Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 22 references

Miniaturized and robust tunable monochromatic magneto-optical platform for pulsed magnetic fields

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A laser-driven white lamp feeding a mini monochromator can replace the bulky, costly Ti:sapphire/OPO laser system in pulsed-field magneto-optics, reproducing known phase transitions to within 1 T.

desk verdict Useful compact alternative to laser-based tunable magneto-optics, but the headline 'within 1 T' validation claim is contradicted by the paper's own Table I for HC1. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.16445 v1 pith:XCFLVTXD submitted 2025-07-22 cond-mat.str-el

Lev Bergsma , Zhuo Yang , Bei Sun , Yasuhiro H. Matsuda , Koichi Kindo , Hiroshi Kageyama , Hiroaki Ueda , Henrik M. Ronnow
show 1 more author
Atsuhiko Miyata
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords tunablemonochromaticmagneto-transmissionFaradayrotationpulsedmagneticfieldslaser-drivenwhitelightsourceminimonochromatorCdCr2O4SrCu2(BO3)2magneto-opticalsetup
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Tunable monochromatic magneto-transmission — shining fixed-wavelength light through a sample while a pulsed magnet sweeps the field — is a standard way to locate field-induced transitions in quantum materials, but it normally depends on an expensive, unstable Ti:sapphire laser coupled to an optical parametric oscillator. This paper claims that a laser-driven white lamp plus a mini monochromator, a unit under 30 cm long delivering about 2.5 nm bandwidth at roughly 30 micro-watts, performs the same job when paired with a 100 kHz photodetector in a 36 ms field pulse. To prove the point, the authors measured Faraday rotation in the frustrated magnet CdCr2O4, recovering the known sharp transition and magnetization plateau near 28 T, and band-edge transmission in the Shastry-Sutherland (orthogonal-dimer) antiferromagnet SrCu2(BO3)2, recovering a sequence of magnetization-plateau transitions with critical fields within 1 T of published magnetization data. The significance is that high-resolution, wavelength-tunable magneto-optics would no longer require a specialized laser laboratory.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing pieces are three. First, the source: a laser-driven broadband white lamp (400-900 nm) coupled through a 400-micrometre fibre into a mini monochromator with a 1200 lines/mm grating, whose output-slit width sets a ~2.5 nm FWHM at ~30 micro-watts across a unit shorter than 30 cm — the replacement for the tunable laser. Second, the detector chain: a 100 kHz avalanche photodetector sampling the transmitted light once per 10 microseconds, giving about 100 field points per millisecond against 0.8 points per millisecond for the comparison CCD spectrometer. Third, the differential Faraday-rotation method: because the measured Faraday angle $\theta$ changes sign when the field $\mathbf{B}$ or the propagation vector $\mathbf{k}$ is reversed, two acquisitions under reversed conditions are subtracted to cancel common-mode optical and mechanical artifacts, leaving the pure rotation even though the compact probe cannot host the usual beam-splitter and two-polarizer arrangement. Faraday rotation here is the rotation of a light beam's linear polarization while the beam travels through the sample along the magnetic field.

What would settle it

Run the same CdCr2O4 measurement at 635 nm while reversing the light-propagation direction (swapping the roles of the two optical fibres) instead of the magnetic field: the extracted Faraday rotation near 28 T must match the field-reversed result within the quoted error, or the differential method is contaminated by field-dependent artifacts. Separately, measure a sample with a spectral feature narrower than the instrument's ~2.5 nm bandpass and step the monochromator slit width from ~1 nm to ~5 nm: if the inferred critical fields shift by more than 1 T, the claimed accuracy is limited by spectral convolution rather than by the physics.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a combination of a laser-driven white-light source and a mini monochromator is a high-accuracy, cost-effective, compact substitute for Ti:sapphire/OPO systems in tunable monochromatic magneto-transmission under non-destructive pulsed fields. The paper argues that low probe power is sufficient because millisecond-scale pulses give the detector ample time, and that the source's stability and small footprint remove the main barriers to wider use of the technique. To extract Faraday rotation in a probe too small for a conventional beam-splitter polarimeter, the authors introduce a differential scheme: reversing the magnetic field (or the light-propagation direction) changes only the sign of the Faraday angle, so subtracting two such measurements isolates the pure rotation. Validated on CdCr2O4 and SrCu2(BO3)2, the setup reproduces literature magnetization curves and critical fields to within 1 T, and its 100 kHz sampling resolves plateau features that whole-spectrum (spectrally resolved) acquisition misses.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that reversing the magnetic field (or the light-propagation direction) changes only the sign of the Faraday rotation, so that subtracting two reversed measurements cancels every other optical, mechanical, and electronic artifact; any field-dependent asymmetry in the probe optics, polarizers, or sample position would contaminate the extracted signal. The procedural details of this subtraction and of the linear-background removal are deferred to the Supplementary Information, whose cross-references appear in the manuscript as unresolved placeholders ('Fig.??', 'Sec.,??') in Section III.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Within the 1 T accuracy demonstrated on CdCr2O4 and SrCu2(BO3)2, field-induced transitions and magnetization-plateau sequences can be mapped out at arbitrary probe wavelengths from a single 36 ms pulse.
  • The ~100 points/ms sampling resolves plateau features (e.g., SCBO between 39 and 42 T) that spectrally resolved acquisition at 0.8 points/ms misses.
  • The low probe power (~30 micro-watts) reduces sample heating relative to broadband illumination, improving fidelity at cryogenic temperatures.
  • The source's compactness and stability remove the cost, alignment-drift, and temperature-sensitivity barriers that have confined tunable monochromatic magneto-transmission to specialized laser laboratories.
  • The demonstrated scope is millisecond-range non-destructive pulses: the paper notes that destructive magnets with sub-10 microsecond pulses still need the high power of laser systems.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The subtract-two-reversed-runs recipe generalizes: any polarization measurement where the field or beam direction can be inverted — reflection Kerr, magnetic circular dichroism, microscopy — could cancel common-mode artifacts without a balanced-detector layout.
  • The 2.5 nm bandpass sets an explicit spectral-resolution floor; for materials with sub-2.5 nm spectral features the traces will be slit-convolved, so sweeping the output-slit width from ~1 nm to ~5 nm on a sharp-line sample directly tests where inferred critical fields begin to shift.
  • Pairing this optics unit with the compact 40 T pulsed magnet cited in the paper — a combination not demonstrated here — would put a tunable-wavelength high-field magneto-optical station on a benchtop.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports a compact, low-cost tunable monochromatic magneto-transmission system for pulsed magnetic fields, based on a laser-driven white-light source coupled to a mini monochromator, with 100 kHz photodetection and a total source length under 30 cm. To validate the setup, the authors perform Faraday rotation measurements on CdCr2O4 at 4.2 K and monochromatic magneto-transmission on SrCu2(BO3)2 at 1.5 K, comparing the extracted critical fields with published magnetization and magnetostriction data. The central claim is that the setup reproduces the known phase transitions of both materials 'with an error bar of 1 T', while offering higher data density and lower sample heating than spectrally-resolved methods.

Significance. If the validation claim holds, this is a useful technical advance: it makes tunable monochromatic magneto-optical experiments in non-destructive pulsed magnets substantially more accessible by replacing bulky Ti:sapphire/OPO lasers with a compact white-light-plus-monochromator unit, while retaining high temporal resolution. The choice of two well-characterized frustrated magnets as test cases is appropriate, and the demonstrated 100 kHz acquisition rate is a genuine practical advantage. However, the quantitative support for the headline 'within 1 T' agreement is currently undermined by the authors' own Table I, and several load-bearing procedural details are relegated to a missing Supplementary file. The significance of the paper therefore depends on whether these issues can be resolved; as submitted, the central accuracy claim is not sustained by the data shown.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III.B, Table I] The statement that the magneto-transmission critical fields agree with the magnetization results 'with an error bar of 1 T' is directly contradicted by Table I. The table lists HC1 = 24 T (Pulse 1) and 23 T (Pulse 2) from dI/dB, versus 27 T from the magnetization data of Onizuka et al. (Ref. 18), a difference of 3–4 T. HC2 agrees (34 T) and HC3 differs by 1 T (40 vs 39 T), but the discrepancy in HC1 is far outside the claimed ±1 T. The text gives no explanation for this offset. Because the derivative curves from which HC1 was extracted are placed in the missing Supplementary Fig. ??, the reader cannot check whether the derivative peak was misidentified, whether it corresponds to a different physical threshold such as an optical onset of band-edge shift, or whether the field calibration differed. This needs to be corrected or explicitly qualified before the validation claim can be accepted.
  2. [Supplementary Information references throughout (Sec. II, III.A, III.B)] The manuscript repeatedly cites 'Supplementary Information Sec. ??', 'Fig. ??', and 'Table ??' without providing the actual supplementary material. These references cover the detailed description of the differential Faraday rotation method, the linear background subtraction for CdCr2O4, the derivative curves used to extract the SCBO critical fields, and the spectrally-resolved comparison data. All of these items are load-bearing for the paper's accuracy claims, and their absence makes the manuscript incomplete. The authors should supply the supplementary file and replace the placeholders with correct citations.
  3. [Section III.A, differential Faraday rotation method] The differential method assumes that reversing the magnetic field direction and/or the light propagation vector changes only the sign of the Faraday rotation while leaving all other optical and mechanical factors unchanged, so that subtracting the two measurements isolates the Faraday signal. This assumption is not verified in the text. No raw intensity traces, zero-field checks, or control experiments with reversed k are shown to demonstrate that polarizer alignment, sample position, strain, or field-dependent artifacts indeed cancel. If any of these factors differ between the two scans, the extracted Faraday rotation would be contaminated. Please provide evidence for the cancellation, or state the limitation explicitly.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section III.B and Conclusion] The manuscript uses both 'spectro-resolved' and 'spectrally-resolved' to describe the comparison method; please use one term consistently throughout.
  2. [Section II] The output power is given as '∼30 µw' but the standard unit symbol is µW; please correct the capitalization.
  3. [Conclusion] The phrase 'derivativedI (B)/dB' appears with a missing space and the notation dI(B)/dB is not defined at first use; please clarify in Section III.B where the derivative is introduced.
  4. [Figure 4(a)] The caption does not specify which plotted curves correspond to the magnetization data (Ref. 18) and the transverse magnetostriction data (Ref. 19), nor whether the transmission signal is shown on a linear scale; please clarify.
  5. [Abstract and Section II] The abstract refers to a 'millisecond-range pulsed magnetic field condition' while Section II states the pulse duration is 36 ms; please make the description consistent.
  6. [Table I] The statement that the error bar is 'estimated to be ±1 T' is given without any derivation; if this is a field-calibration uncertainty, please explain how it was obtained, especially in view of the 3–4 T discrepancy in HC1.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the validation compares directly measured transmission/Faraday features against independent prior experimental benchmarks; the Table I discrepancy is a correctness issue, not circularity.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is an instrumental demonstration, not a parameter fit. A white-light lamp and mini monochromator produce tunable monochromatic light; the transmitted intensity or Faraday rotation is measured on CdCr2O4 and SrCu2(BO3)2; field-sweep traces are plotted and differentiated; and the resulting transition fields are compared with published magnetization/magnetostriction data (Refs. 15, 18, 19). No parameter appearing in the final comparison is fitted to the benchmark values: the HC1-HC3 values in Table I are read directly from dI(B)/dB peak positions, and the CdCr2O4 curve is obtained by subtracting a linear diamagnetic background. The differential Faraday method reverses B or k and subtracts two traces, which is a measurement protocol rather than an equation whose output is defined by the desired result. Refs. 15 and 18 include some present co-authors, but they are previously published, parameter-free experimental results with stated conditions (e.g., B parallel to [111] at 4.2 K; magnetization of SCBO), and they do not incorporate the present data, so they are legitimate external benchmarks under the review rules. The claim of 'excellent agreement with an error bar of 1 T' is quantitatively at odds with Table I for HC1 (23-24 T versus 27 T from magnetization), but that is an evidentiary/accuracy contradiction, not a circular reduction of a prediction to its input. Therefore no circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities or forces are introduced. The free parameters are limited to a linear background subtraction in the Faraday rotation analysis. The axioms are standard magneto-optics and material-specific assumptions from prior literature, not ad hoc to this paper.

free parameters (1)
  • linear background subtraction coefficients for Faraday rotation = not reported
    A linear background from diamagnetic contributions is subtracted from the Faraday rotation angle to extract the magnetization signal (Section III.A, details in missing supplementary). The coefficients are fitted to low-field data and not reported.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Faraday rotation angle is proportional to the sample magnetization.
    Standard magneto-optical relation used to convert measured rotation to magnetization (Section III.A).
  • domain assumption Reversing magnetic field direction or light propagation changes only the sign of the Faraday rotation, leaving all other optical factors unchanged.
    Underlies the differential measurement method described in Section III.A.
  • domain assumption The band-edge shift of SrCu2(BO3)2 is sensitive to spin correlations and field-induced phase transitions.
    Based on prior work by Cherian et al. (Ref. 20), used to interpret transmission changes as phase transitions (Section III.B).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Miniaturized and robust tunable monochromatic magneto-optical platform for pulsed magnetic fields." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XCFLVTXD

@misc{pith2026250716445,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Miniaturized and robust tunable monochromatic magneto-optical platform for pulsed magnetic fields},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XCFLVTXD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.16445}
}
read the original abstract

Tunable monochromatic magneto-transmission is one of the most established magneto-optical techniques, particularly well suited for pulsed magnetic fields. It employs fixed-wavelength monochromatic light as the probe, while the magnetic field is swept to bring the sample into resonance with the photon energy. The key component of this setup is a tunable laser system, typically consisting of a Ti:sapphire laser coupled with an optical parametric oscillator. However, such laser systems are often bulky, expensive, and inherently unstable, which significantly limits their widespread application in magneto-optical laboratories. In this work, we develop a high-accuracy, cost-effective, and compact tunable monochromatic magneto-transmission system based on a combination of a laser-driven white light source and a mini monochromator, and demonstrate its feasibility and performance in a millisecond-range pulsed magnetic field condition. To verify the accuracy of this new and simplified setup, we performed Faraday rotation measurements on the geometrically frustrated spin system CdCr2O4, as well as magneto-transmission experiments on the Shastry-Sutherland lattice antiferromagnet SrCu2(BO3)2. These results show excellent agreement with previous reports, confirming the reliability and precision of the new setup.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.16445 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic view of the tunable monochromatic magneto-transmission measurement setup. A broadband laser-driven white light [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Selected single-wavelength obtained after the light source [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) Normalized magnetization curve obtained at 4.2 K compared with literature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Normalised transmission signal as a function of field compared with the reported magnetization and magnetostriction data [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

22 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Nicholas , author P

    author author R. Nicholas , author P. Solane ,\ and\ author O. Portugall ,\ title title Ultrahigh magnetic field study of layer split bands in graphite , \ @noop journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 111 ,\ pages 096802 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    work page 2013

  2. [2]

    Yang , author A

    author author Z. Yang , author A. Surrente , author K. Galkowski , author A. Miyata , author O. Portugall , author R. J. \ Sutton , author A. A. \ Haghighirad , author H. J. \ Snaith , author D. K. \ Maude , author P. Plochocka ,\ and\ author R. J. \ Nicholas ,\ title title Impact of the Halide Cage on the Electronic Properties of Fully Inorganic Cesium L...

    work page doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00416

  3. [3]

    Miyata , author A

    author author A. Miyata , author A. Mitioglu , author P. Plochocka , author O. Portugall , author J. T.-W. \ Wang , author S. D. \ Stranks , author H. J. \ Snaith ,\ and\ author R. J. \ Nicholas ,\ title title Direct measurement of the exciton binding energy and effective masses for charge carriers in organic--inorganic tri-halide perovskites , \ @noop jo...

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    Yang , author A

    author author Z. Yang , author A. Surrente , author K. Galkowski , author N. Bruyant , author D. K. \ Maude , author A. A. \ Haghighirad , author H. J. \ Snaith , author P. Plochocka ,\ and\ author R. J. \ Nicholas ,\ title title Unraveling the exciton binding energy and the dielectric constant in single-crystal methylammonium lead triiodide perovskite , ...

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    Crassee , author J

    author author I. Crassee , author J. Levallois , author A. L. \ Walter , author M. Ostler , author A. Bostwick , author E. Rotenberg , author T. Seyller , author D. van der Marel ,\ and\ author A. B. \ Kuzmenko ,\ title title Giant faraday rotation in single- and multilayer graphene , \ https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1816 journal journal Nature Physics \ vo...

    doi:10.1038/nphys1816

  6. [6]

    Higo , author H

    author author T. Higo , author H. Man , author D. B. \ Gopman , author L. Wu , author T. Koretsune , author O. M. J. \ van ’t Erve , author Y. P. \ Kabanov , author D. Rees , author Y. Li , author M.-T. \ Suzuki , author S. Patankar , author M. Ikhlas , author C. L. \ Chien , author R. Arita , author R. D. \ Shull , author J. Orenstein ,\ and\ author S. N...

  7. [7]

    Fedchenko , author J

    author author O. Fedchenko , author J. Minar , author A. Akashdeep , author S. W. \ D'Souza , author D. Vasilyev , author O. Tkach , author L. Odenbreit , author Q. L. \ Nguyen , author D. Kutnyakhov , author N. Wind , author L. Wenthaus , author M. Scholz , author K. Rossnagel , author M. Hoesch , author M. Aeschlimann , author B. Stadtmueller , author M...

    arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    Song , author C

    author author Q. Song , author C. A. \ Occhialini , author E. Ergeçen , author B. Ilyas , author D. Amoroso , author P. Barone , author J. Kapeghian , author K. Watanabe , author T. Taniguchi , author A. S. \ Botana , author S. Picozzi , author N. Gedik ,\ and\ author R. Comin ,\ title title Evidence for a single-layer van der waals multiferroic , \ https...

    doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04337-x

Show all 22 references
  1. [9]

    Jiang , author Y

    author author Y. Jiang , author Y. Wu , author J. Zhang , author J. Wei , author B. Peng ,\ and\ author C.-W. \ Qiu ,\ title title Dilemma in optical identification of single-layer multiferroics , \ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06107-3 journal journal Nature \ volume 619...

    doi

  2. [10]

    Huang , author G

    author author B. Huang , author G. Clark , author E. Navarro-Moratalla , author D. R. \ Klein , author R. Cheng , author K. L. \ Seyler , author D. Zhong , author E. Schmidgall , author M. A. \ McGuire , author D. H. \ Cobden , author W. Yao , author D. Xiao , author P. Jarill...

    doi

  3. [11]

    Tabataba-Vakili , author H

    author author F. Tabataba-Vakili , author H. P. G. \ Nguyen , author A. Rupp , author K. Mosina , author A. Papavasileiou , author K. Watanabe , author T. Taniguchi , author P. Maletinsky , author M. M. \ Glazov , author Z. Sofer , author A. S. \ Baimuratov ,\ and\ author A. H...

    2024

  4. [12]

    \ Zhou , author Z

    author author X.-G. \ Zhou , author Z. Yang , author Y. Lee , author J. Park , author Y. Kohama , author K. Kindo , author Y. H. \ Matsuda , author J.-G. \ Park , author O. Janson ,\ and\ author A. Miyata ,\ title title Giant Linear Dichroism Controlled by Magnetic Field in Fe...

    2024 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Yao , author X

    author author J. Yao , author X. Ding , author J. Qiao , author C. Yang , author I. Hsu ,\ and\ author C. Hsu ,\ title title Pump-tuning optical parametric oscillation and sum-frequency mixing with KTP pumped by a Ti:sapphire laser , \ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S...

    doi

  6. [14]

    Galkowski , author A

    author author K. Galkowski , author A. Mitioglu , author A. Miyata , author P. Plochocka , author O. Portugall , author G. E. \ Eperon , author J. T.-W. \ Wang , author T. Stergiopoulos , author S. D. \ Stranks , author H. J. \ Snaith ,\ and\ author R. J. \ Nicholas ,\ title t...

    doi

  7. [15]

    Kojima , author A

    author author E. Kojima , author A. Miyata , author S. Miyabe , author S. Takeyama , author H. Ueda ,\ and\ author Y. Ueda ,\ title title Full-magnetization of geometrically frustrated CdCr _ 2 O _ 4 determined by Faraday rotation measurements at magnetic fields up to 140 T , ...

    doi

  8. [16]

    author author Matsuda, Y. H. and Abe, N. and Takeyama, S. and Kageyama, H. and Corboz, P. and Honecker, A. and Manmana, S. R. and Foltin, G. R. and Schmidt, K. P. and Mila, F. ,\ title title Magnetization of SrCu _ 2 ( BO _ 3 ) _ 2 in Ultrahigh Magnetic Fields up to 118 T , \ ...

    2013

  9. [17]

    Miura ,\ @noop title Physics of Semiconductors in High Magnetic Fields \ ( publisher Oxford University Press ,\ year 2007 ) NoStop

    author author N. Miura ,\ @noop title Physics of Semiconductors in High Magnetic Fields \ ( publisher Oxford University Press ,\ year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007

  10. [18]

    Onizuka , author H

    author author K. Onizuka , author H. Kageyama , author Y. Narumi , author K. Kindo , author Y. Ueda ,\ and\ author T. Goto ,\ title title 1/3 magnetization plateau in SrCu _2 (BO _3 ) _2 -stripe order of excited triplets , \ @noop journal journal Journal of the Physical Societ...

    2000

  11. [19]

    Radtke , author A

    author author G. Radtke , author A. Sa \'u l , author H. A. \ Dabkowska , author M. B. \ Salamon ,\ and\ author M. Jaime ,\ title title Magnetic nanopantograph in the SrCu _2 (BO _3 ) _2 Shastry--Sutherland lattice , \ @noop journal journal Proceedings of the National Academy ...

    1971

  12. [20]

    author author J. G. \ Cherian , author T. D. \ Tokumoto , author H. Zhou ,\ and\ author S. A. \ McGill ,\ title title Short-range magnetic interactions and optical band-edge physics in SrCu _ 2 ( BO _ 3 ) _ 2 , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.014405 journal journal Physi...

    doi

  13. [21]

    Kodama , author M

    author author K. Kodama , author M. Takigawa , author M. Horvatic , author C. Berthier , author H. Kageyama , author Y. Ueda , author S. Miyahara , author F. Becca ,\ and\ author F. Mila ,\ title title Magnetic superstructure in the two-dimensional quantum antiferromagnet srcu...

    2002

  14. [22]

    Ikeda , author K

    author author A. Ikeda , author K. Noda , author K. Shimbori , author K. Seki , author D. Bhoi , author A. Ishita , author J. Nakamura , author K. Matsubayashi ,\ and\ author K. Akiba ,\ title title A concise 40 T pulse magnet for condensed matter experiments , \ @noop journal...

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.