Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 71 references

An Integral Field Spectroscopy Study Of Thin And Thick Discs In IC 2531

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read IC 2531's geometrically thick disc is older and more metal-poor than its thin disc, with similar alpha enhancement, matching the Milky Way's chemical thick disc pattern.

desk verdict Careful single-galaxy IFU study whose Milky-Way-similarity claim rests on a warp interpretation; deserves review with softened wording. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.14989 v1 pith:6OAJRMG6 submitted 2025-07-20 astro-ph.GA

Fan Xu , K. C. Freeman , Henry Zovaro This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords IC2531thindiscthickstellarpopulationsintegralfieldspectroscopyppxfgalacticwarpMilkyWayanalogue
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper uses integral field spectroscopy of the edge-on Milky Way analogue IC 2531 to test how typical the Milky Way's thin and thick disc properties are. Fitting stellar population models to spatially binned spectra, the authors find that IC 2531's geometrical thick disc is on average older and more metal-poor than its thin disc, with similar alpha enhancement, matching the Milky Way's chemical thick disc pattern. One thick-disc bin is clearly alpha-rich, close to the most alpha-enhanced Milky Way thick disc stars. The paper also identifies a likely warped thin disc region masquerading as a thick disc, warning that edge-on galaxies can hide such warps along the line of sight. If correct, these results strengthen the case that the Milky Way is not atypical among large spiral galaxies.

What carries the argument

The analysis rests on ppxf, a spectral fitting code that finds the best-fitting linear combination of stellar templates while simultaneously fitting stellar kinematics and ionised gas emission lines, applied to Vazdekis stellar population models built from an empirical stellar library. The models span 28 ages (0.5-14 Gyr), 12 metallicities ([M/H] from -2.27 to 0.4), and two [α/Fe] values (0 and 0.4), giving mass-weighted stellar population parameters per spatial bin. The spatial binning follows the galaxy's M-shaped vertical light profile and dust lane; because the observed profiles show no thin/thick disc inflection, the four high-altitude bins are classified as thick disc using published scale heights, and the warp hypothesis for AT1 is the key interpretive step that reconciles its thin-disc-like chemistry with its location at high altitude.

What would settle it

Deep photometry reaching below the current surface brightness limit that resolves the expected thin/thick disc inflection at about 15 arcsec, or high-resolution Hi mapping showing a line-of-sight warp tilt exceeding the assumed 4 degrees, would settle whether AT1 and BT1 trace a true thick disc; if a warp model removes AT1's young, metal-rich, alpha-poor signature, the claimed thick-disc averages would shift.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that IC 2531, a nearly perfectly edge-on Sc galaxy, hosts thin and thick discs whose stellar populations mirror the Milky Way's chemical thin and thick discs: the thick disc is older (>9 Gyr) and more metal-poor ([M/H] < -0.25) than the thin disc, while its alpha enhancement ([α/Fe] ≈ 0.15-0.3) is similar to the thin disc's, with one thick-disc bin (BT2) clearly alpha-rich at [α/Fe] = 0.31. The paper further claims that one geometrically thick disc bin, AT1, is actually a warped or corrugated thin disc crossing the line of sight, identifiable by its young (≈4 Gyr), metal-rich (0.37), alpha-poor (0.03) population and its large velocity dispersion. This warp interpretation is supported by prior Hi observations and by the authors' own kinematic and population comparisons, and it explains why the four thick-disc bins are not chemically uniform.

Load-bearing premise

The four high-altitude bins used to define the thick disc are assumed to trace the geometric thick disc, but the paper's own vertical light profiles show no inflection point and one bin (AT1) is argued to be a warped thin disc; if the warp extends further, the thick-disc population averages could change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the thick disc of IC 2531 is truly older, more metal-poor, and similarly alpha-enhanced relative to its thin disc, then the Milky Way's chemical disc pattern is not unique to our galaxy.
  • A clearly alpha-rich thick disc bin (BT2, [α/Fe] = 0.31) implies that an alpha-enhanced thick disc population exists in IC 2531 too, supporting a fast, early enrichment phase for at least part of the thick disc.
  • The negative radial [M/H] gradient of about -0.046 dex/kpc in IC 2531's thin disc, close to the Milky Way's -0.06 dex/kpc, suggests similar radial mixing or enrichment histories.
  • If the chemical thick disc extends radially beyond the thin disc and dust, as inferred from alpha-enhanced dust-lane bins, IC 2531's thick disc spatial distribution differs from the Milky Way's, which would constrain thick disc formation models.
  • The identification of a warped thin disc at a projected thick disc position implies that edge-on galaxy studies need Hi warp checks before assigning high-altitude light to a thick disc.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct testable extension: apply the same geometric binning and spectral fitting to a larger sample of edge-on analogues, comparing the fraction with Milky-Way-like thick disc chemistry to predictions of different formation models.
  • If the warp in IC 2531 is as extensive as proposed, previous single-slit or low-SNR studies of edge-on galaxies lacking Hi data may have systematically blended warped thin disc light into their thick disc measurements.
  • The alpha-enhanced horizontal feature at y≈17 suggests the chemical thick disc wraps around the thin disc; a prediction is that face-on analogues would show alpha-enhanced stars at large radii near the plane, unlike the Milky Way.
  • Because the paper's thick disc averages rely on only four bins, one of which is likely contaminated, higher-SNR IFU data resolving more vertical bins above the dust plane would strengthen or weaken the claimed similarity to the Milky Way.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper presents WiFeS integral-field spectroscopy of two fields in the nearly edge-on Sc galaxy IC 2531, spatially binned into thin-disc, dust-lane, and thick-disc regions. The authors fit the spectra with ppxf using Vazdekis/MILES templates and derive stellar kinematics plus mass-weighted lg(age), [M/H], and [α/Fe] for each bin, including four bins (AT1, AT2, BT1, BT2) assigned to the geometrical thick disc. They report that IC 2531's thick disc is on average older and more metal-poor than its thin disc but similarly alpha-enhanced, that one thick-disc bin (BT2) is clearly alpha-rich, and that AT1 has thin-disc-like stellar populations and is interpreted as a warped thin disc. The paper also derives a radial [M/H] gradient in the thin disc and discusses line-of-sight projection and dust effects on the kinematics.

Significance. If the result holds, the paper adds a carefully processed stellar-population measurement for an understudied Milky Way analogue and contributes to the small sample of external galaxies with IFS-based thin/thick-disc comparisons. The study has identifiable strengths: Monte Carlo uncertainty estimates, an empirical scatter check via the thin-disc radial metallicity gradient, a bulge-contamination check in Appendix B, and an unusually transparent discussion of the anomalous bin AT1 and its possible warp interpretation. However, the central Milky-Way-similarity claim is only as strong as the geometric decomposition, and the decomposition is not independently verified in this paper; the conclusion therefore needs substantial additional support before it can be regarded as robust.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2.4 and Section 2.5] The assignment of AT1, AT2, BT1, and BT2 as thick-disc bins is load-bearing, but the observed vertical light profiles in Figure 4 show a single exponential with no inflection point, and the apparent scale heights (4.6–6.1 arcsec) are between the expected thin- and thick-disc values. The paper gives no quantitative estimate of the thin-disc light fraction at the mean heights of these bins (|z| ≈ 13–15 arcsec in Tables A1/A2), even though the adopted Mosenkov et al. (2016) model contains the parameters needed for such an estimate. Please add a quantitative contamination estimate from the two-component model and show how the derived population averages change if a plausible thin-disc light fraction is removed.
  2. [Table 2 and Abstract] The pos A 'total thick' row in Table 2 (lg(age) = 0.64 ± 0.14, [M/H] = +0.14 ± 0.13) is not older or more metal-poor than the pos A thin-disc row (lg(age) = 0.82 ± 0.06, [M/H] = −0.10 ± 0.05) because it includes AT1. The abstract's statement that the thick disc is 'on average older, more metal-poor' is therefore true only after the post hoc exclusion of AT1. Please present the combined averages both with and without AT1 (and ideally also without BT1), and revise the abstract and summary to state explicitly that the conclusion depends on this exclusion.
  3. [Section 3.3 and Section 3.2.3] After removing AT1 as a warped thin disc and acknowledging that BT1 may be similarly affected, the robust thick-disc sample reduces to AT2 and BT2, two bins on opposite sides of the galaxy. The claim that the thick disc is 'similarly alpha-enhanced in general' rests on AT2 ([α/Fe] = 0.16) and BT1 ([α/Fe] = 0.15), while BT2 is clearly alpha-rich ([α/Fe] = 0.31); the BT1-test shows a large change in [α/Fe] (0.15 to 0.23) and [M/H] (−0.38 to −0.13) when the top four pixel rows are removed. Please provide either a quantitative warp-contamination model or a clear statement of the results restricted to the two secure bins, and discuss how the reduced sample size affects the generic Milky-Way comparison.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Throughout] The version under review has many missing spaces between words (for example in the Introduction and Section 2.2); the final journal version should be recompiled so that the text is readable.
  2. [Figure 11] The caption of Figure 11 says the errors are ppxf errors, while the text and Tables A1/A2 quote Monte Carlo uncertainties for stellar population parameters; please clarify which error type is plotted in each of Figures 11, 17, 19, and 21.
  3. [Section 3.2] The empirical uncertainty estimate is derived from thin-disc bins only; a sentence explaining why the same uncertainty magnitude is assumed to apply to the fainter thick-disc bins would strengthen the discussion.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No derivation-chain circularity; only a mild post hoc reclassification of the one bin that contradicts the thick-disc claim.

  1. other [Section 3.2 (Table 2) and Section 3.3.1]
    "With the exception of bin AT1, on average, the thick disc bins in IC 2531 appear older, more metal-poor and have a similarly enhanced [α/Fe] compared to the thin disc bins. ... Bin AT1 has unexpected properties. Although its position in projection appears to be a thick disc region, it has all the characteristics of a thin disc's stellar population: young (3.9 Gyr), metal-rich (0.37), and alpha-poor (0.03)."

    The central 'older, more metal-poor' conclusion is produced by excluding AT1, the only bin that violates it. Table 2's pos A 'total thick' row, which includes AT1, has lg(age)=0.64 and [M/H]=0.14, i.e. younger and more metal-rich than the thin-disc row (0.82, -0.10). The exclusion is motivated in part by AT1's already-measured thin-disc-like chemistry, so the confirmation is partly selected by the property being tested. The circularity is only partial: the geometric definition of thick discs, kinematic evidence (AT1 lies on the rotation curve, has no lag), and external HI warp detections independently support the warp reclassification.

full rationale

The paper has no first-principles derivation: it measures stellar populations with ppxf/Vazdekis templates and compares them with independent Milky Way literature. The thick-disc bins are defined geometrically from published scale heights, not from the target chemistry, so the age and metallicity measurements are not self-definitional. The only mild circularity is the post hoc treatment of AT1: the one geometrically selected thick-disc bin with young, metal-rich, alpha-poor properties is reclassified as a warped thin disc, and then the abstract's 'on average older, more metal-poor' claim is stated for the remaining bins. Because the paper explicitly reports the AT1-inclusive total (Table 2) and gives independent kinematic and external-warp support for the reclassification, the concern is a selection and robustness issue rather than a forced reduction. Self-citations (Freeman-coauthored Kregel et al. 2004, Wainscoat et al. 1989, etc.) are used only as ordinary observational references, not as uniqueness theorems or ansatz justifications. Overall circularity is minimal.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central population results depend on adopted distance, manual binning, a coarse alpha grid, and an assumed geometric identification of the thick disc. The warp entity is introduced post hoc to explain one discrepant bin and lacks direct independent confirmation.

free parameters (5)
  • Adopted distance = 32 Mpc (range 27 to 37 Mpc from Tully-Fisher)
    All physical sizes, scale heights, radii, and metallicity gradients depend on this adopted distance; its uncertainty is not propagated into the presented final uncertainties.
  • Spatial bin boundaries and SNR threshold = SNR > 20
    Bin shapes and sizes were adjusted by hand to follow galaxy morphology and reach SNR > 20 (Section 2.5). This choice affects which spectra are combined and the resulting population parameters.
  • Template alpha grid = [alpha/Fe] = 0 and 0.4 only
    The Vazdekis models provide only two alpha values; fitted alpha-enhancement is restricted to this grid, which can bias intermediate values (Section 2.6).
  • Systemic velocity = 2443 km/s
    Obtained from a simple linear fit to the (position, velocity) data to convert measured velocities to rotational velocities (Section 3.1.1); uncertainty not propagated.
  • Top-four-pixel row exclusion in test bins = AT1-test and BT1-test
    A second set of thick disc bins was created after seeing the results, excluding the top four pixel rows (Section 3.3.1). This post hoc choice changes [M/H] and [alpha/Fe] in BT1.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Vazdekis/MILES synthetic spectra with a Kroupa IMF accurately represent the stellar populations of IC 2531.
    Used as templates for ppxf fitting (Section 2.6); systematic errors from template mismatch are not quantified.
  • standard math ppxf mass-weighted mean population parameters are unbiased estimates of the true light-weighted stellar population.
    The fitting code (Cappellari 2017) assumes a linear combination of templates; degeneracies between age, metallicity and alpha are addressed only by Monte Carlo noise tests, not by external validation.
  • domain assumption Dust optical depth decreases with height above the plane, so higher-z spectra probe deeper into the galaxy.
    Used throughout Sections 3.1 and 3.2 to interpret radial trends; the paper states this is an assumption in Section 3.1.
  • ad hoc to paper The four high-z bins are dominated by the geometrically defined thick disc, not by the bulge or a warped thin disc.
    Sections 2.4 and 2.5. The authors check bulge contamination (Appendix B), but the AT1 warp hypothesis shows the classification is not secure for all bins.
  • domain assumption Line-of-sight projection in an edge-on galaxy can be interpreted through comparison with H I tangent-point velocities.
    Used to infer line-of-sight depths and the warp; Section 3.1.3 and Figure 13.
invented entities (1)
  • Warped or corrugated thin disc crossing the line of sight in the northern half of pos A (and possibly pos B)
    purpose: Explains the unexpected young, metal-rich, alpha-poor stellar population in 'thick disc' bin AT1 without abandoning the thin/thick disc picture.
    The paper cites H I evidence for a warp in IC 2531 (Allaert et al. 2015; Kregel et al. 2004), but explicitly states that the position of their proposed line-of-sight warp is not observationally determined (Section 3.3.2).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of An Integral Field Spectroscopy Study Of Thin And Thick Discs In IC 2531." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6OAJRMG6

@misc{pith2026250714989,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: An Integral Field Spectroscopy Study Of Thin And Thick Discs In IC 2531},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6OAJRMG6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.14989}
}
read the original abstract

Thin and thick discs are prominent components in the Milky Way and other spiral galaxies, but their formation histories are not yet understood, which is particularly true for thick discs. This is partially due to the fact that we lack sufficient understanding of thin and thick discs in other galaxies to determine how common features of the Milky Way's discs are. Here, we conduct an integral field spectroscopy study of the thin and thick discs in the edge-on Milky Way analogue IC 2531, using observational data from the WiFeS IFU spectrograph on the ANU 2.3m telescope. We provide spectral analysis of IC 2531's kinematics and stellar populations in the thin and thick disc regions by conducting pPXF fitting with Vazdekis models. We found that IC 2531's disc above the dust plane generally has chemical properties between the Milky Way's chemical thin and thick disc. IC 2531's thick disc is somewhat similar to the Milky Way's in terms of stellar populations: on average, it is older, more metal-poor than its corresponding thin disc, but similarly alpha-enhanced in general. But we do find a clearly alpha-rich thick disc bin though one of our "thick disc" bins may be dominated by a warped thin disc. These results may help to constrain formation theories of thick discs.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.14989 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Pos A and pos B in IC 2531, plotted on top of a V band image from the Carnegie-Irvine Galaxy Survey (CGS), the size of the IFU is 25×38". Our sky location for the nod-and-shuffle observation is also shown. We thank Prof. Luis C. Ho and the Carnegie-Irvine Galaxy Survey team for allowing us to use their images. disc is likely to prevail. The projected radii of centres of pos A and pos B are about 40" and 32" respecti… view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. The diamond-shaped outer isophotes from Subaru star counts out￾line the Milky Way analog NGC 891’s extended diamond-shaped structure (figure 1 of Mouhcine et al. (2010), we thank Prof. Rodrigo Ibata for allowing us to use this image in our paper). synthesis spectra fitting techniques to probe kinematics and stellar population features in the Milky Way analogue IC 2531. It is an ideal galaxy to address the question o… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Reconstructed images for pos A (left) and pos B (right) with our binning scheme (green, to be discussed in section 2.5) overlaid on the CGS V band image of IC 2531. Our reconstructed images are in grayscale, and the CGS image is in reverse grayscale. The bright parts in our reconstructed images and the black parts in the CGS image represent the geometrical thin disc, and their outlines are continuous. The white regi… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (19 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left panel: Plot of the vertical light (wavelength 5450 to 5500 Å) distribution in pos A of IC 2531, averaged over the radial zone 𝑅 = 29" to 46" (4.5 to 7.1 kpc). The short vertical red lines indicate the bright limit of the exponential outer structure of the vertical…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Plot of our bins’ SNR distribution. The SNR of most of our bins are between 20 to 40. The narrower dust lane and thin disc bins still have adequate SNR despite being small, as they are in bright parts of IC 2531. region that makes up the bright edge-on galaxy plane. “A…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The 4864-5345 Å portion of the ppxf fitting results for four thick disc bins. Top left panel: normalised integrated spectrum for AT1 in black overlaid by the ppxf best fit in red. Ionised gas emission lines (Hβ, [O iii]) are shown in blue. Residuals are shown in green.…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Maps of the line-of-sight stellar velocity fields for pos A and B overlaid on the CGS image of IC 2531. Note that we plot stellar velocities for pos A and B with different velocity scales to show more detailed velocity differences within each position; as an edge-on ga…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Plot of our stellar velocities over the observed stellar rotation curve from Kregel & van der Kruit (2005), errors in this plot are ppxf errors. We thank Prof. Piet van der Kruit for allowing us to use this image in our paper. the last paragraph. We calculate those dus…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Plot of our stellar velocity dispersions vs 𝑧, errors in this plot are ppxf errors. of BT2 is old, metal-poor and alpha-enhanced as expected. Several other tests were performed to check for this anomalous result: we tried different sub-binning regions in BT2, result s…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Plot of our stellar velocity dispersions over the stellar velocity dispersion curve from Kregel & van der Kruit (2005), errors in this plot are ppxf errors. We thank Prof. Piet van der Kruit for allowing us to use this image in our paper [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Top panel: all our optical line-of-sight velocities (stellar + gas) ( 𝑝, 𝑣) data plotted over the H i ( 𝑝, 𝑣) data from Kregel et al. (2004). Tangent point velocities in these figures appear near extreme velocity (high in pos B, low in pos A) edges of H i velocities. …
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Plot of differences between stellar and ionised gas velocity (𝑣𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑟 -𝑣𝑔𝑎𝑠 ). Blue regions in pos A and red regions in pos B are where the stellar velocity is closer to the tangent point velocity, and stars are closer to tangent points in the mean [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:fig…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Stellar population in thin discs used to estimate empirical upper limits on uncertainties in our ppxf estimation, the black line is the fitting line. Errors in these plots are Monte Carlo simulations’ 1𝜎 uncertainties. Top panel: age, we assume on average it is a cons…
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Maps of the stellar age for pos A and B [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Maps of [M/H] for pos A and B [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_18.png]
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_19.png]
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Maps of [𝛼/Fe] for pos A and B [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_20.png]
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_21.png]
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: An illustration of the two test bins AT1-test (top panel) and BT1-test (bottom panel). Grey areas indicate the top four-pixel rows that are removed from AT1 and BT1, cf. Figures A1 and A2. rows in bins AT1 and BT1 has a similar effect on both bins. The most significan…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    G., Navarro J

    Abadi M. G., Navarro J. F., Steinmetz M., Eke V. R., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/378316 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...597...21A 597, 21

    doi:10.1086/378316 2003

  2. [2]

    424, 9th International Conference of the Hellenic Astronomical Society

    Akras S., Xilouris E., Patsis P., Boumis P., 2010, in Tsinganos K., Hatzidimitriou D., Matsakos T., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 424, 9th International Conference of the Hellenic Astronomical Society. p. 261

    work page 2010

  3. [3]

    Allaert F., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201526667 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...582A..18A 582, A18

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526667 2015

  4. [4]

    Aniyan S., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty310 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.476.1909A 476, 1909

    doi:10.1093/mnras/sty310 2018

  5. [5]

    A., Freeman K

    Aniyan S., Ponomareva A. A., Freeman K. C., Arnaboldi M., Gerhard O. E., Coccato L., Kuijken K., Merrifield M., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa3106 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.500.3579A 500, 3579

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3106 2021

  6. [6]

    B., Park J

    Ann H. B., Park J. C., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newast.2005.08.006 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006NewA...11..293A 11, 293

    doi:10.1016/j.newast.2005.08.006 2006

  7. [7]

    S., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322631 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...562A..71B 562, A71

    Bensby T., Feltzing S., Oey M. S., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322631 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...562A..71B 562, A71

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322631 2014

  8. [8]

    Bland-Hawthorn J., Gerhard O., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023441 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ARA&A..54..529B 54, 529

    doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023441 2016

Show all 71 references
  1. [9]

    B., Kawata D., Gibson B

    Brook C. B., Kawata D., Gibson B. K., Freeman K. C., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/422709 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...612..894B 612, 894

    2004 doi

  2. [10]

    Bureau M., Athanassoula E., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/430056 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...626..159B 626, 159

    2005 doi

  3. [11]

    Cappellari M., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw3020 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.466..798C 466, 798

    2017 doi

  4. [12]

    Cappellari M., Copin Y., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06541.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.342..345C 342, 345

    2003

  5. [13]

    Cappellari M., Emsellem E., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/381875 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004PASP..116..138C 116, 138

    2004 doi

  6. [14]

    J., Vogt F

    Childress M. J., Vogt F. P. A., Nielsen J., Sharp R. G., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s10509-013-1682-0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014Ap&SS.349..617C 349, 617

    2014 doi

  7. [15]

    Chilingarian I., Prugniel P., Sil’chenko O., Koleva M., 2006, @doi [Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union] 10.1017/S1743921307007752 , 2, 175–176

    2006 doi

  8. [16]

    V., Prugniel P., Sil'Chenko O

    Chilingarian I. V., Prugniel P., Sil'Chenko O. K., Afanasiev V. L., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11549.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.376.1033C 376, 1033

    2007

  9. [17]

    Comer \'o n S., Salo H., Janz J., Laurikainen E., Yoachim P., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201526815 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...584A..34C 584, A34

    2015 doi

  10. [18]

    F., Mentz J., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629292 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...593L...6C 593, L6

    Comer \'o n S., Salo H., Peletier R. F., Mentz J., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629292 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...593L...6C 593, L6

    2016 doi

  11. [19]

    J., Bernstein R

    Dalcanton J. J., Bernstein R. A., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/342286 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002AJ....124.1328D 124, 1328

    2002 doi

  12. [20]

    Dopita M., Hart J., McGregor P., Oates P., Bloxham G., Jones D., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s10509-007-9510-z , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007Ap&SS.310..255D 310, 255

    2007 doi

  13. [21]

    A., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa45d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...853..114E 853, 114

    Eigenbrot A., Bershady M. A., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa45d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...853..114E 853, 114

    2018 doi

  14. [22]

    Gentile G., Fraternali F., Klein U., Salucci P., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20030733 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003A&A...405..969G 405, 969

    2003 doi

  15. [23]

    Gilhuly C., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac6750 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...932...44G 932, 44

    2022 doi

  16. [24]

    Gnerucci A., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201015465 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...528A..88G 528, A88

    2011 doi

  17. [25]

    M., Contini T., Weilbacher P

    Gu \'e rou A., Emsellem E., Krajnovi \'c D., McDermid R. M., Contini T., Weilbacher P. M., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201628743 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...591A.143G 591, A143

    2016 doi

  18. [26]

    R., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/808/2/132 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...808..132H 808, 132

    Hayden M. R., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/808/2/132 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...808..132H 808, 132

    2015 doi

  19. [27]

    D., Katz D., G \'o mez A., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321397 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...560A.109H 560, A109

    Haywood M., Di Matteo P., Lehnert M. D., Katz D., G \'o mez A., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321397 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...560A.109H 560, A109

    2013 doi

  20. [28]

    Iannuzzi F., Athanassoula E., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv764 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.450.2514I 450, 2514

    2015 doi

  21. [29]

    Ibata R., Mouhcine M., Rejkuba M., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14536.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.395..126I 395, 126

    2009

  22. [30]

    Just A., Fuchs B., Wielen R., 1996, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996A&A...309..715J 309, 715

    1996

  23. [31]

    V., Katkov I

    Kasparova A. V., Katkov I. Y., Chilingarian I. V., Silchenko O. K., Moiseev A. V., Borisov S. B., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slw083 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.460L..89K 460, L89

    2016 doi

  24. [32]

    V., Katkov I

    Kasparova A. V., Katkov I. Y., Chilingarian I. V., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa611 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.493.5464K 493, 5464

    2020 doi

  25. [33]

    A., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/758/2/106 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...758..106K 758, 106

    Kassin S. A., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/758/2/106 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...758..106K 758, 106

    2012 doi

  26. [34]

    Y., Kniazev A

    Katkov I. Y., Kniazev A. Y., Kasparova A. V., Sil'chenko O. K., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty3268 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.483.2413K 483, 2413

    2019 doi

  27. [35]

    C., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08811.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MNRAS.358..481K 358, 481

    Kregel M., van der Kruit P. C., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08811.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MNRAS.358..481K 358, 481

    2005

  28. [36]

    C., de Blok W

    Kregel M., van der Kruit P. C., de Blok W. J. G., Freeman K. C., 2002a, in Athanassoula E., Bosma A., Mujica R., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 275, Disks of Galaxies: Kinematics, Dynamics and Peturbations. pp 47--48

  29. [37]

    C., de Grijs R., 2002b, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05556.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002MNRAS.334..646K 334, 646

    Kregel M., van der Kruit P. C., de Grijs R., 2002b, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05556.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002MNRAS.334..646K 334, 646

    2002

  30. [38]

    C., de Blok W

    Kregel M., van der Kruit P. C., de Blok W. J. G., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07990.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004MNRAS.352..768K 352, 768

    2004

  31. [39]

    Le Borgne D., Rocca-Volmerange B., Prugniel P., Lan c on A., Fioc M., Soubiran C., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:200400044 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004A&A...425..881L 425, 881

    2004 doi

  32. [40]

    E., Kovtyukh V

    Luck R. E., Kovtyukh V. V., Andrievsky S. M., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/505687 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006AJ....132..902L 132, 902

    2006 doi

  33. [41]

    Martig M., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab2729 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.508.2458M 508, 2458

    2021 doi

  34. [42]

    V., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201628676 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...592A..71M 592, A71

    Mosenkov A. V., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201628676 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...592A..71M 592, A71

    2016 doi

  35. [43]

    Mosenkov A., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa678 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.494.1751M 494, 1751

    2020 doi

  36. [44]

    Mouhcine M., Ibata R., Rejkuba M., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/714/1/L12 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...714L..12M 714, L12

    2010 doi

  37. [45]

    A., Dettmar R.-J., Saha K., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa1400 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.495.3705N 495, 3705

    Narayan C. A., Dettmar R.-J., Saha K., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa1400 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.495.3705N 495, 3705

    2020 doi

  38. [46]

    C., Freeman K

    O'Brien J. C., Freeman K. C., van der Kruit P. C., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200912567 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...515A..62O 515, A62

    2010 doi

  39. [47]

    Pinna F., et al., 2019a, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833193 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...623A..19P 623, A19

    doi

  40. [48]

    Pinna F., et al., 2019b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201935154 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...625A..95P 625, A95

    doi

  41. [49]

    J., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0006301 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000A&A...359..433R 359, 433

    Rossa J., Dettmar R. J., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0006301 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000A&A...359..433R 359, 433

    2000 doi arXiv

  42. [50]

    M., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833007 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...618A...3R 618, A3

    Roth M. M., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833007 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...618A...3R 618, A3

    2018 doi

  43. [51]

    S \'a nchez-Bl \'a zquez P., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10699.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.371..703S 371, 703

    2006

  44. [52]

    Santucci G., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5bd5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...930..153S 930, 153

    2022 doi

  45. [53]

    Sarzi M., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833137 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...616A.121S 616, A121

    2018 doi

  46. [54]

    A., van de Ven G., Minchev I., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad275 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.520.3066S 520, 3066

    Sattler N., Pinna F., Neumayer N., Falc \'o n-Barroso J., Martig M., Gadotti D. A., van de Ven G., Minchev I., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad275 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.520.3066S 520, 3066

    2023 doi

  47. [55]

    R., McDermid R., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/abfc57 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...913L..11S 913, L11

    Scott N., van de Sande J., Sharma S., Bland-Hawthorn J., Freeman K., Gerhard O., Hayden M. R., McDermid R., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/abfc57 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...913L..11S 913, L11

    2021 doi

  48. [56]

    Shang Z., et al., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/311563 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...504L..23S 504, L23

    1998 doi

  49. [57]

    Vazdekis A., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv151 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.449.1177V 449, 1177

    2015 doi

  50. [58]

    V., 1985, @doi [ ] 10.1086/162960 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985ApJ...290...75V 290, 75

    Villumsen J. V., 1985, @doi [ ] 10.1086/162960 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985ApJ...290...75V 290, 75

    1985 doi

  51. [59]

    J., Freeman K

    Wainscoat R. J., Freeman K. C., Hyland A. R., 1989, @doi [ ] 10.1086/167096 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989ApJ...337..163W 337, 163

    1989 doi

  52. [60]

    Wisnioski E., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/799/2/209 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...799..209W 799, 209

    2015 doi

  53. [61]

    M., Gerhard O

    Wylie S. M., Gerhard O. E., Ness M. K., Clarke J. P., Freeman K. C., Bland-Hawthorn J., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202140990 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...653A.143W 653, A143

    2021 doi

  54. [62]

    M., Byun Y

    Xilouris E. M., Byun Y. I., Kylafis N. D., Paleologou E. V., Papamastorakis J., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9901158 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999A&A...344..868X 344, 868

    1999 doi arXiv

  55. [63]

    J., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/428922 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...624..701Y 624, 701

    Yoachim P., Dalcanton J. J., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/428922 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...624..701Y 624, 701

    2005 doi

  56. [64]

    J., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/590246 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...683..707Y 683, 707

    Yoachim P., Dalcanton J. J., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/590246 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...683..707Y 683, 707

    2008 doi

  57. [65]

    B., Martig M., Hayden M

    van de Sande J., Fraser-McKelvie A., Fisher D. B., Martig M., Hayden M. R., Geckos Survey Collaboration 2024, in Tabatabaei F., Barbuy B., Ting Y.-S., eds, IAU Symposium Vol. 377, Early Disk-Galaxy Formation from JWST to the Milky Way. pp 27--33 ( @eprint arXiv 2306.00059 ), @...

    2024 arXiv

  58. [66]

    van den Bosch R. C. E., van de Ven G., Verolme E. K., Cappellari M., de Zeeuw P. T., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.12874.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.385..647V 385, 647

    2008

  59. [67]

    C., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20066941 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...466..883V 466, 883

    van der Kruit P. C., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20066941 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...466..883V 466, 883

    2007 doi

  60. [68]

    C., Freeman K

    van der Kruit P. C., Freeman K. C., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-083109-153241 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ARA&A..49..301V 49, 301

    2011 doi

  61. [69]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.stat...

  62. [70]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.stat...

  63. [71]

    B., Martig M., Hayden M

    van de Sande J., Fraser-McKelvie A., Fisher D. B., Martig M., Hayden M. R., Geckos Survey Collaboration, 2024, IAUS, 377, 27. doi:10.1017/S1743921323001138

    2024 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.