Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

ALMA survey of a massive node of the Cosmic Web at $z\sim 3$. II. A dynamically cold and massive disk galaxy in the proximity of a hyperluminous quasar

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The galaxy beside a hyperluminous quasar at z=3.25 is a massive, dynamically cold rotating disk.

desk verdict Solid observational paper; the qualitative cold-disk claim holds, but the headline mass and rotation speed inherit an understated geometry uncertainty that the authors are honest about. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.16921 v1 pith:2KIY2GRB submitted 2025-07-22 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.CO

A. Pensabene , S. Cantalupo , W. Wang , C. Bacchini , F. Fraternali , M. Bischetti , C. Cicone , R. Decarli
show 6 more authors
G. Pezzulli M. Galbiati T. Lazeyras N. Ledos G. Quadri A. Travascio
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.CO
keywords high-redshiftgalaxiesquasarcompanionrotatingdiskkinematicsCO(4-3)linedynamicalmassmolecularoutflowscosmicwebenvironmentsALMAobservations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to establish that MQN01-QC, a galaxy lying about 10 kpc (projected) from the hyperluminous quasar QSO CTS G18.01 in a dense cosmic-web node at $z=3.25$, is a massive, rotationally supported, dynamically cold disk. From 0.3-arcsecond ALMA observations of the CO(4--3) line, the authors model the cold-gas kinematics and derive a maximum rotation speed near 513 km/s, a low velocity dispersion near 46 km/s, and hence a high degree of rotational support $V_{\rm rot}/\sigma\approx 11$, with a dynamical mass of $2.5\times10^{11}\,M_\odot$ inside roughly 4 kpc. If correct, this makes MQN01-QC the first quasar companion galaxy confirmed as a massive, dynamically cold rotating disk at such an early cosmic epoch, showing that ordered cold disks can survive in the densest environments of the early Universe. It also reframes the quasar as a possible satellite in an early-stage merger and attributes a broad, blueshifted component in the quasar's CO(4--3) line to a powerful molecular outflow or to tidal disturbance.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing tool is tilted-ring forward modeling of the CO(4--3) datacube. A Bayesian geometry fitter first fixes the disk inclination and position angle from the projected axis ratio via $\sin^2 i = 1-(b_{\min}/a_{\rm maj})^2$, assuming a razor-thin, intrinsically round, axisymmetric disk with negligible radial motions; a tilted-ring code then fits the rotation curve and velocity dispersion while convolving the model with the beam to correct for beam smearing, and a parametric code checks the result. The dynamical mass follows from $M_{\rm dyn}(<R)=v_{\rm circ}^2 R/G$ with the pressure-support correction negligible at $V_{\rm rot}/\sigma\sim 10$. The inclination is the parameter that translates observed velocities into intrinsic physics, since $V_{\rm rot}\propto 1/\sin i$ and $M_{\rm dyn}\propto 1/\sin^2 i$.

What would settle it

A higher-resolution ALMA observation that fits the disk with the inclination left free, or that resolves a warp or non-circular motions, would settle it: if the true inclination were near 26 degrees, $V_{\rm rot}$ would rise to roughly 770 km/s and the mass by a factor near 2.3, whereas evidence of an intrinsically oval or warped disk would break the shape-based inclination entirely.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

MQN01-QC is a massive, orderly rotating disk: forward modeling of the CO(4--3) datacube with a tilted-ring model, whose geometry is fixed by a Bayesian fit at inclination $i=40^{+10}_{-14}$ degrees under the assumption of a razor-thin, intrinsically round disk, yields a steeply rising rotation curve reaching $V_{\rm rot,max}=513^{+58}_{-64}$ km/s, a radially averaged dispersion of $46^{+12}_{-12}$ km/s, and a rotation-to-dispersion ratio $V_{\rm rot}/\sigma = 11^{+4}_{-3}$. An independent parametric fit gives $V_{\rm rot}/\sigma=10.0\pm0.2$. Under a spherical-mass approximation this implies a dynamical mass of $2.5^{+0.6}_{-1.1}\times10^{11}\,M_\odot$ within 4.1 kpc, making the galaxy the most massive and fastest-rotating disk found in the immediate proximity of a hyperluminous quasar. Despite the small separation, the disk shows no strong tidal disturbance, and tidal-radius estimates place the quasar host as the less massive (satellite) component in an early merger. The companion's molecular gas mass is about $6\times10^{10}\,M_\odot$ and its stellar mass about $9\times10^{10}\,M_\odot$ within 2.3 kpc, and the quasar's CO(4--3) profile carries a broad blueshifted wing (FWHM about 700 km/s, shifted by about $-300$ km/s) that may trace a molecular outflow or tidal disturbance.

Load-bearing premise

The rotation speed and dynamical mass rest on the assumption that the galaxy is a perfectly flat, circular disk whose 40-degree inclination is correctly read from its projected oval shape, with no radial gas motions, and the quoted uncertainties do not include the error in this angle.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • MQN01-QC becomes the first quasar companion galaxy confirmed as a massive, dynamically cold rotating disk at $z\sim3$, with $V_{\rm rot}/\sigma\approx11$ and $M_{\rm dyn}\approx2.5\times10^{11}\,M_\odot$ within about 4 kpc.
  • Ordered cold disks are able to survive in the densest known environments at cosmic noon, close to a hyperluminous quasar, with turbulence in line with the cosmic evolution trend and needing only about 5 percent supernova kinetic-energy coupling.
  • The quasar host is likely a satellite in an early-stage merger, since tidal-radius estimates imply negligible disturbance of the companion disk despite the blueshifted CO(4-3) wing in the quasar.
  • If the broad blueshifted component is a molecular outflow, its rate is roughly $1.7\times10^3\,M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$ and the molecular gas depletion time about 20 Myr, potentially quenching star formation in the quasar host quickly.
  • On the Tully-Fisher analogue, MQN01-QC falls in the parameter space of local massive early-type galaxies, suggesting an evolutionary link to today's most massive ellipticals.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the true inclination sits at the low end of its allowed range (about 26 degrees), MQN01-QC would be one of the fastest-rotating disk galaxies known at $z\sim3$, with $V_{\rm rot}$ near 770 km/s and a dynamical mass about 2.3 times higher; an independent tracer such as [C II] or a resolved higher-$J$ CO line could test this without relying on the projected axis ratio.
  • A deeper and wider mosaic around the pair could reveal gas streams or bridges between the two galaxies, which would test whether the dense cosmic-web node feeds the disk and the quasar through accretion rather than violent mergers.
  • The high dynamical mass concentrated within only about 4 kpc implies a very high baryon fraction in the inner region; if confirmed, this would be a strong constraint for galaxy formation models at high redshift.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper presents ALMA Band 3 observations at ~0.3 arcsec resolution of the CO(4-3) line and 3 mm continuum toward the quasar CTS G18.01 and its companion MQN01-QC at z ~ 3.25. The authors model the companion's kinematics as a rotating thin disk with 3DBarolo and GalPak3D, deriving a maximum rotation velocity of ~513 km/s, a velocity dispersion of ~46 km/s, Vrot/sigma ~ 11, and a dynamical mass of ~2.5e11 Msun within 4.1 kpc. They interpret MQN01-QC as a massive, dynamically cold rotating disk in a dense cosmic-web node, with the quasar possibly a satellite in an early-stage merger. They also report a broad blueshifted component in the quasar CO(4-3) profile that may trace an outflow or tidal disturbance.

Significance. If the central claim holds, this is the first quasar-companion galaxy at z~3 with a confirmed massive, dynamically cold rotating disk, with implications for disk survival in overdense environments and for the assembly of massive early-type galaxies. The kinematic analysis is careful: beam smearing is treated explicitly, two independent fitting codes (3DBarolo and GalPak3D) give consistent results, and the residuals are shown in spectra, position-velocity diagrams, and channel maps. The qualitative identification of MQN01-QC as a rotationally supported, low-dispersion disk is robust to the main geometric uncertainty, although the exact mass and rotation speed are not.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sect. 4.1.1 / Table 3, Eq. (4)-(5)] The derived rotation velocity and dynamical mass depend sensitively on the inclination measured by CANNUBI, i = 40(+10,-14) deg, and the paper explicitly notes that the reported kinematic uncertainties do not include the geometry uncertainty. Using Eq. (4) and Eq. (5), Vrot scales as 1/sin(i) and Mdyn as 1/sin^2(i). The quoted Vrot = 513 km/s and Mdyn = 2.5e11 Msun therefore correspond to a range of roughly Vrot ~ 420-770 km/s and Mdyn ~ 1.6-5.7e11 Msun when i is varied within its 1-sigma interval (i = 26-54 deg). This is a factor of about 2.3 in mass, much larger than the quoted statistical errors. Because the abstract and Section 5.1 present the exact mass and the 'most massive/fast rotating' comparison without this systematic range, the headline numbers are over-stated. I recommend propagating the full inclination posterior into Vrot and Mdyn (for example, by sampling over the CANNUBI chain or re-fitting with inclination free), and presenting the resulting ranges in the abstract and conclusions. The qualitative cold-disk identification is not threatened, since Vrot/sigma remains high (about 9-17) across the inclination range, but the quantitative claims require revision.
  2. [Sect. 5.1, Fig. 7] The comparison of MQN01-QC with the Tully-Fisher relation and with local massive early-type galaxies uses the adopted Mdyn = 2.5e11 Msun as an 'upper limit on the baryonic mass budget'. Given the inclination-driven range in Mdyn (1.6-5.7e11 Msun, see previous comment), the galaxy's position in these scaling relations shifts substantially, which could change the conclusion that it falls in the same parameter space as local ETGs. The authors should recompute this comparison using the propagated mass range, or explicitly state the sensitivity of the scaling-relation placement to the inclination assumed. This is directly relevant to the claim that MQN01-QC is a progenitor of today's massive ellipticals.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sect. 2.2] There is a typo: 'a su fficient sampling the beam minor axis' should read 'a sufficient sampling of the beam minor axis'. Also, 'The resulted angular resolution' should be 'The resulting angular resolution'.
  2. [Sect. 5.2] The phrase 'between between the galaxies' contains a duplicated word and should be corrected.
  3. [Sect. 5.2 / Fig. 8] The text states the blueshifted gas emission is detected 'albeit tentatively (S/N ? 1)'; the inequality symbol appears garbled and should be typeset correctly (probably 'S/N > 1' or 'S/N ~ 1').
  4. [Fig. 1 caption] The caption says the PSF-subtracted image is shown 'in the lower right half of the image below the dotted demarcation line', but the dotted line appears to divide the panel diagonally rather than horizontally; the description should match the figure layout.
  5. [Table 3] The table note that kinematic errors do not include geometry uncertainty is important and is correctly stated; however, this caveat is not repeated in the abstract or Section 6, which quote Vrot/sigma ~ 11 and Mdyn = 2.5e11 without the systematic range. I recommend carrying the caveat into the summary sections.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the cold-disk measurement is a direct kinematic model fit to the ALMA CO(4-3) data, and none of the derived quantities reduces by construction to the paper's conclusions.

full rationale

I find no step in which a derived quantity is, by the paper's own equations, equal to an input or to a prior self-citation. The central claim that MQN01-QC is a dynamically cold rotating disk rests on the observed double-peaked CO(4-3) profile, the resolved velocity gradient and low dispersion in the moment maps, and a forward 3DBarolo thin-disk model whose free parameters (Vrot and sigma) are fit to the data after fixing the geometry with CANNUBI. The explicitly stated limitation that the quoted kinematic errors do not include the geometry uncertainty is an accuracy caveat, not a circular construction: the inclination is obtained from the projected axis ratio, and Vrot, sigma, and Mdyn are outputs of the fit, not inputs imposed by the conclusion. Mdyn follows from Eq. 5 using the fitted Vrot and is not fed back into the fit; the tidal-radius exercise (Eq. 6) is a post-hoc consistency check that the authors themselves flag as relying on simplifying assumptions. The self-citations (Paper I, Galbiati et al. 2025, Travascio et al. 2025) provide the overdensity context and the stellar-mass calibration sample, but the disk detection and kinematics come from new, higher-resolution ALMA data and are independent of those works. No prediction is a renamed fitted parameter and no load-bearing argument reduces to a self-citation chain, so the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central kinematic claim rests primarily on the assumed disk geometry and on the CO line tracing a relaxed dynamical system. All other parameters are either measured directly from the data or adopted from external calibrations. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • Disk inclination angle i = 40 +10 -14 deg (CANNUBI posterior)
    Used to convert observed line-of-sight velocities to intrinsic rotation via Eq. 4. Vrot and Mdyn scale as 1/sin i and 1/sin^2 i, so this is the dominant systematic for the central mass and rotational-support claims. The paper does not propagate the inclination uncertainty into the kinematical errors.
  • Maximum rotation velocity Vrot,max = 513 +58 -64 km/s
    Best-fit parameter from 3DBarolo; central to the dynamical mass and the Vrot/sigma ratio. The independent GalPak3D fit gives 531 +/- 4 km/s.
  • Radially averaged velocity dispersion sigma_bar = 46 +12 -12 km/s
    Best-fit parameter from 3DBarolo; central to the Vrot/sigma ~ 11 coldness claim. GalPak3D gives sigma0 = 54 +/- 1 km/s.
  • CO-to-H2 conversion factor alpha_CO = 1.7 M_sun (K km/s pc2)^-1
    Adopted from an external local ULIRG sample (Montoya Arroyave et al. 2023) and used for molecular gas masses. Systematic uncertainty is not propagated. Does not affect the kinematic central claim.
  • CO(4-3)-to-CO(1-0) line ratio r41 = 0.87
    Adopted from Carilli & Walter 2013 to convert the CO(4-3) luminosity to a CO(1-0)-based H2 mass. External calibration, not central to the disk identification.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Lambda-CDM cosmology with Planck 2020 parameters (H0 = 67.7, Omega_m = 0.310)
    Used to convert angular scales, redshifts, and luminosities into physical distances and masses throughout the paper.
  • domain assumption The CO(4-3) emitting gas in MQN01-QC is an intrinsically round, razor-thin, axisymmetric disk with negligible radial motions (Vrad = 0)
    Section 4.1 and Eq. 4. Under this assumption the observed axial ratio gives i = 40 deg, and Vrot is derived from Vlos = Vsys + Vrot cos(phi) sin(i). If the gas is not in such a disk, the derived Vrot and dynamical mass change.
  • domain assumption Spherical mass distribution for the dynamical mass estimate
    Section 4.2, Eq. 5. The paper acknowledges that this likely overestimates the mass by at most 30% for a disk-dominated system and adds a 20% systematic toward lower mass.
  • domain assumption Pressure support is negligible, so v_circ is approximately Vrot
    Section 4.2. This follows from Vrot/sigma ~ 10, but it depends on the measured Vrot and sigma values.
  • domain assumption CO(4-3) emission traces the cold molecular gas and the enclosed dynamical mass within the observed radius
    Used to assign a dynamical radius from the CO extent. The measurement does not probe dark matter or baryonic mass outside the CO-emitting region.
  • domain assumption Standard conversion factors and dust SED assumptions derived locally apply at z~3
    Sections 3.3 and 3.4 use alpha_CO, r41, a modified blackbody with beta, and a mass-to-light calibration from external or same-field samples. Systematic uncertainties are acknowledged but not propagated.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of ALMA survey of a massive node of the Cosmic Web at $z\sim 3$. II. A dynamically cold and massive disk galaxy in the proximity of a hyperluminous quasar." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2KIY2GRB

@misc{pith2026250716921,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: ALMA survey of a massive node of the Cosmic Web at $z\sim 3$. II. A dynamically cold and massive disk galaxy in the proximity of a hyperluminous quasar},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2KIY2GRB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.16921}
}
abstract

Advancing our understanding of the formation and evolution of early massive galaxies and black holes requires detailed studies of dense structures in the high-redshift Universe. In this work, we present high-angular resolution ($\simeq0.3''$) ALMA observations targeting the CO(4--3) line and the underlying 3-mm dust continuum toward the Cosmic Web node MQN01, a region identified through deep multiwavelength surveys as one of the densest concentrations of galaxies and AGN at cosmic noon. At the center of this structure, we identify a massive, rotationally supported disk galaxy located approximately at $\sim10\,{\rm kpc}$ projected-distance and $\sim-300\,{\rm km\,s^{-1}}$ from a hyperluminous quasar at $z=3.2510$. By accurately modeling the cold gas kinematics, we determine a galaxy dynamical mass of $2.5\times10^{11}\,{M_{\odot}}$ within the inner $\simeq 4\,{\rm kpc}$, and a high degree of rotational support of $V_{\rm rot}/\sigma \approx 11$. This makes it the first quasar companion galaxy confirmed as a massive, dynamically cold rotating disk at such an early cosmic epoch. Despite the small projected separation from the quasar host, we find no clear evidence of strong tidal interactions affecting the galaxy disk. This might suggest that the quasar is a satellite galaxy in the early stages of a merger. Furthermore, our spectroscopic analysis reveals a broad, blueshifted component in the CO(4--3) line profile of the quasar host, which may trace a powerful molecular outflow or kinematic disturbances induced by its interaction with the massive companion galaxy. Our findings show that rotationally supported cold disks are able to survive even in high-density environments of the early Universe.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.16921 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Images of the MQN01-QC galaxy located ∼ 10 kpc south to the hyperluminous quasar QSO CTS G18.01 at z ≈ 3.2. Left panel: JWST/NIRCam F322W2 snapshot (Wang et al. 2025). Central panel: same as the left panel but with two rounds of quasar light removal (QSO - PSF). The result, shown in the lower right half of the image below the dotted demarcation line, provides a remarkably clearer view of the galaxy (indicated by the… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Continuum-subtracted CO(4–3) and CO(9–8) line of the QSO CTS G18.01 host galaxy (top and bottom panel), and the CO(4–3) line of the MQN01-QC (central panel). The data are reported in yellow. The black solid line shows the best-fit composite model. The gray shaded area shows the 1σ confidence interval of the best fit model. The indi￾vidual Gaussian components are reported in red and blue for the quasar line profile. … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The CO(4–3) line-velocity integrated map (moment 0th, left panel), the line-of-sight velocity field (Vlos, moment 1st, central panel), and the line-of-sight velocity dispersion field (σlos, moment 2nd, right panel) of the quasar host–MQN01-QC galaxy system. These maps are obtained from the continuum-subtracted ALMA datacube using channels within [−700; +400] km s−1 around the quasar systemic redshift (Vlos = 0). The… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Dust SED modeling of the quasar host (red circles) and the MQN01-QC galaxy (blue diamonds). The solid and dashed lines show the best-fit modified blackbody models for different assumptions on the dust temperature. The 1σ confidence intervals on the best fit are reporte…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Geometrical and kinematical modeling results as obtained with CANNUBI and 3DBarolo. Left panel: the observed CO(4–3) line-velocity integrated map overlaid with the best-fit model. The black and red contours show the [4, 16]σ isophotes of the data and the model, respect…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Redshift distribution of the mean velocity dispersion (left panel), and the degree of rotational support (right panel) for a sample of main￾sequence and starburst galaxy disks. Datapoints are taken from Rizzo et al. (2020, 2021, 2023, 2024); Fraternali et al. (2021); G…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Velocity curves of z ? 1.5 main-sequence and starburst galaxy disks from Rizzo et al. (2020, 2021); Fraternali et al. (2021); Lelli et al. (2023); Roman-Oliveira et al. (2023), and those of giant spiral galaxies discovered in z ∼ 3 protoclusters (ADF22.A1, Umehata et a…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Search for gas emission around galaxies. Top panel: The back￾ground image and gray contours represent the total CO(4–3) and CO(9– 8) intensity map, respectively. These are obtained within ∆3QSO = [−700; +400] km s−1 . The red and blue contours on the quasar host galaxy…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A quiescent galaxy in a gas-rich cosmic web node at z~3

    astro-ph.GA 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A z≈3.25 massive galaxy with SFR >1 dex below the main sequence and no molecular gas is embedded in a bright, turbulent Lyα/Hα CGM, possibly quenched by a jet from a nearby AGN.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

131 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Alexander, D. M. & Hickox, R. C. 2012, New A Rev., 56, 93

    2012

  2. [2]

    L., Birkin, J

    Amvrosiadis, A., Wardlow, J. L., Birkin, J. E., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 536, 3757 Anglés-Alcázar, D., Faucher-Giguère, C.-A., Quataert, E., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 472, L109 Arrigoni Battaia, F., Obreja, A., Chen, C. C., et al. 2023, A&A, 676, A51 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Lim, P. L., et al. 2022, ApJ, 935, 167 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whela...

    2025

  3. [3]

    2020, A&A, 641, A70

    Bacchini, C., Fraternali, F., Iorio, G., et al. 2020, A&A, 641, A70

    2020

  4. [4]

    2024, A&A, 687, A115

    Bacchini, C., Nipoti, C., Iorio, G., et al. 2024, A&A, 687, A115

    2024

  5. [5]

    C., Carniani, S., DeGraf, C., & Wagg, J

    Banerji, M., Jones, G. C., Carniani, S., DeGraf, C., & Wagg, J. 2021, MNRAS, 503, 5583

    2021

  6. [6]

    J., et al

    Beelen, A., Cox, P., Benford, D. J., et al. 2006, ApJ, 642, 694

    2006

  7. [7]

    Begeman, K. G. 1987, PhD thesis, - Béthermin, M., Fudamoto, Y ., Ginolfi, M., et al. 2020, A&A, 643, A2

    1987

  8. [8]

    & Tremaine, S

    Binney, J. & Tremaine, S. 2008, Galactic Dynamics: Second Edition

    2008

Show all 131 references
  1. [9]

    2024, ApJ, 970, 9

    Bischetti, M., Choi, H., Fiore, F., et al. 2024, ApJ, 970, 9

    2024

  2. [10]

    2021, A&A, 645, A33

    Bischetti, M., Feruglio, C., Piconcelli, E., et al. 2021, A&A, 645, A33

    2021

  3. [11]

    2018, A&A, 617, A82

    Bischetti, M., Piconcelli, E., Feruglio, C., et al. 2018, A&A, 617, A82

    2018

  4. [12]

    2017, A&A, 598, A122

    Bischetti, M., Piconcelli, E., Vietri, G., et al. 2017, A&A, 598, A122

    2017

  5. [13]

    D., Wolfire, M., & Leroy, A

    Bolatto, A. D., Wolfire, M., & Leroy, A. K. 2013, ARA&A, 51, 207

    2013

  6. [14]

    J., et al

    Borisova, E., Cantalupo, S., Lilly, S. J., et al. 2016, ApJ, 831, 39

    2016

  7. [15]

    1978, PhD thesis, - Bouché, N., Carfantan, H., Schroetter, I., Michel-Dansac, L., & Contini, T

    Bosma, A. 1978, PhD thesis, - Bouché, N., Carfantan, H., Schroetter, I., Michel-Dansac, L., & Contini, T. 2015, AJ, 150, 92

    1978

  8. [16]

    2018, A&A, 612, A29

    Brusa, M., Cresci, G., Daddi, E., et al. 2018, A&A, 612, A29

    2018

  9. [17]

    2010, ApJ, 725, 2324

    Burkert, A., Genzel, R., Bouché, N., et al. 2010, ApJ, 725, 2324

    2010

  10. [18]

    2006, MNRAS, 366, 1126

    Cappellari, M., Bacon, R., Bureau, M., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 366, 1126

    2006

  11. [19]

    Carilli, C. L. & Walter, F. 2013, ARA&A, 51, 105

    2013

  12. [20]

    2015, A&A, 580, A102

    Carniani, S., Marconi, A., Maiolino, R., et al. 2015, A&A, 580, A102

    2015

  13. [21]

    Casey, C. M. 2012, MNRAS, 425, 3094

    2012

  14. [22]

    C., Blain, A

    Chapman, S. C., Blain, A. W., Smail, I., & Ivison, R. J. 2005, ApJ, 622, 772

    2005

  15. [23]

    2012, A&A, 543, A99

    Cicone, C., Feruglio, C., Maiolino, R., et al. 2012, A&A, 543, A99

    2012

  16. [24]

    2014, A&A, 562, A21 13 http://www.astropy.org Article number, page 13 of 16 A&A proofs: manuscript no

    Cicone, C., Maiolino, R., Sturm, E., et al. 2014, A&A, 562, A21 13 http://www.astropy.org Article number, page 13 of 16 A&A proofs: manuscript no. aa54769-25 da Cunha, E., Groves, B., Walter, F., et al. 2013, ApJ, 766, 13

    2014

  17. [25]

    A., Greene, J., Ma, C.-P., et al

    Davis, T. A., Greene, J., Ma, C.-P., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 455, 214 de Blok, W. J. G. & Walter, F. 2014, AJ, 147, 96

    2016

  18. [26]

    2019, ApJ, 880, 157

    Decarli, R., Dotti, M., Bañados, E., et al. 2019, ApJ, 880, 157

    2019

  19. [27]

    2022, A&A, 662, A60

    Decarli, R., Pensabene, A., Venemans, B., et al. 2022, A&A, 662, A60

    2022

  20. [28]

    P., et al

    Decarli, R., Walter, F., Venemans, B. P., et al. 2017, Nature, 545, 457

    2017

  21. [29]

    P., et al

    Decarli, R., Walter, F., Venemans, B. P., et al. 2018, ApJ, 854, 97

    2018

  22. [30]

    Deconto-Machado, A., del Olmo Orozco, A., Marziani, P., Perea, J., & Stirpe, G. M. 2023, A&A, 669, A83

    2023

  23. [31]

    2009b, ApJ, 703, 785 Di Teodoro, E

    Dekel, A., Sari, R., & Ceverino, D. 2009b, ApJ, 703, 785 Di Teodoro, E. M. & Fraternali, F. 2015, MNRAS, 451, 3021

    2015

  24. [32]

    D., et al

    Ding, X., Onoue, M., Silverman, J. D., et al. 2023, Nature, 621, 51

    2023

  25. [33]

    D., & Onoue, M

    Ding, X., Silverman, J. D., & Onoue, M. 2022, ApJ, 939, L28 Dudzeviˇci¯ut˙e, U., Smail, I., Swinbank, A. M., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 494, 3828

    2022

  26. [34]

    2000, MNRAS, 315, 115

    Dunne, L., Eales, S., Edmunds, M., et al. 2000, MNRAS, 315, 115

    2000

  27. [35]

    2017, A&A, 604, A67

    Duras, F., Bongiorno, A., Piconcelli, E., et al. 2017, A&A, 604, A67

    2017

  28. [36]

    2024, ApJ, 974, 275

    Eilers, A.-C., Mackenzie, R., Pizzati, E., et al. 2024, ApJ, 974, 275

    2024

  29. [37]

    2012, MNRAS, 422, 1394

    Elitzur, M., Asensio Ramos, A., & Ceccarelli, C. 2012, MNRAS, 422, 1394

    2012

  30. [38]

    Emonts, B. H. C., Lehnert, M. D., Yoon, I., et al. 2023, Science, 379, 1323

    2023

  31. [39]

    2010, MNRAS, 401, 2113

    Epinat, B., Amram, P., Balkowski, C., & Marcelin, M. 2010, MNRAS, 401, 2113

    2010

  32. [40]

    2009, A&A, 504, 789

    Epinat, B., Contini, T., Le Fèvre, O., et al. 2009, A&A, 504, 789

    2009

  33. [41]

    2010, ApJ, 721, 607

    Feruglio, C., Aussel, H., Le Floc’h, E., et al. 2010, ApJ, 721, 607

    2010

  34. [42]

    2017, A&A, 608, A30

    Feruglio, C., Ferrara, A., Bischetti, M., et al. 2017, A&A, 608, A30

    2017

  35. [43]

    2017, A&A, 601, A143

    Fiore, F., Feruglio, C., Shankar, F., et al. 2017, A&A, 601, A143

    2017

  36. [44]

    2019, MNRAS, 483, 4586

    Fluetsch, A., Maiolino, R., Carniani, S., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 483, 4586

    2019

  37. [45]

    K., Drouart, G., Lagos, C

    Fogasy, J., Knudsen, K. K., Drouart, G., Lagos, C. D. P., & Fan, L. 2020, MN- RAS, 493, 3744

    2020

  38. [46]

    W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J

    Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. 2013, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 125, 306 Förster Schreiber, N. M., Renzini, A., Mancini, C., et al. 2018, ApJS, 238, 21

    2013

  39. [47]

    2021, A&A, 647, A194

    Fraternali, F., Karim, A., Magnelli, B., et al. 2021, A&A, 647, A194

    2021

  40. [48]

    A., Schouws, S., et al

    Fudamoto, Y ., Oesch, P. A., Schouws, S., et al. 2021, Nature, 597, 489

    2021

  41. [49]

    2025, A&A, 696, A95 García-Vergara, C., Hennawi, J

    Galbiati, M., Cantalupo, S., Steidel, C., et al. 2025, A&A, 696, A95 García-Vergara, C., Hennawi, J. F., Barrientos, L. F., & Rix, H.-W. 2017, ApJ, 848, 7

    2025

  42. [50]

    2022, Nature Communications, 13, 4574

    Ginolfi, M., Piconcelli, E., Zappacosta, L., et al. 2022, Nature Communications, 13, 4574

    2022

  43. [51]

    B., Bolatto, A

    Girard, M., Fisher, D. B., Bolatto, A. D., et al. 2021, ApJ, 909, 12

    2021

  44. [52]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357

    2020

  45. [53]

    2016, MNRAS, 457, 4179

    Harris, K., Farrah, D., Schulz, B., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 457, 4179

    2016

  46. [54]

    2020, A&A, 635, A47

    Herrera-Camus, R., Janssen, A., Sturm, E., et al. 2020, A&A, 635, A47

    2020

  47. [55]

    2019, ApJ, 871, 37

    Herrera-Camus, R., Tacconi, L., Genzel, R., et al. 2019, ApJ, 871, 37

    2019

  48. [56]

    A., Carilli, C

    Hodge, J. A., Carilli, C. L., Walter, F., et al. 2012, ApJ, 760, 11

    2012

  49. [57]

    A., Smail, I., Walter, F., et al

    Hodge, J. A., Smail, I., Walter, F., et al. 2019, ApJ, 876, 130 Högbom, J. A. 1974, A&AS, 15, 417

    2019

  50. [58]

    F., Kereš, D., Oñorbe, J., et al

    Hopkins, P. F., Kereš, D., Oñorbe, J., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 445, 581

    2014

  51. [59]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science Engineering, 9, 90

    2007

  52. [60]

    R., Indebetouw, R., Brogan, C

    Hunter, T. R., Indebetouw, R., Brogan, C. L., et al. 2023, PASP, 135, 074501

    2023

  53. [61]

    S., Aretxaga, I., et al

    Iono, D., Yun, M. S., Aretxaga, I., et al. 2016, ApJ, 829, L10

    2016

  54. [62]

    2017, MNRAS, 466, 4159

    Iorio, G., Fraternali, F., Nipoti, C., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 466, 4159

    2017

  55. [63]

    J., Matthee, J., et al

    Kashino, D., Lilly, S. J., Matthee, J., et al. 2023, ApJ, 950, 66

    2023

  56. [64]

    2019, MNRAS, 1423

    Kohandel, M., Pallottini, A., Ferrara, A., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 1423

    2019

  57. [65]

    2024, A&A, 685, A72

    Kohandel, M., Pallottini, A., Ferrara, A., et al. 2024, A&A, 685, A72

    2024

  58. [66]

    2023, A&A, 673, A16 Kovács, A., Chapman, S

    Kouroumpatzakis, K., Zezas, A., Kyritsis, E., Salim, S., & Svoboda, J. 2023, A&A, 673, A16 Kovács, A., Chapman, S. C., Dowell, C. D., et al. 2006, ApJ, 650, 592

    2023

  59. [67]

    2001, MNRAS, 322, 231

    Kroupa, P. 2001, MNRAS, 322, 231

    2001

  60. [68]

    Kulkarni, G., Worseck, G., & Hennawi, J. F. 2019, MNRAS, 488, 1035

    2019

  61. [69]

    2013, ApJ, 772, 103

    Leipski, C., Meisenheimer, K., Walter, F., et al. 2013, ApJ, 772, 103

    2013

  62. [70]

    M., Fraternali, F., et al

    Lelli, F., Di Teodoro, E. M., Fraternali, F., et al. 2021, Science, 371, 713

    2021

  63. [71]

    G., et al

    Lelli, F., Zhang, Z.-Y ., Bisbas, T. G., et al. 2023, A&A, 672, A106

    2023

  64. [72]

    & Dickinson, M

    Madau, P. & Dickinson, M. 2014, ARA&A, 52, 415

    2014

  65. [73]

    R., Hollenbach, D

    Maloney, P. R., Hollenbach, D. J., & Tielens, A. G. G. M. 1996, ApJ, 466, 561

    1996

  66. [74]

    2019, A&A, 631, A50

    Marasco, A., Fraternali, F., Heald, G., et al. 2019, A&A, 631, A50

    2019

  67. [75]

    A., Wyithe, J

    Marshall, M. A., Wyithe, J. S. B., Windhorst, R. A., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 506, 1209

    2021

  68. [76]

    P., Waters, B., Schiebel, D., Young, W., & Golap, K

    McMullin, J. P., Waters, B., Schiebel, D., Young, W., & Golap, K. 2007, in As- tronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVI, V ol. 376, 127

    2007

  69. [77]

    E., Weiß, A., et al

    Meijerink, R., Kristensen, L. E., Weiß, A., et al. 2013, ApJ, 762, L16 Montoya Arroyave, I., Cicone, C., Makroleivaditi, E., et al. 2023, A&A, 673, A13

    2013

  70. [78]

    J., Condon, J

    Murphy, E. J., Condon, J. J., Schinnerer, E., et al. 2011, ApJ, 737, 67

    2011

  71. [79]

    2019, ApJ, 882, 10

    Neeleman, M., Bañados, E., Walter, F., et al. 2019, ApJ, 882, 10

    2019

  72. [80]

    P., et al

    Neeleman, M., Novak, M., Venemans, B. P., et al. 2021, ApJ, 911, 141

    2021

  73. [81]

    X., Kanekar, N., & Rafelski, M

    Neeleman, M., Prochaska, J. X., Kanekar, N., & Rafelski, M. 2020, Nature, 581, 269

    2020

  74. [82]

    G., Mobasher, B., et al

    Pacifici, C., Iyer, K. G., Mobasher, B., et al. 2023, ApJ, 944, 141

    2023

  75. [83]

    2024, A&A, 684, A119

    Pensabene, A., Cantalupo, S., Cicone, C., et al. 2024, A&A, 684, A119

    2024

  76. [84]

    2020, A&A, 637, A84

    Pensabene, A., Carniani, S., Perna, M., et al. 2020, A&A, 637, A84

    2020

  77. [85]

    2021, A&A, 652, A66

    Pensabene, A., Decarli, R., Bañados, E., et al. 2021, A&A, 652, A66

    2021

  78. [86]

    K., Hatziminaoglou, E., Feltre, A., et al

    Pitchford, L. K., Hatziminaoglou, E., Feltre, A., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 462, 4067 Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y ., et al. 2020, A&A, 641, A6

    2016

  79. [87]

    Polletta, M., Nesvadba, N. P. H., Neri, R., et al. 2011, A&A, 533, A20

    2011

  80. [88]

    2023, MNRAS, 519, 1526

    Popesso, P., Concas, A., Cresci, G., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 519, 1526

    2023

  81. [89]

    H., Übler, H., Förster Schreiber, N

    Price, S. H., Übler, H., Förster Schreiber, N. M., et al. 2022, A&A, 665, A159

    2022

  82. [90]

    B., Fogarty, K., Debes, J

    Ren, B. B., Fogarty, K., Debes, J. H., et al. 2024, A&A, 683, L5

    2024

  83. [91]

    T., Lacy, M., Storrie-Lombardi, L

    Richards, G. T., Lacy, M., Storrie-Lombardi, L. J., et al. 2006, ApJS, 166, 470

    2006

  84. [92]

    A., Walter, F., Bertoldi, F., et al

    Riechers, D. A., Walter, F., Bertoldi, F., et al. 2009, ApJ, 703, 1338

    2009

  85. [93]

    2023, PASP, 135, 048001

    Rigby, J., Perrin, M., McElwain, M., et al. 2023, PASP, 135, 048001

    2023

  86. [94]

    2024, A&A, 689, A273

    Rizzo, F., Bacchini, C., Kohandel, M., et al. 2024, A&A, 689, A273

    2024

  87. [95]

    2023, A&A, 679, A129

    Rizzo, F., Roman-Oliveira, F., Fraternali, F., et al. 2023, A&A, 679, A129

    2023

  88. [96]

    R., & Powell, D

    Rizzo, F., Vegetti, S., Fraternali, F., Stacey, H. R., & Powell, D. 2021, MNRAS, 507, 3952

    2021

  89. [97]

    2020, Nature, 584, 201

    Rizzo, F., Vegetti, S., Powell, D., et al. 2020, Nature, 584, 201

    2020

  90. [98]

    H., Lockhart, I

    Rogstad, D. H., Lockhart, I. A., & Wright, M. C. H. 1974, ApJ, 193, 309

    1974

  91. [99]

    2023, MNRAS, 521, 1045

    Roman-Oliveira, F., Fraternali, F., & Rizzo, F. 2023, MNRAS, 521, 1045

    2023

  92. [100]

    2024, A&A, 687, A35

    Roman-Oliveira, F., Rizzo, F., & Fraternali, F. 2024, A&A, 687, A35

    2024

  93. [101]

    E., Hodge, J., Bouwens, R., et al

    Rowland, L. E., Hodge, J., Bouwens, R., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 535, 2068

    2024

  94. [102]

    S., Veilleux, S., & Sanders, D

    Rupke, D. S., Veilleux, S., & Sanders, D. B. 2005, ApJS, 160, 115

    2005

  95. [103]

    A., Bower, R

    Schaye, J., Crain, R. A., Bower, R. G., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 446, 521 Schöier, F. L., van der Tak, F. F. S., van Dishoeck, E. F., & Black, J. H. 2005, A&A, 432, 369

    2015

  96. [104]

    M., Downes, D., Radford, S

    Solomon, P. M., Downes, D., Radford, S. J. E., & Barrett, J. W. 1997, ApJ, 478, 144

    1997

  97. [105]

    A., Lyu, J., Rieke, G

    Stone, M. A., Lyu, J., Rieke, G. H., & Alberts, S. 2023, ApJ, 953, 180

    2023

  98. [106]

    J., Genzel, R., Neri, R., et al

    Tacconi, L. J., Genzel, R., Neri, R., et al. 2010, Nature, 463, 781

    2010

  99. [107]

    S., et al

    Tadaki, K., Iono, D., Yun, M. S., et al. 2018, Nature, 560, 613

    2018

  100. [108]

    N., Franx, M., Brinchmann, J., van der Wel, A., & van Dokkum, P

    Taylor, E. N., Franx, M., Brinchmann, J., van der Wel, A., & van Dokkum, P. G. 2010, ApJ, 722, 1

    2010

  101. [109]

    2017, ApJ, 836, 8

    Trakhtenbrot, B., Lira, P., Netzer, H., et al. 2017, ApJ, 836, 8

    2017

  102. [110]

    2025, A&A, 694, A165

    Travascio, A., Cantalupo, S., Tozzi, P., et al. 2025, A&A, 694, A165

    2025

  103. [111]

    2024, A&A, 689, A220

    Tripodi, R., Feruglio, C., Fiore, F., et al. 2024, A&A, 689, A220

    2024

  104. [112]

    Tully, R. B. & Fisher, J. R. 1977, A&A, 54, 661

    1977

  105. [113]

    J., Cirasuolo, M., Harrison, C

    Turner, O. J., Cirasuolo, M., Harrison, C. M., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 471, 1280

    2017

  106. [114]

    2018, PASJ, 70, S32

    Uchiyama, H., Toshikawa, J., Kashikawa, N., et al. 2018, PASJ, 70, S32

    2018

  107. [115]

    C., Smail, I., et al

    Umehata, H., Steidel, C. C., Smail, I., et al. 2025, PASJ

    2025

  108. [116]

    Urrutia, T., Lacy, M., & Becker, R. H. 2008, ApJ, 674, 80

    2008

  109. [117]

    Vallini, L., Tielens, A. G. G. M., Pallottini, A., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 490, 4502 van der Wel, A., van Houdt, J., Bezanson, R., et al. 2022, ApJ, 936, 9

    2019

  110. [118]

    A., et al

    Vayner, A., Zakamska, N., Wright, S. A., et al. 2021, ApJ, 923, 59

    2021

  111. [119]

    2017, ApJ, 843, 18

    Veilleux, S., Bolatto, A., Tombesi, F., et al. 2017, ApJ, 843, 18

    2017

  112. [120]

    2013, ApJ, 776, 27

    Veilleux, S., Meléndez, M., Sturm, E., et al. 2013, ApJ, 776, 27

    2013

  113. [121]

    P., Neeleman, M., Walter, F., et al

    Venemans, B. P., Neeleman, M., Walter, F., et al. 2019, ApJ, 874, L30

    2019

  114. [122]

    2024, ApJ, 977, 161

    Venkateshwaran, A., Weiss, A., Sulzenauer, N., et al. 2024, ApJ, 977, 161

    2024

  115. [123]

    E., et al

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, Nature Methods, 17, 261 V ogelsberger, M., Marinacci, F., Torrey, P., & Puchwein, E. 2020, Nature Re- views Physics, 2, 42 V olonteri, M., Capelo, P. R., Netzer, H., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 1470

    2020

  116. [124]

    2004, ApJ, 615, L17

    Walter, F., Carilli, C., Bertoldi, F., et al. 2004, ApJ, 615, L17

    2004

  117. [125]

    L., et al

    Wang, R., Wagg, J., Carilli, C. L., et al. 2013, ApJ, 773, 44

    2013

  118. [126]

    2025, Nature Astronomy, 9, 710 Weiß, A., Neininger, N., Hüttemeister, S., & Klein, U

    Wang, W., Cantalupo, S., Pensabene, A., et al. 2025, Nature Astronomy, 9, 710 Weiß, A., Neininger, N., Hüttemeister, S., & Klein, U. 2001, A&A, 365, 571

    2025

  119. [127]

    J., Bergeron, J., & Omont, A

    Willott, C. J., Bergeron, J., & Omont, A. 2015, ApJ, 801, 123

    2015

  120. [128]

    M., Fossati, M., et al

    Wisnioski, E., Förster Schreiber, N. M., Fossati, M., et al. 2019, ApJ, 886, 124

    2019

  121. [129]

    Y ., Elbaz, D., Gómez-Guijarro, C., et al

    Xiao, M. Y ., Elbaz, D., Gómez-Guijarro, C., et al. 2023, A&A, 672, A18

    2023

  122. [130]

    L., Hamann, F., Pâris, I., et al

    Zakamska, N. L., Hamann, F., Pâris, I., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 459, 3144

    2016

  123. [131]

    0.0" -1.0

    Zhang, Z.-Y ., Papadopoulos, P. P., Ivison, R. J., et al. 2016, Royal Society Open Science, 3, 160025 Article number, page 14 of 16 Pensabene et al.: The ALMA view of MQN01 field Appendix A: Geometrical parameters of the MQN01-QC galaxy disk derived with CANNUBI The Fig. A.1 s...

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.