Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 29 references

N=1 Supersymmetric QCD on the lattice using overlap fermions

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper constructs a lattice action for N=1 supersymmetric QCD with overlap fermions that preserves an exact modified chiral symmetry at finite lattice spacing, using auxiliary fermion fields to make the Yukawa terms chirally invariant.

desk verdict First overlap-based SQCD action with exact lattice chiral symmetry, competently derived; the counterterm-reduction claim runs ahead of the evidence, but the paper deserves a referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.16651 v1 pith:DIICDMBK submitted 2025-07-22 hep-lat

Marios Costa , Eleni Ioannou , Haralambos Panagopoulos This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-lat MSC 81T2581T60 PACS 11.30.Pb12.38.Gc11.15.Ha
keywords latticesupersymmetryN=1SQCDoverlapfermionsGinsparg-WilsonrelationchiralsymmetryMajoranagluinoauxiliaryfermionfieldsultralocalinteractions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Wilson-type lattice discretizations of supersymmetric QCD (SQCD) break chiral symmetry and require many fine-tuned counterterms to recover the continuum theory. The paper offers an overlap-fermion alternative, a discretization whose Ginsparg-Wilson relation, $\gamma_5 D + D\gamma_5 = aD\gamma_5 D$, is the lattice remnant of chiral symmetry, with quarks in the fundamental representation and Majorana gluinos in the adjoint representation, both protected from additive mass renormalization. The obstruction is the Yukawa interaction, which is not chirally invariant in the naive action; the paper shows that adding non-dynamical auxiliary fermion fields, with chiral transformations arranged so that their sums with the physical fermions rotate in the standard continuum way, restores an exact lattice-modified chiral symmetry. Integrating the auxiliary fields out exactly leaves only ultralocal interaction terms and a Pfaffian, producing a total lattice action ready for perturbative and nonperturbative study. If correct, this establishes an overlap-based SQCD action that evades the mass fine-tuning and unwanted counterterms of Wilson-type formulations, providing a foundation for numerical simulations of supersymmetric gauge theories.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the Ginsparg-Wilson relation $\gamma_5 D + D\gamma_5 = a D\gamma_5 D$ combined with the overlap operator. In the fundamental representation the paper uses $D_{\rm ov}=\frac{1}{a}(1+\gamma_5 H/\sqrt{H^\dagger H})$, $H=\gamma_5 D_W$; in the adjoint representation it takes $D^{\rm adj}_{\rm ov}=\frac{\mu}{2}(1+V_{\rm maj})$ with $V_{\rm maj}=D_W^{\rm adj}(D_W^{{\rm adj}\dagger}D_W^{\rm adj})^{-1/2}$, whose unitarity-like relations are what make the adjoint overlap operator satisfy the generalized Ginsparg-Wilson condition for the Majorana gluino. The second element is a pair of auxiliary fermion fields $\chi_\psi$ and $\chi_\lambda$, with modified chiral transformations chosen so that $\psi+\chi_\psi$ and $\lambda+\chi_\lambda$ rotate as ordinary chiral fields; this is the auxiliary-field prescription from chiral gauge theories applied to the SQCD Yukawa term. The third element is exact functional integration over those auxiliary fields: the matrix $\Xi=-\mu\delta+\frac{a g^2}{2}Q$ is strictly diagonal in coordinate space, so the integration contributes only ultralocal terms $S_{\lambda\lambda}$, $S_{\rm Pf}=-\operatorname{tr}\log\Xi_+-\operatorname{tr}\log\Xi_-$, and $S_{\Psi\Psi}$ involving $(\Xi)^{-1}$, with the Pfaffian $\operatorname{Pf}(2C^T\Xi)$ equal to $\det(\Xi_+)\det(\Xi_-)$ up to a constant.

What would settle it

Compute the one-loop renormalization of quark, squark, and gluino masses and of the Yukawa and quartic couplings directly from $S^{\rm total}_{\rm SQCD}$. If a power-divergent critical mass, a nonzero $A_+$-$A_-^\dagger$ mixing counterterm, or an $O(a^0)$ second-Yukawa or quartic counterterm is forced by quantum corrections, the claimed chiral protection and counterterm reduction fail; a nonperturbative Monte Carlo measurement of the effective action at large squark background would test whether the poles of $(\Xi_-)^{-1}$ are exactly cancelled by zeros of the determinant.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that N=1 SQCD admits a lattice action built from overlap fermions for which the full action $S^{\rm total}_{\rm SQCD}=S^L_{\rm SQCD}+S_{\lambda\lambda}+S_{\rm Pf}+S_{\Psi\Psi}$ is invariant under a modified chiral symmetry consistent with the Ginsparg-Wilson relation and has the correct continuum limit. The naive Yukawa term is not invariant, so the paper introduces auxiliary fermion fields $\chi_\psi$ (Dirac, fundamental) and $\chi^\alpha_\lambda$ (Majorana, adjoint) and redefines the chiral transformations so that $\psi+\chi_\psi$ and $\lambda+\chi_\lambda$ transform exactly as continuum chiral fields. The auxiliary fields are then integrated out functionally; because their quadratic part is diagonal in coordinate space, the result is a set of ultralocal vertices rather than new nonlocal operators: the quark-gluino-squark term $S_{\lambda\lambda}$, the Pfaffian term $S_{\rm Pf}$, and the term $S_{\Psi\Psi}$, which contains Majorana-type quark artifacts $\psi\psi$ and $\bar\psi\bar\psi$. For $N_f=1$ the paper shows the eigenvectors of the matrices $\Xi_\pm$ form a complete orthogonal set and that the poles of $(\Xi_-)^{-1}$ are exactly compensated by zeros of $\det(\Xi_-)$, so the integrated effective action is finite. The authors defer full renormalization and continuum matching to future work, but argue the modified chiral symmetry suppresses the additive mass renormalization, squark mixing, and unwanted Yukawa and quartic counterterms that plague Wilson-type SQCD.

Load-bearing premise

The construction assumes without re-deriving it that the adjoint overlap operator taken from Ref. [22] satisfies the generalized Ginsparg-Wilson relations for Majorana gluinos, and that after the auxiliary fields are integrated out the lattice action has the correct continuum SQCD limit, which the paper itself defers to future renormalization work.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Quarks and gluinos in this formulation are protected from additive mass renormalization, so the fermionic sector needs no power-divergent critical-mass fine-tuning.
  • The modified chiral symmetry suppresses $A_+$-$A_-^\dagger$ squark mixing and the unwanted second Yukawa term that appear in Wilson-type SQCD, reducing the number of counterterms.
  • The action, including the new ultralocal vertices from auxiliary-field integration, is in a form ready for two-loop perturbative renormalization and for numerical simulation.
  • For $N_f=1$, the apparent poles in $(\Xi_-)^{-1}$ are exactly cancelled by zeros of $\det(\Xi_-)$, so the integrated effective action has no unsafe singularities.
  • Quark and squark mass terms are included consistently with lattice chiral symmetry, which lets one study how the masses affect supersymmetry restoration.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: the same auxiliary-field construction should transfer to any supersymmetric lattice theory whose fermion kinetic term already obeys a generalized Ginsparg-Wilson relation, since the Yukawa restoration only needs the representation content of the couplings.
  • Beyond the paper: since $\Xi$ is diagonal in coordinate space, the Pfaffian and inverse-matrix factors can be included in a Monte Carlo weight as purely local factors, so a practical test is to measure their effect on the path-integral phase at strong coupling.
  • Beyond the paper: if the chiral protection holds, the one-loop fermion mass renormalization in this action must be purely logarithmic or vanish, a sharper quantitative prediction than the paper's general counterterm-reduction statement.
  • Beyond the paper: the $N_f=1$ eigenvector decomposition could be used to build reduced models at fixed squark background, giving a nonperturbative check of the pole-zero cancellation outside perturbation theory.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a lattice action for N=1 supersymmetric QCD using overlap fermions in the fundamental and adjoint representations. It introduces auxiliary Majorana and Dirac fields so that the Yukawa interaction is invariant under a modified lattice chiral symmetry, then functionally integrates the auxiliary fields out exactly, obtaining ultralocal contributions and a Pfaffian. The manuscript includes a detailed matrix analysis for general N_f, an explicit diagonalization for N_f=1, and a perturbative expansion of the new terms up to O(g^5). The central advertised output is a chirally invariant overlap action for SQCD that is claimed to reduce the number of required counterterms compared with Wilson-type discretizations, with the actual renormalization analysis deferred to future work.

Significance. If the construction is correct, this would be the first overlap-based lattice action for N=1 SQCD with exact lattice chiral symmetry at finite spacing, and the explicit ultralocal terms are directly usable in future perturbative and nonperturbative studies. The paper's algebraic core—the Gaussian integration over auxiliary fields and the N_f=1 matrix diagonalization—is carried out in detail and appears internally consistent. The main advertised advantage, however, is not yet demonstrated: the counterterm reduction and the quantum continuum limit are explicitly postponed to a future renormalization analysis, and the adjoint-overlap chiral machinery is imported from Ref. [22] without an independent check. The paper is therefore a strong and useful construction proposal rather than a complete proof of all of its claims.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III.1, Eqs. (24)-(28)] The gluino sector and the chirally invariant Yukawa construction depend on the imported generalized Ginsparg-Wilson relations for the adjoint Majorana overlap operator. The manuscript only states that the relations in Eq. (27) "can be easily shown" and does not verify that Dadj_ov = mu/2(1+Vmaj), with Vmaj built from the adjoint Wilson operator in Eq. (26), satisfies them, nor does it demonstrate that the transformation in Eq. (28) leaves the kinetic term in Eq. (23) invariant. Since this premise is load-bearing for the central claim of exact lattice chiral symmetry, please provide a direct proof or a self-contained derivation in an appendix.
  2. [Abstract and Section IV (also the paragraph after Eq. (64))] The claim that the formulation "reduces the number of required counterterms" compared with Wilson-type discretizations is not established anywhere in the manuscript. Section IV explicitly defers the computation of all perturbative fine-tunings and counterterms to future work, and the new interactions in Eqs. (61)-(63) introduce vertices whose renormalization has not been analyzed; chiral symmetry alone does not guarantee that no additional or different counterterms appear. Please either remove or substantially qualify this claim in the abstract and conclusions, or support it with an explicit symmetry-based accounting of the required counterterms.
  3. [Section III.1, paragraph after Eq. (64)] The assertion that the formulation "ensures the correct continuum limit" is not demonstrated in the paper. At the classical level the new contributions S_lambda_lambda, S_Pf and S_Psi_Psi are O(a) and hence vanish in the naive continuum limit, but their quantum effects and possible operator mixings require the renormalization analysis that the paper defers. Please state explicitly that only the classical tree-level limit is established and that the quantum continuum limit remains an open question.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eqs. (15)-(18)] The sign convention in the mass identification is inconsistent: Eq. (16) contains Dov + m0/(1 - am0/2), while Eq. (17) writes Dov - m with -m = m0/(1 - am0/2); the sign in Eq. (17) or the definition of m should be corrected.
  2. [Eq. (24)] There is a typo, "reprensentation" for "representation", in the sentence introducing Dadj_ov; this should be corrected.
  3. [Section III.1, after Eq. (54)] The parenthetical note about gamma5 bases interrupts the main argument; consider moving it to a footnote or an appendix.
  4. [Fig. 1] The text refers to Fig. 1 for the Feynman vertices, but the actual figure is not included in the manuscript version provided for review; please ensure that the figure is present and legible in the final submission.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the overlap-SQCD action is constructed from imported external Ginsparg-Wilson machinery and explicit auxiliary-field Gaussian integration, with no parameter fitted to the claimed outputs.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The adjoint Majorana overlap operator and its generalized Ginsparg-Wilson identities (Eqs. 24-28) are imported from Ref. [22], whose authors do not overlap with the present authors; the paper does not redefine those identities in terms of the SQCD result it is trying to establish. The chirally invariant Yukawa term is built with the standard Lüscher auxiliary-field prescription, and the transformation laws in Eqs. (39)-(44) are stated and then verified by substitution; the auxiliary fields are integrated out using textbook Gaussian and Pfaffian formulas (Eqs. (50) and (55)), giving explicit ultralocal contributions (61)-(63). No parameter is fitted to any target quantity, and the 'reduced counterterms' claim is an inference from exact lattice chiral symmetry, with the actual renormalization computation explicitly postponed to future work in Section IV; that is a deferral, not a circular reduction. The only load-bearing external input is the generalized Ginsparg-Wilson result of Ref. [22]; because that is a separate published result by different authors and not a self-citation, it counts as independent support. The brief 'One can easily show' statement for Eq. (27) is an unverified-from-first-principles step in this paper, but that is a verification gap or correctness risk, not circularity. There are no circular steps.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 2 invented entities

No parameters are fitted to data; the bare mass, gauge coupling, lattice spacing, and the overlap mass parameter mu are standard inputs. Two auxiliary fields are introduced and then eliminated; they have no independent evidence because they are not physical. The main unverified input is the generalized Ginsparg-Wilson construction for gluinos from Ref. [22] and the assumption that the integrated action has the correct continuum limit.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Ginsparg-Wilson relation and Lüscher modified chiral transformations for overlap quarks.
    Used to define the chiral transformations in Eqs. (9) and (39)-(44); these are standard results imported from Refs. [2,20] and not re-derived here.
  • domain assumption Generalized Ginsparg-Wilson relation for Majorana gluinos with Vmaj satisfying Eq. (27) and the chiral transformation Eq. (28).
    Imported from Ref. [22] and used to define the adjoint overlap operator in Eqs. (24)-(28). The paper does not prove these relations and gives no independent verification in SQCD.
  • standard math Exact Gaussian Grassmann integration formulas for Dirac fermions (Eq. 50) and Majorana fermions (Eq. 55).
    Used to integrate out the auxiliary fields chi_psi and chi_lambda; these are standard fermionic path-integral identities.
  • ad hoc to paper The integrated ultralocal terms preserve the correct continuum limit and do not introduce unwanted symmetry-breaking counterterms beyond the known Wilson-type ones.
    Asserted in Section III.1 and in the conclusion, but explicitly deferred to future renormalization work in Section IV. This is the main unverified premise behind the central claim.
invented entities (2)
  • Auxiliary Majorana fermion chi^alpha_lambda in the adjoint representation
    purpose: Restore exact lattice chiral symmetry in the Yukawa term involving gluinos.
    Non-dynamical and integrated out; no physical predictions. Introduced following Lüscher's prescription in Ref. [20].
  • Auxiliary Dirac fermion chi_psi in the fundamental representation
    purpose: Restore exact lattice chiral symmetry in the quark Yukawa interactions.
    Non-dynamical and integrated out; no physical predictions. The field carries an implicit flavor index and is eliminated exactly.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of N=1 Supersymmetric QCD on the lattice using overlap fermions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DIICDMBK

@misc{pith2026250716651,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: N=1 Supersymmetric QCD on the lattice using overlap fermions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DIICDMBK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.16651}
}
read the original abstract

Using N=1 Supersymmetric QCD (SQCD) as a prototype model, this work presents a formulation of overlap quarks and gluinos on the lattice, with particular emphasis on the construction of chirally symmetric Yukawa terms. By incorporating the Ginsparg-Wilson relation, chiral transformations, and the Majorana condition for gluinos, we construct a consistent framework that preserves a lattice-modified chiral symmetry and reduces the number of required counterterms compared to Wilson-type discretizations. The formulation introduces auxiliary fermionic fields to realize exact chiral symmetry in Yukawa interactions and enables a detailed analysis of the resulting matrix structures. Upon functionally integrating out the auxiliary fields, ultralocal interaction terms emerge as new contributions to the lattice action. This approach provides a robust foundation for nonperturbative lattice studies of supersymmetric gauge theories. Future work will focus on computing all perturbative fine-tunings required in this formulation to enable continuum matching and numerical simulations of SQCD.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.16651 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Feynman vertices derived from the additional contributions to the action, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages

  1. [22]

    Generalized Ginsparg-Wilson relations,

    M. Clancy, D. B. Kaplan and H. Singh, “Generalized Ginsparg-Wilson relations,” Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) no.1, 014502 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.014502 [arXiv:2309.08542 [hep-lat]]

    arXiv 2024

  2. [1]

    Confinement of Quarks,

    K. G. Wilson, “Confinement of Quarks,” Phys. Rev. D 10 (1974), 2445-2459 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.10.2445

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.10.2445 1974

  3. [2]

    A Remnant of Chiral Symmetry on the Lattice,

    P. H. Ginsparg and K. G. Wilson, “A Remnant of Chiral Symmetry on the Lattice,” Phys. Rev. D 25 (1982), 2649 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.25.2649

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.25.2649 1982

  4. [3]

    No Go Theorem for Regularizing Chiral Fermions,

    H. B. Nielsen and M. Ninomiya, “No Go Theorem for Regularizing Chiral Fermions,” Phys. Lett. B 105 (1981), 219-223 doi:10.1016/0370-2693(81)91026-1

    doi:10.1016/0370-2693(81)91026-1 1981

  5. [4]

    Supersymmetry on the lattice

    A. Feo, “Supersymmetry on the lattice,” Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.119 (2003), 198-209 doi:10.1016/S0920-5632(03)01507- X [arXiv:hep-lat/0210015]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2003

  6. [5]

    Deconstruction and other approaches to supersymmetric lattice field theories

    J. Giedt, “Deconstruction and other approaches to supersymmetric lattice field theories,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 21 (2006), 3039-3094 doi:10.1142/S0217751X06031752 [arXiv:hep-lat/0602007]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2006

  7. [6]

    Exact lattice supersymmetry,

    S. Catterall, D. B. Kaplan and M. Unsal, “Exact lattice supersymmetry,” Phys. Rept. 484 (2009), 71-130 doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2009.09.001 [arXiv:0903.4881 [hep-lat]]

    arXiv 2009

  8. [7]

    Complete supersymmetry on the lattice and a No-Go theorem: A simulation with intact supersymmetries on the lattice

    G. Bergner, “Complete supersymmetry on the lattice and a No-Go theorem,” JHEP 01 (2010), 024 doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2010)024 [arXiv:0909.4791 [hep-lat]]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2010

Show all 29 references
  1. [8]

    Progress in four-dimensional lattice supersymmetry,

    J. Giedt, “Progress in four-dimensional lattice supersymmetry,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 24 (2009), 4045-4095 doi:10.1142/S0217751X09045492 [arXiv:0903.2443 [hep-lat]]

    2009 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Supergauge Transformations in Four-Dimensions,

    J. Wess and B. Zumino, “Supergauge Transformations in Four-Dimensions,” Nucl. Phys. B 70 (1974), 39-50 doi:10.1016/0550-3213(74)90355-1

    1974 doi

  3. [10]

    On Combined Supersymmetric and Gauge Invariant Field Theories,

    B. de Wit and D. Z. Freedman, “On Combined Supersymmetric and Gauge Invariant Field Theories,” Phys. Rev. D 12 (1975) 2286

    1975

  4. [11]

    Supersymmetric QCD on the Lattice: An Exploratory Study,

    M. Costa and H. Panagopoulos, “Supersymmetric QCD on the Lattice: An Exploratory Study,” Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) no.3, 034507 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.034507 [arXiv:1706.05222 [hep-lat]]

    2017 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Supersymmetry and supergravity,

    J. Wess and J. Bagger, “Supersymmetry and supergravity,” Princeton University Press, 1992, ISBN 978-0-691-02530-8

    1992

  6. [13]

    A Supersymmetry primer,

    S. P. Martin, “A Supersymmetry primer,” Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys. 18 (1998), 1-98 doi:10.1142/9789812839657 0001 [arXiv:hep-ph/9709356]

    1998 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Supersymmetric gauge fixing and the effective potential

    R. D. C. Miller, “Supersymmetric gauge fixing and the effective potential”, Phys. Lett. B 129 (1983), 72. doi:10.1016/0370- 2693(83)90731-1 13

    1983 doi

  8. [15]

    Supersymmetric QCD: Renormalization and Mixing of Composite Operators,

    M. Costa and H. Panagopoulos, “Supersymmetric QCD: Renormalization and Mixing of Composite Operators,” Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) no.7, 074512 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.074512 [arXiv:1812.06770 [hep-lat]]

    2019 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Supersymmetric QCD on the lattice: Fine-tuning of the Yukawa couplings,

    M. Costa, H. Herodotou and H. Panagopoulos, “Supersymmetric QCD on the lattice: Fine-tuning of the Yukawa couplings,” Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) no.3, 035015 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.035015 [arXiv:2310.20207 [hep-lat]]

    2024 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Supersymmetric QCD on the lattice: Fine-tuning and counterterms for the quartic couplings,

    M. Costa, H. Herodotou and H. Panagopoulos, “Supersymmetric QCD on the lattice: Fine-tuning and counterterms for the quartic couplings,” Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) no.9, 094515 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.094515 [arXiv:2409.09089 [hep-lat]]

    2024 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Exactly massless quarks on the lattice,

    H. Neuberger, “Exactly massless quarks on the lattice,” Phys. Lett. B 417 (1998), 141-144 doi:10.1016/S0370- 2693(97)01368-3 [arXiv:hep-lat/9707022]

    1998 arXiv

  12. [19]

    More about exactly massless quarks on the lattice,

    H. Neuberger, “More about exactly massless quarks on the lattice,” Phys. Lett. B 427 (1998), 353-355 doi:10.1016/S0370- 2693(98)00355-4 [arXiv:hep-lat/9801031]

    1998 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Exact chiral symmetry on the lattice and the Ginsparg-Wilson relation,

    M. L¨ uscher, “Exact chiral symmetry on the lattice and the Ginsparg-Wilson relation,” Phys. Lett. B 428 (1998), 342-345 doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(98)00423-7 [arXiv:hep-lat/9802011]

    1998 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Abelian chiral gauge theories on the lattice with exact gauge invariance,

    M. L¨ uscher, “Abelian chiral gauge theories on the lattice with exact gauge invariance,” Nucl. Phys. B549 (1999), 295-334 doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(99)00115-7 [arXiv:hep-lat/9811032]

    1999 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Exact chiral symmetry, topological charge and related topics,

    F. Niedermayer, “Exact chiral symmetry, topological charge and related topics,” Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 73 (1999), 105-119 doi:10.1016/S0920-5632(99)85011-7 [arXiv:hep-lat/9810026 [hep-lat]]

    1999 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Lambda parameter of lattice QCD with the overlap Dirac operator,

    C. Alexandrou, H. Panagopoulos and E. Vicari, “Lambda parameter of lattice QCD with the overlap Dirac operator,” Nucl. Phys. B 571 (2000), 257-266 doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(99)00798-1 [arXiv:hep-lat/9909158]

    2000 arXiv

  17. [25]

    One loop renormalization of fermionic currents with the overlap Dirac operator,

    C. Alexandrou, E. Follana, H. Panagopoulos and E. Vicari, “One loop renormalization of fermionic currents with the overlap Dirac operator,” Nucl. Phys. B 580 (2000), 394-406 doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(00)00190-5 [arXiv:hep-lat/0002010]

    2000 arXiv

  18. [26]

    H. J. Rothe, Lattice Gauge Theories: An Introduction, 4th ed., World Scientific Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 82, World Scientific, Singapore, 2012. doi:10.1142/8334

    2012 doi

  19. [27]

    Axial vector current of exact chiral symmetry on the lattice,

    Y. Kikukawa and A. Yamada, “Axial vector current of exact chiral symmetry on the lattice,” Nucl. Phys. B 547 (1999), 413-423 doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(99)00059-0 [arXiv:hep-lat/9808026]

    1999 arXiv

  20. [28]

    QCD with overlap fermions: Running coupling and the 3-loop beta-function,

    M. Constantinou and H. Panagopoulos, “QCD with overlap fermions: Running coupling and the 3-loop beta-function,” Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007), 114504 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.76.114504 [arXiv:0709.4368 [hep-lat]]

    2007 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Gauge theories with overlap fermions in an arbitrary representation: Evaluation of the 3-loop beta-function,

    M. Constantinou and H. Panagopoulos, “Gauge theories with overlap fermions in an arbitrary representation: Evaluation of the 3-loop beta-function,” Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008), 057503 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.057503 [arXiv:0711.4665 [hep-lat]]

    2008 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.