Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 43 references

Rapid and precise distance measurement using balanced cross-correlation of a single frequency-modulated electro-optic comb

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single frequency-modulated electro-optic comb recovers absolute distance from two zero crossings in under 500 ns, with 5 nm precision.

desk verdict A credible new twist on BCC ranging, but the static null data don't satisfy the integer condition the method depends on, and the MHz refresh claim is under-supported. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.13206 v1 pith:HHMD6U27 submitted 2025-07-17 physics.optics physics.app-ph

Zijian Wang , Zhuoren Wan , Jingwei Luo , Yuan Chen , Mei Yang , Qi Wen , Xiuxiu Zhang , Zhaoyang Wen
show 3 more authors
Shimei Chen Ming Yan Heping Zeng
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsphysics.app-ph
keywords frequency-modulatedelectro-opticcombbalancedcross-correlationtime-of-flightrangingabsolutedistancemeasurementdisplacementtrackingopticalfrequencyLiDARmulti-target
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes that a single electro-optic frequency comb, whose repetition rate is set directly by an RF synthesizer, can serve as both a clock and a ruler for distance. Sweeping the repetition frequency and recording the balanced cross-correlation signal locates two adjacent zero crossings that fix the pulse round-trip time as $\Delta t = 1/\Delta f_r$, so the absolute distance is $D = c/(2n\Delta f_r)$. The authors demonstrate absolute distance readings within 500 ns, displacement tracking at the comb repetition rate of about 172 MHz, and a best precision of 5 nm after 0.3 s of integration, all without phase-locking the comb. If the claims hold, this collapses the usual speed-versus-precision-versus-ambiguity trade-off into one compact, fast, multi-target ranging platform.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the balanced cross-correlator (BCC): a periodically poled KTP crystal and balanced photodetector that produce a null signal when a detection pulse and a reference pulse overlap in time. The comb's repetition frequency is the control dial; because an electro-optic comb lets an RF synthesizer set $f_r$ directly over 100–500 MHz, the system can sweep through several integer-order nulls in microseconds. Two adjacent zero crossings supply $\Delta f_r$, and the slope of the BCC signal supplies a calibrated amplitude-to-displacement factor of 0.64 mm/V that turns subsequent BCC amplitude fluctuations into displacement readings at the comb repetition rate.

What would settle it

Place a fixed mirror at a distance known independently to sub-micrometer accuracy, sweep $f_r$ finely enough to resolve every BCC null, and compare the recovered $m$-values with the true round-trip order; any recovered distance that is an integer multiple of the true value would show that adjacency is not guaranteed. Moving the target during the sweep would provide a second falsifier, since the two crossings would then encode different true distances and the formula $\Delta t = 1/\Delta f_r$ would fail.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that distance can be turned into a frequency difference: when the comb's repetition frequency $f_r$ is swept, the balanced cross-correlation signal is nulled whenever the target round-trip time $\Delta t$ equals an integer multiple $m/f_r$; recording two adjacent nulls at $f_{r1}$ and $f_{r2}$ gives $\Delta t = 1/|f_{r2}-f_{r1}|$, independent of $m$. The distance follows as $D=c/(2n \Delta f_r)$, which is why the measurement is ambiguity-free in principle and needs no phase-locked loop or frequency counter. Experimentally the paper reports absolute distance readouts within 500 ns, single-pulse displacement tracking at 172 MHz, a noise floor of about 5 nm at 0.3 s integration, 60 nm precision at 14.1 km in fiber, and simultaneous ranging of eight targets.

Load-bearing premise

The whole distance formula assumes the two zero crossings found in one sweep belong to adjacent integers $m$ and $m+1$; if the sweep skips an intermediate null, the reported distance would be an integer multiple of the true value.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Absolute distance becomes a fast frequency measurement: one frequency sweep yields a distance in under 500 ns, enabling a 2 MHz refresh rate for absolute readings.
  • Once a target's zero-crossing frequency is selected, displacement can be tracked from BCC amplitude at the comb repetition rate (~172 MHz), which directly gives instantaneous velocity by differentiation.
  • Because the distance formula uses the frequency difference between adjacent crossings rather than a fixed modulation period, the non-ambiguity range is theoretically unlimited, and the dead zone shrinks to about 0.375 m with the 100–500 MHz tuning range.
  • The same platform supports multi-target ranging, demonstrated with eight spatially separated probes, with selective high-speed tracking of individual targets after an initial mapping sweep.
  • Long-distance operation, shown at 14.1 km in fiber with 60 nm precision after 1 s, points toward remote metrology and calibration of long-haul fiber links.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: The integer-ordering assumption could be turned from an assumption into a self-check by recording three consecutive zero crossings; equal spacings between them would verify adjacency on that sweep.
  • Inference: Because the electro-optic comb's $f_r$ is set electronically rather than by cavity length, the same two-crossing logic should port directly to integrated lithium-niobate comb sources, making a chip-scale version of the ranger plausible.
  • Inference: The refresh ceiling is set by the RF synthesizer sweep, not by the optics; a faster or stochastically modulated drive could raise the absolute-update rate, at the cost of reduced per-sweep signal-to-noise ratio.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a time-of-flight ranging technique based on a repetition-frequency-swept electro-optic (EO) comb and balanced cross-correlation (BCC) detection. The central idea is that by locating two adjacent BCC zero-crossings at repetition frequencies fr1 and fr2, the round-trip time is 1/Δfr, yielding absolute distance D=c/(2nΔfr). The authors report absolute distance measurements within 500 ns, displacement tracking at the comb repetition rate (~172 MHz), a ranging precision of 5 nm at 0.3 s integration, and a 14.1 km fiber demonstration with 60 nm precision at 1 s. They also demonstrate multi-target ranging. The experimental sections include comparisons with a CW interferometer for displacement, an Allan deviation analysis, a high-speed moving-target measurement, and a chopped-beam robustness test.

Significance. If the central relation is experimentally established, the combination of nanometer-scale precision, megahertz-level refresh, and a theoretically unlimited ambiguity range in a single-comb architecture would be a notable advance over dual-comb and FMCW ranging. The use of an EO comb whose repetition rate is directly set by an RF synthesizer is an attractive simplification relative to phase-locked mode-locked comb systems. The paper also contains useful engineering demonstrations: interferometer-referenced displacement tracking to ±3 μm, robustness to signal interruption, a long-distance fiber test, and multi-target channelization. However, the central static validation of D=c/(2nΔfr) is internally inconsistent, and several headline claims (2 MHz absolute refresh, 172 MHz tracking, 5 nm precision) are not supported by end-to-end validated measurements. These issues are load-bearing and need substantive revision.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.1] The static validation of the central ranging equation is internally inconsistent. Equation (1) requires the two zero-crossing frequencies to satisfy Δt=m/fr1=(m+1)/fr2, which implies fr1/Δfr must be an integer. With the values reported in §3.1 (fr1=173 MHz, fr2=182.49 MHz, Δfr=9.49 MHz), fr1/Δfr≈18.23, so the round-trip time Δt=1/Δfr≈105.4 ns is 18.23 pulse periods at 173 MHz. A pulse-overlap null cannot occur at 173 MHz if the null at 182.49 MHz is the adjacent order; the discrepancy is about 0.23 of a repetition period (≈1.3 ns), which is many orders of magnitude larger than the claimed relative accuracy. Thus the quoted nulls do not validate Eq. (2). Please provide the raw BCC traces and fitted null frequencies for both crossings, and confirm that fr1/Δfr is an integer, or present and independently verify a model with an additional delay offset.
  2. [§3.2] The headline refresh rate of 2 MHz for absolute distance measurements is not demonstrated end-to-end. Figure 4a shows only raw BCC traces acquired with fm=1 MHz; no absolute distance values are reported at this rate, and the high-speed displacement measurement of the 2.1 m/s target is performed at fm=100 kHz with a 10 μs sampling interval (inset of Fig. 4b). To substantiate the 2 MHz absolute-ranging claim, please show a time series of absolute distance measurements acquired at 2 MHz, or at least quantify the latency from sweep to distance output. Similarly, the 172 MHz displacement tracking in Fig. 5d is shown without an independent truth trace, so its accuracy at single-pulse resolution is unquantified.
  3. [§3.1, §3.3] The precision claims (5 nm at 0.3 s, sub-100 nm accuracy after 100-fold averaging) are derived using the amplitude-to-displacement factor of 0.64 mm/V that is calibrated from the same BCC trace (Fig. 3a) used for those measurements. The Allan deviation in Fig. 3e therefore largely reflects the voltage noise of that trace divided by the fitted slope, not an independent verification of nanometer-level displacement sensitivity. Please provide a cross-check with the CW interferometer at the nanometer level, or a noise-equivalent displacement measurement referenced to a calibrated displacement, and state explicitly that the 5 nm figure is a voltage-noise floor converted by a self-calibrated factor.
  4. [§2.1] The core data-processing step—selecting 'two adjacent zero-crossing points'—is not specified. For an absolute distance measurement, the algorithm must guarantee that the two nulls differ by exactly one integer order m, and it must handle missed nulls, signal dropouts (as in the chopped-beam test), and targets that move during the frequency sweep. Please specify the detection and validation rule used in each reported measurement, and state how often the integer-adjacency condition was verified.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Figure 1 caption] The caption contains typographical errors: 'vaccum' should be 'vacuum', and the text elsewhere uses 'reflective index' instead of 'refractive index'.
  2. [Figure 4b] The inset label says '10 μs sampling interval at fm=100 kHz'; please clarify how this relates to the 2 MHz refresh rate claim.
  3. [Table 2] The 'Minimum data refresh time' for this work is listed as the pulse repetition period (1/fr), but the text claims 2 MHz absolute-distance refresh; please distinguish absolute-distance refresh from displacement-tracking refresh.
  4. [References] Reference [25] is cited as a preprint at arXiv; if it is not yet peer-reviewed, please say so explicitly or cite the published version if available.
  5. [§2.2, §3.1] The text states that the comb's fr can be tuned from 100 to 500 MHz, but the reported measurements use a narrower range (e.g., 173–182.49 MHz and 170–180 MHz in Fig. 5b); please state the sweep range used in each measurement.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Central ranging formula D=c/(2nΔfr) is parameter-free and self-contained; only the amplitude-calibrated precision and tracking figures are mildly self-referential.

  1. other [Sec. 3.1 (Figure 3a–e) and Sec. 3.3 (Figure 5d)]
    "The slope of the linear fit also provides an amplitude-to-displacement conversion factor of 0.64 mm/V, which we employ to assess ranging uncertainty under fixed fr conditions. ... Using the amplitude-to-displacement conversion factor, we quantify displacement deviations across different ranges."

    The 0.64 mm/V factor is obtained by linearly fitting the very BCC zero-crossing trace that constitutes the ranging signal, so converting BCC voltage fluctuations into the quoted 'ranging precision' (1 μm at 2 μs, 5 nm at 0.3 s) and into the 172 MHz 'displacement tracking' data is a self-fitted unit conversion rather than an independent length prediction. This is a mild self-referential calibration: the noise floor is reported in meters using a gain measured from the same transfer function. However, displacement accuracy is separately checked against a CW interferometer, and the absolute-distance relation D=c/(2nΔfr) is parameter-free, so this step does not make the central derivation circular.

full rationale

The central ranging derivation is self-contained: the null condition Δt=m/fr, together with two adjacent zero-crossings at fr1 and fr2, gives Δt=1/Δfr and D=c/(2nΔfr) purely by algebra, with no fitted parameter or imported uniqueness theorem. The method is not reliant on any self-citation chain; cited prior work by the same group (e.g., Ref. 34 on time-stretch spectroscopy, Ref. 25 on 113 km dual-comb ranging) is used for context or component characterization, not as load-bearing support for the distance equation. The only mild self-referential element is the amplitude-to-displacement conversion factor, which is fit from the same BCC signal and then used to report precision and high-speed tracking; this is a calibration rather than a prediction, and the displacement accuracy is independently verified against a CW interferometer, so it does not compromise the main claim. The skeptic's numerical inconsistency in §3.1 (173 MHz and 182.49 MHz give f1/Δfr ≈ 18.23, not an integer) is a correctness/validation concern about how adjacency is guaranteed, not a circularity of the derivation itself. Overall, the paper's core result has independent content and is not forced by definition or by self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the known BCC null condition and on the practical assumption that the two detected zero-crossings are consecutive integer orders. The only fitted quantity is the amplitude-to-displacement calibration factor; no new entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Amplitude-to-displacement conversion factor k = 0.64 mm/V
    Obtained from the slope of the BCC signal (Fig. 3a); used for displacement tracking and precision evaluation. It is a calibration factor, not a fit to the central distance relation.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Balanced cross-correlation signal nulls exactly when the target round-trip time equals an integer multiple of the comb repetition period (Δt = m/fr).
    Fundamental operating principle of BCC, invoked in Section 2.1 and Figure 1.
  • domain assumption Two zero-crossings selected in the frequency sweep correspond to adjacent integer orders m and m+1.
    Used in Section 2.1 to derive Δt = 1/Δfr; the paper does not justify why no intermediate null is missed.
  • domain assumption The comb repetition frequency is set accurately and instantaneously by the RF synthesizer, and the modulation waveform is known, so measured BCC signal timing can be converted to frequency.
    Relied upon in Section 3.2 for the high-speed measurements; depends on the synthesizer calibration and the sinusoidal modulation model.
  • domain assumption The BCC signal is locally linear near the zero-crossing for the displacement ranges reported.
    Supports the amplitude-to-displacement conversion in Sections 3.1 and 3.3; the linear range is not characterized.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Rapid and precise distance measurement using balanced cross-correlation of a single frequency-modulated electro-optic comb." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HHMD6U27

@misc{pith2026250713206,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Rapid and precise distance measurement using balanced cross-correlation of a single frequency-modulated electro-optic comb},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HHMD6U27}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.13206}
}
read the original abstract

Ultra-rapid, high-precision distance metrology is critical for both advanced scientific research and practical applications. However, current light detection and ranging technologies struggle to simultaneously achieve high measurement speed, accuracy, and a large non-ambiguity range. Here, we present a time-of-flight optical ranging technique based on a repetition-frequency-modulated femtosecond electro-optic comb and balanced nonlinear cross-correlation detection. In this approach, a target distance is determined as an integer multiple of the comb repetition period. By rapidly sweeping the comb repetition frequency, we achieve absolute distance measurements within 500 ns and real-time displacement tracking at single-pulse resolution (corresponding to a refresh rate of 172 MHz). Furthermore, our system attains an ultimate ranging precision of 5 nm (with 0.3 s integration time). Our method uniquely integrates nanometer-scale precision, megahertz-level refresh rates, and a theoretically unlimited ambiguity range within a single platform, while also supporting multi-target detection. These advances pave the way for high-speed, high-precision ranging systems in emerging applications such as structural health monitoring, industrial manufacturing, and satellite formation flying.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.13206 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Working principle. a, Distance measurement scheme using a repetition-frequency￾swept electro-optic (EO) comb. The target distance is encoded in the pulse time-of-flight (t) and extracted via repetition-frequency (fr) tuning. b, Detailed balanced cross-correlator design. The balanced signal nullifies when fr satisfies the condition t =m/fr, where the integer m is determined stroboscopically. The target distance D i… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    & Hlubina, P

    Militky, J., Kadulova, M. & Hlubina, P. Highly sensitive displacement measurement based on spectral interferometry and Vernier effect. Opt. Commun. 366, 335–339 (2016)

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    Aasi, J., Abadie, J., Abbott, B. et al. Enhanced sensitivity of the LIGO gravitational wave detector by using squeezed states of light. Nature Photon. 7, 613–619 (2013)

    work page 2013

  3. [3]

    Real-time high -precision baseline measurement of satellite formation flying based on GNSS

    Cai, Y ., Li, Y ., & Wang, Z. Real-time high -precision baseline measurement of satellite formation flying based on GNSS. Advances in Space Research 73, 5171-5187 (2024)

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    Kim, I., Martins, R.J., Jang, J. et al. Nanophotonics for light detection and ranging technology. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 508–524 (2021)

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    C., Bosch, T

    Amann, M. C., Bosch, T. M., Lescure, M., Myllylae, R. A. et al. Laser ranging: a critical review of unusual techniques for distance measurement. Optical engineering 40, 10 -19 (2001)

    work page 2001

  6. [6]

    Optical methods for distance and displacement measurements

    Berkovic, G., Shafir, E. Optical methods for distance and displacement measurements. Adv. Opt. Photon. 4, 441-471 (2012)

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    Shan, Y ., Pang, X. et al. Distance Measurement and Data Analysis for Civil Aviation at 1000 Frames per Second Using Single-Photon Detection Technology. Sensors 25, 3918 (2025)

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Passive optical time -of-flight for non line -of-sight localization

    Boger-Lombard, J., Katz, O. Passive optical time -of-flight for non line -of-sight localization. Nat. Commun. 10, 3343 (2019)

    work page 2019

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    Kim, W., Jang, J., Han, S. et al. Absolute laser ranging by time -of-flight measurement of ultrashort light pulses. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 37, B27-B35 (2020)

    2020

  2. [10]

    & Jalali, B

    Jiang, Y ., Karpf, S. & Jalali, B. Time-stretch LiDAR as a spectrally scanned time -of- flight ranging camera. Nature Photon. 14, 14–18 (2019)

    2019

  3. [11]

    Wang, G. et al. Absolute positioning by multi-wavelength interferometry referenced to the frequency comb of a femtosecond laser. Opt. Express 23, 9121-9129 (2015)

    2015

  4. [12]

    Zhang, W. et al . Comb -referenced frequency -sweeping interferometry for precisely measuring large stepped structures. Applied optics 57, 1247-1253(2018)

    2018

  5. [13]

    Ke, J.C., Dai, J.Y ., Zhang, J.W. et al. Frequency-modulated continuous waves controlled by space-time-coding metasurface with nonlinearly periodic phases. Light Sci. Appl. 11, 273 (2022)

    2022

  6. [14]

    Hänsch, T. W. Nobel lecture: passion for precision. Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 1297–1309 (2006)

    2006

  7. [15]

    Coddington, I., Swann, W., Nenadovic, L. et al. Rapid and precise absolute distance measurements at long range. Nature Photon. 3, 351–356 (2009)

    2009

  8. [16]

    Dual-comb ranging

    Zhu, Z., Wu, G. Dual-comb ranging. Engineering 4, 772-778 (2018). 15

    2018

  9. [17]

    Wu, G., Zhou, S. et al. Yuetang Yang, Kai Ni. Dual-Comb Ranging and Its Applications. Chinese Journal of Lasers 48, 1504002 (2021)

    2021

  10. [18]

    Ren, X. Y . et al . Dual -comb optomechanical spectroscopy. Nat. Commun. 14, 5037 (2023)

    2023

  11. [19]

    Zhu, Z., Xu, G., Ni, K., Zhou, Q. & Wu, G. Synthetic -wavelength-based dual-comb interferometry for fast and precise absolute distance measurement. Opt. Express 26, 5747- 5757 (2018)

    2018

  12. [20]

    Ren, X., Xu, B., Fei, Q. et al . Single-photon counting laser ranging with optical frequency combs. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters 33, 27-30 (2020)

    2020

  13. [21]

    Meng, Y ., Shi, Y ., Zou, K. et al. Long-distance and high-precision ranging with dual - comb nonlinear asynchronous optical sampling. Opt. Express 32, 20166-20174 (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    Li, R. et al. Ultra-rapid dual-comb ranging with an extended non-ambiguity range. Opt. Let. 47, 5309-5312 (2022)

    2022

  15. [23]

    High-precision short-distance dual-comb ranging system without carrier-envelope-offset locking

    Yang, Y ., Qian, S., Zhou, S., & Wu, G. High-precision short-distance dual-comb ranging system without carrier-envelope-offset locking. Opt. Express 32, 33196-33207 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    D., Sinclair, L

    Caldwell, E. D., Sinclair, L. C., Newbury, N. R. & Deschenes, J. -D. The time - programmable frequency comb and its use in quantum -limited ranging. Nature 610, 667– 673 (2022)

    2022

  17. [25]

    Chen, Y . et al . 113 km absolute ranging with nanometer precision. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.05542 (2025)

    2025 doi arXiv

  18. [26]

    Chen, Z., Yan, M., Hänsch, T.W. et al. A phase-stable dual-comb interferometer. Nat. Commun. 9, 3035 (2018)

    2018

  19. [27]

    Chang, B., Tan, T., Du, J. et al. Dispersive Fourier transform based dual -comb ranging. Nat. Commun. 15, 4990 (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    Xin, M., Şafak, K., Peng, M. et al . Attosecond precision multi -kilometer laser - microwave network. Light Sci. Appl. 6, e16187 (2017)

    2017

  21. [29]

    Lee, J., Kim, YJ., Lee, K. et al. Time-of-flight measurement with femtosecond light pulses. Nature Photon. 4, 716–720 (2010)

    2010

  22. [30]

    Lihachev, G., Riemensberger, J., Weng, W. et al. Low-noise frequency-agile photonic integrated lasers for coherent ranging. Nat Commun. 13, 3522 (2022)

    2022

  23. [31]

    Qian, R., Zhou, K.C., Zhang, J. et al . Video-rate high -precision time -frequency multiplexed 3D coherent ranging. Nat. Commun. 13, 1476 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    Chen, J., Li, W., Kang, Z. et al. Single soliton microcomb combined with optical phased array for parallel FMCW LiDAR. Nat. Commun 16, 1056 (2025). 16

    2025

  25. [33]

    Supercontinuum generation by the modulation instability

    Demircan, A., & Bandelow, U. Supercontinuum generation by the modulation instability. Opt. Commun. 244, 181-185 (2005)

    2005

  26. [34]

    Wen, Z., Peng, B., Yan, M. et al. Broadband Up‐Conversion Mid‐Infrared Time‐Stretch Spectroscopy. Laser Photonics Rev. 18, 2300630 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    Wang, J., Lu, Z., Wang, W . et al. Long-distance ranging with high precision using a soliton microcomb. Photonics Research 8, 1964-1972 (2020)

    2020

  28. [36]

    Grosche G., et al., Optical frequency transfer via 146 km fiber link with 10 –19 relative accuracy. Opt. Let. 34, 2270 (2009)

    2009

  29. [37]

    Predehl, K., Grosche, G. et al . A 920-Kilometer Optical Fiber Link for Frequency Metrology at the 19th Decimal Place. Science 336, 441-444 (2012)

    2012

  30. [38]

    Yu, M., Barton III, D., Cheng, R. et al. Integrated femtosecond pulse generator on thin- film lithium niobate. Nature 612, 252–258 (2022)

    2022

  31. [39]

    Hu, Y ., Yu, M., Buscaino, B. et al. High-efficiency and broadband on-chip electro-optic frequency comb generators. Nature Photon. 16, 679–685 (2022)

    2022

  32. [40]

    Zhang, M., Buscaino, B., Wang, C. et al. Broadband electro -optic frequency comb generation in a lithium niobate microring resonator. Nature 568, 373–377 (2019)

    2019

  33. [41]

    High -power, low noise, high gain few -mode fiber amplifier

    Yu, C., Ma, W., & Hu, G. High -power, low noise, high gain few -mode fiber amplifier. Optics Laser Technology, 169, 110008 (2024)

    2024

  34. [42]

    Vines, P., Kuzmenko, K., Kirdoda, J. et al. High performance planar germanium-on- silicon single-photon avalanche diode detectors. Nat Commun. 10, 1086 (2019)

    2019

  35. [43]

    G., et al

    McCarthy, A., Taylor, G. G., et al. High-resolution long-distance depth imaging LiDAR with ultra-low timing jitter superconducting nanowire single -photon detectors. Optica 12, 168-177 (2025)

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.