Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 61 references

Dependability Theory-based Statistical QoS Provisioning of Fluid Antenna Systems

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper derives closed-form expressions for the level-crossing rate and average fade duration of an N-port fluid antenna system over Nakagami-m fading, then builds mission reliability, mission effective capacity, and mission effective…

desk verdict Theorem 1 has an exponent error for m>1 that invalidates the core LCR result; the paper needs major correction before it can be trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.19984 v1 pith:MSOB5JUR submitted 2025-07-26 eess.SP

Irfan Muhammad , Priyadarshi Mukherjee , Wee Kiat New , Hirley Alves , Ioannis Krikidis , Kai-Kit Wong This is my paper · ORCID
classification eess.SP
keywords fluidantennasystemslevel-crossingrateaveragefadedurationNakagami-mfadingmissionreliabilityeffectivecapacityfiniteblocklengthURLLC
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to add the time dimension to fluid antenna system (FAS) analysis. For an N-port FAS over Nakagami-m fading, it derives closed-form expressions for the level-crossing rate and average fade duration, which describe how often the selected best port dips below a threshold and how long such dips last. On top of these second-order statistics, it defines dependability metrics for mission-critical industrial IoT: mission reliability, mean time to first failure, mission effective capacity under finite blocklength, and mission effective energy efficiency. The paper argues these metrics reveal trade-offs among port count, antenna region width, SNR, QoS exponent, and mission duration, and it gives a modified Dinkelbach algorithm to maximize energy efficiency under a mission reliability constraint. If the formulas are right, FAS designers can quantify outage dynamics rather than only average performance.

What carries the argument

The argument rides on Rice's level-crossing integral applied to the joint density (6): the N port envelopes are modeled as N−1 bivariate Nakagami-m densities sharing port 1 as the reference, with correlation coefficients given by J0(2π(k−1)W/(N−1)). Envelope time derivatives are zero-mean Gaussian with variance determined by the Doppler frequency and Nakagami parameter m, which turns the LCR into an integral of that joint density, and Marcum-Q identities collapse the integrals into the closed forms (12) and (17). The optimization machinery is a Dinkelbach transform with an embedded golden-section line search, which handles the non-convex fractional program for mEEE maximization.

What would settle it

Run Monte Carlo simulations or channel measurements of an N-port FAS over Nakagami-m fading with correlation coefficients µ_k = J0(2π(k−1)W/(N−1)), and compare the empirical level-crossing rate and average fade duration at several thresholds against (12) and (17) for a range of N and m values. A systematic mismatch beyond Monte Carlo error would falsify the formulas; alternatively, estimate the joint distribution of the port envelopes directly and test whether it equals the product form (6).

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 1: for an N-port FAS with Nakagami-m fading, the level-crossing rate is the closed-form expression (12), and the average fade duration is the ratio of the joint CDF (7) to that LCR, giving (17). These are obtained from the joint density (6), where the N port envelopes are modeled as a product of N−1 bivariate Nakagami-m densities all tied to a reference port, and from the fact that envelope time derivatives are zero-mean Gaussian. From these statistics, the paper computes failure and repair rates, defines mission reliability as exp(−ΔT/MTTFF) with MTTFF = 1/Υ, and extends effective capacity to a finite-blocklength mission effective capacity that guarantees failure-free operation over a mission duration ΔT. The mission effective energy efficiency is then defined as mEC divided by total power consumption and maximized under a mission reliability constraint by a modified Dinkelbach algorithm with a golden-section line search. Numerical results report Monte Carlo agreement for the LCR and show that more ports and wider fluid regions improve reliability and energy efficiency, while mEEE eventually degrades as SNR grows.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the N port envelopes' joint distribution is exactly the product of N−1 bivariate Nakagami-m densities with port 1 as the reference, meaning all inter-port correlation passes through that one port; if real FAS channels carry additional correlation among non-reference ports or a different joint law, the LCR and AFD formulas and every dependability metric built on them would need to be reworked.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • LCR and AFD become computable in closed form as functions of port count N, fluid-region width W, Nakagami severity m, Doppler frequency, and threshold, so designers can predict outage frequency and duration at the design stage.
  • In the no-correlation limit the formulas reduce to conventional selection combining, while perfectly correlated ports make LCR and AFD independent of N; intermediate correlation is where FAS port diversity actually pays.
  • Mission reliability decays exponentially with mission duration under the constant-failure-rate model, so longer missions require more ports or a wider fluid region to hold the same reliability target.
  • mEEE is unimodal in average SNR, so an optimal operating SNR exists; beyond it, extra power only reduces energy efficiency, and the proposed algorithm finds that point under the reliability constraint.
  • Tighter delay constraints, captured by a larger QoS exponent θ, reduce mEEE, so ultra-reliable low-latency operation carries a measurable energy cost.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The exponential mission-reliability formula assumes a constant failure rate, meaning a memoryless time-to-first-failure; bursty or clustered fades in real channels could make short-mission failure probability higher than exp(−ΔT/MTTFF), so MTTFF alone may understate early risk.
  • Because the joint density (6) is assumed rather than derived from a physical antenna model, the metric framework would survive a better channel model but the closed forms would not; the same dependability machinery applies with any joint density inserted into Rice's integral.
  • The derivations should transplant to other fading laws, such as Rice, α-µ, or the block-correlation model mentioned in a footnote, by replacing the bivariate Nakagami-m density, yielding falsifiable predictions before hardware prototypes exist.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper proposes a dependability-theoretic framework for statistical QoS provisioning of fluid antenna systems over Nakagami-m fading. The authors derive closed-form expressions for the level-crossing rate and average fade duration of an N-port FAS, use these second-order statistics to define mission reliability and mean time-to-first-failure, and extend effective capacity to a mission-aware metric (mEC) in the finite blocklength regime. The mEC and a refined power-consumption model are combined into a mission effective energy efficiency (mEEE) metric, whose maximization is formulated as a non-convex fractional program and solved with a modified Dinkelbach algorithm. Numerical results illustrate trade-offs among port count, QoS exponent, SNR, and mission duration.

Significance. If correct, the LCR/AFD results would be the first second-order statistics for correlated Nakagami-m FAS and would enable dependability-aware design for URLLC/IIoT. The paper has notable strengths: the use of Rice's formula is standard, the limiting cases in Corollaries 1-6 are checked against known selection-combining results, the analytical expressions are explicit, and the optimization loop is described with a concrete algorithm. However, the central LCR formula contains a power-law inconsistency for general m, so the claimed Nakagami-m generality is not established as it stands. The downstream metrics and all numerical results for m>1 inherit this issue.

major comments (4)
  1. [Theorem 1, Eq. (12), Appendix A (43)] The second summand of (12) and the final line of (43) contain the factor x1^{3m-2} in the integrand. This exponent is inconsistent with the joint density (6). For an i>=2 term, the density contributes x1^{2m-1} from the marginal of port 1 and x1^{1-m} from the i-th bivariate factor; after integrating out the remaining N-2 ports, the x1^{1-m} prefactors cancel with the (x1)^{m-1} leading factor from the Bessel-function integral, leaving an x1^m integrand. The two exponents agree only for m=1. Concretely, for N=2 the correct expression derived in Appendix C from (45)-(46) has integrand x1^m and yields the low-threshold scaling L(xth) ~ xth^{4m-1}, while (12) with x1^{3m-2} yields ~ xth^{6m-3}. Thus (12) and (15)/(46) contradict each other for m>1. Since Fig. 3 validates only m=1, the general-m claim of Theorem 1 is unverified, and the downstream AFD (17), mission reliability (26), mEC (33), and mEEE results for m>1 inherit the error. The derivation must be corrected and re-validated for m>1.
  2. [Eq. (9), Eqs. (22)-(26)] The threshold used to define the failure state is inconsistent with the threshold used in the dependability metrics. In (9) the envelope threshold rho is defined through eta and Phi (presumably rho = sqrt(eta/Phi)), but in (22)-(26) the failure and repair rates are evaluated at xth = sqrt(eta): Upsilon = 1/r_n(sqrt(eta)) and beta = 1/r_f(sqrt(eta)). Unless Phi=1, these are different thresholds, and since Phi is varied in the numerical section, the mission reliability, MTTFF, mEC, and mEEE curves are evaluated at the wrong threshold. Please correct the threshold mapping and re-run the affected numerical results.
  3. [Eq. (33)] The mission effective capacity expression in (33) is stated without derivation. It is not apparent from the EC definition (27) or the Markov-source analysis (28)-(30) why the factor [1 - exp(-Delta T/MTTFF)(1 - exp(-theta n R))] appears inside the logarithm. Since mEC is the objective of the optimization problem (34) and is used to define mEEE, this is a load-bearing formula. Please provide a derivation or an explicit reference to the derivation in [35], together with the assumptions under which it holds (e.g., exponentially distributed time to failure and independence between the fading process and the arrival process).
  4. [Fig. 3, Figs. 4-7] The Monte Carlo validation in Fig. 3 covers only m=1 (Rayleigh fading), while the dependability and mEEE results in Figs. 4-7 use m=2, 4, and 5. In light of the exponent error in Theorem 1, the current numerical support does not establish the paper's claims for Nakagami-m fading. The revised LCR/AFD expressions must be validated with Monte Carlo simulations for representative m>1 and N>2 before the downstream metrics can be trusted.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Eq. (10)] The iteration index is denoted j in the formula and the text, but the stopping criterion refers to eta^(i) and eta^(i-1); please use a consistent index.
  2. [Eq. (45)] The factor (1 - u_2^2) in the denominator should be (1 - mu_2^2).
  3. [Eq. (47)] The symbol 'mu_2' in the argument of the gamma function should be 'mu_2' with proper Greek notation.
  4. [Algorithm 1, line 2] The line 'f(x,q) = P4' appears to be a placeholder; it should define the actual inner-loop objective used in (35).
  5. [Eq. (6) and channel model] The correlation model (6) is a product of N-1 bivariate Nakagami-m densities rather than a conventional N-variate distribution; a short discussion of the physical conditions under which this approximation is accurate would help readers assess the scope of the results.
  6. [Theorem 1 and Corollary 3] The term 'closed-form' in Theorem 1 is somewhat overstated because (12) still contains an integral and products of Marcum Q-functions; consider using 'analytical expression' instead.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity is found: the LCR/AFD derivation is self-contained, and the only self-citation overlap ([35]) is a non-load-bearing building-block definition.

full rationale

Theorem 1 is derived by substituting the joint Nakagami-m density (6), taken from [38], into Rice's formula (11) via the derivative-density identity (37) from [58], with the Gaussian derivative statistics (39) from [44] and the Marcum-Q integral identity from [59]; no fitted parameter is introduced, and the expression is validated against Monte Carlo simulation. The AFD (17) is the ratio of the joint CDF (7) to the LCR (12), exactly as prescribed by definition (16), so no input is disguised as an output. The later dependability metrics use mission reliability and mEC/mEEE definitions from [30], [35], [50], and [51] as external building blocks; the self-citation [35] supplies the definition of mission reliability and is not used to prove the new LCR/AFD formulas, so it is not load-bearing. The footnote in Section II-A explicitly defers the block-correlation model to future work, acknowledging the model limitation. A separate internal power-law inconsistency in (12) for general m is a correctness risk, not a circularity, because it does not make the prediction equal to its inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's results rest on a chain of standard results and modeling assumptions; the key assumptions are listed below. No numbers are fitted to data; the threshold eta is solved from a fixed-point equation, and spatial correlation is a Bessel-function model rather than a fitted parameter.

assumptions (7)
  • standard math Rice's formula for the level-crossing rate (11) assumes the joint PDF of the envelope and its time derivative exists and is integrable.
    Used in Section III-A as the starting point for Theorem 1.
  • domain assumption For isotropic scattering, the time derivative of the Nakagami-m envelope is zero-mean Gaussian with variance pi^2 sigma^2/m f_D^2 and is independent of the envelope.
    Invoked before Theorem 1, via [44], to reduce LCR to an integral of the joint envelope PDF.
  • domain assumption The joint PDF of the N FAS port envelopes is the product of bivariate Nakagami-m densities in (6), with port 1 as reference and conditional independence among other ports.
    Core channel model taken from [38]; the LCR derivation in Appendix A builds on (6).
  • domain assumption The fading is quasi-static block fading with perfect CSI at the receiver and instantaneous selection of the best port.
    System model in Section II; limits applicability to slowly varying channels.
  • domain assumption The channel is modeled as a two-state Gilbert-Elliott process, and the time to first failure is exponentially distributed with constant failure rate Upsilon, giving RM = exp(-Delta T / MTTFF).
    Used in Section III-D, Eqs. (25)-(26), following [50].
  • standard math The effective capacity and effective bandwidth large-deviations framework of [32] is valid, including the Markovian arrival model.
    Foundation for Section IV, Eqs. (27)-(30).
  • domain assumption The threshold for a failure event is the envelope level rho = sqrt(eta / Phi), where eta is the FBL SNR threshold from the fixed-point iteration (10).
    Defined in Section II-B; converts the FBL rate condition into an envelope threshold for the LCR/AFD analysis.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dependability Theory-based Statistical QoS Provisioning of Fluid Antenna Systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MSOB5JUR

@misc{pith2026250719984,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dependability Theory-based Statistical QoS Provisioning of Fluid Antenna Systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MSOB5JUR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.19984}
}
abstract

Fluid antenna systems (FAS) have recently emerged as a promising technology for next-generation wireless networks, offering real-time spatial reconfiguration to enhance reliability, throughput, and energy efficiency. Nevertheless, existing studies often overlook the temporal dynamics of channel fading and their implications for mission-critical operations. In this paper, we propose a dependability-theoretic framework for statistical quality-of-service (QoS) provisioning of FAS under finite blocklength (FBL) constraints. Specifically, we derive new closed-form expressions for the level-crossing rate (LCR) and average fade duration (AFD) of an $N$-port FAS over Nakagami-$m$ fading channels. Leveraging these second-order statistics, we define two key dependability metrics such as mission reliability and mean time-to-first-failure (MTTFF), to quantify the probability of uninterrupted operation over a defined mission duration. We further extend the classical effective capacity (EC) concept to incorporate mission reliability in the FBL regime, yielding a mission EC (mEC). To capture energy efficiency under bursty traffic and latency constraints, we also develop the mission effective energy efficiency (mEEE) metric and formulate its maximization as a non-convex fractional optimization problem. This problem is then solved via a modified Dinkelbach's method with an embedded line search. Extensive simulations uncover critical trade-offs among port count, QoS exponent, signal-to-noise ratio, and mission duration, offering insights for the design of ultra-reliable, low-latency, and energy-efficient industrial internet-of-things (IIoT) systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.19984 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The considered topology consists of a single fixed- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The mEEE results as a function of Φ for different number of ports, N assuming fixed m, W, and ∆T. illustrates how optimizing the mEEE concerning Φ can en￾hance system performance under various parameter settings. Therefore, we design the optimization problem of maximizing mEEE under mission reliability constraints. C. mEEE Maximization Ensuring the IIoT network’s QoS and mEEE demands effi￾cient resource utilization,… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The NLCR results against the average SNR, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Trade-off between ∆T and RM(∆T) under FBL for different configurations of W, and N for m = 2 (which corresponds to the cases with some line-of-sight (LoS) component in the channel). RM(∆T) and mission duration ∆T. As we can see, mission reliability declines with increa…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The optimized mEEE against ∆T with W = 0.03 and m = 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The optimized mEEE against RM with W = 0.03 and m = 4. VI. CONCLUSION We presented a comprehensive dependability-based analysis of FAS tailored to mission-critical IIoT applications. By deriv￾ing closed-form LCR and AFD expressions for an N-port FAS under Nakagami-m fa…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [35]

    Mission effective capacity–A novel dependabi lity metric: A study case of multiconnectivity-enabled URLLC for IIoT,

    I. Muhammad, H. Alves, N. H. Mahmood, O. L. A. López and M. Latva-aho, “Mission effective capacity–A novel dependabi lity metric: A study case of multiconnectivity-enabled URLLC for IIoT,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. , vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 4180–4188, Jun. 2022

    work page 2022

  2. [51]

    Effecti ve energy efficiency and statistical QoS provisioning under Markovia n arrivals and finite blocklength regime,

    F. Qasmi, M. Shehab, H. Alves and M. Latva-Aho, “Effecti ve energy efficiency and statistical QoS provisioning under Markovia n arrivals and finite blocklength regime,” IEEE Internet Things J. , vol. 9, no. 18, pp. 17741–17755, Sept. 2022

    work page 2022

  3. [1]

    On the level cr ossing rate of fluid antenna systems,

    P . Mukherjee, C. Psomas, and I. Krikidis, “On the level cr ossing rate of fluid antenna systems,” in Proc. IEEE Int. W orkshop Signal Process. Adv. Wireless Commun. (SPAWC) , 4-6 Jul. 2022, Oulu, Finland

    work page 2022

  4. [2]

    A tutorial on fluid antenna system for 6G networks: Encompassing communication theory, optimizati on meth- ods and hardware designs,

    W. K. New et al. , “A tutorial on fluid antenna system for 6G networks: Encompassing communication theory, optimizati on meth- ods and hardware designs,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tuts. , early access, doi:10.1109/COMST.2024.3498855, 2024. 12 N∑ i=2 ∫ xth 0 ··· ∫ xth 0/bracehtipupleft/bracehtipdownright/bracehtipdownleft/bracehtipupright (N −1)−fold p|h1|,...,|hN...

    work page arXiv 2024

  5. [3]

    Fluid antenna systems enabling 6G: Principles, applica- tions, and research directions,

    T. Wu et al. , “Fluid antenna systems enabling 6G: Principles, applica- tions, and research directions,” arXiv preprint , arXiv:2412.03839, Dec. 2024

    arXiv 2024

  6. [4]

    Fluid antennas: Reshaping intrinsic properties for flexible radiation characteristics in intelligent wireles s networks,

    W.-J. Lu et al. , “Fluid antennas: Reshaping intrinsic properties for flexible radiation characteristics in intelligent wireles s networks,” IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 40–45, May 2025

    2025

  7. [5]

    Large l anguage model empowered design of fluid antenna systems: Challenges , frame- works, and case studies for 6G,

    C. Wang, K.-K. Wong, Z. Li, L. Jin, and C.-B. Chae, “Large l anguage model empowered design of fluid antenna systems: Challenges , frame- works, and case studies for 6G,” to appear in IEEE Wireless Commun. , arXiv:2505.09751, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  8. [6]

    Perf ormance limits of fluid antenna systems,

    K. K. Wong, A. Shojaeifard, K. F. Tong, and Y . Zhang, “Perf ormance limits of fluid antenna systems,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 2469–2472, Nov. 2020

    2020

Show all 61 references
  1. [7]

    Flui d antenna systems,

    K. K. Wong, A. Shojaeifard, K. F. Tong, and Y . Zhang, “Flui d antenna systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1950–1962, Mar. 2021

    1950

  2. [8]

    Design and implementation of mmWave surface wave enabled fluid antennas and experimental results for fluid ant enna multi- ple access,

    Y . Shen et al. , “Design and implementation of mmWave surface wave enabled fluid antennas and experimental results for fluid ant enna multi- ple access,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:2405.09663, May 2024

    2024

  3. [9]

    A novel pixel-based reconfigurable antenna applied in fluid antenna systems with high switching speed,

    J. Zhang et al. , “A novel pixel-based reconfigurable antenna applied in fluid antenna systems with high switching speed,” IEEE Open J. Antennas & Propag. , vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 212-228, Feb. 2025

    2025

  4. [10]

    P ro- grammable meta-fluid antenna for spatial multiplexing in fa st fluctuating radio channels,

    B. Liu, K.-F. Tong, K. K. Wong, C.-B. Chae, and H. Wong, “P ro- grammable meta-fluid antenna for spatial multiplexing in fa st fluctuating radio channels,” Optics Express, vol. 33, no. 13, pp. 28898–28915, 2025

    2025

  5. [11]

    A new analy tical ap- proximation of the fluid antenna system channel,

    M. Khammassi, A. Kammoun and M.-S. Alouini, “A new analy tical ap- proximation of the fluid antenna system channel,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 8843–8858, Dec. 2023

    2023

  6. [12]

    Flu id antenna system: New insights on outage probability and dive rsity gain,

    W. K. New, K. K. Wong, H. Xu, K. F. Tong and C.-B. Chae, “Flu id antenna system: New insights on outage probability and dive rsity gain,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 128–140, Jan. 2024

    2024

  7. [13]

    Novel expressions for the outage probability an d diversity gains in fluid antenna system,

    J. D. V ega-S ´ anchez, A. E. L ´ opez-Ram´irez, L. Urquiza-Aguiar and D. P . M. Osorio, “Novel expressions for the outage probability an d diversity gains in fluid antenna system,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 372–376, Feb. 2024

    2024

  8. [14]

    On the performance of fluid antennas systems under α-µ fading channels,

    P . D. Alvim et al., “On the performance of fluid antennas systems under α-µ fading channels,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 108–112, Jan. 2024

    2024

  9. [15]

    A new spatial block-correlation model for fluid antenna systems,

    P . Ramírez-Espinosa, D. Morales-Jimenez and K. K. Wong , “A new spatial block-correlation model for fluid antenna systems, ” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 15829–15843, Nov. 2024

    2024

  10. [16]

    Copula- based performance analysis for fluid antenna systems under a rbitrary fading channels,

    F. R. Ghadi, K. K. Wong, F. J. L ´ opez-Mart´inez and K. F. Tong, “Copula- based performance analysis for fluid antenna systems under a rbitrary fading channels,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 3068–3072, Nov. 2023

    2023

  11. [17]

    Continuous fluid antenna systems: Modeling and analysis,

    C. Psomas, P . J. Smith, H. A. Suraweera and I. Krikidis, “ Continuous fluid antenna systems: Modeling and analysis,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 3370–3374, Dec. 2023

    2023

  12. [18]

    A n information-theoretic characterization of MIMO-FAS: Opt imization, diversity-multiplexing tradeoff and q-outage capacity,

    W. K. New, K.-K. Wong, H. Xu, K.-F. Tong and C.-B. Chae, “A n information-theoretic characterization of MIMO-FAS: Opt imization, diversity-multiplexing tradeoff and q-outage capacity,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 5541–5556, Jun. 2024

    2024

  13. [19]

    Capacity maximization for FAS-assisted multiple access channels,

    H. Xu et al. , “Capacity maximization for FAS-assisted multiple access channels,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , doi:10.1109/TCOMM.2024.3516499, 2024

    2024

  14. [20]

    Fluid antenna system enhancing orthogonal and non- orthogonal multiple access,

    W. K. New, K. K. Wong, H. Xu, K. F. Tong, C.-B. Chae, and Y . Zhang, “Fluid antenna system enhancing orthogonal and non- orthogonal multiple access,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 218–222, Jan. 2024

    2024

  15. [21]

    Shifting the ISAC trade-off with fluid antenna systems,

    J. Zou et al. , “Shifting the ISAC trade-off with fluid antenna systems,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 3479–3483, Dec. 2024

    2024

  16. [22]

    Fluid antenna system liberating multiuser MIMO for ISAC via deep reinforcement learning,

    C. Wang et al. , “Fluid antenna system liberating multiuser MIMO for ISAC via deep reinforcement learning,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 10879–10894, Sept. 2024

    2024

  17. [23]

    Enhanced over-the-air federated learning using AI-based fluid antenna system,

    M. Ahmadzadeh et al. , “Enhanced over-the-air federated learning using AI-based fluid antenna system,” arXiv preprint , arXiv:2407.03481v2, Feb. 2025

    2025 arXiv

  18. [24]

    Exploring the performance of fluid antenna sy stem (FAS)-aided B5G mmWave networks,

    L. Tlebaldiyeva, S. Arzykulov, A. Dadlani, K. M. Rabie a nd G. Nauryzbayev, “Exploring the performance of fluid antenna sy stem (FAS)-aided B5G mmWave networks,” in Proc. IEEE Global Commun. Conf. (GLOBECOM) , pp. 7568–7573, 4-8 Dec. 2023, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    2023

  19. [25]

    Fluid antenna with l inear MMSE channel estimation for large-scale cellular networks,

    C. Skouroumounis and I. Krikidis, “Fluid antenna with l inear MMSE channel estimation for large-scale cellular networks,” IEEE Trans. Com- mun., vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 1112–1125, Feb. 2023

    2023

  20. [26]

    Channel estimation for FAS-assisted multiuser mmWave systems,

    H. Xu et al. , “Channel estimation for FAS-assisted multiuser mmWave systems,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 632–636, Mar. 2024

    2024

  21. [27]

    Channel estimation and reconstruction in fluid antenna system: Oversampling is essential,

    W. K. New et al. , “Channel estimation and reconstruction in fluid antenna system: Oversampling is essential,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Com- mun., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 309–322, Jan. 2025

    2025

  22. [28]

    Successive b ayesian 13 reconstructor for channel estimation in fluid antenna syste ms,

    Z. Zhang, J. Zhu, L. Dai, and R. W. Heath Jr, “Successive b ayesian 13 reconstructor for channel estimation in fluid antenna syste ms,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. ,vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1992–2006, Mar. 2025

    1992

  23. [29]

    Resilient-by-design: A resiliency framework for future wire- less networks,

    N. H. Mahmood, S. Samarakoon, P . Porambage, M. Bennis, a nd M. Latva-aho, “Resilient-by-design: A resiliency framework for future wire- less networks,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:2410.23203v2, Jul. 2025

    2025 arXiv

  24. [30]

    Mission relia bility for URLLC in wireless networks,

    T. Hößler, M. Simsek, and G. P . Fettweis, “Mission relia bility for URLLC in wireless networks,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 2350–2353, Nov. 2018

    2018

  25. [31]

    A survey on 5G usage scenarios and traffic models,

    J. Navarro-Ortiz et al. , “A survey on 5G usage scenarios and traffic models,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials , vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 905–929, Second Quarter 2020

    2020

  26. [32]

    Effective capacity: A wireless link m odel for support of quality of service,

    D. Wu and R. Negi, “Effective capacity: A wireless link m odel for support of quality of service,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 630–643, Apr. 2003

    2003

  27. [33]

    Secure rate control and statistical QoS provision- ing for cloud-based IoT networks,

    I. Muhammad et al. , “Secure rate control and statistical QoS provision- ing for cloud-based IoT networks,” Secur . Commun. Netw., vol. 2021, pp. 1–19, Oct. 2021

    2021

  28. [34]

    Effective cap acity in wireless networks: A comprehensive survey,

    M. Amjad, L. Musavian, and M. H. Rehmani, “Effective cap acity in wireless networks: A comprehensive survey,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 3007–3038, Fourth Quarter 2019

    2019

  29. [36]

    Abramowitz and I

    M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables , Dover, 1965

    1965

  30. [37]

    Papoulis and S

    A. Papoulis and S. U. Pillai, Probability, random variables, and stochas- tic processes, 4th ed., McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2002

    2002

  31. [38]

    Enhancing QoS through fluid antenna systems over correlated Nakagami-m fading channels,

    L. Tlebaldiyeva, G. Nauryzbayev, S. Arzykulov, A. Elta wil and T. Tsiftsis, “Enhancing QoS through fluid antenna systems over correlated Nakagami-m fading channels,” in Proc. IEEE Wireless Commun. and Networking Conf. (WCNC) , pp. 78–83, 10-13 Apr. 2022, Austin, TX, USA

    2022

  32. [39]

    Achieving extremely lo w-latency in industrial Internet of Things: Joint finite blocklength c oding, resource block matching, and performance analysis,

    X. Zhao, W. Chen, and H. V . Poor, “Achieving extremely lo w-latency in industrial Internet of Things: Joint finite blocklength c oding, resource block matching, and performance analysis,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 69, no. 10, pp. 6529–6544, Oct. 2021

    2021

  33. [40]

    Channel coding rate in the finite blocklength regime,

    Y . Polyanskiy, H. V . Poor, and S. V erdu, “Channel coding rate in the finite blocklength regime,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory , vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 2307–2359, May 2010

    2010

  34. [41]

    On the accuracy o f a first- order Markov model for data transmission on fading channels ,

    M. Zorzi, R. R. Rao, and L. B. Milstein, “On the accuracy o f a first- order Markov model for data transmission on fading channels ,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Universal Personal Commun. (ICUPC) , pp. 211–215, 6-10 Nov. 1995, Tokyo, Japan

    1995

  35. [42]

    Wireless powered communications with finite batter y and finite blocklength,

    O. L. Alcaraz López, E. M. G. Fernández, R. D. Souza and H. Alves, “Wireless powered communications with finite batter y and finite blocklength,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 1803–1816, Apr. 2018

    2018

  36. [43]

    Mathematical analysis of random noise,

    S. O. Rice, “Mathematical analysis of random noise,” Bell Syst. Tech. J., vol. 24, pp. 46–156, 1945

    1945

  37. [44]

    G. L. Stüber, Principles of mobile communications , Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996

    1996

  38. [45]

    Fast simulation of diversity Nakagami fading channels using finite-state Markov models,

    C. D. Iskander and P . T. Mathiopoulos, “Fast simulation of diversity Nakagami fading channels using finite-state Markov models, ” IEEE Trans. Broadcast., vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 269–277, Sept. 2003

    2003

  39. [46]

    Level cross ing rate and average fade duration for pure selection and threshold s election diversity-combining systems,

    M. D. Y acoub, C. R. da Silva, and J. V argas B, “Level cross ing rate and average fade duration for pure selection and threshold s election diversity-combining systems,” Int. J. Commun. Syst. , vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 897–907, Dec. 2001

    2001

  40. [47]

    M. K. Simon and M.-S. Alouini, Digital communications over general- ized fading channels: A unified approach to performance anal ysis, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2000

    2000

  41. [48]

    Minimum duration outage o f wireless Rayleigh-fading links using selection combining,

    D. Öhmann and G. P . Fettweis, “Minimum duration outage o f wireless Rayleigh-fading links using selection combining,” in Proc. IEEE Wire- less Commun. and Networking Conf. (WCNC) , pp. 681–686, 9-12 Mar. 2015, New Orleans, LA, USA

    2015

  42. [49]

    Ap- plying reliability theory for future wireless communicati on networks,

    T. Hößler, L. Scheuvens, N. Franchi, M. Simsek and G. P . F ettweis, “Ap- plying reliability theory for future wireless communicati on networks,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Pers., Indoor , Mobile Radio Commun. (P IMRC), 8-13 Oct. 2017, Montreal, QC, Canada

    2017

  43. [50]

    Hoyland and M

    A. Hoyland and M. Rausand, System reliability theory: models and statistical methods , John Wiley & Sons, 2009

    2009

  44. [52]

    Secure s tatistical QoS provisioning for machine-type wireless communication networks,

    H. Alves, P . H. J. Nardelli, and C. H. M. de Lima, “Secure s tatistical QoS provisioning for machine-type wireless communication networks,” in Proc. IEEE V eh. Technol. Conf. (VTC Spring) , 3-6 Jun. 2018, Porto, Portugal

    2018

  45. [53]

    Industrial commu nication systems and their future challenges: Next-generation ethernet, II oT, and 5G,

    S. Vitturi, C. Zunino, and T. Sauter, “Industrial commu nication systems and their future challenges: Next-generation ethernet, II oT, and 5G,” Proc. IEEE , vol. 107, no. 6, pp. 944–961, Jun. 2019

    2019

  46. [54]

    Energy-effic ient industrial Internet of Things: Overview and open issues,

    W. Mao, Z. Zhao, Z. Chang, G. Min and W. Gao, “Energy-effic ient industrial Internet of Things: Overview and open issues,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. , vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 7225–7237, Nov. 2021

    2021

  47. [55]

    S. Boyd, S. P . Boyd, and L. V andenberghe, Convex optimization , Cambridge university press, 2004

    2004

  48. [56]

    Fractional programming for communic ation systems–Part I: Power control and beamforming,

    K. Shen and W. Y u, “Fractional programming for communic ation systems–Part I: Power control and beamforming,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 66, no. 10, pp. 2616–2630, May 2018

    2018

  49. [57]

    Solving frac tional polyno- mial problems by polynomial optimization theory,

    A. Pizzo, A. Zappone, and L. Sanguinetti, “Solving frac tional polyno- mial problems by polynomial optimization theory,” IEEE Signal Process Lett., vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 1540–1544, Oct. 2018

    2018

  50. [58]

    Y ang and M.-S

    L. Y ang and M.-S. Alouini, Average outage duration of wireless com- munication systems, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004, ch. 8, pp. 209– 240

    2004

  51. [59]

    New bounds for the Marcum Q-function,

    G. Corazza and G. Ferrari, “New bounds for the Marcum Q-function,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory , vol. 48, no. 11, pp. 3003–3008, Nov. 2002

    2002

  52. [60]

    I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik, Table of integrals, series, and products, Elsevier, 2007

    2007

  53. [61]

    Second- order statistics for diversity-combining techniques in Na kagami-fading channels,

    M. D. Y acoub, C. R. C. M. da Silva, and J. E. V argas Bautist a, “Second- order statistics for diversity-combining techniques in Na kagami-fading channels,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol. , vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 1464–1470, Nov. 2001

    2001

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.