Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 minor 120 references

Stellar evolution through the Red Supergiant phase

T0 review · 0 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that the red supergiant phase is a near-universal stage of massive-star evolution and that its poorly known mass-loss rate is the key to predicting how those stars die.

desk verdict A competent, well-organized review of RSG evolution that consolidates known results; no new science, but the central mass-loss argument holds up and the flaws are editorial. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.15960 v1 pith:45IJFJGP submitted 2025-07-21 astro-ph.SR

Sylvia Ekström , Cyril Georgy This is my paper
classification astro-ph.SR PACS 97.10.Cv97.20.Pm97.60.Bw
keywords redsupergiantsmassivestarevolutionmasslosscore-collapsesupernovaetypeIIPblueloopsHertzsprung-Russelldiagramstellarconvection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Massive stars between roughly 9 and 30 solar masses spend a decisive stretch of their lives as red supergiants, and this paper argues that the phase is both near-universal and poorly understood in one key respect: how much mass these stars lose. Under a standard initial mass function, about 90% of single massive stars pass through the red supergiant stage and about 80% die in it, making RSGs the dominant progenitors of type II supernovae. The review contends that the mass-loss rate during this phase is the single most critical unknown, because it decides whether a star stays red until explosion, loops back blueward, becomes a Wolf-Rayet star, or collapses directly into a black hole. Getting this number right would change predicted supernova types and the mapping between initial stellar mass and stellar death.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the red supergiant phase itself, characterised by a deep convective envelope that engulfs 60-70% of the star's mass and more than 99% of its radius. The argument runs on the interplay between three mechanisms: the mirror effect that expands the envelope when the core contracts; the first dredge-up that creates a sharp H-He discontinuity whose position controls whether Cepheid blue loops occur; and the mass-loss rate, which for the most massive RSGs can remove enough envelope for the core to exceed about 60% of the total mass and force a permanent blueward evolution. The review's quantitative conclusions follow from connecting these mechanisms to one-dimensional stellar evolution models and to observed RSG populations in nearby galaxies.

What would settle it

A decisive test would be a precise measurement of the RSG mass-loss rate as a function of luminosity and metallicity using a homogeneous sample in the Magellanic Clouds and the Milky Way, compared directly to the prescriptions used in evolution codes. If the true rates turned out to be systematically an order of magnitude lower than the commonly used luminosity-scaled prescription, the predicted fractions of type IIP supernovae and the number of RSGs ending their lives in the red would change, resolving the red supergiant problem by direct collapse rather than by blueward evolution.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the red supergiant phase is a near-universal waypoint in massive-star evolution and that its mass-loss history controls the late evolution and final fate. The paper describes how the structure changes after the main sequence: the contracting helium core inflates the envelope through the mirror effect, the outermost 60-70% of the mass becomes convective, and the first dredge-up brings CNO-processed material to the surface. It then identifies the H-He composition discontinuity left by the dredge-up as the trigger for Cepheid blue loops in stars below about 12 solar masses, while for more massive RSGs the deciding factor is mass loss: if enough of the hydrogen-rich envelope is removed, the star leaves the red side of the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram and ends its life elsewhere. The authors state that knowing the RSG mass-loss history precisely is mandatory for correct modelling of late massive-star evolution, and that the most critical process to constrain is the RSG mass-loss rate.

Load-bearing premise

The quantitative boundaries, including the 9-30 solar mass RSG range and the 90% and 80% phase fractions, rest on current one-dimensional stellar evolution codes being faithful enough in their treatment of convection, rotation, and mass loss to set these limits.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If RSG mass-loss rates are higher than currently adopted, more stars leave the red supergiant branch before death, shifting predicted supernova types from type IIP toward IIL, IIb, or stripped-envelope explosions.
  • If mass-loss rates are lower, the upper end of the RSG progenitor mass range around 16.5 solar masses is easier to reconcile with direct black-hole collapse.
  • Accurately constraining episodic outbursts and their frequency would change the predicted circumstellar medium around progenitors, linking models to early supernova observations.
  • Better mass-loss knowledge would sharpen the use of RSGs as distance indicators and as metallicity probes in external galaxies.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An extension of this picture is that the boundary of the RSG mass window itself is model-dependent: an independent determination of mass-loss rates would also re-map which stars become Wolf-Rayet stars, especially at low metallicity.
  • The same convective-envelope physics that makes RSG winds hard to model also helps explain the drop in binary fraction from more than 60% for O-type stars to about 30% for RSGs, suggesting that mass-transfer history and mass-loss history are inseparable.
  • A testable extension would be to couple time-resolved monitoring of RSG outbursts with the observed presence or absence of circumstellar shells around type II supernova progenitors, directly calibrating the bursty component of mass loss that current models average over decade-to-century timesteps.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript is an invited review of the red supergiant (RSG) phase of massive stellar evolution. After introducing the modified Conti scenario and quantifying the phase's prevalence, it discusses the post-main-sequence mirror effect and the physical causes of the Hertzsprung-gap crossing; the convective structure, surface granulation, radius increase, and binary-interaction consequences of RSGs; the observational and theoretical status of RSG mass loss; and the late evolution, including Cepheid blue loops, blueward excursions, supernova types, and direct black-hole collapse. The review's central claim is that the RSG phase is a near-universal and decisive stage for single stars in the roughly 9-30 Msun range, and that the poorly constrained mass-loss rates, both steady and eruptive, are the most critical missing input for predicting the late evolution and final fate of these stars.

Significance. The review is a useful synthesis for its intended Special Issue. Its strengths are breadth and balance: it combines the authors' GENEC grids with MIST models, observational constraints from M31, M33, and the Galaxy, supernova progenitor studies, and a fair treatment of the ongoing red supergiant problem debate, even when that debate concerns the authors' own models. It does not claim new derivations; the mirror-effect argument is the standard textbook result, and the quantitative mass boundaries are presented with caveats about model dependence. The central research-priority claim, that steady and eruptive mass loss during the RSG phase is the key uncertainty for late evolution and endpoints, is supported by the cited model experiments and observations. I found no circularity: the conclusions are grounded in external literature and published model grids. The remaining issues are presentation and consistency items.

minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract and Section 1] The abstract states that 'about 80% of all single massive stars will experience this phase', while Section 1 states that 'about 90% of single massive stars will have an RSG phase at some point in their life' and that 80% end their life as RSGs; please harmonize these numbers, for example by saying about 90% experience the phase and about 80% end their life in it.
  2. [Section 3.4] In the Kelvin-Helmholtz timescale expression, tau_KH = GM^2/(R L_gamma), the symbol in the denominator should be L_nu, not L_gamma, and the preceding sentence should also refer to the neutrino luminosity consistently.
  3. [Section 1] The introductory sentence gives the RSG mass range as about 9-30 Msun, while footnote 1 integrates the IMF over 8-40 Msun; please clarify that these are respectively the model-based RSG range and the integration interval adopted for the quoted percentages.
  4. [Various sections] Several references to companion reviews in the Special Issue (van Loon; Jones and Humphreys; Van Dyk) have no bibliographic entries; if the standalone version is to be self-contained, these should be supplied or marked as forthcoming in the same issue.
  5. [Section 1] The typesetting of the modified Conti scenario list is confusing, with 'RSG' serving both as a state and as a terminal label and with the 25-30 Msun arrow broken across lines; please reformat the sequence for readability.
  6. [Section 4.2] The text uses an author-name citation style ('see Meynet et al. 103') in a reference list that is otherwise purely numeric; please convert this to the journal's numbered style.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: this is a review whose synthesis and priority claims are supported by external observations, independent model grids, and published self-authored model calculations that are not fitted to the review's conclusions.

full rationale

This is a review article, not a new derivation. The central claim that the red supergiant phase is a near-universal, decisive stage and that mass-loss rates are the critical unknown is supported by external observational determinations (Massey et al. 2021, Beasor & Davies 2018, Davies & Beasor 2020) and by independent model grids such as MIST, in addition to the authors' own GENEC grids. The GENEC models cited for the 9-30 Msun range, HRD tracks, and mass-loss sensitivity studies are published stellar-evolution calculations with stated physical assumptions; they are not fitted to the review's conclusion, and the review explicitly acknowledges the model-dependence and ongoing debate around the red supergiant problem. The only in-paper derivation, the mirror-effect relation in Sect. 2, follows from standard energy conservation and virial arguments and does not reduce to any fitted input. The blue-loop discussion draws on external parametric studies and observations alongside the authors' own models. The abstract's 'about 80%' versus Sect. 1's 'about 90% will have an RSG phase, 80% end life as RSG' is an internal wording inconsistency, not circularity. No equation is defined in terms of its target conclusion, no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors. The paper therefore exhibits no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This is a review, so the ledger captures the background assumptions the overview depends on rather than new fitted parameters. No new entities are introduced. The main dependencies are the Salpeter IMF assumption for the phase fractions, the standard virial-theorem treatment of the mirror effect, the reliability of the published GENEC and MIST model grids, and the debated progenitor mass limit.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Salpeter initial mass function with the stated mass range 8-40 Msun for single massive stars.
    Used in Sect. 1 to derive the 90%/80% fractions of stars experiencing or ending in the RSG phase; the fraction depends on the assumed IMF slope and the mass limits.
  • standard math The virial theorem and energy conservation (2U + Omega = 0, U + Omega = const) apply to the post-main-sequence contracting core.
    Used in Sect. 2 to derive the mirror-effect relation dR_star/dR_core; this is a standard textbook result (Padmanabhan 2001) but is an assumption about the timescale ordering.
  • domain assumption One-dimensional stellar evolution codes (GENEC, MIST) with the adopted convective criteria, rotation, and mass-loss recipes produce reliable evolutionary tracks for defining the RSG mass ranges and endpoints.
    The review overlays these models on observed HRDs (Fig. 2) and uses them for the phase fractions, blue loop masses, and blueward evolution scenarios in Sects. 1, 3, and 4.
  • domain assumption The inferred progenitor masses of type IIP supernovae from pre-explosion imaging are accurate enough to establish the 16.5 Msun upper limit.
    Sect. 4.2 uses this limit to formulate the red supergiant problem and to argue for either direct black hole collapse or strong late mass loss; the cited works (Smartt et al. 2009, 2015) are however debated (refs 116, 117), as the review itself notes.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Stellar evolution through the Red Supergiant phase." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/45IJFJGP

@misc{pith2026250715960,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Stellar evolution through the Red Supergiant phase},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/45IJFJGP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.15960}
}
read the original abstract

Massive stars less massive than ~30 Msol evolve into a red supergiant after the main sequence. Given a standard IMF, this means about 80% of all single massive stars will experience this phase. RSGs are dominated by convection, with a radius that may extend up to thousands of solar radii. Their low temperature and gravity make them prone to lose large amounts of masses, either through a pulsationally-driven wind or through mass-loss outburst. RSGs are the progenitors of the most common core-collapse supernovae, the type II. In the present review, we give an overview of our theoretical understanding about this spectacular phase of massive stars evolution.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.15960 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. HRD showing typical evolutionary pathway for three different initial masses at solar metallicity, and with an initial rotation Vini = 0.4 Vcrit (models from [10]). The green dots mark the location at the start of He burning. The 9 M⊙ model (black) shows a quick crossing of the HRD at the end of the MS, and a blue loop during the RSG phase. The 15 M⊙ model (red) shows a rather slow crossing to the RSG branch. The 25 … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. HRD of observed RSG ([36], red dots) in M31 (left), and M33 (right). Stellar evolution tracks are overplotted: GENEC models (solid lines) from [10] for M31 (Z = 0.014), and from [37] for M33 (Z = 0.006); MIST models (dotted lines) from [38] with [Fe/H]=0 for M31, and [Fe/H]=-0.5 for M33. Adapted from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Kippenhahn diagram of a 15 M⊙ model at solar metallicity (model from [54]). The convective zones are the blue shaded regions. Lines of iso-R are displayed. The central burning phases are indicated in red. The thick black line shows the total mass evolution of the star. to isolated supergiants that will increase the RSG luminosity dispersion of clusters [16]. The merger can also occur later, after a common-envelope p… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Duration of the RSG phase (in fraction of the total lifetime) as a function of the mass lost in this phase (in fraction of the total initial mass). Data from the non-rotating models of [10]. The region of low dM - large dt (occupied by the lowest-mass models) is shaded…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

120 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    On the relationship between Of and WR stars

    Conti, P .S. On the relationship between Of and WR stars. Memoires of the Société Royale des Sciences de Liège 1975, 9, 193

    1975

  2. [2]

    The evolution of massive stars with mass loss

    Chiosi, C.; Maeder, A. The evolution of massive stars with mass loss. ARA&A 1986, 24, 329

    1986

  3. [3]

    Presupernova evolution in massive interacting binaries

    Podsiadlowski, P .; Joss, P .C.; Hsu, J.J.L. Presupernova evolution in massive interacting binaries. ApJ 1992, 391, 246–264

    1992

  4. [4]

    The Wolf-Rayet Population Predicted by Massive Single Star and Massive Binary Evolution

    Vanbeveren, D.; Van Bever, J.; Belkus, H. The Wolf-Rayet Population Predicted by Massive Single Star and Massive Binary Evolution. ApJL 2007, 662, L107–L110

    2007

  5. [5]

    The effect of massive binaries on stellar populations and supernova progenitors

    Eldridge, J.J.; Izzard, R.G.; Tout, C.A. The effect of massive binaries on stellar populations and supernova progenitors. MNRAS 2008, 384, 1109–1118

    2008

  6. [6]

    Binary Population and Spectral Synthesis Version 2.1: Construction, Observational Verification, and New Results

    Eldridge, J.J.; Stanway, E.R.; Xiao, L.; McClelland, L.A.S.; Taylor, G.; Ng, M.; Greis, S.M.L.; Bray, J.C. Binary Population and Spectral Synthesis Version 2.1: Construction, Observational Verification, and New Results. P ASA2017, 34, e058, [arXiv:astro- ph.SR/1710.02154]. https://doi.org/10.1017/pasa.2017.51

    arXiv

  7. [7]

    The population synthesis of Wolf-Rayet stars involving binary merger channels

    Li, Z.; Zhu, C.; Lü, G.; Li, L.; Liu, H.; Guo, S.; Yu, J.; Lu, X. The Population Synthesis of Wolf–Rayet Stars Involving Binary Merger Channels. ApJ 2024, 969, 160, [arXiv:astro-ph.SR/2405.11571]. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad4da8

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    The Evolution of Massive Binary Stars

    Marchant, P .; Bodensteiner, J. The Evolution of Massive Binary Stars. ARA&A 2024, 62, 21–61, [arXiv:astro-ph.SR/2311.01865]. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-052722-105936

    arXiv 2024

Show all 120 references
  1. [9]

    The Luminosity Function and Stellar Evolution

    Salpeter, E.E. The Luminosity Function and Stellar Evolution. ApJ 1955, 121, 161–+

    1955

  2. [10]

    Grids of stellar models with rotation

    Ekström, S.; Georgy, C.; Eggenberger, P .; Meynet, G.; Mowlavi, N.; Wyttenbach, A.; Granada, A.; Decressin, T.; Hirschi, R.; Frischknecht, U.; et al. Grids of stellar models with rotation. I. Models from 0.8 to 120 M ⊙ at solar metallicity (Z = 0.014). A&A 2012, 537, A146

    2012

  3. [11]

    On the effect of rotation on populations of classical Cepheids

    Anderson, R.I.; Saio, H.; Ekström, S.; Georgy, C.; Meynet, G. On the effect of rotation on populations of classical Cepheids. II. Pulsation analysis for metallicities 0.014, 0.006, and 0.002. A&A 2016, 591, A8

    2016

  4. [12]

    Steps toward the Hubble constant

    Sandage, A.; Tammann, G.A. Steps toward the Hubble constant. II. The brightest stars in late-type spiral galaxies. ApJ 1974, 191, 603–621. https://doi.org/10.1086/153001

    1974 doi

  5. [13]

    Infrared observations of late-type supergiants in the Magellanic Clouds

    Glass, I.S. Infrared observations of late-type supergiants in the Magellanic Clouds. MNRAS 1979, 186, 317

    1979

  6. [14]

    Period-luminosity relations for red supergiant variables - II

    Jurcevic, J.S.; Pierce, M.J.; Jacoby, G.H. Period-luminosity relations for red supergiant variables - II. The distance to M101.MNRAS 2000, 313, 868

    2000

  7. [15]

    The period-luminosity relation of red supergiants with Gaia DR2

    Chatys, F.W.; Bedding, T.R.; Murphy, S.J.; Kiss, L.L.; Dobie, D.; Grindlay, J.E. The period-luminosity relation of red supergiants with Gaia DR2. MNRAS 2019, 487, 4832

    2019

  8. [16]

    Using Detailed Single-star and Binary-evolution Models to Probe the Large Observed Luminosity Spread of Red Supergiants in Young Open Star Clusters

    Wang, C.; Patrick, L.; Schootemeijer, A.; de Mink, S.E.; Langer, N.; Britavskiy, N.; Xu, X.T.; Bodensteiner, J.; Laplace, E.; Valli, R.; et al. Using Detailed Single-star and Binary-evolution Models to Probe the Large Observed Luminosity Spread of Red Supergiants in Young Open...

    2025

  9. [17]

    The potential of red supergiants as extragalactic abundance probes at low spectral resolution

    Davies, B.; Kudritzki, R.P .; Figer, D.F. The potential of red supergiants as extragalactic abundance probes at low spectral resolution. MNRAS 2010, 407, 1203

    2010

  10. [18]

    Red Supergiant Stars as Cosmic Abundance Probes: NLTE Effects in J-band Iron and Titanium Lines

    Bergemann, M.; Kudritzki, R.P .; Plez, B.; Davies, B.; Lind, K.; Gazak, Z. Red Supergiant Stars as Cosmic Abundance Probes: NLTE Effects in J-band Iron and Titanium Lines. ApJ 2012, 751, 156

    2012

  11. [19]

    The Reddening of Red Supergiants: When Smoke Gets in Your Eyes

    Massey, P .; Plez, B.; Levesque, E.M.; Olsen, K.A.G.; Clayton, G.C.; Josselin, E. The Reddening of Red Supergiants: When Smoke Gets in Your Eyes. ApJ 2005, 634, 1286

    2005

  12. [20]

    The evolved-star dust budget of the Small Magellanic Cloud: the critical role of a few key players

    Srinivasan, S.; Boyer, M.L.; Kemper, F.; Meixner, M.; Sargent, B.A.; Riebel, D. The evolved-star dust budget of the Small Magellanic Cloud: the critical role of a few key players. MNRAS 2016, 457, 2814

    2016

  13. [21]

    Dust Production Factories in the Early Universe: Formation of Carbon Grains in Red-supergiant Winds of Very Massive Population III Stars

    Nozawa, T.; Yoon, S.C.; Maeda, K.; Kozasa, T.; Nomoto, K.; Langer, N. Dust Production Factories in the Early Universe: Formation of Carbon Grains in Red-supergiant Winds of Very Massive Population III Stars. ApJL 2014, 787, L17

    2014

  14. [22]

    The Dynamics, Destruction, and Survival of Supernova-formed Dust Grains

    Slavin, J.D.; Dwek, E.; Mac Low, M.M.; Hill, A.S. The Dynamics, Destruction, and Survival of Supernova-formed Dust Grains. ApJ 2020, 902, 135, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2009.01895]. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abb5a4

    2020 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Two Massive, Compact, and Dust-obscured Candidate z ≃ 8 Galaxies Discovered by JWST

    Akins, H.B.; Casey, C.M.; Allen, N.; Bagley, M.B.; Dickinson, M.; Finkelstein, S.L.; Franco, M.; Harish, S.; Arrabal Haro, P .; Ilbert, O.; et al. Two Massive, Compact, and Dust-obscured Candidate z ≃ 8 Galaxies Discovered by JWST. ApJ 2023, 956, 61

    2023

  16. [24]

    Why do giants puff up? ApJ 1985, 296, 554

    Yahil, A.; van den Horn, L. Why do giants puff up? ApJ 1985, 296, 554

    1985

  17. [25]

    Why Stars Become Red Giants

    Applegate, J.H. Why Stars Become Red Giants. ApJ 1988, 329, 803

    1988

  18. [26]

    Qualitative Explanations of Red Giant Formation

    Bhaskar, R.; Nigam, A. Qualitative Explanations of Red Giant Formation. ApJ 1991, 372, 592

    1991

  19. [27]

    Theoretical Astrophysics, Volume 2: Stars and Stellar Systems; 2001

    Padmanabhan, T. Theoretical Astrophysics, Volume 2: Stars and Stellar Systems; 2001. Galaxies 2025, 13, 81 12 of 15

    2001

  20. [28]

    Why Stars Become Red Giants

    Sugimoto, D.; Fujimoto, M.Y. Why Stars Become Red Giants. ApJ 2000, 538, 837

    2000

  21. [29]

    The impact of convective criteria on the properties of massive stars

    Sibony, Y.; Georgy, C.; Ekström, S.; Meynet, G. The impact of convective criteria on the properties of massive stars. A&A 2023, 680, A101

    2023

  22. [30]

    Stellar evolution with rotation

    Maeder, A.; Meynet, G. Stellar evolution with rotation. VII. Low metallicity models and the blue to red supergiant ratio in the SMC. A&A 2001, 373, 555

    2001

  23. [31]

    Stellar Models with Convection and with Discontinuity of the Mean Molecular Weight

    Ledoux, P . Stellar Models with Convection and with Discontinuity of the Mean Molecular Weight. ApJ 1947, 105, 305

    1947

  24. [32]

    Structure and evolution of the stars.; Princeton University Press, 1958

    Schwarzschild, M. Structure and evolution of the stars.; Princeton University Press, 1958

    1958

  25. [33]

    SNAPSHOT: connections between internal and surface properties of massive stars

    Farrell, E.J.; Groh, J.H.; Meynet, G.; Eldridge, J.J.; Ekström, S.; Georgy, C. SNAPSHOT: connections between internal and surface properties of massive stars. MNRAS 2020, 495, 4659

    2020

  26. [34]

    Studies of luminous stars in nearby galaxies

    Humphreys, R.M.; Davidson, K. Studies of luminous stars in nearby galaxies. III - Comments on the evolution of the most massive stars in the Milky Way and the Large Magellanic Cloud. ApJ 1979, 232, 409

    1979

  27. [35]

    The luminosities of cool supergiants in the Magellanic Clouds, and the Humphreys- Davidson limit revisited

    Davies, B.; Crowther, P .A.; Beasor, E.R. The luminosities of cool supergiants in the Magellanic Clouds, and the Humphreys- Davidson limit revisited. MNRAS 2018, 478, 3138

    2018

  28. [36]

    The Red Supergiant Content of M31 and M33

    Massey, P .; Neugent, K.F.; Levesque, E.M.; Drout, M.R.; Courteau, S. The Red Supergiant Content of M31 and M33. AJ 2021, 161, 79

    2021

  29. [37]

    Grids of stellar models with rotation

    Eggenberger, P .; Ekström, S.; Georgy, C.; Martinet, S.; Pezzotti, C.; Nandal, D.; Meynet, G.; Buldgen, G.; Salmon, S.; Haemmerlé, L.; et al. Grids of stellar models with rotation. VI. Models from 0.8 to 120 M ⊙ at a metallicity Z = 0.006. A&A 2021, 652, A137

    2021

  30. [38]

    Mesa Isochrones and Stellar Tracks (MIST)

    Choi, J.; Dotter, A.; Conroy, C.; Cantiello, M.; Paxton, B.; Johnson, B.D. Mesa Isochrones and Stellar Tracks (MIST). I. Solar-scaled Models. ApJ 2016, 823, 102

    2016

  31. [39]

    The Surface Ratio of N 14 to C12 during Helium Burning

    Iben, Jr., I. The Surface Ratio of N 14 to C12 during Helium Burning. ApJ 1964, 140, 1631

    1964

  32. [40]

    Chemical Abundance Patterns in the Inner Galaxy: The Scutum Red Supergiant Clusters

    Davies, B.; Origlia, L.; Kudritzki, R.P .; Figer, D.F.; Rich, R.M.; Najarro, F.; Negueruela, I.; Clark, J.S. Chemical Abundance Patterns in the Inner Galaxy: The Scutum Red Supergiant Clusters. ApJ 2009, 696, 2014–2025, [arXiv:astro-ph.GA/0902.2378]. https://doi.org/10.1088/00...

    2009 arXiv

  33. [41]

    The Chemical Abundances in the Galactic Center from the Atmospheres of Red Supergiants

    Davies, B.; Origlia, L.; Kudritzki, R.P .; Figer, D.F.; Rich, R.M.; Najarro, F. The Chemical Abundances in the Galactic Center from the Atmospheres of Red Supergiants. ApJ 2009, 694, 46–55, [arXiv:astro-ph/0811.3179]. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/694/ 1/46

    2009 arXiv

  34. [42]

    First Image of the Surface of a Star with the Hubble Space Telescope

    Gilliland, R.L.; Dupree, A.K. First Image of the Surface of a Star with the Hubble Space Telescope. ApJL 1996, 463, L29

    1996

  35. [43]

    The Nonspherical Shape of Betelgeuse in the Mid-Infrared

    Tatebe, K.; Chandler, A.A.; Wishnow, E.H.; Hale, D.D.S.; Townes, C.H. The Nonspherical Shape of Betelgeuse in the Mid-Infrared. ApJL 2007, 670, L21

    2007

  36. [44]

    Imaging the spotty surface of Betelgeuse in the H band

    Haubois, X.; Perrin, G.; Lacour, S.; Verhoelst, T.; Meimon, S.; Mugnier, L.; Thiébaut, E.; Berger, J.P .; Ridgway, S.T.; Monnier, J.D.; et al. Imaging the spotty surface of Betelgeuse in the H band. A&A 2009, 508, 923

    2009

  37. [45]

    Radiative hydrodynamics simulations of red supergiant stars

    Chiavassa, A.; Plez, B.; Josselin, E.; Freytag, B. Radiative hydrodynamics simulations of red supergiant stars. I. interpretation of interferometric observations. A&A 2009, 506, 1351

    2009

  38. [46]

    Radiative hydrodynamics simulations of red supergiant stars

    Chiavassa, A.; Haubois, X.; Young, J.S.; Plez, B.; Josselin, E.; Perrin, G.; Freytag, B. Radiative hydrodynamics simulations of red supergiant stars. II. Simulations of convection on Betelgeuse match interferometric observations. A&A 2010, 515, A12

    2010

  39. [47]

    On the Scale of Photospheric Convection

    Freytag, B.; Holweger, H.; Steffen, M.; Ludwig, H.G. On the Scale of Photospheric Convection. In Proceedings of the Science with the VLT Interferometer; Paresce, F., Ed., 1997, p. 316

    1997

  40. [48]

    A grid of MARCS model atmospheres for late-type stars

    Gustafsson, B.; Edvardsson, B.; Eriksson, K.; Jørgensen, U.G.; Nordlund, Å.; Plez, B. A grid of MARCS model atmospheres for late-type stars. I. Methods and general properties. A&A 2008, 486, 951

    2008

  41. [49]

    Long Term Evolution of Surface Features on the Red Supergiant AZ Cyg

    Norris, R.P .; Baron, F.R.; Monnier, J.D.; Paladini, C.; Anderson, M.D.; Martinez, A.O.; Schaefer, G.H.; Che, X.; Chiavassa, A.; Connelley, M.S.; et al. Long Term Evolution of Surface Features on the Red Supergiant AZ Cyg. ApJ 2021, 919, 124

    2021

  42. [50]

    Radiative hydrodynamic simulations of red supergiant stars

    Chiavassa, A.; Pasquato, E.; Jorissen, A.; Sacuto, S.; Babusiaux, C.; Freytag, B.; Ludwig, H.G.; Cruzalèbes, P .; Rabbia, Y.; Spang, A.; et al. Radiative hydrodynamic simulations of red supergiant stars. III. Spectro-photocentric variability, photometric variability, and conse...

    2011

  43. [51]

    Probing red supergiant dynamics through photo-center displacements measured by Gaia

    Chiavassa, A.; Kudritzki, R.; Davies, B.; Freytag, B.; de Mink, S.E. Probing red supergiant dynamics through photo-center displacements measured by Gaia. A&A 2022, 661, L1

    2022

  44. [52]

    A non-detection of red supergiant convection in Gaia

    Kochanek, C.S. A non-detection of red supergiant convection in Gaia. MNRAS 2023, 520, 3510

    2023

  45. [53]

    Variability in red supergiant stars: pulsations, long secondary periods and convection noise

    Kiss, L.L.; Szabó, G.M.; Bedding, T.R. Variability in red supergiant stars: pulsations, long secondary periods and convection noise. MNRAS 2006, 372, 1721–1734, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0608438]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10973.x

    2006 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Evolving massive stars to core collapse with GENEC: Extension of equation of state, opacities and effective nuclear network

    Griffiths, A.; Aloy, M.Á.; Hirschi, R.; Reichert, M.; Obergaulinger, M.; Whitehead, E.E.; Martinet, S.; Sciarini, L.; Ekström, S.; Meynet, G. Evolving massive stars to core collapse with GENEC: Extension of equation of state, opacities and effective nuclear network. A&A 2025, 693, A93

    2025

  47. [55]

    The VLT-FLAMES Tarantula Survey

    Sana, H.; de Koter, A.; de Mink, S.E.; Dunstall, P .R.; Evans, C.J.; Hénault-Brunet, V .; Maíz Apellániz, J.; Ramírez-Agudelo, O.H.; Taylor, W.D.; Walborn, N.R.; et al. The VLT-FLAMES Tarantula Survey. VIII. Multiplicity properties of the O-type star population. A&A 2013, 550,...

    2013 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Multiplicity of the red supergiant population in the young massive cluster NGC 330

    Patrick, L.R.; Lennon, D.J.; Evans, C.J.; Sana, H.; Bodensteiner, J.; Britavskiy, N.; Dorda, R.; Herrero, A.; Negueruela, I.; de Koter, A. Multiplicity of the red supergiant population in the young massive cluster NGC 330. A&A 2020, 635, A29

    2020

  49. [57]

    The Red Supergiant Binary Fraction as a Function of Metallicity in M31 and M33

    Neugent, K.F. The Red Supergiant Binary Fraction as a Function of Metallicity in M31 and M33. ApJ 2021, 908, 87. Galaxies 2025, 13, 81 13 of 15

    2021

  50. [58]

    The Samples and Binary Fractions of Red Supergiant in M31 and M33 by the HST

    Dai, M.; Wang, S.; Jiang, B.; Li, Y. The Samples and Binary Fractions of Red Supergiant in M31 and M33 by the HST. arXiv e-prints 2025, p. arXiv:2505.24559

    2025 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Red supergiant stars in binary systems

    Patrick, L.R.; Thilker, D.; Lennon, D.J.; Bianchi, L.; Schootemeijer, A.; Dorda, R.; Langer, N.; Negueruela, I. Red supergiant stars in binary systems. I. Identification and characterization in the small magellanic cloud from the UVIT ultraviolet imaging survey. MNRAS 2022, 513, 5847

    2022

  52. [60]

    Fundamental properties and atmospheric structure of the red supergiant VY Canis Majoris based on VLTI/AMBER spectro-interferometry

    Wittkowski, M.; Hauschildt, P .H.; Arroyo-Torres, B.; Marcaide, J.M. Fundamental properties and atmospheric structure of the red supergiant VY Canis Majoris based on VLTI/AMBER spectro-interferometry. A&A 2012, 540, L12, [arXiv:astro-ph.SR/1203.5194]. https://doi.org/10.1051/0...

    2012 arXiv

  53. [61]

    The VLT-FLAMES Tarantula Survey

    Britavskiy, N.; Lennon, D.J.; Patrick, L.R.; Evans, C.J.; Herrero, A.; Langer, N.; van Loon, J.T.; Clark, J.S.; Schneider, F.R.N.; Almeida, L.A.; et al. The VLT-FLAMES Tarantula Survey. XXX. Red stragglers in the clusters Hodge 301 and SL 639. A&A 2019, 624, A128

    2019

  54. [62]

    A merger model for SN 1987A

    Podsiadlowski, P .; Joss, P .C.; Rappaport, S. A merger model for SN 1987A. A&A 1990, 227, L9

    1990

  55. [63]

    The diverse lives of progenitors of hydrogen-rich core-collapse supernovae: the role of binary interaction

    Zapartas, E.; de Mink, S.E.; Justham, S.; Smith, N.; de Koter, A.; Renzo, M.; Arcavi, I.; Farmer, R.; Götberg, Y.; Toonen, S. The diverse lives of progenitors of hydrogen-rich core-collapse supernovae: the role of binary interaction. A&A 2019, 631, A5

    2019

  56. [64]

    Pre-supernova evolution and final fate of stellar mergers and accretors of binary mass transfer

    Schneider, F.R.N.; Podsiadlowski, P .; Laplace, E. Pre-supernova evolution and final fate of stellar mergers and accretors of binary mass transfer. A&A 2024, 686, A45

    2024

  57. [65]

    Massive runaway and walkaway stars

    Renzo, M.; Zapartas, E.; de Mink, S.E.; Götberg, Y.; Justham, S.; Farmer, R.J.; Izzard, R.G.; Toonen, S.; Sana, H. Massive runaway and walkaway stars. A study of the kinematical imprints of the physical processes governing the evolution and explosion of their binary progenitor...

    2019

  58. [66]

    A New VLA-Hipparcos Distance to Betelgeuse and its Implications

    Harper, G.M.; Brown, A.; Guinan, E.F. A New VLA-Hipparcos Distance to Betelgeuse and its Implications. AJ 2008, 135, 1430

    2008

  59. [67]

    A Catalog of Galactic Multiple Systems with a Red Supergiant and a B Star

    Pantaleoni González, M.; Maíz Apellániz, J.; Barbá, R.H.; Negueruela, I. A Catalog of Galactic Multiple Systems with a Red Supergiant and a B Star. Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society 2020, 4, 12

    2020

  60. [68]

    The height of convective plumes in the red supergiant µ Cep

    López Ariste, A.; Wavasseur, M.; Mathias, P .; Lèbre, A.; Tessore, B.; Georgiev, S. The height of convective plumes in the red supergiant µ Cep. A&A 2023, 670, A62

    2023

  61. [69]

    The Asymmetric Nebula Surrounding the Extreme Red Supergiant VY Canis Majoris

    Smith, N.; Humphreys, R.M.; Davidson, K.; Gehrz, R.D.; Schuster, M.T.; Krautter, J. The Asymmetric Nebula Surrounding the Extreme Red Supergiant VY Canis Majoris. AJ 2001, 121, 1111

    2001

  62. [70]

    A dusty veil shading Betelgeuse during its Great Dimming

    Montargès, M.; Cannon, E.; Lagadec, E.; de Koter, A.; Kervella, P .; Sanchez-Bermudez, J.; Paladini, C.; Cantalloube, F.; Decin, L.; Scicluna, P .; et al. A dusty veil shading Betelgeuse during its Great Dimming. Nature 2021, 594, 365

    2021

  63. [71]

    Episodic Gaseous Outflows and Mass Loss from Red Supergiants

    Humphreys, R.M.; Jones, T.J. Episodic Gaseous Outflows and Mass Loss from Red Supergiants. AJ 2022, 163, 103

    2022

  64. [72]

    The mass-loss rates of red supergiants and the de Jager prescription

    Mauron, N.; Josselin, E. The mass-loss rates of red supergiants and the de Jager prescription. A&A 2011, 526, A156

    2011

  65. [73]

    The evolution of red supergiant mass-loss rates

    Beasor, E.R.; Davies, B. The evolution of red supergiant mass-loss rates. MNRAS 2018, 475, 55

    2018

  66. [74]

    Exploring the Mass-loss Histories of the Red Supergiants

    Humphreys, R.M.; Helmel, G.; Jones, T.J.; Gordon, M.S. Exploring the Mass-loss Histories of the Red Supergiants. AJ 2020, 160, 145

    2020

  67. [75]

    Evolved massive stars at low-metallicity

    Yang, M.; Bonanos, A.Z.; Jiang, B.; Zapartas, E.; Gao, J.; Ren, Y.; Lam, M.I.; Wang, T.; Maravelias, G.; Gavras, P .; et al. Evolved massive stars at low-metallicity. V . Mass-loss rate of red supergiant stars in the Small Magellanic Cloud.A&A 2023, 676, A84

    2023

  68. [76]

    Establishing a mass-loss rate relation for red supergiants in the Large Magellanic Cloud

    Antoniadis, K.; Bonanos, A.Z.; de Wit, S.; Zapartas, E.; Munoz-Sanchez, G.; Maravelias, G. Establishing a mass-loss rate relation for red supergiants in the Large Magellanic Cloud. A&A 2024, 686, A88

    2024

  69. [77]

    Constraining red supergiant mass-loss prescriptions through supernova radio properties

    Moriya, T.J. Constraining red supergiant mass-loss prescriptions through supernova radio properties. MNRAS 2021, 503, L28

    2021

  70. [78]

    The Time-averaged Mass-loss Rates of Red Supergiants as Revealed by Their Luminosity Functions in M31 and M33

    Massey, P .; Neugent, K.F.; Ekström, S.; Georgy, C.; Meynet, G. The Time-averaged Mass-loss Rates of Red Supergiants as Revealed by Their Luminosity Functions in M31 and M33. ApJ 2023, 942, 69

    2023

  71. [79]

    Investigating the metallicity dependence of the mass-loss rate relation of red supergiants

    Antoniadis, K.; Zapartas, E.; Bonanos, A.Z.; Maravelias, G.; Vlassis, S.; Munoz-Sanchez, G.; Nally, C.; Meixner, M.; Jones, O.C.; Lenkic, L.; et al. Investigating the metallicity dependence of the mass-loss rate relation of red supergiants. arXiv e-prints 2025, p. arXiv:2503.05876

    2025

  72. [80]

    The effect of mass loss in models of red supergiants in the Small Magellanic Cloud

    Zapartas, E.; de Wit, S.; Antoniadis, K.; Muñoz-Sanchez, G.; Souropanis, D.; Bonanos, A.Z.; Maravelias, G.; Kovlakas, K.; Kruckow, M.U.; Fragos, T.; et al. The effect of mass loss in models of red supergiants in the Small Magellanic Cloud. A&A 2025, 697, A167. https://doi.org/...

    2025 doi

  73. [81]

    A Model for Eruptive Mass Loss in Massive Stars

    Cheng, S.J.; Goldberg, J.A.; Cantiello, M.; Bauer, E.B.; Renzo, M.; Conroy, C. A Model for Eruptive Mass Loss in Massive Stars. ApJ 2024, 974, 270, [arXiv:astro-ph.SR/2405.12274]. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad701e

    2024 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Episodic mass loss in the very luminous red supergiant [W60] B90 in the Large Magellanic Cloud

    Munoz-Sanchez, G.; de Wit, S.; Bonanos, A.Z.; Antoniadis, K.; Boutsia, K.; Boumis, P .; Christodoulou, E.; Kalitsounaki, M.; Udalski, A. Episodic mass loss in the very luminous red supergiant [W60] B90 in the Large Magellanic Cloud. A&A 2024, 690, A99

    2024

  75. [83]

    The dramatic transition of the extreme Red Supergiant WOH G64 to a Yellow Hypergiant

    Munoz-Sanchez, G.; Kalitsounaki, M.; de Wit, S.; Antoniadis, K.; Bonanos, A.Z.; Zapartas, E.; Boutsia, K.; Christodoulou, E.; Maravelias, G.; Soszynski, I.; et al. The dramatic transition of the extreme Red Supergiant WOH G64 to a Yellow Hypergiant. arXiv e-prints 2024, p. arX...

    2024

  76. [84]

    Measuring the Progenitor Masses and Dense Circumstellar Material of Type II Supernovae

    Morozova, V .; Piro, A.L.; Valenti, S. Measuring the Progenitor Masses and Dense Circumstellar Material of Type II Supernovae. ApJ 2018, 858, 15

    2018

  77. [85]

    Explosion imminent: the appearance of red supergiants at the point of core-collapse

    Davies, B.; Plez, B.; Petrault, M. Explosion imminent: the appearance of red supergiants at the point of core-collapse. MNRAS 2022, 517, 1483. Galaxies 2025, 13, 81 14 of 15

    2022

  78. [86]

    From Discovery to the First Month of the Type II Supernova 2023ixf: High and Variable Mass Loss in the Final Year before Explosion

    Hiramatsu, D.; Tsuna, D.; Berger, E.; Itagaki, K.; Goldberg, J.A.; Gomez, S.; Kishalay De.; Hosseinzadeh, G.; Bostroem, K.A.; Brown, P .J.; et al. From Discovery to the First Month of the Type II Supernova 2023ixf: High and Variable Mass Loss in the Final Year before Explosion...

    2023

  79. [87]

    PTF11iqb: cool supergiant mass-loss that bridges the gap between Type IIn and normal supernovae

    Smith, N.; Mauerhan, J.C.; Cenko, S.B.; Kasliwal, M.M.; Silverman, J.M.; Filippenko, A.V .; Gal-Yam, A.; Clubb, K.I.; Graham, M.L.; Leonard, D.C.; et al. PTF11iqb: cool supergiant mass-loss that bridges the gap between Type IIn and normal supernovae. MNRAS 2015, 449, 1876

    2015

  80. [88]

    SN 2023ixf in Messier 101: A Variable Red Supergiant as the Progenitor Candidate to a Type II Supernova

    Kilpatrick, C.D.; Foley, R.J.; Jacobson-Galán, W.V .; Piro, A.L.; Smartt, S.J.; Drout, M.R.; Gagliano, A.; Gall, C.; Hjorth, J.; Jones, D.O.; et al. SN 2023ixf in Messier 101: A Variable Red Supergiant as the Progenitor Candidate to a Type II Supernova. ApJL 2023, 952, L23, [a...

    2023 arXiv

  81. [89]

    The Red Supergiant Progenitor of Type II Supernova 2024ggi

    Xiang, D.; Mo, J.; Wang, X.; Wang, L.; Zhang, J.; Lin, H.; Chen, L.; Song, C.; Liu, L.D.; Wang, Z.; et al. The Red Supergiant Progenitor of Type II Supernova 2024ggi. ApJL 2024, 969, L15, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2405.07699]. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ad54b3

    2024 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Absolute Magnitudes of Cepheids

    Sandage, A.; Tammann, G.A. Absolute Magnitudes of Cepheids. III. Amplitude as a Function of Position in the Instability Strip: a Period-Luminosity Relation. ApJ 1971, 167, 293

    1971

  83. [91]

    Stellar Pulsations Across The HR Diagram: Part 1

    Gautschy, A.; Saio, H. Stellar Pulsations Across The HR Diagram: Part 1. ARA&A 1995, 33, 75

    1995

  84. [92]

    Classical Cepheid Pulsation Models

    Bono, G.; Marconi, M.; Stellingwerf, R.F. Classical Cepheid Pulsation Models. I. Physical Structure. ApJS 1999, 122, 167

    1999

  85. [93]

    Stellar Structure and Evolution; Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York., 1990

    Kippenhahn, R.; Weigert, A. Stellar Structure and Evolution; Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York., 1990

    1990

  86. [94]

    Stars with Central Helium Burning and the Occurrence of Loops in the H-R Diagram

    Lauterborn, D.; Refsdal, S.; Weigert, A. Stars with Central Helium Burning and the Occurrence of Loops in the H-R Diagram. A&A 1971, 10, 97

    1971

  87. [95]

    Evolutionary aspects of the Cepheid stage

    Fricke, K.J.; Strittmatter, P .A. Evolutionary aspects of the Cepheid stage. MNRAS 1972, 156, 129

    1972

  88. [96]

    The hydrogen profile, previous mixing, and loops in the H-R diagram during core helium burning

    Schlesinger, B.M. The hydrogen profile, previous mixing, and loops in the H-R diagram during core helium burning. ApJ 1977, 212, 507–512

    1977

  89. [97]

    On the blue loops of intermediate-mass stars

    Walmswell, J.J.; Tout, C.A.; Eldridge, J.J. On the blue loops of intermediate-mass stars. MNRAS 2015, 447, 2951

    2015

  90. [98]

    New PARSEC evolutionary tracks of massive stars at low metallicity: testing canonical stellar evolution in nearby star-forming dwarf galaxies

    Tang, J.; Bressan, A.; Rosenfield, P .; Slemer, A.; Marigo, P .; Girardi, L.; Bianchi, L. New PARSEC evolutionary tracks of massive stars at low metallicity: testing canonical stellar evolution in nearby star-forming dwarf galaxies. MNRAS 2014, 445, 4287

    2014

  91. [99]

    The evolutionary properties of the blue loop under the influence of rapid rotation and low metallicity

    Zhao, L.; Song, H.; Meynet, G.; Maeder, A.; Ekström, S.; Zhang, R.; Qin, Y.; Qi, S.; Zhan, Q. The evolutionary properties of the blue loop under the influence of rapid rotation and low metallicity. A&A 2023, 674, A92

    2023

  92. [100]

    Mass loss rates in the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram

    de Jager, C.; Nieuwenhuijzen, H.; van der Hucht, K.A. Mass loss rates in the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram. A&AS 1988, 72, 259–289

    1988

  93. [101]

    A new mass-loss rate prescription for red supergiants

    Beasor, E.R.; Davies, B.; Smith, N.; van Loon, J.T.; Gehrz, R.D.; Figer, D.F. A new mass-loss rate prescription for red supergiants. MNRAS 2020, 492, 5994–6006, [arXiv:astro-ph.SR/2001.07222]. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa255

    2020 arXiv

  94. [102]

    An empirical formula for the mass-loss rates of dust-enshrouded red supergiants and oxygen-rich Asymptotic Giant Branch stars

    van Loon, J.T.; Cioni, M.R.L.; Zijlstra, A.A.; Loup, C. An empirical formula for the mass-loss rates of dust-enshrouded red supergiants and oxygen-rich Asymptotic Giant Branch stars. A&A 2005, 438, 273–289

    2005

  95. [103]

    Impact of mass-loss on the evolution and pre-supernova properties of red supergiants

    Meynet, G.; Chomienne, V .; Ekström, S.; Georgy, C.; Granada, A.; Groh, J.; Maeder, A.; Eggenberger, P .; Levesque, E.; Massey, P . Impact of mass-loss on the evolution and pre-supernova properties of red supergiants. A&A 2015, 575, A60

    2015

  96. [104]

    Sequences of Inhomogeneous Models for Helium-Burning Stars

    Giannone, P . Sequences of Inhomogeneous Models for Helium-Burning Stars. Zeitschrift für Astrophysik 1967, 65, 226

    1967

  97. [105]

    Yellow supergiants as supernova progenitors: an indication of strong mass loss for red supergiants? A&A 2012, 538, L8

    Georgy, C. Yellow supergiants as supernova progenitors: an indication of strong mass loss for red supergiants? A&A 2012, 538, L8

    2012

  98. [106]

    The Impact of Realistic Red Supergiant Mass Loss on Stellar Evolution

    Beasor, E.R.; Davies, B.; Smith, N. The Impact of Realistic Red Supergiant Mass Loss on Stellar Evolution. ApJ 2021, 922, 55, [arXiv:astro-ph.SR/2109.03239]. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac2574

    2021 arXiv

  99. [107]

    Mass Limits For Black Hole Formation

    Fryer, C.L. Mass Limits For Black Hole Formation. ApJ 1999, 522, 413

    1999

  100. [108]

    Grids of stellar models with rotation

    Georgy, C.; Ekström, S.; Meynet, G.; Massey, P .; Levesque, E.M.; Hirschi, R.; Eggenberger, P .; Maeder, A. Grids of stellar models with rotation. II. WR populations and supernovae/GRB progenitors at Z = 0.014. A&A 2012, 542, A29

    2012

  101. [109]

    The death of massive stars - I

    Smartt, S.J.; Eldridge, J.J.; Crockett, R.M.; Maund, J.R. The death of massive stars - I. Observational constraints on the progenitors of Type II-P supernovae. MNRAS 2009, 395, 1409–1437

    2009

  102. [110]

    Observational Constraints on the Progenitors of Core-Collapse Supernovae: The Case for Missing High-Mass Stars

    Smartt, S.J. Observational Constraints on the Progenitors of Core-Collapse Supernovae: The Case for Missing High-Mass Stars. P ASA2015, 32, e016

  103. [111]

    A Survey About Nothing: Monitoring a Million Supergiants for Failed Supernovae

    Kochanek, C.S.; Beacom, J.F.; Kistler, M.D.; Prieto, J.L.; Stanek, K.Z.; Thompson, T.A.; Yüksel, H. A Survey About Nothing: Monitoring a Million Supergiants for Failed Supernovae. ApJ 2008, 684, 1336

    2008

  104. [112]

    Very Low Energy Supernovae from Neutrino Mass Loss

    Lovegrove, E.; Woosley, S.E. Very Low Energy Supernovae from Neutrino Mass Loss. ApJ 2013, 769, 109

    2013

  105. [113]

    Gone without a bang: an archival HST survey for disappearing massive stars

    Reynolds, T.M.; Fraser, M.; Gilmore, G. Gone without a bang: an archival HST survey for disappearing massive stars. MNRAS 2015, 453, 2885

    2015

  106. [114]

    The search for failed supernovae with the Large Binocular Telescope: first candidates

    Gerke, J.R.; Kochanek, C.S.; Stanek, K.Z. The search for failed supernovae with the Large Binocular Telescope: first candidates. MNRAS 2015, 450, 3289

    2015

  107. [115]

    Constraints on core collapse from the black hole mass function

    Kochanek, C.S. Constraints on core collapse from the black hole mass function. MNRAS 2015, 446, 1213

    2015

  108. [116]

    ’On the red supergiant problem’: a rebuttal, and a consensus on the upper mass cut-off for II-P progenitors

    Davies, B.; Beasor, E.R. ’On the red supergiant problem’: a rebuttal, and a consensus on the upper mass cut-off for II-P progenitors. MNRAS 2020, 496, L142–L146, [arXiv:astro-ph.SR/2005.13855]. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slaa102

    2020 arXiv

  109. [117]

    The uncertain masses of progenitors of core-collapse supernovae and direct- collapse black holes

    Farrell, E.J.; Groh, J.H.; Meynet, G.; Eldridge, J.J. The uncertain masses of progenitors of core-collapse supernovae and direct- collapse black holes. MNRAS 2020, 494, L53. Galaxies 2025, 13, 81 15 of 15

    2020

  110. [118]

    Evolution of blue supergiants and α Cygni variables: puzzling CNO surface abundances

    Saio, H.; Georgy, C.; Meynet, G. Evolution of blue supergiants and α Cygni variables: puzzling CNO surface abundances. MNRAS 2013, 433, 1246–1257

    2013

  111. [119]

    The puzzle of the CNO abundances of α Cygni variables resolved by the Ledoux criterion

    Georgy, C.; Saio, H.; Meynet, G. The puzzle of the CNO abundances of α Cygni variables resolved by the Ledoux criterion. MNRAS 2014, 439, L6–L10

    2014

  112. [120]

    Observed fractions of core-collapse supernova types and initial masses of their single and binary progenitor stars

    Smith, N.; Li, W.; Filippenko, A.V .; Chornock, R. Observed fractions of core-collapse supernova types and initial masses of their single and binary progenitor stars. MNRAS 2011, 412, 1522–1538, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1006.3899]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365 -2966.2011.17229.x. ...

    2011 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.