Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links
Paper Citation Record · LEDGER
REPRO-Bench: Can Agentic AI Systems Assess the Reproducibility of Social Science Research?
As of 13 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 9 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2507.18901.
A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.
Coverage vector
One-hop event checks from named stored sources.
Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00
Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-02T16:27:43.416081Z
A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.
Source: arxiv_reference, observed 2026-07-04T16:49:57.799465Z
Reference resolution
0 of 0 outbound references displayed
- verified exact0
- verified fuzzy0
- unresolved0
- parse uncertain0
- malformed identifier0
- metadata mismatch0
External citation measurements
No source-named external measurement is stored.
Outbound references
No outbound reference observations are available for this paper version.
Pith citing papers
Observation 5be141c4-ce6b-4144-8d01-f5f93e41ed19 · inbound
Automating Computational Reproducibility in Social Science: Comparing Prompt-Based and Agent-Based Approaches cites this paper.
Automating Computational Reproducibility in Social Science: Comparing Prompt-Based and Agent-Based Approaches REPRO-Bench: Can Agentic AI Systems Assess the Reproducibility of Social Science Research?
Reference 16
- Resolution
- verified exact
- arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-16T05:57:24.427600Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.
Observation f2f5e657-c8bd-42f2-a65f-e77a9cf33998 · inbound
Evaluating LLM Agents on Automated Software Analysis Tasks cites this paper.
Evaluating LLM Agents on Automated Software Analysis Tasks REPRO-Bench: Can Agentic AI Systems Assess the Reproducibility of Social Science Research?
Reference 27
- Resolution
- verified exact
- arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-11T08:26:01.463800Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.
Observation 5559c47e-6989-46c1-ae14-2bb1fbbfa186 · inbound
Evaluating LLM Agents on Automated Software Analysis Tasks cites this paper.
Evaluating LLM Agents on Automated Software Analysis Tasks REPRO-Bench: Can Agentic AI Systems Assess the Reproducibility of Social Science Research?
Reference 27
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T16:27:43.416081Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 16baa584-cb83-4130-bdaf-d2f614ca7697 · inbound
How to Interpret Agent Behavior cites this paper.
How to Interpret Agent Behavior REPRO-Bench: Can Agentic AI Systems Assess the Reproducibility of Social Science Research?
Reference 17
- Resolution
- verified exact
- arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-14T18:29:22.767619Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.
Observation 642998c8-295b-4c14-9c13-5bdacf0b66e9 · inbound
An Agentic Approach Towards Replication Package Quality Evaluation cites this paper.
An Agentic Approach Towards Replication Package Quality Evaluation REPRO-Bench: Can Agentic AI Systems Assess the Reproducibility of Social Science Research?
Reference 2025
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T12:35:18.951851Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation fd73d74d-319b-4d83-9cfa-2d2ea70e16ba · inbound
NatureBench: Can Coding Agents Match the Published SOTA of Nature-Family Papers? cites this paper.
NatureBench: Can Coding Agents Match the Published SOTA of Nature-Family Papers? REPRO-Bench: Can Agentic AI Systems Assess the Reproducibility of Social Science Research?
Reference 32
- Resolution
- verified exact
- arxiv_id, observed 2026-07-04T16:49:57.801054Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.
Observation 0bbd57d4-c287-433a-b654-be9e226f1263 · inbound
NatureBench: Can Coding Agents Match the Published SOTA of Nature-Family Papers? cites this paper.
NatureBench: Can Coding Agents Match the Published SOTA of Nature-Family Papers? REPRO-Bench: Can Agentic AI Systems Assess the Reproducibility of Social Science Research?
Reference 32
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-07-12T12:32:39.706055Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 6e67bed1-bb1e-413d-8b8e-af075f73cef3 · inbound
Towards Autonomous and Auditable Medical Imaging Model Development cites this paper.
Towards Autonomous and Auditable Medical Imaging Model Development REPRO-Bench: Can Agentic AI Systems Assess the Reproducibility of Social Science Research?
Reference 18
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-07-14T11:05:51.130839Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation ea61383b-0b24-4a1e-872e-0305c8279d56 · inbound
Towards Autonomous and Auditable Medical Imaging Model Development cites this paper.
Towards Autonomous and Auditable Medical Imaging Model Development REPRO-Bench: Can Agentic AI Systems Assess the Reproducibility of Social Science Research?
Reference 19
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-07-14T11:05:51.130839Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.