Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 12 minor 111 references

The Red and Yellow Hypergiants

T0 review · 2 major / 12 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This review argues that hypergiant spectral-type changes are episodic mass-loss events that create cool pseudo-photospheres, and that many yellow hypergiants are post-red-supergiant stars.

desk verdict A useful, honest review of red and yellow hypergiants whose main interpretive step is clearly labeled as a suggestion but still bears more weight than the evidence supports. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.15962 v1 pith:UUERUBH3 submitted 2025-07-21 astro-ph.SR

Terry Jones This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SR
keywords yellowhypergiantsredsupergiantspost-redsupergiantevolutionpseudo-photosphereepisodicmasslossHumphreys-Davidsonlimitcircumstellarejectamassivestar
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that red and yellow hypergiants form a distinct class of the most luminous cool stars, sitting near the empirical luminosity ceiling for cool stars, and that their defining behavior is episodic, extreme mass loss rather than steady evolution. It assembles evidence, especially recent spectroscopic transitions in WOH G64, Var A, and ρ Cas, that apparent changes in spectral type can happen in years to decades, far too fast for nuclear evolution, and interprets them as an optically thick wind forming a cooler pseudo-photosphere. The paper's central thesis is that many yellow hypergiants are immediate successors to the most luminous red supergiants, caught mid-transition back to higher temperatures, and that what looks like a red supergiant state may often be a mass-loss event. A sympathetic reader should care because this recasts interpretations of cool supergiant populations, their mass-loss histories, and which progenitors explode as supernovae.

What carries the argument

The pseudo-photosphere: an optically thick, cool wind that forms outside the true stellar surface during a high mass-loss episode and mimics a red supergiant photosphere. It is the mechanism that lets the paper explain spectral-type reversals (yellow to red and back) on timescales of years to decades. The supporting machinery is the Humphreys-Davidson limit as the evolutionary context, plus SED fitting of dusty ejecta and resolved imaging of knots, arcs, and bipolar outflows that record the mass-loss history.

What would settle it

Make high-angular-resolution infrared interferometric observations of WOH G64 (or a similar post-eruption star) during a cool M-type episode. If the near-infrared continuum comes from a compact, warm photosphere surrounded by an extended cooler molecular and dust layer whose opacity creates the TiO spectrum, the pseudo-photosphere picture is confirmed; if the stellar radius and effective temperature measured from the continuum are genuinely those of a cool giant, the picture fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The review sets out to establish that the red and yellow hypergiants are a coherent group of the most luminous cool stars, with bolometric luminosities above $\log(L/L_\odot)\approx 5.4$ and effective temperatures below 8000 K, clustered just below the empirical luminosity ceiling for such stars. It argues that their defining property is not the ordinary, quasi-steady wind seen in normal red supergiants but extreme, episodic mass loss, including discrete ejections of roughly $10^{-2}\,M_\odot$ on timescales of order a century. The central interpretive claim is that many apparent spectral-type changes are not evolutionary: during a high mass-loss episode an optically thick wind forms a cooler 'pseudo-photosphere' whose M-type spectrum masks the underlying warmer star. On this reading, ρ Cas's three recorded outbursts, Var A's four-decade M-type state, and the recently observed red-to-yellow transition of WOH G64 are all manifestations of a single mechanism. The paper further argues that many yellow hypergiants are immediate successors of the most luminous red supergiants, currently on a blueward evolutionary loop, and that the fastest and most massive of them, such as IRC+10420, may be the immediate pre-supernova state of the most massive stars that still become red supergiants.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that an M-type appearance during these events is an opaque wind, not the true stellar surface; if the M-type state is a genuine photosphere, then WOH G64's transition does not demonstrate a post-red-supergiant yellow state.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the pseudo-photosphere picture is right, a star classified as an M-type red hypergiant may actually be a yellow hypergiant shrouded in its own ejected wind, so population counts of true red supergiants need revisiting.
  • The three documented transitions (ρ Cas, Var A, WOH G64) imply that massive stars can swing between yellow and red states on human timescales, and monitoring campaigns should catch more such events.
  • Post-RSG yellow hypergiants with heavy mass loss, like IRC+10420, are plausible immediate precursors to some core-collapse supernovae, and their bipolar ejecta could be the ring structures seen around SN 1987A.
  • If the most massive red supergiants skip Type II-P explosions, their absence as detected progenitors is explained without invoking a dust bias.
  • Discrete outflows ejecting roughly $10^{-2}$ solar masses per event over about 100-year timescales can dominate the total mass budget of the most extreme cool supergiants.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension: measure the apparent stellar radius at near-infrared wavelengths during a cool episode; a compact warm photosphere inside a larger cool molecular layer would support the pseudo-photosphere picture, while a genuinely enlarged cool surface would refute it.
  • The review leaves implicit that if pseudo-photospheres are common, M-type classifications alone may overcount true red supergiants, because some 'M' states are yellow hypergiants hidden inside their own ejecta.
  • One could look for past warm states of WOH G64 in archival photographic plates; finding an earlier yellow phase would strengthen the claim that the current red state was an eruption, not the star's normal state.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 12 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a review of the observational properties, evolution, and mass-loss behavior of red and yellow hypergiants. The author proposes that the rapid spectral-type changes observed in these stars, particularly in rho Cas, Var A, and WOH G64, arise from episodic mass-loss events that form a pseudo-photosphere rather than from true stellar evolution. The paper also argues that many yellow hypergiants are immediate successors to the most luminous red supergiants, using circumstellar dust and emission-line evidence, and compiles a representative table of hypergiants with their positions on the HR diagram. It discusses recent high-resolution imaging, interferometric, and maser observations, and critically summarizes the uncertain energy source for episodic outflows.

Significance. If the pseudo-photosphere interpretation is correct, the paper offers a unified explanation for the rapid spectral variability of the most luminous cool stars and a framework for understanding post-red-supergiant evolution. It is a useful synthesis of a broad observational literature, including HST and ALMA imaging, VLBI astrometry, and long-term photometric and spectroscopic monitoring. The paper is honest about open questions, explicitly labels its more speculative suggestions, and identifies a concrete test (archival plate material for WOH G64). These strengths make it a valuable contribution to the special issue, provided the central hypothesis is presented with the appropriate caveats.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3] The discussion of WOH G64's recent transition from M-type to yellow hypergiant is presented as evidence for the pseudo-photosphere mechanism, but the paper does not demonstrate that the M-type state was an optically thick wind rather than a true photosphere. The text states that 'evidence for a warmer prior state would require examination of the earlier plate material [92],' yet then asserts 'We suggest that WHO-G64 is similar to Var A... producing a pseudo-photosphere with a cooler M type spectrum.' Since the abstract generalizes that spectral changes are 'probably due to the formation of a pseudo photopsphere,' this unsupported suggestion becomes load-bearing. Please either examine the archival plates or explicitly label the WOH G64 interpretation as tentative in the abstract and summary, and discuss the alternative that the red state was a genuine photosphere.
  2. [Abstract and Section 1] The term 'pseudo-photosphere' is central to the paper's thesis, but it is never defined or physically justified. The abstract states that spectral changes are 'probably due to the formation of a pseudo photopsphere during a high mass-loss episode,' yet the paper does not explain what a pseudo-photosphere is, how it differs from a true photosphere, or under what conditions an optically thick wind can mimic a cool stellar surface. This is a load-bearing concept for the review; please add a definition and a brief discussion of the physical mechanism, with references to the relevant literature on pseudo-photospheres in other contexts (e.g., LBVs or novae).
minor comments (12)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'pseudo photopsphere' should be 'pseudo-photosphere.'
  2. [Section 2.1] The phrase 'structure structure' is a duplicate; it should be 'structure.'
  3. [Section 2.3] The phrase 'he VLT/AMBER' should be 'the VLT/AMBER.'
  4. [Section 2.3] The word 'hyperegiants' should be 'hypergiants.'
  5. [Section 2.4] The word 'tmeperatures' should be 'temperatures.'
  6. [Section 3] The manuscript uses 'WHO G64' and 'WHO-G64' inconsistently; the correct designation, as in reference [27], is 'WOH G64.'
  7. [Section 3] The range '1985–11986' should be '1985–1986.'
  8. [Section 3] The designation 'IRC +10240' should be 'IRC +10420.'
  9. [Section 3] The phrase 'sill visually faint' should be 'still visually faint.'
  10. [Section 2.2] The expression 'L⊙ ∼ 3 × 105' appears without a unit for luminosity; it should read 'L ≈ 3 × 10^5 L⊙.'
  11. [Throughout] The in-text mentions of 'the review by Ekström and Gregory,' 'the review by Van Loon,' 'the review by Wittkowski,' 'the review by Dupree & Montarges,' and 'the review by Van Dyk' are not accompanied by citations; if these are separate contributions to the special issue, please add explicit cross-references.
  12. [References] Reference [11] lists the year as '20005'; this should be '2005.'

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper is a review whose interpretive claims are explicitly labeled suggestions and rest on external observations, not on self-referential definitions or fitted inputs.

full rationale

This is a review paper without a quantitative derivation chain, fitted parameters, or a uniqueness theorem, so the main circularity hazards are absent. The central interpretive step concerning WOH G64 is explicitly presented as a suggestion: 'We suggest that WHO-G64 is similar to Var A with a normal or quiescent state as a yellow hypergiant, and a probable post-RSG, that undergoes large mass-loss events producing a pseudo-photosphere with a cooler M type spectrum.' This is not a prediction derived from a fitted quantity; it is an interpretation of externally cited observations (Munoz-Sanchez et al. 2024 for the spectral transition; Humphreys et al. 2006 for Var A's behavior). The paper also honestly flags the limitation: 'Evidence for a warmer prior state would require examination of the earlier plate material.' The frequent self-citations (e.g., Jones et al. 1993, Shenoy et al. 2016, Humphreys et al. 2022) point to prior observational studies and do not reduce an argument to an unverified self-referential claim. No equation in the paper is equivalent to an input by construction, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Thus the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review rests on accepted spectral classification, published evolutionary tracks, and the pseudo-photosphere interpretation of episodic mass loss. One hand-chosen luminosity and temperature threshold defines the class. No new entities, particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Hypergiant selection threshold = Log(Mbol) = 5.4 and Teff < 8000 K
    The review defines its sample by this hand-chosen threshold, following de Jager and Keenan, rather than deriving it from data. It sets the scope of Table 1 and the discussion but is not fitted to a specific measurement.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption MK luminosity classes and absolute magnitude calibrations identify hypergiants reliably.
    Section 1 selects stars using luminosity class Ia0+ and absolute visual magnitude thresholds from historical and cited work without re-deriving the calibration.
  • domain assumption Published evolutionary tracks for 20 to 60 solar mass, non-rotating, solar metallicity stars correctly describe post-RSG blue loops.
    Section 2.2 and Figure 4 use Ekström et al. 2012 tracks to infer progenitor masses and the post-RSG crossing timescale for hypergiants.
  • domain assumption An optically thick episodic wind can create a pseudo-photosphere whose spectrum mimics a cooler star.
    Sections 2.1 and 3 use this to interpret spectral transitions in Var A, rho Cas, and WOH G64 as mass-loss events rather than true evolutionary changes.
  • domain assumption Magnetic field strengths measured in circumstellar masers and dust polarization can be extrapolated back to the stellar surface.
    Section 2.4 extrapolates fields to the photosphere to support a speculative CME-like mass-loss mechanism; this is not central to the classification claims but underlies the discussion.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Red and Yellow Hypergiants." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UUERUBH3

@misc{pith2026250715962,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Red and Yellow Hypergiants},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UUERUBH3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.15962}
}
read the original abstract

The red and yellow hypergiants are a rare and important phase in the evolution of the most massive stars that can reach the cool part of the HR Diagram. The hypergiant phase is commonly characterized by high, often episodic mass-loss rates and significant changes in spectral type, probably due to the formation of a pseudo photopsphere during a high mass-loss episode. Many of the yellow hypergiants are the immediate successors to the most luminous red supergiants, and often show evidence in their dusty, circumstellar envelopes from past red supergiant activity. In this paper we review the yellow and red hypergiants with an emphasis on how they differ from more normal red supergiants.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.15962 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Left: HST multiwavelength color image of VY CMa at optical wavelengths [10]. Right: HST image of IRC +10420 at optical wavelengths [13] [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Left: {Proposed geometry of the collimated molecular outflows in NML Cyg, projected onto the plane of the sky, superimposed over the 11 µm and HST images [15]. White indicates the molecular outflow with the blue arrow designating blueshifted emission and the red arrow indicating redshifted emission. Right: Spectrum of SO2. The water maser emission spectrum is shown below with the blueshifted (blue), centeral (green)… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Spectra of warm hypergiants in M33, including Var A [21]. Several spectral features that help identify hypergiants are shown [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: HR Diagram with evolutionary tracks for 20 to 60 M⊙ main sequence progenitor masses with Solar metalicity and no rotation [22]. For clarity, the tracks have been truncated after the end of the first ‘blue loop’ back to hotter temperatures. The grey dashed line indicate…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The SED of IRC +10420 on the left and the mass-loss model used to fit the data. Adapted from [7] [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Imaging polarimetry of IRC +10420 at 2.2 µm. (a): Polarization half-vectors showing centro-symmetric scattering. (b): Total intensity (the center is saturated). (c): Polarized intensity showing the relatively flat surface brightness, face-on, excretion disk [101]. Inte…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

111 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [92]

    Supergiant and giant M type stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud

    Westerlund, B.E.; Olander, N.; Hedin, B. Supergiant and giant M type stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud. A&A Supp. 1981, 43, 267–295

    1981

  2. [1]

    Keenan, P . C. Luminosities of the M-Type Variables of Small Range ApJ 1942, 95, 461. https://doi.org/10.1086/144418

    work page doi:10.1086/144418 1942

  3. [2]

    Red supergiants in the Large Magellanic Cloud

    Feast, M.W.; Thackeray, A.D. Red supergiants in the Large Magellanic Cloud. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1956, 116, 587. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/116.5.587

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/116.5.587 1956

  4. [3]

    The yellow hypergiants A&A Rev

    de Jager, C. The yellow hypergiants A&A Rev. 1998, 8, 145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001590050009

    doi:10.1007/s001590050009 1998

  5. [4]

    Classification of supergiants of types G, K, and M

    Keenan, P .C. Classification of supergiants of types G, K, and M. Contrib. Kitt Peak Natl. Obs. 1971, 554, 35

    1971

  6. [5]

    ApJ 1979, 232, 409

    Humphreys, R.M.; Davidson, K. ApJ 1979, 232, 409. https://doi.org/10.1086/157301

    doi:10.1086/157301 1979

  7. [6]

    Studies of luminous stars in nearby galaxies

    Humphreys, R.M. Studies of luminous stars in nearby galaxies. I. Supergiants and O stars in the Milky Way. ApJ Supp. 1978, 38,

    1978

  8. [7]

    Searching for Cool Dust in the Mid-to-Far Infrared: The Mass-Loss Histories of the Hypergiants µ Cep, VY CMa, IRC+10420, and ρ Cas

    Shenoy, D.; Humphreys, R.M.; Jones, T.J.; et al. Searching for Cool Dust in the Mid-to-Far Infrared: The Mass-Loss Histories of the Hypergiants µ Cep, VY CMa, IRC+10420, and ρ Cas. AJ 2016, 151, 51. https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-6256/151/3/51

    doi:10.3847/0004-6256/151/3/51 2016

Show all 111 references
  1. [8]

    Luminous and Variable Stars in M31 and M33

    Gordon, M.S.; Humphreys, R.M.; Jones, T.J. Luminous and Variable Stars in M31 and M33. III. The Yellow and Red Supergiants and Post-red Supergiant Evolution. ApJ 2016, 825, 50. https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/825/1/50

    2016 doi

  2. [9]

    Thermal Emission in the Southwest Clump of VY CMa

    Gordon, M.S.; Jones, T.J.; Humphreys, R.M.; et al. Thermal Emission in the Southwest Clump of VY CMa. AJ 2019, 157, 57. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/aaf5cb

    2019 doi

  3. [10]

    The Asymmetric Nebula Surrounding the Extreme Red Supergiant Vy Canis Majoris

    Smith, N.; Humphreys, R.M.; Davidson, K.; et al. The Asymmetric Nebula Surrounding the Extreme Red Supergiant Vy Canis Majoris. AJ 2001, 121, 1111. https://doi.org/10.1086/318748

    2001 doi

  4. [11]

    High-Resolution, Long-Slit Spectroscopy of VY Canis Majoris: The Evidence for Localized High Mass Loss Events

    Humphreys, R.M.; Davidson, K.; Ruch, G.; et al. High-Resolution, Long-Slit Spectroscopy of VY Canis Majoris: The Evidence for Localized High Mass Loss Events. AJ 20005, 129, 492. https://doi.org/10.1086/426565

    doi

  5. [12]

    The Three-Dimensional Morphology of VY Canis Majoris

    Humphreys, R.M.; Helton, L.A.; Jones, T.J. The Three-Dimensional Morphology of VY Canis Majoris. I. The Kinematics of the Ejecta. AJ 2007, 133, 2716. https://doi.org/10.1086/517609

    2007 doi

  6. [13]

    HST and Infrared Images of the Circumstellar Environment of the Cool Hypergiant IRC + 10420

    Humphreys, R.M.; Smith, N.; Davidson, K.; et al. HST and Infrared Images of the Circumstellar Environment of the Cool Hypergiant IRC + 10420. AJ 1997, 114, 2778. https://doi.org/10.1086/118686

    1997 doi

  7. [14]

    The Morphology of IRC+10420’s Circumstellar Ejecta

    Tiffany, C.; Humphreys, R.M.; Jones, T.J.; et al. The Morphology of IRC+10420’s Circumstellar Ejecta. AJ 2010, 140, 339. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-6256/140/2/339

    2010 doi

  8. [15]

    Imaging the Cool Hypergiant NML Cygni’s Dusty Circumstellar Envelope with Adaptive Optics

    Schuster, M.T., Marengo, M., Hora, J.L.; et al. Imaging the Cool Hypergiant NML Cygni’s Dusty Circumstellar Envelope with Adaptive Optics. ApJ 2009, 699, 1423. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/699/2/1423

    2009 doi

  9. [16]

    Molecules and Outflows in NML Cygni: New Insights from a 1 mm Spectral Line Survey

    Singh, A.P .; Edwards, J.L.; Humphreys, R.M.; et al. Molecules and Outflows in NML Cygni: New Insights from a 1 mm Spectral Line Survey. ApJ 2021, 920, L38. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ac2c7c

    2021 doi

  10. [17]

    Multiple shell ejections on a 100 yr timescale from a massive yellow hypergiant.Orig

    Oudmaijer, R.D.; Koumpia, E. Multiple shell ejections on a 100 yr timescale from a massive yellow hypergiant.Orig. Outflows Evolved Stars 2022, 366, 132. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743921322000114

    2022 doi

  11. [18]

    Crossing the Yellow Void: Spatially Resolved Spectroscopy of the Post-Red Supergiant IRC +10420 and Its Circumstellar Ejecta

    Humphreys, R.M.; Davidson, K.; Smith, N. Crossing the Yellow Void: Spatially Resolved Spectroscopy of the Post-Red Supergiant IRC +10420 and Its Circumstellar Ejecta. AJ 2002, 124, 1026. https://doi.org/10.1086/341380

    2002 doi

  12. [19]

    High resolution spectroscopy of the post-red supergiant IRC+10420: I

    Oudmaijer, R.D. High resolution spectroscopy of the post-red supergiant IRC+10420: I. The data. A&A Supp. 1998, 129, 541. https://doi.org/10.1051/aas:1998404

    1998 doi

  13. [20]

    Exploring the Mass-loss Histories of the Red Supergiants

    Humphreys, R.M.; Helmel, G.; Jones, T.J.; et al. Exploring the Mass-loss Histories of the Red Supergiants. AJ 2020, 160, 145. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/abab15

    2020 doi

  14. [21]

    Luminous and Variable Stars in M31 and M33

    Humphreys, R.M.; Davidson, K.; Grammer, S.; et al. Luminous and Variable Stars in M31 and M33. I. The Warm Hypergiants and Post-red Supergiant Evolution. ApJ 2013, 773, 46. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/773/1/46

    2013 doi

  15. [22]

    Grids of stellar models with rotation

    Ekström, S.; Georgy, C.; Eggenberger, P .; et al. Grids of stellar models with rotation. I. Models from 0.8 to 120 Modot at solar metallicity (Z = 0.014) A&A 2012 537, A146. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201117751

    2012 doi

  16. [23]

    Red Supergiants, Yellow Hypergiants, and Post-RSG Evolution

    Gordon, M.S.; Humphreys, R.M. Red Supergiants, Yellow Hypergiants, and Post-RSG Evolution. Galaxies 2019, 7, 92. https: //doi.org/10.3390/galaxies7040092

    2019 doi

  17. [24]

    Radiation-Driven Stellar Eruptions

    Davidson, K. Radiation-Driven Stellar Eruptions. Galaxies 2020 8, 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies8010010

    2020 doi

  18. [25]

    IRC +10420: A Cool Hypergiant near the Top of the H-R Diagram

    Jones, T.J.; Humphreys, R.M.; Gehrz, R.D.; et al. IRC +10420: A Cool Hypergiant near the Top of the H-R Diagram. ApJ 1993, 411,

    1993

  19. [26]

    M33’s Variable A: A Hypergiant Star More Than 35 YEARS in Eruption

    Humphreys, R.M.; Jones, T.J.; Polomski, E.; et al. M33’s Variable A: A Hypergiant Star More Than 35 YEARS in Eruption. AJ 2006, 131, 2105. https://doi.org/10.1086/500811

    2006 doi

  20. [27]

    The dramatic transition of the extreme Red Supergiant WOH G64 to a Yellow Hypergiant

    Munoz-Sanchez, G.; Kalitsounaki, M.; de Wit, S.; et al. The dramatic transition of the extreme Red Supergiant WOH G64 to a Yellow Hypergiant. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2411.19329. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.19329

    2024 doi

  21. [28]

    The death of massive stars—I

    Smartt, S.J.; Eldridge, J.J.; Crockett, R.M.; et al. The death of massive stars—I. Observational constraints on the progenitors of Type II-P supernovae. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2009, 395, 1409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14506.x

    2009

  22. [29]

    The evolution of red supergiants to supernova in NGC 2100

    Beasor, E.R.; Davies, B. The evolution of red supergiants to supernova in NGC 2100. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2016, 463, 1269. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2054

    2016 doi

  23. [30]

    The red supergiant progenitor luminosity problem

    Beasor, E.R.; Smith, N.; Jencson, J.E. The red supergiant progenitor luminosity problem. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2410.14027. https: //doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.14027

    2024 doi arXiv

  24. [31]

    Circumstellar dust as a solution to the red supergiant supernova progenitor problem

    Walmswell, J.J.; Eldridge, J.J. Circumstellar dust as a solution to the red supergiant supernova progenitor problem. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2012, 419, 2054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19860.x. Galaxies 2025, 1, 0 13 of 15

    2012

  25. [32]

    The dusty progenitor star of the Type II supernova 2017eaw.Mon

    Kilpatrick, C.D.; Foley, R.J. The dusty progenitor star of the Type II supernova 2017eaw.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2018, 481, 2536. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty2435

    2018 doi

  26. [33]

    Discrepancies in the ages of young star clusters; evidence for mergers? MNRAS 2019, em 486, 266

    Beasor, E.R.; Davies, B.; Smith, N.; et al. Discrepancies in the ages of young star clusters; evidence for mergers? MNRAS 2019, em 486, 266. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz732

    2019 doi

  27. [34]

    The yellow hypergiant HR 5171 A: Resolving a massive interacting binary in the common envelope phase

    Chesneau, O.; Meilland, A.; Chapellier, E.; et al. The yellow hypergiant HR 5171 A: Resolving a massive interacting binary in the common envelope phase. A&A 2014, 563, A71. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201322421

    2014 doi

  28. [35]

    Hubble Space Telescope Snapshot Survey of Post-AGB Objects

    Siódmiak, N.; Meixner, M.; Ueta, T.; et al. Hubble Space Telescope Snapshot Survey of Post-AGB Objects. ApJ 2008, 677, 382. https://doi.org/10.1086/529115

    2008 doi

  29. [36]

    Optical and near-infrared observations of the Fried Egg Nebula

    Koumpia, E.; Oudmaijer, R.D.; Graham, V .; et al. Optical and near-infrared observations of the Fried Egg Nebula. Multiple shell ejections on a 100 yr timescale from a massive yellow hypergiant. A&A 2020, 635, A183. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/20 1936177

    2020 doi

  30. [37]

    MIRAC: A mid-infrared array camera for astronomy.Proc

    Hoffmann, W.F.; Fazio, G.G.; Shivanandan, K.; et al. MIRAC: A mid-infrared array camera for astronomy.Proc. SPIE 1993, 1946,

    1993

  31. [38]

    The Recent Mass Loss History of the Hypergiant RW Cep

    Jones, T.J.; Shenoy, D.; Humphreys, R. The Recent Mass Loss History of the Hypergiant RW Cep. Res. Notes Am. Astron. Soc. 2023, 7, 92. https://doi.org/10.3847/2515-5172/acd37f

    2023 doi

  32. [39]

    Adaptive Optics Imaging of VY Canis Majoris at 2–5µm with LBT/LMIRCam

    Shenoy, D.P .; Jones, T.J.; Humphreys, R.M.; et al. Adaptive Optics Imaging of VY Canis Majoris at 2–5µm with LBT/LMIRCam. AJ 2013, 146, 90. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-6256/146/4/90

    2013 doi

  33. [40]

    Investigating mass loss from RSG and AGB stars using the new VLTI-MATISSE imaging instrument

    Wittkowski, M.; Chiavassa, A.; Baron, F.; et al. Investigating mass loss from RSG and AGB stars using the new VLTI-MATISSE imaging instrument. In Proceedings of the 20.5th Cambridge Workshop on Cool Stars, Stellar Systems, and the Sun (CS20.5), Online, 2–4 March 2021; Volume 3...

    2021 doi

  34. [41]

    Imaging the innermost circumstellar environment of the red supergiant WOH G64 in the Large Magellanic Cloud

    Ohnaka, K., Hofmann, K.-H., Weigelt, G., et al. Imaging the innermost circumstellar environment of the red supergiant WOH G64 in the Large Magellanic Cloud. A&A 2024, 691, L15. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451820

    2024 doi

  35. [42]

    Large dust grains in the wind of VY Canis Majoris

    Scicluna, P .; Siebenmorgen, R.; Wesson, R.; et al. Large dust grains in the wind of VY Canis Majoris. A&A 2015, 584, L10. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201527563

    2015 doi

  36. [43]

    Fundamental properties and atmospheric structure of the red supergiant VY Canis Majoris based on VLTI/AMBER spectro-interferometry.A&A 2012, 540, L12

    Wittkowski, M.; Hauschildt, P .H.; Arroyo-Torres, B.; et al. Fundamental properties and atmospheric structure of the red supergiant VY Canis Majoris based on VLTI/AMBER spectro-interferometry.A&A 2012, 540, L12. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/2012 19126

    2012 doi

  37. [44]

    Tracing a decade of activity towards a yellow hypergiant

    Koumpia, E.; Oudmaijer, R.D.; de Wit, W.-J.; et al. Tracing a decade of activity towards a yellow hypergiant. The spectral and spatial morphology of IRC+10420 at au scales. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2022, 515, 2766. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac1998

    2022 doi

  38. [45]

    Optical Interferometry of Giants and Supergiants

    Kloppenborg, B.; van Belle, G. Optical Interferometry of Giants and Supergiants. In Giants of Eclipse: Theζ Aurigae Stars and Other Binary Systems; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; Volume 408, pp. 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09198-3_6

    2015 doi

  39. [46]

    First 2.2 micron Results From the IOTA Interferometer

    Dyck, H.M.; Benson, J.A.; Carleton, N.P .; et al. First 2.2 micron Results From the IOTA Interferometer. AJ 1995, 109, 378. https://doi.org/10.1086/117282

    1995 doi

  40. [47]

    First Surface-resolved Results with the Infrared Optical Telescope Array Imaging Interferometer: Detection of Asymmetries in Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars

    Ragland, S.; Traub, W.A.; Berger, J.-P .; et al. First Surface-resolved Results with the Infrared Optical Telescope Array Imaging Interferometer: Detection of Asymmetries in Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars. ApJ 2006, 652, 650. https://doi.org/10.1086/507453

    2006 doi

  41. [48]

    Time Evolution Images of the Hypergiant RW Cephei during the Rebrightening Phase Following the Great Dimming

    Anugu, N.; Gies, D.R.; Roettenbacher, R.M.; et al. Time Evolution Images of the Hypergiant RW Cephei during the Rebrightening Phase Following the Great Dimming. ApJ 2024, 973, L5. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ad736c

    2024 doi

  42. [49]

    Long Term Evolution of Surface Features on the Red Supergiant AZ Cyg

    Norris, R.P .; Baron, F.R.; Monnier, J.D.; et al. Long Term Evolution of Surface Features on the Red Supergiant AZ Cyg. ApJ 2021, 919, 124. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac0c7e

    2021 doi

  43. [50]

    CHARA Near-infrared Imaging of the Yellow Hypergiant Starρ Cassiopeiae: Convection Cells and Circumstellar Envelope

    Anugu, N.; Baron, F.; Monnier, J.D.; et al. CHARA Near-infrared Imaging of the Yellow Hypergiant Starρ Cassiopeiae: Convection Cells and Circumstellar Envelope. ApJ 2024, 974, 113. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad6b2b

    2024 doi

  44. [51]

    Massive dust clumps in the envelope of the red supergiant VY Canis Majoris

    Kami ´ nski, T. Massive dust clumps in the envelope of the red supergiant VY Canis Majoris. A&A 2019, 627, A114. https: //doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201935408

    2019 doi

  45. [52]

    ALMA observations of TiO 2 around VY Canis Majoris

    De Beck, E.; Vlemmings, W.; Muller, S.; et al. ALMA observations of TiO 2 around VY Canis Majoris. A&A 2015, 580, A36. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201525990

    2015 doi

  46. [53]

    ALMA Reveals Hidden Morphologies in the Molecular Envelope of VY Canis Majoris

    Singh, A.P .; Richards, A.M.S.; Humphreys, R.M.; et al. ALMA Reveals Hidden Morphologies in the Molecular Envelope of VY Canis Majoris. ApJ 2023, 954, L1. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ace7cb

    2023 doi

  47. [54]

    ALMA Compact Array observations of the Fried Egg nebula

    Wallström, S.H.J.; Lagadec, E.; Muller, S.; et al. ALMA Compact Array observations of the Fried Egg nebula. Evidence for large-scale asymmetric mass-loss from the yellow hypergiant IRAS 17163-3907. A&A 2017, 597, A99. https://doi.org/10.1051/00 04-6361/201628416

    2017 doi

  48. [55]

    Probing the Mass-Loss History of the Yellow Hypergiant IRC+10420.ApJ 2009, 697, 409

    Muller, S.; Lim, J.; Kwok, S.; Muthu, C. Probing the Mass-Loss History of the Yellow Hypergiant IRC+10420.ApJ 2009, 697, 409. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/697/1/409

    2009 doi

  49. [56]

    ALMA-resolved salt emission traces the chemical footprint and inner wind morphology of VY Canis Majoris

    Decin, L.; Richards, A.M.S.; Millar, T.J.; et al. ALMA-resolved salt emission traces the chemical footprint and inner wind morphology of VY Canis Majoris. A&A 2016, 592, A76. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201527934

    2016 doi

  50. [57]

    Simultaneous VLBA polarimetric observations of the v = {1,2} J = 1–0 and v = 1, J = 2–1 SiO maser emission towards VY CMa: Maser morphology and pumping

    Richter, L.; Kemball, A.; Jonas, J. Simultaneous VLBA polarimetric observations of the v = {1,2} J = 1–0 and v = 1, J = 2–1 SiO maser emission towards VY CMa: Maser morphology and pumping. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2013, 436, 1708. https: //doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt1686

    2013 doi

  51. [58]

    MERLIN observations of water maser proper motions in VY Canis Majoris

    Richards, A.M.S.; Yates, J.A.; Cohen, R.J. MERLIN observations of water maser proper motions in VY Canis Majoris. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1998, 299, 319. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01386.x. Galaxies 2025, 1, 0 14 of 15

    1998

  52. [59]

    The radially expanding molecular outflow of VX Sagittarii

    Murakawa, K.; Yates, J.A.; Richards, A.M.S.; et al. The radially expanding molecular outflow of VX Sagittarii. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2003, 344, 1. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06626.x

    2003

  53. [60]

    Dense Molecular Clumps in the Envelope of the Yellow Hypergiant IRC+10420

    tat Wong, K.; Lim, J. Dense Molecular Clumps in the Envelope of the Yellow Hypergiant IRC+10420. ApJ 2017, 851, 65. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa932b

    2017 doi

  54. [61]

    Distance and Kinematics of the Red Hypergiant VY CMa: Very Long Baseline Array and Very Large Array Astrometry.ApJ 2012, 744, 23

    Zhang, B.; Reid, M.J.; Menten, K.M.; et al. Distance and Kinematics of the Red Hypergiant VY CMa: Very Long Baseline Array and Very Large Array Astrometry.ApJ 2012, 744, 23. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/744/1/23

    2012 doi

  55. [62]

    Distance to VY Canis Majoris with VERA

    Choi, Y.K.; Hirota, T.; Honma, M.; et al. Distance to VY Canis Majoris with VERA. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. 2008, 60, 1007–1012. https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj/60.5.1007

    2008 doi

  56. [63]

    Measuring the Distance of VX Sagittarii with SiO Maser Proper Motions

    Chen, X.; Shen, Z.-Q.; Xu, Y. Measuring the Distance of VX Sagittarii with SiO Maser Proper Motions. Chin. J. Astron. Astrophys. 2007, 7, 531. https://doi.org/10.1088/1009-9271/7/4/09

    2007 doi

  57. [64]

    Evolved massive stars at low-metallicity V

    Yang, M.; Bonanos, A.Z.; Jiang, B.; et al. Evolved massive stars at low-metallicity V . Mass-loss rate of red supergiant stars in the Small Magellanic Cloud. A&A 2023, 676, A84. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202244770

    2023 doi

  58. [65]

    Mass-loss Rate of Highly Evolved Stars in the Magellanic Clouds

    Wen, J.; Yang, M.; Gao, J.; et al. Mass-loss Rate of Highly Evolved Stars in the Magellanic Clouds. ApJ Supp. 2024, 275, 33. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/ad7b33

    2024 doi

  59. [66]

    ALMA observations of anisotropic dust mass loss in the inner circumstellar environment of the red supergiant VY Canis Majoris

    O’Gorman, E.; Vlemmings, W.; Richards, A.M.S.; et al. ALMA observations of anisotropic dust mass loss in the inner circumstellar environment of the red supergiant VY Canis Majoris. A&A 2015, 573, L1. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201425101

    2015 doi

  60. [67]

    The Hidden Clumps in VY CMa Uncovered by the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array

    Humphreys, R.M.; Richards, A.M.S.; Davidson, K.; et al. The Hidden Clumps in VY CMa Uncovered by the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array. AJ 2024, 167, 94. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ad1dd7

    2024 doi

  61. [68]

    OH/IR Stars in the Magellanic Clouds.ApJ 1992 397, 552

    Wood, P .R.; Whiteoak, J.B.; Hughes, S.M.G.; et al. OH/IR Stars in the Magellanic Clouds.ApJ 1992 397, 552. https://doi.org/10.1 086/171812

    1992

  62. [69]

    Instabilities in the yellow hypergiant domain

    Glatzel, W.; Kraus, M. Instabilities in the yellow hypergiant domain. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2024, 529, 4947–4957. https: //doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae861

    2024 doi

  63. [70]

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3933.2012.01264.x

    Quataert, E.; Shiode, J.Wave-driven mass loss in the last year of stellar evolution: Setting the stage for the most luminous core-collapse supernovae MNRAS 2012 423, L92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3933.2012.01264.x

    2012

  64. [71]

    A Diversity of Wave-driven Presupernova OutburstsApJ 2021, 906, 3

    Wu, S.; Fuller, J. A Diversity of Wave-driven Presupernova OutburstsApJ 2021, 906, 3. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abc87c

    2021 doi

  65. [72]

    2022, Episodic Gaseous Outflows and Mass Loss from Red Supergiants

    Humphreys, R.M.; Jones, T.J. 2022, Episodic Gaseous Outflows and Mass Loss from Red Supergiants. AJ 2022, 163, 103. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ac46ff

    2022 doi

  66. [73]

    The close circumstellar environment of Betelgeuse

    Kervella, P .; Perrin, G.; Chiavassa, A.; et al. The close circumstellar environment of Betelgeuse. II. Diffraction-limited spectro- imaging from 7.76 to 19.50 µm with VLT/VISIR. A&A 2011, 531, A117. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201116962

    2011 doi

  67. [74]

    The Great Dimming of Betelgeuse: The photosphere as revealed by tomography over the past 15 yr

    Jadlovský, D.; Granzer, T.; Weber, M.; et al. The Great Dimming of Betelgeuse: The photosphere as revealed by tomography over the past 15 yr. A&A 2024, 685, A124. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202348846

    2024 doi

  68. [75]

    Three-dimensional imaging of convective cells in the photosphere of Betelgeuse

    López Ariste, A.; Georgiev, S.; Mathias, P .; et al. Three-dimensional imaging of convective cells in the photosphere of Betelgeuse. A&A 2022, 661, A91. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202142271

    2022 doi

  69. [76]

    The Three-Dimensional Morphology of VY Canis Majoris

    Jones, T.J.; Humphreys, R.M.; Helton, L.A.; et al. The Three-Dimensional Morphology of VY Canis Majoris. II. Polarimetry and the Line-of-Sight Distribution of the Ejecta. AJ 2007 133, 2730. https://doi.org/10.1086/517610

    2007 doi

  70. [77]

    Global Energetics of Thirty-Eight Large Solar Eruptive Events

    Emslie, A.G.; Dennis, B.R.; Shih, A.Y.; et al. Global Energetics of Thirty-Eight Large Solar Eruptive Events. ApJ 2012, 759, 71. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/759/1/71

    2012 doi

  71. [78]

    Constraints on the Surface Magnetic Fields and Age of a Cool Hypergiant: Xmm-Newton X-ray Observations of VY CMa

    Montez, R.; Kastner, J.H.; Humphreys, R.M.; et al. Constraints on the Surface Magnetic Fields and Age of a Cool Hypergiant: Xmm-Newton X-ray Observations of VY CMa. ApJ 2015, 800, 4. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/800/1/4

    2015 doi

  72. [79]

    Images of Betelgeuse with VLTI/MATISSE across the Great Dimming.Mon

    Drevon, J.; Millour, F.; Cruzalèbes, P .; et al. Images of Betelgeuse with VLTI/MATISSE across the Great Dimming.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2024, 527, L88. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slad138

    2024 doi

  73. [80]

    Non-detection of Betelgeuse in X-rays

    Kashyap, V .L.; Drake, J.J.; Patnaude, D. Non-detection of Betelgeuse in X-rays. InThe Astronomer’s Telegram; SAO Astrophysics Data System: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020; p. 13501

    2020

  74. [81]

    Magnetic fields of red giants and supergiants: A review of spectropolarimetric observations

    Plachinda, S.; Butkovskaya, V .; Shulyak, D.; et al. Magnetic fields of red giants and supergiants: A review of spectropolarimetric observations. Acta Astrophys. Taurica 2022, 3, 6. https://doi.org/10.31059/aat.vol3.iss1.pp6-11

    2022 doi

  75. [82]

    Circular polarization of water masers in the circumstellar envelopes of late type stars

    Vlemmings, W.H.T.; Diamond, P .J.; van Langevelde, H.J. Circular polarization of water masers in the circumstellar envelopes of late type stars. A&A 2002, 394, 589. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20021166

    2002 doi

  76. [83]

    The magnetic field around late-type stars revealed by the circumstellar H2O masers

    Vlemmings, W.H.T.; van Langevelde, H.J.; Diamond, P .J. The magnetic field around late-type stars revealed by the circumstellar H2O masers. A&A 2005, 434, 1029. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20042488

    2005 doi

  77. [84]

    Magnetically aligned dust and SiO maser polarisation in the envelope of the red supergiant VY Canis Majoris

    Vlemmings, W.H.T.; Khouri, T.; Martí-Vidal, I.; et al. Magnetically aligned dust and SiO maser polarisation in the envelope of the red supergiant VY Canis Majoris. A&A 2017, 603, A92. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201730735

    2017 doi

  78. [85]

    Interstellar Dust Grain Alignment

    Andersson, B.-G.; Lazarian, A.; Vaillancourt, J.E. Interstellar Dust Grain Alignment. ARAA 2015, 53, 501. https://doi.org/10.114 6/annurev-astro-082214-122414

    2015

  79. [86]

    The magnetic field of Betelgeuse: A local dynamo from giant convection cells? A&A 2010, 516, L2

    Aurière, M.; Donati, J.-F.; Konstantinova-Antova, R.; et al. The magnetic field of Betelgeuse: A local dynamo from giant convection cells? A&A 2010, 516, L2. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201014925

    2010 doi

  80. [87]

    Double Lines in the Spectrum of ρ Cassiopeiae

    Bidelman, W.P .; McKellar, A. Double Lines in the Spectrum of ρ Cassiopeiae. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 1957, 69, 31. https: //doi.org/10.1086/127009

    1957 doi

  81. [88]

    Spectral variability of the supergiant rho CAS in 1985–1986.Tartu Astrofuus

    Boyarchuk, A.A.; Boyarchuk, M.E.; Petrov, P .P . Spectral variability of the supergiant rho CAS in 1985–1986.Tartu Astrofuus. Obs. Teated 1998, 92, 40. Galaxies 2025, 1, 0 15 of 15

    1985

  82. [89]

    High-Resolution Spectroscopy of the Yellow Hypergiantρ Cassiopeiae from 1993 through the Outburst of 2000–2001

    Lobel, A.; Dupree, A.K.; Stefanik, R.P .; et al. High-Resolution Spectroscopy of the Yellow Hypergiantρ Cassiopeiae from 1993 through the Outburst of 2000–2001. ApJ 2003, 583, 923. https://doi.org/10.1086/345503

    1993 doi

  83. [90]

    The Enigmatic Object Variable A in M33

    Humphreys, R.M.; Jones, T.J.; Gehrz, R.D. The Enigmatic Object Variable A in M33. AJ 1987, 94, 315. https://doi.org/10.1086/11 4473

    1987 doi

  84. [91]

    Two Supergiants in the Large Magellanic Cloud with Thick Dust Shells.ApJ 1986, 302,

    Elias, J.H.; Frogel, J.A.; Schwering, P .B.W. Two Supergiants in the Large Magellanic Cloud with Thick Dust Shells.ApJ 1986, 302,

    1986

  85. [93]

    Yellow Supergiants and Post-red Supergiant Evolution in the Large Magellanic Cloud

    Humphreys, R.M.; Jones, T.J.; Martin, J.C. Yellow Supergiants and Post-red Supergiant Evolution in the Large Magellanic Cloud. AJ 2023 166, 50. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/acdd6c

    2023 doi

  86. [94]

    The Properties of Fast Yellow Pulsating Supergiants: FYPS Point the Way to Missing Red Supergiants ApJ 2022, 940, 27–51

    Dorn-Wallenstein, T.Z.; Levesque, E.M.; Davenport, J.R.A.; et al. The Properties of Fast Yellow Pulsating Supergiants: FYPS Point the Way to Missing Red Supergiants ApJ 2022, 940, 27–51. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac79b2

    2022 doi

  87. [95]

    Short-term Variability of Evolved Massive Stars with TESS

    Dorn-Wallenstein, T.Z.; Levesque, E.M.; Neugent, K.F.; et al. Short-term Variability of Evolved Massive Stars with TESS. II. A New Class of Cool, Pulsating Supergiants. ApJ 2020, 902, 24. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abb318

    2020 doi

  88. [96]

    Mitteilungen über neuentdeckte Veränderliche Sterne

    Hoffmeister, C. Mitteilungen über neuentdeckte Veränderliche Sterne. Astron. Nachrichten 1964, 288, 49. https://doi.org/10.1002/ asna.19652880402

    1964

  89. [97]

    Photometric histories of six infrared objects and three highly reddened blue supergiants

    Gottlieb, E.W.; Liller, W. Photometric histories of six infrared objects and three highly reddened blue supergiants. ApJ 1978, 225,

    1978

  90. [98]

    IRC+10420—Another Eta Carinae?ApJ 1973, 179, L49

    Humphreys, R.M.; Strecker, D.W.; Murdock, T.L.; et al. IRC+10420—Another Eta Carinae?ApJ 1973, 179, L49. https://doi.org/10 .1086/181114

    1973

  91. [99]

    Discovery of near-infrared hydrogen line emission in the peculiar F8 hypergiant IRC +10420

    Oudmaijer, R.D.; Geballe, T.R.; Waters, L.B.F.M.; et al. Discovery of near-infrared hydrogen line emission in the peculiar F8 hypergiant IRC +10420. A&A 1994, 281, L33

    1994

  92. [100]

    Integral-Field Spectroscopy of the Post-Red Supergiant IRC +10420: Evidence for an Axisymmetric Wind

    Davies, B.; Oudmaijer, R.D.; Sahu, K.C. Integral-Field Spectroscopy of the Post-Red Supergiant IRC +10420: Evidence for an Axisymmetric Wind. ApJ 2007, 671, 2059. https://doi.org/10.1086/523692

    2007 doi

  93. [101]

    Probing Hypergiant Mass Loss with Adaptive Optics Imaging and Polarimetry in the Infrared: MMT-Pol and LMIRCam Observations of IRC +10420 and VY Canis Majoris

    Shenoy, D.P .; Jones, T.J.; Packham, C.; et al. Probing Hypergiant Mass Loss with Adaptive Optics Imaging and Polarimetry in the Infrared: MMT-Pol and LMIRCam Observations of IRC +10420 and VY Canis Majoris. AJ 2015, 150, 15. https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0004-6256/150/1/15

    2015

  94. [102]

    Deep JWST/NIRCam imaging of Supernova 1987A

    Matsuura, M.; Boyer, M.; Arendt, R.G.; et al. Deep JWST/NIRCam imaging of Supernova 1987A. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2024, 532, 3625. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae1032

    2024 doi

  95. [103]

    Velocity structure of the ring nebula around supernova 1987A

    Crotts, A.P .; Heathcote, S.R. Velocity structure of the ring nebula around supernova 1987A. Nature 1991, 350, 683. https: //doi.org/10.1038/350683a0

    1991 doi

  96. [104]

    Multiple ring nebulae around blue supergiants

    Chita, S.M.; Langer, N.; van Marle, A.J.; et al. Multiple ring nebulae around blue supergiants. A&A 2008, 488, L37. https: //doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:200810087

    2008 doi

  97. [105]

    Forming equatorial rings around dying stars.Mon

    Akashi, M.; Sabach, E.; Yogev, O.; et al. Forming equatorial rings around dying stars.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2015, 453, 2115. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv1666

    2015 doi

  98. [106]

    The Progenitor of SN 1987A P ASP1992 104, 717

    Podsiadlowski, P . The Progenitor of SN 1987A P ASP1992 104, 717. https://doi.org/10.1086/133043. Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or...

    doi

  99. [309]

    https://doi.org/10.1086/190559

    doi

  100. [323]

    https://doi.org/10.1086/172832

    doi

  101. [449]

    https://doi.org/10.1117/12.158697

    doi

  102. [488]

    https://doi.org/10.1086/156509

    doi

  103. [675]

    https://doi.org/10.1086/164028

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.