Blob Detection for Photonic Metasurface Designing: Angular and Spectral Control of Scattered Light

Alexander Lambertz; Anja Tiede; Anna Fontcuberta I Morral; Esther Alarcon-Llado; Femius Koenderink; Nick Feldman

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 44 references

Blob Detection for Photonic Metasurface Designing: Angular and Spectral Control of Scattered Light

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper introduces a non-iterative, blob-detection-based reverse design method for correlated-disordered metasurfaces that separates angular control (point pattern) from spectral control (resonator decoration) and validates it with…

desk verdict A genuinely useful non-iterative design route for correlated-disordered metasurfaces, with convincing experimental angular scattering data; the independence of spectral and angular control is plausible but not quantitatively established. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.20857 v1 pith:P2IL62MI submitted 2025-07-28 physics.optics

Anja Tiede , Nick Feldman , Alexander Lambertz , Femius Koenderink , Anna Fontcuberta i Morral , Esther Alarcon-Llado This is my paper · ORCID

classification physics.optics

keywords metasurfacecorrelateddisorderspectraldensityfunctionblobdetectionGaussianrandomfieldreversedesignangularscatteringtuning

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces a reverse-design recipe for correlated-disordered metasurfaces that avoids iterative optimization. The idea is to start from a desired angular scattering profile, encoded as a spectral density function; generate a correlated Gaussian random field from it; extract point positions with blob detection; and then place individually chosen nano-resonators at those points. The point pattern is claimed to control the angular scattering, the resonator shape and material the spectral response, and real-space superposition of two such patterns to produce a scattering response that is the sum of the parts. If correct, this gives a fast, non-iterative inverse-design route with independent angular and spectral control, demonstrated experimentally on Au nanopillars and computationally on dielectric resonators.

What carries the argument

The spectral density function (SDF), the radially averaged power spectral density of a real-space structure, is the design input and metric: it encodes the target angular scattering. The generation pipeline is the mechanism: construct a complex Fourier space from the SDF with random phases, inverse-transform to a correlated Gaussian random field, and apply Laplacian-of-Gaussians blob detection to read out correlated point coordinates. The physical factorization that makes the design work is the first-Born separation of the far-field scattering into a structure factor (from the point lattice) times a form factor (from each decoration unit); real-space superposition then exploits linearity of non-interacting scatterers to add scattering responses.

What would settle it

Measure the angular scattering of one point pattern decorated with two different resonator shapes at their respective resonant wavelengths, and also vary the pattern density while keeping the decoration fixed; if the scattering ring position or width shifts with resonator shape, or the spectral peak shifts with density, the structure-factor/form-factor product is violated.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that angular and spectral light scattering from a correlated-disordered metasurface can be designed separately and simultaneously in a single non-iterative procedure. An input spectral density function fixes the in-plane momentum content; a Gaussian random field with random phases is generated from it, and a Laplacian-of-Gaussians blob detector locates high-correlation points whose own radially averaged power spectrum closely matches the input. Those points are then decorated with nano-resonators whose geometry sets the spectral response, under the first-Born assumption that the far field is the product of the point-pattern structure factor and the single-resonator form factor. The paper validates the angular part with Fourier microscopy on fabricated Au nanopillar arrays and the spectral part with FDTD simulations of disk, ring, and star dielectric resonators, and shows that overlaying two independent decorated patterns in real space yields double-ring scattering with independently tunable ring intensities.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that each decorated point scatters as an independent resonator, so the ensemble far field factorizes into a structure factor from the point pattern and a form factor from the unit cell; if near-field coupling or collective lattice resonances become significant, independent angular and spectral control degrades.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Metasurface designs for light trapping, directional emission, or filtering can be generated in a single pass from a target scattering profile, without optimization or iteration.
The spectral response can be tuned by swapping the decoration unit while leaving the angular response fixed, enabling multi-resonant devices.
Real-space superposition of several decorated patterns produces a single-layer metasurface whose scattering is the sum of the component responses, with independent control of relative ring intensities via resonator size.
The same re-decoration step could be extended to phase or polarization control per point, since only the unit cell is changed.
Since point density increases with target spatial frequency, designs at high angles must use smaller resonators; the usable angular range is bounded by this trade-off.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Editorial: a direct quantitative test of the paper's independence premise would compare the measured far-field of a decorated pattern with the product of the pattern's measured structure factor and the single-resonator forward-scattering cross-section; any systematic deviation with wavelength or density would localize where the factorization fails.
Editorial: because the method separates lattice geometry from unit-cell geometry, it should transfer to other linear wave systems—acoustic, elastic, or microwave—where a desired angular response can be prescribed by a two-point correlation function.
Editorial: the paper's own supplementary observation that the decoration unit modifies the SDF at high spatial frequencies implies the angular and spectral channels are not perfectly independent; the practical limit is set by how strongly the form factor overlaps the target spatial-frequency band.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The core idea here is solid and worth knowing: instead of thresholding a Gaussian random field to get channel-type structures, the authors run Laplacian-of-Gaussians blob detection to get isolated points, then decorate each point with a resonator. That turns the SDF design philosophy into a toolbox with two separate knobs — point pattern for angular, resonator shape for spectral. The angular control is demonstrated directly: fabricated gold nanopillars show Fourier microscopy rings that match the input SDF, and the SEM Fourier transforms agree. The real-space superposition of two designs also works and produces the expected double-ring response. That is a real, experimentally grounded advance over iterative optimization for this class of problems.

Where the paper is softer is the "independent" control claim. The factorization into structure factor times form factor is exact only in the first Born, low-contrast limit, while the demonstrations use n=3.5 dielectrics and gold pillars. The spectral evidence in Figs. 3 and 5 compares angle-integrated scattered power with the isolated resonator's forward cross-section — that cannot detect whether the angular profile inside the designed k-band shifts with wavelength or with resonator shape. The authors themselves note "slight spectral differences are likely due to lattice interactions," and the supplementary material admits the decoration unit modifies the SDF at high spatial frequencies. So independence is not proven; it is an unverified assumption. I would not call that fatal, because the design method works for angular scattering regardless, and spectral tuning clearly does follow the resonator response to first order. But the abstract's "individual and independent control" overstates what the data support.

Minor issues: no public code or data ("available upon request" is weak), and the radially averaged profiles have no error bars or ensemble statistics. The writing is clear and the citations to prior SDF and hyperuniform work look appropriate; the novelty claim about blob detection is not undermined by the references.

This paper deserves a serious referee. The method is useful, the experimental validation is real, and the remaining question — how far the form-factor/structure-factor factorization holds for dense high-index or plasmonic patterns — is exactly the kind of thing referees should push on. I would recommend conditional acceptance after the authors either provide angle-resolved spectral data across the designed k-range or soften the independence claim to "largely separable."

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a non-iterative reverse-design method for correlated-disordered metasurfaces: starting from a target spectral density function (SDF), a Gaussian random field is generated in Fourier space, and Laplacian-of-Gaussians blob detection extracts point coordinates that are subsequently decorated with nano-resonators. The point pattern is intended to control angular scattering through its structure factor, while the resonator geometry controls the spectral response through its form factor. The authors fabricate Au nanopillar arrays, characterize angular scattering with Fourier microscopy at 640 nm, and find ring-shaped scattering patterns matching the input SDFs. They further use FDTD simulations for dielectric (n=3.5) resonator patterns with different shapes to show that spectral peaks track the isolated-resonator forward scattering cross-section. Finally, they demonstrate real-space superposition of two subpatterns with different decoration units as a route to simultaneous angular and spectral control, supported by Fourier microscopy for the angular part and FDTD for the spectral part.

Significance. If fully established, the method would be a valuable fast, non-iterative alternative to optimization-based inverse design for correlated-disordered metasurfaces with tailored angular and spectral scattering. The paper's concrete strengths are the experimental validation of angular ring control with SEM and Fourier microscopy for Au nanopillars, the demonstration of SDF matching for several input profiles in the Supplementary Information, and the real-space superposition concept that allows different subpatterns to be decorated independently. However, the central claim of independent angular and spectral control is not quantitatively supported: the spectral evidence is angle-integrated, the factorization assumption is invoked outside its stated low-contrast regime, and the experimental spectral demonstration is absent. These gaps are addressable with additional analysis, so the work is promising but needs revision.

major comments (4)

[Sec. 3.3, Figs. 3d-e] The evidence for spectral control is based on comparing the ensemble power integrated over the entire k∈[10,20] µm⁻¹ band (Fig. 3d) with the angle-integrated forward scattering cross-section Qscat of the isolated resonator (Fig. 3e). This metric is blind to whether the angular distribution within the designed band changes with photon energy or resonator geometry, so it cannot establish that the angular and spectral channels are independent. Please add an angle-resolved comparison, for example normalized scattering intensity versus k at several photon energies for each resonator shape, or a direct comparison of the FDTD far-field pattern with the product of the designed SDF and the single-resonator angular form factor.
[Secs. 2.1 and 3.3] The factorization of the far-field scattering into a lattice structure factor and a single-resonator form factor is introduced under the first Born approximation for low-index-contrast structures, yet the FDTD study uses n=3.5 resonators and the experiments use Au nanopillars on Si. The claim of independent control therefore requires a quantitative check of the factorization in this regime. The paper already notes "slight spectral differences are likely due to lattice interactions" (§3.3) and S.3 shows that the decoration unit modifies the SDF at high spatial frequencies; please quantify this cross-talk, e.g., by comparing FDTD angle- and wavelength-resolved scattering with the structure-factor × form-factor prediction, and by varying areal density or separation to estimate the strength of near-field and lattice couplings.
[Abstract and Conclusion] The abstract claims "individual and independent control over light scattering in angular and spectral terms," but the spectral control is demonstrated only in FDTD simulations of dielectric resonators; the fabricated Au nanopillar samples are characterized only at a single wavelength (640 nm) by Fourier microscopy. As written, the claim overstates the experimental support. Either add angle-resolved spectral measurements of at least one decorated sample or clearly restrict the independence claim to the simulation-level demonstration and describe the experimental validation as angular-only.
[Secs. 3.4 and 3.5] The superposition of patterns in real space assumes "linear, non-interacting scattering contributions," but the manuscript does not verify that the overlaid point patterns avoid overlapping or closely spaced decoration units. The S.3 discussion already notes that point density increases with target wavevector and limits the maximum decorator size; without a report of the minimum center-to-center spacing in the combined patterns (e.g., Fig. 5a), it remains possible that the two subpatterns interact near coincidence points. Please provide this statistical check or an analysis of its impact on the summed response.

minor comments (4)

[Fig. 5e caption] The red curve is described as the ring subpattern integrated over k∈[15,20] µm⁻¹, but the ring subpattern is designed for k∈[5,10] µm⁻¹; please correct the range or color assignment.
[Sec. 3.3] The text states "rinner = 75 nm, rinner = 125 nm" for the ring; the second quantity should be router. In addition, the ring color is called red in the Fig. 3 caption and orange in the text; please make the color naming consistent.
[Sec. 2.5] The phrase "spana 500 nm" should be "span 500 nm"; please proofread for similar grammatical typos throughout.
[Figs. 2e and 4j-l] The SDF comparisons are normalized and vertically shifted, so the figures support agreement in peak position and relative shape but not in absolute scattering intensity; please state this explicitly in the figure discussions, since the text uses phrases like "agree very well" without noting the normalization.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the angular and spectral claims are validated against independent SEM, Fourier-microscopy, and FDTD calculations rather than against fitted or definitionally equivalent inputs.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. The angular-scattering claim is tested by comparing the SDF extracted from SEM images and Fourier-microscopy reflectance with the input SDF. Although the point pattern is generated to reproduce the input SDF, the SEM and Fourier-microscopy data are independent measurements, so a mismatch would have been evidence against the method. The spectral claim is supported by full FDTD simulations whose far-field spectra are compared with, not fitted to, single-resonator forward-scattering cross-sections; this comparison is an interpretation made under the stated non-interacting-resonator assumption, not a construction of the prediction from the fitted quantity. The first-Born factorization in Sec. 2.1 is a stated approximation, not an imported uniqueness theorem, and the paper explicitly acknowledges deviations such as the ring form-factor effect in Fig. 3b and possible lattice interactions, showing that limits are admitted rather than defined away. Self-citations, such as Ref. 9 on hyperuniform textures, provide background and are not load-bearing for the central derivation. The supplementary note that the decoration unit modifies the SDF at high spatial frequencies is a recognized correction, not a hidden equivalence. The concern that angular and spectral control are not demonstrated to be fully independent is a correctness or assumption limitation, not a circularity, because no prediction reduces by construction to an input and no parameter is fitted to the data it is later said to predict.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The method introduces no new physical entities. It relies on standard Fourier optics and a set of hand-chosen image-processing parameters (blob threshold, sigma levels, amplitude noise, filling fraction, resonator radius). These are design knobs rather than fitted physical constants, and the paper includes sensitivity studies in S.3. The main load-bearing assumptions are the Born-approximation decoupling of structure factor and form factor, and the independent-resonator approximation for decorated patterns.

free parameters (6)

Amplitude noise range g = not fitted; arbitrary range
In S1 the Fourier amplitude for each k is sampled from |I(k) ± g*I(k)|; g is a hand-chosen random draw range that affects realized patterns but not the central trend.
Blob detection intensity threshold = 1% of maximum
In S1 the LoG detector suppresses blobs below this threshold; it is set by hand and not automatically optimized.
Number of sigma levels for Laplacian of Gaussians = 3 (default)
S3 uses three sigma levels by default and shows the SDF is insensitive to this choice, so it is a mild free parameter.
Filling fraction for pattern comparisons = ~16% (simulations), 50% (thresholded reference)
Chosen to isolate form-factor effects from coverage; not fitted to any target response.
Random phase seed for Fourier phases = not reported
In Sec. 2.2 phases are uniformly random in [-pi, pi) and no seed is given, so generated patterns are not bit-reproducible from the preprint alone.
Decoration unit radius = 50 nm default; 80, 113, 195, 260 nm in demonstrations
The designer-chosen resonator size is the spectral control knob; the paper does not fit it to data, but the central independence claim depends on choosing it without perturbing the point pattern's SDF.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption First Born approximation factorization of far-field scattering into structure factor times form factor
Sec. 2.1: 'In the first Born approximation... corresponds to evaluating the product...' Used to justify that angular scattering follows the SDF and spectral response follows the resonator.
domain assumption Isolated, non-interacting resonator behavior in decorated patterns
Sec. 3.3: 'we assume that each decorator acts as an individual resonator', and Sec. 3.4 assumes linear, non-interacting scattering contributions. The paper itself suspects lattice interactions.
domain assumption Spatial correlation of blob coordinates preserves the input SDF sufficiently
The method is justified by comparing SDFs of output and input; S2 admits thresholded patterns preserve the spatial information better, so the point readout is an approximation.
domain assumption Isotropic in-plane scattering and radial SDF representation
Sec. 2.1: 'We only consider in-plane isotropic diffraction; thus fSDF(k) can be reduced to a 1D scalar.' This restricts the design space to rotationally symmetric angular responses.
standard math Gaussian random field with random phases is a valid parent process
GRF modeling is inherited from refs [11,12] and is a standard Fourier-space construction; not introduced by this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Blob Detection for Photonic Metasurface Designing: Angular and Spectral Control of Scattered Light." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/P2IL62MI

@misc{pith2026250720857,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Blob Detection for Photonic Metasurface Designing: Angular and Spectral Control of Scattered Light},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/P2IL62MI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.20857}
}

read the original abstract

Metasurfaces with precise spectral and angular control of light scattering are of growing interest for photonic applications requiring advanced photon management. Correlated disorder emerged as a promising route for angular control of light scattering, but most design approaches are computationally expensive or do not allow spectral tunability. Here, we introduce a reverse-engineering design approach for correlated-disordered metasurfaces based on tailoring the Fourier space and blob detection to create point distributions that are later "decorated" with individually designed nano-resonators or meta-atoms to tune the optical response for the desired functionality. We validate the control of the angular scattering by fabricating ensembles of Au nanopillars following our design and characterizing their angular scattering with Fourier microscopy. Using finite-difference time-domain simulations, we demonstrate how the choice of decorative unit tunes the spectral response, showcasing individual and independent control over light scattering in angular and spectral terms. Lastly, we expand the limits of our versatile approach by combining multiple metasurfaces in one, effectively adding their individual scattering characteristics. As such, we can address spectral and angular ranges independently, yielding a high degree of control of the scattering response.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

[1]

Neder, Y

V. Neder, Y. Ra’di, A. Alù, et al. , ``Combined Metagratings for Efficient Broad - Angle Scattering Metasurface ,'' ACS Photonics 6 , 1010--1017 (2019)

work page 2019
[2]

Haghtalab, M

M. Haghtalab, M. Tamagnone, A. Y. Zhu, et al. , ``Ultrahigh Angular Selectivity of Disorder - Engineered Metasurfaces ,'' ACS Photonics 7 , 991--1000 (2020)

work page 2020
[3]

Koirala, S.-S

I. Koirala, S.-S. Lee, and D.-Y. Choi, ``Highly transmissive subtractive color filters based on an all-dielectric metasurface incorporating TiO _ 2 nanopillars,'' Optics Express 26 , 18320 (2018)

work page 2018
[4]

Yu and F

N. Yu and F. Capasso, ``Flat optics with designer metasurfaces,'' Nature Materials 13 , 139--150 (2014)

work page 2014
[5]

Balthasar Mueller, N

J. Balthasar Mueller, N. A. Rubin, R. C. Devlin, et al. , ``Metasurface Polarization Optics : Independent Phase Control of Arbitrary Orthogonal States of Polarization ,'' Physical Review Letters 118 , 113901 (2017)

work page 2017
[6]

Arbabi, Y

A. Arbabi, Y. Horie, M. Bagheri, et al. , ``Dielectric metasurfaces for complete control of phase and polarization with subwavelength spatial resolution and high transmission,'' Nature Nanotechnology 10 , 937--943 (2015)

work page 2015
[7]

E. B. Whiting, S. D. Campbell, L. Kang, et al. , ``Meta-atom library generation via an efficient multi-objective shape optimization method,'' Optics Express 28 , 24229 (2020)

work page 2020
[8]

T. Liu, R. Xu, P. Yu, et al. , ``Multipole and multimode engineering in Mie resonance-based metastructures,'' Nanophotonics 9 , 1115--1137 (2020)

work page 2020

Show all 44 references

[9]

Tavakoli, R

N. Tavakoli, R. Spalding, A. Lambertz, et al. , ``Over 65\
[10]

van Lare and A

M.-C. van Lare and A. Polman, ``Optimized Scattering Power Spectral Density of Photovoltaic Light - Trapping Patterns ,'' ACS Photonics 2 , 822--831 (2015)

2015
[11]

S. Yu, C. Wang, Y. Zhang, et al. , ``Design of Non - Deterministic Quasi -random Nanophotonic Structures Using Fourier Space Representations ,'' Scientific Reports 7 , 3752 (2017)

2017
[12]

W.-K. Lee, S. Yu, C. J. Engel, et al. , ``Concurrent design of quasi-random photonic nanostructures,'' Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114 , 8734--8739 (2017)

2017
[13]

Buencuerpo, J

J. Buencuerpo, J. M. Llorens, J. M. Ripalda, et al. , ``Engineering the reciprocal space for ultrathin GaAs solar cells,'' Optics & Laser Technology 142 , 107224 (2021)

2021
[14]

E. R. Martins, J. Li, Y. Liu, et al. , ``Deterministic quasi-random nanostructures for photon control,'' Nature Communications 4 , 2665 (2013)

2013
[15]

W. Ji, J. Chang, H.-X. Xu, et al. , ``Recent advances in metasurface design and quantum optics applications with machine learning, physics-informed neural networks, and topology optimization methods,'' Light: Science & Applications 12 (2023)

2023
[16]

Molesky, Z

S. Molesky, Z. Lin, A. Y. Piggott, et al. , ``Inverse design in nanophotonics,'' Nature Photonics 12 , 659--670 (2018)

2018
[17]

Chen and S

D. Chen and S. Torquato, ``Designing Disordered Hyperuniform Two - Phase Materials with Novel Physical Properties ,'' Acta Materialia 142 , 152--161 (2018)

2018
[18]

Buencuerpo, T

J. Buencuerpo, T. E. Saenz, M. Steger, et al. , ``Efficient light-trapping in ultrathin GaAs solar cells using quasi-random photonic crystals,'' Nano Energy 96 , 107080 (2022)

2022
[19]

Van De Groep and A

J. Van De Groep and A. Polman, ``Designing dielectric resonators on substrates: Combining magnetic and electric resonances,'' Optics Express 21 , 26285 (2013)

2013
[20]

N. A. Butakov and J. A. Schuller, ``Designing Multipolar Resonances in Dielectric Metamaterials ,'' Scientific Reports 6 , 38487 (2016)

2016
[21]

B. S. Luk’yanchuk, N. V. Voshchinnikov, R. Paniagua-Domínguez, et al. , ``Optimum Forward Light Scattering by Spherical and Spheroidal Dielectric Nanoparticles with High Refractive Index ,'' ACS Photonics 2 , 993--999 (2015)

2015
[22]

Rahimzadegan, T

A. Rahimzadegan, T. D. Karamanos, R. Alaee, et al. , ``A Comprehensive Multipolar Theory for Periodic Metasurfaces ,'' Advanced Optical Materials 10 , 2102059 (2022)

2022
[23]

Spinelli and A

P. Spinelli and A. Polman, ``Light Trapping in Thin Crystalline Si Solar Cells Using Surface Mie Scatterers ,'' IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics 4 , 554--559 (2014)

2014
[24]

N. Lee, M. Xue, J. Hong, et al. , ``Multi‐ Resonant Mie Resonator Arrays for Broadband Light Trapping in Ultrathin c‐ Si Solar Cells ,'' Advanced Materials 35 , 2210941 (2023)

2023
[25]

L. S. Froufe-Pérez, M. Engel, P. F. Damasceno, et al. , ``Role of Short - Range Order and Hyperuniformity in the Formation of Band Gaps in Disordered Photonic Materials ,'' Physical Review Letters 117 , 053902 (2016)

2016
[26]

S. Yu, Y. Zhang, C. Wang, et al. , ``Characterization and Design of Functional Quasi - Random Nanostructured Materials Using Spectral Density Function ,'' Journal of Mechanical Design 139 , 071401 (2017)

2017
[27]

A. Iyer, R. Dulal, Y. Zhang, et al. , ``Designing anisotropic microstructures with spectral density function,'' Computational Materials Science 179 , 109559 (2020)

2020
[28]

W. Shi, Y. Jiao, and S. Torquato, ``Three-dimensional construction of hyperuniform, nonhyperuniform, and antihyperuniform disordered heterogeneous materials and their transport properties via spectral density functions,'' Physical Review E 111 , 035310 (2025)

2025
[29]

Teubner, ``Level Surfaces of Gaussian Random Fields and Microemulsions ,'' Europhysics Letters (EPL) 14 , 403--408 (1991)

M. Teubner, ``Level Surfaces of Gaussian Random Fields and Microemulsions ,'' Europhysics Letters (EPL) 14 , 403--408 (1991)

1991
[30]

Ma and S

Z. Ma and S. Torquato, ``Random scalar fields and hyperuniformity,'' Journal of Applied Physics 121 , 244904 (2017)

2017
[31]

J. J. Koenderink, ``The structure of images,'' Biological Cybernetics 50 , 363--370 (1984)

1984
[32]

Lindeberg, Scale- Space Theory in Computer Vision , Springer US, Boston, MA (1994)

T. Lindeberg, Scale- Space Theory in Computer Vision , Springer US, Boston, MA (1994)

1994
[33]

Majanga and S

V. Majanga and S. Viriri, ``Automatic Blob Detection for Dental Caries ,'' Applied Sciences 11 , 9232 (2021)

2021
[34]

Di Ruberto, A

C. Di Ruberto, A. Loddo, and G. Puglisi, ``Blob Detection and Deep Learning for Leukemic Blood Image Analysis ,'' Applied Sciences 10 , 1176 (2020)

2020
[35]

Manzorro, Y

R. Manzorro, Y. Xu, J. L. Vincent, et al. , ``Exploring Blob Detection to Determine Atomic Column Positions and Intensities in Time - Resolved TEM Images with Ultra - Low Signal -to- Noise ,'' Microscopy and Microanalysis 28 , 1917--1930 (2022)

2022
[36]

Van Der Walt, J

S. Van Der Walt, J. L. Schönberger, J. Nunez-Iglesias, et al. , ``scikit-image: image processing in Python ,'' PeerJ 2 , e453 (2014)

2014
[37]

Cueff, L

S. Cueff, L. Berguiga, and H. S. Nguyen, ``Fourier imaging for nanophotonics,'' Nanophotonics 13 , 841--858 (2024)

2024
[38]

Sersic, C

I. Sersic, C. Tuambilangana, and A. Femius Koenderink, ``Fourier microscopy of single plasmonic scatterers,'' New Journal of Physics 13 , 083019 (2011)

2011
[39]

C. I. Osorio, A. Mohtashami, and A. F. Koenderink, ``K-space polarimetry of bullseye plasmon antennas,'' Scientific Reports 5 , 9966 (2015)

2015
[40]

Mohtashami, C

A. Mohtashami, C. I. Osorio, and A. F. Koenderink, ``Angle- Resolved Polarimetry of Antenna - Mediated Fluorescence ,'' Physical Review Applied 4 , 054014 (2015)

2015
[41]

, FDTD Solutions - 3D Electromagnetic Simulator

Lumerical Inc. , FDTD Solutions - 3D Electromagnetic Simulator
[42]

Vilayphone, M

K. Vilayphone, M. Amara, R. Orobtchouk, et al. , ``Design Rules for Structural Colors in All - Dielectric Metasurfaces : From Individual Resonators to Collective Resonances and Color Multiplexing ,'' ACS Photonics 11 , 470--483 (2024)

2024
[43]

V. E. Babicheva and A. B. Evlyukhin, ``Multipole lattice effects in high refractive index metasurfaces,'' Journal of Applied Physics 129 , 040902 (2021)

2021
[44]

V. I. Zakomirnyi, S. V. Karpov, H. Ågren, et al. , ``Collective lattice resonances in disordered and quasi-random all-dielectric metasurfaces,'' Journal of the Optical Society of America B 36 , E21 (2019)

2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Neder, Y

V. Neder, Y. Ra’di, A. Alù, et al. , ``Combined Metagratings for Efficient Broad - Angle Scattering Metasurface ,'' ACS Photonics 6 , 1010--1017 (2019)

work page 2019

[2] [2]

Haghtalab, M

M. Haghtalab, M. Tamagnone, A. Y. Zhu, et al. , ``Ultrahigh Angular Selectivity of Disorder - Engineered Metasurfaces ,'' ACS Photonics 7 , 991--1000 (2020)

work page 2020

[3] [3]

Koirala, S.-S

I. Koirala, S.-S. Lee, and D.-Y. Choi, ``Highly transmissive subtractive color filters based on an all-dielectric metasurface incorporating TiO _ 2 nanopillars,'' Optics Express 26 , 18320 (2018)

work page 2018

[4] [4]

Yu and F

N. Yu and F. Capasso, ``Flat optics with designer metasurfaces,'' Nature Materials 13 , 139--150 (2014)

work page 2014

[5] [5]

Balthasar Mueller, N

J. Balthasar Mueller, N. A. Rubin, R. C. Devlin, et al. , ``Metasurface Polarization Optics : Independent Phase Control of Arbitrary Orthogonal States of Polarization ,'' Physical Review Letters 118 , 113901 (2017)

work page 2017

[6] [6]

Arbabi, Y

A. Arbabi, Y. Horie, M. Bagheri, et al. , ``Dielectric metasurfaces for complete control of phase and polarization with subwavelength spatial resolution and high transmission,'' Nature Nanotechnology 10 , 937--943 (2015)

work page 2015

[7] [7]

E. B. Whiting, S. D. Campbell, L. Kang, et al. , ``Meta-atom library generation via an efficient multi-objective shape optimization method,'' Optics Express 28 , 24229 (2020)

work page 2020

[8] [8]

T. Liu, R. Xu, P. Yu, et al. , ``Multipole and multimode engineering in Mie resonance-based metastructures,'' Nanophotonics 9 , 1115--1137 (2020)

work page 2020