Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 48 references

Single-layer silicon metalens for broadband achromatic focusing and wide field of view

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read A single-layer silicon metalens holds its focal length nearly fixed across 1.5–1.6 µm and over an 86° field of view.

desk verdict The experimental core is a genuine first for a propagation-phase-only singlet, but the paper's own Fourier analysis shows the effective numerical aperture is far below the claimed 0.8, so the headline should be scaled back. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.16366 v1 pith:WHZFK2MR submitted 2025-07-22 physics.optics

classification physics.optics
keywords metalensachromaticfocusingwidefieldofviewdispersionengineeringpropagationphasequadraticprofileRCWAnear-infraredoptics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Metalenses usually trade chromatic correction against angular acceptance: designs that focus one wavelength over a wide field of view lose focus when the wavelength changes, and designs that correct color often need stacked layers or circular polarization. This paper reports a single-layer silicon lens meant to avoid that trade-off. The authors take a quadratic phase profile, which by itself focuses over nearly 180°, and then choose, at every pixel, the rectangular silicon pillar whose wavelength-dependent phase delay best holds the focal length fixed across 1.5–1.6 µm. The fabricated lens keeps the focal distance within 1.3% of 90 µm over that band, a tenfold reduction in focal drift compared with the same quadratic design without dispersion engineering, while still focusing over an 86° field of view. The result points toward achromatic wide-angle focusing in one planar layer that does not rely on geometric phase or require circularly polarized illumination, which matters for beam steering and, with further scaling, for visible imaging.

What carries the argument

The design rests on the quadratic phase profile $\phi(r,\lambda) = -\pi n_f r^2/(\lambda f)$ combined with a dispersion-engineering selection rule: at each lens position, the rectangular silicon pillar is chosen to minimize the phase error averaged over five wavelengths, $\mathbb{E}_i\{\Phi_{\mathrm{meta}}(\lambda_i,r)-\Phi_{\mathrm{target}}(\lambda_i,r)\}$. The quadratic profile is the wide-field-of-view base, and its $1/\lambda$ dependence is what makes the focal length chromatic; the selection rule compensates that dependence by assigning each position a pillar whose phase-versus-wavelength slope differs from the naive target. RCWA supplies the per-pillar phase and transmission maps for 700-nm-tall pillars with a fixed 650 nm period, and the locally periodic approximation lets those per-pillar values be placed point by point. A Fourier analysis of the output field then converts the discrete library's phase noise into a predicted field-of-view cutoff.

What would settle it

Measure the focal length at wavelengths outside the demonstrated band, for example at 1.45 µm and 1.65 µm, with a setup whose axial resolution beats 0.5 µm; if the relative focal shift jumps beyond a few percent, the achromatic correction is limited to the demonstrated range. A second check is a full-wave simulation of the actual 240 µm structure without the locally periodic approximation; agreement with the measured 1.3% focal shift would confirm the pointwise design rule.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that dispersion engineering of a quadratic phase profile, implemented only through propagation phase in waveguide-like silicon pillars, can simultaneously suppress longitudinal and transverse chromatic aberrations in a single-layer metalens. Experimentally, the broadband metalens shows a relative focal shift as low as 1.3% across 100 nm and a field of view of ±43°, while the reference single-wavelength metalens shows a ten times larger focal shift over the same band and a nearly full ±90° field of view. Fourier analysis of the outgoing field explains the reduced field of view: matching a wavelength-dependent phase target with a finite meta-atom library introduces phase noise that shrinks the spatial spectrum inside the propagation region, cutting the field of view to about ±43.8°, in close agreement with measurement. The paper further reports that the reduced chromatic aberration roughly doubles the focusing efficiency relative to the reference because the focal spot stays in focus across the band.

Load-bearing premise

The design assumes that each 650 nm silicon pillar behaves as it would in an infinite periodic array, so the RCWA-computed phase delay can be assigned to every lens position without accounting for how neighboring pillars alter each other's response.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single-layer metalens, made with a standard lithography and etch process, can offer simultaneous achromatic focusing and wide-angle operation, removing the need for doublets or multilayer stacks in the demonstrated near-infrared band.
  • For beam steering, the focal-plane position stays almost fixed when the source wavelength is tuned, so a scanned beam does not drift out of focus, and the transverse focal shift remains nearly wavelength-independent.
  • Focusing efficiency over the band roughly doubles relative to the uncorrected quadratic lens, because the focal spot no longer walks out of the integration region as the wavelength changes.
  • The measured field-of-view cutoff matches the Fourier prediction, giving a diagnostic for future designs: the spatial-spectrum amplitude inside the propagation region determines how far the field of view can extend.
  • The same dispersion-engineering procedure provides a template for extending achromatic wide-field-of-view metalenses toward visible wavelengths with appropriately scaled pillar geometries.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: the phase-noise mechanism implies an explicit trade-off curve—constraining more wavelengths with a fixed library should narrow the usable field of view, and sweeping library size at fixed bandwidth would test whether the ±43.8° cutoff moves toward 180°.
  • Beyond the paper: because the design uses only propagation phase in rectangular pillars and no geometric phase, a symmetric unit cell could plausibly produce polarization-independent operation, though the paper does not demonstrate that.
  • Beyond the paper: the 1.3% figure is quoted as setup-limited, so measuring beyond 1.6 µm with a wider-range tunable source would reveal whether the achromatic correction persists, degrades, or was an artifact of the narrow measured band.
  • Beyond the paper: applying the same multi-wavelength phase-error minimization to spherical or polynomial base profiles, rather than quadratic, may recover some focusing efficiency lost to phase noise while retaining a wide field of view.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the design, fabrication, and characterization of a single-layer silicon metalens that combines a quadratic phase profile with propagation-phase-only dispersion engineering. Meta-atoms are chosen by minimizing the phase error at five wavelengths, and the fabricated device with nominal NA = 0.8 and f = 90 µm shows a relative focal shift of 1.3% over 1.5–1.6 µm, an 86° field of view, and improved focusing efficiency relative to a single-wavelength quadratic reference metalens. A Fourier analysis of the computed outgoing field is used to explain the field-of-view cutoff at ±43.8°.

Significance. If the reported performance is taken at face value, the work is significant because it demonstrates a singlet, polarization-independent, propagation-phase-only metalens with simultaneous broadband achromatic focusing and a wide field of view, using standard nanofabrication. The paper's strengths include a same-process reference metalens, a quantitative Fourier explanation of the field-of-view cutoff, and efficiency measurements across the band. However, the significance is substantially conditioned on the effective numerical aperture actually achieved; the paper's own Fourier analysis indicates that the broadband lens's angular spectrum is concentrated near kx = 0, which suggests that the demonstrated achromatic performance may correspond to an effective aperture well below the nominal NA = 0.8.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section IV, Fig. 9(a); Section III, efficiency paragraph] The Fourier spectrum of the broadband metalens is reported to be 'essentially concentrated around kx = 0, with nearly zero amplitude for different kx values, despite the design numerical aperture was maintained at NA = 0.8.' This is a direct admission that the outer zones of the 240 µm aperture do not contribute coherently to the focus, so the demonstrated 1.3% relative focal shift and the <2% normalized relative focal shift in Fig. 6(b) correspond to a substantially smaller effective numerical aperture, not to NA = 0.8. The measured focal spot radius of about 2 µm at λ = 1.55 µm is consistent with an effective NA near 0.5 rather than 0.8. The authors should determine and report the effective NA (for example, from encircled energy or from the focal spot size relative to the diffraction limit) and, for the comparison in Fig. 6, either match the effective NA of the reference or state explicitly that the achromaticity claim applies to a reduced aperture.
  2. [Section III, Fig. 8] The focusing-efficiency comparison between the broadband and single-wavelength metalenses is not apples-to-apples if the two devices have different effective numerical apertures. The efficiency is defined as the energy within a circle three times the focal spot radius divided by the background signal; if the broadband lens has a larger spot because of its reduced effective NA, the larger integration circle can inflate the measured efficiency relative to a full-NA reference. The authors should either compare efficiency at matched effective NA or normalize by the diffraction-limited throughput of the actual NA, and they should report the focal-spot radii for both devices at each wavelength.
  3. [Section V, Conclusions] The conclusion states that the work demonstrates 'focusing up to a field of view of ±43° and a relative focal length shift as low as 1.3%, an order-of-magnitude reduction compared to a conventional quadratic metalens.' Because the broadband lens's spatial spectrum is concentrated near kx = 0, the order-of-magnitude reduction is not established for a matched NA; the comparison is against a reference that uses its full aperture. The authors should restate the conclusion in terms of the effective aperture and explicitly discuss the tradeoff between chromatic correction, numerical aperture, and field of view, rather than presenting the three achievements as simultaneous high-NA results.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 1(b) caption] The caption contains the typo 'wide filed of view'; it should read 'wide field of view'.
  2. [Section II, Eq. (3)] The notation 'Ei{...}' used for the average over wavelengths is not defined; an explicit expression, such as (1/5)Σᵢ, would be clearer.
  3. [Section IV] The word 'concentered' should be 'concentrated', and 'titled' appears several times where 'tilted' is intended, for example in the sentence describing the tilting of the incident plane wave.
  4. [Fig. 6(a)] The axis label 'variation of the focal distance as a function of the wavelength at λ = 1.55 µm' is confusing; clarify that the plotted quantity is the relative focal-length shift with respect to the value at 1.55 µm.
  5. [References to supplementary material] The paper refers to 'Table 1 of the supplementary information document' and 'Table S1 of the supplementary information document' inconsistently; unify the labeling.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the design optimization, experimental validation, and Fourier FOV analysis are self-contained.

full rationale

No significant circularity was found. The broadband metalens is designed by minimizing the phase error relative to a quadratic target profile at five wavelengths (Eq. 3), and the reported 1.3% relative focal shift is a measured quantity obtained by locating foci in the fabricated device, not a parameter fitted to the data. The reference single-wavelength design provides an independent baseline, and the comparison between the two is a direct experimental outcome. The +/-43 degree field-of-view limit is not an input: it is computed from the Fourier spectrum of the designed metalens (Fig. 9) and then compared with the experimentally observed angular cutoff, so it is a prediction rather than a constraint. The locally periodic RCWA assumption is stated explicitly and is supported by the agreement between the Fourier analysis and the experimental field-of-view cutoff. The paper cites its own earlier work [20] in a list supporting the well-established wide-field-of-view property of quadratic phase profiles, but that point is also supported by external references [28,31,32,37], so the self-citation is not load-bearing. No load-bearing claims reduce to their own inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central design rests on standard locally periodic metasurface simulation and a quadratic phase starting point, plus the paper-specific assumption that five-wavelength phase-error averaging will control continuous-band chromatic aberration. No new physical entities are introduced. The listed design parameters, period, height, and focal length, are explicit choices rather than hidden fits, but they set the operating point of the demonstration.

free parameters (4)
  • Period p = 650 nm
    Chosen to sample the wavefront at a subwavelength pitch while keeping pillar gaps above 150 nm. It sets the spatial-frequency cutoff |kx/k0| < 1.2 and directly influences the field-of-view limit.
  • Pillar height H = 700 nm
    Fixed so that the rectangular silicon pillars provide 2 pi phase coverage with transmission above 0.5 across 1.5-1.6 micrometers.
  • Designed focal length f = 90 micrometers
    The design target for all metalenses; all relative focal shift metrics are normalized to this value.
  • Wavelength sampling set = five wavelengths in 1.5-1.6 micrometers, exact values not listed
    The phase-error average in Equation (3) uses a finite set; the paper specifies five wavelengths but not their exact spacing, and the achromatic bandwidth claim depends on this sampling.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Locally periodic approximation: each meta-atom is simulated with RCWA as part of an infinite periodic array (Section II).
    The full lens couples neighboring pillars; the design assumes nonlocal coupling is negligible, which the authors cite as standard for waveguide-like meta-atoms but do not verify independently.
  • domain assumption TE-polarized incident light is assumed in the meta-atom library and lens simulation (Section II).
    The fabricated lens is presented as a general metalens, but rectangular pillars are birefringent; no TM-polarization or unpolarized-light data are given.
  • standard math Quadratic phase profile yields wide field of view and the focal shift relation delta-x = -n_i f sin(theta_i) (Equation 2).
    This is a known result from prior metalens literature and is used as the starting point.
  • ad hoc to paper Minimizing phase error averaged over five wavelengths is sufficient to maintain constant focal length across the continuous 1.5-1.6 micrometer band (Equation 3).
    The choice of five discrete wavelengths and the mean-error metric is the proposed design strategy; its adequacy is demonstrated empirically rather than derived.
  • domain assumption Refractive index of focusing region n_f = 1 (air).
    The metalens focuses into air, so the propagation wave number in Equation (1) uses n_f = 1.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Single-layer silicon metalens for broadband achromatic focusing and wide field of view." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WHZFK2MR

@misc{pith2026250716366,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Single-layer silicon metalens for broadband achromatic focusing and wide field of view},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WHZFK2MR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.16366}
}
abstract

Achieving simultaneous broadband achromatic focusing and a wide field of view remains a significant challenge for metalenses. In this work, we begin with a quadratic phase profile, enabling full field-of-view designs, and apply dispersion engineering to minimize variations of the focal length across wavelengths, thereby substantially reducing both longitudinal and transverse chromatic aberrations. This is accomplished using only the propagation phase in waveguide-like rectangular meta-atoms, without relying on geometric phase contributions. The fabricated singlet metalens experimentally demonstrates a field of view of 86{\textdegree}, along with a tenfold reduction in focal length variations with wavelength compared to a conventional quadratic metalens, achieving a measured relative shift as low as 1.3% across the 1.5 $\mu$m - 1.6 $\mu$m range (limited by our experimental setup). This improvement also leads to a twofold increase in focusing efficiency relative to the reference metalens. These experimental results validate the effectiveness of our design strategy in simultaneously enhancing the operational bandwidth and field of view of metalenses. The demonstrated performance can directly benefit beam steering applications in the near-infrared wavelength range and provides a path toward achromatic, wide field-of-view metalenses in the visible range for imaging systems

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.16366 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Achromatic and wide field of view metalens. (a) Pictorial representation of the metalens operation. In the inset, a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Phase delay and transmission efficiency of the meta-atoms. (a) - (c) Map of the phase delay imparted by meta-atoms [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Metalens phase profile matching. (a) - (c) Phase profile for a reference single-wavelength design metalens at three [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Fabricated metalenses. (a) Optical image of a fabricated chip with several test metalenses. (b) An SEM image of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Experimental characterization of the metalens focusing. (a-c) Results for the broadband metalens with NA = 0.8 and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Performance of the broadband and single wavelength metalens under normal illumination. (a) Relative shift of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Focal shift under tilted illumination. Figures report on the transversal focal shifts along the x-axis when the incidence [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Metalenses efficiency. (a) Focusing efficiency at normal incidence for the broadband (red line with diamond markers) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Fourier transform spectra of the electric field after the metalenses along the normalized [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Lalanne, S

    P. Lalanne, S. Astilean, P. Chavel, E. Cambril, and H. Launois, Design and fabrication of blazed binary diffractive elements with sampling periods smaller than the structural cutoff, JOSA A16, 1143 (1999)

  2. [2]

    N. Yu, P. Genevet, M. A. Kats, F. Aieta, J.-P. Tetienne, F. Capasso, and Z. Gaburro, Light propagation with phase discontinuities: generalized laws of reflection and refraction, science334, 333 (2011)

  3. [3]

    Yu and F

    N. Yu and F. Capasso, Flat optics with designer metasurfaces, Nature materials13, 139 (2014)

  4. [4]

    W. T. Chen, A. Y. Zhu, V. Sanjeev, M. Khorasaninejad, Z. Shi, E. Lee, and F. Capasso, A broadband achromatic metalens for focusing and imaging in the visible, Nature nanotechnology13, 220 (2018)

  5. [5]

    S. Teng, Q. Zhang, H. Wang, L. Liu, and H. Lv, Conversion between polarization states based on a metasurface, Photonics Research 7, 246 (2019)

  6. [6]

    In particular, Fig. 6(a) reports on the variation of the focal distance as a function of the wavelength atλ = 1.55 µm (relative focal shift) for broadband and single wavelength metalenses with NA = 0.8 andf = 90 µm. The error bar is calculated as∆u = ∆σ/ √ 3, where ∆u is the measurement error and∆σ is the measurement uncertainty of 1 µm coming from the ex...

  7. [7]

    Aieta, P

    F. Aieta, P. Genevet, N. Yu, M. A. Kats, Z. Gaburro, and F. Capasso, Out-of-plane reflection and refraction of light by anisotropic optical antenna metasurfaces with phase discontinuities, Nano letters12, 1702 (2012)

  8. [8]

    X. Su, C. Ouyang, N. Xu, W. Cao, X. Wei, G. Song, J. Gu, Z. Tian, J. F. O’Hara, J. Han,et al., Active metasurface terahertz deflector with phase discontinuities, Optics express23, 27152 (2015)

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    Balthasar Mueller, N

    J. Balthasar Mueller, N. A. Rubin, R. C. Devlin, B. Groever, and F. Capasso, Metasurface polarization optics: independent phase control of arbitrary orthogonal states of polarization, Physical review letters118, 113901 (2017)

  2. [10]

    Khorasaninejad, F

    M. Khorasaninejad, F. Aieta, P. Kanhaiya, M. A. Kats, P. Genevet, D. Rousso, and F. Capasso, Achromatic metasurface lens at telecommunication wavelengths, Nano letters15, 5358 (2015)

  3. [11]

    Mohammad, M

    N. Mohammad, M. Meem, B. Shen, P. Wang, and R. Menon, Broadband imaging with one planar diffractive lens, Scientific reports 8, 2799 (2018)

  4. [12]

    S. Wang, P. C. Wu, V.-C. Su, Y.-C. Lai, M.-K. Chen, H. Y. Kuo, B. H. Chen, Y. H. Chen, T.-T. Huang, J.-H. Wang, et al., A broadband achromatic metalens in the visible, Nature nanotechnology13, 227 (2018). 12

  5. [13]

    A. A. Fathnan and D. A. Powell, Bandwidth and size limits of achromatic printed-circuit metasurfaces, Optics express26, 29440 (2018)

  6. [14]

    Shrestha, A

    S. Shrestha, A. C. Overvig, M. Lu, A. Stein, and N. Yu, Broadband achromatic dielectric metalenses, Light: Science & Applications 7, 85 (2018)

  7. [15]

    Fan, H.-Y

    Z.-B. Fan, H.-Y. Qiu, H.-L. Zhang, X.-N. Pang, L.-D. Zhou, L. Liu, H. Ren, Q.-H. Wang, and J.-W. Dong, A broadband achromatic metalens array for integral imaging in the visible, Light: Science & Applications8, 67 (2019)

  8. [16]

    W. T. Chen, A. Y. Zhu, and F. Capasso, Flat optics with dispersion-engineered metasurfaces, Nature Reviews Materials 5, 604 (2020)

  9. [17]

    Balli, M

    F. Balli, M. Sultan, S. K. Lami, and J. T. Hastings, A hybrid achromatic metalens, Nature communications11, 3892 (2020)

  10. [18]

    Chung and O

    H. Chung and O. D. Miller, High-na achromatic metalenses by inverse design, Optics Express28, 6945 (2020)

  11. [19]

    Z. Li, P. Lin, Y.-W. Huang, J.-S. Park, W. T. Chen, Z. Shi, C.-W. Qiu, J.-X. Cheng, and F. Capasso, Meta-optics achieves rgb-achromatic focusing for virtual reality, Science Advances7, eabe4458 (2021)

  12. [20]

    Z. Li, R. Pestourie, J.-S. Park, Y.-W. Huang, S. G. Johnson, and F. Capasso, Inverse design enables large-scale high- performance meta-optics reshaping virtual reality, Nature communications13, 2409 (2022)

  13. [21]

    Y. Liu, J. Zhang, X. Le Roux, E. Cassan, D. Marris-Morini, L. Vivien, C. Alonso-Ramos, and D. Melati, Broadband behavior of quadratic metalenses with a wide field of view, Optics Express30, 39860 (2022)

  14. [22]

    P. Sun, M. Zhang, F. Dong, L. Feng, and W. Chu, Broadband achromatic polarization insensitive metalens over 950 nm bandwidth in the visible and near-infrared, Chinese Optics Letters20, 013601 (2022)

  15. [23]

    Y. Fan, J. Yao, and D. P. Tsai, Advance of large-area achromatic flat lenses, Light: Science & Applications12, 51 (2023)

  16. [24]

    Y. Chu, X. Xiao, X. Ye, C. Chen, S. Zhu, and T. Li, Design of achromatic hybrid metalens with secondary spectrum correction, Optics Express31, 21399 (2023)

  17. [25]

    Y. Hu, Y. Jiang, Y. Zhang, X. Yang, X. Ou, L. Li, X. Kong, X. Liu, C.-W. Qiu, and H. Duan, Asymptotic dispersion engineering for ultra-broadband meta-optics, nature communications14, 6649 (2023)

  18. [26]

    C.-F. Pan, H. Wang, H. Wang, P. N. S, Q. Ruan, S. Wredh, Y. Ke, J. Y. E. Chan, W. Zhang, C.-W. Qiu,et al., 3d-printed multilayer structures for high–numerical aperture achromatic metalenses, Science advances9, eadj9262 (2023)

  19. [27]

    M. Pan, Y. Fu, M. Zheng, H. Chen, Y. Zang, H. Duan, Q. Li, M. Qiu, and Y. Hu, Dielectric metalens for miniaturized imaging systems: progress and challenges, Light: Science & Applications11, 195 (2022)

  20. [28]

    Liang, A

    H. Liang, A. Martins, B.-H. V. Borges, J. Zhou, E. R. Martins, J. Li, and T. F. Krauss, High performance metalenses: numerical aperture, aberrations, chromaticity, and trade-offs, Optica6, 1461 (2019)

  21. [29]

    Lassalle, T

    E. Lassalle, T. W. W. Mass, D. Eschimese, A. V. Baranikov, E. Khaidarov, S. Li, R. Paniagua-Dominguez, and A. I. Kuznetsov, Imaging properties of large field-of-view quadratic metalenses and their applications to fingerprint detection, ACS Photonics 8, 1457 (2021)

  22. [30]

    Arbabi, E

    A. Arbabi, E. Arbabi, Y. Horie, S. M. Kamali, and A. Faraon, Planar metasurface retroreflector, Nature Photonics11, 415 (2017)

  23. [31]

    Groever, W

    B. Groever, W. T. Chen, and F. Capasso, Meta-lens doublet in the visible region, Nano letters17, 4902 (2017)

  24. [32]

    M. Pu, X. Li, Y. Guo, X. Ma, and X. Luo, Nanoapertures with ordered rotations: symmetry transformation and wide-angle flat lensing, Optics Express25, 31471 (2017)

  25. [33]

    Martins, K

    A. Martins, K. Li, J. Li, H. Liang, D. Conteduca, B.-H. V. Borges, T. F. Krauss, and E. R. Martins, On metalenses with arbitrarily wide field of view, Acs Photonics7, 2073 (2020)

  26. [34]

    Engelberg, C

    J. Engelberg, C. Zhou, N. Mazurski, J. Bar-David, A. Kristensen, and U. Levy, Near-ir wide-field-of-view huygens metalens for outdoor imaging applications, Nanophotonics9, 361 (2020)

  27. [35]

    J. Chen, X. Ye, S. Gao, Y. Chen, Y. Zhao, C. Huang, K. Qiu, S. Zhu, and T. Li, Planar wide-angle-imaging camera enabled by metalens array, Optica9, 431 (2022)

  28. [36]

    Fan, C.-P

    C.-Y. Fan, C.-P. Lin, and G.-D. J. Su, Ultrawide-angle and high-efficiency metalens in hexagonal arrangement, Scientific Reports 10, 15677 (2020)

  29. [37]

    Z. Li, C. Wang, Y. Wang, X. Lu, Y. Guo, X. Li, X. Ma, M. Pu, and X. Luo, Super-oscillatory metasurface doublet for sub-diffraction focusing with a large incident angle, Optics Express29, 9991 (2021)

  30. [38]

    F. Yang, M. Y. Shalaginov, H.-I. Lin, S. An, A. Agarwal, H. Zhang, C. Rivero-Baleine, T. Gu, and J. Hu, Wide field-of-view metalens: a tutorial, Advanced Photonics5, 033001 (2023)

  31. [39]

    N. Xie, M. D. Carson, J. E. Fröch, A. Majumdar, E. J. Seibel, and K. F. Böhringer, Large field-of-view short-wave infrared metalens for scanning fiber endoscopy, Journal of Biomedical Optics28, 094802 (2023)

  32. [40]

    Y. Dong, B. Zheng, F. Yang, H. Tang, H. Zhao, Y. Huang, T. Gu, J. Hu, and H. Zhang, Full-color, wide field-of-view metalens imaging via deep learning, Advanced Optical Materials13, 2402207 (2025)

  33. [41]

    M. Y. Shalaginov, S. An, F. Yang, P. Su, D. Lyzwa, A. M. Agarwal, H. Zhang, J. Hu, and T. Gu, Single-element diffraction- limited fisheye metalens, Nano Letters20, 7429 (2020)

  34. [42]

    Arbabi, E

    A. Arbabi, E. Arbabi, S. M. Kamali, Y. Horie, S. Han, and A. Faraon, Miniature optical planar camera based on a wide-angle metasurface doublet corrected for monochromatic aberrations, Nature communications7, 13682 (2016)

  35. [43]

    F. Xu, W. Chen, M. Li, P. Liu, and Y. Chen, Broadband achromatic and wide field-of-view single-layer metalenses in the mid-infrared, Optics Express31, 36439 (2023)

  36. [44]

    Hongli, C

    Y. Hongli, C. Zhaofeng, and L. Xiaotong, Broadband achromatic and wide field of view metalens-doublet by inverse design, Optics Express 32, 15315 (2024)

  37. [45]

    F. Yang, S. An, M. Y. Shalaginov, H. Zhang, C. Rivero-Baleine, J. Hu, and T. Gu, Design of broadband and wide-field- of-view metalenses, Opt. Lett.46, 5735 (2021). 13

  38. [46]

    J. P. Hugonin and P. Lalanne, Reticolo software for grating analysis, arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.00901 (2021)

  39. [47]

    A. Ueno, J. Hu, and S. An, Ai for optical metasurface, npj Nanophotonics1, 36 (2024)

  40. [48]

    Presutti and F

    F. Presutti and F. Monticone, Focusing on bandwidth: achromatic metalens limits, Optica7, 624 (2020)

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.