Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 7 minor 186 references

A Comprehensive Analysis of Rovibrational CO in the Era of JWST

T0 review · 4 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that the CO-emitting region in the inner few AU of planet-forming disks is a ring of variable width whose outer edge is set by disk structure, not by a single temperature cutoff.

desk verdict A valuable reference survey with a central geometry claim that outruns the flagged degeneracies in its own retrievals. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.16127 v1 pith:3STFVYZ2 submitted 2025-07-22 astro-ph.SR

D. Annie Dickson-Vandervelde , Colette Salyk , Geoffrey A. Blake , Clara Ross , Adwin Boogert , Klaus Pontoppidan This is my paper
classification astro-ph.SR
keywords protoplanetarydisksCOrovibrationalemissionTTauristarsHerbigAe/BetransitionslabmodelingJWSTspectroscopyKeck-NIRSPEC
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper compiles two decades of Keck-NIRSPEC spectra of 183 young stars with disks and asks what the warm carbon monoxide gas in the inner few astronomical units can tell us about where planets form. It finds that 53% of the sample shows CO rovibrational emission, with detection rates that differ by disk subtype: 82% for transition disks, 77% for classical T Tauri stars, 61% for Herbig Ae/Be stars, and none for weak-line T Tauri stars or Class III objects. Using single-slab models to retrieve gas temperature, column density, and emitting area for 67 sources, the paper's central claim is that the CO-emitting zone is not a thin ring defined by a temperature cutoff. Instead the retrieved areas and radii imply a ring of varying size whose outer edge is likely set by disk substructure. If this holds, the inner-disk gas reservoir is bounded by physical disk structure rather than by stellar heating, which changes how JWST spectra of CO should be interpreted.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing tool is the single-temperature slab model, which treats the CO gas as a uniform slab with three free parameters—column density, temperature, and solid angle—and fits each source's rotation diagram (the curve of line flux against excitation energy) by MCMC retrieval. The solid angle is converted to an emitting area using each source's distance, and to a deprojected radius using the disk inclination, with 45 degrees adopted when no inclination is available. The geometric test compares the retrieved area with an independent inner radius derived from Keplerian line broadening, $R_{\mathrm{CO}} = GM\,(\sin i/(1.7\times\mathrm{HWHM}))^2$, and with an experimental outer radius $R_{\mathrm{out}}$ computed by assuming the area is a ring with inner radius $R_{\mathrm{CO}}$.

What would settle it

Directly resolve the CO-emitting region with spectro-astrometry or long-baseline infrared interferometry for a sample of these 67 disks. If the resolved emission is consistent with a single thin ring of constant width across stellar luminosity, or if the outer edge tracks the temperature cutoff expected from stellar luminosity, the structure-driven ring claim is refuted. A cheaper check is to refit the highest-S/N sources with a two-component narrow-plus-broad model and test whether the area-radius dispersion in Figure 17 collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is that, across 67 disks with successful slab retrievals, the CO rovibrational emitting area cannot be reproduced by a thin ring of constant width: plotting the deprojected emitting area against the Keplerian inner radius $R_{\mathrm{CO}}$ shows a positive but highly dispersed trend, with outer-to-inner radius ratios spanning roughly 1 to 50 and no tight relation of the form $A = 2\pi R\,\Delta R$ for any single width $\Delta R$. The outer radius of the CO emission shows no dependence on stellar luminosity or on the temperature cutoff that stellar heating would produce, so the paper concludes that the emitting region is a ring whose size is set by structure in the disk, such as a gap or cavity, rather than by a universal temperature boundary. The paper also reports that Herbig Ae/Be disks have cooler and larger CO-emitting regions than T Tauri disks, that CO luminosity correlates with accretion rate across the sample, and that no weak-line T Tauri star in the sample shows CO rovibrational emission.

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion rests on assuming that the area recovered from line fluxes by a single-temperature slab model is the true physical area of the CO-emitting gas, once the assumed disk inclination and ring geometry are used to convert that area into a radius.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The 67-source slab retrieval catalog provides a reference set of inner-disk CO temperatures, column densities, and emitting areas for T Tauri, Herbig, and transition disks.
  • Classical T Tauri stars are the better JWST targets for rovibrational CO because their line-to-continuum ratios are higher; Herbig non-detections should not be read as absence of CO.
  • Combining ground-based high-resolution spectra with JWST-MIRI data changes the retrieved temperature substantially, so joint fits are needed for accurate inner-disk temperatures.
  • The lack of a temperature-cutoff trend implies the outer edge of CO emission can mark a structural boundary, making CO emitting radii a useful diagnostic in searches for inner-disk gaps or planets.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the variable ring size is genuinely set by disk substructure, time-domain monitoring of CO line widths and areas could reveal inner-disk gaps or clearing events as they evolve, a testable extension the paper does not pursue.
  • The single-slab assumption and the 45-degree inclination fallback are the most fragile links in the geometry argument; refitting the highest-S/N sources with a two-component model could either strengthen or dissolve the 'no thin ring' conclusion.
  • Matching the CO outer radii against ALMA mm-dust substructure for the same sources would directly test whether the CO outer edge coincides with a particular dust gap or ring, since the paper has no spatially resolved inner-disk imaging.
  • The Table 5 line-to-continuum predictions for JWST assume the slab parameters hold at JWST resolution; verifying them with a handful of already-observed JWST targets would quickly test that assumption.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper compiles two decades of Keck-NIRSPEC M-band spectra of 183 pre-main-sequence objects, detects CO rovibrational emission in 96, presents detection statistics by disk/stellar subtype, models 67 detected sources with single-slab MCMC retrievals, and reports retrieved temperatures, column densities, and emitting areas. It argues that Herbig Ae/Be disks have cooler and larger CO-emitting regions than T Tauri disks, and that the CO emitting area is not a thin ring of constant width but a ring whose size is set by disk substructure. It closes with empirical guidance and integration-time estimates for detecting CO rovibrational lines with JWST.

Significance. If its central claim holds, the paper provides a valuable reference: a homogeneous, decades-long Keck-NIRSPEC sample with public spectra, machine-readable line fluxes, a 67-object slab retrieval catalog, and an explicit link between ground-based high-resolution data and JWST observability. The CO luminosity-accretion rate correlation and the sharp WTTS/Class III non-detections are useful empirical results that will inform JWST disk programs. The paper is also commendable for making reduced spectra publicly available and for being transparent about retrieval degeneracies in Table 3. However, the headline geometry conclusion depends on retrieved emitting areas that the paper itself flags as degenerate in many sources; the strength of the claim currently exceeds what those data support.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and §3.1] The detection statistics are internally inconsistent. The abstract reports 82% for transition disks, 61% for Herbigs, and 77% for CTTSs, while §3.1 first says that 78 confirmed Class II objects are '82% of the objects with CO emission lines detected,' then gives TTS 72% and Herbig 62%, and later gives TTS 61% and Herbig 60%. In addition, 13 of 17 transition disks is 76%, not 82%. Because the detection-rate summary is a headline quantitative result, please reconcile all numbers and state the denominators for every rate.
  2. [§4.1 and Table 2] No uncertainties are quoted for the line fluxes in Table 2, even though these fluxes feed the rotation diagrams, slab retrievals, and all subsequent correlations. The text describes Gaussian and numerically integrated fluxes but does not report a noise budget, telluric-residual error, continuum-placement error, or variability term, nor does it describe how such uncertainties were propagated into the MCMC credible intervals in Table 3. Please provide flux uncertainties and demonstrate that the retrieval results are robust to them.
  3. [§4.3, Table 3, Figures 15–17] The central 'not a thin ring' conclusion depends on retrieved emitting areas that Section 4.3 explicitly states are degenerate with column density in optically thin cases, flagged as F or T in Table 3. Several of the largest-area points are effectively unconstrained: HD 37806 (area 58 +250/-48 au^2, F), LkHA 224 (508 +760/-430 au^2), DG Tau (46.5 +240/-39 au^2), HD 244604 (45 +210/-40 au^2), and GI Tau (4.87 +140/-4.7 au^2). These points are marked with plus signs in Figure 17; if they dominate the scatter, the rejection of a thin ring and the inference of disk-substructure-dependent emission do not follow. Please repeat the geometry analysis using only sources without F/T flags, or with a model that breaks the degeneracy (e.g., including 13CO or CO 2-1 lines), and report how the conclusion changes.
  4. [§5.4 and Figure 16] The conclusion that R_out does not correlate with stellar luminosity, which is used to exclude a temperature-cutoff scenario, relies on R_out = sqrt(A/pi + R_CO^2). This quantity inherits the area degeneracy discussed above and also depends on assumed inclinations, with many sources using the 45-degree fallback marked in Table 4. Without propagating the retrieval and inclination uncertainties, the absence of a trend may be noise rather than evidence against a temperature boundary. Please provide confidence intervals on R_out and check whether the conclusion survives when degenerate sources and sources with assumed inclinations are excluded.
minor comments (7)
  1. [§2.2] The text says 151 objects have confirmed SED disk classifications, but the listed categories (120 Class II + 12 Class III + 12 debris + 17 transition) sum to 161; please correct either the total or the category counts.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract states that 53% of the sample has CO emission; 96/183 is 52.5%, so please specify the rounding convention or quote 96/183.
  3. [Figure 5 caption] The caption says 'six objects' are presented, while the text describes five example types; please align the number and the list of objects.
  4. [Table 1 references] The reference list has duplicate numbered entries, for example (17) and (24) both cite Cieza et al. 2007; please renumber and deduplicate so that citation numbers are unique.
  5. [Equation 3 and §6] Equation (3) defines t = A L^b, but the normalization A is only described as dependent on the desired S/N squared; please specify its units, how it was anchored to real data, and the exact meaning of L (continuum flux at which wavelength).
  6. [§6] The manuscript uses 'JWST-NIRSpec,' 'JWST-NIRSPEC,' and 'Keck-NIRSPEC' in ways that can confuse readers; standardize the instrument names throughout.
  7. [§4.3] The 'hot CO' TTS subtype is introduced but not defined quantitatively; please state the temperature threshold or fitting criterion used to assign this label.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the geometry claim compares independent reductions (slab-fit areas vs. line-width radii), and the JWST estimates are forward sample statistics, not derived predictions.

full rationale

The paper's central geometry claim (Sec. 5.4, Fig. 17) compares slab-retrieved emitting areas with R_CO derived from line FWHMs. These are different reductions of the same spectra: the area comes from line-flux ratios in a three-parameter slab fit, while R_CO comes from Keplerian broadening of stacked line profiles. No equation in the paper defines the area in terms of R_CO (or vice versa); the ring conversions A = pi(R_out^2 - R_in^2) and A = 2*pi*R*DeltaR are geometric scalings applied after the retrieval, not identities that force the conclusion. The flagged F/T degeneracies in Sec. 4.3 and Table 3 are statistical robustness concerns about how well the areas are constrained, not circular construction. The JWST 'predictions' (Table 5, Eq. 3) are sample statistics and empirically anchored scaling relations for future observations, not first-principles forecasts whose outputs equal their inputs. Self-citations (e.g., Salyk et al. 2011 for the 1.7xHWHM calibration, spectools_ir for the slab code) are present, but they are external empirical calibrations and code, not a uniqueness theorem or an assumption of the conclusion. Therefore no step reduces by construction; the derivation chain is self-contained.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on the slab model and literature values; the paper fits three parameters per source and uses a handful of priors, while distances, masses, accretion rates, and inclinations are taken from cited catalogs. The geometry conclusion adds ring assumptions.

free parameters (6)
  • Slab gas temperature T = 450 to 3000 K across sample (Table 3)
    Fitted per object to CO line fluxes with MCMC; central to the Herbig vs TTS temperature comparison.
  • Slab column density N = 10^14.9 to 10^19.8 cm^-2 (Table 3)
    Fitted per object; degenerate with emitting area in optically thin cases (flagged F).
  • Slab solid angle / emitting area = 0.004 to 508 au^2 (Table 3)
    Fitted per object; converted to R_ret and R_out using assumed geometry.
  • Temperature prior upper limit = 1750 K, raised to 3000 K for some TTS
    Hand-chosen maximum based on dust sublimation and CO dissociation estimates, affects hot CO TTS retrievals.
  • Assumed inclination = 45 degrees for sources without literature values
    Used to deproject emitting area and compute R_CO; noted with daggers in Table 4.
  • Integration time normalization A = not specified; depends on desired S/N squared
    Empirical normalization in Eq. 3, anchored to real Keck and JWST noise behavior; presented as a JWST guideline.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption CO rovibrational emission can be modeled as a single isothermal slab with constant column density and area.
    Sec 4.3 uses slabspec/slabfitter; this is the standard retrieval approximation and limits interpretation when lines come from multiple components.
  • domain assumption Line broadening is dominated by Keplerian rotation, so R_CO = GM (sin i / (1.7 HWHM))^2.
    Sec 4.5 adopts Salyk et al. (2011); the 1.7 factor and HWHM proxy are taken from prior work without re-derivation.
  • domain assumption The emitting area converts to radius as a circle projected by inclination, and to an outer radius via a ring A = pi(R_out^2 - R_in^2).
    Sec 4.5 and 5.4; these geometric assumptions are load-bearing for the 'not a thin ring' conclusion.
  • domain assumption Literature distances, stellar masses, accretion rates, and inclinations in Table 1 are accurate.
    Used throughout for luminosities, radii, and subtype classifications; sourced from many catalogs.
  • domain assumption Detection statistics are not dominated by selection biases, despite sample incompleteness below 0.3 Msun and at Dec < -40.
    Sec 2.2 discusses biases and compares to M23, but subtype rate differences are interpreted as intrinsic.
  • ad hoc to paper The MCMC priors do not bias the retrieved parameters.
    Priors informed by rotation diagrams; temperature ceiling raised to 3000 K for flat TTS diagrams, a choice made for this analysis.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Comprehensive Analysis of Rovibrational CO in the Era of JWST." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3STFVYZ2

@misc{pith2026250716127,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Comprehensive Analysis of Rovibrational CO in the Era of JWST},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3STFVYZ2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.16127}
}
read the original abstract

We present an analysis of CO rovibrational emission lines in the 183 infrared spectra of nearby Class II objects obtained with the NIRSPEC instrument on the Keck II telescope over the past two decades. The sample includes a broad range of stellar mass (both T Tauri and Herbig Ae/Be) and disk evolutionary states (from full to debris disks). We find that 53% of the sample has CO rovibrational emission lines present in their spectrum with disk/stellar subtype detection rates of 82% for transition disks, 61% for Herbigs, and 77% for CTTSs. Although there is no discernible difference between T Tauri and Herbig Ae/Be star CO detection rates, the detection of accretion and of CO are statistically correlated in T Tauri stars but not in Herbig Ae/Be objects. Within the sample of T Tauri stars, we find that no weak-line T Tauri stars have CO rovibrational emission lines. We use slab modeling to analyze the density, temperature, and emitting area of the sample. The retrieval results imply that Herbig Ae/Be objects tend to have cooler and larger CO emitting regions than T Tauri stars. We find that the CO emitting area is not a thin ring as defined by temperature, but a ring of varying size likely dependent on the structure of the disk. We also present guidelines on how to approach CO rovibrational emission lines in JWST spectra and present methods for linking ground-based observations with JWST spectra. This includes line-to-continuum ratio estimates based on stellar mass and accretion rate.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.16127 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Three example Keck-NIRSPEC spectra of the different stellar classes of Pre-Main Sequence (PMS) objects: Class I (blue, LDN 1489), II (purple, DR Tau), and III (green, DI Tau). These spectra include two of the echelle orders from the “M-wide” filter. The dashed gray lines represent rovibrational CO(1–0) line wavelengths from HITRAN (Gordon et al. 2022a) and the shaded pink region represents the location of the H I Pf… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Histogram of the total number of objects in each spectral class color-coded by which star forming region or group they are associated with. The majority of our targets come from Taurus or Ophiuchus. The “Other” classification includes regions or groups with only a handful of stars that meet our detection criteria, or objects with no known, or conflicting, region membership in the literature. 2.2. The Sample The samp… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Left: The collected sample from Manara et al. (2023) with declination plotted versus stellar mass; upside triangles represent objects with only an upper limit on the associated dust mass. Objects that are also within our sample are plotted with orange diamonds if we detected CO and green squares if no CO was detected. The vertical dashed line represents a stellar mass of 0.3 M⊙ and the horizontal dashed line represe… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (17 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Histogram for the differences in rovibrational CO and the H I Pfund β (Pfβ) emission detection rates separated by stellar subtype: TTS (left) and Herbigs (right). The percentage on top of each bar is relative to the total number of the stellar subtype. analysis of this…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Keck-NIRSPEC spectra that serve as examples as the 5 major types of rovibrational CO emission seen from Class II objects: strong CO CTTS (DR Tau), transition disk CTTS (DoAr 44), strong CO Herbig Ae/Be (AB Aur), weak CO Herbig Ae/Be (MWC 614), and transition disk Herbi…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Selected 12CO emission lines are listed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Histograms of the rovibrational CO emission detection rate in our sample as divided by (top left) SED classification, (top right) stellar subclass, (bottom left) TTS subtype, and (bottom right) Herbig Meeus group. The taller, empty bar represents the total number of ea…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The P(10) CO line-to-continuum ratio versus the CO Luminosity (left) and the accretion rate (right) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Left: The CO Luminosity versus the stellar accretion rates ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Generated slab models of rovibrational CO in a disk with different temperatures and column densities. In the left panel, temperature is held constant (at 1200 K), while only column density is varied from 1016.25 − 1018.75 cm−2 with steps of 0.25 in log space. The lowe…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Example rotation diagrams for the six objects presented in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Histograms for the retrieved properties for the entire sample separated by disk subtype: TTS (purple, right hatch, dashed line), Herbig (green, left hatch, dash-dotted line), and Transition (blue, vertical hatch, dotted line). From left to right, the retrieved propert…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Left: The average CO emission line width versus stellar luminosity with the stellar subtypes marked as in legend. Right: The same CO line width versus mm-dust disk inclination. The gray-shaded region represents the range of predicted broadening due to Keplerian rotati…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Left: The retrieved column densities versus the accretion rate for all sources with retrievals and accretion rates. The stellar and disk subtypes are as marked in the legend. Right: The retrieved temperatures versus the accretion rate for the sample. Poor retrievals a…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Left: Retrieved temperature versus RCO. Middle: Retrieved temperature versus Rret. Right: Retrieved temperature versus experimental outer radius, Rout. The dashed lines are the surface dust temperatures for large and small grains calculated via the prescriptions from …
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Left: Experimental radius versus stellar luminosity. The gray shaded region represents a range of excitation temperature radii cut offs, calculated from the stellar luminosity: the larger outer radii are for 250 K and the smaller outer radii for a temperature of 1500 …
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: The deprojected retrieved Emitting Area plotted against RCO, the Keplerian radius at HWHM. The purple triangles are CTTSs, the green squares are Herbigs, and the blue circles are transition disks, while objects with poor retrievals (as defined in Section 4.3) are mark…
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: The three different explanations for physical processes that could be causing the observed emitting area of the CO. In all three, the disk is represented in orange while the red, striped region represents the CO emitting area. (a) The emitting area is determined by th…
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Rotation diagram for combined Keck-NIRPSEC and JWST-MIRI rovibrataional CO data for FZ Tau. Three slab models are shown on the graph based on three different data sets the retrieval was run on: just the Keck data (teal), just the JWST data (pink), and the combination …
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Left: Integration time to reach a 3σ detection of the P(10) CO rovibrational emission line versus the continuum flux of the object at 4.75 µm. The shaded region correspond to a range of LTC ratios (0.22 to 0.50 for Keck, and 0.11 to 0.25 for JWST), representative of a…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

186 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    "֬Y =\ر#

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt \@twocolumntrue 12pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key o...

    2017

  4. [4]

    M., McLean , I

    Adkins , S. M., McLean , I. S., Fitzgerald , M. P., et al. 2016, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9908, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VI, ed. C. J. Evans , L. Simard , & H. Takami , 990805, 10.1117/12.2233759

    doi:10.1117/12.2233759 2016

  5. [5]

    M., Natta , A., Manara , C

    Alcal \'a , J. M., Natta , A., Manara , C. F., et al. 2014, , 561, A2, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322254

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322254 2014

  6. [6]

    M., Manara , C

    Alcal \'a , J. M., Manara , C. F., Natta , A., et al. 2017, , 600, A20, 10.1051/0004-6361/201629929

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629929 2017

  7. [7]

    M., Gangi , M., Biazzo , K., et al

    Alcal \'a , J. M., Gangi , M., Biazzo , K., et al. 2021, , 652, A72, 10.1051/0004-6361/202140918

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140918 2021

  8. [8]

    Andrews , S. M. 2020, , 58, 483, 10.1146/annurev-astro-031220-010302

    doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-031220-010302 2020

Show all 186 references
  1. [9]

    M., & Williams , J

    Andrews , S. M., & Williams , J. P. 2007, , 671, 1800, 10.1086/522885

    2007 doi

  2. [10]

    2016, , 585, A61, 10.1051/0004-6361/201526787

    Antonellini , S., Kamp , I., Lahuis , F., et al. 2016, , 585, A61, 10.1051/0004-6361/201526787

    2016 doi

  3. [11]

    Bailer-Jones , C. A. L., Rybizki , J., Fouesneau , M., Demleitner , M., & Andrae , R. 2021, , 161, 147, 10.3847/1538-3881/abd806

    2021 doi

  4. [12]

    P., & Eisner , J

    Ballering , N. P., & Eisner , J. A. 2019, , 157, 144, 10.3847/1538-3881/ab0a56

    2019 doi

  5. [13]

    2018, , 609, L2, 10.1051/0004-6361/201732034

    Banzatti , A., Garufi , A., Kama , M., et al. 2018, , 609, L2, 10.1051/0004-6361/201732034

    2018 doi

  6. [14]

    M., Brittain , S., et al

    Banzatti , A., Abernathy , K. M., Brittain , S., et al. 2022, , 163, 174, 10.3847/1538-3881/ac52f0

    2022 doi

  7. [15]

    M., et al

    Banzatti , A., Salyk , C., Pontoppidan , K. M., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.16255, 10.48550/arXiv.2409.16255

    2024 doi arXiv

  8. [16]

    E., Brown , J

    Bast , J. E., Brown , J. M., Herczeg , G. J., van Dishoeck , E. F., & Pontoppidan , K. M. 2011, , 527, A119, 10.1051/0004-6361/201015225

    2011 doi

  9. [17]

    2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Benisty , M., Dominik , C., Follette , K., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka , Y. Aikawa , T. Muto , K. Tomida , & M. Tamura , 605, 10.48550/arXiv.2203.09991

    2023 doi arXiv

  10. [18]

    K., Follette , K

    Betti , S. K., Follette , K. B., Ward-Duong , K., et al. 2023, , 166, 262, 10.3847/1538-3881/ad06b8

    2023 doi

  11. [19]

    A., Richter , M

    Bitner , M. A., Richter , M. J., Lacy , J. H., et al. 2008, , 688, 1326, 10.1086/592317

    2008 doi

  12. [20]

    A., & Boogert , A

    Blake , G. A., & Boogert , A. C. A. 2004, , 606, L73, 10.1086/421082

    2004 doi

  13. [21]

    J., Benisty , M., Perraut , K., et al

    Bohn , A. J., Benisty , M., Perraut , K., et al. 2022, , 658, A183, 10.1051/0004-6361/202142070

    2022 doi

  14. [22]

    D., Banzatti , A., Bruderer , S., et al

    Bosman , A. D., Banzatti , A., Bruderer , S., et al. 2019, , 631, A133, 10.1051/0004-6361/201935910

    2019 doi

  15. [23]

    1992, , 92, 481

    Bouvier , J., & Appenzeller , I. 1992, , 92, 481

    1992

  16. [24]

    Bouvier , J., Alecian , E., Alencar , S. H. P., et al. 2020, , 643, A99, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038892

    2020 doi

  17. [25]

    D., Najita , J

    Brittain , S. D., Najita , J. R., & Carr , J. S. 2009, , 702, 85, 10.1088/0004-637X/702/1/85

    2009 doi

  18. [26]

    M., Pontoppidan , K

    Brown , J. M., Pontoppidan , K. M., van Dishoeck , E. F., et al. 2013, , 770, 94, 10.1088/0004-637X/770/2/94

    2013 doi

  19. [27]

    2013, , 554, A66, 10.1051/0004-6361/201321418

    Caratti o Garatti , A., Garcia Lopez , R., Weigelt , G., et al. 2013, , 554, A66, 10.1051/0004-6361/201321418

    2013 doi

  20. [28]

    M., Esplin , T

    Carpenter , J. M., Esplin , T. L., Luhman , K. L., Mamajek , E. E., & Andrews , S. M. 2025, , 978, 117, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8ebc

    2025 doi

  21. [29]

    S., Mathieu , R

    Carr , J. S., Mathieu , R. D., & Najita , J. R. 2001, , 551, 454, 10.1086/320071

    2001 doi

  22. [30]

    M., & Eiroa , C

    Casali , M. M., & Eiroa , C. 1996, , 306, 427

    1996

  23. [31]

    M., Perez , S., et al

    Casassus , S., van der Plas , G. M., Perez , S., et al. 2013, , 493, 191, 10.1038/nature11769

    2013 doi

  24. [32]

    2021, , 507, 3789, 10.1093/mnras/stab2359

    Casassus , S., Christiaens , V., C \'a rcamo , M., et al. 2021, , 507, 3789, 10.1093/mnras/stab2359

    2021 doi

  25. [33]

    H., Mittal , T., Kuchner , M., et al

    Chen , C. H., Mittal , T., Kuchner , M., et al. 2014, , 211, 25, 10.1088/0067-0049/211/2/25

    2014 doi

  26. [34]

    I., & Goldreich , P

    Chiang , E. I., & Goldreich , P. 1997, , 490, 368, 10.1086/304869

    1997 doi

  27. [35]

    L., Stapelfeldt , K

    Cieza , L., Padgett , D. L., Stapelfeldt , K. R., et al. 2007, , 667, 308, 10.1086/520698

    2007 doi

  28. [36]

    1980, , 85, 29, 10.1086/112630

    Cohen , M. 1980, , 85, 29, 10.1086/112630

    1980 doi

  29. [37]

    Cohen , M., & Kuhi , L. V. 1979, , 41, 743, 10.1086/190641

    1979 doi

  30. [38]

    2012, , 427, 1344, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22008.x

    Costigan , G., Scholz , A., Stelzer , B., et al. 2012, , 427, 1344, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22008.x

    2012

  31. [39]

    M., & Walther , D

    Coulson , I. M., & Walther , D. M. 1995, , 274, 977, 10.1093/mnras/274.4.977

    1995 doi

  32. [40]

    A., & Russo , G

    Covino , E., Terranegra , L., Vittone , A. A., & Russo , G. 1984, , 89, 1868, 10.1086/113697

    1984 doi

  33. [41]

    1969, , 74, 375, 10.1086/110819

    Cowley , A., Cowley , C., Jaschek , M., & Jaschek , C. 1969, , 74, 375, 10.1086/110819

    1969 doi

  34. [42]

    D., Launhardt , R., et al

    Cugno , G., Pearce , T. D., Launhardt , R., et al. 2023, , 669, A145, 10.1051/0004-6361/202244891

    2023 doi

  35. [43]

    2021, , 912, 6, 10.3847/1538-4357/abebe3

    Czekala , I., Ribas , \'A ., Cuello , N., et al. 2021, , 912, 6, 10.3847/1538-4357/abebe3

    2021 doi

  36. [44]

    E., & Simon , T

    Dahm , S. E., & Simon , T. 2005, , 129, 829, 10.1086/426326

    2005 doi

  37. [45]

    E., Busfield , G., Hoare , M

    Drew , J. E., Busfield , G., Hoare , M. G., et al. 1997, , 286, 538, 10.1093/mnras/286.3.538

    1997 doi

  38. [46]

    2010, , 712, 112, 10.1088/0004-637X/712/1/112

    Duch \^e ne , G., McCabe , C., Pinte , C., et al. 2010, , 712, 112, 10.1088/0004-637X/712/1/112

    2010 doi

  39. [47]

    P., Dominik , C., & Natta , A

    Dullemond , C. P., Dominik , C., & Natta , A. 2001, , 560, 957, 10.1086/323057

    2001 doi

  40. [48]

    K., Barlow , M

    Dunkin , S. K., Barlow , M. J., & Ryan , S. G. 1997, , 286, 604, 10.1093/mnras/286.3.604

    1997 doi

  41. [49]

    1997, ESA Special Publication, Vol

    ESA , ed. 1997, ESA Special Publication, Vol. 1200, The HIPPARCOS and TYCHO catalogues. Astrometric and photometric star catalogues derived from the ESA HIPPARCOS Space Astrometry Mission

    1997

  42. [50]

    L., & Luhman , K

    Esplin , T. L., & Luhman , K. L. 2020, , 159, 282, 10.3847/1538-3881/ab8dbd

    2020 doi

  43. [51]

    L., Luhman , K

    Esplin , T. L., Luhman , K. L., Miller , E. B., & Mamajek , E. E. 2018, , 156, 75, 10.3847/1538-3881/aacce0

    2018 doi

  44. [52]

    E., Blake , G

    Evans , Neal J., I., Allen , L. E., Blake , G. A., et al. 2003, , 115, 965, 10.1086/376697

    2003 doi

  45. [53]

    J., Dunham , M

    Evans , II, N. J., Dunham , M. M., J rgensen , J. K., et al. 2009, , 181, 321, 10.1088/0067-0049/181/2/321

    2009 doi

  46. [54]

    2020, , 639, A121, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038027

    Facchini , S., Benisty , M., Bae , J., et al. 2020, , 639, A121, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038027

    2020 doi

  47. [55]

    R., Oudmaijer , R

    Fairlamb , J. R., Oudmaijer , R. D., Mendigut \' a , I., Ilee , J. D., & van den Ancker , M. E. 2015, , 453, 976, 10.1093/mnras/stv1576

    2015 doi

  48. [56]

    D., & Kriss , G

    Feigelson , E. D., & Kriss , G. A. 1983, , 88, 431, 10.1086/113328

    1983 doi

  49. [57]

    C., & Bopp , B

    Fekel , F. C., & Bopp , B. W. 1993, , 419, L89, 10.1086/187144

    1993 doi

  50. [58]

    Fernandez , M., Ortiz , E., Eiroa , C., & Miranda , L. F. 1995, , 114, 439

    1995

  51. [59]

    A., & Gabbasov , R

    Fern \'a ndez-L \'o pez , M., Zapata , L. A., & Gabbasov , R. 2017, , 845, 10, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7d51

    2017 doi

  52. [60]

    1997, , 318, 783

    Figueiredo , J. 1997, , 318, 783

    1997

  53. [61]

    F., Nisini , B., et al

    Fiorellino , E., Manara , C. F., Nisini , B., et al. 2021, , 650, A43, 10.1051/0004-6361/202039264

    2021 doi

  54. [62]

    2020, , 892, 111, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab7b63

    Francis , L., & van der Marel , N. 2020, , 892, 111, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab7b63

    2020 doi

  55. [63]

    2006, , 165, 568, 10.1086/505468

    Furlan , E., Hartmann , L., Calvet , N., et al. 2006, , 165, 568, 10.1086/505468

    2006 doi

  56. [64]

    L., Espaillat , C., et al

    Furlan , E., Luhman , K. L., Espaillat , C., et al. 2011, , 195, 3, 10.1088/0067-0049/195/1/3

    2011 doi

  57. [65]

    Gaia Collaboration , Vallenari , A., Brown , A. G. A., et al. 2023, , 674, A1, 10.1051/0004-6361/202243940

    2023 doi

  58. [66]

    Galli , P. A. B., Loinard , L., Ortiz-L \'e on , G. N., et al. 2018, , 859, 33, 10.3847/1538-4357/aabf91

    2018 doi

  59. [67]

    F., Folha , D

    Gameiro , J. F., Folha , D. F. M., & Costa , V. M. 2002, , 388, 504, 10.1051/0004-6361:20020413

    2002 doi

  60. [68]

    2006, , 459, 837, 10.1051/0004-6361:20065575

    Garcia Lopez , R., Natta , A., Testi , L., & Habart , E. 2006, , 459, 837, 10.1051/0004-6361:20065575

    2006 doi

  61. [69]

    M., Brasseur , C

    Ginsburg , A., Sip o cz , B. M., Brasseur , C. E., et al. 2019, , 157, 98, 10.3847/1538-3881/aafc33

    2019 doi

  62. [71]

    2022 b , , 277, 107949, 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2021.107949

    ---. 2022 b , , 277, 107949, 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2021.107949

    2022

  63. [72]

    N., Bouvier , J., Herbst , W., & Melnikov , S

    Grankin , K. N., Bouvier , J., Herbst , W., & Melnikov , S. Y. 2008, , 479, 827, 10.1051/0004-6361:20078476

    2008 doi

  64. [73]

    L., Espaillat , C

    Grant , S. L., Espaillat , C. C., Brittain , S., Scott-Joseph , C., & Calvet , N. 2022, , 926, 229, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac450a

    2022 doi

  65. [74]

    2019, , 632, A53, 10.1051/0004-6361/201936403

    GRAVITY Collaboration , Perraut , K., Labadie , L., et al. 2019, , 632, A53, 10.1051/0004-6361/201936403

    2019 doi

  66. [75]

    2021, , 655, A73, 10.1051/0004-6361/202141624

    ---. 2021, , 655, A73, 10.1051/0004-6361/202141624

    2021 doi

  67. [76]

    O., Riggs , Q

    Gray , R. O., Riggs , Q. S., Koen , C., et al. 2017, , 154, 31, 10.3847/1538-3881/aa6d5e

    2017 doi

  68. [77]

    1999, , 348, 570

    Guilloteau , S., Dutrey , A., & Simon , M. 1999, , 348, 570

    1999

  69. [78]

    2021, , 650, A182, 10.1051/0004-6361/202039519

    Guzm \'a n-D \' az , J., Mendigut \' a , I., Montesinos , B., et al. 2021, , 650, A182, 10.1051/0004-6361/202039519

    2021 doi

  70. [79]

    M., Shipman , R

    Heras , A. M., Shipman , R. F., Price , S. D., et al. 2002, , 394, 539, 10.1051/0004-6361:20021124

    2002 doi

  71. [80]

    Herbig , G. H. 1977 a , , 214, 747, 10.1086/155304

    1977 doi

  72. [81]

    1977 b , , 217, 693, 10.1086/155615

    ---. 1977 b , , 217, 693, 10.1086/155615

    1977 doi

  73. [82]

    H., & Bell , K

    Herbig , G. H., & Bell , K. R. 1988, Third Catalog of Emission-Line Stars of the Orion Population : 3 : 1988

    1988

  74. [83]

    H., & Kameswara Rao , N

    Herbig , G. H., & Kameswara Rao , N. 1972, , 174, 401, 10.1086/151500

    1972 doi

  75. [84]

    H., Vrba , F

    Herbig , G. H., Vrba , F. J., & Rydgren , A. E. 1986, , 91, 575, 10.1086/114039

    1986 doi

  76. [85]

    P., Warner , J

    Herbst , W., Miller , D. P., Warner , J. W., & Herzog , A. 1982, , 87, 98, 10.1086/113085

    1982 doi

  77. [86]

    Herbst , W., & Shevchenko , V. S. 1999, , 118, 1043, 10.1086/300966

    1999 doi

  78. [87]

    J., Brown , J

    Herczeg , G. J., Brown , J. M., van Dishoeck , E. F., & Pontoppidan , K. M. 2011, , 533, A112, 10.1051/0004-6361/201016246

    2011 doi

  79. [88]

    J., & Hillenbrand , L

    Herczeg , G. J., & Hillenbrand , L. A. 2014, , 786, 97, 10.1088/0004-637X/786/2/97

    2014 doi

  80. [89]

    2004, , 127, 1682, 10.1086/381908

    Hern \'a ndez , J., Calvet , N., Brice \ n o , C., Hartmann , L., & Berlind , P. 2004, , 127, 1682, 10.1086/381908

    2004 doi

  81. [90]

    A., Carpenter , J

    Hillenbrand , L. A., Carpenter , J. M., Kim , J. S., et al. 2008, , 677, 630, 10.1086/529027

    2008 doi

  82. [91]

    1982, Michigan Catalogue of Two-dimensional Spectral Types for the HD stars

    Houk , N. 1982, Michigan Catalogue of Two-dimensional Spectral Types for the HD stars. Volume\_3. Declinations -40\_ 0 to -26\_ 0

    1982

  83. [92]

    1988, Michigan Catalogue of Two-dimensional Spectral Types for the HD Stars

    Houk , N., & Smith-Moore , M. 1988, Michigan Catalogue of Two-dimensional Spectral Types for the HD Stars. Volume 4, Declinations -26 .0 to -12 .0

    1988

  84. [93]

    1999, Michigan Spectral Survey, 5, 0

    Houk , N., & Swift , C. 1999, Michigan Spectral Survey, 5, 0

    1999

  85. [94]

    M., Cleeves , L

    Huang , J., Andrews , S. M., Cleeves , L. I., et al. 2018 a , , 852, 122, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa1e7

    2018 doi

  86. [95]

    M., Dullemond , C

    Huang , J., Andrews , S. M., Dullemond , C. P., et al. 2018 b , , 869, L42, 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf740

    2018 doi

  87. [96]

    M., Lieman-Sifry , J., Flaherty , K

    Hughes , A. M., Lieman-Sifry , J., Flaherty , K. M., et al. 2017, , 839, 86, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6b04

    2017 doi

  88. [97]

    D., Oudmaijer , R

    Ilee , J. D., Oudmaijer , R. D., Wheelwright , H. E., & Pomohaci , R. 2018, , 477, 3360, 10.1093/mnras/sty863

    2018 doi

  89. [98]

    M., & Testi , L

    Isella , A., Natta , A., Wilner , D., Carpenter , J. M., & Testi , L. 2010, , 725, 1735, 10.1088/0004-637X/725/2/1735

    2010 doi

  90. [99]

    2022, , 661, A80, 10.1051/0004-6361/202142663

    Jakobsen , P., Ferruit , P., Alves de Oliveira , C., et al. 2022, , 661, A80, 10.1051/0004-6361/202142663

    2022 doi

  91. [100]

    D., Najita , J

    Jensen , Stanley K., J., Brittain , S. D., Najita , J. R., & Carr , J. S. 2021, , 133, 104402, 10.1088/1538-3873/ac21a2

    2021 doi

  92. [101]

    2004, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Kaeufl , H.-U., Ballester , P., Biereichel , P., et al. 2004, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 5492, Ground-based Instrumentation for Astronomy, ed. A. F. M. Moorwood & M. Iye , 1218--1227, 10.1117/12.551480

    2004 doi

  93. [102]

    Kamp , I., & Dullemond , C. P. 2004, , 615, 991, 10.1086/424703

    2004 doi

  94. [103]

    C., & McNeil , R

    Keenan , P. C., & McNeil , R. C. 1989, , 71, 245, 10.1086/191373

    1989 doi

  95. [104]

    2017, , 844, 168, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7c60

    Kellogg , K., Prato , L., Torres , G., et al. 2017, , 844, 168, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7c60

    2017 doi

  96. [105]

    P., Malbet , F., et al

    Kluska , J., Berger , J. P., Malbet , F., et al. 2020, , 636, A116, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833774

    2020 doi

  97. [106]

    L., Herczeg , G

    Kraus , A. L., Herczeg , G. J., Rizzuto , A. C., et al. 2017, , 838, 150, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa62a0

    2017 doi

  98. [107]

    T., P \'e rez , L

    Kurtovic , N. T., P \'e rez , L. M., Benisty , M., et al. 2018, , 869, L44, 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf746

    2018 doi

  99. [108]

    L., et al

    Labdon , A., Kraus , S., Davies , C. L., et al. 2019, , 627, A36, 10.1051/0004-6361/201935331

    2019 doi

  100. [109]

    P., Kluska , J., et al

    Lazareff , B., Berger , J. P., Kluska , J., et al. 2017, , 599, A85, 10.1051/0004-6361/201629305

    2017 doi

  101. [110]

    Levreault , R. M. 1983, , 265, 855, 10.1086/160731

    1983 doi

  102. [111]

    C., Graham , J

    Liu , M. C., Graham , J. R., Ghez , A. M., et al. 1996, , 461, 334, 10.1086/177060

    1996 doi

  103. [112]

    J., Harsono , D., et al

    Long , F., Herczeg , G. J., Harsono , D., et al. 2019, , 882, 49, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2d2d

    2019 doi

  104. [113]

    Luhman , K. L. 2007, , 173, 104, 10.1086/520114

    2007 doi

  105. [114]

    L., Allen , P

    Luhman , K. L., Allen , P. R., Espaillat , C., Hartmann , L., & Calvet , N. 2010, , 186, 111, 10.1088/0067-0049/186/1/111

    2010 doi

  106. [115]

    L., & Esplin , T

    Luhman , K. L., & Esplin , T. L. 2020, , 160, 44, 10.3847/1538-3881/ab9599

    2020 doi

  107. [116]

    L., Esplin , T

    Luhman , K. L., Esplin , T. L., & Loutrel , N. P. 2016, , 827, 52, 10.3847/0004-637X/827/1/52

    2016 doi

  108. [117]

    L., & Rieke , G

    Luhman , K. L., & Rieke , G. H. 1999, , 525, 440, 10.1086/307891

    1999 doi

  109. [118]

    L., Stauffer , J

    Luhman , K. L., Stauffer , J. R., Muench , A. A., et al. 2003, , 593, 1093, 10.1086/376594

    2003 doi

  110. [119]

    Y., & Movsesian , T

    Magakian , T. Y., & Movsesian , T. A. 2001, Astrophysics, 44, 419, 10.1023/A:1014238719048

    2001 doi

  111. [120]

    Maheswar , G., Manoj , P., & Bhatt , H. C. 2003, , 402, 963, 10.1051/0004-6361:20030315

    2003 doi

  112. [121]

    F., Ansdell , M., Rosotti , G

    Manara , C. F., Ansdell , M., Rosotti , G. P., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka , Y. Aikawa , T. Muto , K. Tomida , & M. Tamura , 539, 10.48550/arXiv.2203.09930

    2023 doi arXiv

  113. [122]

    F., Testi , L., Natta , A., et al

    Manara , C. F., Testi , L., Natta , A., et al. 2014, , 568, A18, 10.1051/0004-6361/201323318

    2014 doi

  114. [123]

    F., Natta , A., Rosotti , G

    Manara , C. F., Natta , A., Rosotti , G. P., et al. 2020, , 639, A58, 10.1051/0004-6361/202037949

    2020 doi

  115. [124]

    C., Maheswar , G., & Muneer , S

    Manoj , P., Bhatt , H. C., Maheswar , G., & Muneer , S. 2006, , 653, 657, 10.1086/508764

    2006 doi

  116. [125]

    C., et al

    Marino , S., Carpenter , J., Wyatt , M. C., et al. 2018, , 479, 5423, 10.1093/mnras/sty1790

    2018 doi

  117. [126]

    Mart \' n , E. L. 1998, , 115, 351, 10.1086/300168

    1998 doi

  118. [127]

    K., Furlan , E., Manoj , P., et al

    McClure , M. K., Furlan , E., Manoj , P., et al. 2010, , 188, 75, 10.1088/0067-0049/188/1/75

    2010 doi

  119. [128]

    McGinnis , P., Dougados , C., Alencar , S. H. P., Bouvier , J., & Cabrit , S. 2018, , 620, A87, 10.1051/0004-6361/201731629

    2018 doi

  120. [130]

    S., Becklin , E

    McLean , I. S., Becklin , E. E., Bendiksen , O., et al. 1998 b , in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 3354, Infrared Astronomical Instrumentation, ed. A. M. Fowler , 566--578, 10.1117/12.317283

    1998 doi

  121. [131]

    Meeus , G., Waters , L. B. F. M., Bouwman , J., et al. 2001, , 365, 476, 10.1051/0004-6361:20000144

    2001 doi

  122. [132]

    2013, , 771, 110, 10.1088/0004-637X/771/2/110

    Mooley , K., Hillenbrand , L., Rebull , L., Padgett , D., & Knapp , G. 2013, , 771, 110, 10.1088/0004-637X/771/2/110

    2013 doi

  123. [133]

    2006, , 644, 525, 10.1086/503381

    Mo \'o r , A., \'A brah \'a m , P., Derekas , A., et al. 2006, , 644, 525, 10.1086/503381

    2006 doi

  124. [134]

    2001, , 378, 116, 10.1051/0004-6361:20011098

    Mora , A., Mer \' n , B., Solano , E., et al. 2001, , 378, 116, 10.1051/0004-6361:20011098

    2001 doi

  125. [135]

    J., Gray , R

    Murphy , S. J., Gray , R. O., Corbally , C. J., et al. 2020, , 499, 2701, 10.1093/mnras/staa2347

    2020 doi

  126. [136]

    S., & Mathieu , R

    Najita , J., Carr , J. S., & Mathieu , R. D. 2003, , 589, 931, 10.1086/374809

    2003 doi

  127. [137]

    R., Andrews , S

    Najita , J. R., Andrews , S. M., & Muzerolle , J. 2015, , 450, 3559, 10.1093/mnras/stv839

    2015 doi

  128. [138]

    V., Kuzmin , A

    Nesterov , V. V., Kuzmin , A. V., Ashimbaeva , N. T., et al. 1995, , 110, 367

    1995

  129. [139]

    F., Schmitt , J

    Neuhaeuser , R., Sterzik , M. F., Schmitt , J. H. M. M., Wichmann , R., & Krautter , J. 1995, , 297, 391

    1995

  130. [140]

    H., & Azatyan , N

    Nikoghosyan , E. H., & Azatyan , N. M. 2019, , 36, e039, 10.1017/pasa.2019.32

    2019 doi

  131. [141]

    J., Ramsey , L., Welty , A

    Patterer , R. J., Ramsey , L., Welty , A. D., & Huenemoerder , D. P. 1993, , 105, 1519, 10.1086/116531

    1993 doi

  132. [142]

    J., & Mamajek , E

    Pecaut , M. J., & Mamajek , E. E. 2016, , 461, 794, 10.1093/mnras/stw1300

    2016 doi

  133. [143]

    R., McCollum , B., van den Ancker , M

    P \'e rez , M. R., McCollum , B., van den Ancker , M. E., & Joner , M. D. 2008, , 486, 533, 10.1051/0004-6361:200809933

    2008 doi

  134. [144]

    B., et al

    P \'e rez , S., Hales , A., Liu , H. B., et al. 2020, , 889, 59, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5c1b

    2020 doi

  135. [145]

    D., Duch \^e ne , G., Kalas , P., & Graham , J

    Perrin , M. D., Duch \^e ne , G., Kalas , P., & Graham , J. R. 2006, , 645, 1272, 10.1086/504510

    2006 doi

  136. [146]

    P., Kurosawa , R., Romanova , M

    Petrov , P. P., Kurosawa , R., Romanova , M. M., et al. 2014, , 442, 3643, 10.1093/mnras/stu1131

    2014 doi

  137. [147]

    2018, , 859, 32, 10.3847/1538-4357/aabf94

    Pinilla , P., Tazzari , M., Pascucci , I., et al. 2018, , 859, 32, 10.3847/1538-4357/aabf94

    2018 doi

  138. [148]

    M., Blake , G

    Pontoppidan , K. M., Blake , G. A., & Smette , A. 2011, , 733, 84, 10.1088/0004-637X/733/2/84

    2011 doi

  139. [149]

    M., Salyk , C., Bergin , E

    Pontoppidan , K. M., Salyk , C., Bergin , E. A., et al. 2014, in Protostars and Planets VI, ed. H. Beuther , R. S. Klessen , C. P. Dullemond , & T. Henning , 363--385, 10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch016

    2014 doi

  140. [150]

    M., Salyk , C., Blake , G

    Pontoppidan , K. M., Salyk , C., Blake , G. A., et al. 2010, , 720, 887, 10.1088/0004-637X/720/1/887

    2010 doi

  141. [151]

    M., Salyk , C., Banzatti , A., et al

    Pontoppidan , K. M., Salyk , C., Banzatti , A., et al. 2024, , 963, 158, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad20f0

    2024 doi

  142. [152]

    2016, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Rayner , J., Tokunaga , A., Jaffe , D., et al. 2016, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9908, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VI, ed. C. J. Evans , L. Simard , & H. Takami , 990884, 10.1117/12.2232064

    2016 doi

  143. [153]

    Rei , A. C. S., Petrov , P. P., & Gameiro , J. F. 2018, , 610, A40, 10.1051/0004-6361/201731444

    2018 doi

  144. [154]

    Ricci , L., Testi , L., Natta , A., & Brooks , K. J. 2010, , 521, A66, 10.1051/0004-6361/201015039

    2010 doi

  145. [155]

    F., et al

    Riviere-Marichalar , P., M \'e nard , F., Thi , W. F., et al. 2012, , 538, L3, 10.1051/0004-6361/201118448

    2012 doi

  146. [156]

    A., Williams , J

    Ru \' z-Rodr \' guez , D., Cieza , L. A., Williams , J. P., et al. 2018, , 478, 3674, 10.1093/mnras/sty1351

    2018 doi

  147. [157]

    Rydgren , A. E. 1980, , 85, 438, 10.1086/112693

    1980 doi

  148. [158]

    2022, csalyk/spectools\_ir: First release, v1.0.0, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.5818682

    Salyk, C. 2022, csalyk/spectools\_ir: First release, v1.0.0, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.5818682

    2022 doi

  149. [159]

    A., Boogert , A

    Salyk , C., Blake , G. A., Boogert , A. C. A., & Brown , J. M. 2007, , 655, L105, 10.1086/512012

    2007 doi

  150. [160]

    2009, , 699, 330, 10.1088/0004-637X/699/1/330

    ---. 2009, , 699, 330, 10.1088/0004-637X/699/1/330

    2009 doi

  151. [161]

    2011, , 743, 112, 10.1088/0004-637X/743/2/112

    ---. 2011, , 743, 112, 10.1088/0004-637X/743/2/112

    2011 doi

  152. [162]

    J., Brown , J

    Salyk , C., Herczeg , G. J., Brown , J. M., et al. 2013, , 769, 21, 10.1088/0004-637X/769/1/21

    2013 doi

  153. [163]

    2008, , 487, 965, 10.1051/0004-6361:200810081

    Sestito , P., Palla , F., & Randich , S. 2008, , 487, 965, 10.1051/0004-6361:200810081

    2008 doi

  154. [164]

    2020, , 641, A35, 10.1051/0004-6361/202037511

    Siebenmorgen , R., Kre owski , J., Smoker , J., Galazutdinov , G., & Bagnulo , S. 2020, , 641, A35, 10.1051/0004-6361/202037511

    2020 doi

  155. [165]

    1949, , 109, 92, 10.1086/145107

    Struve , O., & Rudkj bing , M. 1949, , 109, 92, 10.1086/145107

    1949 doi

  156. [166]

    W., Guilloteau , S., Pi \'e tu , V., et al

    Tang , Y. W., Guilloteau , S., Pi \'e tu , V., et al. 2012, , 547, A84, 10.1051/0004-6361/201219414

    2012 doi

  157. [167]

    F., Grant , S

    Temmink , M., van Dishoeck , E. F., Grant , S. L., et al. 2024, , 686, A117, 10.1051/0004-6361/202348911

    2024 doi

  158. [168]

    F., et al

    Testi , L., Natta , A., Manara , C. F., et al. 2022, , 663, A98, 10.1051/0004-6361/202141380

    2022 doi

  159. [169]

    F., Kamp , I., Woitke , P., et al

    Thi , W. F., Kamp , I., Woitke , P., et al. 2013, , 551, A49, 10.1051/0004-6361/201219210

    2013 doi

  160. [170]

    C., Welch , D

    Tisserand , P., Clayton , G. C., Welch , D. L., et al. 2013, , 551, A77, 10.1051/0004-6361/201220713

    2013 doi

  161. [171]

    Torres , C. A. O., Quast , G. R., da Silva , L., et al. 2006, , 460, 695, 10.1051/0004-6361:20065602

    2006 doi

  162. [172]

    G., Miotello , A., Facchini , S., et al

    Ubeira Gabellini , M. G., Miotello , A., Facchini , S., et al. 2019, , 486, 4638, 10.1093/mnras/stz1138

    2019 doi

  163. [173]

    2018, , 156, 63, 10.3847/1538-3881/aacbd1

    Uyama , T., Hashimoto , J., Muto , T., et al. 2018, , 156, 63, 10.3847/1538-3881/aacbd1

    2018 doi

  164. [174]

    2023, European Physical Journal Plus, 138, 225, 10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-03628-0

    van der Marel , N. 2023, European Physical Journal Plus, 138, 225, 10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-03628-0

    2023 doi

  165. [175]

    W., van Terwisga , S., et al

    van der Marel , N., Verhaar , B. W., van Terwisga , S., et al. 2016, , 592, A126, 10.1051/0004-6361/201628075

    2016 doi

  166. [176]

    Vieira , S. L. A., Corradi , W. J. B., Alencar , S. H. P., et al. 2003, , 126, 2971, 10.1086/379553

    2003 doi

  167. [177]

    D., Baines , D., Mendigut \' a , I., & P \'e rez-Mart \' nez , R

    Vioque , M., Oudmaijer , R. D., Baines , D., Mendigut \' a , I., & P \'e rez-Mart \' nez , R. 2018, , 620, A128, 10.1051/0004-6361/201832870

    2018 doi

  168. [178]

    2023, , 166, 183, 10.3847/1538-3881/acf75f

    Vioque , M., Cavieres , M., Pantaleoni Gonz \'a lez , M., et al. 2023, , 166, 183, 10.3847/1538-3881/acf75f

    2023 doi

  169. [179]

    M., Vrba , F

    Walter , F. M., Vrba , F. J., Mathieu , R. D., Brown , A., & Myers , P. C. 1994, , 107, 692, 10.1086/116889

    1994 doi

  170. [180]

    A., Zuckerman , B., Platais , I., et al

    Webb , R. A., Zuckerman , B., Platais , I., et al. 1999, , 512, L63, 10.1086/311856

    1999 doi

  171. [181]

    W., Glasse , A., et al

    Wells , M., Pel , J. W., Glasse , A., et al. 2015, , 127, 646, 10.1086/682281

    2015 doi

  172. [182]

    R., & Banzatti , A

    Wheeler III , C., Hinkel , N. R., & Banzatti , A. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.13308. 2411.13308

    2024 arXiv

  173. [183]

    J., & Ghez , A

    White , R. J., & Ghez , A. M. 2001, , 556, 265, 10.1086/321542

    2001 doi

  174. [184]

    D., Fairlamb , J

    Wichittanakom , C., Oudmaijer , R. D., Fairlamb , J. R., et al. 2020, , 493, 234, 10.1093/mnras/staa169

    2020 doi

  175. [185]

    Wichmann , R., Krautter , J., Schmitt , J. H. M. M., et al. 1996, , 312, 439

    1996

  176. [186]

    A., Meyer , M

    Wilking , B. A., Meyer , M. R., Robinson , J. G., & Greene , T. P. 2005, , 130, 1733, 10.1086/432758

    2005 doi

  177. [187]

    2023, , 267, 7, 10.3847/1538-4365/acd84b

    Zhang , J., Zhang , Y., Kang , Z., Li , C., & Zhao , Y. 2023, , 267, 7, 10.3847/1538-4365/acd84b

    2023 doi

  178. [188]

    2012, , 758, 77, 10.1088/0004-637X/758/2/77

    Zuckerman , B., & Song , I. 2012, , 758, 77, 10.1088/0004-637X/758/2/77

    2012 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.