Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Classification of singular limits for free boundary and singularly perturbed elliptic problems: the Dancer-Yan spikes revisited

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that two-dimensional plasma equilibria can form three distinct spike types, and with Dirichlet conditions only two survive.

desk verdict A real step forward for the 2D plasma free-boundary singular limit, with a genuine trichotomy and a global classification, but the hinge Proposition 2.2 is deferred and the paper cannot be fully verified from itself. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.20725 v1 pith:EQ7TATXW submitted 2025-07-28 math.AP

Daniele Bartolucci , Aleks Jevnikar , Juncheng Wei , Ruijun Wu This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35B4035B9935J6135J7535R3582D10
keywords freeboundaryproblemplasmaphysicssingularlyperturbedellipticequationDancer-YanspikesspikeclassificationKirchhoff-RouthHamiltonianEmdenblow-upanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper classifies the possible singular limits of solutions to a planar plasma free-boundary problem as the current parameter $I\to+\infty$, i.e. as $\varepsilon\to0$ in the singularly perturbed equation $-\varepsilon^2\Delta v=[v-1]_+^p$. Around any interior maximum that does not vanish, the paper proves a trichotomy: the spike is a Dancer-Yan spike (normalized limit $w^*$ with bounded rescaled height), a Type II spike (same normalized profile but with rescaled height diverging to $+\infty$), or a fading spike that dissolves into an $\varepsilon^{2/(p-1)}$ background. This is new because in dimension two the Dancer-Yan spike is not the only possible concentration profile, contrary to a natural extrapolation from higher dimensions. With Dirichlet boundary conditions and a non-vanishing $p$-mass condition, the paper shows that only Type I and Type II spikes survive, that the singular set is finite, that the plasma region is asymptotically a union of round disks, and that the Type I spike locations form a critical point of the Kirchhoff-Routh Hamiltonian. The same conclusions are transferred back to the original plasma variables in Theorem 1.3.

What carries the argument

The engine of the proof is the Dancer-Yan refined rescaling. The scale $s_n$ is fixed by $(\varepsilon_n/s_n)^{2/(p-1)}\varphi'(1)\ln(\sqrt{\pi}s_n)=1$, $\theta_n=\varphi'(1)\ln(\sqrt{\pi}s_n)$ is the amplification factor, and $t_n=(\varphi(0)/(\theta_n(v_n(x_n)-1)))^{(p-1)/2}$ encodes the reciprocal spike height. The normalized function $u_n(z)=t_n^{2/(p-1)}\theta_n(v_n(x_n+s_nt_nz)-1)$ satisfies $-\Delta u_n=[u_n]_+^p$ with $u_n(0)=\varphi(0)$, so any $C^2$ local limit is an entire solution of (2.4); Proposition 2.2, built on decay and moving-plane methods, forces such a finite-mass entire solution to be the explicit profile $w^*$ (the Emden solution $\varphi$ inside the unit disk and the logarithmic tail $\varphi'(1)\ln|x|$ outside). The extra $t_n$ rescaling, using the invariance of the equation under $R_t$, is exactly what distinguishes Type I from Type II and reveals the fading alternative that the cruder $\tilde{v}_n$ variables miss.

What would settle it

A concrete way to falsify the central claim is to find a finite-mass, bounded entire solution of $-\Delta w=[w]_+^p$ in $\mathbb{R}^2$ whose positive set is not a single disk, for instance two well-separated positive bumps with finite total mass; Proposition 2.2, and with it the identification of the blow-up limit with $w^*$ in the proofs of Theorem 1.1 and Theorem 1.2, would be false. Short of an exact construction, a numerical search over radial and non-radial profiles for a second finite-mass solution with the same integral bound would settle the rigidity statement.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is Theorem 1.1: for any sequence of solutions of (1.2) satisfying the integral bounds (H1) and (H2) and having an interior maximum $x_n\to x_*$, after the two-scale rescaling (1.6) with $u_n(0)=\varphi(0)$, either $s_nt_n\to0$ and $u_n$ converges in $C^2$ to the explicit radial profile $w^*$, or $s_nt_n$ stays bounded away from zero and $v_n(x)-1$ is, in a full neighbourhood of $x_*$, of size $\varepsilon_n^{2/(p-1)}$ times a bounded profile with maximum at most $\varphi(0)$. Within the first alternative, Type I spikes are the Dancer-Yan spikes ($t_n\to t_\infty\in(T_0,+\infty)$), while Type II spikes have $t_n\to+\infty$ but still $s_nt_n\to0$. Theorem 1.2 then asserts that with Dirichlet boundary data and $(NV_p)$, vanishing and fading are impossible, the singular set is finite, the $(p-1)$-mass of the whole sequence converges to $(N_I+N_{II})I_{p-1}$, the $p$-mass is governed by the $t_{\infty,j}$ and is not quantized, the plasma region is a union of asymptotically round disks, and the Type I concentrations are a critical point of the Kirchhoff-Routh Hamiltonian (1.13).

Load-bearing premise

The classification rests on Proposition 2.2, the claim that every finite-mass entire solution of $-\Delta w=[w]_+^p$ in $\mathbb{R}^2$ is, up to translation and scaling, the explicit radial profile $w^*$; the paper sketches the proof and defers the decay, radial symmetry, and moving-plane details to [16], and if that rigidity statement were false the blow-up limit $u_\infty$ would not have to be $w^*$, so the round-spike shape, quantized $(p-1)$-masses, and the Hamiltonian condition would not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any sequence satisfying (H1) and (H2), each interior maximum has a complete local asymptotic description: one of vanishing, Dancer-Yan (Type I), Type II, or fading, with the normalized profile $w^*$ in the two spike cases.
  • With Dirichlet boundary data and $(NV_p)$, the singular set is finite and nonempty, and outside any of its neighbourhoods $[v_n-1]_+$ vanishes identically for large $n$.
  • The $(p-1)$-mass of the sequence quantizes: it converges to $(N_I+N_{II})I_{p-1}$, while the $p$-mass converges to a sum of terms $I_p/t_{\infty,j}^{2/(p-1)}$ that is not quantized in general.
  • The plasma region $\{v_n>1\}$ is asymptotically a disjoint union of disks of radii $(1\pm\theta)s_nt_{n,j}$, in the sense of Caffarelli-Friedman.
  • In the original plasma variables (Theorem 1.3), the scaled solutions converge to a sum of Green functions, the asymptotic relation $|\alpha_n|\sim(1+o(1))\gamma_\infty|\varphi'(1)|(p-1)/2\,\lambda_n\log\lambda_n$ holds, and the Type I spike points are a critical point of the Kirchhoff-Routh Hamiltonian.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the trichotomy is driven by the relative rate $s_nt_n$, a natural numerical experiment is to compute Dirichlet solutions of (1.2) on non-convex domains and check whether Type II spikes ($t_n\to\infty$, $s_nt_n\to0$) actually occur; the paper only proves they cannot be ruled out by (H1),(H2), and its conjecture says convex domains forbid them.
  • The non-quantization of the $p$-mass, in contrast with the quantized $(p-1)$-mass, suggests that for this class of problems the correct critical-invariant analogue of Liouville or Yamabe quantization is the variation of the current density with respect to $v$, not the current density itself; this could be tested in Grad-Shafranov equilibrium data.
  • A full description of mixed Type I/Type II clusters at one point is left open; if such clusters exist, Theorem 1.2(e) leaves their Type II locations unconstrained by the Hamiltonian, so the geometry of the domain would have to enter through a higher-order interaction analysis.
  • If Proposition 2.2 could be reproved for sign-changing or shifted nonlinearities $[w-c]_+^p$, the same two-scale blow-up scheme would immediately yield analogous classifications for other free-boundary and singularly perturbed problems.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the singular limit as ε_n→0 of nonnegative solutions v_n of −ε_n^2 Δv_n = [v_n−1]_+^p in a bounded planar domain, under the integral bounds (H1) and (H2). Theorem 1.1 establishes a trichotomy around an interior maximum point: either vanishing, or a Dancer–Yan type spike (Type I when the rescaled parameter t_n has a finite limit, Type II when t_n→∞ but s_n t_n→0), or a fading spike in which v_n−1 is at most of order ε_n^{2/(p−1)}. Theorem 1.2 adds Dirichlet data and the non-vanishing condition (NVp), ruling out vanishing and fading spikes, proving that the singular set is finite, that the (p−1)-mass is quantized while the p-mass is not, that the plasma region is asymptotically a union of round disks, and that Type I spike locations form a critical point of a Kirchhoff–Routh Hamiltonian. Theorem 1.3 translates these conclusions back to the plasma formulation (P_λ). The paper also gives model Dancer–Yan profiles and one-dimensional infinite-mass solutions, and it states several open problems.

Significance. If the two load-bearing technical steps identified below are fully justified, this is a substantial advance in the two-dimensional plasma free-boundary problem: it provides a complete classification of possible singular limits, shows that the Dancer–Yan spike is only one of several possible behaviors, quantizes the (p−1)-mass while exposing the non-quantization of the p-mass, and extends the Kirchhoff–Routh criticality condition to this setting. The paper is careful with hypotheses, explicitly identifies the role of each integral bound, and is honest about open problems and limitations. The main value is therefore conditional on completing the proof of the entire-solution classification and on repairing the spike-separation argument.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2.2, Proposition 2.2] Proposition 2.2 is the hinge of the paper: the blow-up limit u_∞ in the proof of Theorem 1.1 is identified with w_* only through this classification, and the quantized masses, round plasma sets, and Hamiltonian criticality in Theorem 1.2 all inherit that identification. The proof in Steps 3–4 is only a sketch: the two-sided logarithmic decay and the moving-plane conclusion are asserted to follow 'as in [16]', but the cited result does not cover, in the stated form, sign-changing solutions of −Δw = [w]_+^p with finite [w]_+^p mass. In particular, the moving-plane argument has to be run across the zero set of w and through the region where the nonlinearity vanishes, and no details are supplied for this step. Since the paper itself says 'we will not provide the details here to avoid repetitions', the reader cannot verify the rigidity input from the manuscript. Please supply a complete proof or a precise citation of a theorem that covers this exact sign-changing classification.
  2. [§5.1, Lemma 5.2] The proof of the separation estimate (5.4) contains an unjustified step. The point x_{n,2} is defined as the maximizer of v_n on the complement of the first spike ball B_{2R_{n,1}s_n t_{n,1}}(x_{n,1}), not on all of Ω. Therefore the rescaled function u_{n,2} is not known to be bounded above by φ(0) on the ball where the proof evaluates it: at z_{n,1,2} = (x_{n,1}−x_{n,2})/(s_n t_{n,2}), the value u_{n,2}(z_{n,1,2}) uses v_n(x_{n,1}), which is the global maximum of v_n and is not controlled by the definition of x_{n,2}. The displayed divergence u_{n,2}(z_{n,1,2})→+∞ is therefore not a contradiction to any established bound. Since Lemma 5.2 is used to justify the inductive extraction of well-separated spikes in Theorem 1.2, this gap needs a repaired argument or an additional hypothesis.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§2.2, proof of Proposition 2.2] The polar-coordinate limit just after (2.8) is garbled: 'r ∂w/∂w → −β_p' should presumably read 'r ∂w/∂r → −β_p' (or the intended quotient should be written out explicitly).
  2. [§7, Theorem 1.3, assumption (1.15)] The integral in (1.15) is missing the volume element: it should be λ_n ∫_Ω [α_n + λ_n ψ_n]_+^{p−1} dx ≤ C_{p−1}.
  3. [§4, after the proof of Theorem 1.1] There is a typo 'Figuer' in the sentence referring to Figure 1; also the figures are not included in the text version supplied.
  4. [§6, proof of (e)] The final Pohozaev computation is deferred to [36]/[5] with the phrase 'exactly the same computations'. Since part (e) is a central consequence, a short indication of how the Green-function expression G(x) is inserted into (6.2) and how the limit r→0 yields ∇F_1(a_1)=0 would make the paper more self-contained.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the trichotomy is derived from external rigidity inputs rather than from fitted parameters or a self-citation chain; the main caveat is the deferred proof of the entire-solution classification in Proposition 2.2, which is a completeness gap, not a circular step.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The blow-up limit in Theorem 1.1 is identified with the explicit profile w* only through Proposition 2.2, which is an independent classification of finite-mass entire solutions of -Delta w = [w]^p_+ in R^2, sketched from the external results in [16] and [12]; it does not assume the paper's trichotomy. The normalization un(0) = phi(0) is imposed by the definition of tn, but the conclusion un -> w* is forced by Proposition 2.2, not by that normalization. The Type I/II/Fading alternatives follow from the integral bounds (H1)-(H2), equation (1.7), and the dichotomy s_n t_n -> 0 versus positive lower bound, not by construction. Theorem 1.2's mass identities (1.9)-(1.10), round plasma regions (1.11), and the Kirchhoff-Routh condition (e) are consequences of the w* limit, Green representation, and the Pohozaev identity, with external citations [36] and the independent result [5]. Self-citations [2,3,4,5] are present, and [5] is used for a C^2 compactness statement in Proposition 4.1; this is independent evidence and does not reduce the central claim to the authors' prior work. The one load-bearing caveat is Proposition 2.2, Section 2.2, Step 3: the moving-plane argument for the sign-changing case is deferred, and the paper states 'we will not provide the details here to avoid repetitions.' If that classification failed or required an extra hypothesis, the identification u_infinity = w* and hence the quantitative conclusions in (B-i), (B-ii), (1.9)-(1.10), (1.11), and (e) would not follow. That is a missing-proof/correctness risk, not a circularity, because the cited [16] does not assume the target result.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No empirical fits or invented physical entities. All constants (I, p, H_{p-1}, H_p, C_p, C_{p-1}, gamma, alpha_n, lambda_n) are hypotheses, inputs, or normalization scales fixed by the problem; T_0 is derived from H_p and I_p, not fitted. Type II and Fading are asymptotic regimes of solutions, not new forces or particles; the 1D infinite-mass solutions of section 3.2 are explicit counterexamples used to justify (H1), not mechanisms introduced to force the main result.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Full classification of finite-mass entire solutions of -Delta w = [w]^p_+ in R^2 (Proposition 2.2)
    Stated with a sketchy proof that delegates radial-symmetry and decay details to [16]; it is load-bearing for the spike profile w*.
  • standard math Uniqueness and radial monotonicity of the Emden solution in the unit ball (Gidas-Ni-Nirenberg [25])
    Used to identify phi and the interior profile in (2.5) and in (2.1).
  • standard math Green's function estimates and vectorial Pohozaev identity for the Hamiltonian constraint
    Used in Theorem 1.2(e) and section 6; the Poincare computation is said to be 'exactly the same as in [36]'.
  • standard math No critical points of v_n in a boundary layer (Lemma 6.1)
    Cited to Proposition 4 of [36] (moving plane/Kelvin transform); ensures spike points stay in the interior.
  • domain assumption The plasma equation (F_I) is a valid model of Tokamak equilibria
    Motivates the mathematical problem but is not used in the proofs.
  • ad hoc to paper Hypotheses (H2) and (NVp) as natural but not fully justified integrability constraints
    (H2) controls the p-mass and enters T_0; the authors note they do not know whether (H2) can be dropped, and (NVp) is required to rule out Vanishing and Fading in the global theorem.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Classification of singular limits for free boundary and singularly perturbed elliptic problems: the Dancer-Yan spikes revisited." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EQ7TATXW

@misc{pith2026250720725,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Classification of singular limits for free boundary and singularly perturbed elliptic problems: the Dancer-Yan spikes revisited},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EQ7TATXW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.20725}
}
abstract

We classify the singular limits relative to a free boundary problem arising in plasma physics in dimension $d=2$, under suitable natural integral bounds. It turns out that one of the asymptotic behaviors allowed corresponds to the Dancer-Yan spikes (J. London Math. Soc. ({\bf 78}) 2008, 639--662). Interestingly enough, roughly speaking and unlike the higher dimensional case, it is not true that any solution in the limit is a Dancer-Yan spike. Indeed, the spiking structure is more rich and we succeed in a detailed description of the singular behavior by a careful analysis, from local to global, of the tiny difference between the maximum value of the spikes and their ``vanishing level'' defining the free boundary.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.20725 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Spikes arising from Theorem 1.1 as n → +∞. 5. Extraction of a second spike sequence We prove various partial results which at last will be used to prove Theorem 1.2. We split the discussion into three subsections, whose titles are meant to clarify which is the aim therein. We keep the notations in (4.4) and let xn,1 ≡ xn → x ∗ ∈ Ω be the interior maxima of vn such that max Ω0 vn = vn(xn,1). If x ∗ is regular, whence… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Global behavior of the spikes We are just left with the proof of (e). Proof of (e). We recall (6.1), which we write as follows, lim n→+∞ θnvn(x) =X NI i=1 Ip t 2 p−1 ∞,i G(x, x∗ ∞,i) = Ip Xm1 ℓ=1 MℓG(x, x∗ ∞,ℓ) =: IpG(x), where Mℓ was defined in (1.12). This convergence is uniform in Ω \(Σ)r, where (see (b)), vn(x) is of order O( 1 θn ). However it is well known (see for example [36] or either [5]) that in this situ… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Qualitative bifurcation diagram for Grad-Shafranov type equations

    math.AP 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    For general elliptic operators and superlinear subcritical nonlinearities, solutions of Grad-Shafranov-type problems are unique and monotone below an explicit spectral threshold larger than (A/p)Λ(Ω,2p).

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [5]

    Bartolucci, A

    D. Bartolucci, A. Jevnikar, R. Wu, Sharp estimates, uniqueness and spikes condensation for superlinear free boundary problems arising in plasma physics , Calc. Var. 64, 153 (2025)

    work page 2025

  2. [20]

    Dancer, S

    N. Dancer, S. Yan, A new type of concentration solutions for a singularly perturbed elliptic problem , Jour. London Math. Soc. 78 (2008), 639-662

    work page 2008

  3. [16]

    W. X. Chen & C. Li, Qualitative properties of solutions of some nonlinear elliptic equations in R2, Duke Math. J. 71(2) (1993), 427-439

    work page 1993

  4. [36]

    L. Ma, J. Wei, Convergence for a Liouville equation , Comm. Math. Helv., 76 (2001), 506-514

    work page 2001

  5. [1]

    Ambrosetti, G

    A. Ambrosetti, G. Mancini, A free boundary problem and a related semilinear equation , Nonlin. An. 4(5) (1980), 909-915

    1980

  6. [2]

    Bartolucci, A

    D. Bartolucci, A. Jevnikar, On the uniqueness and monotonicity of solutions of free boundary problems , J. Diff. Eq. 306 (2022), 152-188

    work page 2022

  7. [3]

    Bartolucci, A

    D. Bartolucci, A. Jevnikar, New universal estimates for free boundary problems arising in plasma physics , Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 150 (2022), 673-686

    work page 2022

  8. [4]

    Bartolucci, A

    D. Bartolucci, A. Jevnikar, Y. Hu, W. Yang, Generic properties of free boundary problems in plasma physics , Nonlin- earity 35 (2022), 411-444

    work page 2022

Show all 56 references
  1. [6]

    Bandle, M

    C. Bandle, M. Marcus, On the boundary values of solutions of a problem arising in plasma physics , Nonlinear Anal. 6 (1982), 1287-1294

    1982

  2. [7]

    Bandle, M

    C. Bandle, M. Marcus, A priori estimates and the boundary values of solutions for a problem arising in plasma physics , Nonlinear Anal. 7(4) (1983), 439-451

    1983

  3. [8]

    Bandle, M

    C. Bandle, M. Marcus, On the size of the plasma region , Applicable Anal. 15(4) (1983), 207-225

    1983

  4. [9]

    Bandle, R.P

    C. Bandle, R.P. Sperb, Qualitative behavior and bounds in a nonlinear plasma problem , SIAM J. Math. Anal. 14(1) (1983), 142-151

    1983

  5. [10]

    Beresticky, H

    H. Beresticky, H. Brezis, On a free boundary problem arising arising in plasma physics , Nonlinear Anal. 4(3) (1980), 415-436

    1980

  6. [11]

    Bertin, Dynamics of Galaxies , Cambridge U.P

    G. Bertin, Dynamics of Galaxies , Cambridge U.P. 2014

    2014

  7. [12]

    Brezis & F

    H. Brezis & F. Merle, Uniform estimates and blow-up behaviour for solutions of −∆u = V (x)eu in two dimensions , Comm. in P.D.E. 16(8,9) (1991), 1223-1253

    1991

  8. [13]

    Caffarelli, A

    L.A. Caffarelli, A. Friedman, Asymptotic estimates for the plasma problem , Duke Math. J. 47 (1980), 705-742. DANCER-YAN SPIKES REVISITED 33

    1980

  9. [14]

    D. Cao, S. Peng, S. Yan, Multiplicity of solutions for the plasma problem in two dimensions , Adv. Math. 225 (2010), 2741-2785

    2010

  10. [15]

    W. X. Chen & C. Li, Classification of solutions of some nonlinear elliptic equations, Duke Math. J. 63(3) (1991), 615-622

    1991

  11. [17]

    Cosentino, F

    P. Cosentino, F. Malizia, Simplicity and boundary behavior of spike sequences for a superlinear problem in plasma physics, arXiv:2505.21402

    arXiv

  12. [18]

    Damascelli, M

    L. Damascelli, M. Grossi and F. Pacella, Qualitative properties of positive solutions of semilinear elliptic equations in symmetric domains via the maximum principle , Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e16 (1999), 631-652

    1999

  13. [19]

    Damlamian, Application de la dualit´ e non convex ` a un probl` eme non lin´ eaire ` a fronti` ere libre, C

    A. Damlamian, Application de la dualit´ e non convex ` a un probl` eme non lin´ eaire ` a fronti` ere libre, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 286 (1978), 153-155

    1978

  14. [21]

    Flucher, J

    M. Flucher, J. Wei, Asymptotic behavior of elliptic free boundary problem , Math. Z. 228 (1998), 683-703

    1998

  15. [22]

    Freidberg, Ideal MHD, Cambridge U.P

    J. Freidberg, Ideal MHD, Cambridge U.P. 2014

    2014

  16. [23]

    Friedman, Y

    A. Friedman, Y. Liu, A free boundary problem arising in magnetohydrodynamic system , Ann. Sc. Norm. Sup. Pisa 22 (1995), 375-448

    1995

  17. [24]

    Gallou¨ et, Quelques remarques sur une ´ equation apparaissant en physique des plasmas , C

    T. Gallou¨ et, Quelques remarques sur une ´ equation apparaissant en physique des plasmas , C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 286(17) (1978), 739-741

    1978

  18. [25]

    Gidas, W.M

    B. Gidas, W.M. Ni, L. Nirenberg, Symmetry and related properties via the maximum principle , Comm. Math. Phys. 68 (1979), 209-243

    1979

  19. [26]

    Ham & P.E

    C.J. Ham & P.E. Farrell On multiple solutions of the Grad-Shafranov equation , Nucl. Fusion (2024) 64 034001

    2024

  20. [27]

    Horedt Applications in Astrophysics and related fields , Kluwer A.P

    G.P. Horedt Applications in Astrophysics and related fields , Kluwer A.P. 2004

    2004

  21. [28]

    Jeyakumar, D

    S. Jeyakumar, D. Pfefferl´ e, M.J. Hole & Z.S. Qu, Analysis of the isotropic and anisotropic Grad-Shafranov equation , J. Plasma Phys. (2021) 87 905870506. 209-243

    2021

  22. [29]

    Kinderlehrer, L

    D. Kinderlehrer, L. Nirenberg, J. Spruck, Regularity in elliptic free boundary problems , J. Anal. Math. 34 (1978), 86-119

    1978

  23. [30]

    Kinderlehrer, J

    D. Kinderlehrer, J. Spruck, The shape and smoothness of stable plasma configurations , Ann. S. N. S. Pisa Cl. Sci. 5 (1978), 131-148

    1978

  24. [31]

    Korman, A global solution curve for a class of free boundary value problems arising in plasma physics , Appl

    P. Korman, A global solution curve for a class of free boundary value problems arising in plasma physics , Appl. Math. Optim. 71 (2015), 25-38

    2015

  25. [32]

    Li, Harnack type inequality: the method of moving planes , Comm

    Y.Y. Li, Harnack type inequality: the method of moving planes , Comm. Math. Phys. 200 (1999), 421–444

    1999

  26. [33]

    Y. Li, S. Peng, Multi-peak solutions to two types of free boundary problems , Calc. Var. PDE. 54 (2015), 163-182

    2015

  27. [34]

    Li and I

    Y.Y. Li and I. Shafrir, Blow up analysis for solutions of −∆u = V eu in dimension two , Indiana Univ. Math. J. 43 (1994) 1255-1270

    1994

  28. [35]

    Liu, Multiple solutions for a free boundary problem arising in plasma physics , Proc

    Z. Liu, Multiple solutions for a free boundary problem arising in plasma physics , Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 144(5) (2014), 965-990

    2014

  29. [37]

    Marcus, On uniqueness of boundary values of solutions of a problem arising in plasma physics , Math

    M. Marcus, On uniqueness of boundary values of solutions of a problem arising in plasma physics , Math. Z. 190 (1985), 107-112

    1985

  30. [38]

    Mitidieri, S.I

    E. Mitidieri, S.I. Pohozaev, A priori estimates and blow-up of solutions to nonlinear differential equations and inequal- ities, Proceedings of the Steklov Institute of Mathematics (234), 2001, 362 pp

    2001

  31. [39]

    Ortega, Nonexistence of radial solutions of two elliptic boundary value problems , Proc

    R. Ortega, Nonexistence of radial solutions of two elliptic boundary value problems , Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 114(1-2) (1990), 27-31

    1990

  32. [40]

    Pentland et al

    K. Pentland et al. Validation of the static forward Grad-Shafranov equilibrium solvers in FreeGSNKE and Fiesta using EFIT++ reconstructions from MAST-U , Phys. Scripta (2025) 100 025608

    2025

  33. [41]

    Pentland, N

    K. Pentland, N. C. Amorisco, P. E. Farrell & C. J. Ham, Multiple solutions to the static forward free-boundary Grad- Shafranov problem on MAST-U , arXiv:2503.05674

    arXiv

  34. [42]

    Puel (with A

    J.P. Puel (with A. Damlamian), A free boundary, nonlinear eigenvalue problem , in G.M. de La Penha, L.A. Medeiros (eds.), Contemporary Developments in Continuum Mechanics and Partial Differential Equations, North-Holland Pub- lishing Company (1978)

    1978

  35. [43]

    Schaeffer, Non-uniqueness in the equilibrium shape of a confined plasma , Comm

    D.G. Schaeffer, Non-uniqueness in the equilibrium shape of a confined plasma , Comm. PDE. 2(6) (1977), 587-600

    1977

  36. [44]

    Shibata, Asymptotic shape of a least energy solution to an elliptic free-boundary problem with nonautonomous nonlinearity, Asymptot

    M. Shibata, Asymptotic shape of a least energy solution to an elliptic free-boundary problem with nonautonomous nonlinearity, Asymptot. Anal. 31(1) (2002), 1-42

    2002

  37. [45]

    Shibata, Asymptotic shape of a solution for the plasma problem in higher dimensional spaces , Comm

    M. Shibata, Asymptotic shape of a solution for the plasma problem in higher dimensional spaces , Comm. Pure Appl. Anal. 2(2) (2003), 259-275

    2003

  38. [46]

    Sijbrand, Bifurcation analysis of a nonlinear free boundary problem from plasma physics , Lect

    J. Sijbrand, Bifurcation analysis of a nonlinear free boundary problem from plasma physics , Lect. Note. Math. 711 (1979), 76-93. 34 D. BARTOLUCCI, A. JEVNIKAR, J. WEI, AND R. WU

    1979

  39. [47]

    Sijbrand, Bifurcation analysis for a class of problems with a free boundary , Nonlinear Anal

    J. Sijbrand, Bifurcation analysis for a class of problems with a free boundary , Nonlinear Anal. 3 (1979), 723-753

    1979

  40. [48]

    Stacey, Fusion Plasma Physics, Wiley-VCH 2005

    W.M. Stacey, Fusion Plasma Physics, Wiley-VCH 2005

    2005

  41. [49]

    Stampacchia, Le probl` eme de Dirichlet pour les ´ equations elliptiques du second ordre ` a coefficients discontinus, Ann

    G. Stampacchia, Le probl` eme de Dirichlet pour les ´ equations elliptiques du second ordre ` a coefficients discontinus, Ann. Inst. Fourier 15(1) (1965), pp. 189-257

    1965

  42. [50]

    Suzuki, R

    T. Suzuki, R. Takahashi Critical blowup exponent to a class of semilinear elliptic equations with constraints in higher dimension-local properties, Annali di Matematica 195 (2016), 1123-1151

    2016

  43. [51]

    Temam, A non-linear eigenvalue problem: the shape at equilibrium of a confined plasma , Arch

    R. Temam, A non-linear eigenvalue problem: the shape at equilibrium of a confined plasma , Arch. Rational Mech. Anal.60 (1975), 51-73

    1975

  44. [52]

    Temam, Remarks on a free boundary value problem arising in plasma physics , Comm

    R. Temam, Remarks on a free boundary value problem arising in plasma physics , Comm. PDE. 2 (1977), 563-585

    1977

  45. [53]

    Wang, Some nonlinear elliptic equations with subcritical growth and critical behavior , Houston J

    S. Wang, Some nonlinear elliptic equations with subcritical growth and critical behavior , Houston J. Math. 16 (1990), 559-572

    1990

  46. [54]

    G. Wang, D. Ye, On a nonlinear elliptic equation arising in a free boundary problem , Math. Z. 244 (2003), 531-548

    2003

  47. [55]

    Wei, Multiple condensations for a nonlinear elliptic equation with sub-critical growth and critical behaviour , Proc

    J. Wei, Multiple condensations for a nonlinear elliptic equation with sub-critical growth and critical behaviour , Proc. Edinb. Math. Soc. (2), 44(3) (2001), 631-660

    2001

  48. [56]

    Wolansky, Critical behavior of semi-linear elliptic equations with sub-critical exponents , Nonlinear Anal

    G. Wolansky, Critical behavior of semi-linear elliptic equations with sub-critical exponents , Nonlinear Anal. 26 (1996), 971-995. Daniele Bartolucci, Department of Mathematics, University of Rome”Tor Vergata”, Via della ricerca scien- tifica n.1, 00133 Roma. Email address : b...

    1996

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.