Einstein metrics, their moduli spaces and stability

Paul Schwahn; Uwe Semmelmann

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 4 cited by

Einstein metrics, their moduli spaces and stability

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Stability and rigidity of Einstein metrics reduce to one spectral inequality.

desk verdict A careful, honest survey that does its job; treat Section 7 as provisional until the unpublished theorem it relies on appears. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.18463 v3 pith:PS64KZ2T submitted 2025-07-24 math.DG

Paul Schwahn , Uwe Semmelmann This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.DG MSC 53C2553C2153E2058D2753C24

keywords EinsteinmetricsstabilitymodulispacerigidityLichnerowiczLaplaciantransversetracelesstensorsspecialholonomyKillingspinors

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This survey argues that, on a compact Einstein manifold, stability of the Einstein–Hilbert action and deformability of the metric are, to first order, one and the same spectral question. Both are governed by the Lichnerowicz Laplacian $\Delta_L$ acting on transverse traceless (divergence-free, trace-free) symmetric 2-tensors: linear stability is the inequality $\Delta_L > 2E$, and infinitesimal Einstein deformations are exactly the tt-eigentensors of $\Delta_L$ at the eigenvalue $2E$, where $E$ is the Einstein constant. The survey assembles the classical theory and a wide range of recent results for special holonomy, Killing spinors, and homogeneous spaces, consistently organized around this single operator. A sympathetic reader comes away with a concrete claim: one spectral computation on a compact Einstein metric determines both its local rigidity and its local stability.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Lichnerowicz Laplacian, $\Delta_L = \nabla^*\nabla + K(R)$, a Laplace-type operator acting on any geometric vector bundle, where $K(R)$ is the standard curvature endomorphism built from the Riemannian curvature tensor. On an Einstein metric with $\operatorname{Ric} g = Eg$, it preserves the space $S^2_{tt}(M)$ of transverse traceless symmetric 2-tensors, and $\Delta_L - 2E$ restricted to this space is the linearized Einstein operator. The machinery also includes the Weitzenböck formula $\delta\delta^* - \delta^*\delta = \Delta_L - 2K(R)$, the bound $\Delta_L \ge 2K(R)$ with equality on trace-free Killing tensors, and the exact sequence of Theorem 2.21, which relates divergence-free symmetric tensors to 1-forms and conformal Killing fields. Together these convert stability and rigidity into a spectral computation for $\Delta_L$.

What would settle it

Choose a compact Einstein metric $g$ with Einstein constant $E\le 0$ and compute the lowest eigenvalue of $\Delta_L - 2E$ on transverse traceless symmetric 2-tensors. The survey's reduction predicts that a negative eigenvalue (a tt-tensor with $\langle \Delta_L h,h\rangle < 2E\langle h,h\rangle$) gives a destabilizing direction and hence $S$-instability; finding a compact example with such a direction that is nevertheless a local maximum of the Einstein–Hilbert action on the unit-volume constant-scalar-curvature slice would refute the claimed equivalence. Conversely, finding a compact Einstein metric with $\varepsilon(g)=0$ that is still not rigid would refute the rigidity criterion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is the formula for the second variation, $S''_g(h,h) = -\frac{1}{2}\langle (\Delta_L - 2E)h, h\rangle_{L^2}$ for $h$ transverse traceless, together with the identification $\varepsilon(g) = \ker(\Delta_L - 2E)|_{S^2_{tt}(M)}$. Strict linear stability is $\Delta_L > 2E$ on $S^2_{tt}$, semistability is $\Delta_L \ge 2E$, and the same critical eigenvalue $2E$ controls dynamical stability under the volume-normalized Ricci flow through the Laplace–Beltrami spectrum, as well as the second-order obstruction to integrating infinitesimal Einstein deformations, expressed by the cubic form $\Psi$. The survey's synthesis is that the spectrum and eigentensors of $\Delta_L$ on transverse traceless tensors form the backbone of both the stability theory and the local moduli-space theory of Einstein metrics on compact manifolds.

Load-bearing premise

The entire framework is restricted to compact manifolds: the second-variation formula, the slice theorem, the local arcwise connectedness of the moduli space, and the equivalence of $S$-stability with scalar curvature rigidity all rely on compactness, and the survey does not claim the same reduction away from it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If $\varepsilon(g) = 0$, i.e. there are no transverse traceless eigentensors of $\Delta_L$ at $2E$, then $g$ is rigid: its class is isolated in the Einstein moduli space.
If $\Delta_L > 2E$ on nonzero transverse traceless tensors, then $g$ is strictly linearly stable, hence $S$-stable and scalar-curvature rigid on compact manifolds.
If the second-order obstruction $\Psi$ does not vanish identically on $\varepsilon(g)$, then $g$ is $S$-unstable even when it is semistable; this is how several symmetric spaces are shown to be unstable despite admitting infinitesimal deformations.
On compact Einstein metrics of nonpositive scalar curvature, $S$-stability is equivalent to dynamical stability under the volume-normalized Ricci flow, so the spectral sign of $\Delta_L - 2E$ has dynamical meaning.
If a semistable metric has all its infinitesimal Einstein deformations integrable, it is $S$-stable; this is the route by which metrics admitting parallel spinors are shown to be $S$-stable.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A testable extension suggested by the survey is that the lowest eigenvalue of $\Delta_L - 2E$ on $S^2_{tt}(M)$ should be computable, or at least bounded, on any compact Einstein metric for which the Hodge Laplacian on 1-forms and the conformal Killing fields are understood, because the exact sequence of Theorem 2.21 transfers the spectral problem down to those objects.
One could push the same spectral reduction to higher order: when $\varepsilon(g) = 0$ and $\Delta_L - 2E$ has a positive gap on tt-tensors, linear rigidity should combine with the implicit function theorem to give local uniqueness of the Einstein metric in the slice, an outcome the survey leaves implicit.
For the open conjecture that compact Einstein manifolds of nonpositive scalar curvature are all $S$-stable, the framework suggests a concrete search: a destabilizing direction, if it exists, must be a tt-eigentensor of $\Delta_L$ below $2E$, and the known semistability of Ricci-flat manifolds with parallel spinors indicates the obstruction is spinorial.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

This is a survey, not a research paper, and its value is as a current, reliable map of the stability and deformation theory of Einstein metrics on compact manifolds. The organizing idea is the Lichnerowicz Laplacian, and the authors show clearly how both linear stability and infinitesimal deformability reduce to its spectrum on tt-tensors. That claim is standard, but it is stated with unusual care, and the exposition around it is precise enough to be genuinely useful.

What the paper does well is synthesis. The opening sections on the Einstein–Hilbert action, the various stability notions, and the moduli space are concise and accurate. The adapted proof of Theorem 3.12 — semistability plus integrability of all infinitesimal Einstein deformations implies S-stability — is a real service, since the result was previously only implicit in the cited literature. The later sections on parallel spinors, Killing spinors, nearly Kähler and G2 manifolds, and homogeneous spaces bring together recent results that would otherwise require reading a dozen papers. The open questions are stated honestly and are well chosen.

The main caveat is exactly where the reader put it: Section 7 relies on Theorem 7.3, which the authors themselves label as unpublished work of Homma–Semmelmann. That makes the positive quaternion-Kähler stability discussion provisional, and the paper already flags it. Nothing central relies on that theorem, and the rest of the survey stands without it. The frequent self-citations are noticeable but not objectionable; the authors are summarizing their own recent work, and the attributions check out elsewhere. The compactness assumption is explicit and appropriate to the methods.

This is not a paper that breaks new ground, but it is a serious scholarly exposition. Its likely readers are graduate students entering the area and researchers who want a trustworthy reference for a specific geometric setting. I would be happy to see it published as a survey once the referee has checked the adapted proof and the one unpublished citation is clearly marked. I would also bring it to a reading group, because the coherent presentation of the Lichnerowicz reduction and its consequences is exactly the kind of thing a group benefits from reading together.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper is a survey article on the stability of Einstein metrics under the Einstein–Hilbert action and on the local structure of the Einstein moduli space on compact manifolds. It introduces the second variation of the action in terms of the Lichnerowicz Laplacian and identifies infinitesimal Einstein deformations with tt-eigentensors at the critical eigenvalue 2E. It then reviews the Ebin slice and premoduli space constructions, the second-order obstruction Ψ, and surveys a broad range of geometric settings: products and submersions, parallel-spinor Ricci-flat manifolds, Kähler–Einstein metrics, quaternion-Kähler metrics, Killing spinors, and homogeneous spaces. The exposition is explicitly restricted to compact manifolds and includes a number of open problems and conjectures.

Significance. As a survey, the paper is a useful and largely accurate synthesis. The central claim that, to first order, both linear stability and infinitesimal deformability are controlled by the spectrum of Δ_L − 2E on transverse traceless tensors is a standard theorem, and it is presented correctly, with care taken to distinguish first-order spectral information from the second-order obstruction Ψ. The paper gives a clear account of recent developments, including work by the authors and their collaborators on homogeneous spaces, and it is commendable for stating its scope explicitly and for collecting open problems. The main weaknesses are the reliance on an unpublished theorem in Section 7 and the too-brief proof of Theorem 3.12; neither undermines the survey's central message, but both should be addressed before final publication.

major comments (2)

[§7 (Theorem 7.3)] Theorem 7.3 is stated as a theorem and is used to narrow the possible destabilizing eigenspaces for positive quaternion-Kähler manifolds, but the paper itself labels it as an unpublished result of Homma–Semmelmann and gives no proof. Since the reference [58] is a preprint, the structural claims of Section 7 cannot be independently checked as written. Please either include a proof or a detailed proof sketch, mark the statement clearly as an announced result whose proof is to appear elsewhere, or state explicitly which conclusions in Section 7 do not depend on Theorem 7.3.
[§3.2 (Theorem 3.12)] The proof of Theorem 3.12 begins with the assertion that, because all IED are integrable, the premoduli space eEg is a submanifold of the slice with tangent space ε(g). Definition 3.11 provides, for each h ∈ ε(g), a curve of Einstein metrics, but it does not by itself provide a smooth family of such curves parametrized by ε(g), which is what the subsequent normal-bundle argument requires. Please add a lemma or a reference showing that in this real-analytic setting individual integrability of all IED implies that eEg is a submanifold, or revise the proof to avoid this step.

minor comments (6)

[§3.2] The sentence 'By an approximation argument of M. Artin, an IED is integrable if and only if it is formally integrable to every order' is a nontrivial assertion and should carry a citation to Artin's work or to a standard reference on Artin approximation.
[§5 (Theorem 5.2)] In Theorem 5.2, the Hodge number h^{m−1,1} uses m without a definition; please state that m = dim_C M for the Calabi–Yau manifold.
[§9.3 (Theorem 9.11)] In the statement of Theorem 9.11(ii), the phrase 'with m odd' is ambiguous in case (2), where the relevant Lie algebra is su(n)⊕su(n); please clarify what m denotes in each of the listed cases and why the parity condition is the right one.
[§7 (Theorem 7.3)] The bundle V in Theorem 7.3(ii) is introduced only through the identity V^C = Sym^2 H ⊗ Sym^2 E; a short definition of V in the Salamon E-H formalism would improve readability.
[§2.4] In the paragraph before Theorem 2.15, the phrase 'the criterion to be a local maximizer of ν' is vague, since the shrinker entropy ν is not defined in this survey; please add a definition or a precise reference for this functional.
[Throughout] The notation for the spin-c structure appears both as 'spin c' and as 'spin^c'; please use one consistent notation throughout.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the first-order Lichnerowicz reduction is a quoted spectral identity, not a self-referential construction.

full rationale

The survey's central claim, that to first order both stability and infinitesimal deformability are governed by the spectrum of the Lichnerowicz Laplacian on tt-tensors, is a direct consequence of displayed standard identities rather than a definitional loop. Theorem 2.20 gives S''_g(h,h) = -1/2 <(Δ_L - 2E)h,h> on S^2_tt(M), and Theorem 3.8 gives E'_g = 1/2(Δ_L - 2E) - δ*β together with T_gS_g ∩ ker E'_g = ε(g). The space ε(g) is first defined independently in Definition 2.7 as ker S''_g|_tt, so the identification with ker(Δ_L - 2E)|_tt is a consequence, not an assumption. The Berger-Koiso decomposition, Ebin slice theorem, and Yamabe/entropy comparisons are attributed to earlier authors and are not used as self-referential premises. No parameter is fitted to a subset of data and then renamed as a prediction, and no quantity is defined in terms of the outcome it is supposed to explain. Self-citations occur throughout, as is normal in a survey, but they are references to prior stated results. The only passage that could raise a verifiability flag is the introduction of Theorem 7.3: 'In the following unpublished result of Homma–Semmelmann [58], the possible destabilizing directions are narrowed down.' This is a self-citation for one of the authors and an omitted proof, but it is not load-bearing for the central first-order reduction claim; it concerns positive quaternion-Kähler manifolds and is presented as prior work. Under the hard-rule standard, that is a verifiability caveat, not a circular step. No equation in the paper reduces to its own input by construction, so the honest finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

As a survey, the paper introduces no free parameters or new entities. Its load-bearing inputs are standard compact-manifold theorems plus one explicitly unpublished result used in the quaternion-Kähler section.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The manifold M is compact.
Stated in the introduction; the Berger-Koiso decomposition (Thm 2.4), Ebin slice theorem (Thm 3.3), and arcwise connectedness (Thm 3.9) all require compactness.
standard math For Einstein metrics, Δ_L commutes with the divergence operator and preserves transverse traceless tensors.
Invoked around Section 2.5 before Theorem 2.20 and Corollary 2.22; it is a standard computation in Laplace operator theory.
standard math The Berger-Koiso orthogonal decomposition TgM1 = C∞⊥(M)g ⊕ L_X(M)g ⊕ S^2_tt(M) holds.
This decomposition is the basis for defining stability and infinitesimal Einstein deformations on tt-tensors; it is a cited result, not proved in the survey.
standard math The Einstein operator is real analytic on an Ebin slice, so the premoduli space is a real analytic subset.
Used in Section 3.1 to prove local arcwise connectedness and the rigidity criterion in Theorem 3.9.
ad hoc to paper Theorem 7.3 of Homma-Semmelmann (unpublished) holds.
The survey explicitly labels this as an unpublished result [58] and uses it to restrict destabilizing directions on positive quaternion-Kähler manifolds; this is the main unverified input.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Einstein metrics, their moduli spaces and stability." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PS64KZ2T

@misc{pith2026250718463,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Einstein metrics, their moduli spaces and stability},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PS64KZ2T}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.18463}
}

read the original abstract

This survey deals with two closely connected topics: first, the stability of Einstein metrics under the Einstein-Hilbert functional, and second, their deformation theory and the study of the moduli space of Einstein metrics on a compact manifold. To first order, both problems reduce to studying the spectrum and eigentensors of the Lichnerowicz Laplacian. We give an introduction to the classical theory and survey recent results and advances.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

A negative K\"ahler-Einstein threefold with non-integrable infinitesimal Einstein deformations
math.DG 2026-08 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

A smooth non-product canonically polarized threefold is constructed whose Kähler-Einstein metric has an 8-dimensional space of infinitesimal Einstein deformations, with exactly a 6-dimensional integrable subspace.
Einstein Metrics and Equivariant Harmonic Maps: The Einstein Detection Principle
math.DG 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A response-theoretic framework in which harmonic probe packages generate response operators whose first-order variations can, under injectivity and nondegeneracy hypotheses, detect and locally reconstruct infinitesima...
Third order Einstein deformations for Kaehler-Einstein metrics
math.DG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

Explicit third-order obstruction to Einstein deformations of Kähler-Einstein metrics is reduced to Maurer-Cartan equations and polynomial identities on metric coefficients via the Cayley transform.
Cohomogeneity one Einstein metrics on complex projective spaces
math.DG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

Nonexistence of smooth cohomogeneity one invariant Einstein metrics on CP^n for four of Takagi's five models, plus a necessary condition for the remaining model.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

132 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

[58]

Homma, U

Y. Homma, U. Semmelmann:Eigenvalue estimates and stability on positive quaternion K¨ ahler manifolds,https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.01333(2026)

work page arXiv 2026
[1]

Alexandrov, U

B. Alexandrov, U. Semmelmann:Deformations of nearly parallelG 2-structures, Asian J. Math. 16 (4), 713–744 (2012)

2012
[2]

Ammann, K

B. Ammann, K. Kr¨ oncke, H. Weiss, F. Witt:Holonomy rigidity for Ricci-flat metrics, Math. Z. 291, 303–311 (2019)

2019
[3]

M. T. Anderson:A survey of Einstein metrics on 4-manifolds,https://arxiv. org/abs/0810.4830

work page Pith review arXiv
[4]

Andersson, V

L. Andersson, V. Moncrief:Einstein spaces as attractors for the Einstein flow, J. Differential Geom. 89, no. 1, 1–47 (2011)

2011
[5]

B¨ ar:Real Killing spinors and holonomy, Comm

C. B¨ ar:Real Killing spinors and holonomy, Comm. Math. Phys. 154, no. 3, 509– 521 (1993)

1993
[6]

Batat, S

W. Batat, S. J. Hall, T. Murphy:Destabilising compact warped product Einstein manifolds, Comm. Anal. Geom. 29 (5), 1061–1094 (2021)

2021
[7]

Batat, S

W. Batat, S. J. Hall, T. Murphy, J. Waldron:Rigidity ofSU n-type symmetric spaces, Internat. Math. Research Notices 2024 (3), 2066–2098 (2024)

2024

Show all 132 references

[8]

Baum:Complete Riemannian manifolds with imaginary Killing spinors, Ann

H. Baum:Complete Riemannian manifolds with imaginary Killing spinors, Ann. Glob. Anal. Geom. 7, no. 3, 205–226 (1989)

1989
[9]

H. Baum, T. Friedrich, R. Grunewald, I. Kath:Twistors and Killing spinors on Riemannian manifolds, Teubner-Texte zur Mathematik, 124. B. G. Teubner Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Stuttgart (1991)

1991
[10]

Belgun, V

F. Belgun, V. Cort´ es, A. S. Haupt, D. Lindemann:Left-invariant Einstein metrics onS 3×S 3, J. Geom. Phys. 128, 128–139 (2018)

2018
[11]

A. L. Besse:Einstein manifolds, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzge- biete 3rd Series 10, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1987)

1987
[12]

Biquard:D´ esingularisation de m´ etriques d’Einstein I, Invent

O. Biquard:D´ esingularisation de m´ etriques d’Einstein I, Invent. Math. 192 (1), 197–252 (2013)

2013
[13]

Biquard:D´ esingularisation de m´ etriques d’Einstein II, Invent

O. Biquard:D´ esingularisation de m´ etriques d’Einstein II, Invent. Math. 204 (2), 473–504 (2016)

2016
[14]

Biquard, T

O. Biquard, T. Ozuch:Instability of conformally K¨ ahler, Einstein metrics,https: //arxiv.org/abs/2310.10109, to appear in J. Diff. Geom. (2023)

2023 arXiv
[15]

B¨ ohm:Inhomogeneous Einstein metrics on low-dimensional spheres and other low-dimensional spaces, Invent

C. B¨ ohm:Inhomogeneous Einstein metrics on low-dimensional spheres and other low-dimensional spaces, Invent. math. 134, 145-176 (1998) 49

1998
[16]

B¨ ohm:Homogeneous Einstein metrics and simplicial complexes, J

C. B¨ ohm:Homogeneous Einstein metrics and simplicial complexes, J. Diff. Geom. 67, 79–165 (2004)

2004
[17]

B¨ ohm, M

C. B¨ ohm, M. Wang, W. Ziller:A variational approach for compact homogeneous Einstein manifolds, Geom. Funct. Anal. 14, 681–733 (2004)

2004
[18]

B¨ ohm:Unstable Einstein metrics, Math

C. B¨ ohm:Unstable Einstein metrics, Math. Z. 250, 279–286 (2005)

2005
[19]

C. P. Boyer, K. Galicki, J. Koll´ ar:Einstein metrics on spheres, Ann. Math. 162 (1), 557–580 (2005)

2005
[20]

Branca, K

L. Branca, K. Kr¨ oncke:Some isolation and stability results for Einstein manifolds, https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.13248(2025)

2025 arXiv
[21]

Bredon,Introduction to Compact Transformation Groups, Pure and Applied Mathematics 46, Academic Press (1972)

G. Bredon,Introduction to Compact Transformation Groups, Pure and Applied Mathematics 46, Academic Press (1972)

1972
[22]

Butruille:Classification des varietes approximativement k¨ ahleriennes homo- genes, Ann

J.-B. Butruille:Classification des varietes approximativement k¨ ahleriennes homo- genes, Ann. Global Anal. Geom. 27, no. 3, 201–225 (2005)

2005
[23]

Buttsworth, M

T. Buttsworth, M. Hallgren:Local stability of Einstein metrics under the Ricci iteration, J. Funct. Anal. 280, 108801 (2021)

2021
[24]

H.-D. Cao, R. Hamilton, T. Ilmanen:Gaussian densities and stability for some Ricci solitons,https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0404165(2004)

2004 arXiv
[25]

H.-D. Cao, C. He:Linear stability of Perelman’sν-entropy on symmetric spaces of compact type, J. Reine Angew. Math. 709, 229–246 (2015)

2015
[26]

X. Chen, C. LeBrun, B. Weber:On conformally K¨ ahler, Einstein manifolds, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 21, 1137–1168 (2008)

2008
[27]

X. Chen, S. Donaldson, S. Sun:K¨ ahler–Einstein metrics on Fano manifolds, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 28, I: 183–197, II: 199–234, III: 235–278 (2014)

2014
[28]

van Coevering:Sasaki–Einstein 5-manifolds associated to toric 3-Sasaki man- ifolds, New York J

C. van Coevering:Sasaki–Einstein 5-manifolds associated to toric 3-Sasaki man- ifolds, New York J. Math. 18, 555–608 (2012)

2012
[29]

van Coevering:Deformations of Killing spinors on Sasakian and 3-Sasakian manifolds, J

C. van Coevering:Deformations of Killing spinors on Sasakian and 3-Sasakian manifolds, J. Math. Soc. Japan 69 (1), 53–91 (2017)

2017
[30]

T. C. Collins, G. Sz´ ekelyhidi:Sasaki–Einstein metrics and K-stability, Geom. Topol. 23 (3), 1339–1413 (2019)

2019
[31]

M. Dahl, K. Kr¨ oncke:Local and global scalar curvature rigidity of Einstein man- ifolds, Math. Ann. 388, 453–510 (2024)

2024
[32]

X. Dai, X. Wang, G. Wei:On the stability of Riemannian manifold with parallel spinors, Invent. math. 161, 151–176 (2005) 50

2005
[33]

Dai:Stability of Einstein Metrics and Spin Structures, Proceedings of the 4th International Congress of Chinese Mathematicians, Vol

X. Dai:Stability of Einstein Metrics and Spin Structures, Proceedings of the 4th International Congress of Chinese Mathematicians, Vol. II, 59-72 (2007)

2007
[34]

X. Dai, X. Wang, G. Wei:On the variational stability of K¨ ahler–Einstein metrics, Comm. Anal. Geom. 14 (4), 669-–693 (2007)

2007
[35]

J. E. D’Atri, W. Ziller:Naturally reductive metrics and Einstein metrics on com- pact Lie groups, Memoirs AMS 18:215 (1979)

1979
[36]

Delay:TT–eigentensors for the Lichnerowicz Laplacian on some asymptotically hyperbolic manifolds with warped products metrics, Manuscripta Math

E. Delay:TT–eigentensors for the Lichnerowicz Laplacian on some asymptotically hyperbolic manifolds with warped products metrics, Manuscripta Math. 123, no. 2, 147–165 (2007)

2007
[37]

Feldman, T

M. Feldman, T. Ilmanen, L. Ni:Entropy and reduced distance for Ricci expanders, J. Geom. Anal. 15, no. 1, 49–62 (2005)

2005
[38]

J. Fine, K. Krasnov, M. Singer:Local rigidity of Einstein 4-manifolds satisfying a chiral curvature condition, Math. Ann. 379, 569–588 (2021)

2021
[39]

A. E. Fischer, J. E. Marsden:Linearization stability of the Einstein equations, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 79:5, 997–1003 (1973)

1973
[40]

Fischer, J

A. Fischer, J. Wolf:The structure of compact Ricci-flat Riemannian manifolds, J. Diff. Geom. 10, 277–288 (1975)

1975
[41]

Foscolo:Deformation theory of nearly K¨ ahler manifolds, J

L. Foscolo:Deformation theory of nearly K¨ ahler manifolds, J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 95, no. 2, 586–612 (2017)

2017
[42]

Foscolo, M

L. Foscolo, M. Haskins:NewG 2-holonomy cones and exotic nearly K¨ ahler struc- tures onS 6 andS 3×S 3, Ann. of Math. (2) 185, no. 1, 59–130 (2017)

2017
[43]

Friedrich, I

T. Friedrich, I. Kath, A. Moroianu, U. Semmelmann:On nearly parallelG 2- structures, J. Geom. Phys. 23, no. 3–4, 259–286 (1997)

1997
[44]

Fujitani:Compact suitably pinched Einstein manifolds, Bull

T. Fujitani:Compact suitably pinched Einstein manifolds, Bull. Fac. Liberal Arts Nagasaki Univ. 19, 1–5 (1979)

1979
[45]

Gasqui, H

J. Gasqui, H. Goldschmidt:Radon transforms and spectral rigidity on the complex quadrics and the real Grassmannians of rank two, J. Reine Angew. Math. 480, 1–69 (1996)

1996
[46]

G. W. Gibbons, S. A. Hartnoll:Gravitational instability in higher dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 66, 064024 (2002)

2002
[47]

G. W. Gibbons, S. A. Hartnoll, C. N. Pope:Bohm and Einstein–Sasaki metrics, black holes, and cosmological event horizons, Phys. Rev. D (3) 67, no. 8, 084024 (2003) 51

2003
[48]

Goto:Moduli spaces of topological calibrations, Calabi–Yau, hyperk¨ ahler,G 2 andSpin(7)structures, Internat

R. Goto:Moduli spaces of topological calibrations, Calabi–Yau, hyperk¨ ahler,G 2 andSpin(7)structures, Internat. J. Math. 115 (3), 211–257 (2004)

2004
[49]

Guti´ errez, J

V. Guti´ errez, J. Lauret:Stability of standard Einstein metrics on homogeneous spaces of non-simple Lie groups, Collectanea Math. 76, 273–284 (2025)

2025
[50]

Guti´ errez:Stability of non-diagonal Einstein metrics on homogeneous spaces H×H/∆K, Diff

V. Guti´ errez:Stability of non-diagonal Einstein metrics on homogeneous spaces H×H/∆K, Diff. Geom. Appl. 101, 102295 (2025)

2025
[51]

S. Hall, R. Haslhofer, M. Siepmann:The stability inequality for Ricci–flat cones, J. Geom. Anal. 24, no. 1, 472–494 (2014)

2014
[52]

S. J. Hall, T. Murphy, J. Waldron:Compact Hermitian Symmetric Spaces, Coad- joint Orbits, and the Dynamical Stability of the Ricci Flow, J. Geom. Anal. 31, 6195–6218 (2021)

2021
[53]

S. J. Hall, P. Schwahn, U. Semmelmann:On the rigidity of the complex Grass- mannians, Trans. AMS 378 (6), 4335–4367 (2025)

2025
[54]

S. J. Hall, P. Schwahn, U. Semmelmann:Sandwich operators and Einstein deformations of compact symmetric spaces related to Jordan algebras,https: //arxiv.org/abs/2412.08770

arXiv
[55]

Heber:Noncompact homogeneous Einstein spaces, Invent

J. Heber:Noncompact homogeneous Einstein spaces, Invent. math. 133, 279–352 (1998)

1998
[56]

K. Heil, A. Moroianu, U. Semmelmann:Killing and conformal Killing tensors, J. Geom. Phys. 106, 383–400 (2016)

2016
[57]

Homma:Estimating the eigenvalues on quaternionic K¨ ahler manifolds, Inter- nat

Y. Homma:Estimating the eigenvalues on quaternionic K¨ ahler manifolds, Inter- nat. J. Math. 17, no. 6, 665–691 (2006)

2006
[59]

Horikawa:Algebraic surfaces of general type with smallc 2 1, I, Ann

E. Horikawa:Algebraic surfaces of general type with smallc 2 1, I, Ann. Math. 104 (2), 357–387 (1976)

1976
[60]

M. Itoh, T. Nakagawa:Variational stability and local rigidity of Einstein metrics, Yokohama Math. J. 51, 103–115 (2005)

2005
[61]

Jensen:The scalar curvature of left-invariant Riemannian metrics, Indiana U

G. Jensen:The scalar curvature of left-invariant Riemannian metrics, Indiana U. Math. J. 20, 1125–1144 (1971)

1971
[62]

D. D. Joyce:Compact Manifolds with Special Holonomy, Oxford University Press (2000)

2000
[63]

Kr¨ amer,Eine Klassifikation bestimmter Untergruppen kompakter zusam- menh¨ angender Liegruppen, Comm

M. Kr¨ amer,Eine Klassifikation bestimmter Untergruppen kompakter zusam- menh¨ angender Liegruppen, Comm. Algebra 3 (8), 691–737 (1975) 52

1975
[64]

Knopf, N

D. Knopf, N. ˇSeˇ sum:Dynamic Instability ofCP N Under Ricci Flow, J. Geom. Anal. 29, 902–916 (2019)

2019
[65]

Kodaira, L

K. Kodaira, L. Nirenberg, D. C. Spencer:On the existence of deformations of complex analytic structures, Ann. Math. 68, 450–459 (1958)

1958
[66]

Koiso:Non-deformability of Einstein metrics, Osaka J

N. Koiso:Non-deformability of Einstein metrics, Osaka J. Math. 15, 419–433 (1978)

1978
[67]

Koiso:Rigidity and stability of Einstein metrics – The case of compact sym- metric spaces, Osaka J

N. Koiso:Rigidity and stability of Einstein metrics – The case of compact sym- metric spaces, Osaka J. Math. 17 (1), 51–73 (1980)

1980
[68]

Koiso:Rigidity and infinitesimal deformability of Einstein metrics, Osaka J

N. Koiso:Rigidity and infinitesimal deformability of Einstein metrics, Osaka J. Math. 19 (3), 643–668 (1982)

1982
[69]

Koiso:Einstein metrics and complex structures, Invent

N. Koiso:Einstein metrics and complex structures, Invent. Math. 73 (1), 71–106 (1983)

1983
[70]

Kr¨ oncke:On the stability of Einstein manifolds, Ann

K. Kr¨ oncke:On the stability of Einstein manifolds, Ann. Glob. Anal. Geom. 47, 81—98 (2015)

2015
[71]

Kr¨ oncke:On infinitesimal Einstein deformations, Diff

K. Kr¨ oncke:On infinitesimal Einstein deformations, Diff. Geom. Appl. 38, 41–57 (2015)

2015
[72]

Kr¨ oncke:Stability and instability of Ricci solitons, Calc

K. Kr¨ oncke:Stability and instability of Ricci solitons, Calc. Var. 53, 265–287 (2015)

2015
[73]

Kr¨ oncke:Rigidity and infinitesimal deformability of Ricci solitons, J

K. Kr¨ oncke:Rigidity and infinitesimal deformability of Ricci solitons, J. Geom. Anal. 26, 1795–1807 (2016)

2016
[74]

Kr¨ oncke:Stable and unstable Einstein warped products, Trans

K. Kr¨ oncke:Stable and unstable Einstein warped products, Trans. AMS 369 (9), 6537–6563 (2017)

2017
[75]

Kr¨ oncke:Stability of Einstein metrics under Ricci flow, Comm

K. Kr¨ oncke:Stability of Einstein metrics under Ricci flow, Comm. Anal. Geom. 28 (2), 351–394 (2020)

2020
[76]

Kr¨ oncke:Spectra, rigidity and stability of sine-cones, Journal of Functional Analysis 281, 109115 (2021)

K. Kr¨ oncke:Spectra, rigidity and stability of sine-cones, Journal of Functional Analysis 281, 109115 (2021)

2021
[77]

Kr¨ oncke, U

K. Kr¨ oncke, U. Semmelmann:On stability and scalar curvature rigidity of quaternion-K¨ ahler manifolds, to appear in Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa, Cl. Sci., https://doi.org/10.2422/2036-2145.202501_021(2025)

2025
[78]

Kr¨ oncke:Ricci flow and the scalar curvature rigidity of Einstein manifolds, to appear in the same volume

K. Kr¨ oncke:Ricci flow and the scalar curvature rigidity of Einstein manifolds, to appear in the same volume
[79]

E. A. Lauret, J. Lauret:The stability of standard homogeneous Einstein manifolds, Mathematische Zeitschrift 303, no. 16 (2023) 53

2023
[80]

E. A. Lauret, A. Tolcachier:Linear stability of Perelman’sν-entropy of standard Einstein manifolds,https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.12435(2025)

2025 arXiv
[81]

Lauret, C

J. Lauret, C. Will:Prescribing Ricci curvature on homogeneous spaces, J. Reine Angew. Math 783, 95–133 (2022)

2022
[82]

Lauret:On the stability of homogeneous Einstein manifolds, Asian J

J. Lauret:On the stability of homogeneous Einstein manifolds, Asian J. Math. 26:4, 555–584 (2022)

2022
[83]

Lauret, C

J. Lauret, C. Will:On the stability of homogeneous Einstein manifolds II, J. Lond. Math. Soc. 106, 3638–3669 (2022)

2022
[84]

Lauret, C

J. Lauret, C. Will:Homogeneous Einstein metrics and local maxima of the Hilbert action, J. Geom. Phys. 178, 104544 (2022)

2022
[85]

Lauret, C

J. Lauret, C. Will:Einstein metrics on homogeneous spacesH×H/∆K, Comm. Contemp. Math. (in press) no. 2550010 (2025)

2025
[86]

H. B. Lawson jr., M.-L. Michelsohn:Spin Geometry, Princeton University Press (1989)

1989
[87]

LeBrun:A rigidity theorem for quaternionic-K¨ ahler manifolds, Proc

C. LeBrun:A rigidity theorem for quaternionic-K¨ ahler manifolds, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 103 (4), 1205–1208 (1988)

1988
[88]

LeBrun:Einstein metrics and Mostow rigidity, Math

C. LeBrun:Einstein metrics and Mostow rigidity, Math. Res. Lett. 2, 1–8 (1995)

1995
[89]

LeBrun:Einstein metrics and the Yamabe problem, in: Trends in Mathematical Physics, Studies in Adv

C. LeBrun:Einstein metrics and the Yamabe problem, in: Trends in Mathematical Physics, Studies in Adv. Math. 13, AMS/IP (1999)

1999
[90]

LeBrun:Einstein metrics, harmonic forms, and symplectic four-manifolds, Ann

C. LeBrun:Einstein metrics, harmonic forms, and symplectic four-manifolds, Ann. Glob. Anal. Geom. 48, 75–85 (2015)

2015
[91]

Y. Li, W. Zhang:Rigidity of complex projective spaces in Ricci shrinkers, Calc. Var. 62:171 (2023)

2023
[92]

Y. Liu, T. Sano, L. Tasin:Infinitely many families of Sasaki–Einstein metrics on spheres, J. Diff. Geom. 130 (1), 1–26 (2025)

2025
[93]

O. V. Manturov:Homogeneous, non-symmetric Riemannian spaces with an irre- ducible rotation group, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 141, 792–795 (1961)

1961
[94]

O. V. Manturov:Riemannian spaces with orthogonal and symplectic motion groups and an irreducible rotation group, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 141, 1034–1037 (1961)

1961
[95]

O. V. Manturov:Homogeneous Riemannian manifolds with irreducible isotropy group, Trudy Sem. Vector. Tenzor. Anal. 13, 68–145 (1966) 54

1966
[96]

Moncrief:Spacetime symmetries and linearization stability of the Einstein equations

V. Moncrief:Spacetime symmetries and linearization stability of the Einstein equations. I, J. Math. Phys. 16, 493–498 (1975)

1975
[97]

Moncrief:Spacetime symmetries and linearization stability of the Einstein equations

V. Moncrief:Spacetime symmetries and linearization stability of the Einstein equations. II, J. Math. Phys. 17, 1893–1902 (1976)

1976
[98]

Moroianu:Parallel and Killing Spinors on Spin c Manifolds, Commun

A. Moroianu:Parallel and Killing Spinors on Spin c Manifolds, Commun. Math. Phys. 187, 417–427 (1997)

1997
[99]

Moroianu, U

A. Moroianu, U. Semmelmann:The Hermitian Laplace Operator on Nearly K¨ ahler Manifolds, Commun. Math. Phys. 294, 251–272 (2010)

2010
[100]

Moroianu, U

A. Moroianu, U. Semmelmann:Infinitesimal Einstein deformations of nearly K¨ ahler metrics, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 363, no. 6, 3057–3069 (2011)

2011
[101]

P.-A. Nagy, U. Semmelmann:Deformations of nearlyG 2 structures, J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 104, no. 4, 1795–1811 (2021)

2021
[102]

P.-A. Nagy, U. Semmelmann:Eigenvalue estimates for3-Sasaki structures, J. Reine Angew. Math. 803, 35–60 (2023)

2023
[103]

P.-A. Nagy, U. Semmelmann:TheG 2 geometry of3-Sasaki structures, J. Geom. Anal. 34, no. 2, Paper No. 61 (2024)

2024
[104]

P.-A. Nagy, U. Semmelmann:Second order Einstein deformations, J. Math. Soc. Japan 77 (2), (2025)

2025
[105]

Yu. G. Nikonorov:Algebraic structure of standard homogeneous Einstein mani- folds, Siberian Adv. Math. 10, 59–82 (2000)

2000
[106]

Yu. G. Nikonorov:On a characterization of critical points of the scalar curvature functional(Russian), Tr. Rubtsovsk. Ind. Inst. 7, 211–217 (2000); English version: https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.00993

2000 arXiv
[107]

Nordstr¨ om:Ricci-flat deformations of metrics with exceptional holonomy, Bull

J. Nordstr¨ om:Ricci-flat deformations of metrics with exceptional holonomy, Bull. London Math. Soc. 45, 1004–1018 (2013)

2013
[108]

Ozuch:Integrability of Einstein deformations and desingularizations, Comm

T. Ozuch:Integrability of Einstein deformations and desingularizations, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 77 (1), 177–220 (2023)

2023
[109]

Perelman:The entropy formula for the Ricci flow and its geometric applica- tions,https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0211159(2002)

G. Perelman:The entropy formula for the Ricci flow and its geometric applica- tions,https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0211159(2002)

2002 arXiv
[110]

Petean:The Yamabe invariant of simply connected manifolds, J

J. Petean:The Yamabe invariant of simply connected manifolds, J. reine und angew. Math. 523, 225–231 (2000)

2000
[111]

Pedersen, Y.-S

H. Pedersen, Y.-S. Poon:A note on rigidity of 3-Sasakian manifolds, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 127 (1999), no. 10, 3027–3034 55

1999
[112]

Podest` a, A

F. Podest` a, A. Spiro:On moduli spaces of Ricci solitons, J. Geom. Anal. 25 (2), 1157—1174 (2015)

2015
[113]

Schwahn:Stability of Einstein metrics on symmetric spaces of compact type, Ann

P. Schwahn:Stability of Einstein metrics on symmetric spaces of compact type, Ann. Glob. Anal. Geom. 61, 333–357 (2022)

2022
[114]

Schwahn:Coindex and Rigidity of Einstein Metrics on Homogeneous Gray Manifolds, J

P. Schwahn:Coindex and Rigidity of Einstein Metrics on Homogeneous Gray Manifolds, J. Geom. Anal. 32, 302 (2022)

2022
[115]

Schwahn, U

P. Schwahn, U. Semmelmann, G. Weingart:Stability of the non-symmetric space E7/PSO(8), Adv. Math. 432, Paper No. 109268 (2023)

2023
[116]

Schwahn:The Lichnerowicz Laplacian on normal homogeneous spaces, J

P. Schwahn:The Lichnerowicz Laplacian on normal homogeneous spaces, J. Reine Angew. Math. 814, 91–11 (2024)

2024
[117]

Semmelmann, C

U. Semmelmann, C. Wang, M. Y.-K. Wang:On the linear stability of nearly K¨ ahler6-manifolds, Ann. Global Anal. Geom. 57, no. 1, 15-22, (2020)

2020
[118]

Semmelmann, C

U. Semmelmann, C. Wang, M. Y.-K. Wang:Linear instability of Sasaki Einstein and nearly parallelG 2 manifolds, Internat. J. Math. 33, no. 6, Paper No. 2250042, 17 pp., (2022)

2022
[119]

Semmelmann, G

U. Semmelmann, G. Weingart:The standard Laplace operator, manuscripta math. 158, 273–293 (2018)

2018
[120]

Semmelmann, G

U. Semmelmann, G. Weingart:Stability of compact symmetric spaces, J. Geom. Anal. 32, no. 4, Paper No. 137, 27 pp., (2022)

2022
[121]

Sol´ e-Farr´ e:The Hitchin index in cohomogeneity one nearly K¨ ahler structures, https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.21106(2024)

E. Sol´ e-Farr´ e:The Hitchin index in cohomogeneity one nearly K¨ ahler structures, https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.21106(2024)

2024 arXiv
[122]

Stolz:Positive Scalar Curvature – Constructions and Obstructions, in: M

S. Stolz:Positive Scalar Curvature – Constructions and Obstructions, in: M. L. Gromov, H. B. Lawson (eds.),Perspectives in Scalar CurvatureVol. II, 5–49, World Scientific (2023)

2023
[123]

Tian:On Calabi’s conjecture for complex surfaces with positive first Chern class, Invent

G. Tian:On Calabi’s conjecture for complex surfaces with positive first Chern class, Invent. Math. 101 (1), 101–172 (1990)

1990
[124]

Tian:K-Stability and K¨ ahler-Einstein Metrics, Comm

G. Tian:K-Stability and K¨ ahler-Einstein Metrics, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 68 (7), 1085–1156 (2015)

2015
[125]

Wang:Stability of Riemannian manifolds with Killing spinors, Internat

C. Wang:Stability of Riemannian manifolds with Killing spinors, Internat. J. Math. 28, no. 1, 1750005, 19 pp. (2017)

2017
[126]

C. Wang, M. Y. Wang:Stability of Einstein metrics on fiber bundles, J. Geom. Anal. 31, no. 1, 490–515 (2021)

2021
[127]

C. Wang, M. Y. Wang:Instability of some Riemannian manifolds with real Killing spinors, Comm. Anal. Geom. 30, no. 8, 1895–1931 (2022) 56

2022
[128]

M. Y. Wang, W. Ziller:On normal homogeneous Einstein manifolds, Ann. Sci. ´Ecole Norm. Sup. 18, 563–633 (1985)

1985
[129]

M. Y. Wang, W. Ziller:Existence and nonexistence of homogeneous Einstein metrics, Invent. math. 84, 177–194 (1986)

1986
[130]

M. Y. Wang, W. Ziller:Einstein metrics on principal torus bundles, J. Diff. Geom. 31, 215–248 (1990)

1990
[131]

M. Y. Wang:Preserving Parallel Spinors under Metric Deformations, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 40 (3), 815–844 (1991)

1991
[132]

J. A. Wolf:The geometry and structure of isotropy irreducible homogeneous spaces, Acta Math. 120, 59–148 (1968) 57

1968

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [58]

Homma, U

Y. Homma, U. Semmelmann:Eigenvalue estimates and stability on positive quaternion K¨ ahler manifolds,https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.01333(2026)

work page arXiv 2026

[2] [1]

Alexandrov, U

B. Alexandrov, U. Semmelmann:Deformations of nearly parallelG 2-structures, Asian J. Math. 16 (4), 713–744 (2012)

2012

[3] [2]

Ammann, K

B. Ammann, K. Kr¨ oncke, H. Weiss, F. Witt:Holonomy rigidity for Ricci-flat metrics, Math. Z. 291, 303–311 (2019)

2019

[4] [3]

M. T. Anderson:A survey of Einstein metrics on 4-manifolds,https://arxiv. org/abs/0810.4830

work page Pith review arXiv

[5] [4]

Andersson, V

L. Andersson, V. Moncrief:Einstein spaces as attractors for the Einstein flow, J. Differential Geom. 89, no. 1, 1–47 (2011)

2011

[6] [5]

B¨ ar:Real Killing spinors and holonomy, Comm

C. B¨ ar:Real Killing spinors and holonomy, Comm. Math. Phys. 154, no. 3, 509– 521 (1993)

1993

[7] [6]

Batat, S

W. Batat, S. J. Hall, T. Murphy:Destabilising compact warped product Einstein manifolds, Comm. Anal. Geom. 29 (5), 1061–1094 (2021)

2021

[8] [7]

Batat, S

W. Batat, S. J. Hall, T. Murphy, J. Waldron:Rigidity ofSU n-type symmetric spaces, Internat. Math. Research Notices 2024 (3), 2066–2098 (2024)

2024