pith. sign in

arxiv: 2507.20937 · v3 · pith:VITZAVMFnew · submitted 2025-07-28 · 🧮 math.CO · cs.CG· cs.DM

General Strong Bound on the Uncrossed Number via a Tight Bound for the Maximum Uncrossed Subgraph Number

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 02:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.CO cs.CGcs.DM
keywords uncrossed numbergraph drawingthicknessplanar subgraphsdense graphslower boundscrossing number
0
0 comments X

The pith

A graph's uncrossed number is at least the number of edges divided by a denominator that subtracts square-root correction terms from the usual planar-graph limit.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper strengthens the lower bound on the uncrossed number unc(G), the smallest number of drawings of G such that every edge remains uncrossed in at least one drawing. It does so by first proving a tighter upper bound on the largest number of edges that can stay uncrossed inside any single drawing of G, then converting that bound into the improved denominator 3|V| - 6 - sqrt(2|E|) + sqrt(6(|V|-2)). A reader cares because the new expression gives a strictly stronger guarantee than the classical thickness bound and the recent non-trivial bound, and the authors supply a matching construction showing the bound is asymptotically tight for every positive edge density.

Core claim

The uncrossed number satisfies ⌈|E(G)| / (3|V(G)| - 6 - √(2|E(G)|) + √(6(|V(G)| - 2)))⌉ ≤ unc(G). This follows directly from an upper bound on the maximum uncrossed subgraph number in any drawing. For dense graphs with |E| = ε|V|² the bound simplifies to a multiplicative constant 3 - √(2 - ε) that is asymptotically tight for every ε > 0, as certified by an explicit construction on the maximum uncrossed subgraph.

What carries the argument

The upper bound on the size of a maximum uncrossed subgraph in an arbitrary drawing of G, which is then inverted to produce the improved lower bound on unc(G).

If this is right

  • The classical thickness lower bound is strictly improved for every graph.
  • In the dense regime the constant in the denominator rises from roughly 2.82 to 3 - sqrt(2 - ε).
  • The new expression is tight up to lower-order terms for complete graphs near edge density 1/2.
  • A construction shows the underlying subgraph-size bound is asymptotically optimal for all positive densities.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The square-root corrections may be useful for refining other drawing parameters that mix planar and crossing constraints.
  • The same subgraph bound could be tested on geometric or straight-line drawings to see whether the improvement survives geometric restrictions.

Load-bearing premise

The specific upper bound placed on the number of uncrossed edges possible inside any single drawing must hold for every drawing and every graph.

What would settle it

A drawing of some graph in which the number of uncrossed edges exceeds the claimed upper bound on the maximum uncrossed subgraph, or a small dense graph whose uncrossed number lies strictly below the new lower-bound expression.

read the original abstract

We investigate a very recent concept for visualizing various aspects of a graph in the plane using a collection of drawings introduced by Hlin\v{e}n\'y and Masa\v{r}\'ik [GD 2023]. Formally, given a graph $G$, we aim to find an uncrossed collection containing drawings of $G$ in the plane such that each edge of $G$ is not crossed in at least one drawing in the collection. The uncrossed number of $G$ ($unc(G)$) is the smallest integer $k$ such that an uncrossed collection for $G$ of size $k$ exists. The uncrossed number is lower-bounded by the well-known thickness, which is an edge-decomposition of $G$ into planar graphs. This connection gives a trivial lower-bound $\lceil\frac{|E(G)|}{3|V(G)|-6}\rceil \le unc(G)$. In a recent paper, Balko, Hlin\v{e}n\'y, Masa\v{r}\'ik, Orthaber, Vogtenhuber, and Wagner [GD 2024] presented the first non-trivial and general lower-bound on the uncrossed number. We summarize it in terms of dense graphs (where $|E(G)|=\epsilon(|V(G)|)^2$ for some $\epsilon>0$): $\lceil\frac{|E(G)|}{c_\epsilon|V(G)|}\rceil \le unc(G)$, where $c_\epsilon\ge 2.82$ is a constant depending on $\epsilon$. We improve the lower-bound to state that $\lceil\frac{|E(G)|}{3|V(G)|-6-\sqrt{2|E(G)|}+\sqrt{6(|V(G)|-2)}}\rceil \le unc(G)$. Translated to dense graphs regime, the bound yields a multiplicative constant $c'_\epsilon=3-\sqrt{(2-\epsilon)}$ in the expression $\lceil\frac{|E(G)|}{c'_\epsilon|V(G)|+o(|V(G)|)}\rceil \le unc(G)$. Hence, it is tight (up to low-order terms) for $\epsilon \approx \frac{1}{2}$ as warranted by complete graphs. In fact, we formulate our result in the language of the maximum uncrossed subgraph number, that is, the maximum number of edges of $G$ that are not crossed in a drawing of $G$ in the plane. In that case, we also provide a construction certifying that our bound is asymptotically tight (up to lower-order terms) on dense graphs for all $\epsilon>0$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims an improved general lower bound on the uncrossed number unc(G) derived from a tight upper bound on the maximum uncrossed subgraph size in any drawing: ⌈|E(G)| / (3|V(G)| - 6 - √(2|E(G)|) + √(6(|V(G)| - 2)))⌉ ≤ unc(G). For dense graphs with |E(G)| = ε |V(G)|² the bound is asserted to yield the multiplicative constant c'_ε = 3 - √(2 - ε) in ⌈|E(G)| / (c'_ε |V(G)| + o(|V(G)|))⌉ ≤ unc(G). The authors also supply a construction establishing asymptotic tightness (up to lower-order terms) for all ε > 0.

Significance. If the algebraic inconsistency in the dense-regime constant is corrected, the result would constitute a clear strengthening of the thickness bound and the earlier non-trivial bound of Balko et al. (GD 2024). The intermediate bound on the maximum uncrossed subgraph is cleanly derived and parameter-free; the accompanying construction for tightness is a substantive contribution that shows the new denominator is asymptotically sharp on dense graphs.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the stated dense-graph constant c'_ε = 3 - √(2 - ε) is algebraically inconsistent with the given denominator. Substituting |E(G)| = ε |V(G)|² produces the leading term n(3 - √(2ε)) + o(n), so the correct constant is 3 - √(2ε). For ε = 1/2 the expansion yields 2 while the manuscript states ≈1.776; this error directly affects the tightness claim for complete graphs and the asserted value of c'_ε for all ε > 0.
minor comments (1)
  1. Ensure the asymptotic notation in the dense-regime statement is stated with the same precision used in the general bound (explicitly tracking the √(6(n-2)) term).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and for identifying the algebraic inconsistency in the stated dense-graph constant. We agree that a correction is needed and will revise the manuscript accordingly. The main theorem and the tightness construction remain valid with the corrected expression.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the stated dense-graph constant c'_ε = 3 - √(2 - ε) is algebraically inconsistent with the given denominator. Substituting |E(G)| = ε |V(G)|² produces the leading term n(3 - √(2ε)) + o(n), so the correct constant is 3 - √(2ε). For ε = 1/2 the expansion yields 2 while the manuscript states ≈1.776; this error directly affects the tightness claim for complete graphs and the asserted value of c'_ε for all ε > 0.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The error is a typographical mistake in the abstract: the correct leading coefficient is indeed 3 - √(2ε), obtained by substituting |E| = ε n² into the denominator 3n - √(2|E|) + √(6(n-2)) and extracting the linear term in n. We will replace the stated c'_ε = 3 - √(2 - ε) with c'_ε = 3 - √(2ε) throughout the abstract and any related discussion. The construction establishing asymptotic tightness (up to lower-order terms) for all ε > 0 applies directly to the corrected denominator; for ε = 1/2 the constant becomes 2, which is consistent with the behavior for complete graphs. This isolated correction does not affect the validity of the general lower bound or the maximum-uncrossed-subgraph result. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained

full rationale

The paper establishes a new upper bound on the maximum uncrossed subgraph size in any drawing via the inequalities δ ≥ √(2(m - p)) and √(2(m - p)) ≥ √(2m) - √(2p) with p = 3n - 6, yielding the explicit denominator 3|V(G)| - 6 - √(2|E(G)|) + √(6(|V(G)| - 2)) and the resulting lower bound on unc(G). This step is derived from first principles and planar graph edge bounds rather than by redefining the target quantity or fitting parameters to the output. The asymptotic tightness claim for dense graphs rests on a construction presented within the current manuscript. Prior self-citations (to Hliněný-Masařík 2023 and Balko et al. 2024) supply only background definitions and the previous weaker bound; they are not load-bearing for the new denominator or the tightness argument. The noted algebraic slip in the dense-regime constant (3 - √(2 - ε) instead of the correct 3 - √(2ε)) is a calculation error, not a circular reduction. The overall chain remains independent of its own outputs and externally verifiable via the stated inequalities and construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard planar-graph edge bounds (3|V|-6) plus a new upper bound on the maximum uncrossed subgraph; no free parameters are fitted to data and no new entities are postulated.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Any planar graph on v vertices has at most 3v-6 edges (for v≥3).
    Invoked implicitly when relating uncrossed collections to thickness and planar subgraphs.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 6057 in / 1331 out tokens · 31223 ms · 2026-05-19T02:23:48.674782+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.