Occupation-Driven emission asynchronous as a Fundamental Constraint on Solid-State Attosecond Pulses

Jun-Wei Luo; Kang Lai; Lin-Wang Wang; Qing-Guo Fan; Wen-Hao Liu; Zhi Wang

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 62 references

Occupation-Driven emission asynchronous as a Fundamental Constraint on Solid-State Attosecond Pulses

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that electron band occupation, not the laser field alone, sets the timing of attosecond pulses emitted by solids.

desk verdict A plausible symmetry-based mechanism for delayed interband emission in solid-state HHG, but the 'occupation-driven' claim is not supported by the paper's own analytic derivation, and the headline trend rests on fragile filtering. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.18019 v2 pith:NDWBWMCU submitted 2025-07-24 physics.optics physics.atom-ph

Qing-Guo Fan , Kang Lai , Wen-hao Liu , Zhi Wang , Lin-Wang Wang , Jun-Wei Luo This is my paper · ORCID

classification physics.opticsphysics.atom-ph PACS 42.65.Ky

keywords attosecondpulsetrainssolid-statehigh-harmonicgenerationelectronoccupationdynamicstransitiondipolemomentsymmetrytime-dependentdensityfunctionaltheorysemiconductorBlochequationsbulksiliconisolatedpulses

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the temporal shape of attosecond pulse trains emitted by a solid under intense mid-infrared light is set by the time-dependent occupation of electrons in each energy band, not just by the laser field. Using real-time time-dependent density functional theory on bulk silicon, the authors show that when the field is strong enough to populate higher conduction bands, a symmetry-forbidden interband channel recombines only at the $\Gamma$ point half a laser cycle later, so part of the emission lags the field-synchronous part and the pulse broadens. They derive an occupation-resolved expression for the attosecond pulse train and reproduce the delayed occupation with a three-band semiconductor Bloch model. Because the delayed channel turns on and then loses to normal interband emission, the pulse width varies nonmonotonically with intensity. If correct, this identifies a time-domain constraint on solid-state attosecond sources that acts independently of material damage thresholds.

What carries the argument

The central object is the time-dependent band occupation $O^{(e)}_{l,k}(t)$ in the adiabatic Kohn-Sham basis, because it appears directly inside the attosecond pulse train expression. The mechanism is carried by the transition dipole moment between the valence band maximum and the conduction band CBM+3, which is nonzero only at $\Gamma$ under the laser polarization; recombination through it is therefore delayed by half a laser cycle. The authors support the TDDFT result with a one-dimensional three-band semiconductor Bloch equation, using one valence band and two conduction bands with a single dephasing time $T_2 = 484\ \mathrm{as}$, which reproduces the occupation delay.

What would settle it

An experimental or independent computational test would be to measure, or recalculate with fully k-resolved transition dipoles, the time-resolved harmonic emission of silicon from 0.1 to 1.0 TW/cm$^2$; if no emission component appears roughly half a laser cycle after the driving-field peak at high intensity, or if the filtered pulse width changes monotonically instead of nonmonotonically, the asynchronous-occupation mechanism is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the time-resolved emission of a solid can be written as a sum of a field-synchronous term $N_e \mathbf{E}(t)$ and an occupation-weighted ionic-potential term $\int_\Omega d^3r\, \sum_{l,k} O^{(e)}_{l,k}(t)\, \varphi^*_{l,k}(t)\varphi_{l,k}(t)\,\nabla v_{\mathrm{ion}}(\mathbf{r})$, so the attosecond pulse train is governed by which Kohn-Sham orbitals are occupied at each instant. In bulk silicon at low intensity, the occupied states follow the field half-cycle and the pulse tracks the laser; at high intensity, occupation of higher bands lags the field. The lag is traced to the transition dipole moment between the valence band maximum and the band called CBM+3, which is nonzero only at the $\Gamma$ point, so recombination through that channel can happen only after the electron is carried back to $\Gamma$ half a cycle later. This asynchronous occupation delays part of the emission and broadens the pulse, and the competition among intraband, normal interband, and anomalous interband emission produces a nonmonotonic dependence of the pulse width on intensity.

Load-bearing premise

The explanation rests on the assumption that the transition from the top valence band to the conduction band labeled CBM+3 can really occur only at the $\Gamma$ point in reciprocal space; if that restriction is wrong, the delayed recombination and the predicted pulse broadening would not occur.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Isolated attosecond pulse extraction from solid-state high-harmonic generation is harder than the intraband-only picture suggests, because the delayed anomalous channel adds emission after the main burst.
The attosecond pulse width is not a simple saturation curve: it first grows as the anomalous interband channel turns on, then shrinks as normal interband emission dominates.
The same mechanism predicts that time-domain attosecond pulse characterization must report intensity together with pulse center and width, since all three change with field strength.
Materials with no symmetry-forbidden high-lying conduction-band recombination channels should preserve shorter pulses at high intensity.
The occupation-resolved derivation gives a quantitative criterion for searching laser parameters that minimize the delay when generating isolated attosecond pulses.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The authors leave implicit that the predicted band-resolved occupation delay could be observed directly with time-resolved photoemission or transient absorption, giving a band-selective probe of emission timing.
Extending to nearby problems, strain or alloying that shifts the CBM+1/CBM+3 band crossing should tune the intensity at which the pulse width maximum occurs.
A practical corollary the authors do not draw is that a single intensity value cannot define the temporal quality of a solid-state attosecond source; pulse width, center, and yield must be mapped together.
In a neighboring geometry, the same mechanism should appear in two-dimensional semiconductors with multiple conduction bands and symmetry-forbidden dipoles, where the delay may be tunable by stacking or twist angle.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

You should know two things. First, the paper reports a plausible mechanism for why attosecond pulse trains from bulk silicon broaden non-monotonically with laser intensity: certain interband recombination channels are symmetry-forbidden except at the Gamma point, so those carriers recombine half a cycle later, and the mixture of normal and 'anomalous' interband emission broadens the pulse. The TDDFT calculation looks standard, reproduces the experimental HHG spectra, and the 1D Bloch equations qualitatively reproduce the delay. Second, the paper's headline claim that 'APT can be characterized by the occupation of electrons' is not backed by its own equations. The analytic derivation in Appendix C expands n(r,t) in the adiabatic basis and keeps only diagonal terms (Eq. 11), which is an intraband-only expression. Interband emission, including the delayed recombination the paper cares about, is mediated by off-diagonal coherence—the SBE's own emission formula (Eq. 19) is exactly that. So the derivation does not show occupation drives emission timing; at best, occupations are correlated with the coherence dynamics. The stress-test note is right about this.

What is new and good: the symmetry analysis of the transition dipoles (VBM-CBM+3 TDM only at Gamma) is a nice observation, and using it to explain the delayed 'anomalous' emission is a legitimate new contribution. The paper also does the right thing in acknowledging that its analytical expression reduces to ref [25]. The TDDFT setup is solid and matches experimental silicon HHG. The authors are transparent about approximations: no dephasing in TDDFT, a single T2 in the SBE, and a k.p extension of the TDM.

Where it is soft: (1) The causal claim is overstated. The title and abstract say 'occupation-driven' and 'fundamental constraint', but the paper demonstrates a correlation, not a derivation, and only in silicon. A single material with a specific TDM structure is not a fundamental constraint. (2) The central nonmonotonic FWHM result is produced by low-pass filtering with cutoff 4.3 eV (chosen as the upper limit of the lowest-intensity signal) and then selecting the maximum peak. There are no error bars, no sensitivity to the cutoff, and no discussion of how peak selection affects the trend. That is a fragile basis for the paper's main quantitative claim. (3) The 1D SBE uses a fixed dephasing T2=484 as and a k.p extrapolation of the Gamma-point TDM to the whole Brillouin zone; these are reasonable but unvalidated, so the mechanism is plausible rather than proven.

Bottom line: this paper will interest people working on solid-state HHG and attosecond source design, and it deserves a serious referee. But it should not pass as-is. I would recommend sending it to review, with expectations of major revision: the filter sensitivity needs to be shown, and the causal language needs to be toned down to match what the equations actually support.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript studies the temporal structure of attosecond pulse trains (APTs) from high-order harmonic generation (HHG) in bulk silicon using real-time time-dependent density functional theory (rt-TDDFT), supported by an analytical expression for APT emission decomposed in an adiabatic basis and a one-dimensional semiconductor Bloch equation (SBE) validation. The authors report that as laser intensity increases, the maximum emission peak shifts later and the FWHM of the low-pass-filtered APT varies nonmonotonically (Fig. 1(d,e)). They attribute this to symmetry-forbidden interband transitions (transition dipole moment between VBM and CBM+3 existing only at the Gamma point) causing delayed 'anomalous interband' recombination, and argue that electron occupation in different energy bands characterizes APT timing. The paper claims this establishes a fundamental time-domain constraint for solid-state attosecond sources.

Significance. Understanding the temporal profile of solid-state HHG is important for attosecond pulse synthesis, and the paper identifies a concrete mechanism—symmetry-restricted recombination at the Gamma point—that could explain intensity-dependent pulse broadening. The rt-TDDFT calculations reproduce the main features of experimental HHG spectra of silicon (Fig. 2), lending credibility to the numerical setup. The analytical APT expression is explicitly shown to reduce to a known result of Ref. [25] (Appendix C, Eq. (10)), which is a useful consistency check. However, the paper's central causal claim is not established by its own derivation: the diagonal-density approximation in Appendix C drops interband coherences, and the SBE emission is coherence-mediated, so occupation is at best correlated with, not a driver of, emission timing. No code or data availability statement is provided, so reproducibility rests primarily on the standard nature of the methods.

major comments (3)

[Appendix C, Eqs. (11)-(13)] The derivation of the central occupation-resolved APT expression (Eq. (12)) assumes the time-dependent density can be written as n(r,t) = sum_{l,k} O_{l,k}(t) |phi_{l,k}(t)|^2, dropping all off-diagonal density-matrix elements in the adiabatic basis. Under this diagonal approximation the APT expression contains only band-diagonal matrix elements of the ionic potential gradient plus the N_e E(t) term; it is an intraband-only expression and cannot represent interband recombination emission. This matters because the delayed anomalous interband emission, which is the paper's explanation for the FWHM broadening, is a coherence (off-diagonal) contribution: in the SBE validation in Appendix E the emission is P(t) = sum mu p (Eq. (19)), with p the interband coherence, not the occupation. The analytic derivation therefore does not support the abstract's claim that APT temporal structure is 'characterized by occupation' or that emission is occupation-driven. At best, the equations show occupation and emission are correlated; the causal arrow in the title is not established by the paper's own formalism.
[Section III.B and Appendix B (Fig. 1(d,e))] The central nonmonotonic FWHM-versus-intensity trend and the peak-center shift are obtained by low-pass filtering all signals with a single cutoff energy chosen from the lowest-intensity signal (4.3 eV) and then tracking only the maximum peak. The manuscript reports no sensitivity analysis with respect to the filter cutoff, no uncertainty estimates (e.g., from the k-point sampling or the pulse envelope), and no discussion of how many peaks exist in the filtered signal at each intensity. Since the quantitative claim of the paper rests on this post-processing, the robustness of the nonmonotonic trend to the cutoff choice and to the peak-selection criterion must be demonstrated before the conclusion can be accepted.
[Appendix E, Eqs. (14)-(19)] The 1D SBE validation extends the equilibrium transition dipole moment between VBM and CBM+3, which is nonzero only at the Gamma point, to the entire 1D Brillouin zone using k.p perturbation theory, and employs a single dephasing time T2 = 484 as. The k-dependence of this TDM is precisely what controls whether the anomalous recombination is delayed; if the k.p extension artificially suppresses the off-Gamma TDM, the SBE reproduces the occupation delay by construction. An independent check is needed, for example by comparing SBE occupations directly with the 3D TDDFT band-resolved occupations at matched parameters, or by varying T2 and showing the delay is robust.

minor comments (6)

[Abstract] The sentence 'The mechanism underlying high harmonic generation (HHG) in gases has been well clarified, characterizing attosecond pulse trains (APT) in the time domain, significantly advances the synthesis of isolated attosecond pulse (IAP)' is grammatically broken and should be rewritten.
[Figure 3 caption] The caption refers to panels (c), (d) and (e) where the figure appears to contain six panels (a)-(f); the main text also refers to 'Figure 3 (d), (e)' for chirp panels. Please correct the cross-references.
[Figure 4 caption] The caption lists panels (a), (c), (e) for the low-intensity case but the text refers to (c), (e), (g); please unify the panel numbering.
[Section IV.A] The phrase 'only can the anomalous temporal phenomenon be controlled by the first term of equation (8)' is unclear: the first term is an occupation-weighted potential integral, not a quantity that is 'controlled by' occupation. Please rephrase to state that the first term depends on occupation.
[References] Reference [66] is cited in Section III.B but the reference list contains only 60 entries; either add the missing reference or remove the citation.
[Throughout] There are numerous typos and grammatical issues, e.g., 'diffierent' in the Figure 3 caption, 'preform' in Appendix E, 'can could' in Section IV.A, and 'obstacles IAP separation' in the Abstract. A thorough language edit is needed.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The central occupation-driven claim is built into the diagonal-density approximation: Eq. 12 excludes the interband coherences that are the actual emission source.

self definitional [Appendix C, Eqs. (11)-(12); main-text Eq. (8), Section IV.A]
"n(r,t)=Σ_i n_i(r,t)=...=Σ_{l,k} O_{ππ(l,k)}^{(e)}(t) ∙ φ_{l,k}^{(e)*}(t)φ_{l,k}^{(e)}(t) ... APT(t) ∝ |∫Ω d^3r [Σ_{l,k} O_{ππ(l,k)}^{(e)}(t) ∙ φ_{l,k}^{(e)*}(t)φ_{l,k}^{(e)}(t)] ∙ ∇v_ion(r) + N_e E(t)|^2"

The derivation replaces the full time-dependent density by its band-diagonal part in the adiabatic basis, dropping all off-diagonal (interband coherence) terms. The resulting APT formula contains only occupations O_{l,k}(t), so the paper's conclusion that 'the time evolution of APT ... is profoundly affected by the temporal occupation distribution' is true by construction of the approximation. The claimed delayed 'anomalous interband' emission is an off-diagonal coherence effect; Appendix E's own emission formula P(t)=Σ μ_k^{λλ'} p_k^{λλ'}(t) shows emission is sourced by the interband polarization p, not by the occupation. Thus the central occupation-driven causal claim is not independently derived: it is equivalent to the diagonal input inserted in Eq. (11).

full rationale

The paper's TDDFT calculations and experimental comparison are independent content, and the main analytic expression before the occupation expansion is explicitly acknowledged to equal ref. [25], an external result; no load-bearing self-citation chain is present. However, the paper's headline advance—that APT temporal structure is 'occupation-driven'—is obtained by expanding n(r,t) and keeping only diagonal terms (Eq. 11). Under that approximation the APT formula is occupation-only by construction, so the abstract's 'occupation-resolved theory' does not prove that occupation controls emission timing; it defines an occupation-only proxy. The actual interband recombination invoked for the delayed anomalous emission is described by the off-diagonal coherence p in the SBE (Eq. 19), and occupations evolve only through coupling to p (Eqs. 17–18). The SBE 'validation' also imports the k-dependent TDM from the same DFT package, so it is a consistency check rather than an independent test. These issues make the central derivation partially circular, but the FWHM nonmonotonicity and TDM selectivity remain real ab initio observations, so the score is moderate rather than maximal.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard TDDFT and SBE approximations plus one interpretive premise about TDM localization at the Gamma point. The only fitted numerical parameters are the SBE dephasing time and the low-pass filter cutoff used for FWHM extraction. No new physical entities such as particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (2)

low-pass filter cutoff = 4.3 eV
Chosen as the upper limit of the lowest intensity signal (Appendix B); determines which peak and FWHM are measured, so the nonmonotonic trend depends on this choice.
SBE dephasing time T2 = 484 as
Used in the 1D SBE validation (Appendix E); a phenomenological constant, not derived or measured, and it affects the reproduced occupation delay.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption Dipole approximation for the laser field
Used in Eq. 1 and throughout; neglects spatial variation of the vector potential over the simulation cell, which is standard for the intensities considered.
domain assumption Adiabatic eigenstate basis expansion of the TDDFT wavefunction
Used in Eq. 11 to define time-dependent occupations; assumes the adiabatic basis follows the field and that non-adiabatic population transfer is captured only by the occupation coefficients.
domain assumption Hartree and exchange-correlation forces cancel as internal forces in the total current acceleration
Appendix C, after Eq. 8; standard for total dipole acceleration, but less obviously valid for the band-resolved decomposition that the paper's interpretation relies on.
domain assumption Interband emission is dominated by vertical transitions at the same k, with recombination allowed only where TDM is nonzero
Used to interpret TDM(VBM,CBM+3) localized at Gamma as delayed recombination; this is the load-bearing premise for the anomalous interband mechanism.
domain assumption Neglect of dephasing, carrier lifetime, excitonic effects, spin, nuclear motion, and propagation
Explicitly stated in Methods and Appendix A; standard for this class of TDDFT studies but directly affects quantitative FWHM values and the generality of the constraint.
domain assumption PBE DFT bandgap underestimation does not affect the conclusions
Asserted in Appendix A without a benchmark against a corrected band structure; could alter the ordering and participation of conduction bands at high intensity.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Occupation-Driven emission asynchronous as a Fundamental Constraint on Solid-State Attosecond Pulses." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NDWBWMCU

@misc{pith2026250718019,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Occupation-Driven emission asynchronous as a Fundamental Constraint on Solid-State Attosecond Pulses},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NDWBWMCU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.18019}
}

read the original abstract

A newly analytic occupation-resolved theory capturing the temporal structure of attosecond pulses (APs) is derived. We validate it with real-time time-dependent density functional theory and show remarkable temporal confinement of APs with laser intensity in solid state. Using a simplified field-driven electron excitation together with a generalized pre-acceleration picture, the interband emission timing demonstrate intrinsically temporal mismatched with field-synchronous intraband radiation, leading to a nonmonotonic dependence of attosecond pulse width on laser intensity. Our findings not only shed light on the microscopic mechanisms behind solid-state high harmonic generation (HHG), but also establish the fundamental time-domain constraint on solid-state APs independent of material damage thresholds.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages

[25]

Ikemachi, Y

T. Ikemachi, Y . Shinohara, T. Sato, J. Yumoto, M. Kuwata- Gonokami, and K. L. Ishikawa, Trajectory analysis of high-order-harmonic generation from periodic crystals, Physical Review A 95, 4 (2017)

work page 2017
[1]

𝟒𝟒𝟎𝟎 𝑻𝑻𝑻𝑻 𝒄𝒄𝒄𝒄𝟐𝟐⁄ and 𝟏𝟏

𝟏𝟏𝟎𝟎 𝑻𝑻𝑻𝑻 𝒄𝒄𝒄𝒄𝟐𝟐⁄ , 𝟎𝟎. 𝟒𝟒𝟎𝟎 𝑻𝑻𝑻𝑻 𝒄𝒄𝒄𝒄𝟐𝟐⁄ and 𝟏𝟏. 𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝑻𝑻𝑻𝑻 𝒄𝒄𝒄𝒄𝟐𝟐⁄ , respectively. (c), (d) and (e) show the corresponding time - frequency analysis. To investigate the role of multi-band on the characteristic of APT emission, we pick three standard sets of progressively increasing laser intensities to compare the involvement of additional energy bands, ...

work page
[2]

𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝑻𝑻𝑻𝑻 𝒄𝒄𝒄𝒄𝟐𝟐⁄

𝟏𝟏𝟎𝟎 𝑻𝑻𝑻𝑻 𝒄𝒄𝒄𝒄𝟐𝟐⁄ , while panels (d), (f), (h) represent the corresponding cases of 𝟏𝟏. 𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝑻𝑻𝑻𝑻 𝒄𝒄𝒄𝒄𝟐𝟐⁄ . B. Transition dipole moment guided by symmetry. The anomalous variations observed between different multiband transition sparked our interest. To uncover the underlying mechanisms, we analyze the differences in transition dipole element (TDM) betwee...

work page
[3]

P . M. Paul, E. S. Toma, P . Breger, G. Mullot, F. Augé, Ph. Balcou, H. G. Muller, and P . Agostini, Observation of a Train of Attosecond Pulses from High Harmonic Generation, Science 292 , 1689 (2001)

work page 2001
[4]

Krausz and M

F. Krausz and M. I. Stockman, Attosecond metrology: from electron capture to future signal processing, Nature Photon 8, 205 (2014). 22 / 26

work page 2014
[5]

Dudovich, O

N. Dudovich, O. Smirnova, J. Levesque, Y . Mairesse, M. Y . Ivanov, D. M. Villeneuve, and P . B. Corkum, Measuring and controlling the birth of attosecond XUV pulses, Nature Phys 2, 781 (2006)

work page 2006
[6]

P . B. Corkum, Plasma perspective on strong field multiphoton ionization, Physical Review Letters 71, 13 (1993)

work page 1993
[7]

Lewenstein, P

M. Lewenstein, P . Balcou, M. Y . Ivanov, A. L’Huillier, and P . B. Corkum, Theory of high - harmonic generation by low-frequency laser fields, Physical Review A 49, 3 (1994)

work page 1994

Show all 62 references

[8]

Castelvecchi and K

D. Castelvecchi and K. Sanderson, Physicists who built ultrafast ‘attosecond’ lasers win Nobel Prize, Nature 622, 225 (2023)

2023
[9]

Ferray, A

M. Ferray, A. L’Huillier, X. F. Li, L. A. Lompre, G. Mainfray, and C. Manus, Multiple-harmonic conversion of 1064 nm radiation in rare gases, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 21, L31 (1988)

1988
[10]

Ghimire, A

S. Ghimire, A. D. DiChiara, E. Sistrunk, P . Agostini, L. F. DiMauro, and D. A. Reis, Observation of high-order harmonic generation in a bulk crystal, Nature Physics 7, 138 (2011)

2011
[11]

Hohenleutner, F

M. Hohenleutner, F. Langer, O. Schubert, M. Knorr, U. Huttner, S. W. Koch, M. Kira, and R. Huber, Real-time observation of interfering crystal electrons in high -harmonic generation, Nature 523, 7562 (2015)

2015
[12]

Vampa, T

G. Vampa, T. J. Hammond, N. Thir’e, B. E. Schmidt, F. L’egar’e, D. D. Klug, and P . B. Corkum, Generation of high harmonics from silicon, arXiv: Optics (2016)

2016
[13]

Ndabashimiye, S

G. Ndabashimiye, S. Ghimire, M. Wu, D. A. Browne, K. J. Schafer, M. B. Gaarde, and D. A. Reis, Solid-state harmonics beyond the atomic limit, Nature 534, 520 (2016)

2016
[14]

M. Garg, M. Zhan, T. T. Luu, H. Lakhotia, T. Klostermann, A. Guggenmos, and E. Goulielmakis, Multi-petahertz electronic metrology, Nature 538, 7625 (2016)

2016
[15]

Y . S. You, David, and S. Ghimire, Anisotropic high-harmonic generation in bulk crystals, Nat Phys 13, 4 (2017)

2017
[16]

Murakami, M

Y . Murakami, M. Eckstein, and P . Werner, High-Harmonic Generation in Mott Insulators, Physical Review Letters 121, 5 (2018)

2018
[17]

Tancogne -Dejean and A

N. Tancogne -Dejean and A. Rubio, Atomic -like high -harmonic generation from two - 23 / 26 dimensional materials, Sci Adv 4, 2 (2018)

2018
[18]

Ghimire and D

S. Ghimire and D. A. Reis, High-harmonic generation from solids, Nature Physics 15, 1 (2019)

2019
[19]

Goulielmakis and T

E. Goulielmakis and T. Brabec, High harmonic generation in condensed matter, Nature Photonics 16, 6 (2022)

2022
[20]

J. Park, A. Subramani, S. Kim, and M. F. Ciappina, Recent trends in high -order harmonic generation in solids, Advances in Physics: X 7, 1 (2022)

2022
[21]

T. T. Luu, M. Garg, S. Y . Kruchinin, A. Moulet, M. T. Hassan, and E. Goulielmakis, Extreme ultraviolet high-harmonic spectroscopy of solids, Nature 521, 7553 (2015)

2015
[22]

Vampa, C

G. Vampa, C. R. McDonald, G. Orlando, D. D. Klug, P . B. Corkum, and T. Brabec, Theoretical Analysis of High-Harmonic Generation in Solids, Physical Review Letters 113, 7 (2014)

2014
[23]

Vampa, T

G. Vampa, T. J. Hammond, N. Thiré, B. E. Schmidt, F. Légaré, C. R. McDonald, T. Brabec, and P . B. Corkum, Linking high harmonics from gases and solids, Nature 522, 7557 (2015)

2015
[24]

Y . W. Kim, T.-J. Shao, H. Kim, S. Han, S. Kim, M. Ciappina, X. -B. Bian, and S.-W. Kim, Spectral Interference in High Harmonic Generation from Solids, ACS Photonics 6, 4 (2019)

2019
[26]

A. J. Uzan et al., Attosecond spectral singularities in solid -state high-harmonic generation, Nat. Photonics 14, 3 (2020)

2020
[27]

Tancogne-Dejean, O

N. Tancogne-Dejean, O. D. Mucke, F. X. Kartner, and A. Rubio, Impact of the Electronic Band Structure in High-Harmonic Generation Spectra of Solids, Phys Rev Lett 118, 8 (2017)

2017
[28]

Orenstein, A

G. Orenstein, A. J. Uzan, S. Gadasi, T. Arusi-Parpar, M. Krüger, R. Cireasa, B. D. Bruner, and N. Dudovich, Shaping electron-hole trajectories for solid-state high harmonic generation control, Opt. Express, OE 27, 37835 (2019)

2019
[29]

Nourbakhsh, N

Z. Nourbakhsh, N. Tancogne-Dejean, H. Merdji, and A. Rubio, High Harmonics and Isolated Attosecond Pulses from MgO, Physical Review Applied 15, 1 (2021). 24 / 26

2021
[30]

C. R. McDonald, G. Vampa, P . B. Corkum, and T. Brabec, Interband Bloch oscillation mechanism for high-harmonic generation in semiconductor crystals, Physical Review A 92, 3 (2015)

2015
[31]

Vampa, C

G. Vampa, C. R. McDonald, G. Orlando, P . B. Corkum, and T. Brabec, Semiclassical analysis of high harmonic generation in bulk crystals, Phys Rev B 91, 6 (2015)

2015
[32]

M. Wu, S. Ghimire, D. A. Reis, K. J. Schafer, and M. B. Gaarde, High -harmonic generation from Bloch electrons in solids, Physical Review A 91, 4 (2015)

2015
[33]

Yue and M

L. Yue and M. B. Gaarde, Imperfect Recollisions in High-Harmonic Generation in Solids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 153204 (2020)

2020
[34]

L. Li, P . Lan, X. Zhu, T. Huang, Q. Zhang, M. Lein, and P . Lu, Reciprocal- Space-Trajectory Perspective on High-Harmonic Generation in Solids, Physical Review Letters 122, 19 (2019)

2019
[35]

C. Yu, S. Jiang, T. Wu, G. Yuan, Z. Wang, C. Jin, and R. Lu, Two-dimensional imaging of energy bands from crystal orientation dependent higher-order harmonic spectra in h -BN, Phys Rev B 98, 8 (2018)

2018
[36]

Yue et al., Signatures of Multiband Effects in High -Harmonic Generation in Monolayer MoS2, Physical Review Letters 129, 14 (2022)

L. Yue et al., Signatures of Multiband Effects in High -Harmonic Generation in Monolayer MoS2, Physical Review Letters 129, 14 (2022)

2022
[37]

Wang, S.-S

Z. Wang, S.-S. Li, and L. -W. Wang, Efficient Real-Time Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory Method and its Application to a Collision of an Ion with a 2D Material, Physical Review Letters 114, 6 (2015)

2015
[38]

Neufeld, N

O. Neufeld, N. Tancogne-Dejean, U. De Giovannini, H. Hubener, and A. Rubio, Light -Driven Extremely Nonlinear Bulk Photogalvanic Currents, Phys Rev Lett 127, 12 (2021)

2021
[39]

G. R. Lee, R. Gommers, F. Waselewski, K. Wohlfahrt, and A. O’Leary, PyWavelets: A Python package for wavelet analysis, Journal of Open Source Software 4, 1237 (2019)

2019
[40]

Chini, K

M. Chini, K. Zhao, and Z. Chang, The generation, characterization and applications of broadband isolated attosecond pulses, Nature Photonics 8, 3 (2014)

2014
[41]

Tancogne-Dejean, O

N. Tancogne-Dejean, O. D. Mücke, F. X. Kärtner, and A. Rubio, Ellipticity dependence of high- harmonic generation in solids originating from coupled intraband and interband dynamics, Nature 25 / 26 Communications 8, 1 (2017)

2017
[42]

Suthar, F

P . Suthar, F. Trojánek, P . Malý, T. J.-Y . Derrien, and M. Kozák, Role of Van Hove singularities and effective mass anisotropy in polarization -resolved high harmonic spectroscopy of silicon, Commun Phys 5, 1 (2022)

2022
[43]

Floss, C

I. Floss, C. Lemell, G. Wachter, V. Smejkal, S. A. Sato, X.-M. Tong, K. Yabana, and J. Burgdörfer, Ab initio multiscale simulation of high-order harmonicgeneration in solids, Phys Rev A 97, 1 (2018)

2018
[44]

Jiang, J

S. Jiang, J. Chen, H. Wei, C. Yu, R. Lu, and C. D. Lin, Role of the Transition Dipole Amplitude and Phase on the Generation of Odd and Even High-Order Harmonics in Crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 253201 (2018)

2018
[45]

J. Lu, E. F. Cunningham, Y . S. You, D. A. Reis, and S. Ghimire, Interferometry of dipole phase in high harmonics from solids, Nature Photon 13, 2 (2019)

2019
[46]

Li et al., Dynamic Core Polarization in High Harmonic Generation from Solids: The Example of MgO Crystals, Physical Review Letters 126, 18 (2021)

L. Li et al., Dynamic Core Polarization in High Harmonic Generation from Solids: The Example of MgO Crystals, Physical Review Letters 126, 18 (2021)

2021
[47]

Neufeld, J

O. Neufeld, J. Zhang, U. De Giovannini, H. Hübener, and A. Rubio, Probing phonon dynamics with multidimensional high harmonic carrier -envelope-phase spectroscopy, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119, e2204219119 (2022)

2022
[48]

H. L. Xiao -Shuang Kong1, Symmetry analyses of high -order harmonicgeneration in monolayer hexagonal boronnitride, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics (2021)

2021
[49]

G. P . Zhang, M. S. Si, M. Murakami, Y . H. Bai, and T. F. George, Generating high-order optical and spin harmonics from ferromagnetic monolayers, Nat Commun 9, 3031 (2018)

2018
[50]

M. S. Mrudul, N. Tancogne-Dejean, A. Rubio, and G. Dixit, High -harmonic generation from spin-polarised defects in solids, Npj Computational Materials 6, 1 (2020)

2020
[51]

Mondal, O

A. Mondal, O. Neufeld, Z. Yin, Z. Nourbakhsh, V. Svoboda, A. Rubio, N. Tancogne -Dejean, and H. J. Wörner, High-harmonic spectroscopy of low-energy electron-scattering dynamics in liquids, Nat. Phys. 1 (2023). 26 / 26

2023
[52]

V. E. Nefedova et al., Enhanced extreme ultraviolet high -harmonic generation from chromium-doped magnesium oxide, Applied Physics Letters 118, 20 (2021)

2021
[53]

Zhang, W

Y . Zhang, W. He, L. Li, H. Cui, S. Qiao, P . Lan, and P . Lu, Role of localized electronic states in high-order harmonic generation from doped semiconductors, Phys. Rev. B 109, 165204 (2024)

2024
[54]

C. Yu, K. K. Hansen, and L. B. Madsen, Enhanced high-order harmonic generation in donor- doped band-gap materials, Phys Rev A 99, 1 (2019)

2019
[55]

L. V. Keldysh, Ionization in the field of a strong electromagnetic wave, Sov. Phys. JETP 20 , 1307 (1965)

1965
[56]

Balling and J

P . Balling and J. Schou, Femtosecond -laser ablation dynamics of dielectrics: basics and applications for thin films, Rep. Prog. Phys. 76, 036502 (2013)

2013
[57]

W. Jia, Z. Cao, L. Wang, J. Fu, X. Chi, W. Gao, and L. -W. Wang, The analysis of a plane wave pseudopotential density functional theory code on a GPU machine, Computer Physics Communications 184, 9 (2013)

2013
[58]

D. R. Hamann, Optimized norm -conserving Vanderbilt pseudopotentials, Phys. Rev. B 88, 085117 (2013)

2013
[59]

J. P . Perdew and A. Zunger, Self-interaction correction to density-functional approximations for many-electron systems, Phys. Rev. B 23, 5048 (1981)

1981
[60]

Onida, L

G. Onida, L. Reining, and A. Rubio, Electronic excitations: density -functional versus many- body Green’s-function approaches, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 601 (2002)

2002
[61]

C. Yu, X. Zhang, S. Jiang, X. Cao, G. Yuan, T. Wu, L. Bai, and R. Lu, Dependence of high-order- harmonic generation on dipole moment in SiO2 crystals, Physical Review A 94, 1 (2016)

2016
[62]

Langer et al., Lightwave -driven quasiparticle collisions on a subcycle timescale, Nature 533, 7602 (2016)

F. Langer et al., Lightwave -driven quasiparticle collisions on a subcycle timescale, Nature 533, 7602 (2016)

2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [25]

Ikemachi, Y

T. Ikemachi, Y . Shinohara, T. Sato, J. Yumoto, M. Kuwata- Gonokami, and K. L. Ishikawa, Trajectory analysis of high-order-harmonic generation from periodic crystals, Physical Review A 95, 4 (2017)

work page 2017

[2] [1]

𝟒𝟒𝟎𝟎 𝑻𝑻𝑻𝑻 𝒄𝒄𝒄𝒄𝟐𝟐⁄ and 𝟏𝟏

𝟏𝟏𝟎𝟎 𝑻𝑻𝑻𝑻 𝒄𝒄𝒄𝒄𝟐𝟐⁄ , 𝟎𝟎. 𝟒𝟒𝟎𝟎 𝑻𝑻𝑻𝑻 𝒄𝒄𝒄𝒄𝟐𝟐⁄ and 𝟏𝟏. 𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝑻𝑻𝑻𝑻 𝒄𝒄𝒄𝒄𝟐𝟐⁄ , respectively. (c), (d) and (e) show the corresponding time - frequency analysis. To investigate the role of multi-band on the characteristic of APT emission, we pick three standard sets of progressively increasing laser intensities to compare the involvement of additional energy bands, ...

work page

[3] [2]

𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝑻𝑻𝑻𝑻 𝒄𝒄𝒄𝒄𝟐𝟐⁄

𝟏𝟏𝟎𝟎 𝑻𝑻𝑻𝑻 𝒄𝒄𝒄𝒄𝟐𝟐⁄ , while panels (d), (f), (h) represent the corresponding cases of 𝟏𝟏. 𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝑻𝑻𝑻𝑻 𝒄𝒄𝒄𝒄𝟐𝟐⁄ . B. Transition dipole moment guided by symmetry. The anomalous variations observed between different multiband transition sparked our interest. To uncover the underlying mechanisms, we analyze the differences in transition dipole element (TDM) betwee...

work page

[4] [3]

P . M. Paul, E. S. Toma, P . Breger, G. Mullot, F. Augé, Ph. Balcou, H. G. Muller, and P . Agostini, Observation of a Train of Attosecond Pulses from High Harmonic Generation, Science 292 , 1689 (2001)

work page 2001

[5] [4]

Krausz and M

F. Krausz and M. I. Stockman, Attosecond metrology: from electron capture to future signal processing, Nature Photon 8, 205 (2014). 22 / 26

work page 2014

[6] [5]

Dudovich, O

N. Dudovich, O. Smirnova, J. Levesque, Y . Mairesse, M. Y . Ivanov, D. M. Villeneuve, and P . B. Corkum, Measuring and controlling the birth of attosecond XUV pulses, Nature Phys 2, 781 (2006)

work page 2006

[7] [6]

P . B. Corkum, Plasma perspective on strong field multiphoton ionization, Physical Review Letters 71, 13 (1993)

work page 1993

[8] [7]

Lewenstein, P

M. Lewenstein, P . Balcou, M. Y . Ivanov, A. L’Huillier, and P . B. Corkum, Theory of high - harmonic generation by low-frequency laser fields, Physical Review A 49, 3 (1994)

work page 1994