Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 53 references

Population dynamics under random switching

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Invasion rates of rare species decide whether randomly switched populations persist or go extinct.

desk verdict Serious extension of PDMP persistence to non-compact state spaces; main theorems plausible, but one proof step needs patching and the 'sharp' claim overreaches. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.19615 v1 pith:NZL7UPWS submitted 2025-07-25 math.PR q-bio.PE

Alexandru Hening , Siddharth Sabharwal This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.PRq-bio.PE MSC 92D2537H1560J0560J99
keywords KolmogorovsystempiecewisedeterministicMarkovprocessstochasticpersistenceextinctioninvasionrateLyapunovexponentrandomenvironmentergodicinvariantmeasure
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks when populations that live in randomly switching environments coexist and when they die out. The authors model the environment as a finite-state Markov chain that flips the differential equations governing n interacting species, and they give sharp conditions for persistence versus extinction. The conditions are stated entirely in terms of invasion rates, the average per-capita growth a species would experience when rare, computed against the ergodic measures that live on the boundary where some species are absent. If every boundary measure is repelled by at least one species, the full community persists; if some boundary face attracts, the species outside it go extinct with controlled probability. The same invasion-rate criterion also yields, under an extra reachability condition, exponential convergence of the process to a unique invariant distribution.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the Lyapunov function $V(x,k) = F(x,k)/\prod_{i=1}^n x_i^{p_i}$ with weights $p_i$ chosen by the minmax principle so that the weighted sum of invasion rates is strictly positive for every boundary ergodic measure. A contraction inequality of the form $\mathbb{E}_{x,k} V^\theta(X(n^*T^*), r(n^*T^*)) \leq \kappa V^\theta(x,k) + \tilde K$ for a fixed time grid is the mechanism: it forces the process away from the boundary and, together with the strong law of large numbers for the switching martingales, yields stochastic persistence and, under Assumption 2.4, exponential mixing. The extinction side uses a dual family $U_\theta$ built from positive weights on the surviving species and negative weights on the vanishing ones, turning the boundary face into an absorbing supermartingale trap. Assumption 2.2, the bounded-ratio condition on $F$, is what makes the martingale strong laws available in the non-compact setting.

What would settle it

For a two-species competitive Lotka-Volterra PDMP, choose parameters with both invasion rates positive, so Assumption 2.3 holds, and simulate the process from initial conditions extremely close to each boundary; the theorem predicts the occupation measure stays away from the boundary with probability arbitrarily close to one and, under the bracket condition, converges to a unique interior law, so a long simulation showing accumulation near either boundary face would contradict the theorem.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that for an n-dimensional Kolmogorov piecewise deterministic Markov process, the long-term fate of the community is governed by the external Lyapunov exponents, called invasion rates, of the ergodic probability measures supported on the boundary of the positive orthant. Theorem 2.1 states that under Assumptions 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3, the process is stochastically persistent in probability and almost surely stochastically persistent; if Assumption 2.4 also holds, transition probabilities converge exponentially fast in total variation to a unique invariant probability measure on the interior of the positive orthant, and time averages converge for every integrable function. The extinction results complement this: a boundary subspace whose missing species have negative invasion rates acts as an attractor, and the process converges to it with probability one when the subspace is accessible, or with high probability when the process starts nearby. The theory is applied to competitive, predator-prey, single-species, and food-chain models, where the invasion rates can often be computed explicitly.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the environment-dependent Lyapunov functions $F(x,k)$ stay within a fixed multiplicative factor of one another for all population densities; without this bound, the strong law of large numbers for the switching martingales is not available, and the authors show that rock-paper-scissors dynamics fall outside the theory.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For two-species competitive Lotka-Volterra models, the signs of the two invasion rates classify coexistence, bistability, and winner-take-all dynamics, recovering and extending earlier two-dimensional results.
  • For predator-prey models, the sign of the predator's invasion rate into the prey-only measure decides whether predators persist or are driven to extinction.
  • For a single species that grows in one environment and decays in another, switching can stabilize an otherwise exploding or declining population; persistence holds exactly when the invasion rate $\lambda(\delta_0\times\nu)$ is positive, and an explicit invariant density is available.
  • In food chains, persistence of the whole chain is determined inductively by the signs of invasion rates $\lambda_{k+1}(\mu_{I_k})$; the first negative rate marks the level above which species go extinct.
  • Under Assumption 2.4, the model is exponentially ergodic, so long-run empirical averages of any integrable observable converge to the unique interior invariant law $\pi^*$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The bounded-ratio Assumption 2.2 is sufficient for the martingale strong laws used in the proofs, but a direct verification of the strong law for specific models might allow the same classification to work when that ratio bound fails.
  • The paper explicitly excludes rock-paper-scissors dynamics because they violate Assumption 2.2, suggesting that cyclic competitive dominance requires a different aggregate quantity than a single weighted sum of invasion rates.
  • The invasion-rate criterion could be turned into a numerical screening tool: estimate boundary ergodic measures from short simulations, compute invasion rates, and predict persistence or extinction for a given switching model.
  • Because convergence to $\pi^*$ is exponentially fast in total variation, statistical inference about species abundances under random switching could be based on the invariant law alone, without tracking the switching path.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops persistence and extinction theory for n-dimensional Kolmogorov piecewise deterministic Markov processes (PDMP) with finite-state random switching. The main result, Theorem 2.1, states that under Assumptions 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3 the process is stochastically persistent in probability and almost surely stochastically persistent, and that under the additional strong bracket condition (Assumption 2.4) transition probabilities converge exponentially fast in total variation to a unique invariant probability measure on the positive orthant. Section 6 provides complementary extinction theorems for attracting boundary subspaces. The paper also contains a substantial applications section covering competitive Lotka-Volterra systems, predator-prey models, single-species stability versus explosion, three-dimensional competition, and Lotka-Volterra food chains.

Significance. If the results are correct, this is a genuinely useful extension of stochastic persistence theory: it moves from compact-state and low-dimensional PDMP settings to nonlinear Kolmogorov systems on noncompact state spaces, with conditions expressed through invasion rates of boundary ergodic measures. The applications are nontrivial and include explicit invariant densities for the single-species model, which gives the paper concrete value beyond the general theorems. The authors are also explicit about the scope of Assumption 2.2, noting in Remark 3.16 that rock-paper-scissors dynamics are excluded. The proof structure follows the established Hening-Nguyen/Benaïm Lyapunov-function framework, and the minmax reformulation of Assumption 2.3 is a useful device. However, as detailed below, the key limiting step in Lemma 5.1 is not justified as written, and the analogous argument in Lemma 6.2 inherits the same gap. Since these lemmas are load-bearing for the main persistence and extinction theorems, the paper needs a revision before it can be accepted.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 5, Lemma 5.1 (Eqs. (5.7)-(5.10))]
  2. [Section 6, Lemma 6.2 (Eqs. (6.6)-(6.7))]
minor comments (5)
  1. [Proposition 5.1, Eq. (5.20)]
  2. [Proof of Lemma 5.1]
  3. [Proposition 5.1, proof]
  4. [Section 6, after Eq. (6.61)]
  5. [References]

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the persistence theorem is derived from the external invasion-rate hypothesis, and the only flagged concern is a proof gap in Lemma 5.1, which is a rigor issue rather than a circular reduction.

full rationale

I walked the derivation chain for Theorem 2.1. Assumption 2.3 (positive invasion rates on the boundary) is an external hypothesis; the minmax weights p are obtained from the compact set M of boundary ergodic measures via cited external results (Schreiber et al. 2011, Benaim 2023), not from the desired conclusion. The Lyapunov function V = F / prod x_i^{p_i} is constructed from those weights, and the drift estimate in Lemma 5.1 is proved by contradiction: any invariant limit measure mu on the boundary would give sum_i p_i lambda_i(mu) >= 2 rho*, contradicting Assumption 2.3. This is a genuine implication, not a restatement of the assumption. The self-citations (Hening-Nguyen 2018, Hening et al. 2021, Benaim 2023) are methodological or for auxiliary technical lemmas such as Lemma 4.5; none of them supplies the persistence theorem itself, and no uniqueness theorem from the authors' prior work is used to forbid alternatives. The only in-scope concern I found is the skeptical gap: Lemma 5.1 applies Lemma 4.4 to Phi without explicitly verifying the growth bound |Phi| <= K F^delta (1 + f_M), so the displayed limit step in the proof of (5.7) is unsupported as written. That is a missing justification in the proof, but it is not circular: Phi is not defined in terms of the conclusion, and the gap does not make the theorem equivalent to its inputs. Likewise, Remark 3.16's exclusion of rock-paper-scissors dynamics is an explicit scope limitation, not a masked assumption. I therefore find no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted parameters and no new physical or biological entities. Its central claim rests on standard stochastic analysis and on domain-specific structural facts about PDMPs taken from prior literature, especially the finiteness of boundary ergodic measures and petite-set conditions under Hörmander-type assumptions.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Existence, uniqueness, and Markov-Feller property of PDMP solutions (Benaïm et al. 2015).
    Used in Lemma 4.1 and throughout Section 4 to justify strong solutions and the Feller property.
  • domain assumption The set of ergodic invariant probability measures on the boundary is finite (Benaïm 2023).
    Used to apply the minmax principle and to define the finite set M over which Assumption 2.3 is checked.
  • domain assumption Minmax principle for persistence weights (Schreiber et al. 2011, Benaïm 2023).
    Converts Assumption 2.3 into existence of positive weights p used to build the Lyapunov function V.
  • domain assumption Under the strong bracket condition (2.14), the PDMP is irreducible and every compact set is petite (Benaïm et al. 2015).
    Needed in Theorem 5.1 and Claim 5.3 to obtain exponential convergence to a unique invariant measure via Meyn-Tweedie.
  • standard math Standard probability results: Birkhoff ergodic theorem, Doob inequality, Borel-Cantelli, Gronwall, Meyn-Tweedie stability criteria.
    Used in the proofs of Lemmas 4.3, 6.3, 6.4, and Claim 5.3.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Population dynamics under random switching." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NZL7UPWS

@misc{pith2026250719615,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Population dynamics under random switching},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NZL7UPWS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.19615}
}
abstract

Populations interact non-linearly and are influenced by environmental fluctuations. In order to have realistic mathematical models, one needs to take into account that the environmental fluctuations are inherently stochastic. Often, environmental stochasticity is modeled by systems of stochastic differential equations. However, this type of stochasticity is not always the best suited for ecological modeling. Instead, biological systems can be modeled using piecewise deterministic Markov processes (PDMP). For a PDMP the process follows the flow of a system of ordinary differential equations for a random time, after which the environment switches to a different state, where the dynamics is given by a different system of differential equations. Then this is repeated. The current paper is devoted to the study of the dynamics of $n$ populations described by $n$-dimensional Kolmogorov PDMP. We provide sharp conditions for persistence and extinction, based on the invasion rates (Lyapunov exponents) of the ergodic probability measures supported on the boundary of the positive orthant. In order to showcase the applicability of our results, we apply the theory in some interesting ecological examples.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.19615 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. This is a sample path of the process (X(t), r(t)) from 3.3 , with the coefficients, a1(1) = 0.5, a1(2) = 1, and b1(2) = 0.05. The switching rates q12 = q21 = 2, and X(0) = 1. In this setting λ(δ0 × ν) > 0. (a) λ(δ0 × ν) < 0 (b) λ(δ0 × ν) > 0 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The figures shown here have sample paths for the process (X(t), r(t)) governed by 3.3 when a1(2) < 0. On the left we have the sample path corresponding to coefficients a1(1) = 0.5, a1(2) = −0.505 and b1(2) = 0.05, making λ(δ0×ν) < 0. On the right we see the sample path for the coefficients a1(1) = 0.5, a1(2) = 0.45 and b1(2) = 0.05, making λ(δ0 × ν) > 0. For both plots we have taken the switching rates q12 = q21 = 2… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The figures show 100 sample paths of the process from (3.31) with tmax = 5000. On the left, the initial condition is (X1(0), X2(0)) = (1, 1), and we see that the sample paths tend to concentrate away from the boundary, showing the persistence of species. On the right, the initial condition chosen is (50, 100), the sample paths start away from the boundary, but they concen￾trate near the x axis, showing extinction of… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Invariant densities for dynamical systems with random switching

    Yuri Bakhtin and Tobias Hurth. Invariant densities for dynamical systems with random switching. Nonlinearity, 25 0 (10): 0 2937, 2012

    work page 2012

  2. [2]

    Regularity of invariant densities for 1d systems with random switching

    Yuri Bakhtin, Tobias Hurth, and Jonathan C Mattingly. Regularity of invariant densities for 1d systems with random switching. Nonlinearity, 28 0 (11): 0 3755, 2015

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    Smooth invariant densities for random switching on the torus

    Yuri Bakhtin, Tobias Hurth, Sean D Lawley, and Jonathan C Mattingly. Smooth invariant densities for random switching on the torus. Nonlinearity, 31 0 (4): 0 1331, 2018

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    Bena \" m

    M. Bena \" m. Stochastic persistence. 2023. preprint

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    m and C. Lobry. L otka-- V olterra with randomly fluctuating environments or “how switching between beneficial environments can make survival harder

    M. Bena \" m and C. Lobry. L otka-- V olterra with randomly fluctuating environments or “how switching between beneficial environments can make survival harder”. Ann. Appl. Probab., 0 (6): 0 3754--3785, 2016

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Bena \" m and S

    M. Bena \" m and S. J. Schreiber. Persistence of structured populations in random environments. Theoretical Population Biology, 76 0 (1): 0 19--34, 2009

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    Bena \" m, J

    M. Bena \" m, J. Hofbauer, and W. H. Sandholm. Robust permanence and impermanence for stochastic replicator dynamics. Journal of Biological Dynamics, 2 0 (2): 0 180--195, 2008

    work page 2008

  8. [8]

    Bena \" m, S

    M. Bena \" m, S. Le Borgne, F. Malrieu, and P. A. Zitt. Qualitative properties of certain piecewise deterministic M arkov processes. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré Probab. Stat., 51 0 (3): 0 1040--1075, 2015

    work page 2015

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    Persistence and extinction for stochastic ecological models with internal and external variables

    Michel Bena \" m and Sebastian J Schreiber. Persistence and extinction for stochastic ecological models with internal and external variables. Journal of mathematical biology, 79 0 (1): 0 393--431, 2019

    2019

  2. [10]

    Random switching between vector fields having a common zero

    Michel Bena \" m and Edouard Strickler. Random switching between vector fields having a common zero. The Annals of Applied Probability, 29 0 (1): 0 326--375, 2019

    2019

  3. [11]

    Supports of invariant measures for piecewise deterministic markov processes

    Michel Bena \" m, Fritz Colonius, and Ralph Lettau. Supports of invariant measures for piecewise deterministic markov processes. Nonlinearity, 30 0 (9): 0 3400, 2017

    2017

  4. [12]

    Blath, A

    J. Blath, A. Etheridge, and M. Meredith. Coexistence in locally regulated competing populations and survival of branching annihilating random walk. Ann. Appl. Probab., 17 0 (5-6): 0 1474--1507, 2007. ISSN 1050-5164

    2007

  5. [13]

    Persistence in randomly switched lotka-volterra food chains

    Antoine Bourquin. Persistence in randomly switched lotka-volterra food chains. ESAIM: Probability and Statistics, 27: 0 324--344, 2023

    2023

  6. [14]

    Cattiaux and S

    P. Cattiaux and S. M \'e l \'e ard. Competitive or weak cooperative stochastic L otka-- V olterra systems conditioned on non-extinction. J. Math. Biol., 60 0 (6): 0 797--829, 2010

    2010

  7. [15]

    Cattiaux, P

    P. Cattiaux, P. Collet, A. Lambert, S. Mart \' nez, S. M \'e l \'e ard, and J. San Mart \' n. Quasi-stationary distributions and diffusion models in population dynamics. Ann. Probab., 37 0 (5): 0 1926--1969, 2009

    1926

  8. [16]

    P. Chesson. General theory of competitive coexistence in spatially-varying environments. Theoretical Population Biology, 58 0 (3): 0 211--237, 2000

    2000

  9. [17]

    P. L. Chesson and S. Ellner. Invasibility and stochastic boundedness in monotonic competition models. J. Math. Biol., 27 0 (2): 0 117--138, 1989

    1989

  10. [18]

    The stabilizing effect of a random environment

    Peter L Chesson. The stabilizing effect of a random environment. Journal of Mathematical Biology, 15: 0 1--36, 1982

    1982

  11. [19]

    N. H. Dang, N. H. Du, and G. Yin. Existence of stationary distributions for K olmogorov systems of competitive type under telegraph noise. J. Differential Equations, 257 0 (6): 0 386--409, 2014

    2014

  12. [20]

    Piecewise-deterministic markov processes: A general class of non-diffusion stochastic models

    Mark HA Davis. Piecewise-deterministic markov processes: A general class of non-diffusion stochastic models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 46 0 (3): 0 353--376, 1984

    1984

  13. [21]

    Asymptotic behavior of kolmogorov systems with predator-prey type in random environment

    Nguyen Huu Du, Nguyen Hai Dang, and Wei Feng. Asymptotic behavior of kolmogorov systems with predator-prey type in random environment. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 13 0 (6), 2014

    2014

  14. [22]

    S. N. Ethier and T. G. Kurtz. Markov processes: characterization and convergence, volume 282. John Wiley & Sons, 2009

    2009

  15. [23]

    S. N. Evans, P. L. Ralph, S. J. Schreiber, and A. Sen. Stochastic population growth in spatially heterogeneous environments. J. Math. Biol., 66 0 (3): 0 423--476, 2013

    2013

  16. [24]

    S. N. Evans, A. Hening, and S. J. Schreiber. Protected polymorphisms and evolutionary stability of patch-selection strategies in stochastic environments. J. Math. Biol., 71 0 (2): 0 325--359, 2015. ISSN 0303-6812

    2015

  17. [25]

    Stochastic extinction, an average lyapunov function approach

    Juraj Foldes and Declan Stacy. Stochastic extinction, an average lyapunov function approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.19606, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Ergodic properties of markov processes

    Martin Hairer. Ergodic properties of markov processes. Lecture notes, 2006

    2006

  19. [27]

    Alexandru Hening and Dang H. Nguyen. Coexistence and extinction for stochastic Kolmogorov systems . The Annals of Applied Probability, 28 0 (3): 0 1893 -- 1942, 2018. doi:10.1214/17-AAP1347. URL https://doi.org/10.1214/17-AAP1347

    1942 doi

  20. [28]

    The competitive exclusion principle in stochastic environments

    Alexandru Hening and Dang H Nguyen. The competitive exclusion principle in stochastic environments. Journal of mathematical biology, 80: 0 1323--1351, 2020

    2020

  21. [29]

    On a predator-prey system with random switching that never converges to its equilibrium

    Alexandru Hening and Edouard Strickler. On a predator-prey system with random switching that never converges to its equilibrium. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 51 0 (5): 0 3625--3640, 2019

    2019

  22. [30]

    A general theory of coexistence and extinction for stochastic ecological communities

    Alexandru Hening, Dang H Nguyen, and Peter Chesson. A general theory of coexistence and extinction for stochastic ecological communities. Journal of Mathematical Biology, 82 0 (6): 0 56, 2021

    2021

  23. [31]

    A classification of the dynamics of three-dimensional stochastic ecological systems

    Alexandru Hening, Dang H Nguyen, and Sebastian J Schreiber. A classification of the dynamics of three-dimensional stochastic ecological systems. The Annals of Applied Probability, 52 0 (6): 0 893--931, 2022

    2022

  24. [32]

    Random switching in an ecosystem with two prey and one predator

    Alexandru Hening, Dang H Nguyen, Nhu Nguyen, and Harrison Watts. Random switching in an ecosystem with two prey and one predator. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 55 0 (1): 0 347--366, 2023

    2023

  25. [33]

    Hofbauer

    J. Hofbauer. A general cooperation theorem for hypercycles. Monatsh. Math., 91 0 (3): 0 233--240, 1981

    1981

  26. [34]

    Hofbauer and J

    J. Hofbauer and J. W-H So. Uniform persistence and repellors for maps. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 107 0 (4): 0 1137--1142, 1989

    1989

  27. [35]

    Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics

    Josef Hofbauer and Karl Sigmund. Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics. Cambridge University Press, 1998

    1998

  28. [36]

    V. Hutson. A theorem on average L iapunov functions. Monatsh. Math., 98 0 (4): 0 267--275, 1984

    1984

  29. [37]

    Foundations of Modern Probability

    O Kallenberg. Foundations of Modern Probability. Springer, 2021

    2021

  30. [38]

    Khasminskii

    R. Khasminskii. Stochastic stability of differential equations, volume 66 of Stochastic Modelling and Applied Probability. Springer, Heidelberg, second edition, 2012. With contributions by G. N. Milstein and M. B. Nevelson

    2012

  31. [39]

    It \^o ’s stochastic calculus: its surprising power for applications

    Hiroshi Kunita. It \^o ’s stochastic calculus: its surprising power for applications. Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 120 0 (5): 0 622--652, 2010

    2010

  32. [40]

    Lande, S

    R. Lande, S. Engen, and B.-E. Saether. Stochastic population dynamics in ecology and conservation. Oxford University Press on Demand, 2003

    2003

  33. [41]

    A strong law of large numbers for local martingales

    R Sh Liptser. A strong law of large numbers for local martingales. Stochastics, 3 0 (1-4): 0 217--228, 1980

    1980

  34. [42]

    Contribution to the theory of periodic reactions

    Alfred J Lotka. Contribution to the theory of periodic reactions. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 14 0 (3): 0 271--274, 1910

    1910

  35. [43]

    X. Mao. Stochastic differential equations and their applications. Horwood Publishing Series in Mathematics & Applications. Horwood Publishing Limited, Chichester, 1997

    1997

  36. [44]

    S. P. Meyn and R. L. Tweedie. Stability of M arkovian processes. I . criteria for discrete-time chains. Adv. in Appl. Probab., 24 0 (3): 0 542--574, 1992

    1992

  37. [45]

    Mierczy \'n ski, W

    J. Mierczy \'n ski, W. Shen, and X.-Q. Zhao. Uniform persistence for nonautonomous and random parabolic kolmogorov systems. Journal of Differential Equations, 204 0 (2): 0 471--510, 2004

    2004

  38. [46]

    S. J. Schreiber and J. O. Lloyd-Smith. Invasion dynamics in spatially heterogeneous environments. The American Naturalist, 174 0 (4): 0 490--505, 2009

    2009

  39. [47]

    S. J. Schreiber, M. Bena \" m, and K. A. S. Atchad \'e . Persistence in fluctuating environments. J. Math. Biol., 62 0 (5): 0 655--683, 2011

    2011

  40. [48]

    H. L. Smith and H. R. Thieme. Dynamical systems and population persistence, volume 118. American Mathematical Society Providence, RI, 2011

    2011

  41. [49]

    H. R. Thieme. Uniform persistence and permanence for non-autonomous semiflows in population biology. Mathematical Biosciences, 166 0 (2): 0 173--201, 2000

    2000

  42. [50]

    M. Turelli. Random environments and stochastic calculus. Theoretical Population Biology, 12 0 (2): 0 140--178, 1977

    1977

  43. [51]

    Variations and fluctuations of the number of individuals in animal species living together

    Vito Volterra. Variations and fluctuations of the number of individuals in animal species living together. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 3 0 (1): 0 3--51, 1928

    1928

  44. [52]

    Lotka-volterra population models

    Peter J Wangersky. Lotka-volterra population models. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 9: 0 189--218, 1978

    1978

  45. [53]

    G Yin and . Zhou, C. Hybrid switching diffusions: Properties and applications, 2010

    2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.