Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 90 references

Betelgeuse, the Prototypical Red Supergiant

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read Betelgeuse's Great Dimming was a surface mass ejection that broke its pulsation, and the 2100-day cycle points to a hidden companion.

desk verdict A solid, reliable review of Betelgeuse's last six years; the real problems are an unexplained 'This work' radius and a companion section that misses the convective alternative it itself raises. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.15966 v1 pith:MEAFIFJ6 submitted 2025-07-21 astro-ph.SR

classification astro-ph.SR
keywords BetelgeuseredsupergiantGreatDimmingsurfacemassejectionlongsecondaryperiodstellarcompanionlosspulsation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review assembles six years of imaging, photometry, and spectroscopy to argue that Betelgeuse's 2019–2020 Great Dimming was not a simple cooling event but a surface mass ejection: a hot plume broke through the photosphere, ejected plasma, and disrupted the star's 400-day pulsation, shifting it into an overtone. It also argues that the star's long secondary period of about 2100 days in brightness and radial velocity is best explained by a faint orbiting companion rather than by convection or non-radial pulsation. If these claims hold, Betelgeuse becomes the nearest laboratory for episodic mass loss in red supergiants, with consequences for how much mass such stars lose before exploding as supernovae.

What carries the argument

The central objects are the Surface Mass Ejection (SME) and the Long Secondary Period (LSP). The SME is the mechanism by which a convective plume breaks through the photosphere and ejects plasma, and it carries the explanation of the Great Dimming: it cools the photosphere, promotes dust formation in the line of sight, and disrupts the pulsation clock. The LSP is the about 2100-day brightness and radial-velocity cycle; the paper uses its period, amplitude, and the delay between velocity and magnitude maxima as evidence for an orbiting dusty companion, with the companion hypothesis doing the work of explaining a signal that convection and non-radial pulsation models have not explained.

What would settle it

A direct detection attempt at the predicted companion position and quadrature, or a null detection with upper limits below the predicted brightness, would settle the companion claim; a line-depth study of the 2100-day radial velocity that showed phase shifts with spectral formation height would instead indicate a surface origin.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the Great Dimming was caused by a Surface Mass Ejection (SME): hydrodynamic simulations show a hot plume rising through the convective interior, breaking through the photosphere, and spreading over the stellar surface, ejecting plasma and breaking the phase coherence of the fundamental pulsation. The observed shortening of the 400-day period after the event is read as the star ringing in an overtone. For the 2100-day periodicity, two independent analyses of photometry, radial velocity, and astrometry both conclude that Betelgeuse hosts a companion of roughly 0.6–1.2 solar masses at an orbital separation of about 1800–1850 solar radii, and the review treats this companion as the likely origin of the long secondary period.

Load-bearing premise

The companion interpretation rests on assuming that the 2100-day radial-velocity signal is true orbital motion rather than a pattern produced by large-scale convection or pulsation on the stellar surface.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the SME interpretation is right, the dimming was a mass-loss episode, not merely a surface cooling, so Betelgeuse's current mass-loss rate must be revised upward for the event.
  • The broken pulsation coherence after the dimming means the star's 400-day clock can reset, so future light curves should be modeled with mode switching rather than a single period.
  • If the 2100-day cycle is orbital, the companion's predicted position and timing can be checked with direct imaging, spectroscopy, or X-ray searches.
  • Episodic dimmings like Betelgeuse's may be common among red supergiants, so similar events in other galaxies should be interpreted as mass ejections rather than single-star anomalies.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension of the paper's claim: if the companion is confirmed, Betelgeuse would join the growing class of red supergiants whose long secondary periods are caused by binarity, and the merger-based origin for its fast rotation would become less speculative.
  • The review leaves implicit that the two ephemerides disagree by several months, so a single observation timed at the predicted quadrature could discriminate between the two orbital solutions and settle which companion model is correct.
  • If large-scale convection can mimic both rotation and orbital signals in Betelgeuse, the same confusion may affect other supergiants studied at lower angular resolution, so the 2100-day signal should be tested with line-depth-dependent radial velocities that probe different atmospheric layers.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This review article surveys the current state of knowledge of Betelgeuse, focusing on the past six years of observations. It covers the fundamental stellar parameters, the distance controversy, the rotation-velocity debate, the 2019–2020 Great Dimming and its interpretation as a surface mass ejection, the puzzling ~2100-day long secondary period and the claim that Betelgeuse may host a companion, the 2023 asteroid occultation, and the implications for other red supergiants. The review synthesizes imaging, photometry, spectroscopy, and hydrodynamic simulations, and it points to ongoing and future direct observational tests of the proposed companion.

Significance. If its synthesis holds, this will be a useful and timely reference for the Betelgeuse community and for the broader study of red supergiant variability and mass loss. The review has clear strengths: it presents a multi-wavelength narrative of the Great Dimming, it credits independent corroboration from the VLT/SPHERE imaging and Himawari-8 photometry, it honestly presents the distance and rotation controversies rather than forcing a single solution, and it identifies concrete, falsifiable observational tests for the proposed companion (HST ultraviolet spectroscopy, Chandra X-ray limits, and VLT/SPHERE imaging). The prose is generally accessible and the figure selection is effective. The main limitations are that one table row introduces an original 'This work' value without derivation, and the discussion of the companion hypothesis does not quantitatively face the surface-convection and pulsation alternative that the review itself documents.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4 and Table 2] The review presents the 2100-day long secondary period as evidence for an orbiting companion, but it does not address a degeneracy that is quantitatively relevant given the material in the same paper. With the Table 2 parameters (M_a ≈ 17.5–18 M_sun, M_b ≈ 0.6–1.17 M_sun, P ≈ 2109–2169 d), the primary radial-velocity semi-amplitude is only about 1.5–2.6 km/s, comparable to the ~2 km/s non-radial chromospheric motions reported in §2.1 and to the convective velocity fields that §2.3 ([41]) shows can mimic the ALMA rotation signature. The predicted astrometric wobble of roughly 2–3 mas is likewise comparable to the 2.4 mas 'cosmic noise' discussed in §2.2. The stability argument from [78] excludes white noise but does not by itself exclude a long-lived convective mode or non-linear pulsation, and the phase-lag argument of [59] is model-dependent. Because the abstract elevates the companion as a main conclusion of the review, Section 4 should either explain why these alternatives are specifically rejected for Betelgeuse or explicitly present the companion as one of several viable interpretations.
  2. [Table 1] The row 'Photospheric radius 1010+216/−152 R_sun' is labeled 'This work' but no derivation or error propagation is given. The input labels 'VLTI January 2019 + Hipparcos IAD + VLA + e-MERLIN' do not allow the reader to reproduce the value or to assess whether the asymmetric uncertainties correctly combine the distance and angular-diameter errors. For a review article, this row should either be removed or accompanied by a clear derivation, explicitly citing the angular-diameter measurement [18] and the distance solution [35] used in the calculation.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§2.1] The sentence 'The results from the ultraviolet are complemented by the subsequent measures of the SiO mm emission from ALMA [28] and demonstrate that the chromosphere is co-rotating with the star' is too strong in light of §2.3, where [41] shows that the ALMA velocity pattern can be reproduced by convection blurred by the beam; recommend softening to 'consistent with rotation' or moving the caveat forward.
  2. [§2.2] The phrase 'Betelgeuse never ceases to become more distant and bigger since its measured angular diameter remains constant' is informal and potentially confusing; a more precise statement would note that the distance measurements are mutually inconsistent and that the angular diameter alone cannot break the degeneracy.
  3. [§5] The single-chord occultation result reports a visible photospheric diameter of 57.26 mas, while Table 1 and [18] give 42.61 mas in the K band; the review should note that these refer to different wavelengths and limb-darkening definitions, otherwise the reader may infer an inconsistency.
  4. [§6] In the M51-DS1 sentence, 'Advanced Camera for Survey (ACS)/Wide Field Camera 3 (AFC3)' appears to conflate ACS and WFC3 and contains a typo 'AFC3'; please correct this to accurately name the instruments.
  5. [Abstract] The phrase 'massive surface mass ejection' is redundant; consider 'surface mass ejection' and provide the quantitative mass-loss estimate in the main text.
  6. [§4] The sentence 'About ten of the many different hypotheses for the LSP are scrutinized by [59]' would be more useful if the review summarized the main rejected alternatives and the reason for their rejection, rather than only presenting the favored dusty-companion hypothesis.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

Review is a synthesis; no derivation reduces to its inputs.

full rationale

This paper is a review, not a derivation: it makes no new predictions from its own fitted inputs. The Great Dimming/Surface Mass Ejection account is supported by independent observational studies [18], [26], [64], and [74] in addition to the authors' own [23], [38], and [61], so the central interpretation does not rest on a self-citation chain. The companion interpretation of the 2100-day long secondary period is explicitly attributed to two external analyses, [59] and [78]; although [78] includes one of the review's authors, [59] is independent, and the review presents both as converging evidence rather than as a self-contained derivation. The Table 2 'predicted values' are orbital parameters taken from those cited studies, and the 2100-day period is an observed input, but the review does not claim the period was independently predicted by the companion model. The skeptical concern that large-scale convection could mimic the orbital radial-velocity signal is a physical correctness risk, not circularity: no equation or fit in the review makes 'companion' true by construction, and no quantity is renamed from an input to an output. The paper is therefore self-contained as a review against external benchmarks, and no circular step is exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The review itself introduces no free parameters and relies on assumptions from the cited literature. The main assumptions are the stability and orbital interpretation of the LSP, the adopted distance, and the fidelity of the hydrodynamic simulations. The proposed companion is not new to this paper but is a central hypothesized entity.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The 2100-day long secondary period is a stable and coherent signal in both photometry and radial velocity.
    Section 4 and Figure 4; the review treats the LSP as a real periodic signal and, with [59,78], attributes it to an orbiting companion.
  • domain assumption The radial velocity variation at the LSP period is caused by orbital motion rather than by convection or pulsation.
    Section 4, Table 2; this is the core assumption of the companion hypothesis.
  • domain assumption The distance to Betelgeuse from [35] (222 pc) is used for the 'This work' radius in Table 1.
    Section 2.2; the distance uncertainty is large and affects all physical parameters.
  • domain assumption The hydrodynamic simulations of [61] accurately capture the coupling of convection and pulsation that leads to the surface mass ejection.
    Section 3, Figure 5; used to interpret the Great Dimming as a surface mass ejection.
invented entities (1)
  • Betelgeuse B (proposed companion) independent evidence
    purpose: Proposed companion to explain the 2100-day long secondary period in photometry and radial velocity.
    Predicted separation ~50 mas, period ~2100-2170 days, mass ~0.6-1.2 M_sun; direct detection attempts with HST, Chandra, and VLT/SPHERE are described (Section 4, Table 2).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Betelgeuse, the Prototypical Red Supergiant." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MEAFIFJ6

@misc{pith2026250715966,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Betelgeuse, the Prototypical Red Supergiant},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MEAFIFJ6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.15966}
}
read the original abstract

The behavior of the bright red supergiant, Betelgeuse, is described with results principally from the past 6 years. The review includes imaging, photometry, and spectroscopy to record the Great Dimming of 2019--2020. This event was followed by a slow ongoing recovery from the massive surface mass ejection after which the stellar characteristics changed. Theoretical simulations address the cause of this episodic mass ejection and the optical Dimming. Recent publications evaluating the perplexing 2100 day periodicity in the star's brightness and radial velocity provide evidence that Betelgeuse may harbor a companion object. Current attempts at direct detection of this companion are discussed. Betelgeuse provides a well-studied and meaningful example for supergiant stars in our Galaxy and others.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.15966 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Various spatially resolved observations of Betelgeuse. On each image North is up and East to the left. The spatial scale is indicated with a ruler at the bottom right corner of each image. Image inspired by presentations from P. Kervella. (First image) VLT/SPHERE adaptive optics image from January 2019 at 644.9 nm [18]. (Second image) VLT/NACO composite image from 1.04 to 2.17 µm obtained in January 2009. [19]. (Thi… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The rotating Betelgeuse. (Left) UV continuum direct image taken with HST/FOC in March 1995 [8] showing the hot spot and the direction of rotation of the star [22]. (Right) Velocity map of Betelgeuse in the 28SiO (v = 2, J = 8 − 7) emission line measured over the equivalent continuum disk of the star in 2015–2016 [28]. Following the first images, spectra were obtained with the Small Science Aperture (220 mas squared)… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Betelgeuse images in the 253 nm continuum taken with the HST/FOC beginning in 1995 March and extending to 1999 March. The star HZ 4 is a single white dwarf which is a point source in diameter as compared to Betelgeuse. (Top panel) Images scaled to the same exposure time (3559 s) illustrating the strong variation in the ultraviolet flux. (Lower panel) Images scaled to the brightest pixel in the image which demonstrat… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: V-band photometry from the AAVSO (upper panel) and radial velocity (lower panel). From STELLA [60]. The red curve marks a smoothed spline fit to the observational data where the short period variation (300–400 days) is obvious prior to the Great Dimming. Maxima and min…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Slices in radial velocity from the hydrodynamic calculations showing evolution of the hot plume of material as it approaches and spreads out over the stellar surface. Figure from [61] [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (Left panel) Mg II h and k fluxes (2803 Å and 2795 Å) as measured from spatially resolved ultraviolet STIS spectra from 2019 to 2020. The solid line connects the h-line of the doublet. Note that the material ejected from the surface in early 2019 did not reach the chro…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: VLT/SPHERE adaptive optics imaging of the photosphere of Betelgeuse during the Great Dimming at 644.9 nm. North is up and East to the left. The epoch of each observations is indicated in the top left corner of the images. The white disk on the lower right corner of the…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Sixteen-band monitoring of Betelgeuse over 4.5 years from 470 nm to 13.28 µm using the weather satellite Himawari-8. Figure from [64]. 4. Long Secondary Period The Long Secondary Period (LSP) of Betelgeuse has been identified for some time with no conclusion as to its …
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Map of the trace on the ground from the occultation of Betelgeuse by the solar system asteroid (319) Leona on 12 December 2023 (https://lesia.obspm.fr/lucky-star/occ.php?p=131608, accessed on 21 April 2025). 6. Implications for Other Supergiant Stars The size and brigh…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [61]

    Left Ringing: Betelgeuse Illuminates the Connection between Convective Outbursts, Mode Switching, and Mass Ejection in Red Supergiants.Astrophys

    MacLeod, M.; Antoni, A.; Huang, C.D.; Dupree, A.; Loeb, A. Left Ringing: Betelgeuse Illuminates the Connection between Convective Outbursts, Mode Switching, and Mass Ejection in Red Supergiants.Astrophys. J.2023,956, 27. https://doi.org/10.3 847/1538-4357/aced4b

  2. [18]

    A dusty veil shading Betelgeuse during its Great Dimming.Nature2021,594, 365–368

    Montargès, M.; Cannon, E.; Lagadec, E.; de Koter, A.; Kervella, P .; Sanchez-Bermudez, J.; Paladini, C.; Cantalloube, F.; Decin, L.; Scicluna, P .; et al. A dusty veil shading Betelgeuse during its Great Dimming.Nature2021,594, 365–368. https://doi.org/10.103 8/s41586-021-03546-8

  3. [41]

    Is Betelgeuse Really Rotating? Synthetic ALMA Observations of Large-scale Convection in 3D Simulations of Red Supergiants.Astrophys

    Ma, J.Z.; Chiavassa, A.; de Mink, S.E.; Valli, R.; Justham, S.; Freytag, B. Is Betelgeuse Really Rotating? Synthetic ALMA Observations of Large-scale Convection in 3D Simulations of Red Supergiants.Astrophys. J. Lett.2024,962, L36. https: //doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ad24fd

  4. [78]

    Radial Velocity and Astrometric Evidence for a Close Companion to Betelgeuse.Astrophys

    MacLeod, M.; Blunt, S.; De Rosa, R.J.; Dupree, A.K.; Granzer, T.; Harper, G.M.; Huang, C.D.; Leiner, E.M.; Loeb, A.; Nielsen, E.L.; et al. Radial Velocity and Astrometric Evidence for a Close Companion to Betelgeuse.Astrophys. J.2025,978, 50. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad93c8

  5. [59]

    A Buddy for Betelgeuse: Binarity as the Origin of the Long Secondary Period in α Orionis

    Goldberg, J.A.; Joyce, M.; Molnár, L. A Buddy for Betelgeuse: Binarity as the Origin of the Long Secondary Period in α Orionis. Astrophys. J.2024,977, 35. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad87f4

  6. [35]

    An Updated 2017 Astrometric Solution for Betelgeuse.Astron

    Harper, G.M.; Brown, A.; Guinan, E.F.; O’Gorman, E.; Richards, A.M.S.; Kervella, P .; Decin, L. An Updated 2017 Astrometric Solution for Betelgeuse.Astron. J.2017,154, 11. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/aa6ff9

  7. [1]

    The anthropoid in the sky: Does a 32,000-year old ivory plate show the constellation Orion combined with a pregnancy calendar?Upps

    Rappenglück, M. The anthropoid in the sky: Does a 32,000-year old ivory plate show the constellation Orion combined with a pregnancy calendar?Upps. Astron. Obs. Rep.2003,59, 51

  8. [2]

    Colour evolution of Betelgeuse and Antares over two millennia, derived from historical records, as a new constraint on mass and age.Mon

    Neuhäuser, R.; Torres, G.; Mugrauer, M.; Neuhäuser, D.L.; Chapman, J.; Luge, D.; Cosci, M. Colour evolution of Betelgeuse and Antares over two millennia, derived from historical records, as a new constraint on mass and age.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.2022, 516, 693–719. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac1969

Show all 90 references
  1. [3]

    Measurement of the diameter of alpha Orionis with the interferometer.Astrophys

    Michelson, A.A.; Pease, F.G. Measurement of the diameter of alpha Orionis with the interferometer.Astrophys. J.1921,53, 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1086/142603

  2. [4]

    30, 1920

    GIANT STAR EQUAL TO 27,000,000 SUNS LIKE OURS.The New Y ork TimesDec. 30, 1920

  3. [5]

    (Eds.)Betelgeuse Workshop 2012; EAS Publications Series; EDP: Les Ulis, France, 2013; Volume 60

    Kervella, P .; Le Bertre, T.; Perrin, G. (Eds.)Betelgeuse Workshop 2012; EAS Publications Series; EDP: Les Ulis, France, 2013; Volume 60

  4. [6]

    The Perkins Catalog of Revised MK Types for the Cooler Stars.Astrophys

    Keenan, P .C.; McNeil, R.C. The Perkins Catalog of Revised MK Types for the Cooler Stars.Astrophys. J. Suppl.1989,71, 245. https://doi.org/10.1086/191373

  5. [7]

    The Bright Star Catalogue, 5th revised edition.Astron

    Hoffleit, D.; Warren, W.H., Jr. The Bright Star Catalogue, 5th revised edition.Astron. Data Cent. Bull.1987,1, 285–294

  6. [8]

    First Image of the Surface of a Star with the Hubble Space Telescope.Astrophys

    Gilliland, R.L.; Dupree, A.K. First Image of the Surface of a Star with the Hubble Space Telescope.Astrophys. J.1996,463, L29. https://doi.org/10.1086/310043

  7. [9]

    Spatially resolving the inhomogeneous structure of the dynamical atmosphere of Betelgeuse with VLTI/AMBER.Astron

    Ohnaka, K.; Hofmann, K.H.; Benisty, M.; Chelli, A.; Driebe, T.; Millour, F.; Petrov, R.; Schertl, D.; Stee, P .; Vakili, F.; et al. Spatially resolving the inhomogeneous structure of the dynamical atmosphere of Betelgeuse with VLTI/AMBER.Astron. Astrophys.2009, 503, 183–195. h...

  8. [10]

    Imaging the spotty surface of <ASTROBJ>Betelgeuse</ASTROBJ> in the H band.Astron

    Haubois, X.; Perrin, G.; Lacour, S.; Verhoelst, T.; Meimon, S.; Mugnier, L.; Thiébaut, E.; Berger, J.P .; Ridgway, S.T.; Monnier, J.D.; et al. Imaging the spotty surface of <ASTROBJ>Betelgeuse</ASTROBJ> in the H band.Astron. Astrophys.2009,508, 923–932. https://doi.org/10.1051...

  9. [11]

    Imaging the dynamical atmosphere of the red supergiant Betelgeuse in the CO first overtone lines with VLTI/AMBER.Astron

    Ohnaka, K.; Weigelt, G.; Millour, F.; Hofmann, K.H.; Driebe, T.; Schertl, D.; Chelli, A.; Massi, F.; Petrov, R.; Stee, P . Imaging the dynamical atmosphere of the red supergiant Betelgeuse in the CO first overtone lines with VLTI/AMBER.Astron. Astrophys. 2011,529, A163. https:...

  10. [12]

    Direct ultraviolet imaging and spectroscopy of betelgeuse

    Dupree, A.K.; Stefanik, R.P . Direct ultraviolet imaging and spectroscopy of betelgeuse. InProceedings of the EAS Publications Series; Kervella, P ., Le Bertre, T., Perrin, G., Eds.; EAS Publications Series; EDP: Les Ulis, France, 2013; Volume 60, pp. 77–84. https://doi.org/10...

  11. [13]

    The close circumstellar environment of Betelgeuse

    Montargès, M.; Kervella, P .; Perrin, G.; Chiavassa, A.; Le Bouquin, J.B.; Aurière, M.; López Ariste, A.; Mathias, P .; Ridgway, S.T.; Lacour, S.; et al. The close circumstellar environment of Betelgeuse. IV . VLTI/PIONIER interferometric monitoring of the photosphere.Astron. ...

  12. [14]

    The inhomogeneous submillimeter atmosphere of Betelgeuse.Astron

    O’Gorman, E.; Kervella, P .; Harper, G.M.; Richards, A.M.S.; Decin, L.; Montargès, M.; McDonald, I. The inhomogeneous submillimeter atmosphere of Betelgeuse.Astron. Astrophys.2017,602, L10. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201731171

  13. [15]

    Three-dimensional imaging of convective cells in the photosphere of Betelgeuse.Astron

    López Ariste, A.; Georgiev, S.; Mathias, P .; Lèbre, A.; Wavasseur, M.; Josselin, E.; Konstantinova-Antova, R.; Roudier, T. Three-dimensional imaging of convective cells in the photosphere of Betelgeuse.Astron. Astrophys.2022,661, A91. https: //doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202142271

  14. [16]

    The variability of Betelgeuse explained by surface convection

    Pilate, Q.; Ariste, A.L.; Lavail, A.; Mathias, P . The variability of Betelgeuse explained by surface convection. A&A2024,691, A297, [arXiv:astro-ph.SR/2410.08819]. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202450987

  15. [17]

    Radiative hydrodynamics simulations of red supergiant stars

    Chiavassa, A.; Haubois, X.; Young, J.S.; Plez, B.; Josselin, E.; Perrin, G.; Freytag, B. Radiative hydrodynamics simulations of red supergiant stars. II. Simulations of convection on Betelgeuse match interferometric observations.Astron. Astrophys.2010, 515, A12. https://doi.or...

  16. [19]

    The close circumstellar environment of Betelgeuse

    Kervella, P .; Verhoelst, T.; Ridgway, S.T.; Perrin, G.; Lacour, S.; Cami, J.; Haubois, X. The close circumstellar environment of Betelgeuse. Adaptive optics spectro-imaging in the near-IR with VLT/NACO.Astron. Astrophys.2009,504, 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200912521

  17. [20]

    The enigmatic nature of the circumstellar envelope and bow shock surrounding Betelgeuse as revealed by Herschel

    Decin, L.; Cox, N.L.J.; Royer, P .; Van Marle, A.J.; Vandenbussche, B.; Ladjal, D.; Kerschbaum, F.; Ottensamer, R.; Barlow, M.J.; Blommaert, J.A.D.L.; et al. The enigmatic nature of the circumstellar envelope and bow shock surrounding Betelgeuse as revealed by Herschel. I. Evi...

  18. [21]

    Betelgeuse: A review.Astron

    Wheeler, J.C.; Chatzopoulos, E. Betelgeuse: A review.Astron. Geophys.2023,64, 3.11–3.27. https://doi.org/10.1093/astrogeo/ atad020

  19. [22]

    Spatially Resolved Hubble Space Telescope Spectra of the Chromosphere of alpha Orionis.Astron

    Uitenbroek, H.; Dupree, A.K.; Gilliland, R.L. Spatially Resolved Hubble Space Telescope Spectra of the Chromosphere of alpha Orionis.Astron. J.1998,116, 2501–2512. https://doi.org/10.1086/300596

  20. [23]

    Spatially Resolved Ultraviolet Spectroscopy of the Great Dimming of Betelgeuse.Astrophys

    Dupree, A.K.; Strassmeier, K.G.; Matthews, L.D.; Uitenbroek, H.; Calderwood, T.; Granzer, T.; Guinan, E.F.; Leike, R.; Montargès, M.; Richards, A.M.S.; et al. Spatially Resolved Ultraviolet Spectroscopy of the Great Dimming of Betelgeuse.Astrophys. J.2020, 899, 68. https://doi...

  21. [24]

    The changing face of Betelgeuse.Mon

    Wilson, R.W.; Dhillon, V .S.; Haniff, C.A. The changing face of Betelgeuse.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.1997,291, 819–826. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/291.4.819

  22. [25]

    On the scale of photospheric convection in red giants and supergiants.Astrophys

    Schwarzschild, M. On the scale of photospheric convection in red giants and supergiants.Astrophys. J.1975,195, 137–144. https://doi.org/10.1086/153313

  23. [26]

    Atmosphere of Betelgeuse before and during the Great Dimming event revealed by tomography.Astron

    Kravchenko, K.; Jorissen, A.; Van Eck, S.; Merle, T.; Chiavassa, A.; Paladini, C.; Freytag, B.; Plez, B.; Montargès, M.; Van Winckel, H. Atmosphere of Betelgeuse before and during the Great Dimming event revealed by tomography.Astron. Astrophys.2021, 650, L17. https://doi.org/...

  24. [27]

    The Great Dimming of Betelgeuse: The photosphere as revealed by tomography over the past 15 yr.Astron

    Jadlovský, D.; Granzer, T.; Weber, M.; Kravchenko, K.; Krtiˇ cka, J.; Dupree, A.K.; Chiavassa, A.; Strassmeier, K.G.; Poppenhäger, K. The Great Dimming of Betelgeuse: The photosphere as revealed by tomography over the past 15 yr.Astron. Astrophys.2024, 685, A124. https://doi.o...

  25. [28]

    The close circumstellar environment of Betelgeuse

    Kervella, P .; Decin, L.; Richards, A.M.S.; Harper, G.M.; McDonald, I.; O’Gorman, E.; Montargès, M.; Homan, W.; Ohnaka, K. The close circumstellar environment of Betelgeuse. V . Rotation velocity and molecular envelope properties from ALMA.Astron. Astrophys.2018,609, A67. http...

  26. [29]

    Spatially Resolved STIS Spectroscopy of α Orionis: Evidence for Nonradial Chromospheric Oscillation from Detailed Modeling.Astrophys

    Lobel, A.; Dupree, A.K. Spatially Resolved STIS Spectroscopy of α Orionis: Evidence for Nonradial Chromospheric Oscillation from Detailed Modeling.Astrophys. J.2001,558, 815–829. https://doi.org/10.1086/322284

  27. [30]

    Radiative hydrodynamic simulations of red supergiant stars

    Chiavassa, A.; Pasquato, E.; Jorissen, A.; Sacuto, S.; Babusiaux, C.; Freytag, B.; Ludwig, H.G.; Cruzalèbes, P .; Rabbia, Y.; Spang, A.; et al. Radiative hydrodynamic simulations of red supergiant stars. III. Spectro-photocentric variability, photometric variability, and conse...

  28. [31]

    Probing red supergiant dynamics through photo-center displacements measured by Gaia.Astron

    Chiavassa, A.; Kudritzki, R.; Davies, B.; Freytag, B.; de Mink, S.E. Probing red supergiant dynamics through photo-center displacements measured by Gaia.Astron. Astrophys.2022,661, L1. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202243568

  29. [32]

    (Ed.)The HIPP ARCOS and TYCHO Catalogues

    ESA. (Ed.)The HIPP ARCOS and TYCHO Catalogues. Astrometric and Photometric Star Catalogues Derived from the ESA HIPP ARCOS Space Astrometry Mission; ESA Special Publication; ESA: Paris, France, 1997; Volume 1200. Galaxies2025,1, 0 15 of 17

  30. [33]

    The HIPPARCOS Catalogue.Astron

    Perryman, M.A.C.; Lindegren, L.; Kovalevsky, J.; Hoeg, E.; Bastian, U.; Bernacca, P .L.; Crézé, M.; Donati, F.; Grenon, M.; Grewing, M.; et al. The HIPPARCOS Catalogue.Astron. Astrophys.1997,323, L49–L52

  31. [34]

    Validation of the new Hipparcos reduction.Astron

    van Leeuwen, F. Validation of the new Hipparcos reduction.Astron. Astrophys.2007,474, 653–664. https://doi.org/10.1051/00 04-6361:20078357

  32. [36]

    A New VLA-Hipparcos Distance to Betelgeuse and its Implications.Astron

    Harper, G.M.; Brown, A.; Guinan, E.F. A New VLA-Hipparcos Distance to Betelgeuse and its Implications.Astron. J.2008, 135, 1430–1440. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-6256/135/4/1430

  33. [37]

    Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: New Mass and Distance Estimates for Betelgeuse through Combined Evolutionary, Asteroseismic, and Hydrodynamic Simulations with MESA

    Joyce, M.; Leung, S.C.; Molnár, L.; Ireland, M.; Kobayashi, C.; Nomoto, K. Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: New Mass and Distance Estimates for Betelgeuse through Combined Evolutionary, Asteroseismic, and Hydrodynamic Simulations with MESA. Astrophys. J.2020,902, 63. https...

  34. [38]

    The Great Dimming of Betelgeuse: A Surface Mass Ejection and Its Consequences.Astrophys

    Dupree, A.K.; Strassmeier, K.G.; Calderwood, T.; Granzer, T.; Weber, M.; Kravchenko, K.; Matthews, L.D.; Montargès, M.; Tappin, J.; Thompson, W.T. The Great Dimming of Betelgeuse: A Surface Mass Ejection and Its Consequences.Astrophys. J.2022,936, 18. https://doi.org/10.3847/1...

  35. [39]

    The Effective Temperature Scale of Galactic Red Supergiants: Cool, but Not As Cool As We Thought.Astrophys

    Levesque, E.M.; Massey, P .; Olsen, K.A.G.; Plez, B.; Josselin, E.; Maeder, A.; Meynet, G. The Effective Temperature Scale of Galactic Red Supergiants: Cool, but Not As Cool As We Thought.Astrophys. J.2005,628, 973–985. https://doi.org/10.1086/430901

  36. [40]

    Local kinematics of K and M giants from CORAVEL-Hipparco-Tycho-2 data

    Famaey, B.; Jorissen, A.; Luri, X.; Mayor, M.; Udry, S.; Dejonghe, H.; Turon, C. Local kinematics of K and M giants from CORAVEL-Hipparco-Tycho-2 data. Revisiting the concept of superclusters.Astron. Astrophys.2005,430, 165–186. https: //doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20041272

  37. [42]

    Probing the mass-loss history of AGB and red supergiant stars from CO rotational line profiles

    De Beck, E.; Decin, L.; de Koter, A.; Justtanont, K.; Verhoelst, T.; Kemper, F.; Menten, K.M. Probing the mass-loss history of AGB and red supergiant stars from CO rotational line profiles. II. CO line survey of evolved stars: Derivation of mass-loss rate formulae.Astron. Astr...

  38. [43]

    Evolutionary Tracks for Betelgeuse

    Dolan, M.M.; Mathews, G.J.; Lam, D.D.; Quynh Lan, N.; Herczeg, G.J.; Dearborn, D.S.P . Evolutionary Tracks for Betelgeuse. Astrophys. J.2016,819, 7. https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/819/1/7

  39. [44]

    The evolutionary stage of Betelgeuse inferred from its pulsation periods.Mon

    Saio, H.; Nandal, D.; Meynet, G.; Ekström, S. The evolutionary stage of Betelgeuse inferred from its pulsation periods.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.2023,526, 2765–2775. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad2949

  40. [45]

    The Betelgeuse Project: Constraints from rotation.Mon

    Wheeler, J.C.; Nance, S.; Diaz, M.; Smith, S.G.; Hickey, J.; Zhou, L.; Koutoulaki, M.; Sullivan, J.M.; Fowler, J.M. The Betelgeuse Project: Constraints from rotation.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.2017,465, 2654–2661. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2893

  41. [46]

    Is Betelgeuse the Outcome of a Past Merger?Astrophys

    Chatzopoulos, E.; Frank, J.; Marcello, D.C.; Clayton, G.C. Is Betelgeuse the Outcome of a Past Merger?Astrophys. J.2020,896, 50. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab91bb

  42. [47]

    The Betelgeuse Project

    Sullivan, J.M.; Nance, S.; Wheeler, J.C. The Betelgeuse Project. III. Merger Characteristics.Astrophys. J.2020,905, 128. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abc3c9

  43. [48]

    Binary Interaction Dominates the Evolution of Massive Stars.Science2012,337, 444

    Sana, H.; de Mink, S.E.; de Koter, A.; Langer, N.; Evans, C.J.; Gieles, M.; Gosset, E.; Izzard, R.G.; Le Bouquin, J.B.; Schneider, F.R.N. Binary Interaction Dominates the Evolution of Massive Stars.Science2012,337, 444. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1223344

  44. [49]

    The origin of close massive binaries in the M17 star-forming region.Astron

    Bordier, E.; Frost, A.J.; Sana, H.; Reggiani, M.; Mérand, A.; Rainot, A.; Ramírez-Tannus, M.C.; de Wit, W.J. The origin of close massive binaries in the M17 star-forming region.Astron. Astrophys.2022,663, A26. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202141 849

  45. [50]

    Apparent Magnitude of Betelgeuse as a Type IIP Supernova.Res

    Goldberg, J.A.; Bauer, E.B.; Howell, D.A. Apparent Magnitude of Betelgeuse as a Type IIP Supernova.Res. Notes Am. Astron. Soc. 2020,4, 35. https://doi.org/10.3847/2515-5172/ab7c68

  46. [51]

    Comment on the Feasibility of Carbon Burning in Betelgeuse.Res

    Molnár, L.; Joyce, M.; Leung, S.C. Comment on the Feasibility of Carbon Burning in Betelgeuse.Res. Notes Am. Astron. Soc.2023, 7, 119. https://doi.org/10.3847/2515-5172/acdb7a

  47. [52]

    Properties of the CO and H2O MOLsphere of the red supergiant Betelgeuse from VLTI/AMBER observations.Astron

    Montargès, M.; Kervella, P .; Perrin, G.; Ohnaka, K.; Chiavassa, A.; Ridgway, S.T.; Lacour, S.M. Properties of the CO and H2O MOLsphere of the red supergiant Betelgeuse from VLTI/AMBER observations.Astron. Astrophys.2014,572, A17. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201423538

  48. [53]

    Grids of stellar models with rotation

    Ekström, S.; Georgy, C.; Eggenberger, P .; Meynet, G.; Mowlavi, N.; Wyttenbach, A.; Granada, A.; Decressin, T.; Hirschi, R.; Frischknecht, U.; et al. Grids of stellar models with rotation. I. Models from 0.8 to 120 M &sun; at solar metallicity (Z = 0.014). Astron. Astrophys.20...

  49. [54]

    The Mass-loss History of the Red Hypergiant VY CMa.Astron

    Humphreys, R.M.; Davidson, K.; Richards, A.M.S.; Ziurys, L.M.; Jones, T.J.; Ishibashi, K. The Mass-loss History of the Red Hypergiant VY CMa.Astron. J.2021,161, 98. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/abd316

  50. [55]

    Circumstellar Shells Resolved in the IRAS Survey Data

    Young, K.; Phillips, T.G.; Knapp, G.R. Circumstellar Shells Resolved in the IRAS Survey Data. I. Data Processing Procedure, Results, and Confidence Tests.Astrophys. J. Suppl.1993,86, 517. https://doi.org/10.1086/191789

  51. [56]

    A Parsec-Size Bow Shock around Betelgeuse.Astron

    Noriega-Crespo, A.; van Buren, D.; Cao, Y.; Dgani, R. A Parsec-Size Bow Shock around Betelgeuse.Astron. J.1997,114, 837–840. https://doi.org/10.1086/118517

  52. [57]

    Discovery of a detached H I gas shell surroundingα Orionis.Mon

    Le Bertre, T.; Matthews, L.D.; Gérard, E.; Libert, Y. Discovery of a detached H I gas shell surroundingα Orionis.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.2012,422, 3433–3443. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20853.x. Galaxies2025,1, 0 16 of 17

  53. [58]

    The long secondary periods in semi-regular variables

    Wood, P .R.; Olivier, A.E.; Kawaler, S.D. The long secondary periods in semi-regular variables. InProceedings of the IAU Colloq. 193: Variable Stars in the Local Group; Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series; Kurtz, D.W., Pollard, K.R., Eds.; Cambridge Universit...

  54. [60]

    Betelgeuse: Long Secondary Period, a Fundamental Mode and Overtones

    Granzer, T.; Weber, M.; Strassmeier, K.G.; Dupree, A. Betelgeuse: Long Secondary Period, a Fundamental Mode and Overtones. In Proceedings of The 21st Cambridge Workshop on Cool Stars, Stellar Systems, and the Sun, Toulouse, France, 4–9 July 2022; p. 185. https://doi.org/10.528...

  55. [62]

    The Curious Case of Betelgeuse

    Granzer, T.; Weber, M.; Strassmeier, K.G.; Dupree, A. The Curious Case of Betelgeuse. In Proceedings of the 20.5th Cambridge Workshop on Cool Stars, Stellar Systems, and the Sun (CS20.5), Virtually, 2–4 March 2021; p. 41. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo. 4561732

  56. [63]

    Effective temperatures of red supergiants estimated from line-depth ratios of iron lines in the YJ bands, 0.97–1.32 µm.Mon

    Taniguchi, D.; Matsunaga, N.; Jian, M.; Kobayashi, N.; Fukue, K.; Hamano, S.; Ikeda, Y.; Kawakita, H.; Kondo, S.; Otsubo, S.; et al. Effective temperatures of red supergiants estimated from line-depth ratios of iron lines in the YJ bands, 0.97–1.32 µm.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc....

  57. [64]

    The Great Dimming of Betelgeuse seen by the Himawari-8 meteorological satellite.Nat

    Taniguchi, D.; Yamazaki, K.; Uno, S. The Great Dimming of Betelgeuse seen by the Himawari-8 meteorological satellite.Nat. Astron.2022,6, 930–935. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-022-01680-5

  58. [65]

    Spatially Resolved Observations of Betelgeuse at λ7 mm and λ1.3 cm Just prior to the Great Dimming.Astrophys

    Matthews, L.D.; Dupree, A.K. Spatially Resolved Observations of Betelgeuse at λ7 mm and λ1.3 cm Just prior to the Great Dimming.Astrophys. J.2022,934, 131. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac7726

  59. [66]

    Spectroscopic evidence for a large spot on the dimming Betelgeuse

    Alexeeva, S.; Zhao, G.; Gao, D.Y.; Du, J.; Li, A.; Li, K.; Hu, S. Spectroscopic evidence for a large spot on the dimming Betelgeuse. Nat. Commun.2021,12, 4719. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25018-3

  60. [67]

    The Fainting of the Nearby Red Supergiant Betelgeuse.Astron

    Guinan, E.F.; Wasatonic, R.J.; Calderwood, T.J. The Fainting of the Nearby Red Supergiant Betelgeuse.Astron. T elegr.2019, 13341, 1

  61. [68]

    Betelgeuse Just Is Not That Cool: Effective Temperature Alone Cannot Explain the Recent Dimming of Betelgeuse.Astrophys

    Levesque, E.M.; Massey, P . Betelgeuse Just Is Not That Cool: Effective Temperature Alone Cannot Explain the Recent Dimming of Betelgeuse.Astrophys. J. Lett.2020,891, L37. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab7935

  62. [69]

    Multi-band Aperture Polarimetry of Betelgeuse during the 2019-20 Dimming.Res

    Cotton, D.V .; Bailey, J.; De Horta, A.Y.; Norris, B.R.M.; Lomax, J.R. Multi-band Aperture Polarimetry of Betelgeuse during the 2019-20 Dimming.Res. Notes Am. Astron. Soc.2020,4, 39. https://doi.org/10.3847/2515-5172/ab7f2f

  63. [70]

    Differential Speckle Polarimetry of Betelgeuse in 2019–2020: The rise is different from the fall.arXiv2020, arXiv:2005.05215

    Safonov, B.; Dodin, A.; Burlak, M.; Goliguzova, M.; Fedoteva, A.; Zheltoukhov, S.; Lamzin, S.; Strakhov, I.; Voziakova, O. Differential Speckle Polarimetry of Betelgeuse in 2019–2020: The rise is different from the fall.arXiv2020, arXiv:2005.05215. https://doi.org/10.48550/arX...

  64. [71]

    Near-IR spectra of red supergiants and giants

    Lançon, A.; Hauschildt, P .H.; Ladjal, D.; Mouhcine, M. Near-IR spectra of red supergiants and giants. I. Models with solar and with mixing-induced surface abundance ratios.Astron. Astrophys.2007,468, 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20065824

  65. [72]

    RADMC-3D: A multi-purpose radiative transfer tool

    Dullemond, C.P .; Juhasz, A.; Pohl, A.; Sereshti, F.; Shetty, R.; Peters, T.; Commercon, B.; Flock, M. RADMC-3D: A multi-purpose radiative transfer tool. Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1202.015, 2012

  66. [73]

    Non-detection of Betelgeuse in X-rays.Astron

    Kashyap, V .L.; Drake, J.J.; Patnaude, D. Non-detection of Betelgeuse in X-rays.Astron. T elegr.2020,13501, 1

  67. [74]

    Dimming events of evolved stars due to clouds of molecular gas: Scenarios based on 3D radiation-hydrodynamics simulations with CO5BOLD.Astron

    Freytag, B.; Höfner, S.; Aringer, B.; Chiavassa, A. Dimming events of evolved stars due to clouds of molecular gas: Scenarios based on 3D radiation-hydrodynamics simulations with CO5BOLD.Astron. Astrophys.2024,692, A223. https://doi.org/10.105 1/0004-6361/202450829

  68. [75]

    Determination of the Photometric Calibration and Large-Scale Flatfield of the STEREO Heliospheric Imagers: II

    Tappin, S.J.; Eyles, C.J.; Davies, J.A. Determination of the Photometric Calibration and Large-Scale Flatfield of the STEREO Heliospheric Imagers: II. HI-2.Sol. Phys.2015,290, 2143–2170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-015-0737-5

  69. [76]

    Photometry of Betelgeuse with the STEREO Mission While in the Glare of the Sun from Earth.Astron

    Dupree, A.; Guinan, E.; Thompson, W.T.; STEREO/SECCHI/HI Consortium. Photometry of Betelgeuse with the STEREO Mission While in the Glare of the Sun from Earth.Astron. T elegr.2020,13901, 1

  70. [77]

    Binarity as the Origin of Long Secondary Periods in Red Giant Stars.Astrophys

    Soszy ´ nski, I.; Olechowska, A.; Ratajczak, M.; Iwanek, P .; Skowron, D.M.; Mróz, P .; Pietrukowicz, P .; Udalski, A.; Szyma ´ nski, M.K.; Skowron, J.; et al. Binarity as the Origin of Long Secondary Periods in Red Giant Stars.Astrophys. J. Lett.2021,911, L22. https://doi.org...

  71. [79]

    An Atlas of Alpha Orionis Obtained with the Goddard High Resolution Spectrograph on the Hubble Space Telescope

    Brandt, J.C.; Heap, S.R.; Beaver, E.A.; Boggess, A.; Carpenter, K.G.; Ebbets, D.C.; Hutchings, J.B.; Jura, M.; Leckrone, D.S.; Linsky, J.L.; et al. An Atlas of Alpha Orionis Obtained with the Goddard High Resolution Spectrograph on the Hubble Space Telescope. Astron. J.1995,10...

  72. [80]

    A Far-Ultraviolet Spectroscopic Survey of Luminous Cool Stars.Astrophys

    Dupree, A.K.; Lobel, A.; Young, P .R.; Ake, T.B.; Linsky, J.L.; Redfield, S. A Far-Ultraviolet Spectroscopic Survey of Luminous Cool Stars.Astrophys. J.2005,622, 629–652. https://doi.org/10.1086/428111

  73. [81]

    The large trans-Neptunian object 2002 TC302 from combined stellar occultation, photometry, and astrometry data.Astron

    Ortiz, J.L.; Santos-Sanz, P .; Sicardy, B.; Benedetti-Rossi, G.; Duffard, R.; Morales, N.; Braga-Ribas, F.; Fernández-Valenzuela, E.; Nascimbeni, V .; Nardiello, D.; et al. The large trans-Neptunian object 2002 TC302 from combined stellar occultation, photometry, and astrometr...

  74. [82]

    The multichord stellar occultation on 2019 October 22 by the trans-Neptunian object (84922) 2003 VS 2

    Vara-Lubiano, M.; Benedetti-Rossi, G.; Santos-Sanz, P .; Ortiz, J.L.; Sicardy, B.; Popescu, M.; Morales, N.; Rommel, F.L.; Morgado, B.; Pereira, C.L.; et al. The multichord stellar occultation on 2019 October 22 by the trans-Neptunian object (84922) 2003 VS 2. Astron. Astrophy...

  75. [83]

    A stellar occultation by the transneptunian object (50000) Quaoar observed by CHEOPS.Astron

    Morgado, B.E.; Bruno, G.; Gomes-Júnior, A.R.; Pagano, I.; Sicardy, B.; Fortier, A.; Desmars, J.; Maxted, P .F.L.; Braga-Ribas, F.; Queloz, D.; et al. A stellar occultation by the transneptunian object (50000) Quaoar observed by CHEOPS.Astron. Astrophys. 2022,664, L15. https://...

  76. [84]

    Single-photon gig in Betelgeuse’s occultation.arXiv2024, arXiv:2406.14704

    Prada, F.; Gomez-Merchan, R.; Pérez, E.; Betancort-Rijo, J.E.; Leñero-Bardallo, J.A.; Rodríguez-Vázquez, Á.; Glez-de-Rivera, G.; Díaz-López, S.; de Elias Cantalapiedra, J. Single-photon gig in Betelgeuse’s occultation.arXiv2024, arXiv:2406.14704. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv...

  77. [85]

    The Unexpected Spectrum of the Innermost Ejecta of the Red Hypergiant VY CMa.Astrophys

    Humphreys, R.M.; Ziurys, L.M.; Bernal, J.J.; Gordon, M.S.; Helton, L.A.; Ishibashi, K.; Jones, T.J.; Richards, A.M.S.; Vlemmings, W. The Unexpected Spectrum of the Innermost Ejecta of the Red Hypergiant VY CMa.Astrophys. J. Lett.2019,874, L26. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab11e5

  78. [86]

    Episodic Gaseous Outflows and Mass Loss from Red Supergiants.Astron

    Humphreys, R.M.; Jones, T.J. Episodic Gaseous Outflows and Mass Loss from Red Supergiants.Astron. J.2022,163, 103. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ac46ff

  79. [87]

    An Exceptional Dimming Event for a Massive, Cool Supergiant in M51.Astrophys

    Jencson, J.E.; Sand, D.J.; Andrews, J.E.; Smith, N.; Pearson, J.; Strader, J.; Valenti, S.; Beasor, E.R.; Rothberg, B. An Exceptional Dimming Event for a Massive, Cool Supergiant in M51.Astrophys. J.2022,930, 81. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac626c

  80. [88]

    The Great Dimming of the Hypergiant Star RW Cephei: CHARA Array Images and Spectral Analysis.Astron

    Anugu, N.; Baron, F.; Gies, D.R.; Lanthermann, C.; Schaefer, G.H.; Shepard, K.A.; Brummelaar, T.t.; Monnier, J.D.; Kraus, S.; Le Bouquin, J.B.; et al. The Great Dimming of the Hypergiant Star RW Cephei: CHARA Array Images and Spectral Analysis.Astron. J.2023,166, 78. https://d...

  81. [89]

    Time Evolution Images of the Hypergiant RW Cephei during the Rebrightening Phase Following the Great Dimming.Astrophys

    Anugu, N.; Gies, D.R.; Roettenbacher, R.M.; Monnier, J.D.; Montargés, M.; Mérand, A.; Baron, F.; Schaefer, G.H.; Shepard, K.A.; Kraus, S.; et al. Time Evolution Images of the Hypergiant RW Cephei during the Rebrightening Phase Following the Great Dimming.Astrophys. J. Lett.202...

  82. [90]

    Episodic mass loss in the very luminous red supergiant [W60] B90 in the Large Magellanic Cloud.Astron

    Munoz-Sanchez, G.; de Wit, S.; Bonanos, A.Z.; Antoniadis, K.; Boutsia, K.; Boumis, P .; Christodoulou, E.; Kalitsounaki, M.; Udalski, A. Episodic mass loss in the very luminous red supergiant [W60] B90 in the Large Magellanic Cloud.Astron. Astrophys. 2024,690, A99. https://doi...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.