Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 85 references

JWST Imaging of the Closest Globular Clusters -- VI. The Lowest-Mass Objects in M 4 and the Galactic Bulge

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read JWST observations of M4 show its lowest-mass main-sequence stars carry about 0.4–0.6 dex less oxygen than the cluster's brighter stars.

desk verdict Solid JWST photometry and a believable but model-dependent oxygen-deficit claim; the paper is honest about its trilemma, but the central result will not be secure until the SANDee grid or the reddening is independently checked. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.13564 v1 pith:IMM4FPYN submitted 2025-07-17 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.GA

classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.GA
keywords globularclusterslow-massstarsbrowndwarfsJWSTstellarabundancescolor-magnitudediagramsGalacticbulgemassfunctionultracool
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper analyzes JWST near-infrared images of M4, the closest globular cluster, resolving its main sequence down to roughly 0.1 solar masses and turning up a few extremely red objects consistent with brown dwarfs near 1000 K. Its central claim is that the verified low-mass members, at about 0.1–0.25 solar masses and 3000–3700 K, are redder in F150W2−F322W2 than the closest SANDee isochrone built from post-main-sequence spectroscopy; matching the colors requires lowering the oxygen abundance by 0.4–0.6 dex. The paper argues this is the most likely way out of a three-way ambiguity involving reddening and model errors, and that this is the third globular cluster (after NGC 6397 and 47 Tuc) to show such a deficit. If correct, the finding implies globular cluster ultracool dwarfs are not reliable benchmarks for low-temperature model atmospheres. The same data give a Galactic bulge mass function with a bottom-heavy slope of 0.88 ± 0.36 and an apparent cutoff near 0.15 solar masses.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing comparison is between observed F150W2−F322W2 colors of proper-motion-verified M4 members and the SANDee isochrone grid, which combines MESA evolutionary tracks with SAND model atmospheres and is translated to the JWST photometric system. The color is a sensitive oxygen probe because the 3 $\mu$m H2O absorption band falls inside the F322W2 filter: lowering [O/Fe] weakens H2O absorption, brightens F322W2, and shifts the color redward. The analysis converts the color offset into an abundance offset by counting the fraction of observed members redder than the isochrone as a function of assumed $E(B-V)$ and comparing that fraction with the spread expected from the post-MS [O/Fe] distribution; isochrones with [O/Fe] = 0 and −0.2 bracket the acceptable reddening range.

What would settle it

A second JWST epoch that measures proper motions across the full NIRCam field would confirm or reject membership of the ~1000 K candidates; for the oxygen claim, the decisive test is whether the SAND model's H2O opacity in F322W2 is accurate at 3000–3700 K, which can be checked against benchmark ultracool dwarfs with independently known abundances. If the model underestimates H2O absorption by more than about 50%, the 0.4–0.6 dex oxygen deficit disappears.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a photometric oxygen deficit at the bottom of M4's main sequence. For stars between about 0.1 and 0.25 $M_\odot$ ($T_{\rm eff}$ between about 3000 and 3700 K), the observed F150W2−F322W2 colors are about 0.08 mag redder than the SANDee isochrone that matches the cluster's post-main-sequence abundances ([Fe/H] = −1.1, [O/Fe] = +0.35) at the canonical reddening. Recovering agreement requires either a reddening substantially above the mapped range, a model error equivalent to underestimating H2O opacity in F322W2 by over 50%, or an oxygen abundance 0.4–0.6 dex below the post-MS value; the paper favors the last option because the same offset appears in NGC 6397 and 47 Tuc. On this reading, the chemical composition of globular cluster stars depends on stellar mass at the bottom of the main sequence, and ultracool dwarfs in globular clusters should not be treated as abundance benchmarks. The data also contain candidate brown dwarfs down to about 1000 K, though their cluster membership is unconfirmed without a second epoch.

Load-bearing premise

The inference assumes the stellar models predict the F150W2−F322W2 color of 3000–3700 K stars correctly to about 0.08 mag, and in particular that H2O opacity in the F322W2 band is not underestimated by more than roughly 50%; if the model is wrong in that band, the oxygen deficit disappears even though the photometry stands.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the oxygen deficit is real, M4 becomes the third globular cluster (after NGC 6397 and 47 Tuc) whose lower main sequence is chemically offset from its post-main-sequence stars, making the pattern look general rather than a single-cluster anomaly.
  • Globular cluster ultracool dwarfs lose their status as benchmark objects for low-temperature model atmospheres, because the assumption that their abundances equal those of the brighter, spectroscopically accessible members would be violated.
  • A second JWST epoch over the full NIRCam field would enlarge the proper-motion-confirmed sample by roughly a factor of 20 and would test the four candidate features in the CMD, including the putative brown dwarf sequence and the extended white dwarf cooling sequence.
  • The Galactic bulge mass function along this line of sight is bottom-heavy with slope 0.88 ± 0.36 and appears to cut off near 0.15 $M_\odot$, matching earlier HST-based determinations and demonstrating that JWST photometry can reach the low-mass tail of the bulge population.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves the reddening-versus-model-versus-chemistry trilemma formally open; a targeted check of the SAND grid against field ultracool dwarfs with known oxygen abundances would separate model error from genuine mass-dependent chemistry without waiting for new cluster data.
  • If mass-dependent oxygen depletion is a general globular cluster property, abundance patterns measured in bright giants may not represent the clusters' lowest-mass stars, which would affect inferred enrichment histories and initial mass functions.
  • The apparent ~0.15 $M_\odot$ termination of the bulge mass function is based on only 45 stars; a larger proper-motion sample along the same line of sight could test whether the cutoff is real or a completeness artifact.
  • The same second epoch that confirms the faintest members would also provide the astrometry needed to measure M4's mass function down to the hydrogen-burning limit, turning the candidate brown dwarfs from photometric candidates into dynamical members or field contaminants.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper presents JWST/NIRCam F150W2 and F322W2 photometry of the globular cluster M4, together with HST-based proper motions in the overlap region. After PSF photometry and artificial star tests, the authors compare the lower main sequence (0.1-0.25 Msun, roughly 3000-3700 K) with SANDee isochrones and find that the observed F150W2-F322W2 colors are systematically redder than the isochrone matching the post-MS [Fe/H]=-1.07, [O/Fe]=0.4 from Marino et al. (2008). They interpret the offset as a 0.4-0.6 dex lower oxygen abundance on the lower MS, while explicitly listing two alternative explanations: higher reddening (E(B-V) about 0.56 instead of 0.42-0.46) or a systematic H2O opacity error in the SAND models. They also derive a Galactic bulge mass function with slope alpha=0.88+/-0.36 from background stars, and identify four CMD features, including candidate brown dwarfs, that require a second epoch for membership confirmation.

Significance. If the oxygen deficit is real, the result is important: it would make M4 the third globular cluster with a mass-dependent oxygen offset at the bottom of the main sequence and would caution against using GC ultracool dwarfs as abundance benchmarks. The photometry, artificial star tests, and proper-motion selection are carefully presented, and the data products are released, which are substantial strengths. However, the central claim is intrinsically model-dependent: the color-abundance mapping is provided by the same SANDee/SAND grids that produced the two prior detections, and no independent validation of the F322W2 H2O opacity at 3000-3700 K is given. The significance is therefore conditional on closing this validation gap.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3, Fig. 2] The inference of Delta[O/Fe] approximately -0.4 to -0.6 dex requires that the SANDee grid predict F150W2-F322W2 at 3000-3700 K to about 0.08 mag, but no external check of the grid is provided. The paper's own trilemma lists a >50% H2O opacity error as alternative (2), and this alternative is dismissed as less likely without quantitative support. The cited support from NGC 6397 (Paper IV) and 47 Tuc (Scalco et al. 2025) uses the same SANDee models, so it does not break the degeneracy. I request a comparison with an independent model grid (for example BT-Settl, ATMO, or Sonora) or with benchmark UCDs of known abundance in the same filters, together with an explicit estimate of the F322W2 H2O opacity uncertainty.
  2. [Sec. 3, Fig. 2] The reddening degeneracy is not fully resolved. The paper treats E(B-V) as a free parameter but then anchors it to the Schlafly and Finkbeiner (2011) range 0.36-0.46. Since the line of sight crosses the rho Ophiuchus complex, differential reddening across the 1.9-8 arcmin field could plausibly reach the E(B-V) approximately 0.56 that would remove the oxygen offset. The paper should quantify the reddening dispersion within the field (for example from the CMD width or from foreground/background stars) and propagate it into the fraction-redder curve in Fig. 2.
  3. [Sec. 3 and Sec. 4] The fraction of members redder than the isochrone in Fig. 2 is computed from proper-motion-confirmed members in the HST/JWST overlap, which the text states covers only about 1/20 of the NIRCam field and is concentrated in the most crowded region. The number of stars entering this statistic is not stated. If the sample is of order a few tens, the Poisson uncertainty on the red fraction would be comparable to the 21 +/- 4% expectation and could change the inferred oxygen offset. Please report N and show confidence bands on the red curve.
  4. [Sec. 6] The conclusion that alternative (3), a genuine oxygen deficit, is 'most likely' is not fully supported by the internal consistency of the three clusters: all three detections were made with the same SANDee/SAND grid by largely the same group, so a common model bias would produce the same offset. Without an independent anchor, the conclusion should be phrased as a model-dependent discrepancy, and the paper should avoid the definitive claim that GC UCDs are unsuitable as benchmarks until the model validation is done.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Fig. 4, panel (c)] The axis label in the text describing panel (c) reads '(F322W2-F322W2)' where it should be '(F150W2-F322W2)'.
  2. [Sec. 4] There is a typo in the sentence 'before any definitvie conclusions can be drawn'; it should read 'definitive conclusions'.
  3. [Sec. 3] The phrase 'the theoretical isochrone should be bluer than 21 +/- 4% of the UCD members' is ambiguous; rephrasing as 'the fraction of members redder than the isochrone is expected to be 21 +/- 4%' would make the direction of the offset unambiguous.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the M4 oxygen-offset inference uses an independently constructed theoretical grid on new photometry; model dependence is a correctness risk, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's central claim — that M4 lower-MS stars at 0.1–0.25 Msun are redder than expected for post-MS [O/Fe] ≈ 0.4 — is derived by comparing new JWST F150W2/F322W2 photometry of proper-motion-confirmed members to SANDee isochrones. Those isochrones were constructed in the authors' Paper II from MESA evolution and SAND model atmospheres; they are not fitted to the M4 photometry, and the comparison parameters ([Fe/H] = −1.1, [α/Fe] = 0.35, age 12 Gyr, distance 1.85 kpc, reddening from Schlafly & Finkbeiner) are adopted from independent spectroscopy and literature. The color residual is mapped to [O/Fe] through the model's opacities, which is a standard model-inversion measurement rather than a definitional identity or a fitted-input rename. The paper explicitly lists the main alternative — a >50% H2O-opacity error in F322W2 — as option (2) of its trilemma, and the choice of the oxygen-offset option is aided by prior same-series results (NGC 6397, 47 Tuc). That supporting evidence shares the same SANDee grid, so it is not an independent validation of the model; this is a legitimate external-validity weakness and a correctness risk, but it does not make the M4 measurement circular, because the cited clusters provide independent photometric data and the shared model is not defined in terms of the inferred abundances. No equation in Sect. 3 equates a fitted parameter with the predicted quantity, and no load-bearing argument reduces to a self-citation that is itself unverified. The bulge mass-function section uses the external BASTI grid and compares with the independent Calamida et al. result, with no circular step. Accordingly, no circular step can be exhibited with the required specificity, and the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central oxygen claim rests on three imported assumptions: the SANDee model colors, the post-MS spectroscopic [O/Fe] distribution, and the foreground reddening map. The bulge MF additionally imports a BASTI scaled-solar isochrone and AST completeness. These are not free discoveries of the paper; they are the yardsticks against which the anomalies are measured.

free parameters (3)
  • Interstellar reddening E(B-V) toward M4 = 0.42 (Schlegel/Finkbeiner map); 0.50 chosen for isochrone overlay; 0.56 would erase the O deficit
    The oxygen-abundance comparison is a residual against this assumed foreground reddening; the paper explicitly shows E(B-V)~0.56 would remove the anomaly (Sect. 3, Fig. 2).
  • M4 proper-motion membership radius = 2.5 mas/yr
    Chosen as a generous cut to accommodate PM uncertainties; affects which stars are called cluster members (Sect. 4).
  • Bulge proper-motion membership radius = 7.5 mas/yr (2.5 sigma of assumed bulge dispersion)
    Defines the bulge sample used for the mass function; disk contamination remains a stated uncertainty (Sect. 4).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption SANDee/SAND model atmospheres predict F150W2-F322W2 colors of 3000-3700 K stars accurately, especially H2O opacity in F322W2.
    The oxygen deficit is the residual between observed colors and these model isochrones (Sect. 3); the paper lists 'major systematic errors in SAND atmospheres' as an alternative explanation.
  • domain assumption Spectroscopic [O/Fe] of post-MS stars (Marino et al. 2008) with mean 0.4 and scatter 0.1 dex represents the chemical distribution that would hold on the lower MS under the null hypothesis.
    The expected fraction 21+/-4% redder than the isochrone is computed from this sample (Sect. 3).
  • domain assumption Foreground reddening map (Schlafly & Finkbeiner 2011) bounds E(B-V) between 0.36 and 0.46 along the line of sight.
    If true reddening is higher, the oxygen anomaly disappears (Sect. 3, Fig. 2).
  • domain assumption BASTI scaled-solar isochrone (age 11 Gyr, [Fe/H]=0.06) is representative of the bulge stellar population for mass-luminosity conversion.
    Used to convert F322W2 magnitudes to masses for the bulge MF (Sect. 4).
  • domain assumption Artificial star tests recover completeness and photometric errors for faint sources.
    Completeness corrections for the bulge MF rely on ASTs placed along two fiducial sequences (Sect. 2).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of JWST Imaging of the Closest Globular Clusters -- VI. The Lowest-Mass Objects in M 4 and the Galactic Bulge." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IMM4FPYN

@misc{pith2026250713564,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: JWST Imaging of the Closest Globular Clusters -- VI. The Lowest-Mass Objects in M 4 and the Galactic Bulge},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IMM4FPYN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.13564}
}
read the original abstract

We present `James Webb Space Telescope' observations of M4 -- the closest globular cluster -- that probe the lower Main Sequence down to the hydrogen-burning limit. The unveiled stellar sequence reaches much fainter luminosities than previously possible, revealing a few extremely red objects that are consistent with brown dwarfs as cool as T_eff~1000K. However, the lack of a second JWST epoch presently prevents us from verifying the cluster membership of these objects. By cross-matching our data with archival `Hubble Space Telescope' images, we are able to verify cluster membership for a subset of objects down to T_eff~3000K. The observed color distribution indicate that the lower Main Sequence of M4 is likely deficient in oxygen compared to its higher-mass post-Main Sequence members by ~0.5dex. This feature has now been observed in three different globular clusters (M4, NGC6397 and 47Tuc), suggesting a general trend. Finally, we derive the mass function of the Galactic bulge in the background of M4. The mass function was found to have the bottom-heavy slope of alpha=0.88+/-0.36 and appears to terminate at ~0.15 M_Sun, although the latter value may be overestimated due to the limited sample size.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , Homeier , D

    BT-Settl APACrefauthors Allard , F. , Homeier , D. \ Freytag , B. APACrefauthors \ 2011 12 , Model Atmospheres From Very Low Mass Stars to Brown Dwarfs Model Atmospheres From Very Low Mass Stars to Brown Dwarfs . Cool Stars 16 Cool Stars 16 \ 448, 91. APACrefDOI doi:10.48550/arXiv.1011.5405 APACrefDOI

  2. [2]

    , Mu z i \'c , K

    BD_cluster_benchmarks_3 APACrefauthors Almendros-Abad , V. , Mu z i \'c , K. , Bouy , H. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2023 09 , 677 A26 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346237 APACrefDOI

  3. [3]

    , Gerasimov , R

    SAND APACrefauthors Alvarado , E. , Gerasimov , R. , Burgasser , A J. , Brooks , H. , Aganze , C. \ Theissen , C A. APACrefauthors \ 2024 05 , Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society 8 5 134 . APACrefDOI doi:10.3847/2515-5172/ad4bd7 APACrefDOI

  4. [4]

    , Sarajedini , A

    2008AJ....135.2055A APACrefauthors Anderson , J. , Sarajedini , A. , Bedin , L R. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2008 06 , 135 6 2055-2073 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1088/0004-6256/135/6/2055 APACrefDOI

  5. [5]

    APACrefauthors \ 2019 11 , 245 1 5

    GC_metallicities APACrefauthors Bailin , J. APACrefauthors \ 2019 11 , 245 1 5 . APACrefDOI doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab4812 APACrefDOI

  6. [6]

    \ Lardo , C

    review_main APACrefauthors Bastian , N. \ Lardo , C. APACrefauthors \ 2018 09 , 56 83-136 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051839 APACrefDOI

  7. [8]

    \ Vasiliev , E

    distances APACrefauthors Baumgardt , H. \ Vasiliev , E. APACrefauthors \ 2021 08 , 505 4 5957-5977 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1474 APACrefDOI

  8. [9]

    , Anderson , J

    2001ApJ...560L..75B APACrefauthors Bedin , L R. , Anderson , J. , King , I R. \ Piotto , G. APACrefauthors \ 2001 10 , 560 1 L75-L78 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1086/324174 APACrefDOI

Show all 85 references
  1. [11]

    , King , I R

    2008ApJ...678.1279B APACrefauthors Bedin , L R. , King , I R. , Anderson , J. , Piotto , G. , Salaris , M. , Cassisi , S. \ Serenelli , A. APACrefauthors \ 2008 05 , 678 2 1279-1291 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1086/529370 APACrefDOI

  2. [12]

    , Libralato , M

    paperV APACrefauthors Bedin , L R. , Libralato , M. , Salaris , M. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2025 02 , Astronomische Nachrichten 346 2 e20240125 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1002/asna.20240125 APACrefDOI

  3. [13]

    , Nardiello , D

    paperI APACrefauthors Bedin , L R. , Nardiello , D. , Salaris , M. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2024 07 , Astronomische Nachrichten 345 e20240039 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1002/asna.20240039 APACrefDOI

  4. [14]

    , Piotto , G

    2003MmSAI..74..436B APACrefauthors Bedin , L R. , Piotto , G. , King , I R. \ Anderson , J. APACrefauthors \ 2003 1 01 , 74 436 . APACrefDOI doi:10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0303230 APACrefDOI

  5. [15]

    , Piotto , G

    2003AJ....126..247B APACrefauthors Bedin , L R. , Piotto , G. , King , I R. \ Anderson , J. APACrefauthors \ 2003 2 07 , 126 1 247-254 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1086/375646 APACrefDOI

  6. [16]

    , Salaris , M

    2009ApJ...697..965B APACrefauthors Bedin , L R. , Salaris , M. , Piotto , G. , Anderson , J. , King , I R. \ Cassisi , S. APACrefauthors \ 2009 06 , 697 2 965-979 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1088/0004-637X/697/2/965 APACrefDOI

  7. [17]

    , Anderson , J

    2017ApJ...842....6B APACrefauthors Bellini , A. , Anderson , J. , Bedin , L R. , King , I R. , van der Marel , R P. , Piotto , G. \ Cool , A. APACrefauthors \ 2017 06 , 842 1 6 . APACrefDOI doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa7059 APACrefDOI

  8. [18]

    , Gerhard , O E

    corotation_radius APACrefauthors Binney , J. , Gerhard , O E. , Stark , A A. , Bally , J. \ Uchida , K I. APACrefauthors \ 1991 09 , 252 210 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1093/mnras/252.2.210 APACrefDOI

  9. [19]

    APACrefauthors \ 2004 11 , 155 1 191-207

    adam_gap APACrefauthors Burgasser , A J. APACrefauthors \ 2004 11 , 155 1 191-207 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1086/424386 APACrefDOI

  10. [20]

    , Schneider , A C

    AdamTDwarfClassification APACrefauthors Burgasser , A J. , Schneider , A C. , Meisner , A M. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2024 11 , arXiv e-prints arXiv:2411.01378 . APACrefDOI doi:10.48550/arXiv.2411.01378 APACrefDOI

  11. [21]

    , Ludwig , H G

    solar_oxygen APACrefauthors Caffau , E. , Ludwig , H G. , Steffen , M. , Freytag , B. \ Bonifacio , P. APACrefauthors \ 2011 02 , 268 2 255-269 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1007/s11207-010-9541-4 APACrefDOI

  12. [22]

    , Sahu , K C

    calamida2015 APACrefauthors Calamida , A. , Sahu , K C. , Casertano , S. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2015 09 , 810 1 8 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1088/0004-637X/810/1/8 APACrefDOI

  13. [23]

    , Clayton , G C

    CC89 APACrefauthors Cardelli , J A. , Clayton , G C. \ Mathis , J S. APACrefauthors \ 1989 10 , 345 245 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1086/167900 APACrefDOI

  14. [24]

    , Gratton , R G

    GC_ages APACrefauthors Carretta , E. , Gratton , R G. , Clementini , G. \ Fusi Pecci , F. APACrefauthors \ 2000 04 , 533 1 215-235 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1086/308629 APACrefDOI

  15. [25]

    \ Baraffe , I

    BC_origin APACrefauthors Chabrier , G. \ Baraffe , I. APACrefauthors \ 1997 11 , 327 1039-1053 . APACrefDOI doi:10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9704118 APACrefDOI

  16. [26]

    , Dotter , A

    MIST APACrefauthors Choi , J. , Dotter , A. , Conroy , C. , Cantiello , M. , Paxton , B. \ Johnson , B D. APACrefauthors \ 2016 Jun , The Astrophysical Journal 823 2 102 . APACrefDOI doi:10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/102 APACrefDOI

  17. [27]

    \ Da Costa , G S

    early_NaAl_1 APACrefauthors Cottrell , P L. \ Da Costa , G S. APACrefauthors \ 1981 04 , 245 L79-L82 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1086/183527 APACrefDOI

  18. [28]

    , Robberto , M

    BD_cluster_benchmarks_4 APACrefauthors Da Rio , N. , Robberto , M. , Hillenbrand , L A. , Henning , T. \ Stassun , K G. APACrefauthors \ 2012 03 , 748 1 14 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1088/0004-637X/748/1/14 APACrefDOI

  19. [29]

    , Bedin , L R

    BD_hunt APACrefauthors Dieball , A. , Bedin , L R. , Knigge , C. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2019 06 , 486 2 2254-2264 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1093/mnras/stz996 APACrefDOI

  20. [30]

    , Bedin , L R

    2016ApJ...817...48D APACrefauthors Dieball , A. , Bedin , L R. , Knigge , C. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2016 01 , 817 1 48 . APACrefDOI doi:10.3847/0004-637X/817/1/48 APACrefDOI

  21. [31]

    , Gerasimov , R

    BD_binary_benchmarks_4 APACrefauthors Fisher , L. , Gerasimov , R. , Kirby , E N. , Burgasser , A J. , Hsu , C C. \ Weiss , L M. APACrefauthors \ 2024 09 , Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society 8 9 227 . APACrefDOI doi:10.3847/2515-5172/ad79f0 APACrefDOI

  22. [32]

    , Manser , C J

    2021MNRAS.504.2707G APACrefauthors Gentile Fusillo , N P. , Manser , C J. , G \"a nsicke , B T. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2021 06 , 504 2 2707-2726 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1093/mnras/stab992 APACrefDOI

  23. [33]

    , Bedin , L R

    paperII APACrefauthors Gerasimov , R. , Bedin , L R. , Burgasser , A J. , Apai , D. , Nardiello , D. , Alvarado , E. \ Anderson , J. APACrefauthors \ 2024 08 , 971 1 65 . APACrefDOI doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5551 APACrefDOI

  24. [34]

    , Burgasser , A J

    2024ApJ...961..139G APACrefauthors Gerasimov , R. , Burgasser , A J. , Caiazzo , I. , Homeier , D. , Richer , H B. , Correnti , M. \ Heyl , J. APACrefauthors \ 2024 01 , 961 1 139 . APACrefDOI doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad08bf APACrefDOI

  25. [35]

    , Burgasser , A J

    roman_omega_cen APACrefauthors Gerasimov , R. , Burgasser , A J. , Homeier , D. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2022 05 , 930 1 24 . APACrefDOI doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac61e5 APACrefDOI

  26. [36]

    , Clayton , G C

    2023ApJ...950...86G APACrefauthors Gordon , K D. , Clayton , G C. , Decleir , M. , Fitzpatrick , E L. , Massa , D. , Misselt , K A. \ Tollerud , E J. APACrefauthors \ 2023 06 , 950 2 86 . APACrefDOI doi:10.3847/1538-4357/accb59 APACrefDOI

  27. [37]

    , Amorim , A

    2019A&A...625L..10G APACrefauthors GRAVITY Collaboration , Abuter , R. , Amorim , A. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2019 05 , 625 L10 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935656 APACrefDOI

  28. [38]

    , Nardiello , D

    2023AN....34430006G APACrefauthors Griggio , M. , Nardiello , D. \ Bedin , L R. APACrefauthors \ 2023 03 , Astronomische Nachrichten 344 3 e20230006 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1002/asna.20230006 APACrefDOI

  29. [39]

    APACrefauthors \ 1996 10 , 112 1487

    GC_distances APACrefauthors Harris , W E. APACrefauthors \ 1996 10 , 112 1487 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1086/118116 APACrefDOI

  30. [40]

    , Ackerman , A

    cloud_model_comparison APACrefauthors Helling , C. , Ackerman , A. , Allard , F. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2008 12 , 391 4 1854-1873 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13991.x APACrefDOI

  31. [41]

    , Stetson , P B

    2012HendricksM4red APACrefauthors Hendricks , B. , Stetson , P B. , VandenBerg , D A. \ Dall'Ora , M. APACrefauthors \ 2012 07 , 144 1 25 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1088/0004-6256/144/1/25 APACrefDOI

  32. [42]

    , Baumgardt , H

    GC_masses APACrefauthors Hilker , M. , Baumgardt , H. , Sollima , A. \ Bellini , A. APACrefauthors \ 2020 01 , Galactic Globular Clusters: A new catalog of masses, structural parameters, velocity dispersion profiles, proper motions and space orbits Galactic Globular Clusters: ...

  33. [43]

    , Wang , J J

    BD_binary_benchmarks_2 APACrefauthors Hsu , C C. , Wang , J J. , Xuan , J W. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2024 08 , 971 1 9 . APACrefDOI doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad58d3 APACrefDOI

  34. [44]

    , Ivezi \'c , Z

    halo_fraction APACrefauthors Juri \'c , M. , Ivezi \'c , Z . , Brooks , A. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2008 02 , 673 2 864-914 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1086/523619 APACrefDOI

  35. [45]

    , Richer , H B

    2012AJ....143...11K APACrefauthors Kalirai , J S. , Richer , H B. , Anderson , J. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2012 01 , 143 1 11 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1088/0004-6256/143/1/11 APACrefDOI

  36. [46]

    , Ji , A P

    evan_M92 APACrefauthors Kirby , E N. , Ji , A P. \ Kovalev , M. APACrefauthors \ 2023 11 , 958 1 45 . APACrefDOI doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acf309 APACrefDOI

  37. [47]

    , Marocco , F

    local_census APACrefauthors Kirkpatrick , J D. , Marocco , F. , Gelino , C R. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2024 04 , 271 2 55 . APACrefDOI doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ad24e2 APACrefDOI

  38. [48]

    APACrefauthors \ 1963 05 , 137 1121

    HBL_3 APACrefauthors Kumar , S S. APACrefauthors \ 1963 05 , 137 1121 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1086/147589 APACrefDOI

  39. [49]

    , Gerasimov , R

    BasicATLAS APACrefauthors Larkin , M M. , Gerasimov , R. \ Burgasser , A J. APACrefauthors \ 2023 01 , 165 1 2 . APACrefDOI doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac9b43 APACrefDOI

  40. [50]

    APACrefauthors \ 2005 05 , 359 1 211-222

    IMF_characteristic_mass_4 APACrefauthors Larson , R B. APACrefauthors \ 2005 05 , 359 1 211-222 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08881.x APACrefDOI

  41. [51]

    , Gerasimov , R

    paperIV APACrefauthors Libralato , M. , Gerasimov , R. , Bedin , L. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2024 10 , 690 A371 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451295 APACrefDOI

  42. [52]

    , Lodieu , N

    BD_cluster_benchmarks_1 APACrefauthors Manjavacas , E. , Lodieu , N. , B \'e jar , V J S. , Zapatero-Osorio , M R. , Boudreault , S. \ Bonnefoy , M. APACrefauthors \ 2020 02 , 491 4 5925-5950 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3441 APACrefDOI

  43. [53]

    , Milone , A P

    2024ApJ...965..189M APACrefauthors Marino , A F. , Milone , A P. , Legnardi , M V. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2024 04 , 965 2 189 . APACrefDOI doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad293e APACrefDOI

  44. [54]

    , Villanova , S

    2008A&A...490..625M APACrefauthors Marino , A F. , Villanova , S. , Piotto , G. , Milone , A P. , Momany , Y. , Bedin , L R. \ Medling , A M. APACrefauthors \ 2008 11 , 490 2 625-640 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200810389 APACrefDOI

  45. [55]

    \ Robinson , T D

    modelling_review APACrefauthors Marley , M S. \ Robinson , T D. APACrefauthors \ 2015 08 , 53 279-323 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122522 APACrefDOI

  46. [56]

    , Seager , S

    clouds_and_chemistry APACrefauthors Marley , M S. , Seager , S. , Saumon , D. , Lodders , K. , Ackerman , A S. , Freedman , R S. \ Fan , X. APACrefauthors \ 2002 03 , 568 1 335-342 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1086/338800 APACrefDOI

  47. [57]

    , Schneider , A C

    LOWZ APACrefauthors Meisner , A M. , Schneider , A C. , Burgasser , A J. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2021 07 , 915 2 120 . APACrefDOI doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac013c APACrefDOI

  48. [58]

    , Marino , A F

    no_mass_variations_3 APACrefauthors Milone , A P. , Marino , A F. , Bedin , L R. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2019 04 , 484 3 4046-4053 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1093/mnras/stz277 APACrefDOI

  49. [59]

    , Marino , A F

    2023MNRAS.522.2429M APACrefauthors Milone , A P. , Marino , A F. , Dotter , A. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2023 06 , 522 2 2429-2447 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1041 APACrefDOI

  50. [60]

    , Fortney , J J

    ElfOwl APACrefauthors Mukherjee , S. , Fortney , J J. , Morley , C V. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2024 03 , 963 1 73 . APACrefDOI doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad18c2 APACrefDOI

  51. [61]

    , Bedin , L R

    2022MNRAS.517..484N APACrefauthors Nardiello , D. , Bedin , L R. , Burgasser , A. , Salaris , M. , Cassisi , S. , Griggio , M. \ Scalco , M. APACrefauthors \ 2022 11 , 517 1 484-497 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2659 APACrefDOI

  52. [62]

    , Bedin , L R

    2023MNRAS.525.2585N APACrefauthors Nardiello , D. , Bedin , L R. , Griggio , M. , Salaris , M. , Scalco , M. \ Cassisi , S. APACrefauthors \ 2023 10 , 525 2 2585-2604 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2445 APACrefDOI

  53. [63]

    , Griggio , M

    2023MNRAS.521L..39N APACrefauthors Nardiello , D. , Griggio , M. \ Bedin , L R. APACrefauthors \ 2023 05 , 521 1 L39-L43 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slad021 APACrefDOI

  54. [64]

    , Bildsten , L

    MESA APACrefauthors Paxton , B. , Bildsten , L. , Dotter , A. , Herwig , F. , Lesaffre , P. \ Timmes , F. APACrefauthors \ 2011 01 , 192 1 3 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/3 APACrefDOI

  55. [65]

    , Cantiello , M

    MESA_2 APACrefauthors Paxton , B. , Cantiello , M. , Arras , P. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2013 09 , 208 1 4 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/4 APACrefDOI

  56. [66]

    , Marchant , P

    MESA_3 APACrefauthors Paxton , B. , Marchant , P. , Schwab , J. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2015 09 , 220 1 15 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/15 APACrefDOI

  57. [67]

    , Schwab , J

    MESA_4 APACrefauthors Paxton , B. , Schwab , J. , Bauer , E B. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2018 02 , 234 2 34 . APACrefDOI doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aaa5a8 APACrefDOI

  58. [68]

    , Smolec , R

    MESA_5 APACrefauthors Paxton , B. , Smolec , R. , Schwab , J. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2019 07 , 243 1 10 . APACrefDOI doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab2241 APACrefDOI

  59. [69]

    , Tremblin , P

    2020A&A...637A..38P APACrefauthors Phillips , M W. , Tremblin , P. , Baraffe , I. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2020 05 , 637 A38 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937381 APACrefDOI

  60. [70]

    , Cassisi , S

    pietrinferni2004 APACrefauthors Pietrinferni , A. , Cassisi , S. , Salaris , M. \ Castelli , F. APACrefauthors \ 2004 09 , 612 1 168-190 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1086/422498 APACrefDOI

  61. [71]

    , Jones , H R A

    BD_cluster_benchmarks_5 APACrefauthors Pinfield , D J. , Jones , H R A. , Lucas , P W. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2006 05 , 368 3 1281-1295 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10213.x APACrefDOI

  62. [72]

    , Ceva , W

    BD_binary_benchmarks_1 APACrefauthors Rickman , E L. , Ceva , W. , Matthews , E C. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2024 04 , 684 A88 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347906 APACrefDOI

  63. [73]

    , Faherty , J K

    BD_binary_benchmarks_5 APACrefauthors Rothermich , A. , Faherty , J K. , Bardalez-Gagliuffi , D. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2024 06 , 167 6 253 . APACrefDOI doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad324e APACrefDOI

  64. [74]

    , Bergeron , P

    HBL_4 APACrefauthors Saumon , D. , Bergeron , P. , Lunine , J I. , Hubbard , W B. \ Burrows , A. APACrefauthors \ 1994 03 , 424 333 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1086/173892 APACrefDOI

  65. [75]

    , Gerasimov , R

    2025A&A...694A..68S APACrefauthors Scalco , M. , Gerasimov , R. , Bedin , L R. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2025 02 , 694 A68 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452907 APACrefDOI

  66. [76]

    , Gerasimov , R

    2024AN....34540018S APACrefauthors Scalco , M. , Gerasimov , R. , Bedin , L R. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2024 06 , Astronomische Nachrichten 345 5 e20240018 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1002/asna.20240018 APACrefDOI

  67. [77]

    , Libralato , M

    paperIII APACrefauthors Scalco , M. , Libralato , M. , Gerasimov , R. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2024 09 , 689 A59 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450589 APACrefDOI

  68. [78]

    \ Finkbeiner , D P

    reddening_map APACrefauthors Schlafly , E F. \ Finkbeiner , D P. APACrefauthors \ 2011 08 , 737 2 103 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/103 APACrefDOI

  69. [79]

    \ Krumholz , M R

    IMF_characteristic_mass_1 APACrefauthors Sharda , P. \ Krumholz , M R. APACrefauthors \ 2022 01 , 509 2 1959-1984 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2921 APACrefDOI

  70. [80]

    \ Yurchenko , S N

    ExoMol APACrefauthors Tennyson , J. \ Yurchenko , S N. APACrefauthors \ 2012 09 , 425 1 21-33 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21440.x APACrefDOI

  71. [81]

    , Brogaard , K

    vdb13 APACrefauthors VandenBerg , D A. , Brogaard , K. , Leaman , R. \ Casagrande , L. APACrefauthors \ 2013 10 , 775 2 134 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1088/0004-637X/775/2/134 APACrefDOI

  72. [82]

    , Boffin , H M J

    IMF_characteristic_mass_3 APACrefauthors Whitworth , A P. , Boffin , H M J. \ Francis , N. APACrefauthors \ 1998 09 , 299 2 554-561 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01813.x APACrefDOI

  73. [83]

    , Izumi , N

    BD_cluster_benchmarks_2 APACrefauthors Yasui , C. , Izumi , N. , Saito , M. , Lau , R M. , Kobayashi , N. \ Ressler , M E. APACrefauthors \ 2024 11 , 975 1 152 . APACrefDOI doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad73a2 APACrefDOI

  74. [84]

    , Jacobsen , D

    BD_binary_benchmarks_3 APACrefauthors Zhou , T. , Jacobsen , D. , Vazquez-Segovia , B. , Hsu , C C. , Theissen , C A. \ Burgasser , A J. APACrefauthors \ 2023 03 , Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society 7 3 50 . APACrefDOI doi:10.3847/2515-5172/acc396 APACrefDOI

  75. [85]

    , Milone , A

    no_mass_variations_1 APACrefauthors Ziliotto , T. , Milone , A. , Marino , A F. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2023 08 , 953 1 62 . APACrefDOI doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acde76 APACrefDOI

  76. [86]

    , Renzini , A

    zoccali2003 APACrefauthors Zoccali , M. , Renzini , A. , Ortolani , S. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2003 03 , 399 931-956 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20021604 APACrefDOI

  77. [87]

    write newline

    " write newline " cite write " FUNCTION editor.postfix editor num.names #1 > "( )" "( )" if FUNCTION editor.trans.postfix editor num.names #1 > "( )" "( )" if FUNCTION trans.postfix translator num.names #1 > "( )" "( )" if FUNCTION authors.editors.reflist.apa5 'field := 'dot :...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.