Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Nanodomain poling unlocking backward nonlinear light generation in thin film lithium niobate

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper reports scalable periodic poling of x-cut thin-film lithium niobate with periods down to 215 nm, demonstrating counter-propagating second-harmonic generation at 1474 %/W/cm² and the first backward-propagating spontaneous…

desk verdict A well-executed fabrication and nonlinear optics paper that likely delivers the first backward-propagating SPDC in TFLN, but the directionality claim would benefit from a direct time-reversal check. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.13004 v1 pith:4B36PLYE submitted 2025-07-17 physics.optics

Alessandra Sabatti , Jost Kellner , Robert J. Chapman , Rachel Grange This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics PACS 42.65.Ky42.79.Nv
keywords thin-filmlithiumniobateperiodicpolingnanodomaincounter-propagatingphasematchingbackwardsecondharmonicgenerationspontaneousparametricdown-conversionquasi-phaseintegratedquantumphotonics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Periodic poling of x-cut thin-film lithium niobate has been limited to micrometre-scale periods because adjacent domains merge when poled at sub-micron pitch. This paper claims to break that limit by placing poling electrodes on the etched sidewalls of the waveguide, achieving first-order gratings at 390 nm and 215 nm periods. In these devices the authors measure counter-propagating second-harmonic conversion at $1474\,\%/\mathrm{W}/\mathrm{cm}^2$ and backward conversion at $45\,\%/\mathrm{W}/\mathrm{cm}^2$, with sum-frequency phase-matching maps that match simulation, and they report the first backward-propagating spontaneous parametric down-conversion, with source brightness of 89 kHz/mW (counter) and 11 kHz/mW (backward). If correct, this turns propagation direction into an engineerable property of integrated nonlinear sources, enabling high-purity, spectrally separated photon pairs and potential mirrorless parametric oscillators on the standard x-cut platform.

What carries the argument

The central object is the sidewall-poled ferroelectric domain grating: a periodic inversion of the crystal's nonlinearity whose period encodes the propagation directions of the interacting waves. For degenerate signal and idler, counter-propagating phase matching needs $\Lambda = \lambda_p / n(\lambda_p)$ and backward-propagating phase matching needs $\Lambda = \lambda_p / [n(\lambda_p)+n(\lambda_s)]$, which in this platform dictates periods near 390 nm and 215 nm, respectively. The fabrication method, depositing titanium electrodes on the etched waveguide sidewalls and applying a single 1 ms voltage pulse, is what makes these gratings possible, by preventing the lateral domain merging that occurs when electrodes are placed on the top surface far apart, and by avoiding the shallow inversion that occurs when they are placed close together.

What would settle it

Image a cross-section of the 215 nm-period waveguide with a depth-resolved technique such as piezoresponse force microscopy to map the actual inverted-domain depth, then compute the backward second-harmonic and SPDC efficiencies from that true domain profile and compare with the measured values. If the measured backward signal matches a model in which the inverted region has no overlap with the guided mode, or if preventing any forward-generated light from returning (e.g., by placing an absorber at the far end of the waveguide) leaves the backward count unchanged, the intrinsic-backward-generation claim is disproven.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that ultrashort poling periods for counter- and backward-propagating quasi-phase matching can be achieved in x-cut thin-film lithium niobate by etching the waveguide before poling and patterning the high-voltage electrodes on the waveguide sidewalls. This 'sidewall poling' confines the lateral growth of the ferroelectric domains and starts nucleation along the full etched depth, yielding first-order gratings at 390 nm (full film inversion, roughly 50% duty cycle) and 215 nm (domains reaching about half the film thickness). On these gratings the authors demonstrate counter-propagating second-harmonic generation at $1474\,\%/\mathrm{W}/\mathrm{cm}^2$, backward second-harmonic generation at $45\,\%/\mathrm{W}/\mathrm{cm}^2$, sum-frequency maps whose line shapes match the predicted phase-matching functions, and the first backward-propagating spontaneous parametric down-conversion with an internal brightness of 11 kHz/mW. The paper treats the 215 nm device's partially inverted domains as a remaining limitation and suggests a second poling step could complete the inversion.

Load-bearing premise

The backward-propagating demonstration assumes that in the 215 nm-period device, the partially inverted domains that reach only about half the film thickness and are merged at the bottom still provide enough nonlinear overlap in the guided optical mode, and that the backward-detected light is genuinely generated backward by the grating rather than being forward-generated light that is reflected somewhere in the circuit.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Counter- and backward-propagating photon-pair sources become feasible on the x-cut TFLN platform, inheriting its high-speed electro-optic tunability and established fabrication ecosystem.
  • Backward-propagating SPDC gives deterministic spatial separation of signal and idler, plus natural pump filtering, which simplifies quantum routing and time-bin entanglement experiments.
  • The measured counter-propagating SHG efficiency of 1474 %/W/cm² at roughly half the theoretical value indicates that first-order 390 nm gratings in x-cut TFLN are already close to practical quality.
  • With periods near 215 nm available, the mirrorless degeneracy-locked optical parametric oscillator and backward-wave devices previously limited to bulk crystals can be considered for integrated implementation.
  • Because the method is based on standard electron-beam lithography and a single voltage pulse, it is scalable to millimetre-long poled regions, directly increasing photon-pair brightness with length.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Completing the inversion of the 215 nm domains with a second poling step after thinning the sidewall electrodes would likely raise the backward efficiency far above the current 45 %/W/cm².
  • The same sidewall-poling geometry should scale to even shorter periods, potentially below 200 nm, by narrowing the waveguide top width, opening other directional phase-matching configurations.
  • A direct check of the backward origin of the photon pairs, such as distinguishing backward-generated from reflected forward light via time-resolved detection after short-pulse pumping, would convert the indirect SFG-map evidence into a definitive demonstration.
  • Direction-engineered phase matching of this kind might be used to build nonlinear isolators or add-drop elements, since the sign of the phase-matching condition selects which propagation direction couples.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports periodic poling of x-cut thin-film lithium niobate with periods down to 215 nm using a sidewall-electrode technique, and uses these gratings to demonstrate counter-propagating and backward-propagating phase-matched nonlinear interactions. The authors characterize second-harmonic generation (efficiencies 1474 %/W/cm2 and ~45 %/W/cm2), map sum-frequency generation and compare with simulations, and measure spontaneous parametric down-conversion with on-chip brightness values of 89 kHz/mW and 11 kHz/mW, claiming the first backward-propagating SPDC in an integrated platform.

Significance. If the direction assignment is correct, this is an important step for nanodomain engineering and for integrated quantum sources with tailored photon propagation. The sidewall-poling method is a scalable approach to sub-300 nm periods in the technologically important x-cut TFLN platform. The paper provides clear fabrication details, SEM and wet-etch domain characterization, and nonlinear optical data with consistent power scalings and high CAR, which strengthens confidence in the core observations.

major comments (2)
  1. [Nonlinear spectrum and efficiency measurement] The claim that reflections are excluded is not quantitatively justified. The SFG map shape is compared to simulation for the intended backward process, but no calculation is shown for the phase-matching condition of forward-generated light followed by reflection. Since the backward device is the principal novelty, please add a quantitative estimate of the phase mismatch for forward SHG/SFG with the 215 nm grating (showing that it is far from phase matching), or provide a direction-resolving measurement such as a time-delay or reflectivity test. Without this, the reader cannot independently verify the direction assignment.
  2. [Fabrication and characterization, Fig. 2d/f] The 215 nm domains reach only about half of the film thickness and are merged at the bottom. The reported backward efficiencies (45 %/W/cm2 and 11 kHz/mW) are attributed to this imperfection, but no quantitative model of the nonlinear overlap integral for the actual domain shape is provided. Please include a calculation of the expected efficiency reduction from the measured domain depth and duty cycle, to confirm that the observed backward signals are consistent with the partially poled grating.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fabrication and characterization] In the paragraph following Fig. 2, the text refers to the 215 nm period sample as '(Fig.2e)', but the correct subfigure is Fig. 2f; please fix this citation.
  2. [Nonlinear spectrum and efficiency measurement] The reported conversion efficiencies and SPDC brightness values are given without error bars or confidence intervals; please report uncertainties from the fits, as these numbers are central to the quantitative claims.
  3. [Abstract / Introduction] The abstract states an efficiency of 45 %/W/cm2 for the backward device, while the introduction says 45 %/W/cm2 and the measurement section reports 44 %/W/cm2; please harmonize these values.
  4. [Introduction / throughout] The terms 'backward-propagating' and 'back-propagating' are used interchangeably; please define the terminology once and use it consistently.
  5. [Nonlinear spectrum and efficiency measurement] The statement that the theoretical conversion efficiency is the same for all three phase-matching schemes is nontrivial, since the nonlinear overlap integrals for forward, counter-propagating, and backward geometries may differ; please provide a derivation or reference.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the central claims are measured quantities validated against independent simulations, and the one self-citation is not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper is an experimental demonstration rather than a derivation, so the main circularity patterns (self-definitional prediction, fitted input called prediction, uniqueness imported from authors, ansatz smuggled in via citation) do not apply. Conversion efficiencies are obtained by quadratic fits to measured SHG power sweeps and then compared with a theoretical value (3020 %/W/cm2) computed from standard QPM and mode-overlap formulas; the fit does not define the comparison. The SFG maps are compared with independent simulations in the Supplementary and with the characteristic phase-matching shape of each configuration; this is a falsifiable external check, not a circular reduction. The SPDC brightness figures come from linear fits to coincidence rates. The only self-citation is ref [29], a companion arXiv paper on counter-propagating SPDC, used for the expected spectral-purity feature of counter-propagating phase matching; it is not needed for the novel backward-propagating claim and therefore is not load-bearing. The manuscript itself flags the main limitation at Fig. 2d/f: for the 215 nm period the domains "reach only about half of the film thickness" and "are merged at the bottom"; the authors explicitly attribute the reduced backward efficiency to this partial inversion. Whether reflected forward-generated light can mimic the backward SFG and SPDC signals is a legitimate experimental-validity risk, but it is a physical correctness concern, not a circularity: the paper's argument that reflections are excluded is based on measured map shape against simulation, and no fitted parameter or self-referential definition forces the conclusion. Overall, no load-bearing step reduces to its own inputs; score 2 reflects only the minor, non-load-bearing self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the validity of sidewall poling, the interpretation of SEM and wet-etch domain images, directional assignment of nonlinear signals, and standard QPM and material parameters. Measured efficiencies and brightnesses are reported as fitted values without uncertainty estimates, and raw data are not deposited.

free parameters (4)
  • Counter-propagating SHG conversion efficiency = 1474 %/W/cm2
    Fitted from the quadratic power sweep in Fig. 3c; reported without uncertainty.
  • Backward-propagating SHG conversion efficiency = 45 %/W/cm2
    Fitted from the quadratic power sweep in Fig. 3d; reported without uncertainty.
  • Counter-propagating SPDC brightness = 89 kHz/mW
    Linear fit to coincidence rate vs pump power in Fig. 4a.
  • Backward-propagating SPDC brightness = 11 kHz/mW
    Linear fit to coincidence rate vs pump power in Fig. 4b.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Quasi-phase-matching period formulas for counter- and backward-propagating interactions (Lambda = lambda_p/n(lambda_p), etc.)
    Used in Phase matching with ultrashort domains to set target periods of 390 nm and 215 nm; standard QPM theory.
  • domain assumption Sidewall poling nucleates domains along the entire etched depth and produces stable ferroelectric domains in x-cut TFLN
    Basis for the fabrication method, introduced in ref [32] and applied in Fabrication and characterization; no in-situ poling dynamics are measured.
  • domain assumption SEM and wet-etch topographic contrast reveal true domain geometry
    Used to claim 50% duty cycle and partial depth for 215 nm domains in Fig. 2; SEM probes only a few nanometers and wet etching is an indirect contrast method.
  • domain assumption Measured backward-propagating SHG, SFG, and SPDC originate from the poled grating rather than from reflections of forward-generated light
    The authors use the SFG map shape to exclude reflections; this relies on the simulation being correct and on directional assignment of signals.
  • domain assumption Bulk material parameters (refractive indices, d_eff, mode overlap) used for the theoretical efficiency of 3020 %/W/cm2 are accurate for the fabricated waveguide
    Comparison in Nonlinear spectrum and efficiency measurement assumes standard TFLN parameters; details of the calculation are not shown.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nanodomain poling unlocking backward nonlinear light generation in thin film lithium niobate." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4B36PLYE

@misc{pith2026250713004,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nanodomain poling unlocking backward nonlinear light generation in thin film lithium niobate},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4B36PLYE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.13004}
}
abstract

Nonlinear frequency conversion offers powerful capabilities for applications in telecommunications, signal processing, and computing. Thin-film lithium niobate (TFLN) has emerged as a promising integrated photonics platform due to its strong electro-optic effect and second-order nonlinearity, which can be exploited through periodic poling. However, conventional poling techniques in x-cut TFLN are limited to minimum period sizes on the order of microns, preventing the efficient generation of interactions involving counter-propagating waves. Here we report scalable periodic poling of x-cut TFLN with periods down to 215 nm and realize devices for counter- and back-propagating phase matching. We estimate conversion efficiencies of 1474 $\%$/W/cm$^2$ and 45 $\%$/W/cm$^2$ respectively, and measuring sum frequency generation we confirm that the nonlinear generation takes place in the desired direction. We report spontaneous parametric down conversion for the counter-propagating and, for the first time, for a backward propagating device. This technological advance provides the control of domain geometry in TFLN with an unprecedented precision and leads into the generation of photon pairs with spatial and spectral properties tailored for quantum signal processing, quantum computing and metrology.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.13004 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A high-performance quantum pulse gate in thin-film lithium niobate

    quant-ph 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A thin-film lithium niobate quantum pulse gate achieves 96.8% temporal-mode selectivity and a lower-bound normalized conversion efficiency of 1810 W^-1 cm^-2, about 1000 times higher than previous QPGs.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    C. Wang, M. Zhang, X. Chen, M. Bertrand, A. Shams- Ansari, S. Chandrasekhar, P. Winzer, and M. Lonˇ car, In- tegrated lithium niobate electro-optic modulators operat- ing at cmos-compatible voltages, Nature 562, 101 (2018)

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    Fortier and E

    T. Fortier and E. Baumann, 20 years of developments in optical frequency comb technology and applications, Communications Physics 2, 153 (2019)

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    Latour, L

    G. Latour, L. Robinet, A. Dazzi, F. Portier, A. Deniset- Besseau, and M.-C. Schanne-Klein, Correlative nonlinear optical microscopy and infrared nanoscopy reveals colla- gen degradation in altered parchments, Scientific Reports 6, 26344 (2016)

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    T. Wang, M. M. Sohoni, L. G. Wright, M. M. Stein, S.-Y. Ma, T. Onodera, M. G. Anderson, and P. L. McMahon, Image sensing with multilayer nonlinear optical neural networks, Nature Photonics 17, 408 (2023)

    2023

  5. [5]

    A. Y. Hwang, H. S. Stokowski, T. Park, M. Jankowski, T. P. McKenna, C. Langrock, J. Mishra, V. Ansari, M. M. Fejer, and A. H. Safavi-Naeini, Mid-infrared spec- troscopy with a broadly tunable thin-film lithium niobate optical parametric oscillator, Optica 10, 1535 (2023)

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    C. Wang, C. Langrock, A. Marandi, M. Jankowski, M. Zhang, B. Desiatov, M. M. Fejer, and M. Lonˇ car, Ultrahigh-efficiency wavelength conversion in nanopho- tonic periodically poled lithium niobate waveguides, Op- tica 5, 1438 (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    J. Zhao, C. Ma, M. R¨ using, and S. Mookherjea, High quality entangled photon pair generation in periodically 8 poled thin-film lithium niobate waveguides, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 163603 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Schneeloch, S

    J. Schneeloch, S. H. Knarr, D. F. Bogorin, M. L. Levangie, C. C. Tison, R. Frank, G. A. Howland, M. L. Fanto, and P. M. Alsing, Introduction to the absolute brightness and number statistics in spontaneous para- metric down-conversion, Journal of Optics 21, 043501 (2019)

    work page 2019

Show all 41 references
  1. [9]

    G. Chen, N. Li, J. D. Ng, H.-L. Lin, Y. Zhou, Y. H. Fu, L. Y. T. Lee, Y. Yu, A.-Q. Liu, and A. J. Danner, Ad- vances in lithium niobate photonics: development status and perspectives, Advanced Photonics 4, 034003 (2022)

    2022

  2. [10]

    D. Zhu, L. Shao, M. Yu, R. Cheng, B. Desiatov, C. J. Xin, Y. Hu, J. Holzgrafe, S. Ghosh, A. Shams- Ansari, E. Puma, N. Sinclair, C. Reimer, M. Zhang, and M. Lonˇ car, Integrated photonics on thin-film lithium nio- bate, Adv. Opt. Photon. 13, 242 (2021)

    2021

  3. [11]

    P.-K. Chen, I. Briggs, C. Cui, L. Zhang, M. Shah, and L. Fan, Adapted poling to break the nonlinear efficiency limit in nanophotonic lithium niobate waveguides, Na- ture Nanotechnology 19, 44 (2024)

    2024

  4. [12]

    C. Xin, S. Lu, J. Yang, A. Shams-Ansari, B. Desiatov, L. S. Magalh˜ aes, S. S. Ghosh, E. McGee, D. Renaud, N. Achuthan, et al., Wavelength-accurate and wafer- scale process for nonlinear frequency mixers in thin-film lithium niobate, Communications Physics 8, 136 (2025)

    2025

  5. [13]

    Kaufmann, G

    F. Kaufmann, G. Finco, A. Maeder, and R. Grange, Redeposition-free inductively-coupled plasma etching of lithium niobate for integrated photonics, Nanophotonics 12, 1601 (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    Liu, D.-J

    Y.-C. Liu, D.-J. Guo, R. Yang, C.-W. Sun, J.-C. Duan, Y.-X. Gong, Z. Xie, and S.-N. Zhu, Narrowband photonic quantum entanglement with counterpropagating domain engineering, Photonics Research 9, 1998 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    Canalias and V

    C. Canalias and V. Pasiskevicius, Mirrorless optical para- metric oscillator, Nature Photonics 1, 459 (2007)

    2007

  8. [16]

    D’Alessandro, P

    G. D’Alessandro, P. S. J. Russell, and A. Wheeler, Nonlinear dynamics of a backward quasi-phase-matched second-harmonic generator, Physical Review A 55, 3211 (1997)

    1997

  9. [17]

    Conforti, C

    M. Conforti, C. D. Angelis, U. K. Sapaev, and G. As- santo, Pulse shaping via backward second harmonic gen- eration, Opt. Express 16, 2115 (2008)

    2008

  10. [18]

    Graffitti, J

    F. Graffitti, J. Kelly-Massicotte, A. Fedrizzi, and A. M. Bra´ nczyk, Design considerations for high-purity heralded single-photon sources, Phys. Rev. A 98, 053811 (2018)

    2018

  11. [19]

    P. J. Mosley, J. S. Lundeen, B. J. Smith, P. Wasylczyk, A. B. U’Ren, C. Silberhorn, and I. A. Walmsley, Heralded generation of ultrafast single photons in pure quantum states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 133601 (2008)

    2008

  12. [20]

    T. F. Weiss and A. Peruzzo, Nonlinear domain engineer- ing for quantum technologies, Applied Physics Reviews 12 (2025)

    2025

  13. [21]

    Gatti, T

    A. Gatti, T. Corti, and E. Brambilla, Temporal coher- ence and correlation of counterpropagating twin photons, Phys. Rev. A 92, 053809 (2015)

    2015

  14. [22]

    Yan and H

    W.-B. Yan and H. Fan, Single-photon quantum router with multiple output ports, Scientific reports 4, 4820 (2014)

    2014

  15. [23]

    Finco, F

    G. Finco, F. Miserocchi, A. Maeder, J. Kellner, A. Sabatti, R. J. Chapman, and R. Grange, Time-bin entangled bell state generation and tomography on thin- film lithium niobate, npj Quantum Information 10, 135 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    Ayhan, M

    F. Ayhan, M. Ludwig, T. Herr, V. Brasch, and L. G. Villanueva, Fabrication of periodically poled lithium nio- bate waveguides for broadband nonlinear photonics, APL Photonics 10 (2025)

    2025

  17. [25]

    Hwang, N

    E. Hwang, N. Harper, R. Sekine, L. Ledezma, A. Marandi, and S. Cushing, Tunable and efficient ultra- violet generation with periodically poled lithium niobate, Opt. Lett. 48, 3917 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    J. T. Nagy and R. M. Reano, Submicrometer periodic poling of lithium niobate thin films with bipolar precon- ditioning pulses, Opt. Mater. Express 10, 1911 (2020)

    2020

  19. [27]

    Mueller, S

    A. Mueller, S. I. Davis, B. Korzh, R. Valivarthi, A. D. Beyer, R. Youssef, N. Sinclair, C. P. na, M. D. Shaw, and M. Spiropulu, High-rate multiplexed entanglement source based on time-bin qubits for advanced quantum networks, Optica Quantum 2, 64 (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    P. S. Kuo, D. V. Reddy, V. Verma, S. W. Nam, A. Zukauskas, and C. Canalias, Photon-pair production and frequency translation using backward-wave sponta- neous parametric downconversion, Optica Quantum 1, 43 (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    Kellner, A

    J. Kellner, A. Sabatti, T. Kuttner, R. J. Chapman, and R. Grange, Counter-propagating spontaneous parametric down-conversion source in lithium niobate on insulator, arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.21396 (2025)

    2025

  22. [30]

    K.-H. Luo, V. Ansari, M. Massaro, M. Santandrea, C. Eigner, R. Ricken, H. Herrmann, and C. Silberhorn, Counter-propagating photon pair generation in a nonlin- ear waveguide, Optics Express 28, 3215 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    Liu, D.-J

    Y.-C. Liu, D.-J. Guo, K.-Q. Ren, R. Yang, M. Shang, W. Zhou, X. Li, C.-W. Sun, P. Xu, Z. Xie, et al., Obser- vation of frequency-uncorrelated photon pairs generated by counter-propagating spontaneous parametric down- conversion, Scientific Reports 11, 12628 (2021)

    2021

  24. [32]

    C. A. A. Franken, S. S. Ghosh, C. C. Rodrigues, J. Yang, C. J. Xin, S. Lu, D. Witt, G. Joe, G. S. Wiederhecker, K.- J. Boller, and M. Lonˇ car, Milliwatt-level UV generation using sidewall poled lithium niobate (2025), 2503.16785 [physics]

    2025 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Rosenman, K

    G. Rosenman, K. Garb, A. Skliar, M. Oron, D. Eger, and M. Katz, Domain broadening in quasi-phase-matched nonlinear optical devices, Applied physics letters 73, 865 (1998)

    1998

  26. [34]

    Q. Liu, F. Wang, D. Wang, D. Sun, Y. Sang, and H. Liu, Temperature dependent domain-wall moving dynamics of lithium niobate during high electric field periodic poling, Journal of Applied Physics 128 (2020)

    2020

  27. [35]

    Ruesing, J

    M. Ruesing, J. Zhao, and S. Mookherjea, Second har- monic microscopy of poled x-cut thin film lithium nio- bate: Understanding the contrast mechanism, Journal of Applied Physics 126 (2019)

    2019

  28. [36]

    Hunnestad, E

    K. Hunnestad, E. Roede, A. Helvoort, and D. Meier, Characterization of ferroelectric domain walls by scan- ning electron microscopy, Journal of Applied Physics 128, 191102 (2020)

    2020

  29. [37]

    V. V. Aristov, L. S. Kokhanchik, and Y. I. Voronovskii, Voltage contrast of ferroelectric domains of lithium nio- bate in sem, Physica status solidi (a) 86, 133 (1984)

    1984

  30. [38]

    F. Yang, J. Lu, M. Shen, G. Yang, and H. X. Tang, Sym- metric second-harmonic generation in sub-wavelength pe- riodically poled thin film lithium niobate, Optica 11, 1050 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    Yakar, E

    O. Yakar, E. Nitiss, J. Hu, and C.-S. Br` es, Integrated backward second-harmonic generation through optically 9 induced quasi-phase-matching, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 143802 (2023)

    2023

  32. [40]

    X. Xu, T. Wang, P. Chen, C. Zhou, J. Ma, D. Wei, H. Wang, B. Niu, X. Fang, D. Wu, et al., Femtosec- ond laser writing of lithium niobate ferroelectric nan- odomains, Nature 609, 496 (2022)

    2022

  33. [41]

    F. Yang, J. Xie, Y. Zhou, Y. Wang, C. He, Y. Guo, and H. X. Tang, Degeneracy-locked optical parametric oscillator, arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.00936 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.