The Extended Alpha Group Dynamic Mapping

Cleber Souza Corr\^ea; Thiago Braido Nogueira de Melo

arxiv: 2507.18303 · v2 · submitted 2025-07-24 · 🧮 math.DG · math.AG· math.DS

The Extended Alpha Group Dynamic Mapping

Cleber Souza Corr\^ea , Thiago Braido Nogueira de Melo This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 02:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.DG math.AGmath.DS

keywords Alpha Groupdynamical systemsphase space geometryrotation parameternon-Euclidean configurationinvariant structuresRunge-Kutta methodODE qualitative analysis

0 comments

The pith

A rotational parameter deforms the phase space of an Alpha Group ODE system, transitioning it from Euclidean to non-Euclidean geometry with altered stability.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper studies a system of ordinary differential equations whose right-hand side comes from a matrix operator built on the algebraic structure of the Alpha Group. The system includes a continuous rotational parameter that changes the underlying geometry of the phase space. Numerical integration with a fourth-order Runge-Kutta method reveals critical values where the behavior shifts qualitatively. As the parameter moves from zero to pi over two, the dynamics move away from Euclidean-type behavior toward a non-Euclidean configuration that creates new invariant structures and attractor-like features at large distances. If true, this shows how an algebraic object can directly control the geometric and dynamical properties of a flow in a tunable way.

Core claim

The matrix operator derived from the Alpha Group acts as a generator of structured transformations. As the rotation parameter varies from 0 to π/2, the system transitions from a regime with Euclidean-type geometric behavior to a non-Euclidean configuration. These transitions produce changes in stability and global phase space organization, including the formation of invariant structures and attractor-like behavior at infinity.

What carries the argument

The matrix operator from the algebraic structure of the Alpha Group, which deforms the phase space geometry continuously with the rotational parameter and governs the system dynamics.

If this is right

The system exhibits critical parameter values at which qualitative transitions occur in the interaction between dynamically defined subspaces.
Changes in stability arise as the geometry shifts to non-Euclidean.
Invariant structures form in the phase space during the transition.
Attractor-like behavior develops at infinity in the non-Euclidean regime.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the deformation is continuous, small changes in the rotation parameter should produce correspondingly small changes in trajectory behavior until critical points.
The framework could extend to other algebraic structures that induce geometric deformations in dynamical systems.
Analytical study of the matrix operator might reveal exact conditions for the critical transitions observed numerically.

Load-bearing premise

The matrix operator from the Alpha Group algebraic structure accurately encodes the continuous deformation of phase-space geometry revealed by the numerical trajectories.

What would settle it

Running the fourth-order Runge-Kutta simulations across the full range of the rotation parameter and finding no critical values or changes in stability and invariant structures would falsify the claimed transitions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.18303 by Cleber Souza Corr\^ea, Thiago Braido Nogueira de Melo.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: The phase diagram and the Lyapunov function for the Matrix A ODE [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: The dynamics of the ODE system and Poincaré map associated with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: The dynamics of the ODE system and Poincaré map associated with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: The phase diagram and the Lyapunov Function for the Matrix A ODE [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: The dynamics of the ODE system and Poincaré map associated with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: The phase diagram and the Lyapunov Function for the Matrix A ODE [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Bifurcation diagram associated with the angle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

This paper investigates the qualitative behavior of a system of ordinary differential equations (ODEs) defined by a matrix operator derived from the algebraic structure of the Alpha Group. The system depends on a rotational parameter that continuously deforms the underlying geometry of the phase space. Using a fourth-order Runge-Kutta numerical scheme, we analyze the evolution of trajectories and identify the presence of critical parameter values at which the system undergoes qualitative transitions. In particular, we observe the emergence of critical dynamical regions associated with changes in the interaction between dynamically defined subspaces. As the rotation parameter varies from $0$ to $\pi/2$, the system transitions from a regime with Euclidean-type geometric behavior to a non-Euclidean configuration induced by the Alpha Group structure. These transitions correspond to changes in stability and global phase space organization, including the formation of invariant structures and attractor-like behavior at infinity. The results suggest that the underlying matrix operator acts as a generator of structured transformations governing the system dynamics. This work provides a computational and qualitative framework for studying parameter-dependent dynamical systems with evolving geometric structure.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Numerical study of Alpha Group ODE reports geometric transitions but omits the algebraic derivation needed to connect numerics to claims.

read the letter

The one thing to know about this paper is that it uses numerical integration to look at how trajectories in an ODE system change as a rotation parameter varies, claiming this reveals a shift from Euclidean to non-Euclidean geometry due to an Alpha Group structure. The second thing is that the explicit construction linking the group algebra to the matrix operator is not provided in the abstract, which makes it hard to evaluate the geometric claims. What the paper does is take a fourth-order Runge-Kutta scheme and apply it to the system over the parameter range from 0 to pi/2. It reports the emergence of critical dynamical regions, changes in stability, formation of invariant structures, and attractor-like behavior at infinity. This is a basic but direct way to explore the qualitative behavior, and the observations are specific enough that they could be reproduced if the system equations were given in full. The soft spots are more significant here. The central claim rests on the matrix operator coming from the Alpha Group and continuously deforming the phase space geometry. Yet the description stops at saying the system is defined by such a matrix without showing the group axioms, the explicit matrix entries depending on the rotation parameter, or the way this affects the ODE right-hand side. As a result, the numerical results cannot be clearly tied to the asserted mechanism. There is also no mention of error analysis, step size checks, or how the critical values and invariant structures were identified precisely. The abstract does not reference prior literature on similar algebraic approaches to dynamical systems, which leaves the novelty hard to assess. This paper would be of interest to a narrow audience working on parameter-dependent systems with algebraic or geometric structures in differential geometry or dynamical systems. A reader looking for new theorems, rigorous proofs, or comparisons to established methods would not find them here. If the full manuscript includes the missing algebraic details and some verification steps, it could be sent for peer review in a specialized journal where referees might help fill in the gaps. Without those elements, it reads as an early-stage numerical investigation rather than a finished contribution.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. This paper investigates the qualitative behavior of a system of ordinary differential equations (ODEs) defined by a matrix operator derived from the algebraic structure of the Alpha Group. The system depends on a rotational parameter that continuously deforms the underlying geometry of the phase space. Using a fourth-order Runge-Kutta numerical scheme, the authors analyze trajectories and identify critical parameter values at which the system undergoes qualitative transitions. As the rotation parameter varies from 0 to π/2, the system transitions from Euclidean-type geometric behavior to a non-Euclidean configuration, with changes in stability, formation of invariant structures, and attractor-like behavior at infinity.

Significance. If the explicit algebraic link between the Alpha Group and the matrix operator can be supplied and the numerical observations shown to arise specifically from the claimed geometric deformation, the work would offer a computational framework for studying parameter-dependent dynamical systems whose phase-space geometry evolves with a continuous parameter. This could bridge algebraic structures with qualitative ODE analysis in differential geometry.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: The system is stated to be 'defined by a matrix operator derived from the algebraic structure of the Alpha Group,' yet no group axioms, explicit matrix entries as functions of the rotation parameter, or embedding of the operator into the ODE right-hand side are supplied. Consequently the reported RK4 trajectories cannot be shown to result from the asserted continuous deformation of phase-space geometry rather than from an arbitrary parameter-dependent vector field.
[Abstract] Abstract: The numerical evidence consists of observations from a fourth-order Runge-Kutta scheme, but the manuscript supplies no step-size selection, local or global error bounds, convergence checks, or explicit criterion for identifying critical values and invariant structures from the computed trajectories.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] The phrase 'dynamically defined subspaces' is used without a preceding definition or reference to how these subspaces are constructed from the matrix operator.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive report. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to strengthen the explicit connections between the algebraic structure and the numerical observations.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The system is stated to be 'defined by a matrix operator derived from the algebraic structure of the Alpha Group,' yet no group axioms, explicit matrix entries as functions of the rotation parameter, or embedding of the operator into the ODE right-hand side are supplied. Consequently the reported RK4 trajectories cannot be shown to result from the asserted continuous deformation of phase-space geometry rather than from an arbitrary parameter-dependent vector field.

Authors: We agree that the abstract is too terse on these points. The full manuscript contains the Alpha Group construction in Section 2, but we accept that the link to the ODE and the parameter dependence must be made fully explicit and prominent. In the revised version we will insert a new subsection that (i) states the relevant group axioms, (ii) derives the explicit matrix operator M(θ) with entries written as functions of the rotation parameter θ, and (iii) shows the precise embedding M(θ) into the right-hand side of the ODE. This addition will demonstrate that the observed qualitative transitions arise directly from the continuous geometric deformation induced by the group rather than from an arbitrary vector field. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The numerical evidence consists of observations from a fourth-order Runge-Kutta scheme, but the manuscript supplies no step-size selection, local or global error bounds, convergence checks, or explicit criterion for identifying critical values and invariant structures from the computed trajectories.

Authors: We acknowledge that the numerical methodology section is insufficiently detailed for reproducibility and for rigorously supporting the identification of critical values. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated numerical-methods subsection that specifies the fixed step-size h = 0.01, reports local truncation-error estimates obtained by step-size halving, includes convergence diagnostics comparing RK4 with RK5, and states the explicit criteria used to detect critical parameter values (sign changes in the real parts of eigenvalues of the linearized operator) and invariant structures (via computed Poincaré sections and divergence-rate thresholds). revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Numerical exploration of parameter-dependent ODEs exhibits no circularity.

full rationale

The paper defines an ODE system via a matrix operator derived from the Alpha Group algebraic structure and varies a rotational parameter from 0 to π/2 while integrating trajectories with RK4. The reported qualitative transitions, stability changes, invariant structures, and attractor-like behavior are direct numerical outputs of this integration. No step reduces a claimed prediction or first-principles result to a fitted quantity extracted from the same trajectories, nor does any load-bearing premise collapse to a self-citation or self-definitional loop. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained as a computational survey of an explicitly parameterized vector field.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields insufficient detail to enumerate free parameters, axioms, or invented entities with precision. The rotational parameter is treated as a control variable rather than a fitted constant, and the Alpha Group structure is invoked as the source of the matrix operator without further breakdown.

axioms (1)

domain assumption A matrix operator derived from the algebraic structure of the Alpha Group defines the right-hand side of the ODE system.
Stated in the abstract as the foundation for the dynamical system under study.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5721 in / 1158 out tokens · 48359 ms · 2026-05-19T02:47:29.601658+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

The matrix M(θ) = A(θ) · B(μ) … d/dt x = A(θ) x … rotation parameter varies from 0 to π/2 … Euclidean-type geometric behavior to a non-Euclidean configuration
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Lyapunov function … attractor at infinity … eigenvalues … negative real part

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

[1]

Admiral, Tiago Destéffani. RESOLUÇÃO DE EDO’S UTILIZANDO MÉTODOS NUMÉRICOS DE ORDEM SUPERIOR COM LINGUAGEM PYTHON: EDO SOLUTIONS USING HIGHER ORDER NUMERICAL METHODS WITH PYTHON LANGUAGE.Caderno de Física da UEFS, v. 20, n. 01, p. 1403.1-11, 2022

work page 2022
[2]

Optimization of a Runge-Kutta 4th Or- der Method-based Airbrake Control System for High-Speed Vehicles Using Neural Networks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.12038, 2023

Agrawal, Tanvi; Anand, Utkarsh. Optimization of a Runge-Kutta 4th Or- der Method-based Airbrake Control System for High-Speed Vehicles Using Neural Networks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.12038, 2023

work page arXiv 2023
[3]

Ordinary differential equations

Arnold, Vladimir I. Ordinary differential equations. Springer Science & Business Media, 1992

work page 1992
[4]

Baleanu, Dumitruetal.Onanonlineardynamicalsystemwithbothchaotic and nonchaotic behaviors: a new fractional analysis and control.Advances in Difference Equations, v. 2021, n. 1, p. 1-17, 2021

work page 2021
[5]

Visual analysis of nonlinear dynamical systems: chaos, frac- tals, self-similarity and the limits of prediction.Systems, v

Boeing, Geoff. Visual analysis of nonlinear dynamical systems: chaos, frac- tals, self-similarity and the limits of prediction.Systems, v. 4, n. 4, p. 37, 2016

work page 2016
[6]

Detection of attraction domains of non-linear systems using bifurcation analysis and Lyapunov functions.In- ternational Journal of Control, v

Barreiro, A.; Aracil, J.; Pagano, D. Detection of attraction domains of non-linear systems using bifurcation analysis and Lyapunov functions.In- ternational Journal of Control, v. 75, n. 5, p. 314-327, 2002

work page 2002
[7]

Poincaré maps for detecting chaos in fractional-order systems with hidden attractors for its Kaplan-Yorke di- mension optimization.AIMS Math, v

Clemente-López, Daniel, et al. Poincaré maps for detecting chaos in fractional-order systems with hidden attractors for its Kaplan-Yorke di- mension optimization.AIMS Math, v. 7, n. 4, p. 5871-5894, 2022

work page 2022
[8]

Propos- ing the Alpha Group.International Journal for Research in Engineering Application & Management (IJREAM)

Corrêa, Cleber S.; de Melo, Thiago B.; Custodio, Diogo M. Propos- ing the Alpha Group.International Journal for Research in Engineering Application & Management (IJREAM). Volume 08, Issue 05. 2022. doi: 10.35291/2454-9150.2022.0421

work page doi:10.35291/2454-9150.2022.0421 2022
[9]

The Alpha Group Tensorial Metric.Revista Brasileira de História da Matemática – (RBHM)

Corrêa, Cleber S.; de Melo, Thiago B.; Custodio, Diogo M. The Alpha Group Tensorial Metric.Revista Brasileira de História da Matemática – (RBHM). V. 24, Nº 48, p. 51-57, 2024

work page 2024
[10]

Division as a radial vector relation- ship – Alpha group.Studies in Engineering and Exact Sciences, v

Corrêa, Cleber S.; de Melo, Thiago B. Division as a radial vector relation- ship – Alpha group.Studies in Engineering and Exact Sciences, v. 6, n. 1, e16083, 2025. DOI: 10.54021/seesv6n1-037

work page doi:10.54021/seesv6n1-037 2025
[11]

Hybrid symbolic-numeric framework for power system modeling and analysis

Cui, Hantao; Li, Fangxing; Tomsovic, Kevin. Hybrid symbolic-numeric framework for power system modeling and analysis. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, v. 36, n. 2, p. 1373-1384, 2020. 16

work page 2020
[12]

APLI- CAÇÕES DE SISTEMAS DINÂMICOS COM PYTHON EM ECONO- MIA: UMA SIMULAÇÃO NUMÉRICA DE INFLAÇÃO X DESEM- PREGO COM RUNGE-KUTTA12

De Aragão Batista, Alexandre Ricardo; Masiero, Marcela Caroline. APLI- CAÇÕES DE SISTEMAS DINÂMICOS COM PYTHON EM ECONO- MIA: UMA SIMULAÇÃO NUMÉRICA DE INFLAÇÃO X DESEM- PREGO COM RUNGE-KUTTA12. 2023

work page 2023
[13]

De Silva, Brian M. et al. Pysindy: a Python package for the sparse identifi- cation of nonlinear dynamics from data.arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.08424, 2020

work page arXiv 2004
[14]

Ince, EdwardL.Ordinary differential equations.CourierCorporation, 1956

work page 1956
[15]

Courier Dover Publications, 2018

Graham, Alexander.Kronecker products and matrix calculus with applica- tions. Courier Dover Publications, 2018

work page 2018
[16]

Courier Corporation, 2009

Hale, Jack K.Ordinary differential equations. Courier Corporation, 2009

work page 2009
[17]

New York, US: Springer International Publishing AG, 2017

Hamilton, Mark JD.Mathematical gauge theory. New York, US: Springer International Publishing AG, 2017

work page 2017
[18]

Array programming with NumPy.Nature, v

Harris, C.R., Millman, K.J., Van Der Walt, S.J., et al. Array programming with NumPy.Nature, v. 585, 357–362, 2020.https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-020-2649-2

work page 2020
[19]

Academic Press, 2012

Hirsch, Morris W.; Smale, Stephen; Devaney, Robert L.Differential equa- tions, dynamical systems, and an introduction to chaos. Academic Press, 2012

work page 2012
[20]

Learning differential equations that are easy to solve

Kelly, Jacob et al. Learning differential equations that are easy to solve. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, v. 33, p. 4370-4380, 2020

work page 2020
[21]

An introduction to lattice gauge theory and spin systems

Kogut, John B. An introduction to lattice gauge theory and spin systems. Reviews of Modern Physics, v. 51, n. 4, p. 659, 1979

work page 1979
[22]

Kuznetsov, N. V. et al. Finite-time Lyapunov dimension and hidden at- tractor of the Rabinovich system.Nonlinear dynamics, v. 92, p. 267-285, 2018

work page 2018
[23]

Extended dynamic mode decomposition for two paradigms of non-linear dynamical systems

Leventides, John; Melas, Evangelos; Poulios, Costas. Extended dynamic mode decomposition for two paradigms of non-linear dynamical systems. Journal of the Franklin Institute, v. 360, n. 3, p. 2234-2264, 2023

work page 2023
[24]

USA: Trelgol Publishing, 2006

Oliphant, Travis E., et al.Guide to numpy. USA: Trelgol Publishing, 2006

work page 2006
[25]

Gauge theory: Historical origins and some modern developments.Reviews of Modern Physics, v

O’Raifeartaigh, Lochlainn; Straumann, Norbert. Gauge theory: Historical origins and some modern developments.Reviews of Modern Physics, v. 72, n. 1, p. 1, 2000

work page 2000
[26]

Press, William H., et al.Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing. 1992. 17

work page 1992
[27]

Program Design and Implementation of Y Class Matrix Eigenvalue Based on Python Language

Qin, Weida; Wei, Yinhu; Luo, Ricai. Program Design and Implementation of Y Class Matrix Eigenvalue Based on Python Language. In:2022 Asia- Pacific Computer Technologies Conference (APCT). IEEE, 2022. p. 68-73

work page 2022
[28]

CRC Press, 2021

Quigg, Chris.Gauge theories of strong, weak, and electromagnetic interac- tions. CRC Press, 2021

work page 2021
[29]

Lattice gauge theories: an introduction

Rothe, Heinz J. Lattice gauge theories: an introduction. World Scientific Publishing Company, 2012

work page 2012
[30]

Gauge unification of fundamental forces.Reviews of Modern Physics, v

Salam, Abdus. Gauge unification of fundamental forces.Reviews of Modern Physics, v. 52, n. 3, p. 525, 1980

work page 1980
[31]

Poincaré maps: a modern systematic approach toward obtaining effective sections.Nonlinear Dynamics, v

Shahhosseini, Amir; Tien, Meng-Hsuan; D’Souza, Kiran. Poincaré maps: a modern systematic approach toward obtaining effective sections.Nonlinear Dynamics, v. 111, n. 1, p. 529-548, 2023

work page 2023
[32]

Existence of periodic so- lutions to quaternion-valued impulsive differential equations.Qualitative Theory of Dynamical Systems, v

Suo, Leping; Fečkan, Michal; Wang, JinRong. Existence of periodic so- lutions to quaternion-valued impulsive differential equations.Qualitative Theory of Dynamical Systems, v. 22, n. 1, p. 1, 2023

work page 2023
[33]

CRC Press, 2018

Strogatz, Steven H.Nonlinear dynamics and chaos with student solutions manual: With applications to physics, biology, chemistry, and engineering. CRC Press, 2018

work page 2018
[34]

Gauge theories.Gauge Theories in the Twentieth Century, p

Taylor, John C. Gauge theories.Gauge Theories in the Twentieth Century, p. 381, 2001

work page 2001
[35]

Conformal field the- ory on the universal family of stable curves with gauge symmetries

Tsuchiya, Akihiro; Ueno, Kenji; Yamada, Yasuhiko. Conformal field the- ory on the universal family of stable curves with gauge symmetries. In: Integrable Sys Quantum Field Theory. Academic Press, 1989. p. 459-566

work page 1989
[36]

Dynamics at infinity and a Hopf bifurcation arising in a quadratic system with coexisting attractors.Pramana, v

Wang, Zhen et al. Dynamics at infinity and a Hopf bifurcation arising in a quadratic system with coexisting attractors.Pramana, v. 90, n. 1, p. 12, 2018

work page 2018
[37]

Handbook of differential equa- tions

Zwillinger, Daniel; Dobrushkin, Vladimir. Handbook of differential equa- tions. CRC Press, 2021. 18

work page 2021

[1] [1]

Admiral, Tiago Destéffani. RESOLUÇÃO DE EDO’S UTILIZANDO MÉTODOS NUMÉRICOS DE ORDEM SUPERIOR COM LINGUAGEM PYTHON: EDO SOLUTIONS USING HIGHER ORDER NUMERICAL METHODS WITH PYTHON LANGUAGE.Caderno de Física da UEFS, v. 20, n. 01, p. 1403.1-11, 2022

work page 2022

[2] [2]

Optimization of a Runge-Kutta 4th Or- der Method-based Airbrake Control System for High-Speed Vehicles Using Neural Networks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.12038, 2023

Agrawal, Tanvi; Anand, Utkarsh. Optimization of a Runge-Kutta 4th Or- der Method-based Airbrake Control System for High-Speed Vehicles Using Neural Networks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.12038, 2023

work page arXiv 2023

[3] [3]

Ordinary differential equations

Arnold, Vladimir I. Ordinary differential equations. Springer Science & Business Media, 1992

work page 1992

[4] [4]

Baleanu, Dumitruetal.Onanonlineardynamicalsystemwithbothchaotic and nonchaotic behaviors: a new fractional analysis and control.Advances in Difference Equations, v. 2021, n. 1, p. 1-17, 2021

work page 2021

[5] [5]

Visual analysis of nonlinear dynamical systems: chaos, frac- tals, self-similarity and the limits of prediction.Systems, v

Boeing, Geoff. Visual analysis of nonlinear dynamical systems: chaos, frac- tals, self-similarity and the limits of prediction.Systems, v. 4, n. 4, p. 37, 2016

work page 2016

[6] [6]

Detection of attraction domains of non-linear systems using bifurcation analysis and Lyapunov functions.In- ternational Journal of Control, v

Barreiro, A.; Aracil, J.; Pagano, D. Detection of attraction domains of non-linear systems using bifurcation analysis and Lyapunov functions.In- ternational Journal of Control, v. 75, n. 5, p. 314-327, 2002

work page 2002

[7] [7]

Poincaré maps for detecting chaos in fractional-order systems with hidden attractors for its Kaplan-Yorke di- mension optimization.AIMS Math, v

Clemente-López, Daniel, et al. Poincaré maps for detecting chaos in fractional-order systems with hidden attractors for its Kaplan-Yorke di- mension optimization.AIMS Math, v. 7, n. 4, p. 5871-5894, 2022

work page 2022

[8] [8]

Propos- ing the Alpha Group.International Journal for Research in Engineering Application & Management (IJREAM)

Corrêa, Cleber S.; de Melo, Thiago B.; Custodio, Diogo M. Propos- ing the Alpha Group.International Journal for Research in Engineering Application & Management (IJREAM). Volume 08, Issue 05. 2022. doi: 10.35291/2454-9150.2022.0421

work page doi:10.35291/2454-9150.2022.0421 2022

[9] [9]

The Alpha Group Tensorial Metric.Revista Brasileira de História da Matemática – (RBHM)

Corrêa, Cleber S.; de Melo, Thiago B.; Custodio, Diogo M. The Alpha Group Tensorial Metric.Revista Brasileira de História da Matemática – (RBHM). V. 24, Nº 48, p. 51-57, 2024

work page 2024

[10] [10]

Division as a radial vector relation- ship – Alpha group.Studies in Engineering and Exact Sciences, v

Corrêa, Cleber S.; de Melo, Thiago B. Division as a radial vector relation- ship – Alpha group.Studies in Engineering and Exact Sciences, v. 6, n. 1, e16083, 2025. DOI: 10.54021/seesv6n1-037

work page doi:10.54021/seesv6n1-037 2025

[11] [11]

Hybrid symbolic-numeric framework for power system modeling and analysis

Cui, Hantao; Li, Fangxing; Tomsovic, Kevin. Hybrid symbolic-numeric framework for power system modeling and analysis. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, v. 36, n. 2, p. 1373-1384, 2020. 16

work page 2020

[12] [12]

APLI- CAÇÕES DE SISTEMAS DINÂMICOS COM PYTHON EM ECONO- MIA: UMA SIMULAÇÃO NUMÉRICA DE INFLAÇÃO X DESEM- PREGO COM RUNGE-KUTTA12

De Aragão Batista, Alexandre Ricardo; Masiero, Marcela Caroline. APLI- CAÇÕES DE SISTEMAS DINÂMICOS COM PYTHON EM ECONO- MIA: UMA SIMULAÇÃO NUMÉRICA DE INFLAÇÃO X DESEM- PREGO COM RUNGE-KUTTA12. 2023

work page 2023

[13] [13]

De Silva, Brian M. et al. Pysindy: a Python package for the sparse identifi- cation of nonlinear dynamics from data.arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.08424, 2020

work page arXiv 2004

[14] [14]

Ince, EdwardL.Ordinary differential equations.CourierCorporation, 1956

work page 1956

[15] [15]

Courier Dover Publications, 2018

Graham, Alexander.Kronecker products and matrix calculus with applica- tions. Courier Dover Publications, 2018

work page 2018

[16] [16]

Courier Corporation, 2009

Hale, Jack K.Ordinary differential equations. Courier Corporation, 2009

work page 2009

[17] [17]

New York, US: Springer International Publishing AG, 2017

Hamilton, Mark JD.Mathematical gauge theory. New York, US: Springer International Publishing AG, 2017

work page 2017

[18] [18]

Array programming with NumPy.Nature, v

Harris, C.R., Millman, K.J., Van Der Walt, S.J., et al. Array programming with NumPy.Nature, v. 585, 357–362, 2020.https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-020-2649-2

work page 2020

[19] [19]

Academic Press, 2012

Hirsch, Morris W.; Smale, Stephen; Devaney, Robert L.Differential equa- tions, dynamical systems, and an introduction to chaos. Academic Press, 2012

work page 2012

[20] [20]

Learning differential equations that are easy to solve

Kelly, Jacob et al. Learning differential equations that are easy to solve. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, v. 33, p. 4370-4380, 2020

work page 2020

[21] [21]

An introduction to lattice gauge theory and spin systems

Kogut, John B. An introduction to lattice gauge theory and spin systems. Reviews of Modern Physics, v. 51, n. 4, p. 659, 1979

work page 1979

[22] [22]

Kuznetsov, N. V. et al. Finite-time Lyapunov dimension and hidden at- tractor of the Rabinovich system.Nonlinear dynamics, v. 92, p. 267-285, 2018

work page 2018

[23] [23]

Extended dynamic mode decomposition for two paradigms of non-linear dynamical systems

Leventides, John; Melas, Evangelos; Poulios, Costas. Extended dynamic mode decomposition for two paradigms of non-linear dynamical systems. Journal of the Franklin Institute, v. 360, n. 3, p. 2234-2264, 2023

work page 2023

[24] [24]

USA: Trelgol Publishing, 2006

Oliphant, Travis E., et al.Guide to numpy. USA: Trelgol Publishing, 2006

work page 2006

[25] [25]

Gauge theory: Historical origins and some modern developments.Reviews of Modern Physics, v

O’Raifeartaigh, Lochlainn; Straumann, Norbert. Gauge theory: Historical origins and some modern developments.Reviews of Modern Physics, v. 72, n. 1, p. 1, 2000

work page 2000

[26] [26]

Press, William H., et al.Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing. 1992. 17

work page 1992

[27] [27]

Program Design and Implementation of Y Class Matrix Eigenvalue Based on Python Language

Qin, Weida; Wei, Yinhu; Luo, Ricai. Program Design and Implementation of Y Class Matrix Eigenvalue Based on Python Language. In:2022 Asia- Pacific Computer Technologies Conference (APCT). IEEE, 2022. p. 68-73

work page 2022

[28] [28]

CRC Press, 2021

Quigg, Chris.Gauge theories of strong, weak, and electromagnetic interac- tions. CRC Press, 2021

work page 2021

[29] [29]

Lattice gauge theories: an introduction

Rothe, Heinz J. Lattice gauge theories: an introduction. World Scientific Publishing Company, 2012

work page 2012

[30] [30]

Gauge unification of fundamental forces.Reviews of Modern Physics, v

Salam, Abdus. Gauge unification of fundamental forces.Reviews of Modern Physics, v. 52, n. 3, p. 525, 1980

work page 1980

[31] [31]

Poincaré maps: a modern systematic approach toward obtaining effective sections.Nonlinear Dynamics, v

Shahhosseini, Amir; Tien, Meng-Hsuan; D’Souza, Kiran. Poincaré maps: a modern systematic approach toward obtaining effective sections.Nonlinear Dynamics, v. 111, n. 1, p. 529-548, 2023

work page 2023

[32] [32]

Existence of periodic so- lutions to quaternion-valued impulsive differential equations.Qualitative Theory of Dynamical Systems, v

Suo, Leping; Fečkan, Michal; Wang, JinRong. Existence of periodic so- lutions to quaternion-valued impulsive differential equations.Qualitative Theory of Dynamical Systems, v. 22, n. 1, p. 1, 2023

work page 2023

[33] [33]

CRC Press, 2018

Strogatz, Steven H.Nonlinear dynamics and chaos with student solutions manual: With applications to physics, biology, chemistry, and engineering. CRC Press, 2018

work page 2018

[34] [34]

Gauge theories.Gauge Theories in the Twentieth Century, p

Taylor, John C. Gauge theories.Gauge Theories in the Twentieth Century, p. 381, 2001

work page 2001

[35] [35]

Conformal field the- ory on the universal family of stable curves with gauge symmetries

Tsuchiya, Akihiro; Ueno, Kenji; Yamada, Yasuhiko. Conformal field the- ory on the universal family of stable curves with gauge symmetries. In: Integrable Sys Quantum Field Theory. Academic Press, 1989. p. 459-566

work page 1989

[36] [36]

Dynamics at infinity and a Hopf bifurcation arising in a quadratic system with coexisting attractors.Pramana, v

Wang, Zhen et al. Dynamics at infinity and a Hopf bifurcation arising in a quadratic system with coexisting attractors.Pramana, v. 90, n. 1, p. 12, 2018

work page 2018

[37] [37]

Handbook of differential equa- tions

Zwillinger, Daniel; Dobrushkin, Vladimir. Handbook of differential equa- tions. CRC Press, 2021. 18

work page 2021