Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 25 references

Feasibility of Energy Neutral Wildlife Tracking using Multi-Source Energy Harvesting

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that a wildlife tracking tag combining solar and kinetic energy harvesting, supercapacitor storage, and energy-aware scheduling can stay energy-neutral while taking GPS fixes every two minutes and transmitting over…

desk verdict A transparent simulation-based feasibility study whose headline 2-minute GPS claim rests on an unverified wolf kinetic-yield input that needs checking before the numbers are quoted. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.14234 v1 pith:QM2ZULOL submitted 2025-07-17 cs.NI

Samer Nasser , Henrique Duarte Moura , Dragan Subotic , Ritesh Kumar Singh , Maarten Weyn , Jeroen Famaey This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.NI
keywords energyharvestingenergy-neutralIoTwildlifetrackingsupercapacitorenergy-awareschedulingNB-Iokineticsolar
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Long-term animal tracking is limited by tag batteries, which are hard to replace in the wild. This paper argues that a tag harvesting both solar energy and kinetic motion energy can run indefinitely on a supercapacitor without battery swaps, and that an energy-aware scheduler can keep it alive through a worst-case winter. In simulation over 13 days of Antwerp winter weather, a 2.5 F supercapacitor never falls below the minimum operating voltage while the tag takes a GPS fix and a motion reading every two minutes and transmits the batch over NB-IoT every hour. A sympathetic reading is that the paper establishes a feasible component-level design point for maintenance-free, multi-source wildlife tracking, not a field-tested device.

What carries the argument

The argument rests on a discrete-time capacitor model (Equation 1) that updates the supercapacitor voltage from the harvested current, the equivalent load resistance, the capacitance, and the time step; on an energy-aware scheduler (Algorithm 1) that only permits GPS or NB-IoT tasks when the measured voltage clears task-specific thresholds, with cold start reserved for full restarts; and on component-level energy characterizations derived from datasheets and direct measurements. A kinetic pendulum harvester feeds a PMIC whose lossless Coulomb counter samples the harvested current, and because that current tracks movement intensity, the same component doubles as an activity sensor. The solar path uses a 40x40 mm panel with a stated efficiency, an assumed cosine-loss factor, and a PMIC efficiency figure, while the kinetic path is built from a wolf daily energy estimate distributed across a diurnal activity curve.

What would settle it

Instrument a free-ranging or captive wolf with a tag using the modeled solar panel, kinetic harvester, 2.5 F supercapacitor, and scheduler, and record the capacitor voltage across several consecutive winter nights; if the voltage crosses below 1.8 V on any night with the assumed irradiance, the central energy-neutrality claim is false. A quicker proxy is to measure the kinetic harvester's average daily energy yield in joules for the actual target species and check whether it approaches 13.07 J rather than the 0.69–3.2 J range reported for ponies and dogs.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that combining solar and kinetic energy harvesting with a supercapacitor and an energy-aware task scheduler keeps a wildlife tracker energy-neutral at a practically useful sampling rate. For a 2.5 F capacitor and a 2-minute GPS interval, the simulated capacitor voltage stays above the 1.8 V cutoff for the full 13-day winter dataset, while the system records GPS fixes and Coulomb counter readings every two minutes and transmits the accumulated data hourly over NB-IoT. The comparison runs show a clear trade-off: 2-minute fixes deliver 2.6 times more GPS measurements per day than 5-minute fixes with no loss of reliability, whereas 1-minute fixes cause warm-start fallbacks, a cold start, and a shutdown gap that creates multi-hour data holes. Both the 2.5 F and 5 F capacitors are workable, while the 1 F capacitor depletes too easily, and the 5 F capacitor fails to fully recharge on one low-sun day.

Load-bearing premise

The system's overnight survival rests on the assumed kinetic energy yield for wolves, an average of 13.07 J per day whose provenance is not fully documented in the paper; if real wolves yield closer to the 0.69–3.2 J/day measured in dog and pony trials, the capacitor would drop below the 1.8 V cutoff at night and the two-minute fix schedule would fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • With the modeled components, a 2-minute GPS interval plus hourly NB-IoT transmission runs energy-neutral through the 13-day winter scenario on a 2.5 F or 5 F supercapacitor.
  • Dropping the GPS interval from 5 to 2 minutes raises daily fix counts by a factor of 2.6 with no warm starts, cold starts, or shutdown gaps.
  • Pushing the interval to 1 minute destabilizes the system: warm-start ephemeris downloads occur, a cold start is triggered, and a shutdown produces data gaps of multiple hours.
  • A 1 F supercapacitor is too small for reliable 2-minute fixes, while a 5 F capacitor is viable but stays short of full recharge on low-sun days, so the middle size is the practical choice.
  • The kinetic harvester's Coulomb counter readings provide a movement-intensity proxy at negligible extra energy cost, adding a behavior channel without dedicated sensors.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • In the editor's reading, the wolf kinetic yield of 13.07 J/day is the least-supported input; a sensitivity sweep from 0.69 to 13.07 J/day would show at what yield the 2-minute schedule breaks, and that sweep is feasible without hardware.
  • The design assumes NB-IoT coverage and a specific winter location, so the energy budget would need revalidation for other latitudes, seasons, or communication backhauls; the scheduling framework itself is portable.
  • The activity proxy could support adaptive duty cycling, skipping GPS fixes during detected rest periods, which the paper lists as future work but does not simulate.
  • The modular architecture could accept a third harvesting source such as thermal energy to close the overnight gap for less active species than wolves.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents a simulation framework for a wildlife tracking tag that harvests energy from solar and kinetic sources, stores it in a supercapacitor, and uses an energy-aware scheduler to perform GPS fixes and NB-IoT transmissions. The system is evaluated over a 13-day winter irradiance dataset from Antwerp, Belgium, with three GPS fix intervals (1, 2, 5 minutes) and three capacitor sizes (1 F, 2.5 F, 5 F). The central result is that a 2.5 F capacitor supports consistent every-two-minute GPS fixes and hourly NB-IoT transmissions without dropping below the operating voltage Vmin across the entire dataset. The kinetic harvester is also proposed as a motion proxy by sampling its harvested current.

Significance. If the results are correct, the paper offers a useful component-level simulation model for energy-harvesting wildlife tags and identifies a plausible capacitor size and operating configuration for solar-plus-kinetic energy neutrality. The dual use of the kinetic harvester as an activity sensor is an interesting design idea that could reduce tag complexity. The simulation is internally consistent and the threshold-based scheduler is clearly described. However, the paper is simulation-only, relies on an unverified kinetic energy input for wolves, and claims a comparison against single-source systems that is not actually performed. These issues currently temper the strength of the feasibility claim.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Section 5] The abstract states that the approach 'significantly increas[es] data yield and reliability compared to single-source systems,' but Section 5 reports results only for the proposed multi-source system with different fix intervals and capacitor sizes. No single-source baseline (solar-only or kinetic-only) is simulated or tabulated. Either add such a comparison or revise the abstract and Section 5.2 to clearly limit the claim to the multi-source configuration.
  2. [Section 4.2] The wolf-specific average daily kinetic harvest of 13.07 J is attributed to Gregersen et al. [5], yet Section 1 describes [5] as reporting 2.26–3.2 J/day for dogs and 0.69 J/day for an Exmoor pony, with no wolf figure. This value is load-bearing because nighttime operation depends almost entirely on the kinetic harvester (as seen in Figure 5), and the 2.5 F configuration has a thin voltage margin. The authors should provide a direct source for the 13.07 J value and, more importantly, add a sensitivity analysis over a plausible range (e.g., 0.69–3.2 J/day) to show under which conditions the every-two-minute fix claim would fail.
  3. [Section 4.2 and Reference [11]] The solar irradiance dataset is described as 'private' and is cited to [11], but the title of [11] ('Harvesting energy from soil-air temperature differences for batteryless iot devices: A case study') does not match the described content of solar irradiance measurements in Antwerp. This citation mismatch, together with the private status of the dataset, makes the daytime energy input difficult to verify. The authors should either make the dataset available (or deposit it in a repository), provide summary statistics such as daily insolation values, and correct the citation or clarify the origin of the solar data.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 5.2.3, Table 4] The average number of fixes per day for the 2-minute interval is reported as 700.00, which is 20 fixes per day short of the theoretical 720 (24 h × 60 min / 2 min). The paper says the daily fix count has 'negligible standard deviation' and reflects reliable scheduling, but the shortfall is not explained. A brief note on why some fixes are skipped (e.g., start-up transients, capacitor recharge delays) would be helpful.
  2. [Section 4.1, Eq. (1)] The notation '𝑉t+1' and '𝑉t' is ambiguous in print; using explicit subscripts (e.g., V_{t+1}, V_t) and a single symbol list near Eq. (1) would improve readability.
  3. [Section 3.5, Table 2] The column headers 'MCUActiveBase' and 'GPSBackupCurrent' are somewhat cryptic; expanding them to 'MCU active base current' and 'GPS hardware backup current' in the table caption would make the table self-explanatory.
  4. [Section 5.2.1, Figure 4] The three curves for different GPS fix intervals may be difficult to distinguish in grayscale; using different line styles or adding markers in the legend would aid readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the energy-neutral 2-minute GPS claim is a forward simulation result from independent external inputs, not a fitted or self-referential prediction.

full rationale

The claimed result is produced by a forward component-level simulation (Algorithm 1 and Equation 1) whose inputs are independently specified: GPS and NB-IoT energy consumptions from datasheets and direct measurements (Tables 1 and 2), a measured winter solar-irradiance dataset [11], a wolf kinetic-energy estimate of 13.07 J/day with a diurnal activity profile from external studies [5, 18], and a standard RC capacitor model [13]. None of these inputs is fitted to the simulation's success criterion (capacitor voltage staying above V_min), and the 2-minute GPS target is a configuration setting, not a parameter inferred from the outcome. The self-citations [10], [11], and [13] refer to published hardware, a measured dataset, and a standard circuit equation respectively; they carry independent evidence and do not embed the conclusion that the 2.5 F capacitor suffices. The wolf kinetic-yield value is an external parameter that the introduction's own cited dog/pony trials suggest may deserve verification, but that is a correctness or sensitivity risk, not circularity: lowering that input in the same model would simply predict a shutdown, which shows the prediction is not forced by construction. Therefore no derivation step reduces to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The simulation rests on external component measurements, a private winter solar dataset, a kinetic yield estimate for wolves, and prior work from the same group for the combiner and the capacitor model. The most fragile items are the unattributed wolf kinetic figure and the possibly misattributed solar dataset; these are inputs, not outputs of the simulation.

free parameters (2)
  • Static cosine loss factor = 0.5
    Chosen as a conservative approximation for the solar angle of incidence (60 degrees from vertical) in Section 4.2; directly scales the solar harvesting current.
  • Scheduler voltage thresholds = Vthresh_HS=1.9 V, Vthresh_HE=2.0 V, Vthresh_WE=2.1 V, Vthresh_NBIoT=2.0 V
    Table 3; described as experimentally determined but not optimized; these thresholds gate whether GPS and NB-IoT tasks execute and therefore shape the energy-neutral outcome.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The kinetic harvester yields an average of 13.07 J/day for wolves with a diurnal profile from Theuerkauf et al.
    Section 4.2; the citation given for the 13.07 J figure (Gregersen et al. [5]) is described in the introduction as dog and pony trials, so the wolf-specific figure is not clearly sourced.
  • domain assumption The solar irradiance dataset (Antwerp, Nov 24 to Dec 7 2023) is representative of worst-case winter conditions and is correctly attributed.
    Section 4.2; the dataset is private and the cited reference [11] is about soil-air temperature harvesting, not solar irradiance.
  • domain assumption The capacitor follows ideal RC dynamics with constant leakage current as in Eq. 1.
    Section 4.1; ignores voltage and temperature dependence of supercapacitor leakage.
  • domain assumption Component energy consumptions from datasheets and measurements are accurate.
    Section 3; e.g., GPS from SAM-M10Q and FireFlyX1, NB-IoT from nRF9160 measurements.
  • domain assumption The multi-source combiner has 88% efficiency.
    Section 4.2, from [10], prior work by the same group.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Feasibility of Energy Neutral Wildlife Tracking using Multi-Source Energy Harvesting." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QM2ZULOL

@misc{pith2026250714234,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Feasibility of Energy Neutral Wildlife Tracking using Multi-Source Energy Harvesting},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QM2ZULOL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.14234}
}
read the original abstract

Long-term wildlife tracking is crucial for biodiversity monitoring, but energy limitations pose challenges, especially for animal tags, where replacing batteries is impractical and stressful for the animal due to the need to locate, possibly sedate, and handle it. Energy harvesting offers a sustainable alternative, yet most existing systems rely on a single energy source and infrastructure-limited communication technologies. This paper presents an energy-neutral system that combines solar and kinetic energy harvesting to enable the tracking and monitoring of wild animals. Harvesting from multiple sources increases the total available energy. Uniquely, the kinetic harvester also serves as a motion proxy by sampling harvested current, enabling activity monitoring without dedicated sensors. Our approach also ensures compatibility with existing cellular infrastructure, using Narrowband Internet of Things (NB-IoT). We present a simulation framework that models energy harvesting, storage, and consumption at the component level. An energy-aware scheduler coordinates task execution based on real-time energy availability. We evaluate performance under realistically varying conditions, comparing task frequencies and capacitor sizes. Results show that our approach maintains energy-neutral operation while significantly increasing data yield and reliability compared to single-source systems, with the ability to consistently sample GPS location data and kinetic harvesting data every two minutes while transmitting these results over NB-IoT every hour. These findings demonstrate the potential for maintenance-free, environmentally friendly tracking in remote habitats, enabling more effective and scalable wildlife monitoring.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.14234 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overview of the system architecture of the proposed energy-neutral wildlife tracker. Ambient energy from solar and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Flowchart of the integrated system behavior, start [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Electrical model of the system architecture with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Full simulation overview of the combined harvest [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Close-up analysis of the simulation (day 12 - 13) for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Full simulation overview of the combined harvest [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

25 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages

  1. [5]

    Wild, Linnea Worsøe Havmøller, Peter Rask Møller, Torben Anker Lenau, Martin Wikelski, and Rasmus Worsøe Havmøller

    Troels Gregersen, Timm A. Wild, Linnea Worsøe Havmøller, Peter Rask Møller, Torben Anker Lenau, Martin Wikelski, and Rasmus Worsøe Havmøller. 2023. A novel kinetic energy harvesting system for lifetime deployments of wildlife trackers. PLOS ONE 18, 5 (May 2023), e0285930. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0285930

    doi:10.1371/journal 2023

  2. [11]

    Priyesh Pappinisseri Puluckul and Maarten Weyn. 2024. Harvesting energy from soil-air temperature differences for batteryless iot devices: A case study. IEEE Access (2024)

    work page 2024

  3. [1]

    Eiko Bäumker, Luca Conrad, Laura Maria Comella, and Peter Woias. 2021. A Fully Featured Thermal Energy Harvesting Tracker for Wildlife. Energies 14, 19 (2021), 6363. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14196363 Accessed: 2025-04-29

    work page doi:10.3390/en14196363 2021

  4. [2]

    Alghamdi, Yanfeng Zhu, and Jean Wan Hong Yong

    Fu Chen, Feifei Jiang, Jing Ma, Mohammed A. Alghamdi, Yanfeng Zhu, and Jean Wan Hong Yong. 2024. Intersecting planetary health: Exploring the impacts of environmental stressors on wildlife and human health. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 283 (2024), 116848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024. 116848

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024 2024

  5. [3]

    Cornell Dubilier Electronics. 2024. DGH Series Supercapacitor Datasheet . Datasheet. Cornell Dubilier Electronics. https://www.cde.com/resources/ catalogs/DGH.pdf Accessed: 2025-04-29

    work page 2024

  6. [4]

    GlobalTop Technology Inc. 2015. FireFly X1 GNSS Module Datasheet (Tape Reel) . Datasheet Gmm-3301. GlobalTop Technology Inc., Tainan, Taiwan. http:// mikrotar.pl/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/GlobalTop-FireFly-X1.pdf Accessed: 2025-05-02

    work page 2015

  7. [6]

    Sivakumar, P

    Bilal Habib, Shyam Shrotriya, K. Sivakumar, P. R. Sinha, and V. B. Mathur. 2014. Three decades of wildlife radio telemetry in India: A review.Animal Biotelemetry 2, 1 (2014), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/2050-3385-2-4

    work page doi:10.1186/2050-3385-2-4 2014

  8. [7]

    Keysight Technologies. 2025. N6705B DC Power Analyzer, Modular, 600 W, 4 Slots. Keysight Technologies, Santa Rosa, CA, USA. https://www.keysight.com/us/ en/product/N6705B/dc-power-analyzer-modular-600-w-4-slots.html Accessed: 2025-05-13

    work page 2025

Show all 25 references
  1. [8]

    Kinetron. 2025. MECHANICAL GENERATOR SYSTEMS. Kinetron. https://www. kinetron.eu/technology/mechanical Accessed: 2025-05-02

    2025

  2. [9]

    Nordic Semiconductor. 2024. nRF9160 Product Specification v2.2 . Nordic Semi- conductor. https://docs-be.nordicsemi.com/bundle/ps_nrf9160/page/nRF9160_ PS_v2.2.pdf Revision 2.2, May 24, 2024

    2024

  3. [10]

    Priyesh Pappinisseri Puluckul and Maarten Weyn. 2023. InfiniteEn: A Multi- Source Energy Harvesting System with Load Monitoring Module for Batteryless Internet of Things. 2023 IEEE World Forum on Internet of Things: The Blue Planet: A Marriage of Sea and Space, WF-IoT 2023 0, ...

    2023

  4. [12]

    Feng Qian, Mingyi Liu, Jianuo Huang, Jiajun Zhang, Hyunjun Jung, Zhiqun Daniel Deng, Muhammad R Hajj, and Lei Zuo. 2022. Bio-inspired bistable piezoelectric energy harvester for powering animal telemetry tags: Conceptual design and preliminary experimental validation. Renewabl...

    2022

  5. [13]

    Adnan Sabovic, Carmen Delgado, Dragan Subotic, Bart Jooris, Eli De Poorter, and Jeroen Famaey. 2020. Energy-Aware Sensing on Battery-Less LoRaWANDe- vices with Energy Harvesting. MDPI 9, 6 (2020), 904. https://doi.org/10.3390/ electronics9060904

    2020

  6. [14]

    Michael W Shafer and Eric Morgan. 2014. Energy harvesting for marine-wildlife monitoring. In Smart Materials, Adaptive Structures and Intelligent Systems , Vol. 46155. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, ASME, Newport, Rhode Island, USA, V002T07A017. https://doi.org/10.1...

    2014 doi

  7. [15]

    Silicon Laboratories. 2020. EFP01 Energy Friendly PMIC Datasheet. Datasheet Rev. 1.1. Silicon Labs. https://www.silabs.com/documents/public/data-sheets/efp01- datasheet.pdf Accessed: 2025-04-29

    2020

  8. [16]

    STMicroelectronics. 2024. STM32L496xx Ultra-low-power Arm® Cortex®-M4 32- bit MCU+FPU, 100 DMIPS, up to 1 MB flash, 320 KB SRAM, USB OTG FS, audio, HASH, external SMPS. STMicroelectronics. https://www.st.com/resource/en/ datasheet/stm32l496ae.pdf Datasheet, Revision 19

    2024

  9. [17]

    Texas Instruments. 2013. User’s Guide for bq25570 Battery Charger Evaluation Module for Energy Harvesting . Texas Instruments. https://www.ti.com/lit/ug/ sluuaa7a/sluuaa7a.pdf Revised August 2014

    2013

  10. [18]

    Jörn Theuerkauf, Włodzimierz Jędrzejewski, Krzysztof Schmidt, Henryk Okarma, Ireneusz Ruczyński, Stanisław Śnieżko, and Roman Gula. 2003. Daily Patterns and Duration of Wolf Activity in the Białowieża Forest, Poland. Journal of Mammalogy 84, 1 (2003), 243–253. https://doi.org/...

    2003 doi

  11. [19]

    M. A. Tucker, K. Böhning-Gaese, W. F. Fagan, J. M. Fryxell, B. Van Moorter, S. C. Alberts, et al. 2018. Moving in the Anthropocene: Global Reductions in Terrestrial Mammalian Movements. Science 359, 6374 (2018), 466–469. https: //doi.org/10.1126/science.aam9712

    2018 doi

  12. [20]

    u-blox AG. 2023. SAM-M10Q Integration Manual: Standard Precision GNSS An- tenna Module. u-blox AG, Thalwil, Switzerland. https://content.u-blox.com/sites/ default/files/documents/SAM-M10Q_IntegrationManual_UBX-22020019.pdf Document No. UBX-22020019 - R02

    2023

  13. [21]

    u-blox AG. 2024. SAM-M10Q: u-blox M10 Standard Precision GNSS Antenna Module. u-blox AG. https://content.u-blox.com/sites/default/files/documents/ SAM-M10Q_DataSheet_UBX-22013293.pdf Datasheet, Revision 05

    2024

  14. [22]

    Department of Defense

    U.S. Department of Defense. 2021. Navstar GPS Space Segment/Navigation User Interfaces. Technical Report IS-GPS-200M. U.S. Department of Defense. https: //www.gps.gov/technical/icwg/IS-GPS-200M.pdf Revision M

    2021

  15. [23]

    Azdiana Md Yusop, Syahidan Arshad Ahmad Yusry, Noor Asyikin Sulaiman, Khairun Nisa Khamil, and Ahmad Sadhiqin Mohd Isira. 2022. Solar Energy Harvester For Pet GPS Collar. Przeglad Elektrotechniczny 98, 8 (2022), 47–51

    2022

  16. [24]

    Hexiang Zhang, Xiaoping Wu, Yajia Pan, Ali Azam, and Zutao Zhang. 2021. A novel vibration energy harvester based on eccentric semicircular rotor for self- powered applications in wildlife monitoring.Energy Conversion and Management 247 (2021), 114674

    2021

  17. [25]

    Bhatt, Gavin E

    Yanyan Zhao, Oliver Pohl, Anand I. Bhatt, Gavin E. Collis, Peter J. Mahon, Thomas Rüther, and Anthony F. Hollenkamp. 2021. A Review on Battery Market Trends, Second-Life Reuse, and Recycling. Sustainable Chemistry 2, 1 (2021), 167–205. https://doi.org/10.3390/suschem2010011

    2021 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.