Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Red Supergiant Mass Loss and Mass-Loss Rates

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Red supergiants born above about 20 solar masses shed their mantles and become hotter stars before exploding, while lighter ones die as hydrogen-rich supernovae.

desk verdict A knowledgeable, opinionated review whose central Z^0 and bimodality claims rest partly on the author's own calibrations; the abstract overstates the evidence. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.15971 v1 pith:7LS6PE63 submitted 2025-07-21 astro-ph.SR

Jacco Th. van Loon (Keele University , UK) This is my paper
classification astro-ph.SR
keywords redsupergiantsmasslosssupernovaprogenitorsstellarwindscircumstellardustmetallicitydependencegas-to-dustratioyellowhypergiants
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that red supergiant mass loss is a basic response of a star to gravity, a way of approaching equilibrium, rather than a process whose rate is set by the chemical abundance of the gas. Surveying decades of empirical mass-loss prescriptions and observations, the paper finds no evidence that the total mass-loss rate depends on metallicity; the only composition effect is the gas-to-dust ratio, which scales inversely with metallicity and governs whether dusty winds can form. It also contends that tracer-based methods commonly misjudge rates because they fail to correct varying scaling factors, which biases low measured rates downward and makes empirical relations look steeper than the physical ones. The central outcome is a bimodality of fates: red supergiants born below about 20 solar masses lose mass too slowly to strip their mantles and die as hydrogen-rich supernovae, whereas the most massive ones experience intense dusty superwinds and become hotter yellow hypergiants (an intermediate, hotter stage) or stripped stars before exploding. If this picture holds, it explains why every well-identified hydrogen-rich supernova progenitor is a low- or intermediate-mass red supergiant.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is a set of empirically calibrated scaling relations connecting the mass-loss rate $\dot M$ to luminosity, effective temperature, pulsation period, and surface gravity, together with the prescription that dusty winds scale as $\dot M \propto Z^0$ while the gas-to-dust ratio obeys $\psi \propto 1/Z$. These relations are tested against multi-wavelength tracers (mid-infrared dust, hydroxyl and water masers, carbon-monoxide lines, chromospheric emission) and against the demographic record of supernova progenitors. The review also isolates a systematic bias in tracer methods: when the gas-to-dust ratio or luminosity is assumed rather than measured, derived rates are offset, and because the lowest rates are most often underestimated, empirical $\dot M(L)$ relations appear steeper than the underlying physical relation. The interpretive key that connects rates to fate is the two-tier regime seen in the Magellanic Clouds and the galaxy M 33—most red supergiants lose mass below the core-helium-burning nuclear consumption rate of $\sim 10^{-5}\,M_\odot\,$yr$^{-1}$, while a few lose far more—which the paper maps onto a bimodal evolutionary outcome separated near $\sim 20\,M_\odot$ birth mass.

What would settle it

A direct measurement of the gas-to-dust ratio in winds of red supergiants in a low-metallicity galaxy, combined with mass-loss rates from a tracer independent of dust such as carbon monoxide or hydrogen, would settle the metallicity question: if the total $\dot M$ is systematically lower than in metal-rich stars of the same luminosity and temperature, the $Z^0$ claim fails. The bimodal-fate claim would be falsified by the discovery of a hydrogen-rich supernova progenitor with a well-determined birth mass above about $20\,M_\odot$, or by finding that massive red supergiants explode without first becoming hotter.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that red supergiant mass loss is gravity working at the stellar boundary layer: a star radiates and sheds matter because it is not in equilibrium with the rest of the Universe, and the rate of loss is set by the local gravitational potential and luminosity, not by the metallicity of the envelope. After revisiting the main empirical recipes—based on dust emission, maser lines, carbon-monoxide lines, and the extended outer atmosphere (chromosphere)—the author concludes that the total mass-loss rate has no explicit dependence on metallicity ($\dot M \propto Z^0$), while the gas-to-dust ratio varies as $\psi \propto 1/Z$ and the wind speed changes accordingly. A recurring methodological point is that tracer-based estimates often omit corrections for the gas-to-dust ratio and luminosity, so the lowest rates are underestimated and the apparent luminosity dependence is steepened. The review then connects the mass-loss regimes to stellar fate: sub-nuclear rates for the majority, and superwind episodes (far above the nuclear consumption rate) for the most massive stars, producing the observed split between hydrogen-rich explosions from roughly 8–20 $M_\odot$ progenitors and hydrogen-depleted explosions from roughly 20–40 $M_\odot$ stars that first become yellow hypergiants (hotter, yellow supergiants) or stripped stars.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that metallicity changes only the gas-to-dust ratio of a dusty wind ($\psi \propto 1/Z$) and leaves the total mass-loss rate unchanged; if that scaling is wrong, the apparent independence of mass loss from metallicity would be an artifact of how the dust-based rates were calibrated.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Stellar evolution models that scale red supergiant mass-loss rates with metallicity should be revised, since the paper's case is that only dust content and wind speed change with $Z$, not the total rate.
  • Because tracer-based methods systematically underestimate low mass-loss rates, the true gap between typical and superwind rates is narrower than often quoted, though the paper argues it does not close entirely.
  • The majority of core-collapse supernovae should be hydrogen-rich, with progenitors in the 8–20 $M_\odot$ range, while the most massive red supergiants should appear as yellow hypergiants or hydrogen-poor supernovae.
  • Radio and light-curve inferences of dense circumstellar material around supernovae should be read cautiously, since an extended atmosphere can masquerade as a very high wind.
  • Pulsation-period-based recipes that use current mass and radius are better suited than luminosity-based fits for estimating how much mass a red supergiant has actually lost.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not propose a direct test of the $\psi \propto 1/Z$ scaling, but a reader could measure gas-to-dust ratios from carbon-monoxide or hydrogen-line observations of low-metallicity red supergiants and compare dust-based and gas-based mass-loss rates; if they diverge, the $Z^0$ conclusion would need revision.
  • The gravity/equilibrium framing suggests a unified mass-loss law for red giants, red supergiants, and asymptotic-giant-branch stars expressed through a single gravity-like parameter; the review gathers convergent evidence but does not write down such a unified formula.
  • If the $\sim$20 $M_\odot$ boundary is strict, then the relative numbers of yellow hypergiants and hydrogen-poor supernovae should trace the high-mass end of the initial mass function, which existing surveys could test statistically.
  • The warning against reading dense atmospheres as winds implies that some pre-supernova 'eruptions' reported in the literature may be misclassified chromospheric material, which would change inferred mass-loss histories of nearby events such as SN 2023ixf.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This review argues that red supergiant (RSG) mass loss is ultimately governed by gravity and is independent of metallicity in total rate (Mdot ∝ Z^0), that dusty, radiation-driven winds occur only in the coolest and most luminous extreme, and that tracer-based mass-loss measurements systematically underestimate rates at the low end, artificially steepening the empirical Mdot(L) relation. The paper then synthesizes these claims into a bimodal fate for RSGs: initial masses near 8–20 M⊙ lose mass too slowly to shed their mantles and explode as hydrogen-rich supernovae, while more massive RSGs (~20–40 M⊙) undergo intense dusty mass loss, become hotter hypergiants, and explode hydrogen-depleted. The supporting evidence is assembled through historical reanalysis of mass-loss prescriptions, theoretical models (Reimers, Schröder & Cuntz, Kee et al., Fuller & Tsuna), supernova progenitor demographics, and individual case studies (VY CMa, IRC+10420, WOH G64, Betelgeuse).

Significance. If the metallicity-independence and bimodality claims are correct, the review would resolve the long-standing red supergiant problem and directly connect RSG mass loss to core-collapse supernova progenitor demographics, with testable predictions for ejecta masses, circumstellar densities, and radio light curves. The manuscript has clear strengths: it provides an unusually complete historical account of empirical mass-loss prescriptions, identifies systematic biases in dust-based methods, draws together a wide range of recent observational and theoretical literature, and makes explicit, falsifiable predictions in Section 5. The caveat is that the central empirical claims — especially Z^0 metallicity independence and the low-end underestimation bias — are not independently established within the review; they rely on calibration conventions from the author's own prior work and on qualitative rather than quantitative arguments. The review's internal epistemic rule ('in the absence of strong evidence... assume none') is in tension with the 'overwhelming evidence' statement in the abstract.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4, paragraph beginning 'And yet, astronomers have stubbornly expected...'] The claim that Mdot ∝ Z^0 is not independent of the dust-based calibration. The text states that the only explicit metallicity dependence of dusty winds is the gas-to-dust ratio ψ ∝ 1/Z and that Mdot ∝ ψ^{1/2} L^{3/4} (citing Elitzur & Ivezić 2001). If ψ is set to 1/Z in the derivation of the dust-based rates in the cited recipes (van Loon et al. 2005; Goldman et al. 2017), then the Z^0 scaling of Mdot follows by construction rather than by empirical test. The manuscript does not demonstrate that ψ is measured independently (e.g., from wind speeds, masers, or gas tracers) across metallicities, nor does it discuss the circularity explicitly. This is a load-bearing point because the bimodality argument in Section 5 depends on comparing RSG samples in the Galaxy, LMC, and SMC under the Z^0 assumption.
  2. [Abstract and Section 5, final synthesis paragraph] The abstract claims that 'evidence is overwhelming' for the bimodal mass-loss behavior, but the body of the review adopts the epistemic rule that 'in the absence of strong evidence for metallicity dependence of red supergiant mass loss, it must be assumed there is none' (Section 4). Absence of evidence for a metallicity dependence is not positive evidence for Z^0, and the review does not provide a quantitative test that would upgrade the null hypothesis to a measured result. The 'overwhelming' language in the abstract is therefore not supported by the body's own evidentiary standard. The authors should either soften the abstract to 'no evidence for a dependence' or add a concrete quantitative demonstration (e.g., a comparison of independent gas-based and dust-based rates across Z) to justify the stronger claim.
  3. [Section 5, 'If stars are amenable to multiple methods...' (page 17)] The assertion that 'the highest measured mass-loss rates are more likely to be overestimated, and the lowest are more likely to be underestimated... leading to steeper empirical relations than the true, physical ones' is load-bearing for the claim that the empirical Mdot(L) relation is flatter than observed and that the low-luminosity 'kink' (Humphreys et al.; Antoniadis et al.) is at least partly an artifact. The manuscript gives a plausible physical reason (varying gas-to-dust ratio ψ) but does not provide a quantitative demonstration of the size or even the direction of the bias for the relevant samples. A concrete calculation or a comparison between dust-based and CO-based rates for overlapping objects would be needed to establish that the low-end underestimation is real and not simply a restatement of the ψ assumption.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Figure 1] The axes are labeled log(g) and log(Teff) and the spectral subclasses are marked, but no numeric tick marks or values are given; adding a few representative numbers would make the diagram quantitatively useful.
  2. [Section 4, VY CMa/IRC+10420 discussion] In the description of IRC+10420, the mass-loss rate appears as 'Mdot ∼10−3 M⊙' without the per-year unit; it should read 'Mdot ∼10−3 M⊙ yr−1'.
  3. [Section 4, 'vis-á-vis'] The phrase 'vis-á-vis' should be 'vis-à-vis'.
  4. [References] Reference 70 (Javadi et al. 2013) is listed as 'Unpublished'; this should be updated to the published version or marked as in preparation with a year.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The Z^0 metallicity-independence claim is carried by the author's own dust-based recipes that assume psi ∝ 1/Z and omit Z from the Mdot fits, making a central conclusion partly a calibration convention rather than independent evidence; the bimodality claim itself also rests on external supernova-progenitor data.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 4, paragraph beginning 'And yet, astronomers have stubbornly expected reduced mass-loss rates at lower metallicity...' (arXiv p. 13).]
    "This is despite observational evidence that the only explicit metallicity (Z) dependence of dusty winds is their gas/dust ratio (ψ ∝ 1/Z) and hence wind speed (v ∝ ψ−1/2) but not the total mass-loss rate ( ˙M ∝ Z0), as presented and tested by van Loon [33,61] and quantified in mass-loss rate recipes by [40], ˙M(Teff, L) and [39], ˙M(P, L)."

    The paper's 'observational evidence' for Mdot ∝ Z0 is imported from the author's own dust-based recipes [33,39,40,61]. In the same section the paper states dust-based rates scale as Mdot ∝ ψ^(1/2) L^(3/4) (Elitzur & Ivezić [41]); if ψ is assumed to be ∝1/Z and/or Mdot is fitted as Mdot(Teff,L) or Mdot(P,L) with no Z term, the resulting Mdot ∝ Z0 is a consequence of the adopted parametrisation, not an independent measurement. Calling this 'observational evidence' and using it to dismiss Mauron & Josselin's empirically compiled Z^0.7 as 'extremely tenuous' inverts the evidential order: the competing Z^0.7 is derived from compiled data, whereas the Z^0 conclusion is built into the calibration convention.

full rationale

This is a review rather than a new derivation, and most of its synthesis is not circular. The load-bearing circularity is concentrated in the metallicity-independence claim: the paper asserts that 'the only explicit metallicity dependence of dusty winds is their gas/dust ratio (ψ ∝ 1/Z) ... but not the total mass-loss rate (Mdot ∝ Z0)', citing van Loon [33,61] and the author's own recipes [40,39]. Those recipes either assume ψ ∝ 1/Z as the sole Z-dependence or fit Mdot without a Z term, so the Z^0 outcome is partly built into the input calibration rather than measured. The same section shows the construction explicitly via the scaling Mdot ∝ ψ^(1/2)L^(3/4). This weakens the paper's later dismissal of Mauron & Josselin's Z^0.7 and undercuts the abstract's 'overwhelming' language. However, the bimodality/fate conclusion is not wholly circular: it is supported by independent supernova-progenitor statistics (Smartt, Healy et al.) and by metallicity-independent theoretical mass-loss models (Kee et al. 2021; Fuller & Tsuna 2024), which break the full circle. On balance, one central inference reduces by construction while the other retains independent support, giving a score of 6 rather than higher.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This is a review, so the central claims rest on prior fitted parameters, domain assumptions, and one epistemic rule (assume Z^0 unless proven otherwise). The biggest burden is the assumed gas-to-dust scaling psi proportional to 1/Z that underpins the metallicity-independence conclusion; it is carried over from the author's own earlier recipes rather than independently demonstrated here.

free parameters (4)
  • Metallicity exponent in mass-loss recipe = 0 (by assumption)
    The author's conclusion that RSG mass loss is Z^0 is baked into the recipes of van Loon et al. (2005) and Goldman et al. (2017), which omit Z; the review then cites the absence of a Z term as evidence of Z^0 (Section 4).
  • Gas-to-dust ratio scaling psi = 1/Z
    Adopted from van Loon (2000) to derive Z^0 mass-loss independence and wind speed scaling v proportional to psi^{-1/2}; if this scaling is wrong, the metallicity conclusion fails.
  • Empirical luminosity exponents alpha = 0.8 to 3.5 across recipes
    The review argues that luminosity dependence is real but the scatter among fitted exponents (refs 106, 107, 74) indicates the difficulty; the argument that luminosity is a proxy for gravity depends on these fitted values.
  • Temperature exponent in van Loon et al. (2005) = -6.3
    Used in the comparison Mdot/L proportional to T^{-6} versus T^{-6.3} to support gravity/entropy origin; this exponent is a fit to dust-enshrouded RSG/AGB data.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Mass loss is a quasi-static response of a star approaching equilibrium, so underlying drivers are gravity and entropy rather than metallicity.
    Introduced in Section 2 and used throughout; not derived from first principles in this paper.
  • domain assumption Surface gravity (or escape speed) is the decisive parameter setting the mass-loss rate, with luminosity acting as a proxy.
    Section 2 and 5; argued from scaling relations but no independent derivation is given.
  • ad hoc to paper When no strong evidence exists for a metallicity dependence, one must assume it is absent (Z^0).
    Section 4, methodological rule favoring the author's prior recipes; reverses the usual burden of proof.
  • domain assumption Dust-driven winds are only possible above a minimum dust fraction achieved by pulsation and high metallicity, so low-Z RSGs lose mass via other mechanisms.
    Section 3 and 4; qualitative threshold not quantified.
  • domain assumption Empirical mass-loss recipes compiled from disparate tracers are representative enough to infer global trends.
    The whole review relies on comparing fitted recipes from de Jager, Beasor, Decin, Goldman, and others.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Red Supergiant Mass Loss and Mass-Loss Rates." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7LS6PE63

@misc{pith2026250715971,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Red Supergiant Mass Loss and Mass-Loss Rates},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7LS6PE63}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.15971}
}
read the original abstract

This review discusses the causes, nature, importance and observational evidence of mass loss by red supergiants. It arrives at the perception that mass loss finds its origin in the gravity which makes the star a star in the first place, and is a mechanism for the star to equilibrate. This is corroborated by a careful examination of various popular historical and recent empirical mass-loss rate prescriptions and theoretical works, and which provides no evidence for an explicit dependence of red supergiant mass loss on metallicity though dust-associated mass loss becomes less prevalent at lower metallicity. It also identifies a common problem in methods that use tracers of mass loss, which do not correct for varying scaling factors (often because there is no information available on which to base such correction) and as a result tend to underestimate mass-loss rates at the lower end. Conversely, dense, extended chromospheres in themselves do not translate into high mass-loss rates, and the significance of stochastic mass loss can be overstated. On a population scale, on the other hand, binary interaction acts as a stochastic agent of mass loss of great import. In all, evidence is overwhelming that points at red supergiants at the lower mass end losing mass at insufficient rates to shed their mantles before core collapse, but massive (at birth) red supergiants to be prone to intense, dusty mass loss which sees them become hotter stars before meeting their fate. This is consistent with the identified progenitors of hydrogen-rich supernovae. Supernova evolution holds great promise to probe the mass loss but we caution against confusing atmospheres with winds. Finally, promising avenues are looked into, which could forge step-change progress in what has been a long and arduous search for the holy grail of red supergiant mass loss. We may yet find it!

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.15971 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Summary of varying conditions of the boundary layer of cool supergiants, from the base through to the wind, expressed across stellar photospheric effective temperature and local gravity (a function of current mass and radial distance). Metal-poor stars will struggle or fail to occupy the top-right corner of this diagram but they will still—or instead—lose mass through the other means. Note that around K/early-M spec… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Stellar Winds Atlas II: Black Hole Formation at Solar Metallicity

    astro-ph.SR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Black hole masses at solar metallicity are set by whether a star becomes a Wolf-Rayet star before collapse, and cool supergiant winds control that split.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

141 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Evolution and mass loss of cool ageing stars: A Daedalean story

    Decin, L. Evolution and mass loss of cool ageing stars: A Daedalean story. ARA&A 2021, 59, 337–389

    2021

  2. [2]

    The pulsations of models of delta Cephei stars

    Baker, N.; Kippenhahn, R. The pulsations of models of delta Cephei stars. II. ApJ 1965, 142, 868—889

    1965

  3. [3]

    The evolution and explosion of massive stars

    Woosley, S.E.; Heger, A.; Weaver, T.A. The evolution and explosion of massive stars. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2002, 74, 1015–1071

    2002

  4. [4]

    The hydrodynamic theory of solar corpuscular radiation and stellar winds

    Parker, E.N. The hydrodynamic theory of solar corpuscular radiation and stellar winds. ApJ 1960, 132, 821–866

    1960

  5. [5]

    Dynamical theory of the solar wind

    Parker, E.N. Dynamical theory of the solar wind. Space Sci. Rev. 1965, 4, 666–708

    1965

  6. [6]

    Investigating dusty red supergiant outflows in Westerlund 1 with 3D Hydrodynamic simulations

    Larkin, C.J.K.; Mackey, J.; Haworth, T.J.; Sander, A.A.C. Investigating dusty red supergiant outflows in Westerlund 1 with 3D Hydrodynamic simulations. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2503.01272

    work page arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Radiation-driven winds in Of stars

    Castor, J.I.; Abbott, D.C.; Klein, R.I. Radiation-driven winds in Of stars. ApJ 1975, 195, 157–174

    1975

  8. [8]

    Momentum and energy deposition in late-type stellar atmospheres and winds

    Hartmann, L.; MacGregor, K.B. Momentum and energy deposition in late-type stellar atmospheres and winds. ApJ 1980, 242, 260–282

    1980

Show all 141 references
  1. [9]

    Binary interaction dominates the evolution of massive stars

    Sana, H.; de Mink, S.E.; de Koter, A.; Langer, N.; Evans, C.J.; Gieles, M.; Gosset, E.; Izzard, R.G.; Le Bouquin, J.-B.; Schneider, F.R.N. Binary interaction dominates the evolution of massive stars. Science 2012, 337, 444–446

    2012

  2. [10]

    An interferometric study of B star multiplicity

    Frost, A.J.; Sana, H.; Le Bouquin, J.-B.; Perets, H.B.; Bodensteiner, J.; Igoshev, A.P .; Banyard, G.; Mahy, L.; Mérand, A.; Ramírez- Agudelo, O.H. An interferometric study of B star multiplicity. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2505.02300

    2025 arXiv

  3. [11]

    V838 Monocerotis as seen by ALMA: A remnant of a binary merger in a triple system

    Kami ´ nski, T.; Tylenda, R.; Kiljan, A.; Schmidt, M.; Lisiecki, K.; Melis, C.; Frankowski, A.; Joshi, V .; Menten, K.M. V838 Monocerotis as seen by ALMA: A remnant of a binary merger in a triple system. A&A 2021, 655, A32

    2021

  4. [12]

    Red giants and supergiants with degenerate neutron cores

    Thorne, K.S.; ˙Zytkow, A.N. Red giants and supergiants with degenerate neutron cores. ApJ 1975, 199, L19–L24

    1975

  5. [13]

    Progenitors of core-collapse supernovae

    Smartt, S.J. Progenitors of core-collapse supernovae. ARA&A 2009, 47, 63–106

    2009

  6. [14]

    Observational constraints on the progenitors of core-collapse supernovae: The case for missing high-mass stars

    Smartt, S.J. Observational constraints on the progenitors of core-collapse supernovae: The case for missing high-mass stars. P ASA 2015, 32, 16

    2015

  7. [15]

    A Survey about nothing: Monitoring a million supergiants for failed supernovae

    Kochanek, C.S.; Beacom, J.F.; Kistler, M.D.; Prieto, J.L.; Stanek, K.Z.; Thompson, T.A.; Yüksel, H. A Survey about nothing: Monitoring a million supergiants for failed supernovae. ApJ 2008, 684, 1336–1342

    2008

  8. [16]

    Supernova 1987A revisited

    McCray, R. Supernova 1987A revisited. ARA&A 1993, 31, 175–216

    1993

  9. [17]

    Super-AGB stars and their role as electron capture supernova progenitors

    Doherty, C.L.; Gil-Pons, P .; Siess, L.; Lattanzio, J.C. Super-AGB stars and their role as electron capture supernova progenitors. P ASA2017, 34, 56

  10. [18]

    The influence of supernova remnants on the interstellar medium in the Large Magellanic Cloud seen at 20–600 µm wavelengths

    Laki´ cevi´ c, M.; van Loon, J.Th.; Meixner, M.; Gordon, K.; Bot, C.; Roman-Duval, J.; Babler, B.; Bolatto, A.; Engelbracht, C.; Filipovi´ c, M.; et al. The influence of supernova remnants on the interstellar medium in the Large Magellanic Cloud seen at 20–600 µm wavelengths. ...

    2015

  11. [19]

    The circumstellar envelope of alpha Herculis

    Deutsch, A.J. The circumstellar envelope of alpha Herculis. ApJ 1956, 123, 210–227

    1956

  12. [20]

    The age and mass of theα Herculis triple-star system from a MESA grid of rotating stars with 1.3 ≤ M/M⊙ ≤ 8.0

    Moravveji, E.; Guinean, E.F.; Khosroshahi, H.; Wasatonic, R. The age and mass of theα Herculis triple-star system from a MESA grid of rotating stars with 1.3 ≤ M/M⊙ ≤ 8.0. AJ 2013, 146, 148

    2013

  13. [21]

    Chromospheres and mass loss in metal-deficient giant stars

    Dupree, A.K.; Hartmann, L.; Avrett, E.H. Chromospheres and mass loss in metal-deficient giant stars. ApJ 1984, 281, L37–L39

    1984

  14. [22]

    Mass loss from cool stars

    Dupree, A.K. Mass loss from cool stars. ARA&A 1986, 24, 377–420

    1986

  15. [23]

    Circumstellar absorption lines and mass loss from red giants

    Reimers, D. Circumstellar absorption lines and mass loss from red giants. Mem. Soc. R. Sci. Liège 1975, 8, 369–382

    1975

  16. [24]

    Observational evidence for mass-loss from K giants, G and K supergiants

    Reimers, D. Observational evidence for mass-loss from K giants, G and K supergiants. A&A 1977, 57, 395–400

    1977

  17. [25]

    Stellar winds with non-WKB Alfvén waves

    Charbonneau, P .; MacGregor, K.B. Stellar winds with non-WKB Alfvén waves. II. Wind models for cool, evolved stars.ApJ 1995, 454, 901–909

    1995

  18. [26]

    On the magnetic structure and wind parameter profiles of Alfvén wave driven winds in late-type supergiant stars

    Falceta-Gonçalves, D.; Vidotto, A.A.; Jatenco-Pereira, V . On the magnetic structure and wind parameter profiles of Alfvén wave driven winds in late-type supergiant stars. MNRAS 2006, 368, 1145–1150

    2006

  19. [27]

    A new version of Reimers’ law of mass loss based on a physical approach

    Schröder, K.-P .; Cuntz, M. A new version of Reimers’ law of mass loss based on a physical approach. ApJ 2005, 630, L73–L76

    2005

  20. [28]

    A critical test of empirical mass loss formulas applied to individual giants and supergiants.A&A 2007, 593–601

    Schröder, K.-P .; Cuntz, M. A critical test of empirical mass loss formulas applied to individual giants and supergiants.A&A 2007, 593–601

    2007

  21. [29]

    Mass loss from M stars

    Gehrz, R.D.; Woolf, N.J. Mass loss from M stars. ApJ 1971, 165, 285–294

    1971

  22. [30]

    Discovery of hydroxyl radio emission from infrared stars

    Wilson, W.J.; Barrett, A.H. Discovery of hydroxyl radio emission from infrared stars. Science 1968, 161, 778–779

    1968

  23. [31]

    OH-IR stars

    Goldreich, P .; Scoville, N. OH-IR stars. I. Physical properties of circumstellar envelopes. ApJ 1976, 205, 144–154

    1976

  24. [32]

    Southern search for OH from M supergiants

    Bowers, P .F.; Kerr, F.J. Southern search for OH from M supergiants. AJ 1978, 83, 487–491

    1978

  25. [33]

    Mass-loss rates and dust-to-gas ratios for obscured Asymptotic Giant Branch stars of different metallicities

    van Loon, J.Th. Mass-loss rates and dust-to-gas ratios for obscured Asymptotic Giant Branch stars of different metallicities. A&A 2000, 354, 125–134

    2000

  26. [34]

    Asymptotic giant branch superwind speed at low metallicity

    Marshall, J.R.; van Loon, J.Th.; Matsuura, M.; Wood, P .R.; Zijlstra, A.A.; Whitelock, P .A. Asymptotic giant branch superwind speed at low metallicity. MNRAS 2004, 355, 1348–1360. Galaxies 2025, 1, 0 21 of 24

    2004

  27. [35]

    Circumstellar masers in the Magellanic Clouds

    van Loon, J.Th.; Zijlstra, A.A.; Bujarrabal, V .; Nyman, L.-Å. Circumstellar masers in the Magellanic Clouds. A&A 2001, 368, 950–968

    2001

  28. [36]

    Maser mapping of dust-driven winds from red supergiants

    Richards, A.M.S.; Yates, J.A. Maser mapping of dust-driven winds from red supergiants. Ir. Astron. J. 1998, 25, 7–20

    1998

  29. [37]

    MERLIN observations of water maser proper motions in VY Canis Majoris

    Richards, A.M.S.; Yates, J.A.; Cohen, R.J. MERLIN observations of water maser proper motions in VY Canis Majoris. MNRAS 1998, 299, 319–331

    1998

  30. [38]

    Maser mapping of small-scale structure in the circumstellar envelope of S Persei.MNRAS 1999, 306, 954–974

    Richards, A.M.S.; Yates, J.A.; Cohen, R.J. Maser mapping of small-scale structure in the circumstellar envelope of S Persei.MNRAS 1999, 306, 954–974

    1999

  31. [39]

    The wind speeds, dust content, and mass-loss rates of evolved AGB and RSG stars at varying metallicity

    Goldman, S.R.; van Loon, J.Th.; Zijlstra, A.A.; Green, J.A.; Wood, P .R.; Nanni, A.; Imai, H.; Whitelock, P .A.; Matsuura, M.; Groenewegen, M.A.T.; et al. The wind speeds, dust content, and mass-loss rates of evolved AGB and RSG stars at varying metallicity. MNRAS 2017, 465, 403–433

    2017

  32. [40]

    An empirical formula for the mass-loss rates of dust-enshrouded red supergiants and oxygen-rich Asymptotic Giant Branch stars

    van Loon, J.Th.; Cioni, M.-R.L.; Zijlstra, A.A.; Loup, C. An empirical formula for the mass-loss rates of dust-enshrouded red supergiants and oxygen-rich Asymptotic Giant Branch stars. A&A 2005, 438, 273–289

    2005

  33. [41]

    Dusty winds—I

    Elitzur, M.; Ivezi´ c, Ž. Dusty winds—I. Self-similar solutions. MNRAS 2001, 327, 403–421

    2001

  34. [42]

    Infrared giants vs

    Josselin, E.; Loup, C.; Omont, A.; Barnbaum, C.; Nyman, L.-Å.; Sèvre, F. Infrared giants vs. supergiants. II. CO observations. A&AS 1998, 129, 45–68

    1998

  35. [43]

    Infrared giants vs

    Josselin, E.; Loup, C.; Omont, A.; Barnbaum, C.; Nyman, L.-Å. Infrared giants vs. supergiants. I. Far infrared-to-CO(1–0) intensity-ratio. A&A 1996, 315, L23–L26

    1996

  36. [44]

    HI line observations of 290 evolved stars made with the Nançay Radio Telescope: I

    Gérard, E.; van Driel, W.; Matthews, L.D.; Le Bertre, T.; Martin, J.-M.; Riêu, N.Q. HI line observations of 290 evolved stars made with the Nançay Radio Telescope: I. Data. A&A 2024, 692, A54

    2024

  37. [45]

    Mass loss rates in the Hertzsprung—Russell diagram

    de Jager, C.; Nieuwenhuijzen, H.; van der Hucht, K.A. Mass loss rates in the Hertzsprung—Russell diagram. A&AS 1988, 72, 259–289

    1988

  38. [46]

    Parametrization of stellar rates of mass loss as functions of the fundamental stellar parameters M, L, and R

    Nieuwenhuijzen, H.; de Jager, C. Parametrization of stellar rates of mass loss as functions of the fundamental stellar parameters M, L, and R. A&A 1990, 231, 134–136

    1990

  39. [47]

    The circumstellar envelopes and chromospheres of cool giants and supergiants.ApJ 1983, 274, 286–301

    Hagen, W.; Stencel, R.E.; Dickinson, D.F. The circumstellar envelopes and chromospheres of cool giants and supergiants.ApJ 1983, 274, 286–301

    1983

  40. [48]

    Evolution of the chromospheres and winds of low- and intermediate-mass giant stars.ApJ 1991, 371, 357–379

    Judge, P .G.; Stencel, R.E. Evolution of the chromospheres and winds of low- and intermediate-mass giant stars.ApJ 1991, 371, 357–379

    1991

  41. [49]

    Dust, pulsation, chromospheres and their rôle in driving mass loss from red giants in Galactic globular clusters

    McDonald, I.; van Loon, J.Th. Dust, pulsation, chromospheres and their rôle in driving mass loss from red giants in Galactic globular clusters. A&A 2007, 476, 1261–1282

    2007

  42. [50]

    Some problems connected with mass loss in late-type stars

    Goldberg, L. Some problems connected with mass loss in late-type stars. Q. J. R. Astron. Soc. 1979, 20, 361–382

    1979

  43. [51]

    Stellar pulsation, atmospheric structure, and mass loss

    Willson, L.A.; Bowen, G.H. Stellar pulsation, atmospheric structure, and mass loss. Lect. Notes Phys. 1986, 254, 385–396

    1986

  44. [52]

    Dynamical modeling of long-period variable star atmospheres

    Bowen G.H. Dynamical modeling of long-period variable star atmospheres. ApJ 1988, 329, 299–317

    1988

  45. [53]

    On the generation of mass loss in cool giant stars due to propagating shock waves

    Cuntz, M. On the generation of mass loss in cool giant stars due to propagating shock waves. ApJ 1990, 353, 255–264

    1990

  46. [54]

    Testing a predictive theoretical model for the mass loss rates of cool stars

    Cranmer, S.R.; Saar, S.H. Testing a predictive theoretical model for the mass loss rates of cool stars. ApJ 2011, 741, 54

    2011

  47. [55]

    Analytic, dust-independent mass-loss rates for red supergiant winds initiated by turbulent pressure

    Kee, N.D.; Sundqvist, J.O.; Decin, L.; de Koter, A.; Sana, H. Analytic, dust-independent mass-loss rates for red supergiant winds initiated by turbulent pressure. A&A 2021, 646, A180

    2021

  48. [56]

    Boil-off of red supergiants: Mass loss and type II-P supernovae

    Fuller, J.; Tsuna, D. Boil-off of red supergiants: Mass loss and type II-P supernovae. Open J. Astrophys. 2024, 7, 47

    2024

  49. [57]

    Mira variables: Pulsation, mass loss and evolution

    Wood, P .R. Mira variables: Pulsation, mass loss and evolution. ASPC 1990, 11, 355–363

    1990

  50. [58]

    Evolution of low- and intermediate-mass stars to the end of the Asymptotic Giant Branch with mass loss

    Vassiliadis, E.; Wood, P .R. Evolution of low- and intermediate-mass stars to the end of the Asymptotic Giant Branch with mass loss. ApJ 1993, 413, 641–657

    1993

  51. [59]

    Pulsating AGB Stars in the LMC

    van Loon, J.Th. Pulsating AGB Stars in the LMC. ASPC 2002, 259, 548–555

    2002

  52. [60]

    Molecules and dust production in the Magellanic Clouds

    van Loon, J.Th.; Cohen, M.; Oliveira, J.M.; Matsuura, M.; McDonald, I.; Sloan, G.C.; Wood, P .R.; Zijlstra, A.A. Molecules and dust production in the Magellanic Clouds. A&A 2008, 487, 1055–1073

    2008

  53. [61]

    On the metallicity dependence of the winds from red supergiants and Asymptotic Giant Branch stars

    van Loon, J.Th. On the metallicity dependence of the winds from red supergiants and Asymptotic Giant Branch stars. ASPC 2006, 353, 211–224

    2006

  54. [62]

    The mass-loss rates of red supergiants and the de Jager prescription

    Mauron, N.; Josselin, E. The mass-loss rates of red supergiants and the de Jager prescription. A&A 2011, 526, A156

    2011

  55. [63]

    Spitzer SAGE-SMC infrared photometry of massive stars in the Small Magellanic Cloud

    Bonanos, A.Z.; Lennon, D.J.; Köhlinger, F.; van Loon, J.Th.; Massa, D.L.; Sewiło, M.; Evans, C.J.; Panagia, N.; Babler, B.L.; Block, M.; et al. Spitzer SAGE-SMC infrared photometry of massive stars in the Small Magellanic Cloud. AJ 2010, 140, 416–429

    2010

  56. [64]

    Investigating the metallicity dependence of the mass-loss rate relation of red supergiants

    Antoniadis, K.; Zapartas, E.; Bonanos, A.Z.; Maravelias, G.; Vlassis, S.; Muñoz-Sanchez, G.; Nally, C.; Meixner, M.; Jones, O.C.; Lenki´ c, L.; et al. Investigating the metallicity dependence of the mass-loss rate relation of red supergiants. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2503.05876

    2025

  57. [65]

    Investigating episodic mass loss in evolved massive stars: III

    de Wit, S.; Muñoz-Sanchez, G.; Maravelias, G.; Bonanos, A.Z.; Antoniadis, K.; García-Álvarez, D.; Britavskiy, N.; Ruiz, A.; Philippopoulou, A. Investigating episodic mass loss in evolved massive stars: III. Spectroscopy of dusty massive stars in three northern galaxies. arXiv ...

    2025 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Mass-loss rates and luminosity functions of dust-enshrouded AGB stars and red supergiants in the LMC

    van Loon, J.Th.; Groenewegen, M.A.T.; de Koter, A.; Trams, N.R.; Waters, L.B.F.M.; Zijlstra, A.A.; Whitelock, P .A.; Loup, C. Mass-loss rates and luminosity functions of dust-enshrouded AGB stars and red supergiants in the LMC. A&A 1999, 351, 559–572

    1999

  59. [67]

    The dust condensation sequence in red supergiant stars

    Verhoelst, T.; van der Zypen, N.; Hony, S.; Decin, L.; Cami, j.; Eriksson, K. The dust condensation sequence in red supergiant stars. A&A 2009, 498, 127–138. Galaxies 2025, 1, 0 22 of 24

    2009

  60. [68]

    Luminosities and mass-loss rates of SMC and LMC AGB stars and red supergiants

    Groenewegen, M.A.T.; Sloan, G.C.; Soszy ´ nski, I.; Petersen, E.A. Luminosities and mass-loss rates of SMC and LMC AGB stars and red supergiants. A&A 2009, 506, 1277–1296

    2009

  61. [69]

    The UK Infrared Telescope M 33 monitoring project—III

    Javadi, A.; van Loon, J.Th.; Khosroshahi, H.; Mirtorabi, M.T. The UK Infrared Telescope M 33 monitoring project—III. Feedback from dusty stellar winds in the central square kiloparsec. MNRAS 2013, 432, 2824–2836

    2013

  62. [70]

    The UK Infrared Telescope M 33 monitoring project—VI

    Javadi, A.; van Loon, J.Th.; Alizadeh, M., Hashemi, S.A.; Saremi, E. The UK Infrared Telescope M 33 monitoring project—VI. Feedback from dusty stellar winds across the galactic disc. Unpublished

  63. [71]

    A new mass-loss rate prescription for red supergiants

    Beasor, E.R.; Davies, B.; Smith, N.; van Loon, J.Th; Gehrz, R.D.; Figer, D.F. A new mass-loss rate prescription for red supergiants. MNRAS 2020, 492, 5994–6006

    2020

  64. [72]

    Correction to: ‘A new mass-loss rate prescription for red supergiants’

    Beasor, E.R.; Davies, B.; Smith, N.; van Loon, J.Th; Gehrz, R.D.; Figer, D.F. Correction to: ‘A new mass-loss rate prescription for red supergiants’. MNRAS 2023, 524, 2460–2462

    2023

  65. [73]

    ALMA detection of CO rotational line emission in red supergiant stars of the massive young star cluster RSG C1

    Decin, L.; Richards, A.M.S.; Marchant, P .; Sana, H. ALMA detection of CO rotational line emission in red supergiant stars of the massive young star cluster RSG C1. Determination of a new mass-loss rate prescription for red supergiants. A&A 2024, 681, A17

    2024

  66. [74]

    Exploring the mass-loss histories of the red supergiants

    Humphreys, R.M.; Helmel, G.; Jones, T.J.; Gordon, M.S. Exploring the mass-loss histories of the red supergiants. AJ 2020, 160, 145

    2020

  67. [75]

    Connecting Internal and Surface Properties of Massive Stars

    Farrell, E.J. Connecting Internal and Surface Properties of Massive Stars. Ph.D., Thesis, Trinity College Dublin, School of Physics, Dublin, Ireland, 2022

    2022

  68. [76]

    Using detailed single-star and binary-evolution models to probe the large observed luminosity spread of red supergiants in young open star clusters

    Wang, C.; Patrick, L.; Schootemeijer, A.; de Mink, S.E.; Langer, N.; Britavskiy, N.; Xu, X.-T.; Bodensteiner, J.; Laplace, E.; Valli, R.; et al. Using detailed single-star and binary-evolution models to probe the large observed luminosity spread of red supergiants in young ope...

    2025

  69. [77]

    Probing the mass-loss history of AGB and red supergiant stars from CO rotational line profiles

    Decin, L.; Hony, S.; de Koter, A.; Justtanont, K.; Tielens, A.G.G.M.; Waters, L.B.F.M. Probing the mass-loss history of AGB and red supergiant stars from CO rotational line profiles. I. Theoretical model—Mass-loss history unravelled in VY CMa. A&A 2006, 456, 549–563

    2006

  70. [78]

    The asymmetric nebula surrounding the extreme red supergiant VY Canis Majoris

    Smith, N.; Humphreys, R.M.; Davidson, K.; Gehrz, R.D.; Schuster, M.T.; Krautter, J. The asymmetric nebula surrounding the extreme red supergiant VY Canis Majoris. AJ 2001, 121, 1111–1125

    2001

  71. [79]

    HST and infrared images of the circumstellar environment of the cool hypergiant IRC+10◦420, AJ 1997, 114, 2778–2864

    Humphreys, R.M.; Smith, N.; Davidson, K.; Jones, T.J.; Gehrz, R.D.; Mason, C.G.; Hayward, T.L.; Houck, J.R.; Krautter, J. HST and infrared images of the circumstellar environment of the cool hypergiant IRC+10◦420, AJ 1997, 114, 2778–2864

    1997

  72. [80]

    The radio re-brightening of the Type IIb SN 2001ig

    Soria, R.; Russell, T.D.; Wiston, E.; Cheng, S.; Margutti, R.; Rose, K.; Ryder, S.; Terreran, G. The radio re-brightening of the Type IIb SN 2001ig. P ASA2025, 42, 50

  73. [81]

    SN 2023ixf: Interaction signatures in the spectrum at 445 days

    Folatelli, G.; Ferrari, L.; Ertini, K.; Kuncarayakti, H.; Maeda, K. SN 2023ixf: Interaction signatures in the spectrum at 445 days. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2502.10534

    2025 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Imaging the innermost circumstellar environment of the red supergiant WOH G64 in the Large Magellanic Cloud

    Ohnaka, K.; Hofmann, K.-H.; Weigelt, G.; van Loon, J.Th.; Schertl, D.; Goldman, S.R. Imaging the innermost circumstellar environment of the red supergiant WOH G64 in the Large Magellanic Cloud. A&A 2024, 691, L15

    2024

  75. [83]

    Detection of an OH/IR Star in the Large Magellanic Cloud

    Wood, P .R.; Bessell, M.S.; Whiteoak, J.B. Detection of an OH/IR Star in the Large Magellanic Cloud. ApJ 1986, 306, L81–L84

    1986

  76. [84]

    Discovery of the first extragalactic SiO maser.A&A 1996, 306, L29–L32

    van Loon, J.Th.; Zijlstra, A.A.; Bujarrabal, V .; Nyman, L.-Å. Discovery of the first extragalactic SiO maser.A&A 1996, 306, L29–L32

    1996

  77. [85]

    Discovery of H2O maser emission from the red supergiant IRAS 04553−6825 in the Large Magellanic Cloud

    van Loon, J.Th.; te Lintel Hekkert, P .; Bujarrabal, V .; Zijlstra, A.A.; Nyman, L.-Å. Discovery of H2O maser emission from the red supergiant IRAS 04553−6825 in the Large Magellanic Cloud. A&A 1998, 337, 141–144

    1998

  78. [86]

    The dramatic transition of the extreme red supergiant WOH G64 to a yellow hypergiant

    Muñoz-Sanchez, G.; Kalitsounaki, M.; de Wit, S.; Antoniadis, K.; Bonanos, A.Z.; Zapartas, E.; Boutsia, K.; Christodoulou, E.; Maravelias, G.; Soszy ´ nski, I.; Udalski, A. The dramatic transition of the extreme red supergiant WOH G64 to a yellow hypergiant. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2...

    2025

  79. [87]

    HD 144812: A transition-phase massive star in a binary system

    Kourniotis, M.; Kraus, M.; Arias, M.L.; Cidale, L.S. HD 144812: A transition-phase massive star in a binary system. MNRAS 2025, 540, L28–L33

    2025

  80. [88]

    The red supergiant problem: As seen from the Local Group’s red supergiant populations

    Healy, S.; Horiuchi, S.; Ashall, C. The red supergiant problem: As seen from the Local Group’s red supergiant populations. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2412.04386

    2025 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Grids of stellar models with rotation

    Ekström, S.; Georgy, C.; Eggenberger, P .; Meynet, G.; Mowlavi, N.; Wyttenbach, A.; Granada, A.; Decressin, T.; Hirschi, R.; Frischknecht, U.; Charbonnel, C.; Maeder, A. Grids of stellar models with rotation. I. Models from 0.8 to 120 M ⊙ at solar metallicity (Z = 0.014). A&A ...

    2012

  82. [90]

    Yellow supergiants and post-red supergiant evolution in the Large Magellanic Cloud

    Humphreys, R.M.; Jones, T.R.; Martin, J.C. Yellow supergiants and post-red supergiant evolution in the Large Magellanic Cloud. AJ 2023, 166, 50

    2023

  83. [91]

    Discovery of a dusty yellow supergiant progenitor for the type IIb SN 2017gkk

    Niu, Z.; Sun, N.-C.; Liu, J. Discovery of a dusty yellow supergiant progenitor for the type IIb SN 2017gkk. ApJ 2024, 970, L9

    2024

  84. [92]

    Missing red supergiants and carbon burning

    Sukhbold, T.; Adams, S. Missing red supergiants and carbon burning. MNRAS 2020, 492, 2578–2587

    2020

  85. [93]

    Betelgeuse, the prototypical red supergiant

    Dupree, A.K.; Montargès, M. Betelgeuse, the prototypical red supergiant. Galaxies 2025, submitted

    2025

  86. [94]

    The Great Dimming of the hypergiant star RW Cephei: CHARA array images and spectral analysis

    Anugu, N.; Baron, F.; Gies, D.R.; Lanthermann, C.; Schaefer, G.H.; Shepard, K.A.; ten Brummelaar, T.; Monnier, J.D.; Kraus, S.; Le Bouquin, J.-B.; et al. The Great Dimming of the hypergiant star RW Cephei: CHARA array images and spectral analysis. AJ 2023, 166, 78

    2023

  87. [95]

    Time evolution images of the hypergiant RW Cephei during the rebrightening phase following the Great Dimming

    Anugu, N.; Gies, D.R.; Roettenbacher, R.M.; Monnier, J.D.; Montargès, M.; Mérand, A.; Baron, F.; Schaefer, G.H.; Shepard, K.A.; Kraus, S.; et al. Time evolution images of the hypergiant RW Cephei during the rebrightening phase following the Great Dimming. ApJ 2024, 973, L5

    2024

  88. [96]

    Episodic mass loss in the very luminous red supergiant [W60] B90 in the Large Magellanic Cloud

    Muñoz-Sanchez, G.; de Wit, S.; Bonanos, A.Z.; Antoniadis, K.; Boutsia, K.; Boumis, P .; Christodoulou, E.; Kalitsounaki, M.; Udalski, A. Episodic mass loss in the very luminous red supergiant [W60] B90 in the Large Magellanic Cloud. A&A 2024, 690, A99. Galaxies 2025, 1, 0 23 of 24

    2024

  89. [97]

    NOEMA maps the CO J = 2–1 environment of the red supergiant µ Cep

    Montargès, M.; Homan, W.; Keller, D.; Clementel, N.; Shetye, S.; Decin, L.; Harper, G.M.; Royer, P .; Winters, J.M.; Le Bertre, T.; Richards, A.M.S. NOEMA maps the CO J = 2–1 environment of the red supergiant µ Cep. MNRAS 2019, 485, 2417–2430

    2019

  90. [98]

    Episodic gaseous outflows and mass loss from red supergiants

    Humphreys, R.M.; Jones, T.R. Episodic gaseous outflows and mass loss from red supergiants. AJ 2022, 163, 103

    2022

  91. [99]

    The mass-loss history of the red hypergiant VY CMa

    Humphreys, R.M.; Davidson, K.; Richards, A.M.S.; Ziurys, L.M.; Jones, T.J.; Ishibashi, K. The mass-loss history of the red hypergiant VY CMa. AJ 2021, 161, 98

    2021

  92. [100]

    The infrared-bright SW knots in the complex ejecta of VY CMa

    Humphreys, R.M.; Jones, T.R.; Davidson, K.; Richards, A.M.S.; Ravi, R.; Singh, A.P .; Ziurys, L.M. The infrared-bright SW knots in the complex ejecta of VY CMa. AJ 2025, 169, 230

    2025

  93. [101]

    Spatially resolved dusty torus toward the red supergiant WOH G64 in the Large Magellanic Cloud

    Ohnaka, K.; Driebe, T.; Hofmann, K.-H.; Weigelt, G.; Wittkowski, M. Spatially resolved dusty torus toward the red supergiant WOH G64 in the Large Magellanic Cloud. A&A 2008, 484, 371–379

    2008

  94. [102]

    Hydrodynamic simulations unravel the progenitor-supernova-remnant connection in SN 1987A

    Orlando, S.; Ono, M.; Nagasaki, S.; Miceli, M.; Umeda, H.; Ferrand, G.; Bocchino, F.; Petruk, O.; Takahashi, K.; Yoshida, T. Hydrodynamic simulations unravel the progenitor-supernova-remnant connection in SN 1987A. A&A 2020, 636, A22

    2020

  95. [103]

    The circumstellar environment around the extreme Galactic red supergiant NML Cygni: Dense, dusty, and asymmetric

    De Beck, E.; Andrews, H.; Quintana-Lacaci, G.; Vlemmings, W.H.T. The circumstellar environment around the extreme Galactic red supergiant NML Cygni: Dense, dusty, and asymmetric. A&A 2025, 698, A179

    2025

  96. [104]

    Establishing a mass-loss rate relation for red supergiants in the Large Magellanic Cloud

    Antoniadis, K.; Bonanos, A.Z.; de Wit, S.; Zapartas, E.; Muñoz-Sanchez, G.; Maravelias, G. Establishing a mass-loss rate relation for red supergiants in the Large Magellanic Cloud. A&A 2024, 686, A88

    2024

  97. [105]

    Binary Population and Spectral Synthesis version 2.1: Construction, observational verification, and new results

    Eldridge, J.J.; Stanway, E.R.; Xiao, L.; McClelland, L.A.S.; Taylor, G.; Ng, M.; Greis, S.M.L.; Bray, J.C. Binary Population and Spectral Synthesis version 2.1: Construction, observational verification, and new results. P ASA2017, 34, 58

  98. [106]

    A&ARv 1998, 9, 63–152

    Vanbeveren, D.; De Loore, C.; Van Rensbergen, W. A&ARv 1998, 9, 63–152

    1998

  99. [107]

    Evolution of massive stars under new mass-loss rates for RSG: Is the mystery of the missing blue gap solved? A&A 1999, 342, 131–152

    Salasnich, B.; Bressan, A.; Chiosi, C. Evolution of massive stars under new mass-loss rates for RSG: Is the mystery of the missing blue gap solved? A&A 1999, 342, 131–152

    1999

  100. [108]

    Evolved massive stars at low-metallicity

    Yang, M.; Bonanos, A.Z.; Jiang, B.; Zapartas, E.; Gao, J.; Ren, Y.; Lam, M.I.; Wang, T.; Maravelias, G.; Gavras, P .; et al. Evolved massive stars at low-metallicity. V . Mass-loss rate of red supergiant stars in the Small Magellanic Cloud.A&A 2023, 676, A84

    2023

  101. [109]

    Evolved massive stars at low metallicity

    Wen, J.; Gao, J.; Yang, M.; Chen, B.; Ren, Y.; Wang, T.; Jiang, B. Evolved massive stars at low metallicity. VI. Mass-loss rate of red supergiant stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud. AJ 2024, 167, 51

    2024

  102. [110]

    The effect of mass loss in models of red supergiants in the Small Magellanic Cloud

    Zapartas, E.; de Wit, S.; Antoniadis, K.; Muñoz-Sanchez, G.; Souropanis, D.; Bonanos, A.Z.; Maravelias, G.; Kovlakas, K.; Kruckow, M.U.; Fragos, T.; et al. The effect of mass loss in models of red supergiants in the Small Magellanic Cloud. A&A 2025, 697, A167

    2025

  103. [111]

    Supernovae at distances <40 Mpc: I

    Ma, X.; Wang, X.; Mo, J.; Howell, D.A.; Pellegrino, C.; Zhang, J.; Yan, S.; Arcavi, I.; Chen, Z.; Farah, J.; et al. Supernovae at distances <40 Mpc: I. Catalogues and fractions of supernovae in a complete sample. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2504.4393

    2025

  104. [112]

    Red supergiant problem viewed from the nebular phase spectroscopy of type II supernovae

    Fang, Q.; Moriya, T.J.; Maeda, K. Red supergiant problem viewed from the nebular phase spectroscopy of type II supernovae. ApJ 2025, 986, 39

    2025

  105. [113]

    The red supergiant progenitor of type II supernova 2024ggi

    Xiang, D.; Mo, J.; Wang, X.; Wang, L.; Zhang, J.; Lin, H.; Chen, L.; Song, C.; Liu, L.-D.; Wang, Z.; et al. The red supergiant progenitor of type II supernova 2024ggi. ApJ 2024, 969, L15

    2024

  106. [114]

    Probing the shock breakout signal of SN 2024ggi from the transformation of early flash spectroscopy.ApJ 2024, 970, L18

    Zhang, J.; Dessart, L.; Wang, X.; Zhai, Q.; Yang, Y.; Li, L.; Lin, H.; Valerin, G.; Cai, Y.; Guo, Z.; Wang, L.; et al. Probing the shock breakout signal of SN 2024ggi from the transformation of early flash spectroscopy.ApJ 2024, 970, L18

    2024

  107. [115]

    Circumstellar interaction in the ultraviolet spectra of SN 2023ixf 14–66 days after explosion

    Bostroem, K.A.; Sand, D.J.; Dessart, L.; Smith, N.; Jha, S.W.; Valenti, S.; Andrews, J.E.; Dong, Y.; Filippenko, A.V .; Gomez, S.; et al. Circumstellar interaction in the ultraviolet spectra of SN 2023ixf 14–66 days after explosion. ApJ 2024, 973, L47

    2024

  108. [116]

    SN 2021dbg: A luminous type IIP–IIL supernova exploding from a massive star with a layered shell

    Zhao, Z.; Zhang, J.; Li, L.; Zhai, Q.; Cai, Y.; Srivastav, S.; Wang, X.; Lin, H.; Yang, Y.; Filippenko, A.V .; et al. SN 2021dbg: A luminous type IIP–IIL supernova exploding from a massive star with a layered shell. ApJ 2024, 973, 155

    2024

  109. [117]

    Radio follow-up observations of SN 2023ixf by Japanese and Korean very long baseline interferometers

    Iwata, Y.; Akimoto, M.; Matsuoka, T.; Maeda, K.; Yonekura, Y.; Tominaga, N.; Moriya, T.J.; Fujisawa, K.; Niinuma, K.; Yoon, S.-C.; et al. Radio follow-up observations of SN 2023ixf by Japanese and Korean very long baseline interferometers. ApJ 2025, 978, 138

    2025

  110. [118]

    Asymmetries and circumstellar interaction in the type II SN 2024bch

    Andrews, J.E.; Shrestha, M.; Bostroem, K.A.; Dong, Y.; Pearson, J.; Fausnaugh, M.M.; Sand, D.J.; Valenti, S.; Ravi, A.P .; Hoang, E.; et al. Asymmetries and circumstellar interaction in the type II SN 2024bch. ApJ 2025, 980, 37

    2025

  111. [119]

    A shock crashing into confined dense circumstellar matter brightens the nascent SN 2023ixf

    Hu, M.; Wang, L.; Wang, X. A shock crashing into confined dense circumstellar matter brightens the nascent SN 2023ixf. ApJ 2025, 984, 44

    2025

  112. [120]

    The Immediate, Exemplary, and Fleeting echelle spectroscopy of SN 2023ixf: Monitoring acceleration of slow progenitor circumstellar material, driven by shock interaction

    Dickinson, D.; Milisavljevic, D.; Garretson, B.; Dessart, L.; Margutti, R.; Chornock, R.; Subrayan, B.; Hillier, D.J.; Golub, E.; Li, D.; et al. The Immediate, Exemplary, and Fleeting echelle spectroscopy of SN 2023ixf: Monitoring acceleration of slow progenitor circumstellar ...

    2025

  113. [121]

    The BTSbot-nearby discovery of SN 2024jlf: Rapid, autonomous follow-up probes interaction in an 18.5 Mpc type IIP supernova

    Rehemtulla, N.; Jacobson-Galán, W.V .; Singh, A.; Miller, A.A.; Kilpatrick, C.D.; Hinds, K.-R.; Liu, C.; Schulze, S.; Sollerman, J.; Jegou du Laz, T.; et al. The BTSbot-nearby discovery of SN 2024jlf: Rapid, autonomous follow-up probes interaction in an 18.5 Mpc type IIP super...

    2025

  114. [122]

    Inferring CSM properties of type II SNe using a magnitude-limited ZTF sample

    Hinds, K.-R.; Perley, D.A.; Sollerman, J.; Miller, A.A.; Fremling, C.; Moriya, T.J.; Das, K.K.; Qin, Y.-J.; Bellm, E.C.; Chen, T.X.; et al. Inferring CSM properties of type II SNe using a magnitude-limited ZTF sample. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2503.19969

    2025 arXiv

  115. [123]

    Infant core-collapse super- novae with circumstellar interactions from KMTNet I: Luminous transitional case of KSP-SN-2022c

    Jiang, N.; Moon, D.S.; Ni, Y.Q.; Drout, M.R.; Park, H.S.; González-Gaitán, S.; Kim, S.C.; Lee, Y.; Chang, E. Infant core-collapse super- novae with circumstellar interactions from KMTNet I: Luminous transitional case of KSP-SN-2022c. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2503.23074

    2025 arXiv

  116. [124]

    SN 2023vbg: A type IIn supernova resembling SN 2009ip, with a long-duration precursor and early-time bump

    Goto, S.; Yamanaka, M.; Nagayama, T.; Maeda, K.; Kawabata, M.; Sahu, D.K.; Singh, A.; Gangopadhyay, A.; Dkuniya, N.; Misra, K.; et al. SN 2023vbg: A type IIn supernova resembling SN 2009ip, with a long-duration precursor and early-time bump. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2504.15988

    2025 arXiv

  117. [125]

    Systematic investigation into radio supernovae with Markov Chain Monte Carlo analysis: Implications for massive stars’ mass loss and shock acceleration physics

    Matsuoka, T.; Maeda, K.; Kimura, S.S.; Tanaka, M. Systematic investigation into radio supernovae with Markov Chain Monte Carlo analysis: Implications for massive stars’ mass loss and shock acceleration physics. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2505.06609. Galaxies 2025, 1, 0 24 of 24

    2025 arXiv

  118. [126]

    Probing red supergiant atmospheres and winds with early-time, high-cadence, high-resolution type II supernova spectra

    Dessart, L. Probing red supergiant atmospheres and winds with early-time, high-cadence, high-resolution type II supernova spectra. A&A 2025, 694, A132

    2025

  119. [127]

    The optical to X-ray luminosity and spectrum of supernova wind breakouts

    Wasserman, T.; Sapir, N.; Szabo, P .; Waxman, E. The optical to X-ray luminosity and spectrum of supernova wind breakouts. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2504.00098

    2025 arXiv

  120. [128]

    Inferring dense confined circumstellar medium around supernova progenitors via long-term hydrodynamical evolution

    Matsuoka, T.; Maeda, K.; Chen, K.-J. Inferring dense confined circumstellar medium around supernova progenitors via long-term hydrodynamical evolution. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2504.14255

    2025 arXiv

  121. [129]

    The observed phase space of mass-loss history from massive stars based on radio observations of a large supernova sample

    Sfaradi, I.; Horesh, A.; Fender, R.; Rhodes, L.; Bright, J.; Williams-Baldwin, D.; Green, D.A. The observed phase space of mass-loss history from massive stars based on radio observations of a large supernova sample. ApJ 2025, 979, 189

    2025

  122. [130]

    Final moments III: Explosion properties and progenitor constraints of CSM-interacting type II supernovae

    Jacobson-Galán, W.V .; Dessart, L.; Davis, K.W.; Bostroem, K.A.; Kilpatrick, C.D.; Margutti, R.; Filippenko, A.V .; Foley, R.J.; Chornock, R.; Terreran, G.; et al. Final moments III: Explosion properties and progenitor constraints of CSM-interacting type II supernovae. arXiv 2...

    2025 arXiv

  123. [131]

    Binary progenitor systems for type Ic supernovae

    Solar, M.; Michałowski, M.J.; Nadolny, J.; Galbany, L.; Hjorth, J.; Zapartas, E.; Sollerman, J.; Hunt, L.; Klose, S.; Koprowski, M.; et al. Binary progenitor systems for type Ic supernovae. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 7667

    2024

  124. [132]

    Observational diversity of bright long-lived type II supernovae

    Nagao, T.; Reynolds, T.M.; Kuncarayakti, H.; Cartier, R.; Mattila, S.; Maeda, K.; Sollerman, J.; Pessi, P .J.; Anderson, J.P .; Inserra, C.; et al. Observational diversity of bright long-lived type II supernovae. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2504.1427

    2025

  125. [133]

    Interacting supernovae from wide massive binary systems

    Ercolino, E.; Jin, H.; Langer, N.; Dessart, L. Interacting supernovae from wide massive binary systems. A&A 2024, 685, A58

    2024

  126. [134]

    A sequence of type Ib, IIb, II-L, and II-P supernovae from binary-star progenitors with varying initial separations

    Dessart, L.; Gutiérrez, C.P .; Ercolino, A.; Jin, H.; Langer, N. A sequence of type Ib, IIb, II-L, and II-P supernovae from binary-star progenitors with varying initial separations. A&A 2024, 685, 169

    2024

  127. [135]

    Late-time supernovae radio re-brightening in the VAST pilot survey.MNRAS 2024, 534, 3853–3868

    Rose, K.; Horesh, A.; Murphy, T.; Kaplan, D.L.; Sfaradi, I.; Ryder, S.D.; Aloisi, R.J.; Dobie, D.; Driessen, L.; Fender, R.; et al. Late-time supernovae radio re-brightening in the VAST pilot survey.MNRAS 2024, 534, 3853–3868

    2024

  128. [136]

    A multiwavelength autopsy of the interacting type IIn supernova 2020ywx: Tracing its progenitor mass-loss history for 100 yr before death

    Baer-Way, R.; Chandra, P .; Modjaz, M.; Kumar, S.; Pellegrino, C.; Chevalier, R.; Crawford, A.; Sarangi, A.; Smith, N.; Maeda, K.; et al. A multiwavelength autopsy of the interacting type IIn supernova 2020ywx: Tracing its progenitor mass-loss history for 100 yr before death. ...

    2025

  129. [137]

    Reynolds, T.M.; Nagao, T.; Maeda, K.; Elias-Rosa, N.; Fraser, M.; Gutiérrez, C.; Kangas, T.; Kuncarayakti, H.; Mattila, S.; Pessi, P .J. The bright long-lived Type II SN 2021irp powered by aspherical circumstellar material interaction (II): Estimating the CSM mass and geometry...

    2025

  130. [138]

    Discovery of a variable yellow supergiant progenitor for the type IIb SN 2024abfo

    Niu, Z.; Sun, N.-C.; Maund, J.R.; Guo, Z.; Li, W.; Sun, M.; Liu, J. Discovery of a variable yellow supergiant progenitor for the type IIb SN 2024abfo. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2504.20407

    2025 arXiv

  131. [139]

    On the X-ray emission from supernovae, and implications for the mass-loss rates of their progenitor stars

    Dwarkadas, V .V . On the X-ray emission from supernovae, and implications for the mass-loss rates of their progenitor stars. Universe 2025, 11, 161

    2025

  132. [140]

    The uncertain masses of progenitors of core-collapse supernovae and direct- collapse black holes

    Farrell, E.J.; Groh, J.H.; Meynet, G.; Eldridge, J.J. The uncertain masses of progenitors of core-collapse supernovae and direct- collapse black holes. MNRAS 2020, 494, L53–L58

    2020

  133. [141]

    Physical properties of 5000 cool Large Magellanic Cloud supergiants with Gaia XP spectra: A detailed portrait of the upper H—R diagram hints at missing supernova progenitors

    Dorn-Wallenstein, T.Z.; Neugent, K.F.; Levesque, E.M. Physical properties of 5000 cool Large Magellanic Cloud supergiants with Gaia XP spectra: A detailed portrait of the upper H—R diagram hints at missing supernova progenitors. ApJ 2023, 959, 102. Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note:...

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.