Han, S. Chen, Z. Fu, Z. Feng, L. Fan, D. An, C. Wang, L. Guo, W. Meng, X. Zhang, et al., Multimodal fusion and vision-language models:Asurveyforrobotvision, arXivpreprintarXiv:2504.02477 W. Akram et al.:Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 23 of 26 A Review of Generative AI ...

    2025

  137. [143]

    C. H. Song, J. Wu, C. Washington, B. M. Sadler, W.-L. Chao, Y. Su, Llm-planner: Few-shot grounded planning for embodied agentswithlargelanguagemodels,in:ProceedingsoftheIEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 2023, pp. 2998–3009

    2023

  138. [144]

    H. Wang, K. Köser, P. Ren, Large foundation model empowered discriminative underwater image enhancement, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing (2025)

    2025

  139. [145]

    L. Xu, S. Almahri, S. Mak, A. Brintrup, Multi-agent systems and foundationmodelsenableautonomoussupplychains:Opportunities and challenges, IFAC-PapersOnLine 58 (2024) 795–800

    2024

  140. [146]

    Z. Xiao, X. Fu, L. Zhang, W. Zhang, M. Agarwal, R. S. M. Goh, Marinemas: A multi-agent framework to aid design, modelling, and evaluationofautonomousshippingsystems, JournalofInternational MaritimeSafety,EnvironmentalAffairs,andShipping2(2019)43– 57

    2019

  141. [147]

    S. Wang, N. Niu, Z. Wang, Y. Lv, J. Zhang, Heterogeneous multi- agent task planning method in complex marine environment, IEEE Access (2025)

    2025

  142. [148]

    D.Wu,X.Wei,G.Chen,H.Shen,X.Wang,W.Li,B.Jin,Generative multi-agent collaboration in embodied ai: A systematic review, arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.11518 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  143. [149]

    R.Domínguez-May,J.M.Hernández,I.Velázquez-Abunader, Are- viewofdynamicoptimizationinaquacultureproductioneconomics, Reviews in Aquaculture 16 (2024) 1696–1717

    2024

  144. [150]

    J. Colt, J. E. Huguenin, Design and operating guide for aquaculture seawater systems, volume 33, Elsevier, 2002

    2002

  145. [151]

    B.F.Terjesen,S.T.Summerfelt,S.Nerland,Y.Ulgenes,S.O.Fjæra, B.K.M.Reiten,R.Selset,J.Kolarevic,P.Brunsvik,G.Bæverfjord, et al., Design, dimensioning, and performance of a research facility for studies on the requirements of fish in ras environments, Aqua- cultural engineering 54...

    2013

  146. [152]

    J. You, Z. Jia, C. Dong, Q. Wu, Z. Han, Generative ai-enhanced cooperative mec of uavs and ground stations for unmanned surface vehicles, arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.08119 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  147. [153]

    Katsidoniotaki, B

    E. Katsidoniotaki, B. Su, E. Kelasidi, T. P. Sapsis, Multifidelity digital twin for real-time monitoring of structural dynamics in aquaculture net cages, arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.04519 (2024). Submitted June 6, 2024; Revised June 10, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  148. [154]

    Z.Li,H.Ning, Autonomousgis:thenext-generationai-poweredgis, International Journal of Digital Earth 16 (2023) 4668–4686

    2023

  149. [155]

    T.T.E.Vo,H.Ko,J.-H.Huh,Y.Kim,Overviewofsmartaquaculture system:Focusingonapplicationsofmachinelearningandcomputer vision, Electronics 10 (2021) 2882

    2021

  150. [156]

    A.G.LaRosa,P.Simpson,R.Zammit, Exploringtheopportunities of generative artificial intelligence in concept ship design, in: International Marine Design Conference, 2024

    2024

  151. [157]

    D. A. Davis, Feed and feeding practices in aquaculture, Woodhead Publishing, 2022

    2022

  152. [158]

    A. Saad, A. Baikas, M. Remen, F. O. Bjørnson, Optimizing feeding strategies in aquaculture using machine learning: Ensuring sustainableandeconomicallyviablefishfarmingpractices, Procedia Computer Science 246 (2024) 4712–4721

    2024

  153. [159]

    Y.Wu,H.Xu,X.Wu,H.Wang,Z.Zhai, Identificationoffishhunger degree with deformable attention transformer, Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 12 (2024) 726

    2024

  154. [160]

    M. Luna, I. Llorente, A. Cobo, Determination of feeding strategies in aquaculture farms using a multiple-criteria approach and genetic algorithms, Annals of Operations Research 314 (2022) 551–576

    2022

  155. [161]

    Tynchenko, O

    V. Tynchenko, O. Kukartseva, Y. Tynchenko, V. Kukartsev, T. Pan- filova, K. Kravtsov, X. Wu, I. Malashin, Predicting tilapia pro- ductivity in geothermal ponds: A genetic algorithm approach for sustainable aquaculture practices, Sustainability 16 (2024) 9276

    2024

  156. [162]

    M. A. Rather, I. Ahmad, A. Shah, Y. A. Hajam, A. Amin, S. Khur- sheed, I. Ahmad, S. Rasool, Exploring opportunities of artificial intelligence in aquaculture to meet increasing food demand, Food Chemistry: X (2024) 101309

    2024

  157. [163]

    I.-H.Chen,Digitizingfishfeedingbehaviour:Asteptowardsfeeding automation in aquaculture (2025)

    2025

  158. [164]

    Metin, A

    A. Metin, A. Kasif, C. Catal, Temporal fusion transformer-based predictioninaquaponics, TheJournalofSupercomputing79(2023) 19934–19958

    2023

  159. [165]

    Spillias, E

    S. Spillias, E. A. Fulton, F. Boschetti, C. Bulman, J. Strzelecki, R. Trebilco, Automated diet matrix construction for marine ecosys- tem models using generative ai, bioRxiv (2025) 2025–05

    2025

  160. [166]

    N.Killoran,L.J.Lee,A.Delong,D.Duvenaud,B.J.Frey, Generat- ing and designing dna with deep generative models, arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.06148 (2017)

    2017 arXiv

  161. [167]

    C.Wu,Y.Zhang,Z.Ying,L.Li,J.Wang,H.Yu,M.Zhang,X.Feng, X. Wei, X. Xu, A transformer-based genomic prediction method fused with knowledge-guided module, Briefings in Bioinformatics 25 (2024) bbad438

    2024

  162. [168]

    M. Cui, X. Liu, H. Liu, Z. Du, T. Chen, G. Lian, D. Li, W. Wang, Multimodal fish feeding intensity assessment in aquaculture, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering (2024)

    2024

  163. [169]

    Z.Luo,Y.Yu,Z.Bao,F.Li, Evaluationofmachinelearningmethod in genomic selection for growth traits of pacific white shrimp, Aquaculture 581 (2024) 740376

    2024

  164. [170]

    R. L. Vallejo, T. D. Leeds, G. Gao, J. E. Parsons, K. E. Martin, J. P. Evenhuis, B. O. Fragomeni, G. D. Wiens, Y. Palti, Genomic selection models double the accuracy of predicted breeding values for bacterial cold water disease resistance compared to a traditional pedigree-bas...

    2017

  165. [171]

    Jubair, J

    S. Jubair, J. R. Tucker, N. Henderson, C. W. Hiebert, A. Badea, M. Domaratzki, W. D. Fernando, Gptransformer: a transformer- based deep learning method for predicting fusarium related traits in barley, Frontiers in plant science 12 (2021) 761402

    2021

  166. [172]

    R. Chen, W. Han, H. Zhang, H. Su, Z. Wang, X. Liu, H. Jiang, W. Ouyang, N. Dong, An embarrassingly simple approach to enhance transformer performance in genomic selection for crop breeding, arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.09585 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  167. [173]

    P. K. Pandey, A. Pande, Aquatic Environment Management, CRC Press, 2023

    2023

  168. [174]

    Y. Wang, J. Li, X. Zhang, Y. Yao, Y. Peng, Recent development in intelligentcompactionforasphaltpavementconstruction:leveraging smart sensors and machine learning, Sensors 24 (2024) 2777

    2024

  169. [175]

    Sastry, A

    A.Radford,J.W.Kim,C.Hallacy,A.Ramesh,G.Goh,S.Agarwal, G. Sastry, A. Askell, P. Mishkin, J. Clark, G. Krueger, I. Sutskever, Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervi- sion, Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning 139 (2021) ...

    2021

  170. [176]

    Suravajhala, L

    P. Suravajhala, L. J. Kogelman, H. N. Kadarmideen, Multi-omic data integration and analysis using systems genomics approaches: methods and applications in animal production, health and welfare, Genetics Selection Evolution 48 (2016) 1–14

    2016

  171. [177]

    Ozair, A

    I.Goodfellow,J.Pouget-Abadie,M.Mirza,B.Xu,D.Warde-Farley, S. Ozair, A. Courville, Y. Bengio, Generative adversarial nets, in: Advancesinneuralinformationprocessingsystems,2014,pp.2672– 2680

    2014

  172. [178]

    J. Ho, A. Jain, P. Abbeel, Denoising diffusion probabilistic models, arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.11239 (2020)

    2020 arXiv

  173. [179]

    J. Li, D. Li, C. Xiong, S. C. Hoi, Blip-2: Bootstrapping language- image pre-training with frozen image encoders and large language models, arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.12597 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  174. [180]

    B. J. Mary, Leveraging generative models for aquatic ecosystems. (????)

  175. [181]

    Khiari, Enzymes from fishery and aquaculture waste: Research trends in the era of artificial intelligence and circular bio-economy, Marine Drugs 22 (2024) 411

    Z. Khiari, Enzymes from fishery and aquaculture waste: Research trends in the era of artificial intelligence and circular bio-economy, Marine Drugs 22 (2024) 411

    2024

  176. [182]

    A.N.Schamne,A.Nagalli,A.A.V.Soeiro,J.P.d.S.P.Martins,Bim inconstructionwastemanagement:Aconceptualmodelbasedonthe industry foundation classes standard, Automation in Construction 159 (2024) 105283

    2024

  177. [183]

    A. J. Morrissey, J. Browne, Waste management models and their application to sustainable waste management, Waste management W. Akram et al.:Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 24 of 26 A Review of Generative AI in Smart Aquaculture 24 (2004) 297–308

    2004

  178. [184]

    Available at:https:// openai.com/research/gpt-4v-system-card

    OpenAI, Gpt-4 with vision (gpt-4v), 2024. Available at:https:// openai.com/research/gpt-4v-system-card

    2024

  179. [185]

    P. Ma, S. Tsai, Y. He, X. Jia, D. Zhen, N. Yu, Q. Wang, J. K. Ahuja, C.-I. Wei, Large language models in food science: Innovations, applications, and future, Trends in Food Science & Technology (2024) 104488

    2024

  180. [186]

    B.Lim,S.Ö.Arık,N.Loeff,T.Pfister,Temporalfusiontransformers forinterpretablemulti-horizontimeseriesforecasting, International Journal of Forecasting 37 (2021) 1748–1764

    2021

  181. [187]

    H. Lin, J. Lin, F. Wang, An innovative machine learning model for supply chain management, Journal of Innovation & Knowledge 7 (2022) 100276

    2022

  182. [188]

    V.Suresh,Goodaquaculturepracticesandsmartaquaculture(2023)

    2023

  183. [189]

    Shehzad, U

    K. Shehzad, U. Ali, A. Munir, Computer vision for food quality assessment: Advances and challenges, Available at SSRN 5196776 (2025)

    2025

  184. [190]

    Romero-Tapiador, R

    S. Romero-Tapiador, R. Tolosana, B. Lacruz-Pleguezuelos, L. J. Marcos-Zambrano, G. X. Bazán, I. Espinosa-Salinas, J. Fierrez, J. Ortega-Garcia, E. C. de Santa Pau, A. Morales, Are vision- language models ready for dietary assessment? exploring the next frontier in ai-powered f...

    2025

  185. [191]

    Silverthorn, S

    M. Silverthorn, S. O. Yakubu, L. Falconer, Checklist and report- ing framework to support documentation and communication of gis-based multi-criteria evaluation (mce) models for aquaculture site selection, PLOS Sustainability and Transformation 4 (2025) e0000155

    2025

  186. [192]

    B. Li, K. Mellou, B. Zhang, J. Pathuri, I. Menache, Large language models for supply chain optimization, arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.03875 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  187. [193]

    S.Ramanan,M.Sujan,S.Kumari,O.G.Swathika, Ai-basedvirtual advisorforsmartclimatefarming, ResilientCommunityMicrogrids (2025) 1–30

    2025

  188. [194]

    A.T.Landge,A.Mano,Akansha,K.Nikhil,S.AbuthagirIburahim, Iot and ai applications in fishing: Smart fishing for sustainable practices, in:InformationTechnologyinFisheriesandAquaculture, Springer, 2025, pp. 59–70

    2025

  189. [195]

    URL: https: //docs.auroryai.com/aurory-ai/aurory-ai-agents/ag-aquagpt , accessed: 2025-04-23

    Aurory AI, AG / AquaGPT - Aurory AI, 2024. URL: https: //docs.auroryai.com/aurory-ai/aurory-ai-agents/ag-aquagpt , accessed: 2025-04-23

    2024

  190. [196]

    T.M.Garlock,F.Asche,J.L.Anderson,H.Eggert,T.M.Anderson, B. Che, C. A. Chávez, J. Chu, N. Chukwuone, M. M. Dey, et al., Environmental, economic, and social sustainability in aquaculture: theaquacultureperformanceindicators, NatureCommunications15 (2024) 5274

    2024

  191. [197]

    C. S. Alexander, M. Yarborough, A. Smith, Who is responsible for ‘responsible ai’?: Navigating challenges to build trust in ai agriculture and food system technology, Precision Agriculture 25 (2024) 146–185

    2024

  192. [198]

    F. Ma, Z. Fan, A. Nikolaeva, H. Bao, Redefining aquaculture safety with artificial intelligence: Design innovations, trends, and future perspectives, Fishes 10 (2025) 88

    2025

  193. [199]

    U. M. of Climate Change, Environment, Uae national framework forsustainablefisheries,2023.URL: https://www.moccae.gov.ae/en/ home.aspx, accessed: 2023-04-23

    2023

  194. [200]

    J. C. Kush, Integrating sensor technologies with conversational ai: Enhancing context-sensitive interaction through real-time data fusion, Sensors 25 (2025) 249

    2025

  195. [201]

    A.Iles, Makingtheseafoodindustrymoresustainable:creatingpro- duction chain transparency and accountability, Journal of Cleaner Production 15 (2007) 577–589

    2007

  196. [202]

    M. E. Lam, The ethics and sustainability of capture fisheries and aquaculture, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 29 (2016) 35–65

    2016

  197. [203]

    N. Rane, S. Choudhary, J. Rane, Blockchain and artificial intelli- gence (ai) integration for revolutionizing security and transparency in finance, Available at SSRN 4644253 (2023)

    2023

  198. [204]

    Commission, Common fisheries policy (cfp), 2023

    E. Commission, Common fisheries policy (cfp), 2023. URL: https://oceans-and-fisheries.ec.europa.eu/policy/ common-fisheries-policy-cfp_en, accessed: 2023-04-23

    2023

  199. [205]

    O.S.Rørvik,BlockchainTechnologyappliedinAquacultureSupply Chains, Master’s thesis, NTNU, 2022

    2022

  200. [206]

    Tolentino-Zondervan, P

    F. Tolentino-Zondervan, P. T. A. Ngoc, J. L. Roskam, Use cases andfutureprospectsofblockchainapplicationsinglobalfisheryand aquaculture value chains, Aquaculture 565 (2023) 739158

    2023

  201. [207]

    J. M. Rožanec, P. Zajec, E. Trajkova, B. Šircelj, B. Brecelj, I. No- valija, P. Dam, B. Fortuna, D. Mladenić, Towards a comprehensive visual quality inspection for industry 4.0, IFAC-PapersOnLine 55 (2022) 690–695

    2022

  202. [208]

    I. M. Leghemo, C. Azubuike, O. D. Segun-Falade, C. S. Odionu, Data governance for emerging technologies: A conceptual frame- work for managing blockchain, iot, and ai, Journal of Engineering Research and Reports 27 (2025) 247–267

    2025

  203. [210]

    A.Shamsuzzoha,J.Marttila,P.Helo, Blockchain-enabledtraceabil- itysystemforthesustainableseafoodindustry, TechnologyAnalysis & Strategic Management 36 (2024) 3891–3905

    2024

  204. [212]

    T. A. Vijay, M. Raju, Blockchain applications in fisheries, in: E3S Web of Conferences, volume 399, EDP Sciences, 2023, p. 07008

    2023

  205. [213]

    S. B. Dhal, D. Kar, Leveraging artificial intelligence and advanced food processing techniques for enhanced food safety, quality, and security: a comprehensive review, Discover Applied Sciences 7 (2025) 1–46

    2025

  206. [214]

    Gleadall, A

    I. Gleadall, A. Barkai, Z. Lajbner, P. McIntyre, H. Moustahfid, P.Olsen,R.Oyanedel,Y.Pang,G.J.Pierce,L.Quesada,etal., Sus- tainable seafood: advances in traceability, assessment, monitoring and resource management, African Journal of Marine Science 46 (2024) 239–245

    2024

  207. [215]

    K.O.Obiero,H.Waidbacher,S.Drexler,G.Winkler,J.O.Manyala, J. M. Njiru, B. Kaunda-Arara, Knowledge management and invest- ing in human capacity development for aquacultural education and training in africa, Bull. Anim. Hlth. Prod. Afr (2016) 167–183

    2016

  208. [216]

    Insights, National fisheries institute joins ibm’s food trust for blockchain traceability, Ledger Insights, 2019

    L. Insights, National fisheries institute joins ibm’s food trust for blockchain traceability, Ledger Insights, 2019. URL:https://www. ledgerinsights.com/, first multi-company seafood blockchain pilot funded by SIRF and led by NFI

    2019

  209. [217]

    S. I. Fernandes Borges Pena Seixas, J. Bostock, M. Eleftheriou, Promoting sustainable aquaculture: Building the capacity of local institutions and online teaching (elearning), Management of Envi- ronmental Quality: An International Journal 23 (2012) 434–450

    2012

  210. [218]

    C. E. Boyd, L. R. D’Abramo, B. D. Glencross, D. C. Huyben, L. M. Juarez,G.S.Lockwood,A.A.McNevin,A.G.Tacon,F.Teletchea, J.R.TomassoJr,etal.,Achievingsustainableaquaculture:Historical andcurrentperspectivesandfutureneedsandchallenges, Journalof the world aquaculture society 51 ...

    2020

  211. [219]

    J. Rane, Ö. Kaya, S. K. Mallick, N. L. Rane, Generative Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture, Education, and Business, Deep Science Publishing, 2024

    2024

  212. [220]

    Brugere, T

    C. Brugere, T. Bansal, F. Kruijssen, M. Williams, Humanizing aquaculture development: Putting social and human concerns at the center of future aquaculture development, Journal of the World Aquaculture Society 54 (2023) 482–526

    2023

  213. [221]

    Haese, Q

    A. Haese, Q. Rouhani, N. Mabasa, B. Trollope, C. van Zyl, P. Chisenga, Addressing accessibility of online platforms for low- literacy users in small-scale aquaculture (2024)

    2024

  214. [222]

    K.Zander,A.Risius,Y.Feucht,M.Janssen,U.Hamm, Sustainable aquaculture products: implications of consumer awareness and of consumer preferences for promising market communication in ger- many, Journal of aquatic food product technology 27 (2018) 5–20

    2018

  215. [223]

    C. A. Olawunmi, A. P. Clarke, Analysing the marketing strategies that fish farming businesses in the uk can use to gain a competitive advantage, JournalofEnterprisingCommunities:PeopleandPlaces in the Global Economy 17 (2023) 1410–1438

    2023

  216. [224]

    Khademi-Vidra, B

    A. Khademi-Vidra, B. Urbányi, I. M. Bakos, Educational and training innovation opportunities in the aquaculture and fisheries sector of hungarian secondary agricultural education, Aquaculture International 32 (2024) 5437–5459. W. Akram et al.:Preprint submitted to Elsevier Pag...

    2024

  217. [225]

    Lucas, L.-G

    S. Lucas, L.-G. Soler, C. Revoredo-Giha, Trend analysis of sustain- abilityclaims:Theeuropeanfisheriesandaquaculturemarketscase, Food Policy 104 (2021) 102141

    2021

  218. [226]

    Fernandes, A

    S. Fernandes, A. DMello, Artificial intelligence in the aquaculture industry: Current state, challenges and future directions, Aquacul- ture (2024) 742048

    2024

  219. [227]

    J.Gladju,B.S.Kamalam,A.Kanagaraj,Applicationsofdatamining and machine learning framework in aquaculture and fisheries: A review, Smart Agricultural Technology 2 (2022) 100061

    2022

  220. [228]

    Çelik, B

    P. Çelik, B. Akmermer, Target market selection for the major aquaculture products of turkey-an evaluation on export markets by hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach, Aquaculture Studies 22 (2021)

    2021

  221. [229]

    Mitra, Fishsurv: An ai-driven api for predicting fish mortality in aquaculture using neural network survival analysis, Available at SSRN 4768075 (2024)

    J. Mitra, Fishsurv: An ai-driven api for predicting fish mortality in aquaculture using neural network survival analysis, Available at SSRN 4768075 (2024)

    2024

  222. [230]

    R. Yang, F. Zhang, M. Hou, Oceanplan: Hierarchical planning and replanning for natural language auv piloting in large-scale unexplored ocean environments, arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.15369 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  223. [231]

    D. J. Samuel, Y. Sermet, D. Cwiertny, I. Demir, Integrating vision- based ai and large language models for real-time water pollution surveillance, Water Environment Research 96 (2024) e11092

    2024

  224. [232]

    P. Li, H. Han, S. Zhang, H. Fang, W. Fan, F. Zhao, C. Xu, Reviews on the development of digital intelligent fisheries technology in aquaculture, Aquaculture International 33 (2025) 191

    2025

  225. [233]

    J. Wen, Z. Li, M. Xi, J. He, A llm-assisted auv 3d path planning schemeunderoceancurrentinterferenceviareinforcementlearning, IEEE Internet of Things Journal (2025)

    2025

  226. [234]

    Z. Peng, E. Liu, C. Pan, L. Liu, Model-based deep reinforce- ment learning for data-driven motion control of an under-actuated unmanned surface vehicle: Path following and trajectory tracking, Journal of the Franklin Institute (2023)

    2023

  227. [235]

    Lin, O.-W

    M.-Y. Lin, O.-W. Lee, C.-Y. Lu, Embodied ai with large language models: A survey and new hri framework, in: 2024 9th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Robotics and Mechatronics (ICARM), 2024

    2024

  228. [236]

    Sundaravadivel, P

    P. Sundaravadivel, P. Roselyn, V. Narayanaswamy, A. Khanal, Inte- grating image-based llms on edge-devices for underwater robotics, in: Proceedings of SPIE, 2024

    2024

  229. [237]

    Karim, D

    H. Karim, D. Gupta, S. Sitharaman, Securing llm workloads with nist ai rmf in the internet of robotic things, IEEE Access (2025)

    2025

  230. [238]

    Z.Bi,N.Zhang,Y.Xue,Y.Ou,D.Ji,G.Zheng,H.Chen, Oceangpt: A large language model for ocean science tasks, arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.02031 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  231. [239]

    S. Lian, H. Li, Evaluation of segment anything model 2: The role of sam2 in the underwater environment, arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.02924 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  232. [240]

    W.Zhang,X.Kong,C.Dewitt,J.Hong, Astudyonpromptinjection attackagainstllm-integratedmobileroboticsystems, in:2024IEEE 35th International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW), 2024

    2024

  233. [241]

    N.Khanal,C.M.Yu,J.-C.Chiu,A.Chaudhary,Z.Zhang,K.Katija, A. G. Forbes, Fathomgpt: A natural language interface for in- teractively exploring ocean science data, in: Proceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, 2024, pp. 1–15

    2024

  234. [242]

    Koskinopoulou, Y

    M.Grimaldi,P.Cieslak,E.Ochoa,V.Bharti,H.Rajani,I.Carlucho, M. Koskinopoulou, Y. R. Petillot, N. Gracias, Stonefish: Support- ing machine learning research in marine robotics, arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.11887 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  235. [243]

    Nikushchenko, A

    D. Nikushchenko, A. Maevskiy, I. Kozhemyakin, E. Nikitina, De- velopment of a cascade intelligent system for path planning of the group of marine robotic complexes, Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 11 (2023)

    2023

  236. [244]

    R.Chen,D.Blow,A.Abdullah,M.J.Islam, Word2wave:Language driven mission programming for efficient subsea deployments of marine robots, arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.18405 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  237. [245]

    X. Xi, H. Yang, S. Zhang, Y. Liu, S. Sun, X. Fu, Lightweight multimodal artificial intelligence framework for maritime multi- scene recognition, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.06978 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  238. [246]

    J.Coffelt,P.Kampmann,M.Beetz, Implementationandapplication ofaknowledgeserviceforauvmissionexplainability, in:2025IEEE Underwater Technology (UT), 2025

    2025

  239. [247]

    Marina, T

    T. Marina, T. Mampilly, S. Deepa, J. Jayapriya, Comprehensive largelanguagemodelforbathymetrydata, in:Proceedingsofthe4th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing and Intelligent Information Systems (ICUIS), 2024

    2024

  240. [248]

    Agyei, P

    K. Agyei, P. Sarhadi, W. Naeem, Large language model-based decision-making for colregs and the control of autonomous surface vehicles, arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.16587 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  241. [249]

    H.-S. Liu, S. Kuroki, T. Kozuno, C.-Y. Lee, Language-guided patternformationforswarmroboticswithmulti-agentreinforcement learning, in: IEEE IROS 2024, 2024

    2024

  242. [250]

    Anand, M

    A. Anand, M. Bharath, P. Sundaravadivel, R. Annie Uthra, On- device intelligence for ai-enabled bio-inspired autonomous under- water vehicles (auvs), IEEE Access (2024)

    2024

  243. [251]

    H.Luo,S.Jia,S.Chen,L.Ma, Embodiedintelligenceinunmanned surface vehicles: Current applications and future perspectives, in: Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engi- neering, 2024

    2024

  244. [252]

    S. Wang, F. Ma, X. Yan, Y. Liu, Adaptive and extendable control of unmanned surface vehicle formations using distributed deep reinforcement learning, Applied Ocean Research (2021)

    2021

  245. [253]

    Benjdira, A

    B. Benjdira, A. Koubaa, A. Ali, Prompting robotic modalities (prm):Astructuredarchitectureforcentralizinglanguagemodelsin complex systems, Future Generation Computer Systems (2025)

    2025

  246. [254]

    Gentili, M

    A. Gentili, M. Bresciani, F. Ruscio, R. Costanzi, Detection and classification of man-made objects for the autonomy of underwater robots, in: IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2023

    2023

  247. [255]

    Ortiz-Toro, C

    C. Ortiz-Toro, C. Cerrada-Collado, D. Moreno-Salinas, A. Gutiér- rez, Exploring uuv development with nausim: An open-source simulation platform, in: GCWOT 2024, 2024

    2024

  248. [256]

    Z. Qi, X. Jing, Advances in large language models for robotics, in: 2024 7th International Conference on Mechatronics, Robotics and Automation (ICMRA), 2024

    2024

  249. [260]

    Marxer, V

    R. Marxer, V. Hugel, K. Prud’Homme, I. Schjolberg, Marine and maritime intelligent robotics (mir), in: Oceans Conference Record (IEEE), 2021. W. Akram et al.:Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 26 of 26

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.