Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Density of finitely supported invariant measures for automorphisms of compact abelian groups

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Every invariant measure of a compact abelian group automorphism satisfying the descending chain condition is a weak-* limit of finitely supported invariant measures, with ergodic approximants when the automorphism is Haar-ergodic.

desk verdict Strong result with a genuinely useful new specification variant, but the ergodic half and the product counterexample are not proved as written; both gaps look fixable. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.14113 v1 pith:TWGGHIGO submitted 2025-07-18 math.DS math.GR

Rotem Yaari This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DSmath.GR MSC 37A0537B0537A45
keywords abeliangroupdynamicalsystemsdescendingchainconditioninvariantmeasuresperiodicpartialspecificationsolenoidsHilbert-SchmidtstabilityLivshitztheorem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves that for a compact metrizable abelian group with a continuous automorphism satisfying the descending chain condition, every invariant probability measure is a weak-* limit of finitely supported invariant measures; if the automorphism is ergodic with respect to Haar measure, the approximants can be chosen ergodic and finitely supported. This settles a question posed by Levit and Vigdorovich and by Eckhardt, and it is new even for automorphisms of the torus with block-diagonal hyperbolic and unipotent blocks. The proof's engine is a new 'partial specification' property, weaker than classical specification, that still yields dense periodic measures and is preserved under group extensions. Two corollaries follow: Hilbert-Schmidt stability for finitely generated semidirect products Z⋉G with G countable abelian, and a Livshitz-type theorem describing the uniform closure of coboundaries by vanishing on periodic orbits. A separate construction shows that, for general dynamical systems, the property of having dense periodic measures is not preserved under products.

What carries the argument

Partial specification (Definition 4.2) is the central object: a system satisfies partial specification with periods P, a bounded-gaps subset of N, if every sufficiently spaced finite collection of orbit segments can be ε-partially traced—approximated on all but an ε-fraction of each segment—by a point of prescribed period n ∈ P, for all sufficiently large n. Unlike full specification, partial specification is preserved under abelian group extensions (Proposition 4.5). For ergodic dcc systems, the paper establishes partial specification by first decomposing the system via the Schmidt-Miles-Thomas structure theorem (Proposition 3.1) into a finite chain whose quotients are Bernoulli shifts or S-adic solenoids with irreducible non-cyclotomic characteristic polynomial, then proving partial specification for each solenoid via adapted p-adic norms and bounded-below sets of periods, and finally lifting through extensions. For the non-ergodic part, a dynamically unipotent toral factor is handled by the measure classification of unipotent toral automorphisms.

What would settle it

Find a dcc abelian group automorphism, for example an S-adic solenoid with irreducible and non-cyclotomic characteristic polynomial, and an ergodic invariant measure μ such that some open set U has μ(U) > 0 while every sufficiently long periodic orbit spends negligible time in U; that would contradict the predicted partial specification and the density of periodic measures.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 1.1: if (X,T) is an abelian group dynamical system—a compact metrizable abelian group with a continuous automorphism—and T satisfies the descending chain condition (every decreasing chain of T-invariant closed subgroups stabilizes), then the finitely supported invariant probability measures are weak-* dense in the space of all invariant probability measures. In the Haar-ergodic case, the dense subset can be taken to consist of finitely supported ergodic measures. The result answers a question posed by Levit and Vigdorovich and by Eckhardt, and it is new even for toral automorphisms combining hyperbolic and unipotent blocks, which had previously been treated only in separate cases.

Load-bearing premise

The argument rests on the external structure theorem that every ergodic dcc automorphism is a continuous factor of a finite chain of Bernoulli shifts and solenoids with irreducible non-cyclotomic characteristic polynomials; if that decomposition failed, the partial specification proof and with it the ergodic density statement would collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every invariant probability measure of a dcc abelian group automorphism, including non-ergodic ones, is a weak-* limit of measures supported on finite orbits; in the Haar-ergodic case, the approximating finite-orbit measures can themselves be made ergodic.
  • The result answers the question posed by Levit and Vigdorovich and by Eckhardt, and extends known dense-periodic-measures results from hyperbolic and ergodic toral automorphisms to all dcc abelian group automorphisms, including mixed hyperbolic-unipotent block diagonal toral automorphisms.
  • Corollary 1.5 follows: every finitely generated group of the form Z⋉G, with G countable abelian, is Hilbert-Schmidt stable, via the established equivalence between dense periodic measures and Hilbert-Schmidt stability.
  • Corollary 1.6 follows: a continuous function on a dcc abelian group automorphism is a uniform limit of coboundaries exactly when it sums to zero along every periodic orbit.
  • Theorem 1.3 shows that, in general topological dynamics, the property of dense periodic measures is not closed under products, so the paper's group-extension stability of partial specification is essential for the main theorem.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The partial specification property is likely to deliver other specification-type consequences for dcc abelian group automorphisms, such as periodic orbit counting laws, exponential recurrence, or large-deviation estimates, since the property is strong enough to substitute for specification in several standard arguments.
  • Because the proof routes through solenoids and adapted p-adic norms, the same technique may extend to algebraic actions of higher-rank abelian groups on compact abelian groups under a dcc-type hypothesis, provided the structure theorem has an analogue in that setting.
  • The X2 × X3 counterexample suggests that 'dense periodic measures' is a delicate property for general dynamical systems; the extension-friendly object is the stronger partial specification, so systems with partial specification may be better suited to stability and cohomological questions than systems with merely dense periodic measures.
  • The Livshitz corollary might admit a sharper, non-uniform version: with partial specification replacing manifold regularity assumptions, the uniform closure in Corollary 1.6 could perhaps be replaced by a genuine coboundary statement for continuous functions on ergodic systems; the paper hints at such a version but leaves the details aside.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. This paper studies continuous automorphisms of compact metrizable abelian groups satisfying the descending chain condition (dcc). The main theorem (Theorem 1.1) asserts that finitely supported invariant measures are weak-* dense in the space of all invariant probability measures, and that under Haar-ergodicity the finitely supported ergodic invariant measures are dense. The proof introduces a notion of partial specification (Definition 4.2), proves it for solenoids and shows that it is preserved under group extensions, and combines it with a structure theorem for dcc abelian group automorphisms and an analysis of unipotent toral automorphisms. The paper also derives a Hilbert-Schmidt stability result for Z⋉G, a Livshitz-type coboundary characterization, and a counterexample showing that dense periodic measures do not pass to products in general dynamical systems.

Significance. If the main theorem were fully established, it would resolve an open question of Levit and Vigdorovich and of Eckhardt, and the partial specification property would be a useful new tool for algebraic dynamical systems. The paper's detailed contributions are substantial: the solenoid partial specification (Propositions 5.7-5.9), the extension result (Proposition 4.5), the unipotent measure classification (Proposition 6.1), and the product counterexample (Section 9) are concrete and largely self-contained. However, the proof of the ergodic density theorem is only sketched, and since that theorem is the headline result, the significance cannot be assessed as fully realized in the present version.

major comments (2)
  1. [§5.3, Theorem 5.13] The proof of the ergodic half of Theorem 1.1 is not actually supplied. The text states that the argument is only sketched and technical details are omitted, and it appeals by analogy to [Mar80, Sig70, GK18]. This is load-bearing: Theorem 1.1's second assertion and the Y=X case of Proposition 7.4 both depend on it. A complete proof must convert the partial tracing guarantees of Definition 4.2 into a bound on d_M(m_{T,y,n}, μ), using Lemma 7.3 in the manner of Proposition 7.4. Specifically, one must control the ε-fraction of bad indices in each traced segment, the M-point gaps between segments, and the tail n−b_r, using the bounded-gap property of P and the freedom to choose n∈P with n≥(1+ε)b_r. None of these estimates appears. The assertion that partial specification is 'no different' from full periodic specification does not address the fact that Definition 4.2 only traces (1−ε) of each segment and imposes no upper bound on n−b_r. Without these estimates, the ergodic density theorem is unproved as written.
  2. [§7, Proposition 7.4, first paragraph] The case Y=X is dismissed with the sentence 'the density of periodic measures follows from the partial specification (as in the proof of Theorem 5.13).' Since Theorem 5.13 is not proved, this gap also propagates to the proof of Theorem 7.8 in the case X2=X1. The author should either supply the missing estimates once and use them in both places, or prove the Y=X case directly.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§7, proof of Proposition 7.4, after Eq. (7.3)] The sentence 'Since q can be any arbitrarily large number in cN, by enlarging q if necessary we may assume that q ≥ N and that q ∈ P⊆cN' is logically imprecise, because P is only a bounded-gap subset of cN. One should explicitly choose q∈P∩[Q,∞) and then apply Proposition 6.7 to that q.
  2. [§5.1, Lemma 5.10] The choice of δ that makes Eq. (5.15) hold would be clearer if stated explicitly, for example δ < (1/2) min_{i,m} d_G(g_i^{cm}, 1), rather than left as an implicit sufficiently small choice.
  3. [Section 9, Lemma 9.2] The phrase 'since Y is compact, the closures coincide in Y and Xi' is unclear; the argument only needs that the chosen open neighborhoods in Y are also open in Xi, which follows from the subspace topology.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the main results are derived from external structure theorems and independent specification-style arguments; the only flagged issue is an explicitly partial proof of Theorem 5.13, which is an incompleteness concern, not circular reasoning.

full rationale

No circular step can be exhibited. The non-ergodic half of Theorem 1.1 is proved in Theorem 7.8 using Schmidt's external dcc decomposition (Proposition 3.3, citing [Sch95]), the partial-specification theorem (Theorem 1.2), and the extension result Proposition 7.4; none of these inputs assumes dense periodic measures. The ergodic half (Theorem 5.13) uses partial specification to approximate ergodic-generic orbit segments by periodic orbits; it does not define the target in terms of itself or fit a parameter and rename it a prediction. Theorem 1.2 is itself built from the external Miles–Thomas/Schmidt structure theorem (Proposition 3.1), the solenoid partial-specification Proposition 5.7, and the extension lemma Proposition 4.5; Proposition 5.7 is derived from adapted norms, hyperbolicity estimates, and the bounded-below set construction (Definition 5.6, Corollary 5.11), not from the desired conclusion. Corollary 1.5 invokes the external equivalence in [LV24, Proposition 10.2] or [ES23, Corollary 5.19] only after Theorem 1.1 is established, and none of those cited works is authored by Rotem Yaari, so no self-citation chain is load-bearing. Corollary 1.6 uses Katok's external characterization [Kat03, Proposition 10.13], and Theorem 1.3 is an independent construction. The one passage that deserves explicit flagging is §5.3: the paper states, without full proof, that partial specification implies dense ergodic periodic measures, writing 'we only sketch the proof and omit the technical details'. The missing estimates controlling bad indices, forced gaps, and the unconstrained tail could conceal a genuine gap in the ergodic half of Theorem 1.1. That is a completeness and correctness risk, not circularity: the sketched argument does not reduce its conclusion to its inputs by definition or by a self-citation chain. Therefore the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities. The proof leans on a handful of substantial external theorems from algebraic dynamics, measure classification, and p-adic analysis, listed above.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Shah's measure classification theorem for unipotent actions on homogeneous spaces
    Used to classify ergodic measures of unipotent toral automorphisms in Proposition 6.1.
  • domain assumption Schmidt's structure theory for automorphisms of compact abelian groups satisfying dcc
    Provides the finite chain decomposition in Proposition 3.1.
  • domain assumption Hahn's unique ergodicity theorem for affine transformations of tori with unipotent linear part
    Used in Proposition 6.3 for unique ergodicity on support components.
  • domain assumption Kronecker's theorem and the Lind-Ward product formula for p-adic absolute values
    Used in Lemma 5.3 to ensure the unstable subspace is nontrivial.
  • domain assumption The bridge theorem of Levit-Vigdorovich / Eckhardt-Shulman equating dense periodic measures with Hilbert-Schmidt stability
    Used in Corollary 1.5 to pass from density to HS-stability.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Density of finitely supported invariant measures for automorphisms of compact abelian groups." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TWGGHIGO

@misc{pith2026250714113,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Density of finitely supported invariant measures for automorphisms of compact abelian groups},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TWGGHIGO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.14113}
}
abstract

We study the structure of invariant measures for continuous automorphisms of compact metrizable abelian groups satisfying the descending chain condition. We show that the finitely supported invariant measures are weak-* dense in the space of all invariant probability measures, and that if the system is ergodic with respect to Haar measure, then the finitely supported ergodic invariant measures are also dense. A key ingredient in the proof is a variant of the specification property, which we establish for the ergodic systems in this class. Our results also yield the following two consequences: first, that every finitely generated group that is a semidirect product of $\mathbb{Z}$ with a countable abelian group $G$ is Hilbert-Schmidt stable; and second, a Livshitz-type theorem characterizing the uniform closure of coboundaries arising from continuous functions in terms of vanishing on periodic orbits. We also construct an example showing that, in general dynamical systems, the property of having dense finitely supported invariant measures does not pass to product systems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Polynomial Hilbert-Schmidt stability of the lamplighter group

    math.GR 2026-07 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10 full

    The lamplighter group has stability radius growth ⪯ r^21 and stability rate ≥ cκ^70, giving the first explicit polynomial Hilbert–Schmidt stability bounds for an infinitely presented group.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Flavio Abdenur, Christian Bonatti, and Sylvain Crovisier, Nonuniform hyperbolicity for C^1 -generic diffeomorphisms , Israel J. Math. 183 (2011), 1--60. 2811152

    work page 2011

  2. [2]

    N. Aoki, M. Dateyama, and M. Komuro, Solenoidal automorphisms with specifications, Monatsh. Math. 93 (1982), no. 2, 79--110. 653100

    work page 1982

  3. [3]

    Nobuo Aoki, Zero-dimensional automorphisms having a dense orbit, J. Math. Soc. Japan 33 (1981), no. 4, 693--700. 630632

    work page 1981

  4. [4]

    Daniel Berend, Multi-invariant sets on compact abelian groups, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 286 (1984), no. 2, 505--535. 760973

    work page 1984

  5. [5]

    Rufus Bowen, Periodic points and measures for A xiom A diffeomorphisms , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 154 (1971), 377--397. 282372

    work page 1971

  6. [6]

    Yves Coudene and Barbara Schapira, Generic measures for hyperbolic flows on non-compact spaces, Israel J. Math. 179 (2010), 157--172. 2735038

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    Masahito Dateyama, The almost weak specification property for ergodic group automorphisms of abelian groups, J. Math. Soc. Japan 42 (1990), no. 2, 341--351. 1041229

    work page 1990

  8. [8]

    D\'iaz, Katrin Gelfert, and Bruno Santiago, Weak * and entropy approximation of nonhyperbolic measures: a geometrical approach , Math

    Lorenzo J. D\'iaz, Katrin Gelfert, and Bruno Santiago, Weak * and entropy approximation of nonhyperbolic measures: a geometrical approach , Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 169 (2020), no. 3, 507--545. 4170615

    work page 2020

Show all 59 references
  1. [9]

    Systems 30 (2010), no

    Rafael de la Llave and Alistair Windsor, Liv sic theorems for non-commutative groups including diffeomorphism groups and results on the existence of conformal structures for A nosov systems , Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 30 (2010), no. 4, 1055--1100. 2669410

    2010

  2. [10]

    Dogon, A

    A. Dogon, A. Levit, and I. Vigdorovich, Characters of diagonal products and hilbert-schmidt stability, arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.11608 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Caleb Eckhardt, Residually finite amenable groups that are not hilbert-schmidt stable, arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.07791 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Systems 42 (2022), no

    Manfred Einsiedler and Elon Lindenstrauss, Rigidity properties for commuting automorphisms on tori and solenoids, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 42 (2022), no. 2, 691--736. 4362906

    2022

  5. [13]

    Caleb Eckhardt and Tatiana Shulman, On amenable H ilbert- S chmidt stable groups , J. Funct. Anal. 285 (2023), no. 3, Paper No. 109954, 31. 4579918

    2023

  6. [14]

    259, Springer-Verlag London, Ltd., London, 2011

    Manfred Einsiedler and Thomas Ward, Ergodic theory with a view towards number theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 259, Springer-Verlag London, Ltd., London, 2011. 2723325

    2011

  7. [15]

    Pytheas Fogg, Substitutions in dynamics, arithmetics and combinatorics, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol

    N. Pytheas Fogg, Substitutions in dynamics, arithmetics and combinatorics, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1794, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2002. 1970385

    2002

  8. [16]

    Systems Theory 1 (1967), 1--49

    Harry Furstenberg, Disjointness in ergodic theory, minimal sets, and a problem in D iophantine approximation , Math. Systems Theory 1 (1967), 1--49. 213508

    1967

  9. [17]

    I. M. Gel 39 fand, M. I. Graev, and I. I. Pyatetskii-Shapiro, Representation theory and automorphic functions, Generalized Functions, vol. 6, Academic Press, Inc., Boston, MA, 1990, Translated from the Russian by K. A. Hirsch, Reprint of the 1969 edition. 1071179

    1990

  10. [18]

    Systems 38 (2018), no

    Katrin Gelfert and Dominik Kwietniak, On density of ergodic measures and generic points, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 38 (2018), no. 5, 1745--1767. 3820000

    2018

  11. [19]

    Lev Glebsky, Almost commuting matrices with respect to normalized hilbert-schmidt norm, 2010

    2010

  12. [20]

    Helge Glockner, Lectures on lie groups over local fields, arXiv preprint arXiv:0804.2234 (2008)

    2008 arXiv

  13. [21]

    F. J. Hahn, On affine transformations of compact abelian groups, Amer. J. Math. 85 (1963), 428--446. 155956

    1963

  14. [22]

    Halmos, On automorphisms of compact groups, Bull

    Paul R. Halmos, On automorphisms of compact groups, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 49 (1943), 619--624. 8647

    1943

  15. [23]

    Hall, Finiteness conditions for soluble groups, Proc

    P. Hall, Finiteness conditions for soluble groups, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 4 (1954), 419--436. 72873

    1954

  16. [24]

    Kenneth Hoffman and Ray Kunze, Linear algebra, second ed., Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1971. 276251

    1971

  17. [25]

    Don Hadwin and Tatiana Shulman, Stability of group relations under small H ilbert- S chmidt perturbations , J. Funct. Anal. 275 (2018), no. 4, 761--792. 3807776

    2018

  18. [26]

    Wojciech Jaworski, Contraction groups, ergodicity, and distal properties of automorphisms of compact groups, Illinois J. Math. 56 (2012), no. 4, 1023--1084. 3231473

    2012

  19. [27]

    30, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2003

    Anatole Katok, Combinatorial constructions in ergodic theory and dynamics, University Lecture Series, vol. 30, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2003. 2008435

    2003

  20. [28]

    Marcin Kulczycki, Dominik Kwietniak, and Piotr Oprocha, On almost specification and average shadowing properties, Fund. Math. 224 (2014), no. 3, 241--278. 3194417

    2014

  21. [29]

    Math., vol

    Dominik Kwietniak, Martha a cka, and Piotr Oprocha, A panorama of specification-like properties and their consequences, Dynamics and numbers, Contemp. Math., vol. 669, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2016, pp. 155--186. 3546668

    2016

  22. [30]

    Systems 9 (1989), no

    Bruce Kitchens and Klaus Schmidt, Automorphisms of compact groups, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 9 (1989), no. 4, 691--735. 1036904

    1989

  23. [31]

    Wayne Lawton, The structure of compact connected groups which admit an expansive automorphism, Recent advances in topological dynamics ( P roc. C onf. T opological D ynamics, Y ale U niv., N ew H aven, C onn., 1972; in honor of G ustav A rnold H edlund), Lecture Notes in Math....

    1972

  24. [32]

    D. A. Lind, The structure of skew products with ergodic group automorphisms, Israel J. Math. 28 (1977), no. 3, 205--248. 460593

    1977

  25. [33]

    , Split skew products, a related functional equation, and specification, Israel J. Math. 30 (1978), no. 3, 236--254. 508267

    1978

  26. [34]

    C onf., M ath

    , Ergodic group automorphisms and specification, Ergodic theory ( P roc. C onf., M ath. F orschungsinst., O berwolfach, 1978), Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 729, Springer, Berlin, 1979, pp. 93--104. 550414

    1978

  27. [35]

    Systems 2 (1982), no

    , Dynamical properties of quasihyperbolic toral automorphisms, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 2 (1982), no. 1, 49--68. 684244

    1982

  28. [36]

    , Ergodic group automorphisms are exponentially recurrent, Israel J. Math. 41 (1982), no. 4, 313--320. 657863

    1982

  29. [37]

    A. N. Liv s ic, Certain properties of the homology of Y -systems , Mat. Zametki 10 (1971), 555--564. 293669

    1971

  30. [38]

    , Cohomology of dynamical systems, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. 36 (1972), 1296--1320. 334287

    1972

  31. [39]

    Systems 42 (2022), no

    Arie Levit and Alexander Lubotzky, Infinitely presented permutation stable groups and invariant random subgroups of metabelian groups, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 42 (2022), no. 6, 2028--2063. 4417344

    2022

  32. [40]

    3, 388--393

    R Robert Laxton and William Parry, On the periodic points of certain automorphisms and a system of polynomial identities, Journal of Algebra 6 (1967), no. 3, 388--393

    1967

  33. [41]

    Arie Levit and Itamar Vigdorovich, Characters of solvable groups, H ilbert- S chmidt stability and dense periodic measures , Math. Ann. 389 (2024), no. 3, 3181--3229. 4753084

    2024

  34. [42]

    D. A. Lind and T. Ward, Automorphisms of solenoids and p -adic entropy , Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 8 (1988), no. 3, 411--419. 961739

    1988

  35. [43]

    Brian Marcus, A note on periodic points for ergodic toral automorphisms, Monatsh. Math. 89 (1980), no. 2, 121--129. 572888

    1980

  36. [44]

    G. A. Margulis, Discrete subgroups of semisimple L ie groups , Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete (3) [Results in Mathematics and Related Areas (3)], vol. 17, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991. 1090825

    1991

  37. [45]

    Miles and R

    G. Miles and R. K. Thomas, The breakdown of automorphisms of compact topological groups, Studies in probability and ergodic theory, Adv. Math. Suppl. Stud., vol. 2, Academic Press, New York-London, 1978, pp. 207--218. 517262

    1978

  38. [46]

    K. R. Parthasarathy, On the category of ergodic measures, Illinois J. Math. 5 (1961), 648--656. 148850

    1961

  39. [47]

    Pestov, Hyperlinear and sofic groups: a brief guide, Bull

    Vladimir G. Pestov, Hyperlinear and sofic groups: a brief guide, Bull. Symbolic Logic 14 (2008), no. 4, 449--480. 2460675

    2008

  40. [48]

    Phelps, Lectures on C hoquet's theorem , second ed., Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol

    Robert R. Phelps, Lectures on C hoquet's theorem , second ed., Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1757, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001. 1835574

    2001

  41. [49]

    Pfister and W

    C.-E. Pfister and W. G. Sullivan, Large deviations estimates for dynamical systems without the specification property. A pplications to the -shifts , Nonlinearity 18 (2005), no. 1, 237--261. 2109476

    2005

  42. [50]

    1294, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2010

    Martine Queff\'elec, Substitution dynamical systems---spectral analysis, second ed., Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1294, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2010. 2590264

    2010

  43. [51]

    Derek J. S. Robinson, A course in the theory of groups, second ed., Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 80, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1996. 1357169

    1996

  44. [52]

    auser Classics, Birkh\

    Klaus Schmidt, Dynamical systems of algebraic origin, Modern Birkh\"auser Classics, Birkh\"auser/Springer Basel AG, Basel, 1995, [2011 reprint of the 1995 original] [MR1345152]. 3024809

    1995

  45. [53]

    Peter Schneider, Nonarchimedean functional analysis, Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2002. 1869547

    2002

  46. [54]

    Nimish A. Shah, Invariant measures and orbit closures on homogeneous spaces for actions of subgroups generated by unipotent elements, Lie groups and ergodic theory ( M umbai, 1996), Tata Inst. Fund. Res. Stud. Math., vol. 14, Tata Inst. Fund. Res., Bombay, 1998, pp. 229--271. 1699367

    1996

  47. [55]

    Karl Sigmund, Generic properties of invariant measures for A xiom A \ diffeomorphisms , Invent. Math. 11 (1970), 99--109. 286135

    1970

  48. [56]

    Veech, Periodic points and invariant pseudomeasures for toral endomorphisms, Ergodic Theory Dynam

    William A. Veech, Periodic points and invariant pseudomeasures for toral endomorphisms, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 6 (1986), no. 3, 449--473. 863205

    1986

  49. [57]

    79, Springer-Verlag, New York-Berlin, 1982

    Peter Walters, An introduction to ergodic theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 79, Springer-Verlag, New York-Berlin, 1982. 648108

    1982

  50. [58]

    Band 144, Springer-Verlag, New York-Berlin, 1974

    Andr\'e Weil, Basic number theory, third ed., Die Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol. Band 144, Springer-Verlag, New York-Berlin, 1974. 427267

    1974

  51. [59]

    7, 1942--1972

    Xinxing Wu, Piotr Oprocha, and Guanrong Chen, On various definitions of shadowing with average error in tracing, Nonlinearity 29 (2016), no. 7, 1942--1972. 3521635

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.